Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The picture shows the lack of self-care that they can provide to themselves. It shows the emotion
that man is feeling, probably sadness and hopelessness. Furthermore, you can see that he is
sitting on the pavement and has no belongings. I believe it strongly appeals to emotion when the
audience thinks about how devastating it is for a person to lose everything. Specially because he
is alone. Perhaps, not having material thing or a roof over his head is unimaginably
because most people fail to consider substance abuse a mental disease. I believe this chart is
included visuals that appealed to their logic. Using empirical information to back up my
argument.
The purpose of this picture was to further explain the Housing First
Phoenix because it is not my main purpose to educate about it. However, I deemed it important
to explain that there are things that can be done to help the situation. I stress that there need to be
Analysis of Components
For project one I had to develop a multimodal research paper. My topic is homelessness
in Downtown Phoenix. Initially I thought that my intended audience should be someone in the
City Council that could read it and develop ideas to deal with the problem. While I was writing
the paper, however, I realized that my intended audience should be broader. Anyone in the area,
or in any area that struggles with the same problem could educate themselves about the issue.
Most of my statistics and solutions are specific to Downtown Phoenix, but it doesn't mean it is
not applicable in other cities or states. For this reason, I added a map that locates Downtown
Phoenix, because my paper doesn't target residents of the area as the only audience. I utilized
terms that are understandable for anyone who would search for information on the topic.
Meaning, that high school and college students, residents and elected officials, could easily
I decided that integrating it to a website could make it more appealing for a variety of
people. Looking at an APA formatted research paper makes the content less appealing for the
general population. Besides adding the content to a website, I added a great variety of visuals to
I located the pictures in relation of the paragraph information. I located the relevant
picture to each paragraph right before. It was with the purpose of building into the content and
adding some background about what was expected on the text. When opening the website, the
first picture of a homeless man sitting on the street. I chose this picture because it appealed to
emotions (pathos). If I would’ve started with statistics, the reader wouldn’t relate to the problem
on an emotional level. The second reason for which I located this picture in the beginning is
4
because it catches the audience attention. There is a lot that can be said through that one picture.
Looking at the terrible conditions in which he is found and the sadness in his face.
To use logos, I added graphs. The best way to back up my information was to add
information that was empirical. That could be proven by hard facts. I believe that adding graphs
helps with the credibility of my paper. It proves that it is not based on off a theory or emotional
value. There is a chart that signal the process of homelessness that is discussed on my paper. I
put it around the mid part of my paper because that is when I truly start building into my
argument. Positioning it early would draw attention away from the background information I
provided. If it was positioned at the end, its intended purpose, which is facilitation understanding
Overall, what I learned while developing this paper, I will use throughout my school and
professional career. I feel like it is important to be able to evaluate your audience successfully
Analysis of Feedback
feedback I received on my paper helped me build a stronger claim and a more appealing project
overall. I received feedback from my peers, my instructor and the writing center. The comments
focused on the writing structure, relevance of my information and the appealing elements.
The first feedback I received was form one of my peers. Her comments were extensive
and focused on content of the paper. From her comments I looked back to my sources and
decided to cut out information that was too broad. Such as, statistics referring to the US or
another country. She mentioned some mistakes with spelling and conventions. I had considered
those as I hadn’t thoroughly revised my draft. I didn’t agree when she mentioned that I shouldn’t
include substance abuse, because she considered it out of the mental illness umbrella. From this
concept, I realized that other people could have similar ideas. Therefore, I chose to address that
substance abuse is a mental illness, as describes on the DSM 5. The official manual for mental
illness diagnosis.
campus. My main concern was that I didn’t like the continuity of my paper. I felt like the
paragraph didn’t connect properly. My writing mentor helped me organize my ideas in a way
that made my paper fluent. Furthermore, she helped me with some troubles I had in regards of
APA citations. Two of mu sources were written by the same author on the same yea and month. I
resolved it by adding the day it was published. It was extremely helpful to meet with her because
The last feedback I received was from my instructor. He focused on bigger ideas about
my paper. Such as how to address a counterargument and validating and selecting my sources. I
6
read through my draft again and realized that I thought I had addressed a counterargument, but it
was too brief for the audience to acknowledge it. I built more upon opposing views on
homelessness. I also accredited those views, because I know that homelessness can’t be the
caused by one specific issue. My instructor told me to build more upon why my sources were
relevant and to explain my claims thoroughly. I believe I explained all he material I addressed
clearly. Therefore, recognizing the importance for each source and quote.
All the feedback I received from different sources helped me build a stronger paper. I
didn’t consult about the pictures I was using to support my paper. I felt confident about my
choice of pictures and charts. I was sure they built into my paper and the purpose. However,
about conventions and content, I was able to modify my paper to use the comments I had
received.