Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Suria Halim MFKE2007 TTT
Suria Halim MFKE2007 TTT
√ TIDAK TERHAD
Disahkan oleh
_ _ ____________________________
(TANDATANGAN PENULIS) (TANDATANGAN PENYELIA)
Alamat Tetap :
NO. 41, JALAN SS7/2, DR. MOHAMAD KAMAL A. RAHIM
KELANA JAYA, Nama Penyelia
47301 PETALING JAYA
SELANGOR.
Signature : _________________________
Name of Supervisor : Dr. Mohamad Kamal A. Rahim
Date : 11/5/2007
ANTENNA WITH METAMATERIAL DESIGN
MAY 2007
ii
I declare that this project report entitled “ Antenna With Metamaterial Design ” is the
result of my own research except as cited in the references. The thesis has not been
accepted for any degree and is not concurrently submitted in candidature of any other
degree.
Signature : ___________________
Name : Suria Binti Halim
Date : 11/5/2007
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank the project’s supervisor Dr. Mohamad Kamal A. Rahim for his
guidance, time and supervision. His ideas, advise and constructive comments have
contributed greatly in the overall project progression and in the writing of this report.
This acknowledgements also for all the individuals who assist me in their own ways
throughout the project’s completion.
v
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDMENTS iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES x
LIST OF FIGURES xi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiv
LIST OF SYMBOLS xv
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Introduction to Metamaterial 1
1.2 Objective of the Project 3
1.3 Scope of the Project 3
1.4 Summary 4
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 5
2.1 Brief Theory 5
2.1.1 Negative Index Refraction 8
2.1.2 Refraction and Snell’s Law 9
2.2 Single-Ring SRR and Double-Ring SRR 14
viii
3 DESIGN METHODOLOGY 32
3.1 Methodology Overview 32
3.2 Metamaterial Structure 33
3.3 Calculation of the Metamaterial Design Structure 36
3.4 Calculation of Patch Antenna 38
3.5 Simulation of the Metamaterial Unit Cell 40
3.6 Simulation of the Metamaterial Array 42
3.7 Simulation of the Patch Antenna 44
3.8 Simulation of the Patch Antenna with Metamaterial
Structure 44
3.9 Summary 45
REFERENCES 60
APPENDIX A - 65
ix
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
LIST OF SYMBOLS
A - antenna aperture
c - free space velocity of the light
D - aperture diameter
f - frequency
F - filling factor
g - gap
h - height
l - length
n - refractive index
s - separation
w - width
z - impedance
ε - permittivity
μ. - permeability
ω - resonance frequency
θ - angle
λ - wavelength
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
This chapter consists of the introduction to the metamaterial which includes the
definition of the metamaterial, the early theory to the negative index of refraction, and
the structure that shows the left-handed properties. Then, follows by the objective and
scope of the project which reflect the overall project’s content.
constituent materials and is the result from the inclusion of artificially fabricated,
extrinsic, low dimensional inhomogeneties.
The negative permittivity is easily obtained by an array of metallic wires and was
theorized in 1996. It was shown that the structure is having a plasma frequency in the
microwave regime. Because of its low plasma frequency, this structure can produce an
effective negative permittivity at microwave frequencies while suffering relatively small
losses. JB Pendry also theorized the structure of negative permeability which is
3
established in 1999 with split ring resonator (SRR) structure [20]. The first negative
index medium was developed when both of these structures were combined and it was
shown that the negative index of refraction is existed in the region where both the real
parts of the electric permittivity and magnetic permeability were simultaneously
negative. Typically, in a structure composed of SRRs and strip wires
Conventional antenna often limits the application of the antenna since they are
governed by the ‘right-hand rule’ which determine how electromagnetic wave should
behave. Metamaterial offers an alternative solution to widen the antenna applications
using the ‘left-hand rule’. The unique properties of metamaterial enable the
enhancement of the conventional antenna, thus open more opportunities for better
antenna design. This project will emphasize on obtaining the metamaterial structure
with optimized parameters for negative index behaviour in which both permittivity and
permeability co-exist simultaneously in the required frequency region.
The scope of the project will includes the study of metamaterial which will be
emphasized on the negative refractive index or left-handed material (LHM) and the
metamaterial structure which cover the conventional LHM. Another is to design the
metamaterial structure by using the theoretical method to find the optimized structure, to
compare the design parameter and to see the effect of varies structure dimensions on the
4
1.4 Summary
LITERATURE REVIEW
negative, its then having a negative refractive index or left-handed material. This
relationship is shown by the following Maxwell’s equation for refractive index:
n=±√ με (2.1)
Knowing that the permittivity and permeability are the only relevant material
parameters for electromagnetic waves, we can imagine a 'material parameter space' into
which all materials can be placed. This is illustrated in Figure 2.2.
