Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Food Habits of Boiga Irregularis
Food Habits of Boiga Irregularis
140 cm SVL examined, only four were females. ‘An analysis of all snakes revealed no sig- nificant difference between the sexes in forest habitat (x° = 5.907, df = 3, 0.1 < P = 0.2). However, a significant difference between the sexes in urban habitat was found due to the preponderance of birds, bird eggs, and mammals in the diet of the large male snakes (x! = 17.176, df =4,0.001
176 cm SVL never consumed small lizards when offered. Snakes were analyzed according to whether or not they had prey in their stomach or intestinal tract. Since urban snakes had a choice of a variety of prey, SVL groupings were chosen based on prey utilization patterns observed in urban hab- itat (Fig. 1B). The groups were: (1) snakes with lizards and lizards eggs comprising >50% of the diet (snakes <120 cm SVL); (2) snakes with birds, bird eggs, and mam- mals accounting for > 50% of the diet (> 120 ‘cm SVL); and (3) snakes with >95% of the diet consisting of birds, bird eggs and ‘mammals (>150 cm SVL). When compar- ing stomach and intestinal tracts of these groups in forest habitats where the larger prey items (birds and mammals) were scarce, 112 of 251 snakes (44.6%) <120 cm SVL were without prey, while 48 snakes >120 cm SVL (68.8%) did not have prey. Thirteen of 15 snakes (86.7%) > 150 cm SVL found in forest habitats were empty. In urban habitat, 85 of 171 snakes <120 cm SVL (49.7%) did not have prey, 37 of 74 snakes >120 cm SVL (50.0%) were without prey, and 24 of 49 snakes >150 cm SVL (49.0%) were empty. While there was no significant difference in the percent of snakes without prey in the three different ‘groups in urban habitat (x? = 0.021, df = 2,P > 0.95), differences between the groups in forest habitat were highly significant (2 = 40.197, df= 2, P = 0.001) due to finding significantly more larger snakes without rey. Prey composition of Boge regulars by snout-vent length, Snout-vent lengths were grouped in {intervals of 10 em and the mid-point of each interval i listed. Sample size for each interval is leted in parentheses, A is for forest habitat, B for urban habitat, and C combines snakes from forest, urban, and Einknown habitats,FOOD HABITS OF BOIGA Lizard eggs EI Lizards Mammals 1 Bideogs MI Birds CO Nodata 38 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 195 145 155 105 175, GG G9) 48) Cd) 0) BHO) (6) @) (4) (OM) CD 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 195 145 155 165 175 185 195 (0) (8) (12) 7 22) (12) (5) (6) (1) (8) (10) (@) (2) 2) 35 45 55 65 75 85. 95 105 115 125 195 145 155 165 175 185 195 (1) (22) 28484460} (55) (25) (13}(11) (6) (B) (12) @) Snout-Vent Length 29Discussion Members of the genus Boiga are reported to prey on reptiles, birds, and small mam- mals (Zwinenberg, 1978). The mangrove snake, Boiga dendrophila, has been described as an indiscriminate feeder taking birds, ‘mammals, snakes, lizards, frogs and pos- sibly invertebrates (Campden-Main, 1970; Minton and Dunson, 1978). Boigairregularis consumes a variety of prey, and its diet on Guam is similar to that reported from its native range. In Australia B. irregulars feeds mostly on birds, small mammals, and liz~ ards (Worrell, 1963; Cogger, 1975), and it is commonly found in bird cages (Worrell, 1963; Zwinenberg, 1978). McCoy (1980) ‘mentions the importance of geckos in the diet of B.irregularsin the Solomon Islands. Based largely on the strong correlation between the range expansion of B.irregu- laris and the avian range contraction, as well as experimental evidence on preda- tion pressure by B. irregularis in various habitats on Guam, largued that this species ‘was responsible for the extinction and range reduction of the native and many of the introduced birds on Guam (Savidge, 1987). Relatively few native birds were found in stomach samples, but this finding is not surprising as most bird populations ‘on Guam were close to extinction at the start of this study. However, limited ex- amination of snake stomachs collected prior to 1982 and native birds found dead in