been discovered elsewhere, for example in Iran, The objections
raised by Hole’ ries have had limited impact, with the exception
OFF. Ranke's extreme views. According othe late, all the evidence
fcocering apparions of the army of the dead vas the fruit of
hlucinaions pure and. simple, and pusbologial rather than
rythico-religous statements But this ratonalisic, reductionist
interpretation seems tobe as baseless as Holler’s.
have mentioned that the documentation collected in Kalicke
Goheimbinde was rouch richer than what had been available to
“Weiser. Nevertheless, Holler ignored 2 number of themes. Firs,
Weiser had compared the ecsusy of Eurasian shamans wo the
unbridled wari frenzies (Ras of the berserk Secondly, se had
also pointed out the presence of feminine divinities atthe head of the
‘Wild’ Hunt and had investigated the relationship between the
Germanic Perehta and the Mediterranean Artemis. t was from the
fist that Weiser presumably traced ber cautiously advanced
hypothesis thatthe mythico-rural complex she was studying actually
had presIndo-European as well as Indo-European roots; fom the
second, her allusions connected with feriliy themes: Behind the
Germanic warrior associations Weiser glimpsed something vaster
and more complex which was not exclusively marial nor exclusively
Germanic.
Hifler decisively minimized the significance of these possible
ramifcations The eesasy of the Germanic wartors was not an
individual phenomenoa, but a controlled release of restraints
obtained through communion withthe dead, “an immense source of
scat and. staal energies.” “As for female divinities and. the
‘connotations that had been attached to feriity, Hafler definitely
considered them to be of marginal importance. For him the core of
“the ecstatic cut of the Germanic religion of the dead” was the
“bond (e-igo), understood as «sacred duy, withthe living dead
and their guide" The hercic and martial myth of the Germanic
famy of the dead was not redvibe to "general concepts in the
posits study of religion, namely, fetty magic and protecve
Imagic.” Holler rejected tempts to link Germanic wareor frenzy
and shamanistic ecstasy, as wells, in general, the superimposition of
“oriental concepts" on Germanic mythology: Wodan™=Odin was not
god of licentiousness {uschnafun), but the god ofthe dead, of
‘warirs of kings and ofthe state."
"The above passages, except for the last wo, are from the
concluding pages of Kulishe Gehimbind dr Germann the last #0
ial it dil
sppear in a polemical reply to a review by F. von der Leyea. A
peculiar” accident had befallen Haller” between these (90
Dublictions: he had licovered, tn exvoms, thanks toa reference by
Meu, the proceeding of Inte-seventeenth-century ial against an
‘id. Livonian werewolf We recall that Weiser, purruing =
"sggestion by Mogk, had already proposed adding werewolves 10 the
evidence connected with male societies. Now, through this document
fhe voice of fllower ofa sccret male soccty had reached Hiller
without passing through the ter of literary. tradition, ‘The
feommentary which accompanied the republication of the tal
records in an appendix revealed an obvious embarrassment: the
ores told by the old werewolf were ful of fabulous elements and
Aifficlt o accept a literal descriptions of ites; moreover, they were
based explicly on the theme of battles fought perodialy against
witches and watlocks over the feriliy ofthe harvests and, final, the
documents acully mentioned the paricipaton in these combats of
female werewolves. Holler atempted to extricate himself by saying
thatthe werewolf was a raggar, and a Blt besides. The Germanic
wartior groups, instead, were strictly male and not concerned with
(questions of ferility ~ to sum up, they were something totally
Siferent.”
