Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN ORDER FOR THE POLICE TO GET AWAY WITH POLICE MISCONDUCT COMBINED WITH
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT YOU NEED THE HELP OF A BAD PUBLIC DEFENDER USING LEGAL
MALPRACTICE TACTICS WORSE THAN A BLACK MAN WITH A KKK ATTORNEY IN THE SIXTIES
fill free to follow the complete case on our face book at repealingcivilrights/go funding
CASE HISTORY
THE ARRESTING K9 OFFICER DID NOT WRITE A REPORT WHILE THE LEAD OFFICER WROTE A
REPORT SO FABRICATED IT DID NOT MATCH THE 911 CD OR PHONE EVENT REPORT I WAS
CHARGED FOR A ALLEGED ASSAULT WITH A DEADLY WEAPON AND FELONY ASSAULT
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DROPPED THE DEADLY WEAPON BEFORE THE 1ST COURT
DATE MOST LIKELY BECAUSE THE WEAPON WAS NOT HEARD ON THE 911 CD AND DID NOT
MATCH THE FABRICATED POLICE REPORT
THE PUBLIC DEFENDER REFUSED TO ASK THE COURT FOR A BAIL REDUCTION THEN GAVE ME
A COPY OF A MANIPULATED POLICE REPORTS SUGGESTED A BAD PLEA DEAL RENEGED ON
THE PLEA DURING SENTENCING AND FAILED TO OBJECT TO THE COURTS EXCESSIVE SENTENCE
THEN REFUSED TO FILE A STAY ON PROBATION WHEN THE APPEAL WAS GRANTED THAT I
WON
I FILED A FEDERAL CIVIL LAW SUET I WAS GRANTED A ORDER TO PROCEED AGAINST THE
OFFICERS FOR UNLAWFUL ARREST I TRY TO INCLUDE THE PUBLIC DEFENDER WHICH WAS
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITHOUT MEANING I HAD A CASE AGAINST THE PUBLIC
DEFENDER HAD I SITED THE RIGHT FEDERAL CLAWS FOR INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF
COUNSEL NEVERTHELESS AS LONG AS THE WARRANT IS PENDING THE STATUE OF
LIMITATION SHOULD CONTINUES TO RUN GIVING ME A CHANCE TO AMEND
2, TAKING NO WITNESS STATEMENTS REFUSING TO ASK THE COURT FOR A BAIL REDUCTION
A APPEALABLE OFFENSE IF THE COURT REFUSED
3, SUGGESTING A BAD PLEA DEAL WITHOUT REVIEWING ALL DISCOVERY RENEGING ON THE
PLEA DEAL DURING SENTENCING
5, REFUSING TO FILE A STAY ON PROBATION HEARING ONCE APPEAL WAS GRANTED THAT
WOULD CORRECT COURT ERRORS
6, AND ISSUING MANIPULATED COPIES OF THE POLICE REPORT FROM THE DISTRICT
ATTORNEY
THIS TWO FACED PUBLIC DEFENDER DID NOT DO ONE THING IN MY CASE
NOR DID SHE INTEND TO DO ONE THING WHILE VIOLATING SEVERAL
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS DISPLAYING PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE
THE RESPONSIBLY TO FIX THESE ERRORS OF THE PRIOR PUBLIC DEFENDER FALL CLEARLY ON
THE LEAD SUPERVISOR OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE BECAUSE SABRINA DENISE
ASHJIAN NO LONGER WORKS THERE AS WELL AS THE HEAD OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE
MS DIAZ
ALTHO THEY DID NOT CAUSE THE MALPRACTICE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE
PUBLIC FALL ON THEM ONCE PROPERLY NOTIFIED OF ANY LEGAL MALPRACTICE STILL ACTIVE
THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND MOTIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED AND ATTACHED SO
THAT THE ERRORS CAN BE FIX GOD SPEED BEFORE THE POLICE KILL ME FOR TRUMPED
UP CHARGES THAT THE WINNING APPEALS STATED SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN IMPOSED
1 EX PARTE MOTION TO CLEAR THE RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT OF THE
WARRANT THAT APPEALS STATED SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN IMPOSED
5 RECALL WARRANT
THE OFFICERS WOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED UNDER Title 18, United States
Code Section 241 & 242 VIOLATIONS OF CONSPIRACY TO FABRICATE A POLICE
REPORT
7 WHAT TIME DID THE 911 PHONE EVENT REPORT TIME START
9 WERE WAS THE OFFICER THAT WROTE THE REPORT LISTED IN THE PHONE
EVENT BEFORE THE ARREST AND AFTER THE ARREST
1ST INJUNCTION KEEP OLD CASES WITH WARRANTS IN OFFICE AND STOP
RETURNING THEM IN 1 WEEK
2ND DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND PUBLIC DEFENDER SHOULD HAVE THE SAME
POLICE REPORTS
4TH STOP THE PUBLIC DEFENDER FROM GOING TO COURT WITHOUT THE
POLICE REPORT IN THE FILE
STATING WHEN ANY CASES WAS A WARRANT PENDING OLD OR NEW THE
PUBLIC DEFENDER NEED TO KEEP THE RECORDS CLOSE AT HAND SO THAT
THEY WOULDN'T VIOLET DEFENDANTS RIGHT THROUGH INEFFECTIVE
ASSISTANCE OF COUNSELING
SECOND INJUNCTION
I HAD 3 SETS OF POLICE REPORTS THAT ALL CAME BACK DIFFERENT SEE ATTACHED REPORTS
THEY STARTED GETTING SMART WOULD NOT REPLY TO MY CALLS OR EMAILS AND SEEM TO
BE PROVOKING ME INTO A ANGRY OUT BURST WHILE CALLING THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
ABOUT THE WARRANT
THEN THEY TRIED TO GIVE ME LEGAL ADVICE TELLING ME TO PUT MYSELF ON COURT
CALENDAR FOR THE WARRANT THE PUBLIC DEFENDER CREATED KNOWING THE JUDGE
WOULD LOCK ME UP AND THE NEW PUBLIC DEFENDER WOULDN'T HAVE THE FILE
JUST LIKE THEY DID IN 2 CASES IN THE PAST IT IS STARTING TO BECOME COMMON PRACTICE
FOR THE PUBLIC DEFENDER TO GO TO COURT WITHOUT THE POLICE REPORT IN THE FILE
NOW IT SEEMS THEY DON'T HAVE THE SAME POLICE REPORT THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
HAVE I CAN GIVE YOU CASE NUMBER AS WELL AS COURT REPORTS TRANSCRIPTS
NEVERTHELESS PLEASE FIX YOU ERRORS AND STOP THIS RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT