ACES - C&S Seminar St November 2012 "Fundamentals of SS EN 1990 (aka Eurocode 0)" Er, Dr. Tan Teng Hoot 10/29/2012 Outlines 4. European Standardization 2. The Eurocodes 3, SS EN 1990 Eurocode: Basic of Structural Design 4. Some work examples '5, The impact of the change on the building and construction industry in Singapore What are “Eurocodes”? The Eurocodes + The Eurocodes area set of European Standards (EN) for the design of buildings and other civil engineering works ‘and construction products + The Eurocodes cover in a comprehensive manner the basis of design, actions on structures, the principal construction materials, all major fields of structural engineering anda wide range of types of structures and products, + Eurocodes is mace up of separate parts (58 parts in total 5S EN 1990 Eurocode: Basi of Structural Design 55 N 1991 Eurocode 1: Actions of Structures 55 N 1992 Eurocode 2: Dasin of Concrete Structures $5 N 1993 Eurecode 3: Design of tal Structures 55 N 1984 Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Structures 55 1 1995 Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures 5 1 1096 Eurocode 6: Design of Masonry Structures ‘SS E3007 Euracode 7: Gectechrical Desion ‘£2998 Eurocade & Design of Earthquake Restance ‘551999 Eurocede 9: Design of Aluminum Structures Links between the Eurocodes Benefits of Implementing Eurocodes in the EU “tay andres ascosonsessves | ee | (NES | Ns mies aa ae) [ Graeceiar nd wi dae | ‘+ Provide common and transparent bass fo fae competition — single market (removal of aries) + Leadto more uniform levels of safety in construction + tncrease the competitiveness ofthe European eulengneering firms, contactors, designers and product manufacuresin ther world-wide activites; ‘+ ‘Alow the shared investment in software and dosgn aid ‘development + Provide a common bass for research and development.10/29/2012 Advantages of Eurocodes European Standards Single suite ofstandarés ‘Common structural design rules and in a comprehensive Rational and consistent framework. Provide flexibility and opportunity to apply advanced methods (testing, performance evidence, probabilistic methods) + writen in a syle encouraging innovation and form 2 ‘common basis fr R&D incl engineering ‘Design Sndars The Exocodes ‘steal tnderés | aropenn Teil Approvals (Stee) eanzete ete) | (Cparion os prestessng Proc Standen ae) (satura ering, Bas snd apes te) ‘citon Standards (tseaaton of Coctete and Sel Sucre, et Testing Stance (Geotednca esting and Sampo.) Links between the Standards ‘Accompanying and affected documents + National Annexes (NAS) Published Documents (Ds) Client documents, such as: ‘LIA Design Criteria * Particular Specification * Other NCCI or guldance documents eg Thomas Telford, Concrete Centre, SCI et. National Annexes BSI Published Documents + Each Eurocode Part hs a National Annex which must be used in conjunction with the Eurocode Pat + National Annex can only contain parameters left open for national choice (Nationally Determined Porameters oF NPs + Values andor clases where alternatives are given in EN + Country specifi data (eg wind speed, snow maps) + Pracedire to be used when Eurocode contains aernatives, ts Anner2d «pe “ vaca SIM REE Soe os contain eferenced Now-Cantradctory Complementary Information (NCC) nthe form of: * Background tothe National Annexas + Additional guidance and expansion on Eurocades *+ Residual non-confcting information from cucent Bish Standards Os are NOT standards, but may be made mandatory by authors Uss10/29/2012 Published Documents Guide Document aaa arama] Designers’ Guides Principal differences between SS EN 1990 and UK practices {@.. Chap 2 