Family Jewels

,· .
""I~'lj:.t~.: .• ~l ~
'j,u::;;'~'-:;;~li-',~-~~:'J:?Ui~~G',AND-RF.C?RDSHEET "==--
·;(l
'-'.I
"1, ,I"'J,H'U
<D'. __ .., -'i::;L
GilLY c
f."J COHH 'IlIAL ~
.... I
J----.-., , '''-- , .,," .- - """"-.- - --.. " ._-"'". _ - - --. "'-' - - . - -,.- -. "..- - - - - - - - - - - . - . -
FROM: Ho',' a r d J. 0 s bo rn ( EXTENSION NO.
( Di rec tor 0 f SC cur it} > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -...- - -
1.----.---.-
1 ...... 1.. , ._.~I----+---I. _...........,I-D-... T-E_ _ 1_6_'f\-1a-Y
-l-9-7-3---_ _---I
TO: (Officer de,ignolion, room nurr-ber, or><! DATE
\ building) . __ . ".._ _,..,.-_ _--j OFFICER'S COMMENTS {Number each comment to .how from whom
INITIALS 10 whom. Draw a line aero" column ofler 'each commenl.}
\ .. ._ _._ ~EalvED FORWARDED
1. Executive secretary,-1---~~---t---~---~--~F1t~~~·~~·
:tH~·~~f~S~~t/~==~-~
CIA Management .fr.u U;~~I - -
1_ _ C"'-'QIDrnit.t.e_e...., , -l --+._ .._. '-'" - ....,~-----;
2.
i J - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - . - . ------ -----.--- . - . - . - ...._ ..-

~ 3.
II
J
J...--------------l-----;---;-----..........,
-4.
J (b)(1)
'J--------------t-----j----j-----j
j
(b)(3)
5.
; (b)(5)
(b)(6)
6.
Co
7. APPROVED FOR RELEASE

DATE: JUN 2007
8,
9. "
10.
•
11.
0000:1
12.
"
13.
u.
'\ 15. L VL\.- I'

... laV T
D U~(lASSIHED
,"
16 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary,

CIA Management Committee
SUBJECT "Family Jel'ie1s"
1. The purpose of this memorandum is to

forl'iard for your personal review summaries of activities
conducted either by or under the sponsorship of the
Office of Security in the past which in my opinion con-
flict with the provisions of the National Security Act
of 1947.
2. These activities cover the period from
March 1959 to date and represent as accurate a record
as is available in our files. Those activities which
took place prior to the date of my appointment as
Director of Security on 1 July 1964 have been developed
to a certain extent through the recollection of the
senior people in this Office who were involved or who
had knowledge of the activities at the time they
occurred. '
3. I have gone back to March 1959 because I
believe that the activities occurring since that time
still have a viable "flap potential" in that many of the
people involved, both Agency and non-Agency are still
alive and through their knowledge of the activity repre-
'sent a possible potential threat or embarrassment to the
Agency. I would be glad to provide clarification or an
explanation of any of these activities if desired. You
have my assurance that unless otherwise stated each of
these activities was approved by higher authority--the
00002
-I
L.- _
Director of Central Intelligence, the Deputy Director
of Central Intelligence, the Executive Director-
Comptroller, or the Deputy Director for Support.
Attachments
00003
--_ .. _-
.
'.
00004
Attachment A
"FAJ'.HLY JEWELS"
1.
2. Johnny Roselli -- The use of a member of the

Mafia in an attempt to assassinate Fidel Castro.
3. Project MOCKINGBIRD -- During the period from 12
March 1963 to 15 June 1963, this Office
installed telephone taps on two Washington-
based newsmen who were suspected of disclosing
classified information obtained from a variety
of governmental and congressional sources.
4. Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko -- A KGB defector who from
the pe~idd 13 August 1965 to 27 October 1967
was confined in a specially constructed "jail"
atl l He was literally confined in a
cell oellIlIU oars wi th nothing but a cot in it
for this period.
5. Various Surveillance and Support Activities --
These are briefly summarized and range from
the surveillance of newsmen to the provision
of specialized support of local police officials
in the Metropolitan area. I believe that each
one is self-explanatory and, therefore, no further
comment is needed here.
6. Equipment Support to Local Police -- Attached is a
list provided me by the Director of Logistics
(he will simply report these items in his
report) which we have provided local police in
the Metropolitan D. C. area over the past four
or five years on indefinite loan. During the
period when the Agency's installations in this
area appeared to be a target of dissident elements
_ _ _ _·~O..!oLOO 05
_ _I
. . . . . . ~l '.
a conscious decision was made by the Agency to

