Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V3i3 Ijertv3is030286 PDF
V3i3 Ijertv3is030286 PDF
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 3 Issue 3, March - 2014
Dr. D. K. Choudhury
Dean & Professor
Gitarattan International Business School, Delhi
(Affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi, India)
Abstract
second purpose of this study was to empirically assess the quality of the PMIS used by NTPC
in the light of the evaluation parameters suggested by researchers and mentioned in this
IJE
research paper.
Dave Cleland and Lew Ireland(2004) [5] Meredith and Mantel(2006)[10] found that
describes a project as a combination of utilising information technology (IT) has
organisational resources pulled together to major impact in solving all difficulties,
create something that did not previously which may appear during project life cycle
RT
exist and that will provide a performance phases, by presenting a crucial computer
capability in the design and execution of application, project management software
organisational strategies. such as, which may help in decreasing the
IJE
NTPC; the data were collected based on tool for taking decision on analysing the
informations furnished to the project
different criteria laid down by researchers
management manager. A good PMIS
with respect to quality of PMIS and its needs to contain the following
impact on project success. The data were characteristics:
analysed mathematically to draw the
conclusion. a. The PMIS should incorporate both
quantitative and qualitative data and
SECTION - B feedback from the project management
team through every phase of the project.
4. Characteristics of project b. For project monitoring, the PMIS must
management information system provide with the necessary information
A system is an assembly of procedures, and feedback so that potential problems
processes, methods and techniques are identified and solutions are
united by some form of regulated implemented before the problems become
interaction to form an organisational constraints. The system is to be developed
whole. But often, the term information in such a way which is capable of
system gets mixed up with concepts of generating enough information to initiate a
information technology, and is understood corrective action.
to refer to a computer system. Computers 5. Information system architecture
certainly have a role in most project A conceptual information system
information systems, but they are merely architecture was developed by
one component of the system, a tool for
Top Management
Portfolios
Strategy Definition
Portfolio Portfolio
Planning Controlling
Project
Office, Idea Project Project External
RT
Committees: Evaluation Preparation Controlling Project
Projects, Termination
Programs
IJE
Project
Manager : Idea Detailed Project Internal
Projects Generation Planning Execution Project
Termination
Processes
Data Structure
Decisions
Project
RT
Environmental/ Top-management/
Organisational data customer information
Project Management Information
System
The PMIS functions may be divided into based on the perceived contribution of the
five categories : PMIS with regard to three performance
criteria: respecting deadlines, respecting
The planning function tools aim at budgets, and respecting quality
preparing the overall project plan; they specifications.
include work breakdown structure,
resource estimation, overall schedule,
Gantt, PERT, and CPM. SECTION C
specification
4. Prepare bid
documents and RFP
5. Establish pre-
qualification
evaluation criteria
Bidding and contracting 1. Conduct pre- Contract committee
qualification exercise comprising :
2. Shortlist pre-qualified (a) Project development
contractors for tender committee
3. Contractors submit (b) Legal and other
bids and proposals advisors
4. Evaluate bids
5. Negotiate contracts
6. Appoint contractors
Project implementation 1. Administer contract Project Management Team
2. Contractors develop comprising of :
detailed design (a) Clients Project
3. Review design and Group
give approvals (b) Project Manager
4. Approve sub-vendors
and sub-contractors
5. Contractors proceed
RT
with construction and
commissioning
6. Control quality on
IJE
site
7. Commissioning
8. Training operators
Client
Management
Project Manager
Sub-Consultant
(Technical support)
RT
IJE
Sub-vendors
Similar for other
contractors
Sub-
contractors
(ii) Project planning and to achieve the end target. However, lot of
implementation conflicting activities were observed when
Once a project is approved after all the it was considered in isolation. Thus the
statutory, financial and other integrated project management and control
appraisals, it enters the realm of system has been developed for project
detailed planning where the work planning, scheduling, monitoring and
breakdown structure is developed, control using PERT/CPM network as the
responsibilities for different tasks are basic management tool.