Clearly, Hofler’s interpretative somersaults were required to save
the basic framework of his research; its ideological matrix is lear and
confirmed by the casing words in his book: “The specific vocation of
the Nordic race, its creat in bringing states into being, found its
proper fulllment in the male societies [Manned giving them
{he possibility of flourishing in the richest manner possbl. In the
fillnes oftheir power they constitute both a productive clement and
san aggressive force: fighting, educating, and dominating, they
entered the history ofthe world." Such statements certainly did not
have an orginal ring in the Germany of the peri. A. Kecbs had
already written inthe journal Pave und Gaeta Nationaal
‘sche Briefe (1928) thatthe male Bend was the nucleus from which
“al states have their origin.” Hofer, unlike Weiser, found the
inspiration for his research in that current, spified by Krebs and
‘exemplified by the youth movement merging with Niism. But after
Inving given its stamp to the fst phase of Nazism, the bind
crrent ended up being relegated drastically tothe background.
"This, among other factors, explains the violent atack on Hoiler’s
book published in 1936 i the journal Rae. The author, H. Spek,
judged Kutsche Gekeimbinde der Germanen and Mi. Ninck’s Wodan140 / Clue, Myths, andthe Historia! Method
and germanicher Schdvatgaube to be “grave dangers for the
‘contemporary poieo-cultual situation.” ‘The cricism was not
‘only, nor even primarily, based on scholarly considerations: by
‘modeling the Germanic image on that of the Viking warriors (the
‘erserkil) wh had eot themselves oft fom their native sol the tw0
uthors had forgotten that “the Germanic man of the pagan period,
‘specialy on German si, was primarily a peasant and a watir too,
oF course” He differed greatly from primitive demonic horsemen,
from crazed members of secret societies, from ecstatic. ‘The
tistncive tat in the soul ofthe Nordic race and of the original
Indo-Germani religion, Spehr concluded, was moderation, cahea,
combined with smphryne, not ebsass, the sacred ongy that
characterizes the aca soul of Asia Minor." Evidently inthe eyes of
the Rase reviewer, the exaltation of the martial ferocity of the
‘Germanic male societies conjured up the memory of the SA, which
tad been purged in blood bath two years eater. Holler was lightly
fut of sep with the times in regard wo that solidly rural image,
Custodian of trdilonal vitwes, that the Nazi regime wanted 10
project forse at that particular moment.
Tet us rerum to Myther et dicur des Gemains. Dumézil used
Hiller’ book in is own work without expressing the slightest critical
detachment from i. But Duméz's juxtaposition of beserkc and the
SSA was already implicit in Kultsche Cehimbinde der Geranen,
where the berserk were explained in terms of the SA, and vice
‘essa Ie’the cave of «vious cree more than s hermeneutic one.
‘There remains Block's review. Should we interpret it asthe fruit
of a casual misunderstanding, of a superficial reading? This
‘suggestion, quite improbable in isl is contradicted by the fac hat
Bloch was well acquainted with one of the books used by Dumézi,
Hitler's Kultiche Gekeimbinde der Germanen Bloch wrote favorably
about tin a 1937 fsue of the Reme historique: “The erudition i
{stonishing: the psychological refinement, the sense of life, no les.
Ss. Rarely has anyone penetrated further through that substratum of |
Superimposed popular beliefs from which Europe has for so long
‘ourshed itself, oe analyzed better, ina mythology considered tobe
25 one, such a8 that of the ancient Germans, the coexistence of
fature deities and warsior gods.” Bloch’s favorable opinions (ll
Somewhat debatable except for the eibute to Heller's erudition)
foutweghed by far his crtcsm of dhe laters refusal (probably
preconceived) to tke ito account research on the superimposition
Df Christianity over the anclent myths. Equally downplayed ~ actully
Germanic Mythology and Nasiom / 141
relegated t0 2 foomote - is Bloch’s obseration apropos the
Ierpretation of a passage in the edict of Rothari condemning
Alisgises contrived “inorder to steal” (atrcnandi anime) In these
teavesis Heller had, as usual, presied the waces of ancient cls,
liching this comment from Block: “Without being exceedingly
prostic, I believe, one may deplore the scom in which some
"mythologst hold the simplest explanations." Curiously, Bloch did
not cary this eric, undermining the very foundations of Hofer’
thesis, tts logical conclusion, Stranger stl isthe fact that he did
‘not make something of the ideological implications so patent in such
‘book as Kuiche Govimbinde der Germanen, especialy since he was
discussing it in a review dominated by his aie, his “anguish,” over
the tional ad it orn in German cholri ring
se yeas.