utilize the services of local police to repel
invaders in case of riot or dissension as
opposed to utilization of our GSA guards, who
are not trained in this type of activity. This
equipment has been issued over the years to
local police, principally Fairfax and Arlington
County Police Departments. I do not believe
that this is totally illegal under the provisions
of the National Security Act of 1947, but I am in-
cluding it since I am sure that it would be con-
sidered as such in light of the recent congressional
fuss over our police training activities.
7. Audio Countermeasures Support to the United States
Secret Service
8. Test of Specialized Equipment in Miami Immediately
Prior to the Political Convention There
00006
2
$
"'
a .•: / - .
"
,-.-
...
00007
SEC! T
EV£~ .?~t~
00008
I
00009
~ ... .n.·.·.::.w.·.·"..'..'••r.m.nr.rr.71.·_ ...:11·.'_ _-".....·.,- _•.•.
~~~.I:n"'I p-' .5.'
\
...
S_ RET
EVES ' ~~~LY
0001,0
3
000:1:1
( .' J.
SUBJECT: Johnny Roselli
In August 1960, Mr. Richard M. Bissell

1.
approached Colonel Sheffield Edwards to determine if
the Office of Security had assets that may assist in a
sensitive mission requiring gangster-type action. The
mission target was Fidel Castro.
2. Because of its extreme sensitivity, only a
small group was made privy to the project. The DCI was
briefed and gave his approval. Colonel J. C. King,
Chief, WH Division, was briefed, but all details were
deliberately concealed from any of the JMWAVE officials.
Certain TSD and Communications personnel participated
in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of
the purpose of the mission.
3. Robert A. Maheu, a cleared source of the
Office of Security, .was contacted, briefed generally on
the project, and requested to ascertain if he could
develop an entree into the gangster elements as the first
step toward accomplishing the desired goal.
4. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one Johnny
Roselli on several.oc~isions while visiting Las Vegas.
He only knew him casually through clients, but was given
to understand that he was a high-ranking member of the
"syndicate" and controlled all of the ice-making machines
on the Strip. Maheu reasoned that, if Roselli was in
fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly had connections
leading into the Cuban gambling interests. , .
S. Maheu was asked to approach Roselli, who knew
Maheu as a personal relati6ns executive handling domestic
and foreign accounts, and tell him that he had recently
been retained by a client who represented several inter-
national business firms which were suffering heavy financial
losses in Cuba as a result of Castro's action. They were
convinced that Castro's removal was the answer to their
l
problem and were willing to pay a price of $150,000
for its successful accomplishment. It was to be made
clear to Roselli that the United States Government was
not, and should not, become aware of this operation.
6. The pitch was made to Roselli on 14
September 1960 at the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City.
~Ir. James O'Connell, Office of Security, was present
during this meeting and was identified to Roselli as an
employee of Maheu. O'Connell actively served as Roselli's
contact until May 1962 at which time he phased out due
to an overieas assignment. His initial reaction was to
avoid getting involved, but through Maheu's persuasion,
he agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who
knew the "Cuban crowd." Roselli made it clear he did
not want any money for his part and believed Sam would
feel the same way. Neither of these individuals were
ever paid out of Agency funds.
7. During the week of 25 September, Maheu was
introduced to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau
Hotel, Miami Beach. It was several weeks after his
meeting with Sam and Joe,. who was identified to him as
a courier operating between Havana and Miami, that he
saw photographs of both of these individuals in the
Sunday supplemental "Parade." They were identified as
Momo Salvator~,Giancani and Santos Trafficant, respectively.
Both were on the list of the Attorney General's ten most-
wanted men. The former was described as the Chicago
chieftain of the Cosa Nostra and successor to Al Capone,
and the latter, the Cosa Nostra boss of Cuban operations.
Maheu called this office immediately upon ascertaining
this information.
8. In discussing the possible methods of
accomplishing this mission, Sam suggested that they not
resort to firearms but, if he could be furnished some
type of potent pill, that could be placed in Castro's food
or drink, it would be a much more effective operation.
Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the
person of Juan Orta, a Cuban official who had been receiving
kick-back payments from the gambling interests, who still had
access to Castro, and was in a financial bind.
OOO~l3
2
SEGI.,: T
Eyr . fiNLY
9. TSD was requested to produce six pills of
high lethal content.
10. Joe delivered the pills to Orta. After
several weeks of reported attempts, Orta' apparently got
cold feet and asked out of the assignment. He suggested
another candidate who made several attempts without
success.
11. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona,
one of the principal officers in the Cuban Exile Junta, had
become disaffected with the apparent ineffectual progress
of the Junta and was willing to handle the mission through
his own resources.
12. He asked, asa prerequisite to the deal, that
he be given $10,000 for organizational expenses and requested
$1,000 worth of communications equipment.
13. Dr. Verona's potential was never fully
exploited, as the project was canceled shortly after the
Bay of Pigs episode. Verona was advised that the offer
was withdrawn, and the pills were retrieved.
14. Of significant interest was an incident
which involved a request levied by Sam upon Maheu .
.,'
At the height of the project negotiations,
Sam expressed concern about his girlfriend,
Phyllis McGuire, who he learned was getting
much attention from Dan Rowan while both were
booked at a Las Vegas night club. Sam asked
Maheu 'to put a bug in Rowan's room to deter-
mine the extent of his intimacy with Miss
McGuire. The technician involved in the assign-
ment was discovered in the process, arrested,
and taken to the Sheriff's office for questioning.
He called Maheu and informed him that he had
been detained by the police. This call was made
in the presence of the Sheriff's personnel.,
Subsequently, the Department of Justice
announced its intention to prosecute Maheu along
000:14
with the technician. On 7 February 1962,
the Director of Security briefed the Attorney
General, Robert Kennedy, on the circumstances
leading up to Maheu's involvement in the
wiretap. At our request, prosecution was
dropped.
15. In May 1962, Mr. William Harvey took over

as Case Officer, and it is not known by this office
whether Roselli was used operationally from that point on.
16. It was subsequently learned from the FBI

that Roselli had been convicted on six counts involving
illegal entry into the United States. Our records do not
reflect the date of conviction, but it is believed to
have been sometime during November 1967.
17. On 2 December 1968, Roselli, along with

four other individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to
cheat members of the Friars Club of $400,000 in a rigged
gin rummy game.
18. Mr. Harvey reported to the Office of Security

of his contacts with Roselli during November and December
1967 and January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny
would not seek out the Agency for assistance in the deporta~
tion proceedings unless he actually faced deportation.
Roselli expressed confidence that he would win an appeal.
19. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James

O'Connell, Roselli's first Case Officer, to advise that
Maheu's attorney, Ed Morgan, had received a call from a
Thomas Waddin, Roselli's lawyer, who stated that all
avenues of appeal had been exhausted, and his client now
faces deportation. Waddin indicated 'that, if someone did
not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make a complete
expose of his activities with the Agency.
20. On 18 November 1970, Mr. Helms was briefed

on the latest development in this case, and it was decided
that the Agency would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu
was so advised of the Agency's position, and he was in
4 00015
SEC, T
f l~S DNLY
, • ' I ~
complete agreement with our stand. He further advised

that he was not concerned about any publicity as it
affected him personally should Roselli decide to tell
all.
21. Subsequently, Roselli or someone on his
behalf furnished Jack Anderson details of the operation.
Attached are two Anderson columns dealing with this
matter.
22. The last known residence of Roselli was the
Federal Penitentiary in Seattle, Washington.
Attachments
00016
J••'Ill,*.?I'SIIl.•.••·IIIIIIlIlIiI·1".',,17.PIt!IISI'.P."• • • •· IIItt
ton ._·IIn .. s
• • •- • . . ., - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
.. , .. )t~r"
,
\
r
[
00017·
"
,---- .. - . -r
cD I
BJ'Y' ] {!(" k~ I J
o":i1o.t-'rJOll 'or
l
i;efore
.
(I'e "'o'lev
" I •• \...
im·]d·
~ ,"
iate a;a:~st President•
,o~. ~ 1:(l"lp~ete w;I;1 :;ecn:t ;'Y~~:; at
! ers ;;lDded on the island. Their Df"dy. :g~!tterir:g :'Iii.1mi Beach hot~l.;·
! Locked in the darkest r:. ~ arrival was expec(ed to touch: To set up t:'e C.15tro ;l", \, ;i. I and :)1 i d n i g i:l t Pow?:-ooat.
: cesses of the ~enlr31 Intell:.: oif a general uprising, whicb i nation, the CIA ep.listed },\ ~-. dashes to ;{'cr~t land:n.;; 3pots .
!;eoce _-\gency ~.~ the story of the Ccrnm'Jnist militia would; ert l',rah~u, a fOf:ner : ;1 on L";e C~";]a:) {:oast. Or;~e, Ro-
I 0\
1
: six ?3sass~n3l;on attem;)LS' '" Vi> 11Jd 11'0 e t"nuh'~ ~ut"n": agent '\'l~th shadowy contac, !'~!!i's Joat ··~-as shot out fro:;! -
':1~ainst Cl.:ba"s ::'idel C?stf'O. La - • . r J I,. 1- .\1.::J. 'r'lho h3d handled uther unci- \ und~r him.
J L
I ,. For 10 year:>, only a few key do',vn without the charismatic: cover il5signi:1~nts for the Cj \ For the fJnt t,y, the CIA~;:
I people have Anown i:'e terri- Castro to lead them. out of his Washington pub!i< c,ln1ished Ro!el1i -;:it~ s-c,,-::i.1l' ~
I ~le sec:-et. They have sworn After the iirst attempt relations oiIice; He ~ater' ',lison capsule~ to slip' intO:: ~
: never to talk. Yet. we have- failed, iive more assassination mO\·:d. to .Las \. egas Tto ~ea~ \ 'a5t,o's food. T:'e pabon wa.-
j)ear:-:ed the net:!ll, from _... t "h up b!lUonalre Howard Hug!les "pposed to take three i~ays 10
! ~'O~rces w;~cse credentials are team" \\er - sent .0 Cuba. L.e :\~ .... ada operation.s, : . \'. By the time Castro died
; teyond Question. last team reporte-dJ'y made it! :,Iaheu re-cr:.Jited :I..~Q:.:." '" sY3tem 'would f~row off ali
i We spoke to John :'IlcCone. to a rooltop within shooting; seJE, a l"ug,,;edly handsome i t: \?S of the poison. so he
I who he:lded the CIA at the distance of Castro before they ~gam""'t;.ler with contacts In both i \\'1 \ 'd aooear to be the victim
:time'o{ the assassination at- were apprthended, Thishap-;the .-\merican and Cuban un·lof '. ':atUr3!iI mysteriou~ail-
! tempts. He acknowled~ed the pened wound the last of Feb-, derworlcts, to arrange the as-: m~, \
Iidea had be~n discussed inside ruary or first of :i\Jarch, 1%3. i .'iassinat!on. The dapper, hawk-I H,; .'Ji arranged with a
i the CU. but ins:sted it had Nine months later, Presi·: faced Roselli. formerly mar-, C:.:b;; '\ related to one or Cas-
I been "r e j e <: ted immedi. dent Kennedy was gunned! ded to moyie actress June: tro's .' ':" to plant the dearth'
!al£'ly." He vi;;:orously denied down in Dallas by Lee Harvey Lang. was a power in 'the pe.llcl' .- the dictator's food.
·that the CIA had ever partid- Oswald. a fanatic '...·no pre· movie :ndusuy until his can· On :'II.: .', 13.1961. Roselli de-
pated in any plot on Castro's viOllSly had agitated fpr C3S' viction with racketeer Willie 1iver~d ',. c:lDsule5 ,I) hl.s "on.'
me. ASKed w~e(her the at- tro in ~ew Orleans and had Bioff in a million-doll.ar Holly· tact at .' . .,:n.i' Ee3cll's I;lamor-
telT':ots could ha~'e heen made made a mysterious trip to the wood labor shakedown. The OU] ?Oll.l :iehleau lIutt'l.
with his kno·...·ledge. he re- Cuban Embassy in l\Iexico CI.-\ as~igned two of its most A cou~.' "f '.l:U($ later, just
ulied: "It -:ouJd not have hap· City. trustE'd operat.ives. WilHam about !:~, ,'[ Z;,t t[me ior the
pened." Among those privy to the Harvey and .Tames iBig Jim) plot to ..... - 'been !.•H,;€'d out,
,\Ye have cO!11:;>lde conIi- CIA conspiracy, there is still a O'Connell, to Li.e hush·hush a r?pe" ·;;t fJi Ha·.a~l:1 ~aid
: l~ence how e ~. e r, in our nag gin g suspicion-unsup- murder mission. using phony Cas~;o .:;< ill. 31.:~ ;!e reo
!sourc~s_ ported by the Warren Com- names, tr.ey accompanied Ro- coverF,'d ",';ore thena;. f)f ?jgs
; The plot to knock off Castro r.l!ssion's findings-that Cas- .-elli on trips to ?lliami to line in·'asion. . \pril 17, ;!ii,~1.
'l:egan llS ;J3,t -1,[ the Bay of t.ro hecame aware of the u.S. up the assassination teams. Four n'," &tt~m;,'~ "'<'rt>
; Pi:;s lIP~~'llifln, ":"he ~nlt~T!t v;as r-1nt ~Jpon 11:" 1;:"" ~:nd ~'.)~~ The,f~ll story re!ds ~jk~ t~lP ;:1adp' Crt · .. ,t7"o·~ ~;~:a .
. tv l..~ii:n::r~:·~ Lt'.e :·u~an dh·r.a how :·~·t :--~:ia~Cllj:.·""a; ~ ~(I "··ta;· ..:::; 'r:- ::; ~1 .Ja:nes .:.)ona .:1;)°/je,
w
.:- .:.::-;~. :3'"<> .... 1::;- 3... ~:" .. ~! ,. :~Jc
00018
<.
.
•
"
Bl1
('
-,r.0 " ...
J 10')
0001.9
rt '5"T 117 .. J ) ,e
7
.*1m ::nnrmr7t'n *'1 ,

TTII ;. ·llm· . . . . . . . . .
.....
':lIr.'\ .
., .....
00020
\. {) • '-- '-.... 10..' •• '.
PROJECT MOCKINGBIRD
----_.- --------- - - - - -
Project Mockingbird, a telepl10ne intercept activity, was conducted

between 12 March 1963 and 15 June 1963, and tar geted two Washington-
based newsrnen who, at the time, had been publishing news articles
based on, and frequently quoting, clas sified materials of this Agency
and others, including Top Secret and Special Intelligence.
Telephone intercept connections were installed at the newmen's

office and at each of their homes, for a total of 3. The connections
were established with the assistance of a telephone company official
who responded to a personal request by the Director of Security, Col.
Sheffield Edwards. Col. Edwards' authority for the activity was Mr.
John A. McCone, Director of Central Intelligence. The latter conducted
the activity in coordination with the Attorney General (Mr. Robert Kennedy),
the Secretary of Defense (Mr. Robert McNamara), and the Director of
the Defense. Intelligence Agency (Gen. Joseph Carroll)~ In addition to
Office of Security personnel directly involved in the intercepts and
research of materials acquired therefrom, only 3., other Agency
officials are on record as witting of the activity: the Deputy Director
of Central Intelligence (General Marshall S. Carter), the Inspector
General (Lyman Kirkpatrick) and the General Counsel. (Mr. Lawrence
Houston).
The intercept activity was particularly productive in identifying con-

tacts of the new smen, their method of operation and many of their sources
of information. For example, it was determined that during the period they
received data from 13 newsmen, 12 of whom were identified; 12 senators
and 6 members of Congress, all identified; 21 Congressional staff members,
of whom 11 were identified; 16 government employees, including a staff
member of the White House, members of the Vice President's office, an
A~sistant Attorney General, and other well-placed individuals. A number
of other sources were partfally or tentatively identified, but the short span
of the activity precluded positive identification. It was observed that through
these contacts the newsmen actually received more classified and official
data than they could use, and passed some of the stories to other newsmen
for release, establishing that many "leaks" appearing under other by-lines
were actually from the sources of the target newsmen.
Since the termination of Project Mockingbird, those materials related

to it which were retained, have been maintained under strict security access
of two Office of Security professionals.
00021
: 'I ~ " "t ~ ~ . J, ., 1*' _,",,' ~ '" ~~ " I ,-' -;-. "I ., ~,--,-·'1'1"----
'v .. :::. _~, f'·
1 \ ~ \'-:"'~..- " .> I··~
"'~ ~
\ ...
....;.
\.
..
. ':"-'
...
.1'
00022
"'~IIm!l'll1l ..
' g'",...'..,.""",'~~;"';';;';;'-:;";"'''''':'',~==;,: .~-: .. _.__ .....
.. L.." Iii', .,1
SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko
Yuriy Ivanovich NosenkQ, an officer of the KGB,

defected toa representative of this Agency in Geneva,
Switzerland, on 4 February 1964. The responsibility for
his exploitation 1vas assigned to the then SR Division of
the Clandestine Service and he was brought to this country
on 12 February 1964. After initial interrogation by
representatives of the SR Division, he was moved to a safe-
house in Clinton, Maryland, from 4 April 1964 where he
was confined and interrogated until 13 August 1965 when
he was moved to a s:ecian y constructed "j ail" in a remote
wooded area atJ I The SR Division was convinced
that he was alspa ched agent but even after a long
period of hostile interrogation was unable to prove their
contention and he was confined at I lin an effort
to convince him to "confess."
This Office together with the Office of General
Counsel became intr~asingly concerned with the illegality
of the Agency's position in handling a defector under
these conditions for such a long period of time. Strong
representations were made to the Director (Mr. Helms) by
this Office, the Office of General Counsel, and the
Legislative Liaison Counsel, and on 27 October 1967, the
responsibility for Nosenko's further handling was transferred
to the Office of Security under the direction of the Deputy
Director of Central Intelligence, then Admiral Rufus Taylor.
Nosenko was moved to a comfortable safehouse in
the Washington area and was interviewed under friendly,
.sympa thetic conditions by his Security Case Officer, Mr.
Bruce Solie, for more than a year. It soon became
apparent that Nosenko was bona fide and he was moved to
more comfortable surroundings with considerable freedom
of independent movement and has continued to cooperate
fully with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and this
Office since that time. He has proven to be the most
00023
Sf ET
YtS fiNLY
.' .
valuable and economical defector this Agency has ever

had and leads which were ignored by the SR Division were
ex lored and have resulted in the arrest and prosecution
e curren y 1 lIng
un er an a las; secure Ivorce from his Russian wife
and remarried an American citizen. He is happy, relaxed,
and appreciative of the treatment accorded him and states
"while I regret my three years of incarceration, I have
no bitterness and now understand how it could happen."
00024
SEC T
tS Ot~ty
J ••
""'.. /
.' •••
,:4;,"
\
i:
~ .
.1 .
00025
"I. SURVEILLANCES
A. I- - - -
During the periods 1-20 February, 12 April-7 May,
and 9-20 August 1971, a surveillance was conducted of
/a former staff employee, and
Lr"1-----------lr1a....-rL,-.Ud.D an nat i on a1 with ,dlOffi
Ibecome professionally and emo-
~t~1~o~n~a~1"1r.y~~1~n~v~o~,lr.v~e~:c~1-.~Surveillance was predicated upon
information thatl I had been seeking from
employees information In Information Processing Division
files, and that employees were visiting a photographic
studio operated byl ~n Fairfax
City, Virginia. In addItIon to phYSICal surveillance,
one surreptitious entry of the photographic studio was
made, and an attempt to enter the apartment ofl I
was aborted because of a door lock problem.
B.
Pursuant to a request from the CI Staff, approved
by the DCI, surveillances were conducted ofl
I 1971. 5
and her associates ·at various times from May;-·t:-;o::;---<Sr.--::::-e~p+t--;:;ec;:;m"b::-:e;::-:r;;;--
-::;a":idl"'lr:o::;-:n;:;-;:;g-;::b--;::e:-::e::-:n~a;:;--;::s-;:o~u;-:;r;::-;c:::-:e~-;:::;:o-:J:f~t=-1h:;-;e~mwt:JH-'Dr:;1'Vr:1~s;::-:;-1-;=;:o"'n-----ra""n"d"-----~
had g1ven information regarding a plot to assassinate
or kidnap Vice President Agnew and the DCI. Surveil-
lances included coverage of the activities of Miss King
during two visits to the United States, technical cover-
age of debriefings of her by WH Division representatives
in New York City, and surveillance, including mail cover-
age, of several American citizens alleged·to be part of
the plot. Although most of the surveillance occurred in
New York City, surveillance of one of the individuals
included extensive coverage of a commune in Detroit.
C. CELOTEX I
At the direction of the DCI, a surveillance was con-
ducted of Michael Getler of the Washington Post during
SE ET 00026
tyt~ Of~LY
D,·r ~1 Y
! ,'~
~BE.~
the periods 6-9 October, 27 October-lO December 1971

and on 3 January 1972. In addition to physical sur-
veillance, an observation post was maintained in the
Statler Hilton Hotel where observation could be main-
tained of the building housing his office. The sur-
veillance was designed to determine Getler's sources
of classified information of interest to the Agency
which had appeared in a number of his columns.
D. CELOTEX II
At the direction of the DCI, surveillance was con-
ducted of Jack Anderson and at various times his "leg
men," Britt Hume, Leslie Whitten, and Joseph Spear,
from 15 February to 12 April 1972. In addition to the
physical surveillance, an observation post wa~ main-
tained in the Statler Hilton Hotel directly opposite
Anderson's office. The purpose of this surveillance
was to attempt to determine Anderson's sources for
highly classified Agency information appearing in his
syndicated columns.
E. BUTANE
At the direction of the DCI, a surveillance was
conducted on Victor L. Marchetti from 23 March to
20 April 1972. The purpose of this surveillance was
to determine his activities and contacts both with
Agency employees and other individuals in regard to
his proposed book and published magazine articles ex-
posing Agency operations.
II. POLICE SUPPORT
A. During 1969, 1970, and 1971, on several occasions,
the Intelligence Division of the Metropolitan Police
Department was provided a communications system to
monitor major anti-Vietnam war demonstrations in the
Washington area. This system consisted of a radio
receiver and an Agent at the Intelligence Division
Headquarters and several automobiles from the Washington
Field Office equipped with radio receivers and trans-
mitters and manned by two WFO Agents, as well as a
representative of the Intelligence Division, Metropolitan
Police Department. The benefit to the Agency was, that
the communications over this system were monitored at
the Headquarters Building to provide instant notice of
possible actions by the dissidents against Agency in-
stallations. '
00027
~:r'
\(..£Iir~-u_
B. During the period from 1968 to 1973, several
items of positive audio equipment consisting pri-
marily of clandestine transmitters and touch-tone
dial recorders were loaned to the Metropolitan
Police Department, Fairfax County, Virginia, Police
Department, Montgomery County, Maryland, Police
Department, New York City Police Department, and the
San Francisco, California, Police Department.
III. GENERAL SUPPORT
A. SRPOINTER
Since 1953, this office has operated a mail inter-
cept program of incoming and outgoing Russian mail
and, at various times, other selective mail at Kennedy
Airport in New York City. This operation included not
only the photographing of envelopes but also surrepti-
tious opening and photographing of selected items of
mail. The bulk of the take involved matters of inter-
nal security interest which was disseminated to the
Federal Bureau of Investigation. This program is now
in a dormant state pending a decision as to whether
the operation will. be continued or abolished.
B. AELADLE
For several years the Office of Security has pro-
vided support to Anatole Golitsyn, a Russian defector of
interest to the CI Staff. I
C. REDFACE I
In July 1970, this office made a surreptitious
entry of an office in Silver Spring, Maryland, occu-
pied by a former defector working under contract for
the Agency. This involved by-passing a contact and
3
00028
O;~LY
sonic alarm system, entering a vault, and entering
a safe within the vault. The purpose of the opera-
tion was to determine whether the individual had
any unauthorized classified information in his
possession.
D. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS AND DANGEROUS DRUGS
In January 1971, the Director approved a request
from the Director, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous
Drugs, to provide covert recruitment and security
clearance support to BNDD. This has been accomplished
through the medium of a proprietary of the Office of
Securit known as and 0 eratin as I
--rS"""'u""-:p"""'p""'o=-=r..,. .,t",. . -
'-.-_...----~------,---------._--,-- ~-~_-----.J
Inc Udes covert recruItment, Inves Iga lon, polygraph,
medical clearance, and training. It has been divided
into three phases: (1) A CI operation to place indi-
viduals in BNDD field offices to monitor an ille a1
activities of other BNDD employees; (2)
)
ecruitment 0 an In IVI by BNDD
but actually employed by BNDD, although this fact is
known only to the Director and Chief Inspector, BNDD.
In this case, arrangements were made for all pay and
other employee beriefits to come from CIA on a reim-
bursable basis.
E.
F. MERRIMAC
From February 1967 to November 1971,& lan
Office of Security proprietary, recruite anu nanuI d
several Agents for the purpose of covertly monitoring
4
00029
SEG T
fP-MlY
ON
..
rr' ~v
.Dos .... Ullot ...V
q:~l
dissident groups in the Washington area considered
to be potential threats to Agency personnel and
installations. One of these Agents so successfully
penetrated one dissident group that she was turned
over to the FBI for handling. In addition, during
this period, the Office of Security field offices
were tasked with collecting available intelligence
on dissident groups. All such information was in-
cluded in a periodic report distributed to appro-
priate parts of the Agency and to certain outside
Government agencies.
G.: F. I
,---------=====~--------------------,
5
00030
, .. '.
,,', '
00031
' .. ;\ '
"~, ......
MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS
BY SECURITY FOR ISSUANCE TO
LOCAL POLICE
ITEM 9-UA_liITY
Gas Mask M-9 200
Gas Mask ]\1-17 196
Steel Helmet and Liners 231
Vest and Groin Protector 96
Vest, Flak M-52 34
Vest, Protective 46
Vest, Grenade 105
Execuvest 6
Emergency Flashing Red Light 22
*Searchlight, Tear Gas 36
*Chemical Baton 6 1/2" 36
*Chemical Baton 12" 24
·*Chemical Baton 26" 24
*Mustang 35 Pistol 6
'~Searchlight with Shoulder Strap 36
*Stun Gun 3
*NOTE: Various quantities and types of replacement chemical

cartridges, loading kits, and batteries were also
ordered for asterisk items.
Sf _ _ _ _1032
u ONLY
....-
.......-
....... .
.t....
. e.
00033
SUBJECT~ Audio Countermeasures Support to the
United States Secret Service
On 25 July 1968, and at the specific request

of the United States Secret Service, this Office pro-
vided two audio countermeasures technicians to the
United States Secret Service in connection with the
Democratic National Convention held in Chicago, Illinois.
This was not an official detail although both men were
provided with temporary credentials identifying them
as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service.
On IS August 19~8, we detailed the same two men
to the United States Secret Service to cover the
Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida. On
both occasions, the team members were debriefed upon
their return and it is clear that their activities were
confined exclusively to sweeping the candidates and
potential candidates quarters.
OOOM
~ . ~.~
.. ' , ... '
.",.~.
00035
15 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Hm",rard Osborn

Director of Security
SUBJECT Identification of Activities with
Embarrassment Potential for the Agency
1. In responding on 7 May by memorandum to the DDO's

request for the identification of any incident which might
conceiv~bly have an embarrassment potential for the Agency,
I cited the equipment test which is mentioned in the attached
memo. The test in uestion was related to the development of
,
~~~~~were in and out of some four hotels in Miami, with
radio equipment. This was shortly before the political con-
ventions, and at least one of the hotels was within a block
of the convention hall.
>:-_ o.•
2. Although this completely innocent--although sub-

ject to misconstrual--activity may already have been drawn
to your attention by your ,own staff,~it has occurred to us
that we should ensure you are awar£ of it,· given the involve-
ment of a Security officer,
Chief, Division(1)
Att:
M/R dated 7 Ma: 73 by
I SUb): I
Test, Mlaml,
~ la.,
qU1pmen~
Aug 71
cc:D 00036
7 May 1973
}1E'J10RANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT I IEquipment Test, Hiami, Florida,

August 1971
The following details concerning

roents for Subject tests were provided by
I I during a telephone co~n~v~e~r~s~a~~~~~-
the underslgned, 7 May 1973.
,- ~ ~~rL~,_~~~r~e~t~i=,red, formerly assigned to

for the August 1971 Field
'-<:::;;;;;:::::::::::::=;=====r=:::::;::::;;:::::::::::::=r'---------L---------------l-------------=__, Securi ty
arrangements or e es an e on ehalf of 1-----""----1
and the2vis~tors b~1 l~~n conjunction witn the
~ ~ ecurlt~ Offl.cer, ,wnq w~s I ~
at the llne. [ flvas in daily contact Wl.th 1
1 IMiami ~OI ce 1« the course of his official llaISO
duties.
Iwas reluctant- to calli lat home

~~====~t~e~I~ephone line. to inquire about the specifics
I arrangements at this point, and suggested
·I---r-----'=!,====="security Officer by' this time might have
ack to ffeadquarters and be available for
I
I
.j The writer called I k DIV(DSecurity
I Officer, who verified ~he fact thatl Jindeed is
: . stationed at Headquarters, with a current assl.gnment to a
I ~_located in I
1 I
phone connectl.ons:
h rrs
a va i 1 ab 1 e '--v--:!l--:a--'t;-hor.:-:-e----:lf,....,o=-'l'l....--=-o-.. .,:-:":I;:-n::-:g=--t...---e. .l--:e---
.
-- -1_ _-------,----_-
The above details were provided by telephone toc===J
______~I Chief, Division D at 1650 hours this date.
(Si g ned1.1
Distribution:
Orig - : File
00037 1_--------'
"LJ: l:::~(US~[r:!ED
. . - • • , .. : - - _ _ . . . . . _ , : . . . . . . _.~ •• ~
LJ
- •• _ . - . _ - - - - - - -
< -P
6~AL\
_~ _ _ ~ ......, . .. .'".~ ••• _ . _
L.J (OUfl
- . - - , - - - - . - - • . •~ . . . . ~ _.• - ,
ROUTlNG ftJ~D r~ECOr~D SHEET

-SU~)ECT:'-{O~~::~:~~--·_------·-------·--·--_·_·-_·-.-------------.------.-.-
...-
FrOM:
-.------ -- -----.--------.-.----- -- -.--
EXT':"S',;)N
-
I
'1-..- - - - - - - - - - - - - . - . - - - - - - - - -..-.
NO.
I-D;.re-----------·-·---------·-·-
Director of Securit
. - -•. -----..--.- --.-....-. - .. -------.-----"--1
TO: (O~c..(:( d~:.iS-.c~ion, r.:.cm n'.Jmber, and DATE
OrtICt~'S COII.MENTS (Number eoch comment to ,how from whom
building) 1-.-----,---.-.-- J~,IT!AlS to 'Whom.. Otaw a lint! ccrc~s column ofter aoch ccrnment.)
HalVED fOl:WARDED
____.__. ----------------_._-------1
Ex. Dir. -Compt.