decided upon, a timetable for doing
various jobs is prepared, the resource
requirements of men, machines, The system evolved keep in view all the
materials, and money are determined requirements of effective working, flow of
and suitable provisioning for the key information, feedback communication, and
resources is done so that organisation structure. It enables the
implementation could be carried out. involvement of all concerned in the
Project planning is the active phase of development of an agreed project
project management in which the programme, while at the same time
project manager and his team have an allowing total independence to each
opportunity to contribute their functional centre to schedule and control
experience and learning in the its own activities in greater details within
development of a realistic project plan. the overall plan called the Master Network
RT
analytical models can provide very identifies the milestone dates for each
suitable clues to some of the typical package in the areas of engineering,
problems that a project manager may procurement, manufacturing, despatch,
be facing at this stage. The major construction, erection, testing and
phases of the project planning and commissioning, starting from the ordering
implementation can be classified as of the main plant equipment as the zero
under : date. The major control centres which have
been identified pertain to :
Design and engineering
phase, Engineering management,
Tendering and award phase, Bidding and contracts
Inspection and expediting management
phase, Site construction and
Manufacturing and erection of equipments and
despatch phase, structures
Construction phase, and
Even though the system permits total
Commissioning phase independence to each control centre for
NTPC developed system manual for each scheduling its respective activities, tying
phase furnishing the detailed procedures to up the scheduling of interface events so as
be adopted so that the best effort is made to adhere to the end goal set by central
planning group located at corporate centre.
Finalised
MNW Allocate LEGEND : **
Engg. resources
Network L2 & schedule ** Activity ++
++Performed by
DGM(P&E) GM(E ) : General manager(Engineering)
CE(D) DGM(P&E) DGM(P&E) : Deputy General Manager
(Planning &Engg.)
CE(D)
L2 : Level 2 CE(D) :Chief Engg. Design
L3 : Level 3
Detailed Engineering
Reallocate work plan
Engg. network
L2
Respective
Respective
Engg.Deptt.
Engg. Deptt.
Heads
Heads
RT
Engg. status
IJE
Work plans L3
Resource
Departmental reviews
Availability
Decision
Departmental
Engg.review
Progress report
GM(E)
pre-award contract planning stage i.e. from manufacturing and quality status.
the preparation of specifications up to the Specified reports at regular intervals are
stage the equipments/materials are submitted indicating the areas of schedule
delivered to the respective sites by the variance, if any, their likely impact on
contractors. delivery status and any recommendation
given to the contractor and/ or
Based on the key event dates in the master suggestions for implementation. The
network schedule (MNS), detailed plan for inspection report, apart from the inspection
pre-award activities up to award of every status, also indicates deviations, if any,
contract is finalised and monitored from the quality plans. The expeditors are
vigorously. At the time of each contract conversant with production planning and
award, detailed manufacturing/field project engineering as well as
activities schedule are tied up with the manufacturing techniques. The expeditors
contract for subsequent monitoring and ensure that the delivery of components and
control purpose; the networks so finalised equipments are in the sequence of erection
become the level-2 network for controlling required at site.
the respective packages.
The inspection reports are analysed and
10.5 Contracts monitoring and control schedule variances are reviewed for
Contracts coordinators of each package decision on the course of action to be taken
to achieve the overall project
RT
monitor the progress for each work
package against the schedules drawn up. commissioning schedule.
Such evaluation indicates the cause of
IJE
Finalised MNW
Inspection
DGM(CS) DGM(CS) Manager(CS) Engineers
Quality
surveillance
Manufacturing report
status
Reallocate Quality
Manufacturing Assurance
programme
Contract Quality
schedule Assurance
RT
Deptt. Head
Contract Materials
IJE
Monitoring
Resource Monitoring (Post-award)
availability (Pre-award)
Contracts
Planning Head(Inspection
DGM(CS) Engineer & Expediting)
LEGEND :
Contracts review **
++
DGM : Dy. General Manager
CS : Contracts services Executive Director ** Activity
(Commercial & Contracts
L2 : Level 2 ++Performed by
Management)
Figure 5. PMIS Contracts services Contracts monthly progress report
quality levels is taken by the department. interact with corporate engineering group
The quality plans after discussion and to get the required drawings in the
finalisation form part of the contract sequence in which they are required for
document. continuous work for the next six months.
