1.

I think you are writing to an audience that agrees with the food crisis happening in the US by
stating facts in the writing of the amount of people that are living in food insecure households.
Evidence of this would be the numbers presented in the introduction, but they are not cited so
you should do that soon. Also, it is a bit unclear as to who you are talking to or arguing against,
so you should make that a bit clear.
2. The writer has chosen to address food crisis in the US, but I think it is mainly focused on Los
Angeles. I believe the issue affects him directly because he is raised in the LA community, and is
affecting other people that live in the same area as him. He clearly showed the audience the
issue and his focus on it, but he did not connect the issue between the food crisis and himself.
3. I believe he is writing to make the audience become aware of the food crisis happening in the
US, and what they could do to help feed those that lack food.
4. He uses charts and percentages to support his reasoning, but the writing does not seem to use
other articles to support his work. I do see evidence, but I cant really trust it because it is not
cited just yet.
5. He does not address alternative views and perspectives on the issue

1. I think you have chosen to write an argument for an audience that agrees with them by stating a
lot of data showed that how serious of food crisis. You showed most of the data on the
introduction.
2. The writer has chosen to address food crisis. However, the writer should have a bigger data
bases which may include the whole America instead. I did not see any information that related
to him.
3. I think he hope to use audiences power to be aware of food crisis and decrease it. People
should know that the speed that people who consume food is faster than the globe can produce
food.
4. He uses a of numerical data to support his statement.
5. not yet alternative views.