Bloch’simellectual and political biography inthe period preceding
the war is practically unexplored. Even his correspondence. with
Lucien Febwre remains unpublished. ‘To discover some of the
reasons for Bloch’ favorable response tothe books by Dumézl and
‘Holler, we shall have to make an indirect approach
In. 1936 Elie Haléry presented a paper tothe Société Francaise de
Philosophie ended "L'ere des trannies,” which was later published
in the society's Bullen, together with some leters of commentary,
‘one of which was by Marest Maus. Maun uly approved ofthe inks
‘which Haley had suggested between Bolsheviam on one side, and
Fascism and Nazism on the other. He noted the importance of
Sorel’s writings, 10 which Lenin, Mussolini, and, indirectly, Hier
hrough Mussolini) were” indebted. The Bolshevik party, he
continued, remains 2 secret society wih its own armed body (the
KGB), ensconced in the hear of Rosia, just as the Fascist and
Hierian parties, which have neither arllery ao let, but possess =
police apparatus, inhabit Italy and Germany. And Mauss added:
“Here I easily recognize events which often occurred in Greece, and
hich Arisoile deseibes well but which are characteristic of ancient
Societies in general and, who knows, perhaps ofthe ene worl. 1
am refering to the ‘Society of Men, wit its confaternites that are
public and secret at che same tim. In this male society iis che young
‘who act.” Mase concluded that this might be a necessary, but
Socilogcally backward, form of activity. Te satsfies the eraving “Tor
secrecy, fr influence, for action, for youth and often, for tradition,
‘These are new beginning, identical sequences."142 / Cle, Myths, andthe Hiorical Method
‘Nether Dumé no, probably, een Bloch could have oresooked
this eter, reprinted in 1938 when "L'ere des grannies” appeared in
book for immediatly after Hay’ death, In Myhe et dir des
Gerais ich open snl it depict on Mas
crposton of Nea paratary organizations wih ancien you
tjtey" was revved and eaied farther, but ins wally diferent
Spirit Realingbetneen the ines of Dumeris detached acount one
The
shamanistic characterises which I had recognized inthe bnandanth
‘now appear tobe shared by other figures in European folklore: Slavic
and ‘Balic werewolves, Hungarian lr, Dalmatian Ari,
Corsican masse, and s0 forth All these personages claimed to be
able to travel periodically (sprit or in animal form) tothe word of
the dead. ‘Their destiny war indicated by special charactratis
having bcen born with ther teeth (lt), with te cal (enandandh :148 / Clues Myths, andthe Historical Method
eroili, werewolves), or during the ewele days between Christmas
and Epiphany (werewolves)
Let us retum to the wolf-man, We lear from Fread’s published
account thatthe patient was a Rusia, that he had been born with
the eal, that he had been bon on Christmas da.? There is an
‘obvious cultural homogeneity between these facts and the inintle
‘dream focusing on the sppearance ofthe wolves. A series of casual
cincdences is really quite improbable. ‘The intermediary berween
the sphere of folkloric belies connected with werewoles and
Freud's future patient, who belonged, as I have sid, t0 an
‘upper-middle-class family, undoubteily must have been the nurse,
the nani, described asa “pious and Supersttious” woman.® The
child was deeply atached tothe old nurse Gt was she, afer ll, who
tomforted him after his anguished dream about the wolves). [twas
from her that he would have learned what extraordinary (sot
necessily negative) powers were conferred by the fact that he had
been born wih the cal. And it was she who would have told him his
first fairy tales, before the English governess read to him Grimms in
‘Russian translation, Even the fable of the tailor and dhe wolves,