7
Figure 2.2: Permittivity, ε - permeability,μ and refractive index (n) diagram [4]
Region I is where the permittivity and permeability are both positive. Since most
known materials have this property, this region of material parameter space has been the
most explored. However, the larger part of the map-three quarters, in fact has been
much less explored. This is because materials are just not so easily available in these
regions. In fact, materials that lie in the region III, where the permittivity and
permeability are both less than zero, do not appear in nature at all [4].
While nature appears to have limitations in terms of the material properties that
are found, artificially structured metamaterials are not limited in the same way. The
hope, then, is that more of the material parameter space can be made accessible with
metamaterials. An important step towards this goal was made in 2000, when a
metamaterial was demonstrated to have a permittivity and permeability both less than
zero.
8
This negative value can be explain as follows; as an example, it is often said that
the velocity of a wave in a material is given by c/n, where c is the speed of light in
vacuum. The implication of a negative index, then, is that the wave travels backwards,
as shown in below figure. An electromagnetic wave can be depicted as a sinusoidally
varying function that travels to the right or to the left as a function of time. Figure 2.3
shows that a wave is incident on a positive index material (the reflected wave has been
ignored). The greater index of the second medium implies that the wavelength
decreases (by a factor of 1/n); however, to maintain the same phase at the interface as a
function of time, the speed of the wave must also be reduced, again by a factor of 1/n.
When the refractive index is negative, the speed of the wave, given by c/n is
negative and the wave travels backwards toward the source as shown in Figure 2.4. Yet,
it would reasonably expect that since energy is incident on the material from the left, the
energy in the material should likewise travel to the right, which is away from the
interface. To resolve this, Veselago showed that there are more ways to define the
velocity of a wave. The definition c/n is well known as the phase velocity and
determines the rate at which the peaks (or zeros) of a wave pass a given point in time.
But this is not most relevant definition of a wave's velocity as we can also define the
group, energy, signal and front velocities, and these generally differ from the phase
velocity. Therefore, in left-handed metamaterial, wave propagates in the opposite
direction to the energy flows.
shaping materials so that light is refracted in desired ways (think of a camera lens or a
microscope objective).
The underlying principle of refraction can be easily understood and applies to all
electromagnetic waves and not just visible light. Every material, including air, has an
index-of-refraction (or refractive index). When an electromagnetic wave traverses the
interface from a material with refractive index n1 to another material with refractive
index n2, the change in its trajectory can be determined from the ratio of refractive
indices n2/n1 by the use of Snell's Law.
(2.2)
A measurement of the angle of the exit beam from the surface normal provides a
measurement of the refractive index of the prism. Figure 2.6 shows the refracted wave
for the conventional material, where the waves are refracted toward the surface normal.
Snell's Law shows that a material with a negative refractive index, not a material that
exists in nature would refract a beam to negative angles, as shown in Figure 2.7, where
the refracted wave is away from the surface normal.
Figure 2.6: Conventional material - the wave refracted towards the surface normal
12
Figure 2.7: Left-handed material - the wave refracted away from the surface normal
Figure 2.8 and 2.9 shows how the spreading patterns of the waves on entering
and exiting the conventional and LHM material respectively. For conventional material,
the refracted waves are spreading away on entering and exiting the medium. For LHM,
the waves are refracted in such a way as to produce a focus inside the material and then
another just outside. The radiation pattern is more a beamlike, which leads to the
creation of highly directional antennas and also may allow more antennas to be placed in
closely packed space.
The transmission for both single-ring SRR structures is plotted in figure 2.11 ,
which shows that both the square and circular sing ring SRRs give a dip in the
transmission coefficient which is associated with a negative permeability regime. The
frequency of this dip, that is the magnetic resonance frequency, ωm, is a little lower for
the square SRR that for the circular SRR. The inductance in the single-ring resonator is
provided by its square or circular metallic loop, while the capacitance is given by the
gap of the ring.[11].
15
From the result shown in figure 2.12 which compared the transmission properties
and the retrieval values of the permeability, it is noted that there is no qualitative
difference between the square and circular single-ring SRR. However, with the same
linear dimension, metal characteristics and gaps, in general the circular SRR shows
higher v alues of ωm and ωo which is due to the smaller area and the smaller side length’.
For ease of calculation, the square ring is used to compare the transmission
parameter between the single-ring and double-ring SRRs. Figure 2.13 shows the
double-ring SRR as well as single-ring SRR as discussed previously. Figure 2.14(a)
shows the transmission through the double-ring SRR and figure2.14(b) shows the
transmission through only its outer or its inner ring SRR. It can be seen that the lower
magnetic resonance frequency of the double ring as represented by the first dip
(figure2.149(a)), is essentially that of the outer ring, but with a relatively small
downwards shift. This shift is due to the additional capacitance between the rings [11].
