You are on page 1of 10
6 The Manin of ig demented mene on fang SSE ail ear Wingate bre Tec iniemyerofomny on py he ar ten be enya ayo ing hat a ‘iC hg mar ot Soros mia we cl er ea ted es ngs Tie eetlpenctap theese ch Weg Teall ct coe np san sep pe TRE a py ed ae he pep cacti nat alg cis cng Sore raatbane cha we cll val py SUES sa a ang ntti +e. SAE lice ea an tri dss ep ep Sh Sc eli es ero enn SESREE rn bee be ead i ae a Cite bate fl eg ‘Odysseus and the Song of the Sirens Revisited. Reflections on the Relationship bbeeween Masic and Philosophy Jo Peo Cachopo ‘dks. And dough sdncedy ch a hg ar ner hap al ‘Sree mcanemig ply ve nape gg Sc eaecemone “The powe of musica long perplesed i inet I ubiquity and overelming influence, however, have probably never been 3 conspicuous as today. Thus thought Lacoue-Labarthe, whe rejected ‘he sumpeion ha wei ody orale inc tela decade of the ‘wet entry ins world xed withan minted min by mage nse one might be forced o admit theft that "mse [--Tharconsinsed to invade our word and hace een presence overall other ar forms, inclodng the visual at ~ he fact that, ‘muscolaty” as taken up where lat lof In the conte of contemporary capitalism, Lacouc-Labarthe sugges, thee are good ‘round fen thatthe power of mini mote dangerous consieting 5s poten es and influence, than that ofthe ener ards dere spar cra a or some wr of undpoofing mle he uf eS Te Cap Sr a 2 lp asec, Mf Fe Wer Chin omic stem Ben el Unenay ea peat as Te Menno ening Ane yt the effort might be le, fr earn Pascal Quins Foxmala, “haven eye's The aor of La Haine de le mine ths pe Lacoue Labarthe’s appa a rane hora one; fo Quid "he infin of put (cere inv ception clon bua lio Me, he mains, ngs into sheen thne whom ic trams, chasing chem by mean of singing The Sten one Uys ads (oe i Greek meaning path and singing 2 these ime)! only because i ings to ight the ely of mii at the dining i oft power he mh of Ucn and the Ses hat ngiably os noe ofits petinene This not oy however hat [nterprcaton, what might coud be tence sd fr ll (Gd spr the sim ofthat show how over ach a8 sumption would be). In any ese, according 40 Quigan, being bigtou, contagious and inelutbl, msc would engender mora helene Infact, Uta to ort ox atonal rate in onder nt 10 Ell prey tthe Sten. Nevethls, third not prevent i fom Tseng ts and enjoying. the song of she Sens, Flloming Circe Adie he file histo cas with wax and ad the ind hi the ‘hi's mast. Only becuse they src obeyed his orders Giorgi Mle cue, whie rowing ait x pole sway fm the Ses) Sid thy eur Ups td teenie ew aor sae our. Ginen ta he domination of mature (bo exer and eral) sd ce ae nercblyentngled in this myth, ot surping that it became an allegory forthe cling process in Adorno nd Hevkimer's Die der fing Wh cig poe mind wi al fn a se ‘eo Si amar [None wn a a Rogen cp Hanae iin i AT Seta pup dl esi cote ng somli 1 Pain Le in desi PCa 99). Ue JP Cap dnd te Sng oft Seid 9 rete slgey ofthe dt of eligi [The rae ‘Spent ale mane Nop of Sion renal ra ped yoy pre Spade pty a hn oh ch coca of pe” Reason and domination tavened history — the liter beng insu the fmt So co praphise two of he bee own ‘hese ofthe book if mth ws already enlightenment (a prarous ‘vay to come tyr wih dhe url and overwbeling power ‘fF nature), enlightenment migh arn tay ito mythologies as he Souda beeen atonal and blind isramentay became aed ‘ove the cour of modern) 'A ths point shoud be noted tha, rigrouly speaking he ‘efeencs othe myth of Ulin Dilek der Aura ate not ‘do with music le far fom i Is undeniable, however ha the ‘diet ofthe enlightenment vee al apt of ule! a ad arclry music, i obvi no an exception. Furthermore, the ‘qutions raed by Adorno and Holmer are fi from being inlevat othe dixon I im o deep in the following gs For tow, let simply adm that inthe meatie Ulyscs, a ie wee Iectme 1 mican hms (2 Knd of human Orpes) es that he came to be not only vii” ofthe