November 17, 2017 Name: A.-clle Downs ENGW3307 Project 2 Reflection Semester after semester, students email, visit, and even snail-mail thank yous for the work done in ENGW3307; many after graduating. Nearly every one mentions the literature review. My question for you: Why? What tasks do you see in this assignment that make it a memorable and (according to your peers) valuable learning experience? What skills did you exercise that you think may be transferable to other situations? For example, why do CEOs and hiring managers say they want people who can read *across* a set of reports/studies/papers and detect patterns? ln. a well-organized reflection; explore why you think so-many consider this assignment an asset, even if they don’t stay in academia. What do you see in this assignment, in the process of writing it, not just the final product? You have a lot of evidence to consider: your experience, your process and work, your classmates’ work, myths about AWD, or other writing in your field . . . ‘You might also think about this assignment worked with your writing process. How-did (or could) your writing process change to-better fit this assignment? How has your research process y! ? ¥ P ¥ changed? Looking forward, what would you do differently the next time you write this type of document? (Note: not this exact document, but a similar review of material.) Given-time, ‘resources, and-sleep, what would you chanige about your current literature review? ‘As always, please be very specific — mention particular paragraphs or passages in your paper, searches that you did, prewriting pieces, peer reviews, or any other pertinent material Fae aogrgminent 3 An anset because ib Canes? favs abit, to understand — and iviterpret largler level Iderabure. Por manu, students feotcnn, to guove gynduabe fun edvendcon, thee aspignment Welee ertee she FC there hes Te alse reveals whuuk me maerney mm ygaur eth; a gee Hed a etrdent wavy be alle 4 ft at wt im thet Ife. Sows for we, teed bo paprel dam asergmment Ab Someta, Hore could 90 toward —invy Medical Selwot agptreatren . Therefore, TL ded my peor to up He caliber 7 thro phresel % Hanne, For exawple TL ded She reavonnsy beled Heese elatrstres dre gurls, sgeertate wile (ete empimal evedeven te baat then of . vhs Ta another anriggement, “Egmont, would lave grad, “hee wre ne Inte suygirk of 4hose claws, The te hore Rie ma, aS emenne ent Ny ube trite to Le as Sucemt 0b gertriele- . BP Gren ture raovrees, on steee, Td add wore +2 wiry ape vel income geckos. Thee wee the bardlest to fra meant artretes on, however Le cath ave done yore loctemey After tht teat drab, Re He sek got, T combined fo lyon my oragpna eure anc wg Insternn, bce on tt, T de Venn, tha Uronderech mes L alse worth te add qnsre ywnlo; but Mur Lutes, Henne ee Soumes , must orl Yad grapte 60 T tral fo Slag wr Ime with Het.PART 2: List your reviewers’ (peers, whole class, instructor) two or three most useful or most meaningful stiggestions for Project 2. For each suggestion, quickly but specifically (10 or fewer words) write what you did in response. For example, if you ignored a suggestion, you could write, “Too much work: ignored” or "Puzzling; ignored” or if you followed a suggestion, you could write, “Tried to follow, moved 3 paragraphs, added sentence to intro.” As usual, be specific and be candid — it will help you (itis a reflection, after all), me, and future students. Suggestion: My action rae bile vere ef{Cehe done = odd So nrore Sehralortes, peer ree tewed fone, uted to develog 2ectovs tha were Sources aclernsy- cd ec etrace o¢etlinds avd grominar. lried +o foltow. revamped intro and conelusron gptcrtrentlay