The second dip(figure 2.14(a)), corresponds essentially to the magnetic resonance of the
inner ring with a small upwards shift. The strength of this resonance is sometimes very
small, showing that the magnetic response of the inner ring is screened by the presence
of the outer ring [11].
Figure 2.14: Transmission versus Frequency for double-ring and its isolated outer and
inner rings [11]
From the result, the advantage of the double-ring SRR as compared to the single-
ring SRR, is that the magnetic resonance frequency of the double ring occurs at a
relatively lower frequency. This leads to a higher probability for the magnetic response
to lie in the ε < 0 regime when combined with strip wires in the metamaterial structure.
Another advantage is that, the array of double-ring SRRs possesses a stronger magnetic
resonance, which might lead to a more robust LH peak for the metamaterial structure.
Wu, B. –I. et. al. (2005) also perform a comparative study of different
metamaterial structure as antenna substrate, which includes 1-D Split Ring structure,
Symmetrical –Ring structure, Omega structure and S structure. These structures are all
left-handed materials where there will be a region where n is negative and the index of
refraction is zero would occur at the frequencies where either permittivity or
permeability is zero. These structures are illustrated in figure 2.15.
18
The result obtained for each structure is represented in figure 2.16 for 1-D Split
ring structure, figure 2.17 for Symmetrical-Ring structure, figure 2.18 for Omega
structure and figure 2.19 for S-structure.
19
The result can be summarized as shown in table 2.1 is meant for frequency
between 8GHz to 18GHz., where it shows the frequency bandwidth each structure
exhibit the left-handed properties, the clean of retrieval, also the ease of tunability for
directive antenna. From table 2.1, it is shown that the Symmetrical-Ring structure
provide better directional beam and it s easier tune its permeability since it rings is
symmetrical. Thus, the Symmetrical-Ring structure is more suitable as antenna substrate
compared to others for directive antenna applications.
The radiation setup used the rod medium structure as shown in Figure 2.20,
where each rod is a cylindrical PEC structure with a radius of 0.2mm, and the length of
22
250mm. The period is 5.8mm and 6.3mm in the x- and y-direction respectively with 6
layers of rods in y-direction and 40 repetition in the x-direction. For radiation, a 50Ω S-
parameter discrete port of 1mm in length is placed at the center of the structure. The slab
of metamaterial in PEC parallel plate waveguide as shown in Figure 2.21 is used to
approximate the full size structure as to cope with the simulation limitation in memory
and time.
Figure 2.23 shows the retrieval results for rod mediums, where an electric plasma
frequency of 13.5Ghz is observed. Then, the far field radiation will be concentrated
around 13.5GHz, since the index of refraction will be close to zero in that region and
may produced a beam sharpening effect. The rod medium only give a permittivity value,
but for metamaterial the permeability value also need to be considered.
24
The radiation resulted from simulation shows that, the most directive beam is
centered at around 13.7GHz and the high power beam is centered at around 14.4GHz for
full size structure and around 13.6GHz and 13.9GHz directive and high power beam
respectively for slab, as shown in figure 2.24. These value even though is different from
expected value but still within the working region.
25
Figure 2.24: Radiated power and normalized radiation from simulation for rod [31]
Figure 2.25: The structure of metamaterial cover with patch antenna [10]
Given the structure of ordinary patch antenna and the structure of metamaterial
layer, there are three key factors to adjust: the working frequency, the number of the
layers and the distance between the layers (the grid’s spacing in the z-axis direction).
The working frequency of ordinary patch antenna is 2.585 GHz;. The substrate is 2 mm
thick, with relative dielectric coefficient equal to 2.2. The patch antenna size is 36.8
mm×45.9 mm and the feed is a 1.2 mm diameter metal cylinder, 6.65 mm to the center
of the patch along the x-axis direction.
Figure 2.26 compares S11 between ordinary patch antenna and metamaterial
cover patch antenna. Obviously the working frequency moves to 2.57GHz and the
scope of impedance is not changed much as being observed and compared the chosen
frequency of the two types of antenna.
Figure 2.26: S11 of conventional type and metamaterial type patch antenna [10]
27
The ordinary patch antenna’s directivity is 7.7 dB; after adding metamaterial, the
patch antenna’s directivity is increased to 16.84 dB. Theoretically, the maximum
directivity of an aperture antenna is
The structure used is composed of six identical grids with a square lattice
embedded in foam essentially for its mechanical properties with the following
parameters:
- a square lattice whose period is equal to 5.8mm (in the x- and y-axis
directions)
- the grids’ spacing in the z-axis direction is 6.3mm and are separated with foam
- the edge of the square grids is 226mm
- the metamaterial is placed on ametallic ground plane and is excited by a
monopole antenna between the 3rd and the 4th grids.