power af msi, but alo is mse” Mis theo aoBecrme an instrument ia his hands of rat, of expenion, of plete, of eduction, athe expense, wo be ruin, of being rtionally developed at pela, prey sonic Langs “Taking ino acoune the fice that music Belongs to larger cakurly heterogeneous, cing proce ie undeniable that the alee berween reason [ra"] and sensi, or sentiment i recerereree ee ee eee Ree errant ere ot 0 Te Menino Meni [seni] as Mio Vic de Carvalho psi ans hough the story of music in gute comple way This empty consis et and foremost in thea tht bod ples Belong ogee by viru ite pardons, of hi opposition end comply Sicha pardon might Setephn flows, On the on and, nly gn he backgroud ‘ofthe opposition bercen seston ad sentido thee nomen in ‘heinioyof music become inelig, arrebelion fof agunt ‘he reduction of mii o numer ort absorption by beached ooventon of sexheric and politcal nature. On the other hand i ‘gable ale snce Max Weber's Dieratoaln und ialegichen ‘Grondlaen der Mus thar ignoe the conibtons of reson to the dolopment of musics means of expression in other word the compli beween tional deopment ands expres ripening ould lead only mizundertanding the hry of mai ome dhe fscinaion i might and 0 often did and dos ens. 2. The hatred of pilosophy Pilsophers have lng ben among the lees unt with ‘music. Anda est since Plato, he ave Ben keen acd i power alt init diferene, Fro concn, manner Be with Ainrase or ems, they soup to cncompase music in thie Pilsopicl acount of she world In wo dang, however thy alo tended ocqute musics bing nosing br another bj of ingiy. ren Schopenhauer, who famouly pra musica th highest aie foum ~ indeed, asthe unig, afr athe ld of ai concer unmedaed maison of the Will was ot fram “aig” mc Seemmernts antag cia Boccia (teeta Apo 1 are Ate lenin of en Dn Marine Som ih in ay 1.0 hap: obo eget Si ied 38 pve touchatone with which o bul up his pilsopica system. Viewed a such, che tendency to ym an though the sory of philosophy. Drie a ish dingo i poably now ichou exception Init, a Anew Bowie eins nce into sn be i ewe ac sa ol ge i i (OSs tet ens Tt ny ae ips Simms ps oat Quite specially, wile menconing “contemporry profesional ilsophy" Bowe has in mind the sppeoach of malt plow ‘whom he blames for natrowing the debate on he eltiothip etween ‘usc and philosophy, and hindering the insight “the patie af ‘lsophy ee aho part of whats abe man, which, ke mus ‘may play 4 worlddiclosiveroe™” Contry to them Bowie ib partly intersted in highlighting abe pts it, “he power whi Imusic ha 1 connect ut f0 the wold in many dieting ways [Aldsough chi view might sem anal oo optima way of puting the power of asic in perp ir ately ore alleging than the liitenc o ak such ar dfning the concep ofthe mu arework (vith eat either wo the sore performance), or denouncing the Alege ison inherent i anigning meaning to musics which Plilsophes in pardclar might well cope with Tallow mye co Suge jst as human bing in generale wih chickenpox (wich now forbringan amon any din eat as though ending to become more serie a ane grows up) Indeed, a Bowe piso swell, 2 at Ma Pp nd dey Ci Cae ae. Thain of Mein Amiel, one of dhm i the cawinement of knowledge and domination, of which pilsophy might rum oat to be = cider _metaphilly or postvisially— the uimat expen. This brings sco ise der fdr. in which Adorno and Hotline ‘who ioicaly hime “the word sigan nay judgement ‘obethe only surviving deeam of cence atemptd wp fward raion risque of eso, this ang the poem of esque to 4 transcendental level Gin which cxicing the ery conditions of “aptience and thought ar at stake). Thowgh Hokies seminal isincsion between adn nd itl tewies proves toe cca Jn chs content, th atempe wo develop an immanent cq of son (and conequemly of philosophy) ifr fom bing pursed ony by ‘hors asia with che anklet School According to Fount, sich am atermpr is rather Leemaifin the work of lang waitin