------------=------1------ - .-_...- -----I
2.
J.
}
I
I
I 5.
i
!
\
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
00038
13.
u.
15.
Ii" lJ
TT ,~',:I_I
:li
-
~~:~ 61 0 us~Dr~~~us ~
_ .. __ ~ __:1~~·~~·-~l~~.: ._ '_ .1.
0
.• _ . "., •._
CONF IDENTIAL
•...
o INTERNAL
USE ONLY o UNCLASSIFIED
. ~-.~. .
j ~.: . .l: :
. i .;
'. t I
\ J' • 1'• •• .: ~
1 •5 r- r-
;f:
8 .,.u72
MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Direetor-Cornptroller
SUBJECT ROSELLI, John
1. This menlorandmTI is for your inforrnation only.
2. Reference is made to our recent conversation regarding

the Agency's participation in political as sassinations. Attached
hereto is a memorandum dated 19 November 1970 which was fur-
nished to Mr. Helms setting forth the circumstances of the Subject's
activities on behalf of the Agency. Initially Roselli was unwitting
of Government interest, but as time went on, he suspected that the
U. S. Government was involved and specifically the CIA.
3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for con-

spiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, Washington and awaits
deportation upon completion of his current sentence.
4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to expose

his participation in the plot should we not intervene on his behalf.
The DCI decided to ignore his threats and take a calculated risk as
to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his story.
This was subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf fur-
nishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are
two of Anderson's art~cles dealing with Roselli. Anderson is also
Editor of the Washington Bureau of the Washington Post, Sunday
supplemental "Parade. "
5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs.

Dulles, Bissell, Colonel J. C. King, Colonel Sheffield Edwards,
00039
.. "-
• t
William Harvey, and Jar-nes P. O'Connell. Also included were

Robert A. Maheu and his attorneys Edward P. Morgan and Edward
B enoett Williarn s.
6. On 26 February 1971 arrangements were nlade with

Imrnigration and Naturalization Service Comrnissioner Rayrnond
Farrell to flag any action that may be taken by his organization
regarding deportation proceedings against Roselli. On 26 January
1972 JaTnes F. Green, Associate Commissioner for I&NS, advised
that they were deferring any deportation action for another year
and would again call it to our attention upon cxpir ation of the
deferral.
Director urity
Atts
00040
SEC EJ
r.:S
f:
f~ iiJ LV
Uh.
, .
,
M.EMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Con,ptroller
SUBJECT HOSELLI, John
1. Tbis :r..Jcrnorandum is for your _i_nJc:.~rrlation only.
Z. Reference is made to our recent conversation regarding

the Agency's participation in political assassinations . .Attached
hereto is a memorc:.ndum dated 19 November 1970 which was fur-
nished to Mr. HeiniB $etting forth the circmnstancee of the Subject's
activities on behd! of the Agency. Initially Roselli was umt:itting
- i
of Government interest. but as time went on, he suspected that the
!
U. S. Covernment was involved and specifically the CIA.
I
3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for con-
spiracy in a Federal penitentiary in Seattle, 'Washington and awaits
deportation upon completion of his current sentence.
4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to expose

his participation in the plot should we not intervene on his behalf.
The DCI decided to ignore his thrcats and take a calculated risk as
to the consequences that may occur with the disclosure of his story.
This WB& subsequently done by Roselli or someone on his behalf fur-
nishing Jack Anderson details of the incident. Attached hereto are
hvo of A nderson's articles dealing with Roselli. Anderson is also
Editor of the Vlashington Bureau or the Washington Post, Sunday
supplemental "Parade."
5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs.

Dullcs, Bissell, Colonel J. C. King. Colonel Sheffield Edwards,
'00041
. ',;
'W illiCJm Harvey. o. nd Jame s P. 0 'Connell. Also included were

Rob('rt A. }...'f<theu c;nd hie attorneys Edward P. Morgc:n arld Edward
BE'nnett \Yilliams.
6. On 26 February 1971 arrangements were made with

111.)1'1:i(;1'11 tion 0. nd J:hl tu rc.lization Se rvi ce C amnii s sio ne r n r. yrn 0 nd
Farrell to £la.g any action that may be taken by his organi<'.ation
rega rding deportation proceedings egainst Roselli. On 26 Ja nuary
1972 James F. Green • .A s socie-te CommissicnE!r for I&NS. advised
that they \'i'ere deferring any deportation action for another )'car
and would again call it to our a ttention upon expir Cltion of the
deferral.
ftowa ra J lAJsborn
Atts
I
·1
i
.
00042
('
c.
.,
i
.
Atts
(.
~
I
.
~. l
~':- ........ r
,
:.
00043
\.
, I
l\U~:t\'[On.ANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
SUBJECT ROSFLLI, Johnny
1. This merrlOrandum is for in!orrnation only.
2. In August 1960, Mr. Richard 1\'1:. ,Bissell approached

Colonel Sheffield Edwards to deterrnine if the Office of Security
had assets that may assist in a sensitive mission. requiring
gangster-type action. The mission target was Fidel Castro.
3. Because of its extreme sensitivity, only a small group

was made privy to the project. The DCI was briefed and gave his
approval. Colonel J. C. King, Chief, ,\-YB rivision, was briefed,
but all details were deliberately concealed from any of the
JM"\VAVE officials. Certain TSD and Cornrno personnel partici-
pated in the initial planning stages, but were not witting of the
purpose of the mission. ,
4. Robert A. Maheu was contacted, briefed generally on

the project, and requested to ascertain if he could develop an
entree into the gangster elements as the first step toward accom-
plishing the desired goal.
5. Mr. Maheu advised that he had met one Johnny Roselli

on several occasions while visiting Las Vegas. He only knew
him casually through clients, but was given to understand that
he was a high-ranking member of the 11 s yndicate" and controlled
all of the ice-rnaking machines on the Strip. Maheu reasoned
that, if Roselli was in fact a member of the clan, he undoubtedly
had connections leading into the Cuban gambling interests.
00044
6. Maheu '''/as asked to approach Roselli, who knew l\1"ahC'u
as a personal relations executive handling domestic and foreign
a.ccounts, and tell him that he had recently been reL:. .ined by a
client who rE;pH' GE;llt~;d several international busines s firms
which were suffering IH::avy financial losses in Cuba as a result
of Castro's action. They were convinced that Castro's renloval
was the answer to their problern and VvCl'e willing to pay a price
of $150, 000 for its succes s£ul accornplie.hment. It was to be made
clear to Roselli that the U. S. Governrllent was not, and should not,
become aware of this operation.
7. The .pitch \vas 1T1.ade to Roselli on 14 September 1960 at

the Hilton Plaza Hotel, New York City. His initial reaction was
to avoid getting involved but, through Maheu's persuasion, he
agreed to introduce him to a friend, Sam Gold, who knew the
"Cuban crowd. II Roselli made it clear he did not want any money
for his part and believed Sam\,\'ou1d feel the same way. Neither
of these individuals was ever paid out of Agency funds.
8. During the week of 25 September, Maheu was introduced

to Sam who was staying at the Fontainebleau Hotel, Miami Beach.
It was several weeks after his rneeting \vith Sam and Joe, who was
identified to him as a courier operating between Havana and Miami,
that he saw photographs c;>f both of these individuals in the Sunday
supplemental "Parade.' 1 They were identified as Momo Salvatore
Giancana and Santos Trafficant, respectively. Both were on the '
list of the Attorney General's ten most-wanted m.en. The former
"vas described as the Chicago chieftain of the Cosa Nostra and
successor to Al Capone, and the latter, the Cosa Nostra boss of
Cuban operations. Maheu called this office-immediately upon as-
certai:ling this information.
9. In discussing the possible methods of accomplishing this

mission, Sam suggested that they not resort to firearms but, if
he could be furnished some type of potent pill, that could be
placed in Castro's food or drink, it would be a much more effective
operation. Sam indicated that he had a prospective nominee in the
person of Juan Orta, a Cuban official who had been receiving kick-
back payments from the gambling interests, who still had access
to Castro, and was in a financial bind.
00045
I
-:~
- .
] O. TSD was requested to produce six pills of high lethal

content.
11. Joe delivered the pills to erta. /\.fter severa.l weeks

of reported atternpts, OTta apparently got cold fect and asked out
of the assignxnent. He suggested 2.Dother c;:mdioate who rnade
several attenlpts \vithout success.
12. Joe then indicated that Dr. Anthony Verona, one of the
principal officers in the Cuban E:>-.:ile Junta, had become disaffected
with the apparent ineffectual pTogre s s of the Junta and \":2.5 \villing
to handle the rr:<is5ion through his own rebources.
13. He asked, as a prerequisite to the deal, that he be

given $10, 000 for organizational expenses and requested $1.000
worth of cOlnmunications equipment.
14. Dr. Verona' 6 potential was never fully exploited, as

the project was canceled shortly after the Bay of Pigs episode.
Verona was advised that the offer was withdrawn, and the pills
were retrieved.
15. Of significant interest was an incident which involved

a request levied by SaITl upon Maheu.
At the height of the project negotiations, Sam

e>...-pressed concern about his girlfriend, Phyllis McGuire,
who he learned was 'g~tting much attention from Dan
Rowan while both were booked at a Las Vegas night club.
SaITl asked Maheu to put a bug in Rowan's room to deter-
mine the extent of his intimacy with Miss McGuire. The
technician involved in the as sigmnent was discovered in
the procea s, arrested, and taken to the Sheriff's office
for questioning. He called Maheu and inform.ed him. that
he had been detained by the police. This call was made
in the presence of the Sheriff's personnel.
Subsequently, the Department of Justice an-

nounced its intention to prosecute Maheu along with
the technician. On 7 February 1962. the Director of
3
r.'JL,.
." '.'. (\'.
00046
...... l
Security briefed the Attorney General, Robert
Kennedy, on the circumst.anccs leading up to
Maheu's involvement in the -,viretap. At our re-
quest, prosecution wc::.s d:coJ?ped.
16. In 11ay 1962, Ivir. 'Nillia.m Harvey took over as Case

Officer, and it is not Imown by this Office whether P.oselli was
used operationally frOl1'l that point on.
17. It was subsequently learned from the FBI that Roselli

had been convicted on six counts involving illegal entry into the
United States. Our records do not reflect the date of conviction,
but it is believed to have been sornetime during November 1967.
18. On 2 December 1968, Roselli, along with four other

individuals, was convicted of conspiracy to cheat member s of the
Friars Club of $400,000 in a rigged gin gummy game.
19. Mr. Harvey reported to the Office of Security of his

contacts with Roselli during November and De-cember 1967 and
January 1968. It was his belief that Johnny would not seek out
the Agency for assistance in the deportation proceedings unless
he actually faced deportation. Roselli expressed confidence that
he would win an appeal. ,
20. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James OIConnell,

Roselli's first Case Officer. to advise that Maheu's attorney. Ed
Morgan, had received a call from a Thomas Waddin. Roselli's
lawyer, who stated that alLavenues of appeal had been exhausted.
and his client now faces deportation. Waddin indicated that, if
someone did not intercede on Roselli's behalf, he would make
a complete e"-"p0se of his activities with the Agency.
21. On 18 November 1970, you were briefed on the latest

development in this case. and it was decided that the Agency
would not in any way assist Roselli. Maheu was so advised of
the Agency's position, and he was in complete agreen"lent \,;,rith
our stand. He further advised that he was not concerned about
00047
•
1.
,
."
. any publicity as it affi::cted him personally should Roselli decide

to tell all. :Ee stated he v.'ould advise us promptly of any develop-
lnents that he n-;ay becorne aVlare of in this niatter.
Howard J. Osborn
00048
(
THE WASlII:,\CTOX POST J~follda)', Jilt!.

, I.
lS, 19:1 ~0
':".J
·7
-----------------.---------
~ ..L.'...~:';"
JJ 1";- itGl.C/
,0 7'11'l -;n ff Q
\UI ;j L it; if)) vr2:J
. 11..
By luch Anderson '1(,r before the n;ot1ey im':Jd· iale against President Ken.:comp1t't(' I'··'h seen:! tr:,.~ls at .
,Iglltterln~ :\liaml Beach hotels: ~
,
Lockea
, ,
In
• i ers
th<, darkest reo arrival was expected to touch I
landed on the island. Theirim'dY. .
To set up the Castro aSS1iSSl-! and m 1 d il j g h t pO'serboat;
cesscs of the ~(-'ntral ,Intelli. off II general uprising, which nation., the CIA enlisted l::~h:': dashrs to ~('~ret ;;.ndl .. ;; ~;Jo~s .-
I
,gence A 6 ency 1S the slory of I the Communist militia would ....c~~~I~ a f0rmcr 1: Bll on the Cur,an (,0;,5:, Or,cr, no- :
',SiX "ss;.5sin;lt;on atlr;npts'l' 'C h' d "ore t-'uble rut'in;;3cicnt \'.'ltn shadowy contaets, :selJi's b0at W,15 o11ot Out :rom .-
,<lgainst Cuba's ridel Castro. I '<1' • •~ who had handled other under·! under him. <.
I
<1., 01. . ' i) L
For 10 years, (mly a few key i down WIthout the ehilflsmallc cover ass,lgnmen~s for the ~I,A }l'or the finl. try, the CIA: /.
people have known the terri.! Castro to lead them. out ?f hIS Wa,shmgton puolle fu~nished Roselli wilh :;peci:il:(
ble secret. They have sworn After the first attempt relations offIce. He later IpOlson capsules to slip lnto.~·
never to talk. Yet we have- failed five more assas~ination moved to Las Vegas to head I Castro's food. Tht> ptji~on wns
lcnrned
!beyond question.
the details f r o m ' C
I
sources whose credentials are teams were sent to uba. ne Xevnda operations.
T' up billionaire Howard Hughes' I supposed to take' :~lree O<iVS to
I"ct. By the timc' (';,:;t iO died
,last team reportedl'y made it. ]'I'Iaheu recruited John Ro- his system woule: 1 hrow off ali
We s;:ioJ,e to John, :l\lcCone, to. a rooftop within shooting lselli, a ruggedly handsome traces of the poj~on, so he
I
I I
who headed the CIA at the distance of Castro before theY I gambler ",:,ith contacts In both would appear to be the vIctim
I
time' of the assflsslnation at-, were apprehended. This hap: the Amerlean and Cuban un- 'I of a natural if mysterious ail·
tempts~ He acknowledged thelpened around the last of Feb-Iderworlds, to 81Tange the as- ment.
,idea had been discussed inside I ruary or first of :t\Tareh, ]963. .1 sassination. The dapper, hawk- . Roselli arranged with 11..,
ie CIA .but insisted it had
I
l\ine months later, Presl-,fared Roselli, formerly mar-iCuban. related to one of Cas.
..een lOr e j e c ted immcdi-l dent Kennedy was gunned: ried to movie actress JUne tro's, chefs, to pl:mt the deadly'
I ately." He vigorously den~c~ Idown in Dallas b~ Lee Harvey I Lan~. ,was a pov:~r In the pellets in the dicialor's f.ood.
Ithat the CIA r,;Jd cver partlCl'l Oswald, a fanatic. who pre· movIe meustry until his con· I On :t\Iarch 13, 1961. 11ose111 de. :
I I
I pated in ~ny plot on Castro's viously had agitated ior Cas· \'i.rtio~ \l-1th. r,ackete~r,Wi1lie livered the C:lpsu1c:s to his COl]: .
life. Asked whether thE' at· Itro in Kew Orleans and had BJOff ~n a milllon·dollar Holly-, tact at ~Iiaml Beach's .:lamor-
,
"
','
tempts could have been made I made a mysterious trip to the wood labor shakedown. The ~ ous Fontainebleau Hotel. .
with ~is bowledge, he re·· Cuban Embassy in Mexico CIA assigned t~o of it~. ":os t
plied: "It could not have hap- City. .
lI A couple of weeks later, just
trusted operatl.'es, \~'lllJam :;bout the right time !or thE'
Amon~ those pfiVy to the I Harvey and James (BIg Jim) plot to have been r,,;-ried OUI
I pcned."
I
, We have complete conCi' 1 CIA conspiracy, there is still a O'Connell, to the .hush.hush la report out of Ha\'ana ~airl
'I dencc, howe v e r, in our'l nag gin g SUSPicion-u.nsup- i murder mission. Usmg. phony ICastro was ill. But he r /
sources. potted by the \Varrpn com-l namps, they nccompanted Ro·, covered beIore the Bay of p: i <;
! The plot to knOCK off Castro: mission's findings-that Cas· selli on trips, to .i.riami to line 1invasion' on April 17. 1961.
i
; ?~gan liS p,arl ~r ,the BIlY of iro hera me ~\\'a~c of 1 he U.S. I up the assassmau.on tea~s, I Four mo~e. at:rnJpL\ 1'1. t'
Il'I~S 01"'1';:111.11 'I he rnt(~nt \1'11<;, pInt upon hiS lJ!i' ilnl! ~"m('-' The full story It'ads 11kI' thl' I mll(~(" on Ca~:ro.s il(P,
'Ill ~lilll\ll:';" thE:' Cuban c!i('l<t·t!.\lIr r<'nliite'd t),I\,1ld :'J :I'l;,!· s"l'i·p:. of a ,i"n1(,s Bond mQvie,' ,'U~,.Brn-M<Clurr.,,'~.;:lrl\t /.(
1._ . • ._.. .. _ _-_. _ ..... ...._------_._--
t~
00049 .p~
.:
- I
(
(
THE WASmXGTOX POST Tursr1ay,Fcb.23,1971 Bli
----------
1""I Y .J(I r. II'r