Figure 2.30 shows the transmission of the slab of metamaterial for a normal
incidence for experimental (solid line) and theoretical (dashed line) approach. Whereas,
figure 2.31 show the emission diagram of the antenna in dB scale (upper figure) and
linear scale (lower figure) in the H plane (solid line) and the E plane (dashed line),
which shows the emission of the antenna of the structure for the optimal frequency (f=
14.65 GHz chosen to obtain the best directivity). The result shows that the emission of
the structure is concentrated in a narrow lobe around the normal of the structure and
moreover is linearly polarized.
30
Figure 2.30: Experimental and theoretical transmission of the slab of metamaterial for a
normal incidence [7]
2.5 Summary
With reference to the literature review discussed, it is shown that the SRR
structure is an important discovery that leads to the negative permeability value that
contribute to the left-handed properties. The conventional geometry of SRR either
square or circular does not have so much effect on the left-handed properties but is
govern by the dimension/ parameter of the structure. Whereas the double-ring SRR
leads to a high probability of getting the negative regions compared to the single-ring
thus is preferable when designing the metamaterial structure. Also, discussed is the used
of metamaterial structure to enhance antenna directivity using different approaches. The
structure of metamaterial also important in determining the effect on antenna directivity
as well as the frequency range where the left-handed properties is applicable. With the
optimized structure and parameters, metamaterial as antenna substrate is a great
alternative to improve the antenna performance to suite many other applications.
CHAPTER 3
DESIGN METHODOLOGY
This chapter consists of the design methodology used for this project which
includes the description on the selected metamaterial structure, the design calculation
of the metamaterial structure and the patch antenna. This is follows by the
simulation performed using simulation tool on the metamaterial unit cell,
metamaterial array, patch antenna as well as metamaterial array on the patch antenna.
The split ring resonator (SRR) is designed to meet the limitations that the
experimental setup required due to the use of the waveguide. It was printed on a FR4
Epoxy substrate with dielectric constant of 4.4. The dimensions of the substrate and the
SRR are adjusted accordingly in order to get the desired working frequency range. The
34
SRR consists of two metallic micro strip rings with a slit (or gap) which may be
different in shape such as circular or square rings. There are several parameters that
need to be tuned including width and height of the micro strips, distance between the
rings, size of the gap, material properties of the rings, substrate and surrounding medium
in order to get the desired negative permeability property at certain frequency range.
The SRR structure is shown in Figure 3.2.
The strip wire simply a thin wire deposited on the substrate and will give rise to
the negative permittivity of the structure. The strip wire structure is shown in Figure 3.3.
The length, width and the position of the strip wire on the substrate with respect to the
SRR will have an affect to the negative index material property of the metamaterial.
Using conventional LHM, it is composed of the rings and the rods. The ring is
split ring resonator (SRR) which based on open ring (‘C’ shape) with axis along the
propagation direction that could provide a negative permeability. It was predicted to
exhibit the resonant magnetic response to the electromagnetic wave, polarized with H
parallel to the axis of the SRR [16]. Then the periodic array of SRR is characterized by
the effective magnetic permeability
(3.1)
μeff = 1 – Ff 2/ (f 2 – fm2 + i γm f ’)
In (3.1), fm is the resonance frequency which depends on the SRR structure (Figure
3.2(a)) as (2πfm)2 = 3Lx c2 / [π ln (2s/w1) r3]. F is the filling factor of the SRR within 1
unit cell and γm is the damping factor 2πγm = 2Lxρ/r or also known as losses of the
system, where ρ is the resistivity of the metal and c is the free space velocity of light.
Formula (3.1) assures that the real part of μeff is negative at an interval Δfm around the
resonance frequency [16]
Whereas the rods consist of thin metallic wires where its being aligned along
propagation direction which could provide a metamaterial with negative permittivity.
The thin metallic wires, acts as a high pass filter for the electromagnetic wave polarized
with E parallel to the wires. It leads to a plasma type effective permittivity.