of ctl thinkers, ranging om Kant who bound the once of ‘Aufelrang co chat of suronomy, and thought ts moe tobe the ‘ourage o think for oneself ~ to Hegel, Mars, Weber, Nite. ‘he Frankf Schoo’s x generton and Foca ims Other, be they of he same lke Lyra) or nt generation (Agamben, or Rance, ro mention but two) mig be adel ody othe ropa ‘hor inn to engage in bo Boral and ral once fhe resent ine, Dit er Asis 44 Die of 1 Sethe Four, “Qe gure it Din dt 10 Cabo: Ob an he Sng eS id 83 nnn eet atansagredeneepegd saeco ieee in dnb men Sal cpa fara draenei pee aera ceed iylantamee to Peep reieererreny eed iis cosa close eee Peer bere ent aeeneiore coup amiew emmy Fane beset apie rarer pobepefrte eerie Tae becartan ween ete Sa ee eae Shopasitcey eae Sees eae 15 sna, ee Pap Ma am Mai Sa, 16 RR ce, “Gan Dimmer in ic Nee Rie Slowsoge Sl en, Now lr de Gre Th natn Thre a copy og ica “hd of nu” a range eon Cad el eae at Se aeeae el 4 ening ing ‘As we sll ce, the fucinatin with ence might wll be the meeting pint between certain hatred of philosophy and certain ae of ma: This conflence noewithanding wo ways of valuing Sle rom plleophicl standpoint are ob an nt scoant isintion mus therfore be daw betwen contating sence with the uproar of kbar and pacing metaphyseal God, To gasp the fst tendeny jus think of Ande! Rubles mutism afer the stage in Tova’ movi based onthe ie ard work ofthe = etary Ruan ar), or ofthe silence wating above the former oncenttation camps, and arin fom the cestimonics of Shoah survivors (in Larama’s documentary). Ar, phiesophy, and clare proved unable a prvet bri, ba orig with it sth nota Fe rein wo hap quiet ~ at eat fora whi “This has lee, i anything, ro do with the ence one mst presumably comply with when confronted with specific objets of Inquiry Tha whereof onc canot yea, eat ane mast be ent however, igh alo be taken a a way of citising piles all ‘compas ambition. Noneteles, whitest dhe former way of ‘vioning sence qustions and erties phioopy's compa dive to dominate at sich (whl intimatng ts Knsip to ott, nome cursive, Forms of veer), he later spy diplace ich a dive, (Clb nd Gai Pen ine fsb = Tac W. eae cen deieeei emer see tet Then Wm eS, 1» Ini Wtmnin at gr hep, Chas K pen deat tenant ‘hsp pra of meapaopte’) aera ‘Spewmnn of Wi phy a ine omer ‘Sign pa is pcan ro dein ch ‘ols pace eg Pp gs a ‘ume Cone EM Arc Onn acd, 1M Cub: Ob henge Sif WS Phin fa 8 is ania end concerned wil ep playing ie Tunny games, though excaing fom the playground ay sorta bjs or problem dened ~howeve slg mcepyscal innate 3. The hated of mie Since ime immemorial mac ne to innumerable wee served ara meanof hunting of pa, of plea, of expesion. Taking (the frm of calrbind ataced to il, Later on ae meas of ‘preion gradually attained an unexpected degree of wrengh and {Sblry and human hunger Became increasingly more complex, ‘music fund isl chasing, not birds any more tthe inhabits ff the firmament above them ~ the gods, the ablute ise [ecoringly the qurion may sin of whee he Homeric mh 3b (Quignard hazard does noe convey is tru meaning by means of is pa fing he pe iin moe witch tye by mf sialon amen Tease ch nse ne Mn Sp wc i The Sm Uk a et et oe dare oko wed Teapot ore gel Se lomckciu cic a rts esha eoth ‘Shen, pauses coronene os nt {Saeed ci eon Qi Le ae de ei, a 6 The Manin ening Temi discussed whether composers have acu “lard” the olte whether by expressing it musically oF by taining an tboltely musical way of expen oching a all, le alone the tse. any case. the change (90 mater how ccf was 0 neces forthe beer ~and thos some compen tuned again Td Barwa ole Cataophe othe endo tne co tthe ttle of Mesaes uae had ley eaken place and ms ong swith the ther arte could oe prevent hi Bri coed wth ‘Worse, priate in it~ the very mai with rgd to whi the chim to beast was pnealy made in partic And tht we ive Soymon Las a Pash univer om Athi. who played in nde A shi condcte is