~ r
.'. 11 r,,~} .< n ;7.
,. .',oh iw ;::':';"fjt ;.;;;j:'·ll. ;; j"r·. ';':,:-:-:!i v·-;:h (>ac::; ...,... ·);='('I:1·1~ ~~i~1 0:1 the CIA r,ay;-oll.
~ _ . . ~ ;r.~I-r Fl~r ,.ij:t:-"l, V.;;f) C~.7l;~~rri~c;:~");:':;':5 ·~";ji(;' t.·~. i;;~d ~:?.'~-( .~.~::~i·";~:~: . :;: ..
;~;: a _f~.:,~~~_':;
J he my~lcr~' r:,.in "1'i1("11~1 ,he. 'n~ '··n- ' I'~h
I CC'ft'a} l···lr··1;-r'·c(' .\--rn('\":
; lO
1'<
&.")
t\-·.
1I0L
I"d \-·-r.lrd
p.; ·.d 'Id., .
1'n
I I · ' t..
.!.
I .
4::-. a -.···:\·e
.'-..-.3 1 ,
. .,.
0'. CJ'.'-o·· :,.l: •. \·.. ,..1 •. ·,.'·· .. , ·IL•• • ".,i.":"
_l·.:J .. C ':-'r-o,-- f~- .,
.I.
, .• ) ( ··.uc,:,
·T'
L,.,
; ' . .:;.
l:,' ..
; j, I" ,I,,:" ,J """ ..... dt'rco\·C'r ;is::i:nrncr.l!s for thclCD€'f to plant In tne (1icta~ors: :1~r\'CV ~-;~ ~"\e \··d ~ "~.;-i1 r,-'.
1 •• (\.- ....... r.10 .. ':,c.:,r.;,.ir,:::1(')C :'\.,. • - . :~... ! . . . . . . . . , ... " .... .1 •• l<orI. l• • l ••• ' J ••
jl ll\llll 1 ( - .3.C: \. :rC rc;~:~r·1. ~-t'."I~.;·(\·""r. ~n 1'11-':-;. ~ ~~~':-. r;-;;;;-::::·j;;en or:ned:r::3:"Cl" lor n0~el~1 ~:-:..~~ c:1d· (l
I f"idt'l C:1.~·:iI1 ]'.;~ ;")f"~':l 1'-':<1 '1~'J l~:~:t:;.;.: ihl"\ (ic:;{·:;:;. "t::::. i.:' t:re; ·~:.lth :-,::::,.;... tj·.I.'~;·:'d D(·i;lan ri< t:1tJ Fri;,i""'s ClLii) C;~::f::: ~I "l)i:iYl
"in !ii(' ::ick \I":;rcl cf the Los ~,imc :'l,d]cu, inclclcn;.ii:i~·. wi'lo; fics aUf:U1pted to infiltrdte !rilI'l," SJid Han'cy: "Tne
"\n;::r;es County jail. ! is now in\'o)\'('c! in a lc:.al h;;t-: ci0~e enou;h to bun Castro I Friar's Club incl;~t;::~nt is
lIe is h;'Hjd~rJ ...nC'. hf1\I;k·fCtc('r1 11~ o·.. rr phdnlorn hiii~("Jna;:'c ~do\t.:n. ~r,!:rJi~v. Rf)s~lli hOod ~o f;lore to
1
John TIosclH. (.nee a {~a:;hinz:llrc)'\':::;rd '4:J\· 0... I"~a 1

I ~ '" 1,-u"11"s'
0 \,; .. ' . . . \.. ! a. :• _ 4·\·11
onc,.... - ' - ' ~~::\ n.::.:;,:~r·.:i!~.1~ir':1 a~4~(i,,,\
. t·-I;",! .... '1.:.
•• J'. 0 ''',:'.
l ..... '-
l;,"n
<oJ~.
I h'lr',"
• • .; ~ •
filCure
.... <;r0und Hollywood .:;nd, n'tl'ons • . ' ·... ·r~c ;-;'l,,'i('. 1.::(' )~:·t i:1','
I1 !('mr"s "\r.·.(""·<
.. 1-..... ·,'-5 .-,1",
~ ~~J. J
'. -, -",'"
"., " •.
• • '~
Las \'c;;"s. now a gray. 66-1 no~clliwa.~~oflall('rerloverl~he s;lring of 1(;63. Throu;h":ln'i;:r to ;;:C'I·c1N,-,r.:,::,v ;'.j'
year·old inmatc with a r('spira·1 heing ilsked to perform a 5e"I' out this period, Roseili worked! U;cir -client. citing Oil:" stories
tory ailment. Icret mission for L!;c U.S. go\,· under the di~cct suprn'isio:1' "hout his sC'cret CIA sen·icc.:
Co;;fjrkntial F13l files ir'kn-: crn :11cnt that he paid all his,oi two secret CIA a;;ents. wil·i .
lif)' him <IS "a to!, 7\jilfia fi:;-! (,xp':'nscs out of his own 1;<:"" Har:cy ;;:1d .Ja:nes (Bi;; I i FIn~D.i·m.s Fi:l;'r.o
urc" who '·.· .• IC'!lcrl oyer "the!pockrt and risked his ncck to!jim) O'Co;,,:;('11. 1 • . ,
c?ncC':llrrl. inter('sts i~. L,.s: land the assassination teams i • . I.
l,;ndC'r prcssure rrorr, tile
\'e~~;s casllIos of the Cnlcagol on the Cuban coast. !RO~CI!I'5 Reward If1rC'<Jrms lobby, the Treasury
undcrwo.dd." .' I
In James Bond fashion, he
.Hosclh has admItted to hC'ld whispered meetin::;s in I the assassination plot. has force a vital section 'of the
IThe FBI which gol wind of i Department has failed to en-
I
, ncr O,'lrl'n'"' "nc ~l\"" ~'rl'nN T\\'~n h
I
fncnd~ that h(' W~IS a rum run· "liami Beach hotels with Cu'l tried to pump Roselli for in· 1'"'F:0 f d
. J' " I . ".m C' era
1 f' •.
lreulms
t
_ ac . ,
I .. . ~,'. ~ . " '! ,3ns wl11n~ to make an at·,forrr.a:ion. But he was sworn!
tlrs. OpC'r"lln::: ,lIon;:: thc E;;~t' tronI'lt (In Castro's liie. On('c.1 \0 ~i:ence bv the CIA. and 1.:0 I L,e 1<,W \".S 'i1a~sccl afler
_, " •. ~
CO<lst. he !l'.?l'nC'c! how to evade; hc c"lIed on Chica;o racketi 10 this mo~ent, he hasn't bro. i the murders of Sen. hobert
Coast <;;:ard cutters and pO'1 hoss Sam Giancana to lbe up iken it. !
Ker,nedy and Dr. ;\l<lrtin Lu·
licc patrols. a contact. The cO:1fidential\ :\I~an"l,;hiJe. the Jmllce De-! ther . King, It authorizes t.he
,lI1s ~amc I.a~cr bccilme I inC's report t.hat Giancana had rar~mcnt. as part 01 its crack-I Tre~:sury Sccrctal!.' to reqUJri'
~mkC'd Wit!, the DJ:;:~C'St names I"~am bling interest and an in.!, down on or;;anized cri.me.! full reP?l:'ts of aJlurearms and
In the Chle.l;:o and Los Anee· tcrC'st in the shrimp bl.:siness tried to nail Roselii. The FBIiammUl1l11On sales. .
les 1.:nderworlri~. I ic also de-, in. Cuba." Howe\,cr, the' Chi, di~co\'ered that his Chica;:;o I
:Cor the t'.\·O years that ~:-;c
I
vclopC'd contaL,ts in..tlle cuba~ Cil:::O gan!;stcr took no direct i hirth records had been forgcd.llaw b.s hcen in for~e. ;:].~
unden\'orlrl Detore l;,,~(r.o tOOh:1I'liJrt in the assassination plot. Ithat his .. ame was reaily Fi,IT;-rd~ur~·. ~t'par(ment. na5_~;'
O.I'CI' the JIiil'ana (;itJUullllg ca·:
SlnOS. .
Hosellimade
I I
midni;;ilt Jippo Sacco and that he had I nnr(;-~ t,1 Jl>. ".::y prOViSiOn.. ~ ::~
dash('s to Cuba with his hired COllie to this counlry from! .;un ll1r1u~try has com;>};;,;nro.
,He had the .ri::ht bae.k- as~"ssins in twin po\\"e;-boat~'II~alY as a c.h.Hd. He w.as con. jit. _:~'ould bo a bookkeejJln;:.t
g! ounel for. a hu~h,nush mls,! Once a Cuban patrol ship \'Icted for fallmg to reglster as InJi;l.cmare. .'
sl.on t.hat t~1C CIA was plan,lturned its guns on his dark'!an a l i e n . ' I ~h.c fed('r:!l go\'ernmen,.
I
•
mn Ifnn~~~~l;~:,\S_,part .•of~h(llencd boat.,t0rc a .hol.(' in the i H(' .was also con\'ict'?d for:~\:~lC~_WO.u;n..ha;:C'tOl,c~m~.:l~
7
n.3~ '~l .1' •••, ,,, •••• ,nn.fl.eLl:\lll..,·t()~' • I • JI
." ... ~ ..........
". ,a. ..,
" .. r.~t-c
, •• "I)~'
t
~o'!~~-~""r~c"
......... ' .... I "~'_I
',:') -,1- c,,-,oJ -'J~""""~
IlhoI'lrd 10~,n'),.'~ [llf C'ils:ro and'<rPi W'S x·,'l,..d ot'· of 'he;-t Lo!';' .... n·e~e<· EX ...·'·.;,\"(: :'i:C:i rclU':31·.: :0 .oP·~:iC1 '.:;'
(1. • ~
0;,1."... , \.J
tl,e .','.P" f;.'1I~ . • . :l~ • ..
_
, '.' ........... ~ ....... I:"........ . ~ . '", . J ... l.~ • _l.. .~'.': . . . ' .. : '0:= - . . . • _ .... 4 .. 1 ,... :,~.
.&. ;~ ..... ~.~: ........ ~.:._.
' -• • •' ....
IC""" Ll, .." '",d~"C~". 1\1'""cl' n\'t-·n " . ~.-'1
•.,·,.,,,- _ .• "1... ,,·'·.'Cl' '-rl""~ C ll• ... •~ ,>.'.., ",,, .. on I I. • "),,.f. (, .' • .
I
ell ,.. • ....... ~. 1.. J. '" J , ' ,L , .... ;;" . J. . . . . . .
." 1 ~, I " I'C"'~<II'~~I'

.. \.( ;11'0 tn' c· ~h"·-io\\·s
1\;\.4 ... \. ...... \ " .
Of R~<clll"s t'\·o C1'~ n...
'I'
\,.......
-<<:0_!C01:1!'c;:r.l·S
. .. ... ;;r;;\ 1'1,.:;
~.,
W 11'::.;::-
\
hl~ ,,;:; ;''1(.'(' \. I In ~arli('r rolumn$. we rc. cia!rs. Han:ry has n("l·.\' rE'tired"t:illl lite llrCi;l'!11::: ll1e~.
.r,O~\li!i W.:.\5 recruited for thE' \ ported how CIC CIA furni:.hl?d : to Indian<l~)o:;s and O'Cou:1c:l i :t l~~!. B~::·~.:.,C-:~r~ s:·::~;o·" ... , .
. ,~ -. .... -- ..... _..... .. ...,...
"-..
I
OQ.050
"
.. D( 'f.RNAL
._--- .. ONLY LJ CONr
_---- ..:NTlAL
",
.:
-
AND
_.....
RECORD SHEET
~
ROUTING
SUBJECT: (Optional)
---..----·.. .-.·-.. .·--rtJ---.0 .··----·'--'---'-"-.--------.-..---.----.-.. . . -

FROM:
Howard J. Osborn .
EXTEN510N' NO.
.~
Director of Secu~ O...TE . . .-----------.--;c-
. I IHqs. I I 17 December 1973
-
TO: (Officer de,ignotion, room number, and DATE
building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 show from whom
INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column ofter each commenf.-)
REa/VEO FORWARDED
.----._- ~ ------_. -
1. ~./
IG Staff
~
;J
- --·-----2E~-24--_Mqs .
Attn: I
~7
('V~.!}·<C; -'~ (}~r;-/' CC1.. Al /6V

2.
~_._--.-.~
. \
-----
.---- J
~ ~-
31 ~.
o
/
1)(6 ~~~
....
S'])~ J~ -1 ~ '11..( -~
~ ~\~tk. c..~~
5.
4 ~ l:'" IAA tt q~
~ ~ .e.,
....- .. •
t
"
I. \.
6.
-~
~. jlA ~ ~1
1Lnl
7. ~- l
cYJ
~
8. -
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
1-4. ('
15.
00051:
,
;
~~:: 610 US~Dr~~~~us ~ 0 CONFIDENTIAL o INTERNAL

USE ONLY_
-. _.... .._.. ~. .. ....
~ _. ~ --._," .. ...
" ,-. _...
-'.;. ..... ~ .. _~-_ ... ,,:- ., .... ._ .._---- .,.'. -..... ,
, .
17 Dece~ber 1973
MF1\tJRANDJM FOR TItE P-ECDRD
SUB.JECf: Recent Activities of the Watergate Special

Prosecution Staff
1. Early in the evening of 10 December 1973 I received

r'a- - "-t. : . ;el: :. .e'+~ ~ie l~~;~n~~ile that he, Aad
i l l turn, .recelV: a call from
Intelligence Division, Washington
rn~i'V\1....,..-.,=;on-"PRlr'f7"'"A"TUS'n'!:f'I"'T=~
2. It seems t h a t 5 lhad just spent an hour in

conversation at his home WI I
in the Washington Metropolitanol1ce DeparbJient \\Tfio na:a reported
to him on his interview that afternoon lvi.th a Hr. Ma.rtin and a Mr.
Horowitz, rosecutors of the Watergate Special Prosecution Staff.
L - . r -_ _----'-"-'had=--'b::..;een subpoenaed for his appearance and he indicated
that the two prosecutors were principally concerned
~~;;:=---:~~er=s..-.!:
a. Mlat type of training had the Agency given

members of the Washington 1>1etropolitan Police
Deparbnent? how long were the courses? and
how often were they given? .
b. What support did the Agency provide to the ,
Washington Metropolitan Police Department during
demonstrations occurring in the Washington area
in late 1969 and early 1970?
3. I I
said that he had been shown a long list of
names and asKed if any of them had been involved either lvi.th the
training given the Washington Metropolitan Police Department or the
support to the Washington Metropolitan Police Department during the
demonstrations. L lcould remember only three names on the
list. They were:, I
00052
4. The t1u~ee inaividuals named by I Idid in fact
participate in bot.h the training and support during the demonstrations.
They are only three ClInong others of myl Ispecial
support group ",rho Here involved in these activities. Of extreme
sensitivity is the fact that these sa'1le individuals were engaged in
other highly sensitive activities which could cause the Agency severe
embarrasSI:1cnt if they Here surfaced today in the current 'llYatergate
climate. II
s. I briefed the Director personally on this development

and he indicated that if the training and de.11Oustrations surfaced that
he would simply acknowledge that this had occurred but as he had
assured members of Congress, we '\Yould not engage in this type of
activity in the future. He agreed ",1.th my suggestion that we have the
Legislative Counsel brief Congressman Nedzi and Senator Stennis on
this since they have already been briefed on all activities of this
nature undertaken by the Agency in the past. I briefed Mr. Jo1m
Warner, Acting General Counsel, and a reed with him that we would
make no effort to brief members of my 1 t
until
and if they are subpoenaed. !vir. Warner or members of his Sta f will
then cam:ion them to only answer questions asked and not volunteer
additional infonnation. I am making a copy of this memorandwn available
to I Iof the Inspector General's Staff at the suggestion
of the Inspector General t who I also briefed on this development.
Howard J. Osborn
......··~c: IG Staff Attn: 1 _
00053
l ]
--
12.
13.
15.
(DATE)
fOilM PREvIOUS. rxl
o, lOUSEEDITIONS ~
~_ •• _.
00054
3-62
(47l
REPLACES FORM 10·101
FOR'" NO. 10 I WHICH MAV BE USED.
I AUG 54
0: 'UNOASSIFIED ' D r'[~fl\ -····0 'CONF (~_'H_IA_L_.:...-_'..c::~'::::....-_'_
.. _._ET_·_
r ROUTiNG AND RECORD SHEET ..
lj ~--------"-----------__,._.j
SUBJECT: (Oplional)
I
IL-
I
fROM:
Howard;. Osborn' .
" f
.J;. 0
EXTENSION NO,
_DAll!
25 MAY 1973
.'
j Director of Securi.ty ,/'" I I

, TO: (Ortic., c:!eiignalio", room numb.,. and L:...:.:.....J o.....e OFFicER'S
I INITIALS
COMMENTS (Numbe, each comme,,1 to ihow from whom-
I bv:ldingl ,- ',' -
REO:IYfD
•
'fOllWAilDtD
to whom, Draw a Ii... across column ak~, flOck comm""q
r 1. _ - ... "'- ' . ': .' .' __.... _, _" '.. .", " .
I Execut~ve Secretary",;,'. . (/J<:' £/. --: l-\ ----- ' . --: : , ,- -. _: -" ' . ;'. .
'n .- _. '.., -f.J...Jt
9. ._" . : .. ".~
..... . ~ .. "
-.'.
..... -; ....
..... :" .. ~
;---------------+----!-----j'-----!
, 10. '.
.......
11.
1 12 .
1
1..,----------------+----+---+----1
i-13.
i,
14.
,,
1- .....
~
b.
00055
r0~.'"
j-~2
n CONFI D£NTlAl o I:1TE~NAL
,11<;1= O~IY o UNCLASSIFIED
MEr../10RANDUM FOn.: I:::xecutive Secretary,
CIA Managenl.ent Comnlittee
SUBJECT Project TWO-FOLD
I. Tbis memorandUlu sets forth a recornmcnoation for your

approval in paragraph 5.
2. For the past several years, this office has been support-
ing the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) by spot-
ting, assessing, and recruiting perso.nnel to form an internal
security unit whose primary mission is the detection of corruption
within the BNDD. Subsequent to the recruitment and training stage,
the individuals selected are turned over to the Chief hspector of
BNDD for operational guidance and handling in their various dom-
estic assigr.>ments.
3. Recently, this Agency has extended this activity by

supporting BNDD in the covert acquisition of individuals who are
hired as Staff Agents utilized under nonofficial cover and directed
against the principal international drug traffickers. These indi-
viduals are true eluployees of the BNDD and, although all admin-
istrative details relative to their employment are handled within
the Agency, they' are unaware of any Agency involvement.
4. It is felt at this time that a reaffirmation of our support

to BNDD in Project TWO-FOLD is necessary and desirable.
5. Therefore, it is recommended that approval be granted

for the continuation of Project TWO-FOLD as originally approved
by the Director of Central Intelligence on 12 February 1971.
'r~L-rd J?-9~~ _
Director of(}t.;rity 00056
,------I
· I ( _'".,-;. I,.
.. <
•.
'..,,: ~. ~
......•
.. a
SUBJECT: Project TWO-FOLD
APPROVED:
.-
>
'"
','
--------=-------------
DISAPPROVED:
._-------------..... ------------
Di stribution:
Orig. - Return to OS
1 - ER
1 - IG
* Per Mr. Colby's recommendation and