of BSBBE0 or S411), Principal lifferences betwoen SS EN 1980 and UK practico (Gu. Chap 2 of BS5050 or BSETI0} 3) Th Eurocodes are lt state codes ike the Bish Stands, although are perhaps ite moe expy based inrelablty theory ‘Te Eurocodes embody the most upto dte research on many sepecte of structural behaviour The Eurocode states explcty many presumptions which have been oly piled or understood inthe as 2) The Eurocode clauses are stracturedin a sight ferent wayin ‘thatthey onan rincpes that must be satisfied and appleation rules that offer 2 way of satisfying the principles. hiss intended to Smt novation. 4) The Eurocodes ae also less prescriptive than the Bits Standards, wih more aspects lf open tthe designe. EB 5)» The requremants of SEN 1990, + The design station to consider fr both the uate and servceabiltylimit states + Therepresentatve values ofthe actions to use forthe diferent tarerlstterents ond defor wh hr aati wl > regiments nsitestmodefor wb ap alate spud tonne ene snide nape eng sen ‘Saatoeomete seems 90st remit nema ree ed ‘Sinden esn norma eco mnie Forester Evocode ste, atertion sown to the fol sntins, which may be aferet rom urentratorl prac + *Aetn® means lod, or an imposed deformation. tempertur ‘eas orsetlemert + “eres ot Acton" oF Action tec ae internal moment na fore, ‘ending moments, shear fores and deformations caused by actins + strength isa mechani propery ofa mater nuns of sue + “tesizane isa mechanical ropertyofacressection ofa member or ‘rember ostctre, + "txcton coveralls cared out forthe physical competion ol ‘theworkinduding procurement, theinspetion nd documentaton ‘thee The em covers wort ote tmay ao sgiy the fabreston of eamponents stand tel subeequant erection ons. 1.6 Symbols 2.0 THE REQUIREMENTS ‘atone * Permanent Acns (6) + vata Azone (0) + eientt Acton (A) + snore ton Ad Representative Ves of Aatons * charac vv ‘Conbinaton Vie of Vite Acton 918) + Fete einen 29 ‘Chpemerntaumore twtr naa J) Fundamental requirements * safety; serviceability; robustness and » fice Note:The ander ager et rth tthe ‘acura nscale Sept ae UE Reliability Management Design working life Durability Quality Management Fundamental reqi ments Fundamental requirements > Saety requirement the struct dings etendd fe wit propriate degrees lab ona ecnarie Wo, wi susan ‘tons ond inbences kt to ceur ding execs an se > Somes equement- the evacurecring slated fe wth Sonropiatecererofressblty ardin a economie way wl emai rth use or wnich Wired10/29/2012 Fundamental requirements Fundamental requirements D> mabestness requrement—the structure wil net be damage by evens {vera elon impacto ttet propionate othe oil D> abner equvement contd) ‘512080 ies pings fr bnting potent damage by 2 numberof ‘meaning pide efmitingo reducing the zack to white structce Eonae abject 1 tect acura frm wich slow Senstvty the haar ‘nnd * flecting ctrl frm and dein that an suriv adecuately the ‘cvetlemaval of an Indl member or» med prt ofthe rue or the aceuence of acceptable locased damage; 1 cg fr possible structural ystems tat can cle withost wameg + Senge static members together Fundamental requirements 2.2 Reliability Management 55211580 te fst operational code to recogni the pss of aby Fre requramant =the scr esitance sal be adequate forthe Se re a Serene Cease "equa pero of tine. The peer betes to bt i with respect tothe nd an soca, nebowng property the ‘aronment, or rect expose prope. ro iy dierntation cores the measures tended for hesoo- econonicoptsatian ofthe reseurces tobe ued to bul canst wets ating nt acount the expeced consequences offal ond the Jeo site constuction wots ein tlre ta 5 EN 1990: Are forthe management of