2 2 2
In (3.2), fe is the electronic plasma frequency with fe = c / [2πa ln (a/r)] which
predict that the effective permittivity is negative for f < fe. By combining both SRR and
metallic wires structures, a LHM structure can be created. Here, the resulting structure
would possess negative effective refraction index in the resonance frequency interval
Δfm
The calculation of the S parameters can be obtain using the following formula
(3.3)
(3.4)
Whereas the calculation of the retrieved material parameters such as the index,
impedance as well as the permittivity and permeability can be obtain using the following
formula
Refractive index, n
(3.5)
Impedance, z
(3.6)
(3.7)
38
The antenna used in this project is a square patch printed on a ground microwave
substrate as shown in Figure 3.5. The patch antenna having attractive features such as
low profile, light weight, easy to fabricate and conformity to mounting post. However
the disadvantage of the patch antenna includes the narrow bandwidth and low gain.
In order to obtain the patch antenna with desired working frequency, the
following formula is use to obtain the suitable parameter.
c
w=
(ε r + 1)
2f
2
(3.8)
With c is the free space velocity of light, f is the frequency of operation, εr is the
dielectric constant and h is the height of the dielectric substrate.
The effective dielectric constant (εreff) can be determined by
−1
ε +1 εr −1 ⎡ h⎤ 2
ε reff = r + ⎢1 + 12 ⎥
2 2 ⎣ w⎦
(3.9)
L = Leff − 2ΔL
(3.10)
Whereas, the effective length of the patch (Leff) and the length extension (ΔL) can be
determine respectively using
c
Leff =
2 f ε reff
(3.11)
40
Finally, the ground plane parameters of the patch antenna can be calculated as
Lg = 6h + L
Wg = 6h + W
(3.13)
Figure 3.6 : The boundary conditions & waveports for metamaterial structure
(a) PEC boundary, (b) PMC boundary, (c) Waveports
The simulations are performed on the metamaterial unit cell which is the basis of
the design, on the metamaterial unit cell arrays, patch antenna as well as metamaterial
arrays on the patch antenna. In order to obtain the metamaterial structure that exhibit the
left-handed (LHM) properties in the desired working frequency region, metamaterial
unit cell with different dimensions are simulated to see the effect of the variations on the
frequency region and the LHM properties. Besides the dimensions of the metamaterial
unit cell, SRR and strip wire dimensions are varies, the other parameters such as
substrate type which provides the dielectric constant and the substrate thickness are kept
constant.
the square root of the dielectric constant. Thus increasing the dielectric constant cused
the LH peak to moved to the lower frequencies.
The studies also discussed on the effect of the wire position relative to the SRR,
in which it shows that the optimum position of strip wire should be on the opposite sides
of the substrate, just behind the SRR gaps. This position give a robust LH transmission.
This can be explained by considering on the way the fields generated by the SRRs and
strip wires interaction. When the SRR and strip wire are on opposite sides of the
substrate, the behavior of each component is not significantly affected by the presence of
the other since there is a little overlap between their magnetic fields.
On the other hand, the studies shows that the LH peak becomes much broader as
the SRR and wires are closer together. If the thickness of the substrate is reduced or in
another words, the SRR and strip wire are brought closer together, it will enhance the
strength of the total resonance, thus will increase the negative value of the effective
permeability as well as the effective permittivity due to the increase in the plasma
frequency. Thus reducing the thickness of the substrate allows the behavior of the
structure to make transition from RHM to LHM behavior [6]. This is because of the
stronger interaction among the SRR magnetic resonance as the broadening of the
negative permeability regime due to the increasing amplitude of the approaching SRR.
After obtaining the unit cell structure with the optimized relevant component
dimensions, the array of unit cell is designed for the target working frequency in the X-
band. Using the optimized unit cell structure, it is then being duplicated to form 2x 3
array as shown in Figure 3.7. The unit cell is positioned closed together with zero
sparations between each unit cell to give rise to the periodic structure of the
43
metamaterial. The simulation result of the array structure is then being analyzed to look
for any variation as compared to the single unit cell structure.
The 2 x 3 array is used since it provide the maximum number of unit cells for
this case, that can be simulated using the HFSS simulation tools due to the memory
limitation. Besides, the arrangement is also made to ensure the metamaterial array can
cope minimally with the next designed patched antenna working in the same frequency
band. Thus, the metamaterial array structure present here is to shows on any effect of
the metamaterial structure on the conventional patch antenna without emphasizing any
particular properties of interest.
Studies by Liang et.al (2006), shows that the number of unit cell used in the
metamaterial array structure give rise to the better directive properties as can be
demonstrated by the radiation pattern of the elements.
44
The simulation of the patch antenna only to ensure that the structure used
provides the working frequency within the desired band as specified. The basic
dimensions and parameters of the patch antenna is based on the calculation result. Thus
the optimization of the patch antenna structure is deemed necessary in the simulation
process to ensure that the resulted gain is optimum within the required frequency band.
The structure of the patch antenna used in the simulation is shown in Figure 3.8.