DCI concurrence, terminate paragraph
2 activity and continue paragraph 3 only
as the activity pertains to foreign assign-
ments to collect narcotics intelligence
abroad. Copy furnished IG.
00057
i. J
_; . r '
",t'.'... i • " J IJ l
IJ •
., ''l
[I j.
~- ~ -; _r
~
~ •.• C'.LY
ROUTl~"G AND r~ECOkD SHtET .. x
J-----.-.--- --..---- _ .. - -.--.--..- - -..- .. -.---.-.--.----.-.- .- - - - -..---.-.. --- ------- -- _.-
SUBJECT: (Op';onal)
FROM: EXTcr~SION NO.
=======~
, - - - -.. .!:::I .---------f---- _~A_TE_--~!;-~-a-Y~9-7-3······-·-....-.---.--.-.-- ..
TO: (Officer d.,:gn"t;on. room number, and DATE
gl COMMENTS (Number each commenl 10 ,how from whom
-=:din ..__. -R·f·~;:rl·-

;;~W~~;;; ~~W1~S to whom. Draw a line OcrOH column after each comment.)
1.
Broe
.. _------ .. ---_ .. _._- -----_._-- -_._... -- - - - -
2.
3.
f-..- - - -
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. 00058
D CONFIDENTIAL D INTERNAL
USE ONLY D UNCLASSIFIED
-.'.,-'J'
~';;~. ~,.j
.,-,:~.j
'~
U'May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD

i
I SUBJECT: General: Office of Security Survey
.,I~~~,. . - :- :-.:-:---~----...,...._I·.
. .', .. ,.."....... .' ", ;:
1. At the Director's instruction, and with the concurrence

of the thenDD/P, the Office of Security developed informants in y: ':,.:.
RID to report on the activities of RID eIIfployees on whom security
questions had arisen•. This program, which included upwards a of
dozen informants at its peak, bas declined to its present level of
three, only one of whom is reporting regularly on matters of current .
intere st. ." '. , " .'. : .' . .• ". .. .
I
. .... ~ '." .
••' . . ' . • • ... • .• ~ "."J'., .. ~':. • .r"' •...• , ..
z.
The principal object of Security's interest through this .~~.··c~
J informa.nt is a fexnale who was em.ployed in RID for ,a number of "ye';'r's
.j until she resigned in 1969. Her resignation coincided with the initiation
f
of a security review her by the Office of Security, but Security does. on
not know whether the employ~~ was aware of this secur:ity review at".~
- . J, ' the time of her resignation•.. '... '. . :. . .".-.-~~., ._;':~
,I . , . ~ . ~... "- - 1" ../" ..-.:."; ::-~}~:~~ ...,~.~- ..~:: ..~;:. ,: ......
•I c._ f
. 3. Security's interest in this em..ployee, was occasioned by .

I reports that she had developed an increasing~y intiIna-te acqaaintance,:.;.~·".
:,11 with a Cuban national. Reporting by one inforxnant, who Was also>,: <;-::"
.1 being developed by the' Cuban,' suggested that the C.uban might ha.,ve::~~\:f;;:L·..
:: i ~m intelligence interest in the fem.al~.: The SaIne Wormantalso:sub"::::;':!C;:) .
..,'~.~! .~> sequently reported thatthe Cuban had nuz!n,erous other' contacts among" ,.
--;J;.;~.~.t.~.:.{..:) clerical and secretarial employees of th ; Agency•., ' •
...~ ....\.:.;: -;."., '~ ::~:; .::,:-):~. i L: .::~.~;..:;:t,~:;..': ~ :~: :~·~~·,,,g,E?i;':' _.' '.':'> :....-........-:~ . ,. "t' ~;-:' .. ·.;:~.ii:~·~·i:;;W '~.' .;. :". ~...:.!~;~·-:;.~:,';,~>:(l.~I'i::;..~· . . .- T
. ., ....., '. 4.:' Subsequent. to he~ del;artur~ frorn:--the Agei:).cy.,'·: the'~x-RID'':;'~::';~~;''':''':;

•• " ", ~ ".' ~ • ..~:.>.I, ~. , . ' . . . . . , ~ """~:l/~;:C'''-;''''';'', ~'.
':".
employee entered into a common·-law marital relationship"with the~f!:;:;~~:;-':f'~;':':'~-
'..
"
. . Cuban and jo~ned bini .a·s. partn'er in a. photographic. business. '. In' tlU:S·'~·l,;"'", ..
. capacity shes'olicited busine'ss' a'm:ongC~ employ,;es~esp·eciallY.':,~;·". ,.
. , .:.
.:those requi~ing'passportphotos,-. Recently~ she and the CUbansotighf::~;>-;.··
to employ SecuritY~5 inform~nt in. this busine~s'onapart-timeba.sis~".'::~:< .. '
...:).-
..
"-~ :"< .::'-;.
-:~"':; :.~'~.~';;\.'-'.'<'.:; ;.:'.'-.':.".:.~.~.~.-7. :·:-I:'.<
w'
:,::'." .. :.> .:,.,
. . ..~ '", :.. " .:..:~}> . . -:.,~(.....~-
. • .....
_- '" .....: .
',,' -.~ ..:-'".
-.~ ....
'. 0".""·:
. : ,-.~•<,..'•.... - .. ;:'.~.. ~.~
::. .
.... .• r~'" " ...'.. "':",-:':.:
. !:'~_"
...... ". . . -' ..... ..:..
"':': ;
~.:' . '. ~ . >.': . ~~.···/.r:·;/;~:,··~ ..~~. '. ~ ::~ ~"-'

.. ,_".. ":. w".·· 00059
• ,_ :. 'w :."'; :~,,:l":: ~ _.~ '- •. _. _- ;.. . ..,. ..
.....:.. ,:~-;: . ~ . : ,.~, <". ., . '- .... ' .
~ .. " ~.'
. '·:'-"·-r","
~ i'· -, C
", : .. ",;. -. :::" "--; . ~ . -.. ..... t: :'.:;;. ti.. A
5. Inforrnation on the background of the Cuban is fairly exl e:l1sive,
but it is inconclusive. He is known to have been a mClnber of anti-
Castro organizations in this country. There are also reports that
his D1.other was imprisoned in Cuba at one time. There are other
cpisodes in his life that suggest intelligence involvernent on his part
with SOlne hostile service, but this is not yet definitely establi.shed.
6. The Office of Security has had at tilues a second inform.ant

in t.his case. His reporting has tended to confirrn reporting by the
principal infonnant.
8. The Office of Security has been running this operation for

over two years, in an effort to obtain conclusive proof of its intelli-
gence nature. CI Staff has been kept informed.. The FBI, which
was informed of the case at an early stage, has declined to take re-
sponsibility for it, on grounds that it concerns CIA's internal security.
As a result, the Office ofSecurity has been inhibited in the actions
it can take against the Cuban suspect. On the other hand, Security
has not taken any action against Agency employees for fear of com-
p;romising the operation.
9. It would appear to me that the Office of Security has dallied

with this case long enough. Apparently unable through positive measures
to resolve doubts about the case, O/S has followed the course of watch-
ful waiting, hoping the Cuban would take precipitatf action himself that
would give us the evidence we seek. In the meantime, our knowledge
of the relationship between the Cuban and the several other current
Agency employees with whom he is known to have contact continues
- 2 -
00060
~
:- .. -.-':
.
....
.
:.~ ...;
.~
• f
\ .
The possibility tnat the employee m -gff-Uivlslon may be passmg

information on CIA I s Soviet operations is too gr eat to war rant further
delay in moving against her. I I
- 3 -
.y;/. .
.:.
\..
:---~
.'.
_ ...
.
0006.1
'I ··.yi 7 (3
L/,.i
l~emora;}dum to: The Inspector r,ensral
Subject: Offj.ce of S'3curity Survey - Office of Security Support to i)\!DD
1. In D.:o<..:ember 1970 R.obert Ingersoll, head of the Bureau of ~Jar

cotics and Dangerous Dru§:":s, asked Hr. Helms it the Agency could give
him scime assistance in shoring up the internal integrity of the mJDD.
According to Ingersoll, the old Federal Bureau of Narcotics had been
heavily infiltrated by dishc.nest and corrupt elements, ,.;ho were believed
to have ties with the narcotics smuggling industry. Ingersoll wanted us
to h~lp him recruit some thoroughly reliable people who could be used,
not only as special agents in his various offices arolmd the country,
but also to serve as informants on the other BNDD employees in these
offices.
62
'--J
I
.// ~
.,
JOLawrence
\".
00063
r'
· 1i \1 r ,J -
'0 iHitLASSI rI to
------ [~J vnt~"L\
. __.._--_. . -,-",_. _._.,..
~_ ~.~. __ .. _-------_... ....---_. __ ..-.....- .._--
..
[J COL [qJHL~L
_ __ . ._----~-~.
0 SEU;ET
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
1---------_._-----_. -----.------ - - - - - - - - - -------- ----------.----
SUBJECT, (Optional)
--------._---_ .. -----_._--_. -- ......._--------- --------- -_._...

FROM:
_-- ..- - - _.. - --- -----_ ....... _-_._----_ ... _-------------------_ .._-
EXTENSION NO.
Howard J. Osborn
Director of Security DATE
1---------------.. --1 ~--.------ I L 9 ~1a y _19__7._3 ~_

TO: (Officer d.,ignation. room number, and DATE
building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 ,how from whom
1-----.-,------1 INITIALS to whom. Draw a tine OUOH column ofter each comment.)
RECEIVED fORWARDED
1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - - - - + - - - + - - - - - - - j - - - - - - - - . - -.... -----...- - - - - - - - - - - I
1. Deputy Director for
Management & Service c
---·----------------f----I---'-,,-------r'
2.
.- - - ----.--------------.----1---.-+-- -~---+-------
.t. t-' I
S.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
1S. 00064
ADMIN -
~
FORM
3-62 61 0 US~Dr~~~~US D SECRET D CONFIDENTIAL Al
E ONLY D UNCLASSIFIED
. ' .'
•.. .,.' .:' Li'.. ,"

,)"':.1-._ ...... .;1.:...
, .
,~ .....
(i:""~~: L.
i"."'.'
9 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management &Services

SUBJECT Press Allegations re Use of Agency
Polygraph
1. This memorandum is for your information only

and confirms a report I made to you by telephone earlier
today.
2. On 22 July 1971, an article was carried on
American proposals relative to the SALT talks in The New
York Times over the by-line of William Beecher. It was
devastatingly accurate and contained direct quotes from
a Presidential advisory memorandum the White House had
sent to Mr. Gerard Smith, Director, Arms Control and
Disarmament Agency, a few days earlier. The President
was alleged to be furiou~ with this unauthorized dis-
closure of classified information and directed a. sweeping
investigation within the United States Government to
determine the source of the disclosure. Investigation
"
'. , was conducted under the dir,ec:t4on'Q:~. Mr. Egi1 Krogh and
Mr. David Young, Staff AssistaIif~ to Mr. John Ehr1ichman,
Counsel to the President for Domestic Affairs.
3. On the basis of investigations conducted by
State Security and Defense officials, four individuals--
one individual in the Department of Defense and three
individuals in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency--
were tabbed as leading suspects. Mr. Egi1 Krogh contacted
me on 26 July 1971 and requested that we arrange to polygraph
the three suspects in the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency
and volunteered the information that the Federal Bureau of
Investigation would be asked to polygraph the one suspect
in the Department of Defense.
OD065
11 rr r', " .... -
/itJii-;;i:{ t~ t ;Ut f;J:, -: :
r • .,. ..• ~. ~ .
L"":'_. _~."-!'i~~1 1
4. I informed Mr. Krogh that from time to time

in matters involving the national security the Agency had
detailed to Mr. G. Marvin Gentile, Director of State
Security, a polygraph operator and a polygraph machine for
his use in polygraphing State Department employees who
were recipients of allegations concerning their loyalty.
I emphasized that this procedure had the Director's
approval and that State clearly understood that the examin-
ation was their total responsibility. I further informed
him that this was the only way we could undertake to enter-
tain his request and that even then it would require the
specific approval of the Director. Mr. Krogh asked me to
obtain such approval and work out such arrangements with
Mr. Gentile.
S. Later that same day, Mr. Krogh called Mr. Gentile
and inquired as to whether the arrangements had been made.
Mr. Gentile indicated they had and suggested that the same
polygraph operator be used to examine the Defense suspect.
Mr. Krogh informed Mr. Gentile that he considered this an
excellent idea and that he would instruct Defense officials
to make their man available to Mr. Gentile for a polygraph
examination.
6 The four individuals were\
\The polygraph
...a"'.'t="'1:;-0"'n=s----:;;r;-;:e"'s..u~11r:l:l="'e;::;:-'a:;:r--:;-1';;n""--;:c"i"e"'a"'r"-1"'n=g----"'l:""rl1"'e........,I"'o""u~r
L.......r;e:'Ux:r;a~m:;-:;1.-:;n men and th e
results of the examinations were forwarded over my signature
to Mr. Gentile on 29 July 1971. A copy of my covering
memorandum is attached.
7. Mr. Murrey Marder, a staff writer for The
Washington Post, in an article dated 3 September 1'9IT,
stated that a State Department spokesman had acknowledged
at a news briefing that agents of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation had polygraphed State Department employees
suspected of leaking information on the SALT talks in
July. Mr. John Edgar Hoover, then Director of the Federal
2
..
... .,- . (
Bureau of Investigation, denied this allegation in a

letter to The Washin&.!o~ Post and said that the polygraph
examinations had been conducted by another agency. Specu-
lation centered around the Agency, but after a day or so,
press speculation in this regard died away.
8. Mr. Marder apparently has never been satisfied
and has been pressing Mr. Charles Bray, State Department
spokesman, for confirmation of Agency involvement. Mr.
Bray learned today that Mr. Marder plans to use a press
conference to be held at 2:00 p.m. this afternoon to press
this point further. Mr. Bray has been given guidance by
Mr. Gentile to avoid confirmation but if this is impossible
he will indicate the examinations were conducted by State
Department Security officials utilizing an operator and
a machine detailed to the Department for this purpose. I
do not know whether or not the fact that the government-wide
investigation was directed by Mr. Egil Krogh is known to
Mr. Marder but I suspect that it is and that this is the
reason why the matter has been raised again. Mr. David
Young was instrumental in pushing my office to conduct an
internal Agency investigation of this disclosure and the
White House was satisfied that no Agency employee was
the source.
Attachment
00067
- .,,!~
., 11 ........
\
1
t --.";-
Il .
'. It •
......
00068
... _. .
~ ".
.'
.,
. :.
.'
.'
- ...
~
."': .....
.~.3 T.; .G J .r: .: .r
. ,.
l,n V"::1 1 ~/! ",:2 ~5
i:7':'j?~~::.-ati -,.~ ;~0 :r ~.f~r~D..;::~~ be .:lJ.ad.~ t() ·c:'J.l:3 h·\:1:~::.lc:r1,;: ;:l:.'-:')1··:".~T::1:~·~t ~:J.
~:},e3.~ a,cti.:;n:.;,
.;. - .. ~; - ........
~ .:: ',:: :.,- .. : . 7
..• ' •. _ .J. ,.
00069
:.. . ;y
I·
L ..." J
5 June 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Inspector General
SUBJECT Items in John Clarke MernoranduITl

to the Director of Central Intelligence,
dated 9 May 1973
1. Two items in the attached memorandun'l had not

previously been reported. The first: "-- Use of CIA funds
and facilities to for FBI and pro-
vision of technica equlpmen s for use
against a
2. In a follow-up meeting with Mr. Clarke, he advised

that involved here was the use of funds appropriatedfor CIA
be in iven to the FBI in cashiers checks for the ur ose of
There was also

gency help given in Further, other
CIA mon° s in cashiers checks were given to NSA who, with
some assistance, was working on I
L,-
Mr. Clarke said he thouL,;g"'h'""t,..".th=e----;<o-;;;n:TI-;-,y;--;:::p:-:;:r;-;o""'bklr;e~m=--
---J
here was in the use of funds, not in the ope rat ion. He thought
the only source of additional information on this subject was
Mr.1 lof the DDO!CI Staff.
3. The second item: "_- Use of CIA funds to help

State Department defer Presidential representational expenses
of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia. II
4. Mr. Clarke said the total amount of money requested

by State Department was $3, 000, 000 but that the Director would
not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in
those instances where some operational activity was involved or
could be inferred, i. e., I
L 7
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 Mr. C lark e-w-a-s-n-o-t,----s-u-r-e-o-f-;;-:t h-e-a-m-o-u-n----:-t-o-f-;:-A..---g-e-n-c-y--
.. ·.
' ./,
• I • 1
funds used. He felt that only Colonel White could supply

adrlit.ional details. He said Senator Russell and Repre-
sentative Mahon were advised of this Agency activity but
asked not to be briefed in detail.
lnspeClor
Attachmen t
00071.
'.:,!~
~d:1
'. ',' r (.
L I •. ~-'
9 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
SUBJECT Per your instructions
1. I have no recollection of specific contacts with the

Ellsberg case, Watergate, or Young. Dick Helms' instructions
at the time regarding discussion of I-funt' s previous em.ploylnent
should be a lnatter of record.
2. Other activities of the Agency which could at some point

raise public questions should they be exposed and on which Bill
Colby is fully conversant are:
CI activity of Dick abel', DD/D.
I Ian~ I investments and

accumulation of Government capital.
Use of CIA funds and facilities to acquire U. S.

