Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Type of Data
Type of Data
1
10/4/2017
Type of Data
Type of Data
2
10/4/2017
Type of Data
Type of Data
3
10/4/2017
4
10/4/2017
Frequency Distributions
5
10/4/2017
Typical Traditional
Frequency Table
Scores Frequency
0 1
1 1
2 0
3 1
4 6
Frequency Table (Raw Scores)
5 6
6 6
7 8
8 5
9 5
10 2
11 3
12 2
13 1
14 1
15 2
Total 50
6
10/4/2017
Parameter
Population Sample
(N) (n)
Mean µ M
Variance σ2 s2
Standard deviation σ s
Correlation coefficient ρ r
DATA
7
10/4/2017
Frequency Distributions
8
10/4/2017
Distribution Table
X f
5 1
4 5
3 8
2 4
1 2
9
10/4/2017
Distribution Table
x f xf
5 1 5
4 5 20
3 8 24
2 4 8
1 2 2
10
10/4/2017
Distribution Table
x f p % cf c%
5 1 1/20 5 20 100%
4 5 5/20 25 19 95%
3 8 8/20 40 14 70%
2 4 4/20 20 6 30%
1 2 2/20 10 2 10%
20 1 100 cf(100%)/N
where:
p = f/N
% = p*100
cf = cummulative frequency
c% = cummulative percentage
Scores Frequency
0 1
1 1
2 0
3 1
4 6
5 6
Regular Frequency
6 6
Distribution Table
7 8
8 5
9 5
10 2
11 3
12 2
13 1
14 1
15 2
Total 50
11
10/4/2017
12
10/4/2017
13
10/4/2017
Example:
Group 1: Group 2:
23 36 36 38 43 56 56 56 50 55 55 58 60 62 65 70
57 58 59 59 60 65 66 68 79 80 81 81 82 82 83 85
70 77 78 80 86 89 90 91 85 89 93 103 104 107 108 117
27
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
28
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
14
10/4/2017
Class Size
Sub-Class
• 20 - 24
• 25 - 29
Discrete data
data for sub-class 20-24: 20,21,22,23,24
class size =5 (24-20+1)
Continues data
data for sub-class 20-24
class size =Upper limit – Lower limit (24.5-19.5)
=5
29
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
Frequency
Sub-Class
Group 1 Group 2
20 - 34 1 0
35 - 49 4 0
50 - 64 8 6
65 - 79 6 3
80 - 94 5 10
95 - 109 0 4
110 - 124 0 1
Total 24 24
30
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
15
10/4/2017
12
10
Frequency Group 1
6
Frequency Group 2
0
20 - 34 35 - 49 50 - 64 65 - 79 80 - 94 95 - 109 110 - 124
End of Distributions 31
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
16
10/4/2017
Histograms
17
10/4/2017
Polygons
18
10/4/2017
19
10/4/2017
Frequency
Observed Real Limits
Midpoint
Limits (mph) (mph)
Event A Event B
40 – 44 39.5 – 44.5 42 5 3
45 – 49 44.5 – 49.5 47 9 12
50 – 54 49.5 – 54.5 52 18 26
55 – 59 54.5 – 59.5 57 27 33
60 – 64 59.5 – 64.5 62 35 37
65 – 69 64.5 – 69.5 67 26 39
70 – 74 69.5 – 74.5 72 25 30
75 – 79 74.5 – 79.5 77 16 24
80 – 84 79.5 – 84.5 82 15 23
85 – 89 84.5 – 89.5 87 10 18
90 – 94 89.5 – 94.5 92 4 5
Total 200 250
20
10/4/2017
Bar graphs
21
10/4/2017
22
10/4/2017
Scores Frequency 20
18
0-2 2 16
14
3-5 13
12
6-8 19 10
9 - 11 10
8
6
12 - 14 4 4
15 - 17 2 2
0
Total 50 0-2 3-5 6-8 9 - 11 12 - 14 15 - 17
scores
45
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
ATMA 2.60
FKM 2.88 FS
FKKKSA 2.90
FP 2.99
FPPSM 3.02
FKSG 3.14
Universiti 2.89 46
* inappropriate statistical extrapolation
