This legal notice asserts that Charles Jefferson Barnett failed to respond to a previous notice and provide proofs to counter claims made by Shannon Chalker. The notice gives Barnett 10 more days to contest the claims by supplying line-by-line evidence, otherwise a notice of default will be sent as proof of agreement to the established facts of the case. It concerns monetary sums of $8,100 that Chalker asserts were not owed based on a lack of evidence from Barnett regarding contractual obligations and allegations of theft or fraud.
Original Description:
This is step one to forming a tacit agreement, or gaining agreement by silence.
This legal notice asserts that Charles Jefferson Barnett failed to respond to a previous notice and provide proofs to counter claims made by Shannon Chalker. The notice gives Barnett 10 more days to contest the claims by supplying line-by-line evidence, otherwise a notice of default will be sent as proof of agreement to the established facts of the case. It concerns monetary sums of $8,100 that Chalker asserts were not owed based on a lack of evidence from Barnett regarding contractual obligations and allegations of theft or fraud.
This legal notice asserts that Charles Jefferson Barnett failed to respond to a previous notice and provide proofs to counter claims made by Shannon Chalker. The notice gives Barnett 10 more days to contest the claims by supplying line-by-line evidence, otherwise a notice of default will be sent as proof of agreement to the established facts of the case. It concerns monetary sums of $8,100 that Chalker asserts were not owed based on a lack of evidence from Barnett regarding contractual obligations and allegations of theft or fraud.
On February 19th I caused to be sent to Respondent a NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE CODITIONS PRECEDENT
AND OPPORTUNITY TO CONTEST ACCEPTANCE of my counter claim/offer in response to numerous threatening and vulgar voicemails wherein I accepted respondents offer to return sum $8100.00 and admit that the monies were not owe IF Respondent could provide the requested and necessary proofs of claim that you were not contractually obligated to pay Shannon Chalker, later assuming the name STRYKER ROOFING OF TEXAS. And that no so-called theft and/or insurance fraud ever occurred at any point in time, and that the contracting, collecting deductibles, filing insurance claims, and sending final invoices, was not only known and accepted, but was required in the normal course of business. And that at no point did SC or SRT collect, take, steal, defraud anyone at any point in time. Respondent failed to provide the required proofs of claim in is in full agreement with the counter offer/claim by choosing to remain silent. Respondent has 10 more days to contest SCs presentment by supplying the proofs pf claim, line by line point by point. After 10 days if you have not responded I will cause to be sent to you a NOTICE OF EFAULT AND AQUIESENCE, AFFIDAVIT OF NEGATIVE AVERMENT, CERTIFICATE OF NON- RESPONSE as proof of our agreement and established facts.