real estate for FBI and provision of technical
equipments by NSAI ?for use against
1,
Use of CIA funds to help State Department defer /.
Presidential representational expenses of L. B. J . ./'f/
trip to SEA. G
f6hn M. Clarke
'-----
0007Z
5 June 1973
SUBJECT Items in John Clarke lv1'crnorandum

to the Director of Central Intelligence,
dated 9 May 1973
1. Two items in the attached memorandum had not

previously been reported. The first: "-- Use of CIA funds
and facilities to acquire U.S. real estate for FBI and pro-
vision of technical equipments by NSAS or use r
against a 1 _
Z. In a follow-up meeting with :Mr. Clarke, he advised

that involved here was the use of funds appropriate6for CIA
bein iven to the FBI in cashiers checks {or the purpose of
\
here was also I
\ Further, other
CIA monies in cashie'--r-s-c-,h.----e-c..----s-w-e-r-e-g.. i-v-e-n
.. to NSA who, with
some ~S5istance, was working onl I
Mr. Clarke said he thought the only problem
here wastnte use of funds, not in the operat ion. He thought
the only source of additional information on this subject was
Mr. I pf the DDO/CI Staff.
3. The second item: "-- Use of CIA funds to help

State Department defer Presidential representational expenses
I- of President Lyndon B. Johnson's trip to Southeast Asia."
4. Mr. Clarke said the total amount of money requested

by State Department was $3,000,000 but that the Director would
not agree to this amount. The Director did supply funds in
those instances where some operational activity ~as involved or
could be inferred, i. e. ,I
I I
Mr. Clark-e-w-a-s-n-o-,t,-----s-u-r-e-o..,..f the amount of Agency
00073
,::_S (;", : -:".-... \{J
fund s used. He felt that only Colonel "White could supply

additional details. He said Senator Russell and Repre-
sentative Mahon \;;,'ere advised of this Agency activity but
asked not to i:,e briefed in detail.
rnspector
Attachmen t
,
I
I
I
I
I
- I
I
I
I - 2 -
00074
IJ :Ji,i::':,SSIFiED
~, '
L__J' d~~:~:ltl\ -
_~~ __ __
................ _-----_ ........ ....... ...... _--_. __ ..... ......._.. _"..... -"'-'---'--- .- ........ -...... ,,_ ........
LJ.......__(UN
_~ ...... _- .
I;~i·.~!f;.l!~
.... ..
-
.~- L.U
..-- . --_....•.-.._..... _.-.._-_
....
ROUTlf'>!G AND RECORD SHEET

_._-------_._--------------_ .._------'-,------_._------------_._----
SUBJECT: (Optional)
- "OM,·---~~~~~i-~; ~~ii~~~;c~- - -- "I'i~,;QN~:, .~=--=--: ._u .:. ---:-:=:- =

_____.__________
TO: (Officer de,ign"l;on, loom number, and
building)
I--_· - -_·
DATE
__
OFfICER·S
INITIALS
7 M.9L=1=.9..;...7=.3
COMMENTS (Number eoch comment to ,I.ow from whom
to whom. Draw a line across c?lurnn offer each comment.)
-t
~--i
I, Deputy Director for
Manaaement & Services
THe-a-dquarters'---· -- -~--
l -'1'---
"~"'.w."'" ---1------ ---------.-------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- ----,------1
3.
4. Director of Central Intel ligenc e

I Headquarte rs
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. ~.
13.
14.
..-.: .... . .~ :
'.,0."
15.
00075_·.,~,
fOR" !'\'l'
, ~\.lG <;4
j
'..
0"( MAY 1973

VIA Deputy Director for Management and Services
FROM Director of Finance
SUBJECT Special Other Government Agency Activities
1. 1 IColonel White, Executive Director-
2.
3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and non-

reimbursable agreements with the White House, Department of
Justice, Defense Agencies, etc., based on signed memoranda
between the Director of Personnel and the various Agencies.
4. pro~ect TWOFOLD - Reimbursement from Bureau of
Narcotics an Dangerous Drugs for training of BNDD agents by
a domestic Agency Security proprietary.
s. I
_I]
00077
· ~
- 2 -
SUBJECT: Special Other Government Agency Activities
6. Payment to White House - Reimbursement to White

House as approved by Executive Director-Comptroller for
$33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and
addressing of replies to letters and telegrams received
by the White House as a result of the President's speech
on Cambodia in May 1970.
Ie
inance
00078
," ..
~ . ~ . ~
1 . ,II
o"l MAY i373
:0:."
.
. ~mj·!OIlA.\iDm·I FOR: Director of Ce:1tr:tl Intclli;cncc
VIA •• Deputy Director for ~fu~a&e~ont and - '. ~
.:' ~ ~.: .
. ....
F~O:f : Dircctor of rin~nco
: .Spcci~.l '\'l"~~-V
• .. ~-· ... - i
Colonel
r"l· _~
.: i . 1.
t··h A
..
...L", ....
: •• _ ,-u
_ t 1- '\.
':,-._ .. ~
_ Ji:~ctor-
'
.......
......
<,
............
.. . : '
.~~:.:~;::~.
;~~}~
.: .. '
,
,
.. , .
. ~3. Dctailecs -Tho Agency has reimbursable and non~

reimbtirsal.>lc a::;rcc:nents \il t!l the j'lhitc !:ouse t D~~Hlrt;:lCnt of
Justice, ~~£cnsc A~encics, etc. t bas·~d on s i~~~lCJ r.1~:.:oranJa
between the Director of Personnel and the various Ag~ncies.
4. Proj oct :r~JFOL!) - Reimbursei'Jent fron Burc:lu of'.
Nar.cotics an1 iJallJerous jjr:.Igs for traini:lg of E:miJ a'gents by
a do~cstic A~ency Security'proprietary~ .. "1,0;.,.
:::~·;o~:· .
s.
"
,
".:0,
-L- _
. - ---- ._. _--_ . - ...........
------. --.- •. _---- ---,-----_. -----_.._. ------,. -- .. -
.' ,
. .. - _ '--,.._
"
. ••
Fr--'.,:,
#."
,r:'7"J:' ,
- 2 -
SUBJECT: Special Other Government Agoncy Activities
6. Payment to White House - ReimbursC;;lCllt to Hhite

House as approved"DY Executive Di rcctor- COJ:1ptToller for
$33 t 655.68 representing cost of postage, stationeTy and
addressing of replies to letters and telegrams received
by the White House as a result of the President's speech
on Call~bodia in May 1970.
(signed) Thomas B. Yale

Thoriias B. Yale
Director of Finance
-.
00080
- ,I
, ,
, .', i
-
'j
07 MAY 1973
~1EJ.:C)R.A"IDu},1 FOR: Director of Central Intolligence

VIA Dcpu ty Di rec tor for Hit;') :lgemcn t and S~ rvices
FiW:.I Director of rin3~ce
SUDJLCT Special Other COVCrnIi1ent A£cncy Activities
Colonel L'hi te, Lxecutive Director-
~---
2. I
- 3. Detailees - The Agency has reimbursable and non-
reimbursable agreements wi til the 11hi to House, Department of
Justice, Defense Agcnci~s, etc., based dn signed memoranda
between the Director of'Personnel and the various ~gencies.
4. proiect TWOFOLD - Reimbursement from Bureau of
Narcotics an Dangerous Drugs for training of BNDD agents by
a domestic Agency Security proprietary.
s. I
00081
.. '
·2-
SUB~TECT: Special Other Governr;)ent Agency Activities
6. Payn~.~! to White H~ - Reinbursci:lc,nt to i'illite

Jiouse as approved Ly Execut~ve Director-CoJ:1ptro11cr for
$33,655.68 representing cost of postage, stationery and
a,1drcssing of replies to letters ~nd telegrams received
by the White iIouse as a result of the President's speech
on Canbodia in t.lay 1970.
(signed) Thomas B. Yale

Th01:1as B. Yale
Director of Finance
,,
00082
[~r' .U~~lA·,SSIFIED . 0 ~~~~~\~. . . [J CONFI' 'HLU ~~r 'LET
,........:-..-_._------- ._--_.~-_.- ------_._-. ---.' ------_._...... _--- .... .. -.;::~
I' ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET
f-----.:.!.-.---.------__ - - -...-.-----.. -----~--- .. - -..- -
SUBJECT: (Optional)
FROM:
_._---_ _ --- _---- ..- __ - --_.. _--~-_._----.[_
EXTEN510N
..
NO.
_ _-_._----_ .._.._
.. __ - -._._ .._--_
~~l~tke~i~~~~~In~f Finance I II·OATi----..----·--··:-..---------~-- . -----..-

24 May 1973.
f -- -:-(-Offi-lC-er-de-Sig-n-at-;on-.-r-oo-m-n-lJ-mb'~;:-~ndl---·---;~-TE-------j--'-----+----_":-_'----------
TO
building) _.___ OffICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
INITIALS 10 whom.Draw a line across column cite, each comment.)
j
_ ~.O fORWARDED
----.-t---.-;:±===.--- .-~....:.---------_.---
.. ~ IHeadquL.ter~ .
-
--+-_ _
1
:1-......JAttached are pertinent
2
1 __ .- - - - - - - - -..-
3.
.....-.-- .--J---+-------l documents and papers
to Para 6 of the Director of
relatin~
Finance's memo to the DCI

.c.
dated 7 May 1973, Subject:
s. tlSpecial Other Government
6.
Agency Activities"
~.......----I
7.
8.
Warren D. MagnussoI
9. Atts
10.
11.
, 12.
j
i
1 13.
~.
r ...~ : .
!
u. . .
I
. ' ... '." :..; .... :'. .:--, ."
'. -:. ;.:-.. ".. '" .;. <';" .. " .. ' ..;.
l.,<~"'~:~:~~_~~-~:c. ~.~:~11~~~~.~Ji:o~~:.: . ~.;,~~~~~~~

'.' . /
/
l/jr. l·lagnusson's phone conve:csation ''lith ;.~r. John BroWn at approximately lO:20
on 26 May 19'10:
B: Guess we're back together again~
M: Got more problems?
B: Yes, don't know how much Watts told you.
M: I diw1't talk to Watts. Think he called Colonel vmite.
B: Let me explain backg:cound. As a result of the C8'"!!lbodia speech, we're

getting relatively inundated with correspondence and norlnally all of
this is sent to the Department of state for ans\'lering. vJhat \'Ie 're
doing -- we're continuing to send all cons correspondence to State.
Hm'lever, the President made deteriy;il1~tion--he' d.--]-i}r:~-to----a:~~sv~~i:-~~.lpi~-;-;:t
over his signature here and we asked the Department of State to
support us on this effort. They're in a position vn1ere they can provide
only limited support at this time. Th~ committed for $10,000 \'Ihich
would probably handle in the area of maybe bC),OOo responses.... .. _-
"
-.
M: How many responses altogether counting pros and cons?
B: The cons are quite a large group that they're handling themselves also.
M: Are they going to be handling pros too?
B: ...,>-$lOJ.9-£OisJo!..J?ros. They're doing cons. On pros they can pick up only

$10, OOOW'Ortli.:-we-estimate it will be arounct..$§.".9_00 .~.!_l.2..L~T}d it
looks like at present time we've got over 100,000 responses in and it
could go upwards of 150,000 or greater. Looks like \'Ie'll need a minimum
of another $lO;OOO:J?iCiEra~oJ.:y-inare-aof$15,0002 additional. This covers
cost of pri"il-Eing, postage and addressing:'
M: Just printing, postage and addressing? Not any overtime for any salaries
or anything like that?
B: No, the posting of the things we'll do ourselves -- by hand. No problem.

We're talking about physical costs of job -- cost of stamps, cost of
envelopes and cards, and cost of having them addressed by outside firm.
We'll handle putting sta~ on, inserting, and sealing and mailing. Only
talking about cost associated with three aspects of the operation.
M: Postage, addressing and printing.

C
B: Yes, reason I asked NS~ to see if they could arrange -- depending on
how volume goes -- probably another ~10,000 to g,5,000.__
M: These are just pros? State is handling all cons themselves?
(continued)
00084
I 4 -,
,
·
"
,.
Messrs. Ma.gnusson and Bl'Oim (continued - Page 2)
B: Yes, this is just portion of pyas we're ta.1king about. My understand.ing

Get in t01..Jch ·t.'i. th you to work out mecha11ics of how we would. 11<Lndle the
bi lling to make sure it's straight and we do it l1roperly so it fits in
with your accounting system.
M: This is only portion of pros. state doing some too?
B: TheY~'.LLc..ill)1ribut:i.JlKJ110.000 to the pros as well as doing all the__c.illiS.

They're picking up quite a load as a l-::CSuit oftiiTs:-OneTieJi of a lot
of response coming in on this.
M: Bound to be. Tell you, John, let me give you a call back later today
if I may. Have to take a look about where I would fit this stuff in.
!u'e you going to be in this afternoon?
B: I'll be around. If I'm not in my office I'll get back to you as soon
as I come back.
M: I'll give you a call then.
B: Can't be real definite -- not sure how we're going to peak out. Not
sure what backlog is. I'll check into that so when we talk this
afternoon I can be little more definite. Probably run into that area,
I think.
M: Okay, 1 1 11 get back in touch with you.
B: Okay, thank you, Warren.
End of Conversation
00085
Mr. Magnusson's phone convel"sation with Col. Hhite at 15:40 on 26 Iv;ay 1970:
M: I talked 'nth John Brown today and it seems like -- as ;you mentioned --
as a result of CC-wTloodia, inquiries going into 1\11i te House. The State
Department is doing all the work on the cons -- there are pros and cons.
The State Department is going to answer all the cons and the President has
determined that he wants to anSi-ler persona.lly all the pros. However, the
state has agreed to pick up some of those too in the aInount of $10,000.
That will cover maybe 60,000 of the ans-wers. They estimate there 1 s going
to be from 100,000 to 150,000 answers that will have to be put out by
the Hhite House. Estimate it's going to cost about $8,000 per 50,000.
Think it might go to 150,000. $10,000 to $15,000 additional which the
White House will have to pay for. The charges are only going to be for
printing, postage and addressing by an outside firm. No salaries for
overtime or anything like that. They're going to lick the stamps in the
\<i'hi te House, paste the stamps on and insert the message into the envelopes.
John Brm-ffi said he had requested NSC to see if they could arrange,
presUD1ably with us, I guess, for another $10,000 to $15,000 depending on
volume. He was talking as more or less foregone conclusion we would do
it. I made no commitment. Told him I'd look into it.
W: How would we do this?
M: We would do it by asking them to pay amount and tl1en send over 1080
to us with bill for the postage, bill for the addressing of the envelopes
and bill for the printing accompanying this and we would just send check
back. They would send short memorandum with it certifying these are the
charges. '
W: I think we want to know what we spend our money for but I don't think we
want the public records to' show that we paid for it.
M: What we can do, Sir -- I can ask them to send over a 1080 with certifica-
tion that these are the charges for classified services per our conversation,
and if you're willing to take that we can certainly do it that way.
W: Will this be an outside firm? Couldn't we just pay the firm? What would
,be better? I'm not sure.
M: I think a short memo just saying attached 1080 is for charges previously
agreed to between this Agency and themselves and that's all and then we
send them check for that. Otherwise, there's always chance that an outside
firm might realize it was us paying for it.,
W: I guess it's the best way to do it. I'd like to have in our records --
nobody else has access to -- exactly what it was for -- all about it;
their records, which are audited by the General Accounting Office, as
little as possible.
(continued)
00086
.'
Mr. l'1agnusson and Col. vlhite (continued - Page 2)
M: Think I can talk to them and an:ange that so he just sends unclassified
1080.
W: Go a.head and do it. I'll have to sign off on it, I suppose. You go
ahead and a.rrange it in way that will give us full record. As far as
any records of their IS a:ce concerned, I would prefer to have minim'lun.
M: I can write memo and John Bro-wn ca.n l'efer to this and our phone conversa-
tion in a memo accompanying the 1080.
W: Okay, go ahead and do it. Put limit on it. h'hen they talked to we they
said $10,000.
M: He said $10,000 to $15,000 because t:ney're just p011ring in. Might run
above $10,000.
W: Approximately $10,000 but in no case will it exceed $15,000 -- something

like that. Okay.
M: All right, Sir.
W: Thank you, Warren.
End of Conversation
.. ,
1; i .
00087
;
"
" • .: ,.J
gr. 1'-1agnusson' s phone conversation with Kr. John Brmm at appl'oxin13.te1y 1'7: 00
on 26 May 1970:
M: Think we can go aJ.1ead and do this. Have' to be caref\ll as to way this

is doc'urnented -- that's the only thing. \iould like to suggest that I
,,,rite memo for the record -- kind of co-sign it -- agreeing to wnount
and so forth and the way we do this. If,emo would have in it what it's
for and then you ,",ould send us a 1080 for this, referencing this ITlE~mo
an~ our conversation.
B: You're thinking in t0rJllS of :cell(joursing us again? \';ouldn' t it be

better for us to have direct cha.:cge to you?
M: No, because of public record. In order to have all the things in our
hands. It wouldn't look good for us to pay the bills direct for this
sort of thing.
B: It would not?
M: No, if you people pay the bills •••••
B: (interrupting) Even to pay a large postage fee? Bulk of expense will

be postage.
M: But we have to document what it's for - - if you people can just pay it,
then we'll give you money for it.
B: What would our memo say?
M: Say attached is 1080 referencing memo dated such and such.
B: 'What does the memo say -- that we're making reference to?
M: I III write that up and bring over to you.
B: What, basically, are we going to say it's about?
M: ,Have $10,000 with limit of $15,000 and would be for printing of these
things and so on.
B: Just wondering if you have direct billing it seems to me that serves

purpose of memorandum.
M: The direct billing from, let's say, the printer, the addressograph
company or something like that, to us might raise questions outside
and I think powers that be don't want to have fact that we're paying
for this sort of thing anyplace where it can be dug up. Easiest and
cleanest way to do this is you people go ahead and pay and we'll
reimburse you immediately.
B: Do we have to have this memo?
_ .• ' _ w, ..... ~
(continued) i'
f ~', '
- I j
: \;',
, ,
• ~I
00088
\..- - .... _J L
., ,
Messrs. l,~agnusson and Brown (continued - Page 2)
M: I'd keep in rr~ safe here.
B: Houldn' t i t be a.dec.. \~ate to send 1080?
M: Don't forget, you people keep copies of 1080's -- you have to by

law. 1080 would have to cite 'what billing is for beca.use of that,
then that would open up to GAO or somebody else as to who's paying
for this sort of thing.
B: \'le have to cite what it's for?
M: Let I s say it' s "XYZ Printing CompanyU and you pay bill. This looks
like you're paying it. You send us 1080 which says nothing and we
give you money for this. He ourselves have to have on our i.'ecords
what we're paying for for our o\VTI ~uditors which doesn't get outside
of our Agency.
B: It's for your internal auditors? It would not get outside? Okay,
that sounds all right.
M: 1 1 11 draw the memo up and bring it over there and you can see it.
B: That sounds good, Warren.
M: Would next Monday be all right with that memo?
B: Yes, we'll go ahead and order.
M: You can get going and so on.
B: Don't know what final cost is going to be. Hate to restrict ourselves.
We figure total cost is going to be around $25,000. Got over 100,000
already that are just pro. 200,000 that haven't been analyzed yet.
Of 200,000 they estimate possibly upwards of 50,000 or 60,000 could
pertain to Cambodia. Of the backlog of 200,000, 60,000 could be of
,type that will be answered in this mailing. Our best estimate would
be it may run over.
M: I've got instructions, John, to indicate in memo that it's for

approximately $10,000 but not to exceed $15,000. If and when it
exceeds $15,000, we'll start over again and I'll inquire further as
to whether we can cover the other -- okay?
B: Okay.
M: Open to negotiation if it runs higher.
(continued)
r'-- .-" ,-' .. - ...... _ ,._
I ..
Is \ 00089
L:J L .'.. '_,'
.~
Messrs. jvjagnusson and Brown (continued - Page 3)
B: It rrlay n.m hig11er. If 60,000 letters come out being pro, wUl tai~e
us to ~;26, 000 or sorr.ewhere in tl1at vicinity.
M: Then I I d have to go back and inquire to see if powers that be will

cover the other part. I think it I S best to waitt til that ha?pens.
B: O~ay, good enough.
M: '-[nat time Monday?
B: wny don't you give us call here Monday? V~ secretary will line it up.
M: Okay.
B: Thank you, Warren.
End of Conversation
_fCO;---.....
, ,
i~:'J
~ .. __I ~
00090
WASHI"'GTON, D.C. 21)505
S JUN iS7a
M:.Sl-.10RAl'illljM FOR 'I'HE RECORD
SUB.J''&CT: Reimbursement to the h~ite House for Certain