D
e Construction Execution Erection Execution
c L3 Network L3 Network
i
s CCM CEM
i
o
n L2 Construction Quality report L2 Erection schedule
Schedule L3
o L3 Updating Up dating
n
RT
Weekly Weekly
c Construction Erection
r Progress Progress
i Review Review
IJE
t
i CCM CEM
c
a
l
Materials report
a
c Evaluation of construction
t progress with respect to L2 Evaluation of erection with
i schedule respect to L2 schedule
v
i Site Planning Site Planning
t
i
Construction progress Erection progress
e
s
Site review
General Manager(Site)
LEGEND :
Monitoring tool :
PROJECT
Corporate Planning,
Involvement : Contracts and Engineering
Contract Packages
Output :
MNW/Level 1
Corporate Planning
Network
Level 2 Network
Project Report
Decision/Actions
And Management
Project site
summary of corporate
Monthly
Progress Report
1.Corporate
2.Contractors
3.Different departments
at project site Critical area identification
1.Site Contracts
Site management
Department
summary
2.Site Inspection
Department
Pre-award status is also discussed covering faced due to the delay, if any, so that a
the remedial measures needed and proper tie up with the vendor before award
identifying the types of problems to be of contract can be taken up.
Budget review is also made during this project sites of NTPC. The feedback from
meeting and shortfall, if any, is identified 42 survey participants from both corporate
and responsibility centre is fixed to get the and project site at different level and
different functional area were collected
commitment.
and analysed in the following way.
10.94 Monthly progress report The quality of the PMIS was measured
with eight items: accessibility, response
As per the system, a monthly progress time, flexibility, ease of use, querying
report is generated from site indicating the ease, learning ease, systems integration
quantitative progress and physical progress and multi-project capability. Each of the
items was measured on a five-point scale (
achieved, shortfalls, reason for shortfalls,
Very high quality : 5, High quality : 4,
measures taken to overcome the shortfall, Moderately high quality : 3, Less than
further help needed, if any, from top level, moderate quality : 2, and Low quality : 1).
various achievements and targets and plans The result of the questionnaire survey is
for the next month. furnished in Table 2.Under ideal condition,
maximum point to be earned against each
Very important point to be noted is the characteristic is 220 [5(maximum point as
per likert scale chosen) x 44(Number of
column items requiring prompt attention
survey participants)]. For total 8
through which site expresses its difficulties characteristics, maximum points to be
for the management at corporate centre in earned is 1760 (220 x 8). Total points
RT
achieving the proposed plan for the next gained as per questionnaire survey result is
and the help needed in overcoming the 1408.Therefore, the quality of PMIS is
problem. 80% effective as per the users feedback.
IJE
Flexibility - 34 10 - - 166
Ease of use 29 15 - - - 205
IJE
Querying - 32 9 3 - 161
ease
Learning 26 16 - - - 194
ease
System - 26 12 6 - 152
integration
Multi- 12 30 2 - - 186
project
capacity
Total points : 1408
Note : Figure under each column (column No.2-6) indicates number of respondents opted
against criteria mentioned in each raw.
Note : Figure under each column (column No.2-6) indicates number of respondents opted
against criteria mentioned in each raw.
per scale)
Contributed to meet 30 14 - - - 206
project deadlines
Contributed to meet 28 16 - - - 204
the budget
Contributed to meet 32 12 - - - 208
quality
specification
Total : 618
Note : Figure under each column (column No.2-6) indicates number of respondents opted
against criteria mentioned in each raw.
The outcome of this research paper is [7] Fox, J. and Murray, C. (2003).
determination of unique project management Conducting research using web-based
information system which can be useful questionnaires : Practical, methodological,
benchmark for any organisation for project and ethical considerations. International
RT
[12] PMI (2000). A guide to the project success. International Journal of Project
management body of knowledge, 4th Management, 26, pp 213220
Edition, Newton Square, PA : Project
Management Institute. [15] Shenhar AJ, Levy O, Dvir D (1997).
Mapping the dimensions of project
success. Project Management Journal,
[13]Raymond L. (1987). Information 28(2) pp 513.
systems design for project management : A
data modelling approach. Project [16] www.careclimatechange.org.accessed
Management Journal, 18(4), pp 94-99. on 12.05.2013.