I am quitting Ethereum Classic.

My name is david. I have also sometimes gone by the handle keepdoing. I own
the social media presence ETCisComing. This includes the website, twitter,
facebook, slack and reddit presences. As a person who has been heavily involved
in Ethereum Classic since day one of its existence, I have finally come to the
conclusion that Ethereum Classic has no future, nor should it. Therefore I am
shutting down the EtcIsComing Twitter and website, and have already at the time
of writing liquidated most of my holdings into other, more sensible projects.

Nevertheless I feel that I owe it to the community to write this page, not only as a
rationale for my actions, but as a warning to anyone invested in Ethereum-based
assets.

I will start by saying that Ethereum Classic has not delivered on its (already
questionable) value proposition. From the moment ETC was created, the
community has tried to brand it as a more responsible and decentralized version of
Ethereum. A lot of people had ideological issues with the way the DAO
incident was handled, but more generally the community was concerned with the
reckless and irresponsible actions of the Ethereum developers. This was a
legitimate and noble purpose, as poor coding and negligence with regards to
security by Ethereum developers has already resulted
in millions and millions and millions worth of damage for individuals and business
es. Ethereum Classic's value proposition was that it was Ethereum, but (a) truly
decentralized not controlled by the Ethereum Foundation, and (b) minus the
move fast and break things modus operandi.

The problem is that it has become apparent to me that Ethereum Classic is not, in
fact, a responsible, long-term-oriented Ethereum it is a crippled, sad wannabe
Ethereum. It's a sour grapes version of Ethereum and all the ideology is mainly
just a show.

Let's talk about development, shall we? Ethereum Classic supposedly has three
development teams. But who are these people?

1. The Ethereum Commonwealth. Ooh, sounds impressive, who are these

guys? "They" are actually just one guy Dexaran an anonymous guy from the
Internet. Occasionally he's gotten some people (volunteers? Paid contract
workers?) to help him, but mainly it's just him running the whole show. And this is
something a lot of people kind of know but will not admit there is a high
probability that Dexaran is the one who hacked the DAO in the first place.
Evidence:

A He is probably one of a handful of highly competent Ethereum

developers and security experts who could have pulled off the DAO incident
at the time. He's also posted publicly on the record that he is very sympathetic
to the DAO Attacker. Nobody has any clue who he is either.

B This post where he explains that his reason for developing on ETC is
because he is concerned the chain will fade into obsolescence. If you're such a
skilled Ethereum developer, why care? Why not just develop on Ethereum
and leave ETC alone then? That is, unless you have a lot of money tied up on
ETC.

Point is, if Dexaran is actually the DAO attacker (quite likely) then he has no
incentive to support ETC long-term. If his plan is to develop a decentralized
exchange, and also anonymity protocols on ETC perfect for being able to
liquidate the currently tainted ETC in the DAO attacker's address, perhaps?
If that is the case then the so-called Ethereum Commonwealth is only here
until the coins can be dumped on the market.

2. IOHK. The only real, professional company working on ETC development. But
let's face it IOHK's main project is not ETC, it's Cardano a newer blockchain
system also aiming to lead in the smart contract space. For every one
developerIOHK has assigned to ETC, they have five working on Cardano which
is set to become a major competitor to ETC and Ethereum. What can ETC be but a
testnet / playground for their main project? Charles Hoskinson (head of IOHK) is
one of the most respected members of the ETC community and clearly one of the
most competent developers alongside Dexaran. But although he will obviously
never admit it to the public, he is already one foot out the door with Cardano,
whose success is already becoming apparent.

3. ETCDEV. Considered the main development team for ETC. But they barely
DO ANYTHING. It has taken them over a whole year to deliver on a simple
monetary policy change (reducing the block reward and establishing a supply cap
of ~210 M coins). This should be simple, but has taken from last October until now
(the next December). Meanwhile their developers, mainly Splix, would continually
stir up division and conflict within the community and alienate the other two dev
teams. They have shot down very good proposals from IOHK on grounds of
decentralization and need for consensus while in reality they do whatever they
want without any regard for the community. Let us not forget that they
are privately funded by an anonymous third party, despite the fact that they have
called themselves volunteers and have asked for donations from the community.

So the state of ETC development is that there are three teams - (1) one
anonymous guy who is possibly the DAO attacker, (2) a company mainly working
on a directly competing product, and (3) a group that barely accomplishes anything
while causing division and being totally untransparent and misleading. This
criticism isn't new and was being commented on months ago.