Printing, Postage and Addressing Expenses
L Reference is made to the telephone conversation between

Mr. John Brown, Staff Secretary, Wnite House, and the undersigned
concerning the accounting and the reimbursement procedure for
\fnite House expenditu:ces in connection lirith the printing, postage
and addressing of :ceplies to certain mail addressed to the President.
2. It was estimated and agreed that these expenditures would

amount to approximately $10,000, but not exceed $15,000, and the
request for reimbursement to this Agency would be based upon receipt
of a memorandum categorizing the expenses and certifying to their
validity. The memorandum will also transmit a Standard Form 1081
and copies of the vendors' invoices where applicable.
3. Upon receipt of the a,bove memorandum, Standard Form 1081

and copies of vendors' invoices, a U. S. Government Treasury check
will be drawn and forwarded to the Wnite House.
WARREN D. ON
Deputy Director for Liai(son and Planning
Office of Finance
CONCUR:
.;
0009.1
- -
24 f.UG 1970
M8MORANDGM FOR T~~ RECORD
SUBJECT: RejJnbu:c sement to the Hhite House for Certain Printing,

Postage and Addressing Expenses
1. On 18 August 1970, the undersigned received a telepllOne call

from Mr. John Brown (145-2167) advising that the mailing had been
heavier than anticipated (increased to 250,000 pieces) and that the
dollar requirement for subj ect purpose had incl'eased from $15,000 to
$25,000.
2. I apologetically advised y~. Brown that since our records
showed that prior approval was lirrdted to $15,000 I would have to
advise and confirm with my superiors that the increase to $25,000
was acceptable, as I was sure it was.
3. In the absence of Col. Hhite (on leave), Mr. Bush irmnediately

contacted Mr. Clarke, r---1 who was not in his office. On 19 August,
Mr. Clarke telephonicaIIy-approved the increased level and y~. Brown
was duly informed.
Chief,
O~,-:- _
0009Z
THE WHITE HOUSE
V'lASHINGTON
September 10, 19'(0
Dear ]vJr. I\~gnusson:
Pursuant to your telephone call to Vir. John Brown regarding the

breakdown of costs in connection with the mailing of the Acknowledgement
Cards concerning Tne Presicient's Speech on The Situation in Southeast
Asia, the following costs were incurred:
Computer Marketing Industries, Inc. $ 12,7 46.15

Acknowledgement Cards 3,185.07
Envelopes 1,051. 20
Total - $ 16,982.42
Sincerely yours,
Carson M. Howell
Administrative Officer
Mr. Warren D. Magnusson

Deputy Director for Liaison and Planning
Office of Finance
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D. C.
00093
· ..
~
"'
"
/ ' ,
I.. ,_ / •••••
. ,.
i:C:;l':)1·'.:-·...::~::.1 ,to ·).4... t:); ~i ...:0:...-(;) (~:'·.l,.~>i 2'~ '''.U .. ~U.:. t l~/[.~JI
...
c ~-\:~l~ f;)4"~): ;;,~ct,
1. ...\t;t~~c:11C(i h.":.:):"e-Go iG [·.·.:: . ~·:n.:'.. :·:·~5.~~'"~ ;.~ll.b;.;j.it·~c{i "fj,-cr,-:. '~]il~ \;:l1-(,G 1... ·')~~~·
fOl' m~.iling C:qr.:;n;-;cs.
2. It is l"C(I1..1CS.lcc<1 t:'iJ-C ~(,11C: a::,'j_:"3:~n~l ",,"Ol'J.cllDr be:: ~c·L":·;·:.i?1:.t{,;t.~"·":~~i~i~}l.,

r'l::n'ov·::u cmel ,::o}:ctificd, n~ .'':''J t:.10 <:.v'::':i.:i..~.:1)iliJvi of i\1':;\:'O :11'1'.: rctu~';i\:il .:.,')
·~.;·;lr. OJ~.riCG ;fOl· l)C#JfjLc.. r~·t;.
u.
'1}·j·~·~ ..lit . . J 1 ~'''~ ~'J: I.:..j~f
Dc:r,u'::'y :UirC<.:'t-'Jl' fo,," IJirdLoil ::lad :;:'l: ..nlr,s

or .ricG of 1:'il1:}n:::~
11(",;10 :r~'o:'.1 r,b.'. Ibi:Gll

dt.tl 10 .Ecn'~ 1970
[,F 1081 (or'1e 011<1 2)
o~ 1(15 Sept 70)
00094
, '. ",
1 5 SiP :070
JViEMORAi\"'D"U1Y1 FOR: Dil"ector of Planning, ProgrB111m.ing and Budgeting

SUBJECT ReirnburseT~jent
to tile Villite House for Certain
l~ernorandum
for the Record, dated 24 AugLl.st 1970,
same subject
1. Attached hereto is accounting submitted from the i'lhite House

for m3.iling expenses.
2. It is requested that the original voucher be administratively

approved and certified as to the availability of fUnds and returned to
this office for payment.
HARREN D. MAGJ.lJlJSSON
Deputy Director for Liaison an lanning' . i /
Office of Finance
Attachments
Memo from Mr. Howell
dtd 10 Sept 1970
SF 1081 (orig and 2)
00095
"T
·•
~(I'lldHI\: r'fIH"r... O. lt1~l SCHeDULE

; I; \0 \U10 D,O. Sa, ..
1(',1 ·!Uj-Ia :. ~.I
, ..., l \
D .1';:''-,,,'-'S
v •, C IJ a j
nil, SQ,
[Ill. Xo.
O_;i_ii'llj.: o:':~("c)
_________
To -J b----·--------
L------,trTLITljs<!"mu:nJSmhTI'ij;;:-..orr..,IT'icrncr-moukc hi1;('d)
100
(D. O•• ,·mbo!)
PAID or
You aro nuthorized to eITect tho withc1cil\,,'l1ls l1i1d credits indicated below.
1 ~QQ _ _~ __3.0.0- _
----.('1:0>T.1.'l:. SlTiii"'&"O'lTiJir<'CCl:Ti--co"'iim"j"'Jb,"",V~
OlTTlirsi (D, 0, .,·/Dbo!)
~~:=;.-===.-=====-.=....~:-~~- =::; :::.;.::.~::=;::::~~:::''''''.:::-.::~.=:'=-:-..:;:~.::''-:-~-==--==:===:;:-:--=~-::-:-'

~·;:--:='·_·::::::':;=~-::=:=':..~-=-':=:='·.""'-='~-=:;::-=:::--:;:4:::"~7=_==~':';:_. -:.~ .':': :~... ",. :::'::-:-7:=-;
~_'_-_::.::::_-.:.'::-:-~-:-..:::._
_. '_
....,_·iyH.:lHA\'J f:lO;".'i- 11 _~~~.~'_!_~.= .. _.~ . _..._.__
DEPAHTMENT I DEPAaTl.l:ii:NT Executive Office of ti1C F,,:'csi,
D"i\EAU i Bunr.J..u The Hhite IIou::>e Oflice
II
11-Ol-00C)l
AnDRESS WashinGtoD t D. C. 20500
A;';:;;:Eo8
IlUllltAU
1- s_I_'>(_,_U_R_y--r ~~::_=:_=::_=.....,I=R=~=~L=~;='i..=~C=I=;======= '==0_=.=""s'~"=~,-,-O-=ll=I~=n~~-'====- -:'-='--.=~=,
" RXTEBEIICI ApPROPRIATION OR FUND SnlBOL A lol O\J NT I ArPROrRlnlOIl OR FUSD SnlBOL A),lOUNT
I~
1100110.001
~-----,J
TOUL TOTlL
Dctails of chargcs or refercnce t.o attachcd supporting documents

For the printing of Acknmdedgw.ent Ca.rds t Envelopes, and to ICeypW'Jch nai;iCS & aGar
and place on magnetic tape and the preparation of heat transfer labels and affixi
to envelopes, in ,connection with the acknowledging of mail concerning the Preside
speech on the Situation in Southeast Asia.
For use of office billed: For use of billing office:
I certify fl..ntls are avai lable.

L I C(-.. ,·,·~ I
L\N 1 }.ioR I vu_
I
FICATE OF OFFICE BILLED
I el!Ttiry tllat the iI.ellls listefl herein are correct a.nd proper for P't"'J.J.ll:.JJ..Lc.JLJ.lJ..LL..!<ll!l<....!!U.l!.!C~~~.!..!..I.:~~~~~:.:....---,
(Aulborizcd "dmluislrBlivc or Ccrlll)'io~ olliccn
Paid U)' ehcrk No. _ C/D Ko. .da,eQ0096
-(:: u: s. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 11161-607821

'· '"
0
.. .
" {~
1
' :
... •
.. . :•.. I
~ ,,:,
3 [\v c
v
-~')
.•
''''l~-·\
t...... '",)
l"'".... 1..,.
.: ,.,'
, . .L J I
----------
c:::--' .f·. . . i" I ,

1. l .; ~~..:
";. . . . . ": r, ~. r- '"'.-}
I.".J::. ..'1 . ' I, t. 1,./
FAH IL- _ '·C··'0

.... i '..\ Ce··,T.....,
!....
.,&. ..
I
----
3- !~ll C.OC·\:Z"~:~;-i·~~:(t·~.':·i1 cc~·:j::'::;'-:]:~.':'''l: J":.;li~ t..r·rl~;;i!C"(,:ton if; L)c:lli~~ ~"~~-'l(~
in tll is ()f fic~ fc/·,;,.. . ~~0c·...·.:::.ti .~:{ :i."C,~",,~::~1:; t:.-:-::\ iz :::~-it) i1:(':D10 to t.i"\C 1\ C '_~'1CY"
oU'.li-toro.
1.. Flc~s::l for.. .ra::-d. -t.]~,~ c}lCcl,: to th:i~ oi'fico for tl"!'.71;::d.'Gi.:-'l to l',
npp~o~~lutc cf:icial.
T;~.l\~r~ ~:,1 D. l·:.:\(rr,:u:-~(.'·(;:r

D·~.:r:lrt,;r ;:::t:tCct.-:>~ :rCJ: L~ui E:Ci', 0.;.n T·J. r--:'"nl;~ f:
00097
...
r
;
j,·:r. John 0rO\Vn

.St"ff Sc~cretal:Y
The "/Lite I-louse Office
WC:iGhingt'.n, D. C. 20500
J..-- Enclosed is U. S. Treasury CIH?ck No. 1 1 in the arnCjllT:t
No. 1-1 1 copy cnclosed./This sC!H::dule wasfonvardcd to tilis
Office by Mr. Car son lv!. Eqwcll, ACl";,ini::;tra tive Officer, on
10 September 1970.
Your s very truly,
'JAHREN D. MA USSON
De truL.y .uirector for Liai50n and PlanninG
Enclosures
OFI 11 Oct.70)
<.
THE WHITE HOUSE

\\'ASHINGTON
Deccniber 7, 1970
l'
CONFIDENTIAL
MEMORANDUM FOR: WARREN MAGNUSON
We have finally received the cost breakdown for acknowledging

the mail in connection with the President l s speech on the situation
in Southeast Asia. By copy of this Inenlorandurn I am requesting
our administrative office to forward that portion of the bill applicable
to you.
If there are any problems in handling this, please let me know.
Thank you.
.::.::rnA
JOHN R. BROWN III
cc; . Carson Howell
00099
-- - .
. ... ..
~ ~- - ._--_ .. _._. - -'-
Keypunch namcs, p1acc on magnetic tape
prepare and affix to envelopes heat
transfer labels, and furnish printout. $7,410.35
Print ackno.. : lecgment Cards 2,244.27
Print Envelopes. 728.00
Postage 6,290.64
$16,673.26
. . . . . . . . . M •• _. __ • __ • - . . . . _ _ • _ _ •• - _ ... -- • • •' . - . - - . - . . . ------.~-

... - - - - • •_ - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - . . . - - - - - • • •- •• -
--
/
.;
,....
Director of Planning, Frogramming and Budgeting
SliBJECT Reimburseraent to the wnite House for Certain

REYiRENCE Memo:cP.ndum for the Record, dated 24 August 1970,

same subj ect
1. Attached hereto is the second accounting, in the amount of

$16,673.26, submitted from the vtnite House for mailing expenses.
Cijeck for the fir st accounting in the 8~nount of $16,982.42 was
forwm'ded to the White House on 2 October 1970.
2. It is requested that the original voucher be administratively

approved and certified as to the availability of funds and returned ~o
this office for payment.
GI"r
Deputy Director for Liaison n' Planning
Office of Finance
Attachments
SF 1081 (orig & 2 wiatt)
Memo from the White House
dated 7 Dec 1970
Memo to D/pPB, transmitting
. 1st accounting, dated 15 Sept 70
Copy of 1st 1081
Memo from the White House
dated 10 Sept 70
Memo for the Record dated 24 Aug 70
.~
001.0.1.
I
.-I
.....1' I' 1"'11;" .'\0. IUhl
I ,.'~ll .11)0 D. O. No. _
IlHI-I(II-18
fill, No. _._~ -_.~():-::f·

- ._._---
.. bi~I!.:-;·l-)-·
~; -"'}~
Du. No. - -~------ - ._--
(iJ.l;:i1t: (,J~;) .._-
--_._---
__30~~ "7"" _
PAm Dr
(D. O. 'j"ubol)
You urc ii.uthorized to (·{Teet tho withcbl\vl1ls llnd cr0dits inJicnted below.
----~ OIUCC~-------
(D1s(lurslug oliJccr
'-0' 1 ... .L~)~n.....

