Greenbelt:
New Urbanism
meets Postmodern
Disneyfication
GERARD LICO
[reget teint ty bs
Disny al haath Maerz
Fcareey in oe wun pang a
depend sd wastes
stems te nebatan ge
tolerance for arch
Tesiaty aun valoeiegol —_geighbottiood, living. working, shopping,
(los, om tae, astespaeny -
ie aunt and all other activites of daily Ute &
witinn walking distance of ezch
conforming to the geogrephy
provectionism, self:eon
Exemplifying the wend te cut on
avtomobile dependency, snd prov
hhgusine closer to work to preserve op
pace, Makati's Greenbelt development made
Land Insttwie Aveaed of Excelle
Institute is a US-based international esearch
and educational orpanization that provides
urban compositional sconnate bitty Shee enon
Bt0Wn phenomenally and
cena sine ones Pee
lsc ti. ace an
hoping mall cones
windowees bck vein a
Greenbelt, as 1h fi eos
a ep with verdant wopicer
oe op
ay dent cosmapeian mes
HPC cer hep Paes
have em over im ihc
Greet 2 snd 3a ai
teen Mall (nw tna see ey
OneENeeLro: | 93i the comer of Paseo de Roxas avd
Legospi Sirets. These urban accretions
Decupy what used to be an open parking
fot on Esperanza Scset, As part of the
Ayala Center, along with its sister mall,
Gloriewa, Greentel: 2 and 3 are searniessly
integrated with a2.6 hectare ueban park
teeming with 600 full-grown tees*-a
iewal tropical forest amidst the asphalt
jungle, The desiga thas judiciously
incorporates the urban park with an
extended mall configuration, is attributed
to the collaboraticn of Seattle-based
Callison Architeetsze and loeai eounte
GF and Porters fer an
Recio + Casas for Greenbelt 2
A walk through Greenbelt reveals the
delightful tension and negation between
pseudo-deconstructvs structural architectura!
lements and the organic silhowettes mesh
‘of vegetation, Investing on the idea of a
Promenade, carefully orehesteacedlandseape
stone-paved
elements like fountsins, trellse
and curvitinaarfooipaths, azebos, and street
fueniture conspire 0 transform the street imo
4 destination in itself, notwithstanding the
Suspicious space it provides for the urban
denizens enacting their caié society
pretensions and Starbuck's behavioral cots.
Greenbelt 2 was oviginally pl
transformed the mundane
parking building ini a trajectory of a daring
architectural experiment, a its main function
is disguised dy wo rows of arcaded
Festauramis on the northern and southern
sides of the first floot. The dining spaces in
the northern side extend beyond the areaded
walkway to blend with the tandscaped areas.
providing a sumptuous al fesco dining pace
The second and third floors of tne sieucture
are of course solely devoied to parking
purposes. But who could imagine ehat the
fourth level would be a site fer wwenty-eight
exclusive garden town houses (2.4.2. “The
Residences") for lease? According to Ayala
Land, these domestic abodes are:
an ining cst oltmetomes win nee!
a sna wage tat seems 1 epi om
feonhee Frome mnenionce ath round
fora fendances a Gesroet a eae
meals ey. oe rides We lear fo
re vesenta evel Whon eleva pene
ou ete 3 cenrl garden wound whch the
[onehomes are cso and youth you sre
em graund evel gai You ee wnt whose
See may ange Hom 2 comiotabl 150 8
GREENGELTC. | 25s7scous 217 sua mos, an
ope slosh teatue ceo
tbe nds. The gacare mate you fel onan
‘acai resdeal entove 103k Syn
be saudi oko
fd eae you se net
the oun but cua four elu.