there ochora caring hi though on ‘heft that masie~ that mosesblime exprion ofthe human ii ha became entangle inthe lish enterpri of the exertion a tile of rople and even tok native pat in hs xerminaton’# No wander tha itis with Las cxpeence in mind — and oosierng hit inclination to think that music demoraled the Prisoners, rather than giving them eng ovr ~ that Quand tes the expesin “the ated of music by which he sek "eo convey ‘he degre to which mai my become bjt fated for mene who has lowed is mach" In the same vein, Lei refered “the Typos of the interminable yh, which il dough and deadens pula, and anacined the mi played in Ka-Be wih he vie of the {ge Iineingo which Lvs companions mahal ike sutomatons “thee ol te dead and the mac dives them, ie che wind dees ead even, and taker the place of thir wilh" Lents and Tak ‘exprenes were creme bower ee parly, oth Toy ble him, and Jake afer him gave expres oa ir irs t regs sie: Tltoy reported hae remake that "wherever yo 2 Soman aa Maer od am Cher ron i Norio aca 1 Qapunl faerie 3 Rete Mon So LP Cah: ob ego eR) 387 rat sae, you ned at mach misc a pond his very night pervades a one knows, The Kieu Sonat. Janke, for hie Part wondered about musics pouible Kinship with awlogy and ‘erey vn clanesine caus “The question hur aries whather the grounds for icing music sre subtanial rahe than mer Gcumstaa Mais bins power ‘oul ie ints inasive mata in i resnblecapiy to ede, ‘manpulie and core. Othe thesld of deh = ina concetraion ‘ap ~ the human boy i al ules och sl ~ abt ‘swing and die the annilacon of any sot of hope sponds (bey) 0 manic, at dos no 0 hike Lak, Lev and Quid in thee wake, when confined witha vulval mln nce {nace Tear oo com a Rigor, ‘Speier ca in Ace Sud we therefore coche th msc neti iy? Shou music be dfn undentond aan alinating force posed to atonal ‘manciption? Should it henceforth expe the sin eee, yet ‘mine flere? Why chen mai rather than nothing? Or beet sill why no ong lence eter than msc? 4: The hard of represen Gaily enough the pall esren plop (or autonomous exoningin fener and mic nde el othe dengan of bach (mo mater bow parsexicl the wo ime my be: in eer o ace philosophy. one ster the reifng mature of concept wok in 2+ ly ain Gy. ar Dade rm ee oy Mo i ac nd efi mC nm a Qiu sane mea a The Meng Ming contrast © musics epresivty (aken a «promise of eoecionfre ‘atonal: inorder eo Blame mus one aster thatthe alienating Power af mac mark of asin the sutonomy rane by rina ‘eon 22 condi sine qua now of emancipation. Bu tis mean {the sume time thatthe adialiation ofboth rams shares nog ‘nyt moans they qual spr inshipberwen pony frm onthe on hand ands quite ambivalent cvsing proce of the other but abo, inevitably thei paral For how could bod ‘tims olde, if they at inherent contador? This si ‘must add that Lam nr suggesting darth concerns grounding those ‘tics nay be ovoked or el with sper bu ipl cha Akspte thi relevance, they cannot be abla ‘Nutt: mand, Rare smi denounced what heclean “info use"? of. conaction of concept such ap anprecnabl" "unthinkable, untae’ andiredcemable and ed Lytton ofthat sblme aon what ‘remeber abortion of contemporary at’ dye wits {he anpreenabl ie. 10 proent the fice that there i an ‘upreenabe™" Incapable of beng (e)praentd, according t yor approach, no only the oben tempo alate bok the Jews andthe acs of thei aniaton, bu also the priori tor inthe ie of the ther (hone memory the Jew woud have ep Fnac har aeacing the anger of reson” apt hie inpprheribl, sncneclable,uobedig fo Le. asia “immaterial mater, “the psece a unpresentabl the pi” Rance cep towards Lyea'hypebole, according to which unmediatd (imlmateriaty sands for a now pose Kantian, Sublime, ot unrated wo ou tpi, Boose ites against the ‘gestion that an osc, and ineacable, comply exis beech Pileophicl concpmaip pctral epracnadon and the Moodle ‘psde of Western ciation shir Lyd bis with and draws ras Rac: L