3.9 Summary
This chapter consists of the simulation result and analysis of the result which
being performed on the metamaterial unit cell with different dimensions, the simulation
result that emphasize on the subjects of the LHM/ Negative Index Medium Properties of
the Metamaterial Unit Cell, LHM/ Negative Index Medium Properties of the
Metamaterial 2x3 Array and S parameter of the Patch Antenna with and without the
Metamaterial Structure as well as the analysis on each subject.
Simulation result for metamaterial unit cell dimension variation is listed in Table
4.1. The target negative frequency regions are in the S-band and X-band respectively.
The dimensions that are made varies include the length of the unit cell which is also
represent the length of the substrate (d) as well as the length of the strip wire, the width
on the SRR (w1), the width of strip wire (w2), the ring separation (s) and the SRR gap
(g). For better visualization, these dimensions are being illustrate in figure 4.1. The
dielectric constant used is 4.4, the substrate thickness is 0.25mm and the SRR and strip
wire components which made up of copper element have a thickness of 0.0017mm
47
From Table 4.1, it shows that unit cell size, d plays an important role in
determining the frequency band in which the negative properties will lies. Table 4.2
shows the summary relation of the dimension variations with respect to the magnetic and
electric responses that contribute to the value of negative frequency regions. Noted that,
by varying the dimensions in order to decrease the overall frequency response from
higher to lower frequency also result in the reduction of the resonance strength.
48
Table 4.2: Summary Relation of Unit Cell Dimension and Frequency Response
Unit cell dimension Magnetic Electric
Response, ωm Response(plasma
frequency), ωp
SRR width (w1) ↓ ↓ -
Strip wire width (w2) ↓ - ↓
Ring separation (s) ↓ ↓ -
SRR gap (g) ↓ ↓ -
Unit size/ wire length (d) ↓ ↑ ↑
The variations as summarize in Table 4.2 can be explain using the fact that the
SRR acts as a LC circuit, with the ring acts as inductor and the open section acts as
capacitor. The transmission is affected by the SRR width as well as the combination of
changing both width and separation of SRR. SRR width affects the inductance, L of the
loop, in which smaller width means larger inductance, thus smaller magnetic response.
The ring separation on the other hand affects the capacitance between the rings,
which is also a component of total capacitance of the SRR. Therefore, reduction of s
results in a decrease of the magnetic resonance frequency. This is expected, as reduction
of s is equivalent to increase of the inter-ring capacitance (noted that ωm ∝ √LC and for
a parallel plane capacitor with separation of plates s, C ∝ 1/s) [18]. As for the SRR gaps,
the effect to the magnetic response is quite minimal. The reduction of the gaps size,
does reduce the magnetic response however still much less than the influence shows by
the variation in the ring separation.
The continuous strip wire provides the electric response of the LHM. The
simulation result shows that the plasma frequency decreases as the width of the strip
wire decreases. However, with the presence of SRR, the response becomes lower. This
is due to the fact that the SRR also respond electrically like a system of cut wires,
exhibits a resonance at frequency ωo , which can be demonstrated by closing the SRRs,
49
thus destroying the their magnetic response.[15]. However, since the variation caused
by SRR is highly dependence on the relative position and distance of the resonance
frequency and cut-off plasma frequency, we can make the effect negligible on the
electrical response of the LHM. Thus each component can be used to control the LHM
properties independently in such a way that the used of SRR to control the magnetic
response and the strip wire to control the electrical response.
4.2 LHM/ Negative Index Medium Properties of the Metamaterial Unit Cell
Figure 4.2 and 4.3 show the magnitude and phase of the computed S parameter
which is S11 and S21. The dip in the phase of S21, indicates the presence of a negative
index band. Figure 4.4 shows the retrieved index of the structure which confirms the
existence of the negative index band which lies between roughly 8.8GHz to 9.5GHz.
Whereas Figure 4.5 shows the retrieved impedance that roughly lies in the frequency
that is matched to that of negative index frequency. Figure 4.6 and 4.7 show the
permittivity and permeability parameters respectively. The negative permittivity
roughly lies between 8.9GHz to 9.5GHz and the negative permeability roughly lies
between 9.25GHz to 9.5GHz. Thus, it is shows that, the LHM properties exist within
9.25GHz to 9.5GHz regions, that is when both the permittivity and permeability are
simultaneously negative.
50
Figure 4.2 : The magnitude of the simulated S parameters for unit cell
Figure 4.3 : The phase of the simulated S parameters for unit cell
51
The electric field pattern of the metamaterial unit cell structure is shown in figure
4.8. Here, at the magnetic resonance, the electric field has its maximum mainly at the
SRR outer ring gap and in the region between the rings. While along the direction
perpendicular to the SRR plane, it is not very much extended.