structural etabity of construction wots ar ferentition by lab nde; ‘modfeatin of part aos ‘design prison teenie; Inspection during erection Reliability Management (contd. ‘The choice ofthe levels of elit for 2 particular structure takes account ofthe relevant factor, ning + the posible cause andr mod of attaining ni state; ++ the possible consequences of failure in terms of risk to life, “C2 | ean caiwauncs boa a aman | Rea injury and potential economical losses; |e tiet belie" > a catia +public perception offalure, and soclal and environmental arene isnot cemotartes Condon ina para ocston saan + theexpens and procedures necessary to reds the rk of ‘fahre, “GET [Taw cevarqenns rao human Ue, ayo be [Sangcccesteancnagae”” [mma eer eames10/29/2012 2.3 Design working life 2.4 Durability eden working ie eth pad for whicna Rrocture or pat oF uTO De edo sitence prpee wth scpatea mlnenance bu tha ma eps being recess. ee SS ne tion design working ee ee fore seen of dr actons fee win earns cnsieration of mater property deterioration ee. ate, rep: etalon ofthe ecyde cast and development of sintenance svatepe, ihe arbiy ofa acre opr afin enamel such ae Tessin fe forse dung the den wanting even appropri sinenance The str designed sich away tat etrration shou romp the dct and perfomance fhe ctr, Intvlted taerstabeconsiered ie: paorsnc rin ‘Hh inane dug eed 2.5 Quality Management Section 3 Principles of Limit State Design norder to provide estruaur tat orespond to th eqeents and te sumptions made in the cesign, appropiate quality management * deftion ofthe eat egies; + orgaintonl meses, + eonzls atthe sages of dese, xeon use nd msntenaee. 0 3001:2000 a capable bs for quity management measures, wher icone (0 anon sal ye mate Between timate it states and (2) Vereen of ae af thew categories of ent tts may Be ted Provided hat stent norman alse to prove hat sted bythe cones yp un tats sabe retest des stations is) ese tuations shoud dase ws parsstnt, anit or 6) Vetetion oft states htt concerned with time dependence {ee fate shold be reltdto the design worn ea the 3.2 Design situations Limit State Requirements ie ewe iy aon ati meen eg once pe oxen stunned ons Sconce anton, hen et condom apical tothe sure eit rin hat ne So apts deg stow nb SAFETY of pape fostrutare resistance stability SERVICEABILITY “functions comfort appearance DURABILITY fatigue10/29/2012 Verifications Ultimate Limit State DIStoN STATIONS ent trwesiont, avcidemial, nemanie rupture pen i ae AGENTS collapse ry, wid sl ext. ‘ACTIONS G loss of equilibrium Foo pres pera, grou accel. commnarioys Ov actions 4 ais they w eco soe EFECTS forse, aon, dpa transformation into a mechanism Jfaiture caused by fatigue Serviceability Limit State Limit State Design deformations vibrations cracks damages adversely affecting use ‘Stand lod odes selec mathential)| ing desig vas fo etons + materi or pode properties + geomeneat dia Lond cei shoud bo sled ening + oad erengenents + posable ditions fa eased crecons ne pois of ots + str af formas ne imperfections tha shuld b consid smuleneous Design Procedure Verifications at Limit States REQUIREMENTS 1 [7 Wirere tar stares [Senvceanny crstares} ULTIMATE + Resistance: or of tons KAS Re reine + Stace equilibrium : dialing actions Bua SEs biting actions SERVICEABILITY + Cuiterin C: lyr efet ESCs deg tern10/29/2012 Probabilistic methods - Alternative Section 4 Basic Variables | a ea as ese se heey] [eee wr |e] es cr ee fate 41.1 Clasiction of actions: + permanent G: se-welht, shrinkage, setements, Drestesing P(mporedforceleformation, + Variable Q Imposed oad, win, snow, temperature, + ncidental A impacts, explsions, seme ations... NOTE: water may be