This planning maneuver is the epitome
of maximizing real estate potential through
the simulation of ground-anchored New
Urbanist neighborhoods. immer
estof Greenbelt 2, the corn
Street and Makati Avenue isthe
building designed by GF and Parine
Greenbelt 3 houses retailers. The largest
structure In the triumviate of buildings, i
houses theaters, a food court, shops, and
Festaurants. The building, erescent in fori,
Opens to a landscaped area that includes +
lagoon, waterfalls, and fountains. This palin
{tee-lined area is the principal exterior plaza
that acts as the focal point 10 the
development. AS a focus, however, it docs
oO! overwhelm the whole development or
compete for attention but works with the
‘other clements in a responsive and symbiotic
86 | butawan 14
‘manner. This design intervention that blurs
the boundaries of inside and outside, works
fo create a congenial context for
consumption,
Internally, the ground floor of Greenbeit
3 contains a double-oaded cortidor that is
lined with commercial establishments. The
‘mall itself detours trom the pervasive teal
emporium cliché as orthogonal spaces or
atrium volumes are absent—or rather,
‘eplaceé by sensuous eurviliness
Curved corridors, wall, and ceilings provide
this mall with grace and spaciousness,
ualities which are absent in boxy mall
chains. The upper floor fs open, reminiscent
of arcades of the past. Unlike its historie
Drecedent, however, the Greenbelt version of
an arcade combines soaring walkways, giand
staitcases, elevators, and water elements,
totally enhancing the dramaturgical aspect
of mall theatrics and offering siage-set
architecture designed for uninier-upted
visual pleasure that veils the exchange
between the consumer and the producer.Generous open air coridors act as balconies
where one can View the lagoon, tees, and
founcaine
The architecture of Greenbelt in fis
{otslity €oes not conjure a palpable Filipina
theme but adheres tothe manta of elisate
ponsive tropical architecture and
Sigalicantly disengages its building form
irom. generic aesthetic formula thai welows
to hate~2 monolithic, rectangular, and
sprawling architecture whose facade
Perpetuates nothing more than seductive
images and signs to ceinforce the eultue of
conspicuous consumption. tn order to be
lobaly competitive, Greenbele must surture
‘highly globalized postmodern archectural
-=nography and highly marketable images,
dominated by pastel hues, structural
exhibitionism, and brash collages of surface
leeatments emblazoned with istericized
Contrary to the aestheticizing
perspective of the Greenbelt project as 3
iumph of beautiful, ideal, livable
environments (confirmed by international
“win appa ceing Greene?
accolades) we shall now pole the overriding
socio-politicai issurs snd ideological
{nvale-of urban sptiel
production
Greenbelt isa spevion ofa fecent urban,
ras tle concept of sel
ategy that ports
contsined sora ent x
the mulkpte function uf Hoe surround
1 clearly cefines a new ushan cartography
that boosts ofan interuationally-conceives
master plan, flushing
of Tire World urban enmtitions. I fabricates
an idea urban eavininment a visitor may
participate in luxury, au! ws. certain degree
deny the existence of wlan squalor and
rassive poverty outside is domain,
Mega-projects jwiwetuate highly
asymmetrical urban sleerlopment. Local
aovernmencs seck invests and oft large
site of public lands or i Gill properties for
‘mega projects that are nts wixed-z0nes of
‘upscale consumption au hausing enclaves,
Bur the “mined” riers sn such projects are
formulas based in consinytion of a specific
Imathet sector ~ heigh"wning the spatial
Greeneetts |egn another stratum they tonstrag ie
ible 1291) is spes ation
ec categories and Was
whece public sud private interene ae
{aited. tn a sense this is simon oe
aradigm: a depatiictend
Pen to public access
laity and feedorn of
‘oni forged between
snd the private estate
lovers sigie wi
‘psuedo-pudie” re
bbuetacking the 5
rive conte
ace, in Creenbel is
‘Ayala Land. For
Urban space
Poticat proves.