4.3 LHM/ Negative Index Medium Properties of the Metamaterial 2x3 Array
Figure 4.8 shows the magnitude and phase of the simulated S parameters. As for
the unit cell structure, the dip in the phase of S21 indicates the presence of a negative
index band. Figure 4.9 shows the retrieved index, permittivity and permeability values
which show the existence of negative properties in the frequency regions of around
8.0GHz and between 10.6GHz to 11.1Ghz.
54
Figure 4.9 : The magnitude and phase of the simulated S paramers for 2x3 array
For array of metamaterial structure, the difference in behavior of the single unit
cell and array of unit cells is caused by the interactions between nearest neighbour
SRRs. In a unit cell structure, the resonance region is due to an individual SRR which
result in a single peak. Whereas on the array structure, the resonance regions are a result
of both the individual SRR resonances and the interactions between nearest neighbor
55
SRRs. Thus there is additional peaks in the phase plot which caused their LHM regions
to differ from a unit cell structure.
4.4 S parameter of the Patch Antenna with and without the Metamaterial
Structure
Figure 4.10 shows the S11 parameter of the designed patch antenna with return
loss value of -18.92dB at frequency of 9.0GHz which is within the desired X band
frequency. Figure 4.11 shows the new S11 parameter of designed antenna with
metamaterial array structure. There is a shift in the frequency regions as well as the
downshift in the S11 value. The frequency is now shift to 8.80GHz and 10.4GHz with
S11 value of -4.3dB and -7.5dB respectively.
Figure 4.12 : S11 parameter of the patch antenna with metamaterial structure
The simulation results indicate that the metamaterial structure has an affect to the
conventional patch antenna by shifting the frequency regions to different value as well
as affecting the S11 parameters. As far as current simulations performed, it is shown that
the metamaterial structure will be able to reduced the size of the patch antenna working
in the high frequency regions. As known, the size of the patch antenna need to be
increased in order to get a higher frequency band, however with metamaterial structure,
the frequency band can now be shifted to a higher value.
4.5 Summary
However, further works can be carries to see the influence of using different
metamaterial structure on the LHM properties, instead of the conventional square or
circular SRR. Varies other geometries may also be used to see how the LHM properties
will react and how the frequency band will be affected. The other parameters that is not
discussed in details in this project can also being carry out in the future works such as
the usage of cheaper substrate and metamaterial components for cost reduction. With
varies parameters influential, it is also possible to look at the potential of the used of
metamaterial as antenna based instead of as an additional structure for conventional
antenna
59
The size of metamaterial unit greatly determine the frequency band over which
the negative region will lies. Since it is shown that the miniature size of metamaterial
leads to the higher frequency band with stronger left-handed peak as compared to the
larger size with weaker or low left-handed peak, metamaterial is more suitable for higher
frequency applications.
Also since the effect of the metamaterial structure on the conventional antenna
cannot be conclude in this project, it is proposed that further works to be done to see the
improvement of antenna performance by using larger metamaterial array structure, the
effect to the antenna performance if using a few layer of the metamaterial structure on
the conventional antenna as well as the effect of changing the position of the
metamaterial structure on the conventional antenna.
REFERENCES
1. Alu, A., Bilottu, F., Nader, E. and Vegni, L. (2006). Metamaterial Covers Over a
Small Aperture. IEEE Transcation on Antennas and Propagation. 54(6): 1632-
1643.
3. Buell, K., Mosallaei, H. and Sarabandi, K. (2006). A Substrate for Small Patch
Antennas Providing Tunable Miniaturization Factors. IEEE Transactions on
Microwave Theory and Techniques, 54 (1): 135-146.
6. Degiron, A., Mock, J.J. and Smith, D.R. (2007), Modulating and Tuning the
Response of Metamaterials at the Unit Cell Level. Optics Express. 15(3) :1115-
1127.
61
7. Enoch, S., Tayeb, G., Sabouroux, P., Guerin, N. and Vincent, P. (2002). A
Metamaterial For Directive Emission. Physical Review Letters. 89(21): 213902-
1-4.
8. Greegor, R.B., Parazzoli, C.G., Li, K., Koltenbah, B.E.C. and Tanielian, M.
(2003), Experimental Determination and Numerical Simulation of the Properties
of Negative Index of Refraction Materials. Optics Express. 11(7): 688-695.
9. Houck, A.A., Brock, J.B. and Chuang, I.L. (2003). Experimental Observations of
a Left-Handed Material That Obeys Snell’s Law. Physical Review Letter. 90(13),
137401:1-4.
10. Hu, J., Yan, C.-S. and Lin, Q.-C. (2006). A New Patch Antenna With
Metamaterial Cover: Zhejiang University SCIENCE A. 7(1): 89-94.