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
23
10/4/2017
100
88.4 89.5
90
80
70 61.3 61.1
60.7
60
% (G o T )
52.1
50 43.8 46.1 46.6
40
30
20
10
0
FSKSM FS FKM FKE FKA FKKKSA FKSG FPPSM Keseluruhan
47
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
4.00
3.97 3.97 Program Min Max Median
3.88 3.87 3.86 3.85
3.76
SEL 3.48 4.00 4.00
3.80 3.73
3.70
3.61 3.61 SMT 3.83 4.00 4.00
3.59
3.60 3.55
SEM 3.56 4.00 3.90
3.40 SKK 3.13 4.00 3.89
SMM 3.60 4.00 3.88
3.20
SKP 3.00 4.00 3.84
3.00
SMV 3.00 4.00 3.78
2.80 SEP 3.29 4.00 3.73
Mean CGPA
48
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
24
10/4/2017
Others 16 12 15 0
Crime Drama Info Western Comedy Others
Total 100 100 100 Entertainment
Types of TV Programmes
49
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
Raw Scores
Scores Frequency
0 1 Inappropriate Polygon
1 1
9
2 0
8
3 1
7
4 6
6
5 6
5
6 6 4
7 8 3
8 5 2
9 5 1
10 2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
11 3
12 2 scores
13 1
14 1
15 2
Total 50
50
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
25
10/4/2017
Grouped Scores
The Pie Chart
Group Scores Frequency
1 0-2 2
4% 4%
2 3-5 13
8% 1
2
3 6-8 19 26%
20% 3
4 9 - 11 10 4
5
38%
5 12 - 14 4 6
6 15 - 17 2
50
51
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
Grouped Scores
The Pie Chart
Group Scores Frequency
1 0-2 2
2 2
2 3-5 13 1
4
2
3 6-8 19 13
10 3
4 9 - 11 10 4
19 5
5 12 - 14 4 6
6 15 - 17 2
50
52
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
26
10/4/2017
Relative frequency
27
10/4/2017
Smooth curve
28
10/4/2017
Shape
29
10/4/2017
30
10/4/2017
Interpolation
31
10/4/2017
Distribution Table
X f cf c%
5 1 20 100%
4 5 19 95%
3 8 14 70%
2 4 6 30%
1 2 2 10%
32
10/4/2017
Example - Interpolation
33
10/4/2017
X f cf c%
40-49 4 25 100%
30-39 6 21 84%
20-29 10 15 60%
10-19 3 5 20%
0-9 2 2 8%
34
10/4/2017
Example - Interpolation
Stem-and-Leaf Displays
• A stem-and-leaf display provides a very efficient
method for obtaining and displaying a frequency
distribution.
• Each score is divided into a stem consisting of the
first digit or digits, and a leaf consisting of the final
digit.
• Finally, you go through the list of scores, one at a
time, and write the leaf for each score beside its
stem.
• The resulting display provides an organized picture of
the entire distribution. The number of leafs beside
each stem corresponds to the frequency, and the
individual leafs identify the individual scores.
35
10/4/2017
Examples:
Score : 37 Score : 736
Leaf : 7 Leaf : 6
Stem : 3 Stem : 73
36
10/4/2017
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Stem Leaf
2. Take each score and list its leaf to
the corresponding stem, 3
e.g. for the first data (83) 4
5
6
7
8 3
9
www.utm.my innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global
37
10/4/2017
38
10/4/2017
Exercise
• No 9, #67
• No 23, #69
39
10/4/2017
SPSS
Descriptive Statistics
40
10/4/2017
41
10/4/2017
42
10/4/2017
43
10/4/2017
44