the field document that B. irregularis consumes native birds. The abundance of birds or ‘eggs in the diet of urban-collected snakes further demonstrates utilization of avian prey. Small mammals have also declined drastically in fields near forest habitat, but have remained abundant in savanna, a habitat not preferred by B.irregularis (Sav- idge, 1987). Due to the scarcity of avian and mammalian prey in field habitats, B. iregulars is now maintaining its field pop- ulation largely on lizards. Small lizards are common and the reproductive potential of some of the species appears high enough to withstand predation. ‘An attempt was made to analyze indi- vidual variation in prey preference. Most snakes had single prey items. Of those with JULIE A. SAVIDGE multiple prey (86 snakes), 48 had con- sumed multiple prey types, indicating that at least some individuals of B. irregularis are ‘opportunistic in their feeding and will take a diversity of prey types within the range of types consumed by the respective size class. Both nocturnally active (rats, shrews, geckos) and nocturnally quiescent prey (birds, skinks, anoles, all eggs) are con- sumed, and some individuals had both types within their intestinal tract. Hen- derson (1984), in discussing the diets of Hispaniolan colubrid snakes, states that ac- tive prey are taken by sit-and-wait strate- gists, quiescent prey by active foragers, and that one species he studied that consumed both types of prey exhibited both foraging modes. I have observed B. irregularis ac- tively foraging in the field, but it may em- ploy both foraging modes. Additionally, both terrestrial (i.e., poultry and their eggs and many skinks) and arboreal prey were consumed, indicating that B.irregulars, in addition to varying its foraging strategies, will forage on the ground as well as in trees. Seib (1985) found no difference in num- bers of various prey consumed by male and female Coniophanes fisidens. Mushinsky et al, (1982) reported that the largest individ- uals in two species of Nerodia were females and that these females ate a different array ‘of prey than smaller conspecific males, Most large snakes in my sample were males col- lected from urban habitats where a variety of prey is still available, and when all size classes from urban habitats were grouped together, there was a significant difference between prey types consumed by the sexes. ‘These differences are attributed to the larg- er size attained by the male snakes and thus that larger prey can be consumed, rather than to different preferences of the sexes, There was no significant difference in diet between male and female brown tree snakes <140 em SVL. Ithas been noted that larger snakes often take larger prey, and several studies have shown ontogenetic shifts in prey con- sumption (Carpenter, 1952; Fitch, 1965; Godley, 1980; Mushinsky et a., 1982). Seib (1985) in a study of the tropical snake Co-FOOD HABITS OF BOIGA niophanes fssdens observed that although ontogenetic shifts in prey type were not present, small individuals took smaller- sized prey, larger individuals took both large and small-sized prey, and the largest snakes avoided the smallest-sized prey that dominated the diet of the small snakes. Large Boiga in the lab would not take liz- ards even when hungry, and the largest snakes in my sample took only mammals, birds, and bird eggs. Large snakes are rare in forest habitats where avian and mam- ‘malian prey are now either extinct or ex- tremely rare (pers. obs.), and the higher percentage of forest-collected large snakes without prey indicates they are experienc- ing difficulty in finding acceptable food items. The small snakes consume lizards and lizard eggs, and their diet is probably restricted to prey of a mass and diameter that can be physically consumed. It is un- known if snakes <65 cm SVL take small nestling birds or infant mice if encoun- tered. The diet of medium-sized snakes broadens to include birds and mammals in addition to lizards and lizard eggs. These intermediate classes are the most common in the forest and may be largely respon- sible for the ultimate