Professional Documents
Culture Documents
07 .People v. Valdez
07 .People v. Valdez
ev.Val
dez
Fact
s:
PO2EduardoValdezandhi
sbrot
herEdwinVal
dezwer
eaccusedf
ort
hemur
deroft
heSayson
br
other
.Theinf
ormati
onsfi
ledar
easfol
lows:
"
Cri
minalCaseNo.00-
90718
CONTRARYTOLAW.
Cr
imi
nalCaseNo.00-
90719
CONTRARYTOLAW.4
Cr
imi
nalCaseNo.00-
90720
CONTRARYTOLAW.
"
Theaccusedwasf
oundbyt
heRTCgui
lt
yofal
loft
hechar
ges.Thecasewasappeal
edbef
ore
t
heCour
tofAppeal
sinwhi
chi
taf
fi
rmedt
heconvi
cti
on.Hencet
hisappeal
.
Accused al
leged,among other
s,t
hatt
heSt
atewasnotabl
eto est
abl
ish t
hequal
if
ying
ci
rcumstanceoftreacher
y.
I
ssue:
Whet
herornott
heaccusedi
sgui
lt
yofmur
der
.
Hel
d:
Citi
ngPeopl ev.Di maanot heCour tsai
dthat"Ever
yelementoft heoffensemustbest at
edi n
theinformation.Whatf actsandcircumstancesarenecessarytobei ncl
udedt herei
nmustbe
determined by reference tothe de6niti
ons and essenti
als ofthe speci6ed cri
mes.The
requir
ementofal legi
ngt heelement sofacri
mei ntheinfor
mationistoinformt heaccusedof
thenatur eoftheaccusat i
onagainsthim soast oenablehimtosuitablypreparehisdefense.
The pr esumption isthatt he accused has no i
ndependentknowl edge oft he fact
st hat
constit
utetheof f
ense.