And all of it shows. In the past year every other blockchain project has moved
forwards by leaps and bounds. But what has ETC done? Last fall the hype was talk
about monetary policy. In spring the hype was agreement about monetary policy.
In summer the hype was that the code for the monetary policy had finally been
written. Now it's December and the hype is that monetary policy is about to
actually be implemented. Also a couple of wallets came out in the meantime (not
that we didn't already have wallets, courtesy of Ethereum). Is this accomplishment?
Is this a revolutionary disruptor of a technology? Hell, is this even anything
remotely useful? I think not.

But what about the price? The price has gone up, hasn't it? Yes, it has. And this
is the problem the price has gone up based on what? Not because of any increase
in the inherent value of the chain. It's gone up because we have one big-shot
investor, Barry Silbert, who's gone to Wall Street and sold some people on it. It's
gone up because of hype it's been pumped. Any time anything at all happens
everyone rushes to stir up enthusiasm as if it's a big deal a major red flag that
nothing is really moving forward. The biggest excitement for the past year has
been the monetary policy which is just an artificial restriction of the supply in
order to make the price go up. But what is the utility of a higher price if the chain
itself is no more functional, has no more use cases being developed, than a year
ago? The only utility of a higher price in such a situation is the ability to sell for
more profit to dump.

The point I'm making is that the value proposition of Ethereum Classic is a sham.
Everyone claims it's decentralized, but a handful of people control the development
and the narrative. Everyone claims that ETC is more responsible than Ethereum
we would never spawn an ICO boom of questionable get-rich-quick-promising
crowdfunded projects with no working products. But in reality the ETCDEV team
is now closely associated with an ICO (with no working product) Fractalide, and
are trying to create a platform for launching ICOs (TokenMint). The whole ETC
community acts like it has some sort of ethical superiority over Ethereum, but in
practice they are trying to do the exact same thing they're just doing a pathetic
job of it so far with less resources. The big money in ETC is just pumping and
dumping, while the ordinary people are left in a state of denial, deluding
themselves into thinking that they're blazing some revolutionary path while they're
really just following Ethereum's footsteps, but at a snail's pace.

All the above points are the reasons I have decided to sell all of my ETC. But there
is also a much bigger reason why I am writing this, and why I have taken down my
website and twitter account. The bigger reason is that Ethereum (including ETC) is
a danger to the entire cryptocurrency space. Many (most?) of us in the space
believe that blockchain technology has the potential to revolutionize the world's
economic system and to facilitate a massive transfer of power from the banks and
corporations into the hands of ordinary people. But, there has been great resistance
from the existing system, which has tried to characterize cryptocurrencies as
nothing but unsafe, shady, and risky speculative assets (for example: Jamie Dimon
calling Bitcoin a fraud). And this system still has one largely untapped weapon up
its sleeve regulation.

The recklessness that has been happening and continues to happen in the Ethereum
ecosystem including the multitudes of unambiguously illegal (and often shady)
ICOs, and the long trail of damage left behind due to security errors prevalent in
the system strongly confirms the narrative that the establishment is spinning
about cryptocurrency in general. Furthermore, this will be the doorway to a
massive regulatory crackdown on all of cryptocurrency, the likes of which very
few people will anticipate. Cryptocurrency is currently very under-regulated, and
of course regulation is inevitable and healthy for its global adoption, but if the
banks, corporations, and governments need any excuse to wage open war on the
entire free cryptocurrency space, this is it.

Conclusion: I really am sad to say this, but I no longer believe in Ethereum, least
of all Ethereum Classic, as either a viable investment or as a source of positive
change. They have simply screwed things up too badly, past the point of no return.
Fortunately, Ethereum is no longer the only major smart contract platform in
existence several other good and viable projects now exist Cardano, as well as
NEO, and EOS (although I am not so familiar with these two), and also IOTA has
smart contract plans in 2018. And let us not forget about the Rootstock platform,
which is very close to bringing smart contract capability directly to the Bitcoin
network.

It took me 3 months of stepping back and stripping my emotional attachments

away in order to see things clearly. This wasn't a decision taken lightly, nor a post
written without trepidation. But these things needed saying. Please just strip
yourself of emotional attachment and consider honestly these things written. Best
wishes to the individuals whom I have met while involved in this project,
especially Classic_Kevin who has administered the day to day of ETCisComing
recently (and who was not made aware of my decision until moments before, and
who is a brilliant young man with a promising future. Kevin, I am sorry that this
will probably hurt you, but in this case the needs of the many outweighed the needs
of the one). Goodbye.