local extinction of the native forest birds because they can subsist on lizards when avian and mammalian prey ‘become rare. Although small and large snakes were relatively stenophagic in prey choice, the overall diet of B. irregularis can be consid- ered generalized. It regularly consumes three vertebrate classes and appears to eat a variety of species within each class. The diet demonstrates how ontogenetic shifts in prey preference may result in the over- exploitation of prey utilized by larger size classes as a result of relatively unrestricted prey availability for smaller size classes. This raises the question of the role of re- source availability to smaller size classes of B. irregularis versus other population reg- ulation mechanisms such as predation, dis- ease, etc., in controlling the population of B. irregularis in its native habitat. In summary, Guam offers an unique op- portunity to study the dynamics of an ex- otic predator in an insular environment The high densities attained by B. irregularis 281 on Guam, its ability to adapt to various environments, and its varied vertebrate diet, have allowed Boiga to severely affect its avian and mammalian prey. Since me- dium-sized snakes are reproductively ac- tive (pers. obs.), one might predict that as long as small lizard populations remain stable, present densities of B.irregularis will also remain stable and that its population size structure will reflect the available prey base in various habitats. Acknowledgments.—I thank T. Fritts and R. Henderson for reviewing an earlier draft of this manuscript and give special thanks to T. Seibert for providing constructive criticism and many helpful ideas through- out the study. Several people associated with the Guam Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources assisted in this study in fone way or another, and I am particularly indebted to Georganne Neubauer for her help in conducting the snake necropsies. Research was supported in part by the Fed- eral Aid in Fish and Wildlife Restoration Program, Project FW-2R and the Endan- gered Species Conservation Program, Proj- ect Eel. Lirexaruns Cr CCamrony-MAms,S, 1970, A field guide tothe snakes ‘of South Vietnam. Smithsonian Inst, Washington, C65 pp, CARPENTER, C.C. 1952. Comparative ecology of the common garter snake (Thamnophis sal), the ribbon snake (Thomnophiss. satus), and Butler's garter snake (Thammophis butler) in mixed popu Tations. Ecol, Monogr. 22:235-258, Cocom, H. G.”1975. Reptiles and amphibians of “Australia. A.H. de A.W. Reed, Sydney. 584 pp. Fire H.S. 1965, An ecological study ofthe gorter snake, Thannophis stalic Univ. Kans. Publ. Mus, Nat Hist 1545-5 Faris, T.H., AND N. J. Scorr,JR_ 1985, The brown, ‘tree snake on Guam: studies ofits ecology, contol, and threats to other islands. Unpubl. report sub: mitted to the US. Fish and Wildlife Service, Re Bion 1, Portland, Oregon. CGobLEy, J 5.1980, Foraging ecology ofthe striped ‘swamp snake, Regina allem, In southern Florida, Ecol. Monogr. 50:411-836, Hevpmtson, R'W. 1984. The diets of Hispaniolan ‘olubrid stakes I, Introduction and prey gene Gecologia 62:234-239, JENKINS, JM. 1983. The native forest birds of Guam "Amer. Ornithol. Union, Onithol. Monogr. No.3, ‘Washington, D.C. 61 pp. McCoy, M- 1980, Reptiles ofthe Solomon Islands ‘Wau Ecology Institute, No. 780 pp.282 [MIvTON, S.A. AND W. A. DUNSON. 1978. Observar tions on the Palawan mangrove snake, Boga de Arophla malticincta (Reptilia, Serpentes, Colubrs de) J. Herpetl.12:107-108 Mustnsey, H.R, J.J. HERRARD, aND D. 5, Vooorice 1982. Ontogeny of water snake feeding ecology Ecology 63:1624-1629, Savibos, "A. 1986. The roe of disease and predation inthe decline of Guam’ avfauna, Unpubl. PhD. Thesis: Univ. Hlinois, Urbana-Champaign JULIE A. SAVIDGE 1987, Extinction ofan island forest avifauna by an introduced snake. Ecology. In pres. ‘Sum, RL. 1985. Euryphagy in a tropical snake, Co- iophanesfsdens, Biotropica 1757-64. Worms, E1963. Reptiles of Australia, Angus & Robertson, Sycney. 207 pp. Zwnsanesxc, A.J. 1978. Diesnacht baumnater Bojga egal Aquat, Terre. Z. 3177-179, ‘Accepted: 27 May 1987,