11. Kafesaki, M., Koschny, T., Penciu, R.S., Gundogdu, T.F., Economou, E.N. and
Soukoulis, C.M. (2005) Left-handed Metamaterials: Detailed Numerical Studies
of the Transmission Properties. Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 7:
S12-S22.
12. Kolinko, P. and Smith, D.R. (2003). Numerical Study of Electromagnetic Waves
Interacting with Negative Index Materials. Optics Express. 11(7): 640-648.
13. Koshny, T., Kafesaki, M. and Economou, E.N. (.2004) Effective Medium Theory
of Left-Handed Materials. Physical Review Letter 93, 107402
14. Lee, J.-Y., Lee, J.-H., Kim, H.-S., Kang, N.-W. and Jun, H.-K. (2005). Effective
Medium Approach of Left-Handed Material Using a Dispersive FDTD Method.
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 41 (5): 1484-1487.
62
15. Li, B., Wu, B.and Liang C.-H. (2006). Study On High Gain Circular Waveguide
Array Antenna With Metamaterial Structure. Progress In Electromagnetics
Research, PIER 60: 207-219.
16. Liang, L., Li, B., Liu, S.H. and Liang, C.H. (2006), A Study of Using the Double
Negative Structure to Enhance the Gain of Rectangular Waveguide Antenna
Arrays. In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 65: 275-286.
17. Markos, P. and Soukoulis, C.M. (2003). Structures With Negative Index Of
Refraction. Physica Statu Solidi (a) 197(3): 595-604.
18. Marques, R., Martel, J., Mesa, F. and Medina, F. (2002). A New 2D Isotropic
Left-Handed Metamaterial Design: Theory and Experiment. Microwave And
Optical Technology Letters. 35(5): 405-408.
19. Moss, C.D., Grzegorczyk, T.M., Zhang, Y. and Kong, J.A. (2002). Numerical
Studies of Left Handed Metamaterials. Progress In Electromagnetics Research,
PIER 35: 315-334.
20. Ozbay, E., Aydin, K., Cubukcu, E.and Bayindir, M. (2003). Transmission And
Reflection Properties Of Composite Double Negative Metamaterials In Free
Space. IEEE Transactions on Antennas And Propagation. 51(10): 2592-259
21. Pendry, J.B. (2000). Negative Refraction Makes a Perfect Lens. Physical
Review Letter 85: 3966
22. Popa, B.I. and Cummer, S.A, (2005), Determining the Effective Electromagnetic
Properties of Negative-Refractive-Index Metamaterials from Internal Fields.
Physical Review B 72, 165102: 1-4.
63
23. Saenz, E., Ederra, I., Gonzalo, R. and de Maagt, P. (2005). Transmisión
Enhancement Between Rectangular Waveguides by Means of Left-Handed
Media. Electronics Letters. 41(13)
24. Shadrivov, I.V., Sukhorukov, A.A. and Kivshar, Y.S. (2003). Guides Modes in
Negative-Refractive-Index Waveguides. Physical Review E 67, 057602: 1-4.
26. Smith, D.R., Rye, P., Vier, D.C, Starr, A.F., Mock, J.J. and Perram, T. (2004),
Design and Measurement of Anistropic Metamaterials that Exhibit Negative
Refraction. IEICE Trans Electron. E87-C(3): 359-370.
28. Smith, D.R., Gollub, J. Mock, J.J, Padilla, W.J. and Schurig,D. (2006),
Calculation and Measurement of Bianisotropy in a Split Ring Resonator
Metamaterial. Journal Of Applied Physics 100, 02407:1-9.
29. Woodley, J.F., Wheeler, M.S. and Mojahedi, M. (2005). Left-handed and Right-
Handed Metamaterials Composed of Split Ring Resonators and Strip Wires.
Physical Review E 71, 066605: 1-6
30. Wu, B.-I., Wang, W., Pacheco, J., Chen, X., Grzegorczyk, T. and Kong, J.A
(2005). A Study of Using Metamaterials as Antenna Substrate to Enhance Gain.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 51: 295-328.
64
31. Wu, B.-I., Wang, W., Pacheco, J., Chen, X., Grzegorczyk, T. Kong, J.A, Kao, P.,
Theophelakes, P.A and Hogan, M.J. (2006). Anisotropic Metamaterials as
Antenna Substrate to Enhance Directivity. Microwave and Optical Technology
Letters. 48(4): 680-683.
32. Zharov, A.A., Shadrivov, V.A. and Kivshar, Y.S. (2003). Nonlinear Properties of
Left-Handed Metamaterials. Physical Review Letters. 91(3), 037401: 1-4.
APPENDIX A