permanent or variable ‘0, wind setae actions may be variable or accidental by origin: direct or indirect ty tio fixed free *by nature orstructaral response tate or dyname 4.1.2 Representative values of actions 4.1.3 Other representative values of variable actions mean ae if cnbilty sal: yy Pa ‘appr orlower vl aay nt sl = Ghay(S % race Pay “Ging 95% rc L probly of excedene S19, Pag Qn tmati actions: reba excectence2 ar) “AB, tsi tons) nomial alae esi for nnd poet ‘Combination values YQ, "for altima lint states of permanent and transiont design + forbroersible serviceability lini tates Frequent values 0, (during 1% ofthe reference period) ‘or ultimate in soe of mong accidental actions ‘or reverbl sericea ii ses permanent values 0, (eg during 50% ofthe period) or line lint tates oobi accidental ations “or revertble sericea lint states cr 4.2 Material and product properties Section 4.3 Geometrical data ‘lower anectrativaue (6 et) oe rover charset alee GS ce {\ j= limes patentee bX i wie Nye > whe iio da eatin agua vats if epee (igus) ~redchen rete Representative values + characteristic values (a preseribed fractile) ‘where statistical distribution is suiciently known + diretly design values (e.g imperfections) ‘Tolerances for connected pars ({rom diferent ‘material shal be mutually compatible10/29/2012 Section 6 Verification by the partial factor method Design Values 6.1 General 6.2 Limitations 6.3 Design values 6.4 Ultimate limit states 6.5 Serviceability limit states Ultimate limit states Ultimate limit states "EOU [Loe of aa equi of he auc or any par oT sored ae il body, nw [minor variations thw va rth spatial istebution of ‘adiona am a single souren ve eigen “tha etangte of eontuslonmataril ground re general ot govern SWE erat ble Sst coclcers neti footings pls, benno val et, which ‘rng ot consruston materia or axcxsivadeermaton [sft structure govern ‘GES Pal or oxcosire doorman oT roe wlio [rengthe of el ortockoresgrtvant prowling | Examples of ULS ‘Section 6 Verification by the partial factor method Desig stations Veriitione Persistent [vernal is sus anit fates oe hn ig [nen ot oa pce er eos — [ae 1010/29/2012 Representative values of actions ULS transient and persistent design situations “nee choices may be made by the NA for ‘the determination of action fects od Hia=ia Breit oP rai Err e109) Coes The severable th flowing expen rain rarai Brae BMAP eres rar (imeeso Brae. ror Byers Pras Era Diagrammatic ropresentation of representative values for actions. ‘Application of coetlent yp y and y, for leading and non- wading variable oetlons at timate and servceabity Tt sate Renfoence poll tye oe) Fipanniysstannteeee fiowsas [SeciniesY Ganoes [pepo [oma reson ~ a | Saas Sean, Loa [re | osteo Pole Bs mend > = fSyrsv ey, % = ee Combinations of actions Sonia aE male “2 vortetons oc gum andres ae | ERATE ‘int tn snes of tt elvan CU) Ieper [Bearer Donn | | | Panacea Bo own “et £10 fr untvourble permanent — eee BeremeeEn content st “mhsigee stamens ul10/29/2012 ULS : Comparison between SS EN1990 and BSICP ones ue vara seta teptr atvoray, vinyen ae ‘Savtaoawcir 165,40" 135, = 19) and BST rales (4 110, > o> 18) ‘ito fr sonia ae Welsh poe nthe ST as Bnet nda) ‘Combination with one variable action exo peta eta ymary gai HEenemnronacrdnnt, Ld ers Ra as Observations from the study Comparison of 8S EN 1890, Cases A, B and C with BSICP 13 The adaption af ambition le A sing he 55 E1950 ecommended oes partly ad combination ator wl produce ose “arb rely to tht tne by BS, when one vr action i “anieree in comsinotan, 0) The 8 aconmendtion of wing ert paral facto (2,2) forthe Parapet son ape aco the variable action hes been shown {ova owe evel of ela han alte SE 190 cases, 5s A does ot produce a conser evel of safety rte complete ange ol Adopting Cae @ would ee aprons amare coastnt level but lowe eve! of snfety en consdaig ane able action ‘na ahigher eve a sft han considering mere than on vale ‘lon thn tht present ounn he UK 8 1210/29/2012 ‘The effect on B on varying & from 0,85 to 0,95 ‘SLS design situations Three separate combinations can be considored (sence these a0 ee peed I Het) se ofcombiion 8 with 0925 wil provides rebcton Paso Seinen? 