The document summarizes four arbitration cases from 1929 between French claimants and Mexico regarding damages caused by revolutionary forces in Mexico. In each case, the arbitration commission, consisting of the Presiding Commissioner and the French Commissioner, found that the looting and damages caused by Zapatist and Constitutional forces were covered under Article III of the claims convention between France and Mexico. The text of the actual decisions was omitted.
The document summarizes four arbitration cases from 1929 between French claimants and Mexico regarding damages caused by revolutionary forces in Mexico. In each case, the arbitration commission, consisting of the Presiding Commissioner and the French Commissioner, found that the looting and damages caused by Zapatist and Constitutional forces were covered under Article III of the claims convention between France and Mexico. The text of the actual decisions was omitted.
The document summarizes four arbitration cases from 1929 between French claimants and Mexico regarding damages caused by revolutionary forces in Mexico. In each case, the arbitration commission, consisting of the Presiding Commissioner and the French Commissioner, found that the looting and damages caused by Zapatist and Constitutional forces were covered under Article III of the claims convention between France and Mexico. The text of the actual decisions was omitted.
(Decision No. 40 of June 13, 1929, by Presiding Commissioner and French Commissioner only.)
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTS OF FORCES. Looting of shop by Zapatist forces held
covered by Article III of the Convention. The possibility for claimant to evacuate part of his stock to Mexico before the damage occurred is taken into account in assessing damages. (Text of decision omitted.)
DR. PIERRE PIETRI (FRANCE) v. UNITED MEXICAN STATES
(Decision No. 41 of June 13, 1929, by Presiding Commissioner and French Commissioner only.)
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTS OF FORCES. Looting by Zapatist forces held covered
by Article III of the Convention. (Text of decision omitted.)
BARTOLOMÉ TURIN (FRANCE) v. UNITED MEXICAN STATES '
(Decision No. 42 of June 13, 1929, by Presiding Commissioner and French Commissioner only.)
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTS OF FORCES. Looting of wool weaving-mill by
Zapatist forces, forced loans, destruction of workshops, residence and garden, and forcing claimant to operate the mill for them using raw materials found in the mill held covered by Article III of the Convention. (Text of decision omitted.)
ESTATE OF MARIE BEAURANG (FRANCE) v. UNITED MEXICAN
STATES (Decision No. 43 of June 13, 1929, by Presiding Commissioner and French Commissioner only.)
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACTS OF FORCES. Looting of two haciendas by Constitu-
tionalist forces and, later, by troops of the "Ejército Libertador"ÂeW covered by Article III of the Convention. 1 Cf. decision No 12.