SECTION 2.6 Shear Deflection in Beams 1, NATURE OF SHEAR DEFLECTION Shear stress in 4 beam section use 4 displacement ‘or siding action on s plane normal tothe axis ofthe beam, af shown in the ght hand view of Figure L Thir is unlike the deletion resulting from bending in ‘beam, which ie shown in the lft hand view of Figure 1. Normally defection due to shear in the usual boar Is inored boctuse it represeats 2 very small peroentage of the ete defcction, Figo 2 shows {hat the deflection de to shear increases linearly at the length ofthe beam increases, wheres the defection FI. 1 Delecton in Seam coud by bending moment, To ond by shea ak Detaon — — oe a Lana fconlever beam) 1, 2 Defecion caved by shear inceotes nearly os lrg of beam, but thot coud by bending increase os he thd power of beam length 26426.2 / Load & Stress Analysis 163 vier = 03 (ion ai) 615 90x 10 paint W510 haat | oro 3m Oe Sher ain fein FIG. 8 hear sesstain dogram. Ave to bending increases very reply asa third power of the length ofthe beam. For this reason the fcc. tion due to shear isnot an important factor except for extremely short spanr where deflection ve to Dending drops of to very smal value ‘The deflection deo to shear i dependent ently on the shear distibtion across the cross section of the member and also the valve of the shear stress (7). Figure 9 shows the shear stesestrain diagram which 's similar to the usual sesestrain diagram, alough the shear yield strength is mach lower than the tensile Yield strength of the same materia, After the shear eld strength s reached, the shear strain (e) ocreaser ‘apidly and the shear swength increstes beense. of ‘rnin hardening. 2, DETERMINING SHEAR DEFLECTION ‘The theory of defection caused by shear stress is rather simple. However, the actual determination of the shear ‘stteses and thelr distribution aco the ‘eam section (which two factors case the defection) 4s more dificult. In all case some kind of a form factor (a) must be determined, and this ts imply mater of expressing the ditesbtion of shear stress Yhroushout the web of the section, Since there is practically no sheer sess inthe lange mea, thi par. ticular area has negligible eect on the defection dus to shear (4). ‘The following formas are valid for seve types of beams and loading Sear tom wh cone ead fom fadora = 7 ra been etl ois tance abe esa of 6, = sear mad feasiciy FIG, 4 Fem factor fr sheor deen in bultap beams.simply supported beam; uniform toad (u) beam; concentrated load (P) snifrm lod (we) contecer beam; concentrated lod (P) haba total load, Ibs area of entire rection modus of elasticity in. shewr (Geeel = 12000000 ps) wy = debited load, Iby/iear in ay @ (3) Oy Walsing wor ated extenvly in the fabrcoten ond erecfon of ie teal fromed, Baty, belonzed operinent bling whic etwas contre beamt nthe upper sve, The bung wer designed basally or 0 nid see tire wih man beams dvgned plosialy nd gh Xtvaces uted to acconmades Tout 1op/aq tes ton «enforced Cencrle baldg would hove FG. 5 Beam secon for which Ee 5 opts ‘Tho slope of the deflection curve (@) is equal st each erossseetion to the shetsng strain (e) at the ‘ented ofthis cross-section. ae a factor with which the average shearing stress (su) amt be multiplied In order to obtain the shearing stress (exe) a the centroid of the erst sctons, ‘On tis bass, the form factor (a) for an beam or bor beam would be: ahha aban 6) where Figure 5 applies. Dost compute aea (A) ia ‘his formula beasase st wil cancel out when used In the formulas for shear defection,26-4 / Loed ond Stems Anatyis Both shop ond fil welding were wd ‘mens in bung the Anchen Se ‘fam, fame of the Lor Angele axed flab te Angel The soeloork wos de Signed eon earthquake rerton howe, with high manarh crying canoe Toth dteeon. Moving wary. god for nd etna the ned for sonra! ‘Soscbecng betwen bens