Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Annotated Bibliography - p4
Annotated Bibliography - p4
Mann
17 October 2017
Annotated Bibliography
Backe, Hans-Joachim. The Literary Canon in the Age of New Media. Poetics Today,
This piece is a scholarly journal article penned by a European-American professor with a noted
history in literature and philosophy in multiple languages. The article examines and discusses the
features of the American Literary canon as well as the changes being made to it and the
influences of political and social events to its structure. Backe carefully breaks the different
canons down to their fundamental parts and supports them with strong evidence from previous
scholars in the field. It offers insight into what makes a piece of literature worthy of merit, and
how such standards have been changed over time. This information will be helpful in my
argument, as it will provide foundation to my claims as to why The Handmaids Tale is indeed a
classic, as well as provide ideas to draw on as evidence for why it deserves merit.
Dockterman, Eliana. On the Urgency of the Handmaids Tale. Time Magazine, 7 Sept.
2017, http://time.com/collection-post/4925657/margaret-atwood-and-elisabeth-moss/.
A direct interview with Atwood from a renowned magazine, this piece is beyond credible.
However, it also includes Elisabeth Moss, the actress of Offred in the Hulu adaptation of the
novel. This combination offers a fresher perspective on the material and the societal context and
interpretation. Coming from two different generations, Moss and Atwood discuss not only the
issues addressed by The Handmaids Tale, but how it is perceived by different eras. This will
give strength to my argument about the classical nature of the novel by exemplifying the
timelessness and unceasing relevance of the work. It will also supplement my analysis of
Atwood and her intentions writing the story by explaining her thought processes behind the book
http://stage.centerforthehumanities.org/sites/default/files/media/Ketterer_Contextual%20
This scholarly journal, written by a well-versed literature professor, acts as an in-depth analysis
of what The Handmaids Tales underlying messages and warning could consist of, and what
they might mean. All logic and reasoning is very thorough and sensible, and assists the reader in
picking out the important bits of the novel while also acting to summarize it as a whole. His
thesis that Atwood focused on mutual survival of the sexes carries throughout his analyses,
creating a tone of possibility for every facet of the novel as a medium for this. Acting as a skilled
summation of key parts of the book and their importance, it makes a prime example to be able to
develop my own ideas and compare them to his interpretations of the work.
Neuman, Shirley. 'Just a Backlash': Margaret Atwood, Feminism, and The Handmaid's Tale."
University of Toronto Quarterly, vol. 246, no. 75.3, 2006, pp. 857-868,
Neuman is a Dean of Literature at a university, and her years of experience show well in the
research and analysis presented in this scholarly article. She has taken into account the history of
the books production and discussed its role in length. Acutely specific pieces of Atwoods time
during her writing, combined with speculative reasoning based on Margarets literary history and
personal beliefs, all written together as a confluence of factors in The Handmaids Tales
creation. All sources cited check out and are accompanied (in text) with interesting and useful
analysis. Ultimately, this will be one of the most helpful sources in my essay as it contains
gargantuan amounts of data and ideas to draw on in my argument. The article asserts things
about the novel that directly connect to my claims about the nature of a classic, making for easy
support in my claims.
Tale. Studies in Contemporary Literature, vol. 45, no. 1, 2003, pp. 83-96,
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jennifer_Wagner-
Lawlor/publication/240538490_From_Irony_to_Affiliation_in_Margaret_Atwood's_The
A professor in both English and Womens Studies, this author has penned a compelling piece
regarding the nature and context revolving around The Handmaids Tale. She takes her analysis
of the novel a new direction, challenging or qualifying the ideas of her fellow scholars. This
unique perspective provides a new take on the meaning and significance of the story, specifically
the protagonist, drawing new points from her dialogues to apply to the major themes. She goes
on to discuss her own interpretations, regarding identity and a more developed view of the
female role beyond simple feminism and survival in a nightmare world. This is a strong
source for a writer to draw from, since it contains such powerful interpretations and fresher looks
at the previously obvious parts of the novel. Its application to politics and society, as well, are
useful in the sense that they can be used as evidence when discussing politics and society in
Schwartz, Alexandra. Yes, The Handmaids Tale is Feminist. The New Yorker, 27 Apr. 2017,
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/yes-the-handmaids-tale-is-
Non-scholarly, this article still serves as to address the many concerns about the nature of The
Handmaids Tale as well as rebuttals to said logic. The article includes direct quotes from
actresses playing characters in the Hulu adaptation, as well as claims from Atwood herself to
illustrate the concerns about the primary message of the book. The author also adds her own
input about the subject, to explain to the audience the true purpose of the story, TV and novel
alike. For discussion about popular interpretation and cultural impact, the article is well suited to
serve as evidence. To argue that Tale is a classic, one will have to address the opinions of the
people and pit them against the logic drawn from the story, and this article assists this well.
A brief podcast about the personal impact of reading The Handmaids Tale and a further
discussion about the meaning, relevance, and importance of the story to modern society. Carried
out by three women of different ages, and thus, eras, its a well blended perspective on the
different takes of the story by different women at different times. Fundamentally, they indirectly
conclude, it remains powerful throughout all conditions, which provides support in a pro-classic
claim. Because it has and does maintain notability to wide audiences beyond the passage of time,
and is written in such a way that it can inspire strong emotional responses from them, it furthers
the argument that Tale is a classic because of its effect on people and its seeming immortality in
its themes.