Dei de img igs 201 eFC rp 1.0 Cah: bn hig SR 389 cn. pointe pounded ast may be— genealogy of aon, bt nds {Gp enacting impli enti of bah a pilspbiel and an aii tase, Ara conasenc, be somehow places whole reine not nly ‘ae bab of ough “under the sgn of aber” The pein of the unproentble, which i tantamount 10 anathemaing, ‘representation i criicable for exactly the sme remons why the {olution of the coms raised again concepraaity and Imoscalsy ured out tobe problematic: crs we of concep {eae instrumental, muni (eg manipulation) and eprescuaion {Goa is ileal ae be eye apc tiae 4. Intel, lo inte “Te pall betwen the unpesentbl se from chest of visa at and isso fr undefined mas counterpart is worth ‘raining more dose: The following quston sees nevis what ‘inthe id of msi the analous notion tthe mpm The ‘gation is ot cy ake, bees the ndon of epsentation i ror prbleasc when comes odscsing mu Be that my, Ind” conserng the constation formed by notions such a npresenable'sTunspeatabl", “unthinkable, and sence", ii ‘erp eo aad tha thine, concep by fk, ‘Hands for the musical equlent to the unprsenale™ Some ‘onertalstion needed inorder to ponder sc hypbai ‘One of Jnkevic’s in ois in Le Maine Fine is sub thar maces inapable of repcsensing anything a all ‘Nonetees,jnkdevitc’s potion i nox without ambiges Mac, ashe ir keene ast as no meaning: consequent cams of broth an ethic and » metaphysir of music ae equally misleading. ‘Music Eni” in Junkie wor inexpenie. And yet so he Manin Meni ‘musi’ neresivene ie mos mh in hat expres oti buchen th tmp nnumcae poss of epee This ews is cuit che extent that an ultimate meaning seme ‘fntaly o ge leting mention in the books muse wld onder Imani the ine aaeate ofthe hunan experience of tine, which ‘baby why Jnklévec, ight at dhe begining of his bok, foto ‘he “mul Charm” ems fs pot at ht hs time ly dimension and cds cing that mis el oot Pregnant music may appear in Janke’ characertion, ssl emai an at feign 16 the world of representation. And yu 4 coca diference sepurtes Lyon's "unpresemble™ from Jaklvich’incable whereas the concep of unpresentbe ee finan foremost to rents which ae noes such dope ‘he representational abil of visual ae the nson of ine” nares an incacabl carci of mac el, Besides this ~and more ‘cally =a certain optimism seems t futher erage Jnl approach fom Lyon's According t0 the former “the mystery ‘eased ous by musics not death's ering inexplicably but thee inept of if freedom, or ew” wa ht “among ‘the promis made by neil hope of a aa tht has be ve ous Thing musica gute ambiguous et of notions sich Sow, and charm, he oes af im ca “msl rape ‘san ape fim immanenee and thats soulencanedby mas] seein" Silence, 00, plays an important ole in his argument just at “music renews it stent the foun of lees” 0 would ence "ake on musa form a measles” ~ provide, of eure, 2 nich, Man he ie 4s i 1 hp: obo get rR 96 shat one come sanded ene aan intcrpin fae, tate han sound in general Gncing mui) a a interop of Silene Jnr eas eds the fat ha he ls = ops not ~ to ats wha pail and holy a wake fn mus’ ncntatry power 6. Beonen silence and seneing So viewed, Janévich's approach to sence kes close chan Quigna's to Lyons pointe acount ofthe “unprsentble Indeed aber hn poiing wo the mysteries of time or fnctioning + 1 *aetsary condition for contemplation,” silence, 10 bene Quins, The Mt hve cops hss Wn — ill by an Amen ar ich cfs nd a or bce le i fe They tt ie rte de ig smc espn ers Wa fe SOE tbat w pa fab ne of no, et Sheth Boe cenpene pion dar gs toad de ‘seit tee onion iy of ch eh pe et selves Se he nde ml enboirt f cl es Sop ve ieeetranr te dayotmne 1 lpn, mr ay Th me 1» Jn end ele 2 Rime tate el mae wo he Maing of nig seme tere hens ot ie mai ll ‘loc ph dt mut - Romane man prs hh Sey dee compe kere nd geal petals st cen on ete pop ‘ti sme ne uaa fr om beng eae theme npn An ota up-c rm minha [Enos bowen tees the ‘eam ed's map ae