fest of the city is that it ts arian
Wy aestbeuciaed, and
conceived, fan
culucaly pretentious. Tigether wi aa,
Imicro-ices like Fort Boniacio, Recker
Ceoter and tastwood Cay, Greet tones
2 conselation of sytheic satelite cer ag
eppcsed to te cies which are aad
throug a
bome ute aitlit urd
to develop in-fl
soasequenily generating a patchwork of
“elites within a city” or seltcontrined
“microworlds"
stgnifie of poverty in ts peeiphery and
becomes an exclusive space fr fantavy snd
Frimarily within tagmented developmen
such a Manila, distingsished by ihe senna
of a comprehensive o sion a8 10
holiscaiy, Foucault thou reeringioine
svstem of disciplinary and instiaronn+e mn,
36s, colned the word Aeterovopia to Principle of thee were that they ea
sya aetna OEE 264 Sly where Stand atone, isseriat divorcing
erdemrend teagan Holton becomes a themacives kam ah nae oe ban
mrad ntgt Tis noden con be deci cing Bee mag
come a aad estended fo the urban Greebeh ste
csp te nt MESHES valve staced te eng
Steran een B= they are acance_arhtecuraipteicee oe
srstematicaly segregated trom the en
sigaifies of eulturat
asuinen can be converied inte economic
The patronses of posimodeen seis
orcenseere: | 08evro¢roat sweep ovr Grant Fs wees paing ea
simply governed by the postmodernist desire
for a more meaningful, communicative
aechitecture, rather, by the tin €
bbe up-te-date and employ t
superstars le
ctitcism. The
and its salzbility, clearly
credentials of the architect who fashions
buildings according tothe image-conscious
al validity of buildings
resides ip the
‘and conspicuous consumer behavior of the
eal estate buyer and lessor, In this sense
the choice of Callison Architecture to provide
‘the masterplan for Greenbelt aims to endow
the development area withthe consecration
of “high” archieensral culture and popular
recognition
Posimiodern packaged landscapes are
90 |bulawan 44
l
ariful fragments of wiban development
controlled by the whips of globalization.
They are set-piece diversions that draw a
cloak over the realities of intensifying soca!
polarization,
Informalization of urban settlements which
characterize Manila. As Harvey (1989)
suggests of the standardized application of
postmodern design tenets in urban
fegeneration initiatives, they mimic 3
“carnival mask that divers, entertains,
leaving the social problem: that lie bebind
the mask unseen and uncared for. The
formula smacks of a consteucted fetishism,
in which every aesthetic power of illusion
and image is to mobilize the mask of
intensifying lass, racial, ethnic polarizationgoing underneath.” Ths ftish gains power
fn the form of aestheticism as the answer to
L the sociat probiem.
enforced by surveillance camers
personnel. These micro-cities recapiure the
traditional Filipino plaza complex, 10 create
the ilysion of urban civility and an open
space of ocial communion. In truth shey are
highly puified and canuoiled domains,
fou by the developer are subtly excivdes
These site fabricate an ideal commanity an
illusory ste of public hfe, devoid of poverty
factions, and eccentricities. They imbibe 3
festive atmosphere geared \owards
ccouragingconslcuous consumpon The
presence of a FoueauliiatTegime of
normalization, whereby poteatial disruptions
to the designed effect are pinned down and
evicted, are stiely enforced. As everyday
practice, these forms of control are invisible
ts the rules are embodied in the habites of
the place where genuine conflict are
expunged from ks premises. These become
1 heterotrophic site, assuming 2 pseudo:
publie facade that embodies the utopian
fesice for 8 purified community of social
harmony, wealth, and casslessness.
Investment in urban spectacle lends
urban space {6 manipulation. Residents of
such spaces are offered sequestered settings
with an expensive package of amenities. The
Greenaertc: | 91very names of these communities are
Corefully selected in order to set the
fequired tome of distinction, heritage, and
puthenticty. The net result isa landscape
Fludded with glitay nodes, 2 carefully
packaged micro-lancscane of mixed-use
Govetopment with striking architecture,
Tunuriguslooking materials and fittings
and open spaces planted with expensive
topical vegetation—all in the name of
‘opulence and exclusivity
‘Overall, Groenbelt's mode of urban
schemata can be likened to that of
Disneyworld—conflating reality and
ban scale, This afinily €2
fn the manner in which
parks make explicit the
control that are to be
sed 0
ve them to the middleclass. 1s
ne the public spaces atd
fey restraining attributes (defined
boundaries, restricted access, implicit
codes of behavior and conduct, strict
regimentation of spaces, eficient services)
gre the sources of comfort forthe middle
Clase visitors, allowing them ( fe
nd secure. Similar
k, Greenbelt
ilized to define the mew hea
consumption. O
92 | bulawan 14