5405, db cone afeahteonpared [Teac an conan ey no ct ero it err i> pransenson E Gp POs" Eye G14) im oH See oedema danerenenp en Fyr2Oes (e180) J Thema conta mb wn nella npn eos Bou Eva @.188) NA226 Clause A142 ‘Annex At (normative) Application for Buildings ‘rtuetonand dorset seul nd nonstcutelennteg 1> “arsnvtiete] te christ contnton epson 6b Sevan, ieee erage ego conten epson shot 80, Poeun the sae the qn emanencorbeatn separate cnnerson sole geno seve at opeaance stat rated wae cons ch my bee ste ‘AL Field ofppaton 11.2 Combitans of tons [A122 alu: of fotos ‘8.3 Utinate lent ster ‘AL2. Design values of etions in prstent ond transient desgn ‘soso ‘51.4.2Design oles ofetos nthe ecbetel ond semi design assent it tates ‘A. Pat fotos for actions seca? APPRONCH emm> APeRonci 2 meee seercnchs — . f I 1310/29/2012 ‘Table NA.AA.2 (A) ~ Design values of actions (QU) (Set) “Tablo NAAt.2 (8) ~ Design values of actions (STRIGEQ) (Set 8) Table NA.At.2 (C) Dosig values of actions (STRIGEO) (St) Table NAA “eeldental and sami Zea, | Smee ey seem ce oo, ey, Pe a a a ors eee | iete wi] aie |p Peba urmes ing the informative annoxos B, Cand D nat erwin Guidance on Worked examples : ULS combinations of actions invous beam (tof 2) ‘ny ved apres eed Ines Co 0 ‘one 8 prover nose panne eting os mabe the ‘ance sims es. Forts upon te we of Cer Bt ad 0 Anne ace “Sweeney austere Ect aarn btantin eon et sity, — WG) Grog ana A Aus TL n, Ze 410/29/2012 Worked examples : ULS combinations of actions fora continuous beam (2 of 2) {Scherer te ayer 130 WKKeGy — 1eS) mA \ mM 9 AMMA AMAA RI ‘Beery nananto te ener Fane pr bd eal eames AUIUUULULL Scocieeeeees TA e909 ‘Worked examples: ULS combinations of actions or a canopy (23) Worked examples :ULS combinations of actions. fora canopy (of), a — Sintered ra ‘Sincnstaronveves {| UJLL Serre UMMA | | Reiter mya) amenien poem \eetas shese nate altaya ta vultittyjatatts —_oesea Ble + rad emg: conbotin of een rtd ample U8 emt of ton eldontal concrete framed bullaing (1 of 4) ‘eldontalconerato framed bullaing (2! 4) aaa reirerna ee Tie pranrnnpond nd den cba dae = Scsgcanecne- Smee EESEEIEETEET Shy ‘rtanaton a he 13804 vas astne aro z {saa ka CFO gg Gan NSSO1S He 2081 +» 1510/29/2012 Worked examples : ULS combination of action Worked examples :ULS combination of action “residential conerete framed bullng (4 of 4) resident conerete framed bulding (8 of ) (ree [mente (ome SSAC are son Sconce nas «Predominant ton: saw mle is aah dyredominntacionsardcelead — Vole Tas seoQ9- 06%.) ma] | Doreen a nF 33805 Sante? " 135011504" LO! On 1380415 NTH ODF o : “it you dont ke change, you're going to The impact of the change on the Be eae sarge eer, building and construction Gen Eric Shinseld industry in Singapore 5 wy AX Impact of the change... Z ay rs) v > Regulators, Developers, Consultants, Contractors, ‘Suppliers, Testing agencies, > Cost and time required for the industry to understand and properly use/adopt the Eurocodes END * Drastic change in design philosophy on 1, _ (geotechnical works 9 1 Retralning of staff~ knowledge and processes QaA + Computer softwares ‘Opportunities for business locally and. a