wy cel Sryesal nn re prominin ere see Cops sino ly She permana rUhan ‘Sipe qy lding ne cel fig ‘ES han coon thr Rnd sham fm Cn on omar cece incontray mic eee may ye ot tle borin mal ok an shal pa mst ost oper an an Nevo Papen Ar Daa" a weit Ca Seton cf pti mesic ning eae tetionde verte mel adh ta Th Semen an ecaneenl and we te Sal opon Coceng of era oe al ‘Contamina rr en pone un en hw ce a pie aig Speer chika Comer a oe ‘nk cD Mero We'd Scr Seth he bon inp ny a eg eh Soest ecloreinterean ion ace a ‘elegy mal Romani el enn pall ran nt pom Tc paleo stool {Jt Cape“ Main Sa, Lend in den tn eo 4 Dee "Malan ae hea tiny 93 1.0 hap np te Soft Son Reid 9 seen the other side ofthe coin of the sense thatthe calminaton of thebestof blame throughout the bloody Zoune of the ewenteth century. But dow he critique of masial Seshetcnm ~ denoped in onder to expite ms’ strc ul inert ints encraling power to engage lene bth corporeal td poycholopially~ jsf the enthoning of ence at 2 musical pin? “The anv, teas min, an be but nei Sil on she ther hand oe i llowed o wonder wheter the burden of poo ha oe ‘en inetd along the way. Some aspect Cages ppach sence Suge ths alo an acouatichaiaon api wich one sini ‘olson othe pre, unmedined, mater of ond (of posi and ‘mythical aude on) doe ot sencur ino a moder mythology {Swall Buthermor tot alence eerbert,e ms remin aie {pole which appli lene and nt ud to pelos aie Sorina way. Dogs Ka pointed out [ben he (Capel speaks of ‘lence he lo sea of wlening” "Bur ience comes 0 bave ‘encing ec the brie berween “ast” ad “anett a Vii de Cara understands the ponte connection ofthese wo ions colpe and the prac of lene revit ielogi fae. ‘Soviewed, Cage's campaign gis expresion int es poitially problematic in asic were “anarchic han Romane thon in dha might ental he “suppres ~in the el fait Communication ~ of any wionction towards something beyond the rework a ase ojet" Tha in the cate of aio work by Cage ‘he musical abject supposed wo inlde all sounds capable of being Tardis much ge of hie ai audacity «reminder hat hit tempo embrace al and ety wud in apna, open-minded, ‘emienly spectacle might eventually revere nt 3 palitaly maf snethetaton of ali. 1 Det Cape Sen Shei” Tal re Entice min” in A ag de en ag Posie os he Manin of ening cera iceicetiedmncnrenne ‘anathematising music's expresive dimension altogether, o, in extreme odin ses to hse i thon er nae Socata an vee rrecane stort Bitiregatnene ren eae hina’, bra ~ ma, “our day ape fem hing word, 7 PE A Ped sece 1 “Lenn de il” Ms Cai ie Seo oy oe Cpls: ain Ain ‘The Avant-garde Discourse in the Later Years of the GDR from the Composers Point of View Karin Sick “The compoionl pout hat were asl inthe GDR ~ from alo and ange cigs 0 a er, rn modern to postmodern aeshevie ~ have aeay been discussed by ‘mero misclogis,Howeer dis isnxthe place ope he fas {ndapumentsof dnc polcmaticdicions which over deal in my dinrtation Maha in der DDR Instead 1 woul ike to foci on the ution of how composes themselves describe thet ition in these dco and ow these dcusone on afrmation ‘the sain elo and the vane gard te he compositonl "Wen dealing wth 2th cnnuy misc itor the quoi of he van gue and compro ehniqus ix aways the center of thedsuion. Th way in which componrs wee inlcnced by vations Stic movements oft time and plement berwee aon tnd aan gals of particu inert nhs conten the sangre ‘only precio progisive and detabl, However we wil see lowing et thi notte only way in which he arin of the aranrgde wan ape ‘Sci rin was elise a pect acetic conezpt of the communis tem shat war meant to define soil carl “ent by fartering teadonal mic and the mune of sca realm Inthe GDR, scan ris wat to become the main theta de ofthe soci art, However, y the begining of he torent had become evden that soil realm could not be ‘Stabled sth leading sett concepe and thus fl shore of 1 ain ik Maar dr DO a: ab, 0

You might also like