··r·C'·'·l·,...··"·Ofl
. 1 ....
(>111,n.
ro
~ ..
L .,
Dr.rh1ITAlENT
li-01-0~)01
Arlj)H~f)S
1110110 0 001
TOT.l.L
Details of charges or reference to attached supporting documents

For the printing of Acknol-l1ecigement C2l'iS, Envelppes and Po.staGe for ]wiil:in;-;,
<tnd to Keypunch names, ?lace on mac:c.etic taoe, prepare and afi.'ix to envo:;'.')cs
heat transfer lab~1s, and furnish printout,9 in connection ,vi th theacknollled':c.~~;·J,'.
of mail concerning the Preside:1t 1 s Second speech on the Situatton in ::;ou'c,l-jeast ;.,h
See attached list for breakdo~~ of cos~s~
For usc of office billed: For usc of billing office:

I "1- ~ r.".'
"- .. ".1 J funds ill~C l.iV.J. i 1..1 bl:~.
. I I '\'('''''',1
~ j,Jh, I CU;)E I
- BILI~EJ)
PERTIFICATE OF OFFICE
I ccrtify that the iI.cllls listed herein are correct and proper for payment from the appropriation's) designated.
1,- ,
Cllnle)
/Cf,(
~ I" -YiU~-'o/l-jt'C1'--
Paid by chcck No. _ C/D No. , dated 001.02

_
* u. S, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: Ig61-607B21

"
,,
,.
;
, .,
1. It Ie; 1"CqtJ'::~:"~(:~ ~:1;:·;.t (} cl:.cc:~ .~:.~ ~b.:~ ;~,r.:10\lr.lt tJj" ~)lu, 673.26 "uc
(Ir~\·;n ~::iy~blc to t11(~ ".r:t:C~~Z.. Ul"C~: of. t~lC t":::iltccl St;:tCG.
CuJCI _
3• .1\11 {loc~:1"J.\,,;r~t2.·~ic·r: CG~lccA:t;-:i: ..,~; ~~:ji:, '(;;;,::lj::.;:ctic.r:a iG l;c:;., .. ~ ~:I:'I" :':-t
t:l1is office ;£01· seCtl:..: it.j ;:'<22::C:10 <.:.:-.. (~ is a:,..\.'~til~bl(~ to tl)12 /\:.;'.:....,jlC~r ;ll:'.. ::-!J:~.~.
4. 1='lcaoe ;or'l\;/~l"d t;~{j c~-i.ccl·:~ \0 ·...::i:3 oi£ice for trv;l.Gn1i~ir.~1 t ( j '~Lt

ap;Jl'opric1tc o"::;ici<::.l.
~ 1\ h 1\):- 1',"-.u. ..v,..... '-I:.•

;;::'ClJu':Y .L il'ector {or Liai:hj~i •. :tJ'~ ••.
00103
·"
,
~·~-T·
l. --.-~
M 1'. J 0 h n .R. D 1" I) W n III

.51.:,.£[ S . . crctary
The \Vhitc I-louse Office
W ... shington, D. C. 20500
. Enclosed is U. S 'fJ:'easury Check No.IL- lin ~he

a.mount of $16,673.26 \\'hich l'epreccnts reirnhursemcfit of J3\ln~;).u
Schedule No. c=JCOl)Y enclosed.
Yours very truly,

1
....
D)( Director for Liaison i.md PI :nnin,
Office of Fin,IDce
Enclosures .
OF
,.. _
.....
00104
/ ... , ........
..\- .
'.:
~' ..
!lo.. ..:.'
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management and Services

SUBJECT Special Report
1. This memorandum is in response to a request to

provide information on situations or associations that
might appear to be irregular on the surface.
2. Details to the White House and Government Agencies -
Background-:--For ]113ny years the Central Infe-IIlgc;i1ce Agc-nc·y--has
detailed employees to the immediate office of the White House
per se and to components associated intimately with the immediate
office of the President such as the Council on International
Economic Policy and the President's Foreign Intelligence
Advisory Board. We have furnished secretaries, clerical
employees and certain professional employees on a reimbursable
and non-reimbursable basis. At the present time, we have no
clericals or professionals assigned to the immediate White
House office, but we do have one young man detailed to their
Communications Section. There are detailees to PFIAB and CIEP.
I might point out that we had detailed to the White House as
late as the fall of 1970 couriers, telephone operators, a
laborer assigned to the grounds and a graphics man who designed
invitations for State dinners. By October of 1970, more funds
were apparently available to run the White House and most of
our detailees were hired as bona fide White House employees.
CIA is not the only Agency furnishing the White House with
detailees. Levies have been made by this Administration and
others on Defense and State and other Government entities
whose employees have Top Secret clearances.
Professional officers have been and are at the present
time assignedm the National Security Council and we have seven
clericals on detail to NSC on a reimbursable basis.
In addition to the above, we have technical specialists
detailed to NSA, an instructor at the National War College and
security officers detailed to the Department of State to
001.05 '
protect foreign visitors. Recently, I lwas detailed
to the Secretary of the Treasury alorig wIth 10 l' other Agency
employees. We have even, in rare instances, detailed our
people to Congressional Staffs for short periods of time.
3. Details to the White House and Government Agencies -
Discussion: Details to NSC, the White-House, N.S1\. and fhe
National War College are probably qu~te defensible. On the other
hand, there may be those who would question Agency employees
currently working at the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs
and Mr. Peter Peterson having an Agency employee as his
secretary when he was the Secretary of Commerce (she also made
a trip with him to Moscow). She is still with him in his
present assignment but we expect that she will report to NSC for
a new detail sometime this month. ~ I served for
over ten years as Director of thefflce of PublIC Safety for
AID. This information has been kept "close to the vest" during
that entire period of time. He has been approved for disability
retirement and is presently on sick leave and will retire
automatically at the expiration of this leave.
Each detail of an Agency employee to the White House or
other Government agency has been carefully considered and
approval at a higher level obtained when professionals were
involved.
4. Project TWOFOLD: I believe the support we are
providing to Project TWOFOLD is an activity that should be
reported under your guidelines. Since this is an extremely
sensitive Project and the Office of Security is reporting on
it, I will not repeat the details in my memorandum.
5. Individuals Engaged in Domestic Activities: In a more
general sense, Contract Personnel Division prepares and executes
contracts with individuals engaged by the Agency to carry out
domestic activities. We also process Staff Agents who are
domestically assigned. None of these assignments are decided
in OP. I really have no way of knowing with any degree of
certainty what the specific duties of these individuals will be.
6. I
001.06
~\L
7. I I
8. Hunt Requests a Lockpicker: This is a record of

External Employment Assistance Branch's action on a request
from Howard Hunt for a lockpicker who might be retiring or
resigning from the Agency.
Sometime in the spring of 1972, Frank O'Malley of EEAB
received a call from Howard Hunt who asked Frank if he had a
retiree or resignee who was accomplished at picking locks.
Mr. O'Malley sent him a resume on Thomas Amato who retired
31 July 1971. Mr. O'Malley did not document his EEAB record
to show the date of this e~change, but I Kwho
also works in EEAB) opines that it occurred sometlme between
March and May 1972.
All of the above information was reported to the Office
of Security on 4 October 1972 following the FBI's contact with
the Agency regarding Howard Hunt.
9. Resume Sent to McCord: I ~ contract
employee who retired in September 1971, was a c~ient of the
after retirement. One of the leads given tol r
External Employment Assistance Branch in his search for a job
as
James McCord's security business. EEAB sent a lesume to
McCord, but I Iwas not hired.
In mid-summer 1972, r ~telePhoned EEAB from
Chicago. (He had a job there Wl til t e Hal ifax Security Co.,
a lead provided by EEAB, but until this telephone call he had
00107
...'
not notified EEAB that he had the job and had moved from
the D.C. area.) He said he had been. visited by a Special
Agent of the FBI who told I ~hat his resume had been
found among McCord's papers. Ine Agent wanted to know if
I ~ad any connection with McCord. I ~xplained
how the resume got to McCord. After the Agent left him,
I ~e l~pl:one~ EEA~. I lof OP and I Iof
os ,,,ere not 1 fled lrnmedla tery.
Harry B. FIsher
Director of Personnel
00:10S
---------
.__._--_. _ _-_
SUBJECT: (Optional)
.... .. __.. _-,--,_._ ......
ROUTING A~!D RECOI~D SHEET
__.. ,_.. --_ ..._.. _-_.. _.._ .. _---_._---_. __._-----_.... _.-_ .... _-_ .. _--_._--------
Sensith-e Activities Perf01 Jiled by the Office of Logistics

---- __.. _--_ _.. ._.. _ _.. ........_ - _., _. __ ._-_ _.- --_._. _ _ __.. ---_.
'-'-" , .. . . ,- -.- ._ __._ - _._-- - - " -
FROM: EXTENSION, NO.
---_._-_ ...- ---_.. _._-_......- ._ .. _-_._

DATE
.. __ ._._-----_.
Director _2. f Logis !j.c~ ---. -+...--:2c..:S....;;5-=1-+_ _.__1_4_r_fI{l_iY__19_7_3 . _
TO: (Officer d",ignalian, loom num!:.er, and DATE
building) f---.. - - - OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number ~och comment to .how from whom
INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column offer each comment.)
RECl'lve 0 FORWARDED
1---'-·_- . ..--+----~----------- ..--------..- - - - - - - -
be~;uty Director. for ~janage-:;---(, SfU ./j/L __ EYES ONLY

._-----_._--_.._------_._---- - II¥-
ment and SerVIces -_ _ ..
I / _ rj:f;·
... _~-_ .._... ..... - - - - -
2.
J - - - - - - - - - - - - -.. --... - . - - - ----.--.- ..--._...- -.-----1

3.
Director of Central
1--_ _ Intelligence
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
I, 10.
•
~
11.
12.
13.
U.
00:109
15•
••• ,........_, •. ,z. ";'" ~" _ _ ' .......: . - - . . "....;..~,..._."" '_. -.. __ . . . . . ;.,.
..
14. 1·/,,I· .....r.y 1973

THROUGH Deputy Director for l'-fanagement and Services
SUBJECT Sensitive Activities~~erformed by the
Office of Logistics
1. This memorandum contains information for the Director

of Central Intelligence.
2. This memorandum is submitted pursuant to advice given

by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 May
that Office Directors report on activities, either under their
cognizance or otherwise known to them, the nature of which
could possibly need explanation or justification when viewed
within the statutory responsibility and authority of the
Director of Central Intelligence. The responsibilities of the
Office of Logistics (OL) are such that in all matters herein
reported, except two, the actions undertaken were at the re-
quest of another Agency component. We have prepared a brief
description of ea~h action involved and then have included the
name of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for
the requests for action by,this Office will have to be deter-
mined by inquiry to the designated sponsoring component.
3. Facts pertaining to both actions undertaken at the
initiative of this Office are as follows:
00110
- 1j,I: I
/..... './ 1 \ L.
f-
~
~UI\lLI
SUBJECT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of

Logistics
C. I Lv U Pi L T
~ 001.1.1.
Logistics
the DD/O, we will not honor any requisition for surveil-

lance equipment unless it has been approved by the CI
Staff of the DD/O.
4. Within the area of contractual responsibilities, the
following items are pertinent:
a. In February 1971, Colonel L. K. White, the then
Executive Director-Comptroller, called me to attend a
meeting in his office, also attended by Mr. William Colby.
Colonel White explained that the Technical Services
Division (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance
to the FBI for a sensitive project designatedJ Kcur-
rently designatedl IColonel White di not dis-
close the purpose of the asslstance being provided by TSD
but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual
matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no information
concerning the mission or purpose of Projectl I sub-
stantive questions concerning the subject should be
addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplished
for the FBI are re orted below. Specific mention is made,
however, of ecause of the dollar magnitude, ap- .
proximately lon, .and the complex technical equip-
ment that has involved in the undertaking.
b. The Procurement Division, OL, currently has two
requisitions in hand from TSD which would involve reim-
bursable sales to the FBI. One such requisition in the
,amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television
cameras. The second requisition in the amount of $11,200
is for two wide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by
Bausch and Lomb . . No action is being taken on either of
these requirements pending further instructions which
will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management
and Services.
c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported
other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel
standpoint. Upon the submission of an officially approved
request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency
would either enter into "accommodation procurements" for
the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by
the issuance' of'materiel from stock. Such actions are
legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This
A~~ authorizes one agency to support the needs of, or pro-
vide a service for,' another Government agency when such
0011.2
" ~
-tvF(>~Y
[1 .. _0 UI~
_
Logistics
action would be more economical and eliminate the need for

one agency of the Government to duplicate facilities
readily available from another. A typical example of this
procedure is purchasing photointerpretation gear for the
Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In
connection with the current repor:ring requirement, however,
I have had our records researched for the past 2 years and
Attachment 1 reflects those transactions which appear to be
relevant to the subject of this memorandum.
d. In connection with the disclosures during the sum-
mer of 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not properly
safeguarding classified documents, this Office undertook
two acts. I directed the Security Officer from our West
Coast Procuremeht Office at the Moffet Naval Air Station
in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy
himself that classified material furnished them by the
Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for.
His report was affirmative. On 23 August 1971, the senior
Security Officer assigned to this Office forwarded a
letter to the Rand Corporation stressing and reaffirming
the procedures Rand must follow in safeguarding classified
information furnished them by the Agency. Of residual
interest in this matter, there is summarized the contents
of a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Executive Director-
Comptroller from the DD/I which is in our possession.
Th'is memorandum reports that FBIS regularly
disseminated reports to the Rand Corporation
but that instructions had been issued to cease
distribution of classified reports. While no
other direct dissemination went to Rand, other
USIB agencies, primarily USAF, were passing
"manyi! copies of DD/I products to Rand as' au-
thorized under USIB regulations. The memoran-
dum also states that Rand personnel had
requested searches and document retrieval from
the CRS facility.
S. In connection with action taken for the Office of
Security, there are three relevant items:
a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requested
by the Office of Security to print a book written by
Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was pre-
pared by Mr. Murphy under a Brookings Institution Federal
0011.3
Logistics
·Executive Fellowship. The book is enti tIed "Where' s

What -- Sources of Information for Pederal Investigators."
It is a full treatise on the existence of sources of in-
formation that may be useful to an investigator. The
book's first printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967.
Due to demand, a second printingQf 600 copies was made
in September 1968. The title page of the book gives
attribution to Mr. ~~rphy, Office of Security, Central
Intelligence Agency, and the Brookings Institution Federal
Executive Fellowship. The book is classified Confidential,
and it is our understanding that the distribution was made
to appropriate agencies of the Federal Government. A copy
of Mr. Murphy's book can be made available for review if
desired.
Sometime in 1972, a representative of the Law
Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) requested
that the Agency give consideration to our publishing, at
LEAA expense, an unclassified version of this volume. It
was the intent of LEAA to make broad-scale distribution
to Police Departments throughout the country. The Director
of Security and I consulted on this matter and jointly
determined that the LEAA request should not be honored be-
cause the Agency should ·not put itself in the position of
publishing law enforcement material for general and un-
classified purposes, and it would be an abuse of our print-
ing facilities.
b. On 5 January 1971, the Director of Security re-
quested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor
vehicles for use in connection with a special support
operation which would last approximately 3 months. The
Director of Security informed me, in his requesting memo-
randum of 5 January 1971, that "This support activity has
been undertaken at the specific instruction of the Director
and has his personal approval." The request was approved.
c. From 1968 to date, the Office of Security has
requisitioned from this Office a considerable amQunt of
materiel which we understand was to be given or loaned by
them to local Police Departments. In certain cases some
of this materiel was issued from Agency stocks and, in
other cases, direct procurement of the materiel was made
by funds furnished by the Office of Security. A complete
listing of such materiel is found in Attachment 2.
cgV 5
001.1.4
· ....~:; (l~ i-
1- \/ j- C ('~ :J I ¥
1_ r L J t1'I"'M~._-+--
Logistics
b. This Office is aware, although it had no cognizance

nor responsibility, that an apartment was rented in Miami
Beach, Florida, during the period of the Democratic National
Convention, 10-14 July 1972, and the Republican National
Convention, 21-24 August 1972. The apartment was used as
a me e t ing p1ace 1_---.- =----=-_-=-_ _-,---=-_---.-_ _-----. -.------
in liaison with members of the Secret Service and rendering
001.:16
Logistics
assistance in connection with the political cOllventions

that were being held. WH Division is the cognizant
operating component on this matter.
7. The above recitation of facts represents, to the best
of my knowledge and memory, those matters which appear to be
relevant to subject tasking given by Yhe Director.
John F. Blake
Director of Logistics
2 Atts
cc: DD/M&S
OO~1G
( (-
001.1.7
.. /
~ "'.
"EYES O(r
r>'~~1
, -
Receiving
Requesting Date of U.S. Depart-
Office Request Item Quantity Unit Cost ment or Agency
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzer 1 1,350 BNDD

TSD 5/16/72 Transmitters, Radio Beacon 8 313 BNDD
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzer 1 1,350 White House
Communications
Agency
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzers 13 1,400 Air Force
.
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzers 10 1,350 State
as 3/23/72 Telephone Analyzers 2 1,375 AEC
TSD 11/16/72 Camera Sets 20 656 FBI
TSD 4/17/72 Camera Sets 10 lOa
;1· .
FBI
TSD 11/18/71 Actbators, Recorders 50 488 FBI
TSD 4/19/72 Tessina Cameras 3 700 BNDD
TSD 12/ 7/72 Camera, Video 1 18,045 FBI
TSD 10/13/72 Tube, Image, Burn-Resistance, 1 4,639 FBI
0 Equivalent of W L 30691
0
.' ~ TSD 3/26/71 Tubes, Image, W L 30691 2 4,607 FBI
~
00 TSD 4/20/73 Cameras, Television 2 18,300 FBI
E-vES GWlY
-_J 1_- ol:~Qpr;T I I
,.~ .
'. ( •• • J-
. ( .(
Ii'
I
!
i
I
I o.
J
!
I
00120
MATERIAL REQUISITIONED FROM LOGISTICS
LOCAL POLICE
ITEM QUANITY
Gas Mask M-9 200
Gas Mask M-17 196
Steel Helmet and Liners 231
Vest and Groin Protector 96

Vest, Flak M-S2 34
Vest, Protective 46
Vest, Grenade 105

Execuvest 6

*Search1ight, Tear Gas 36
*Chemical Baton 6 1/2" 36

I
*Search1ight with Shoulder Strap 36
*Stun Gun 3

ordered for asterisk items.
001.21
14 MAY 1973
TiiKOUGH l)',)fluty Director for 'fa:Hl[:ement 3nd Sc'nriccs

SUBJECT Sen sit i v e Act i v i tic: s r e l' fOr!;; cd 1:)' t LC'
Office of Lonistics
-"
1. This Pl0lJiOranUum contains infon:c t ion for tbe Ji roc tor

of Ce:nt:ral Intcllig';'T1cf}.
2. This Incr. 1ora'ldum is submi tted pursH<tnt to 2dvice gi \Ten

by the Deputy Director for Management and Services on 7 May
that Office Directors report on actiV'iti~s) either undc:r their
cognizance or othendse knOl·m to them, the natur!.\ of uhich
could ~)o$5ibly need explanation or justification ,-·"hC:l vie'.>'ed
within the statutory responsibility and authority of the
Director of Central Intelligence. The responsibilities of the
Office of Logistics (OL) ar~ such that in ~11 matters herein
reported, except two, the actions undertaken were at the re-
quest of another Agency com,onent. We have prernrcd a brief
description of each action involved and then have Included tho
name of the sponsoring component. The substantive reason for
the requests for action by this Office will have to be uetcr-
Dined by inqu1ry to the designated sponsoring component.
3. Facts pertaining to' both actions undertaken at the
initiative of this Office are as follows:
00122
,I ~UllJECT: Scn5itive Activities ferfarmod by the Office of
T • t'les
.,OgIS
I
001.23
~y
SUDJbCT: Sensitive Activities Performed by the Office of
, :
Logistics
.t11C DD/O, He will no t honor any requis it ion for surve i 1-

lance equipment unless it hils been 'approved by the CI
Staff of the DD/O.
4. ~I:i thin the area of contractua.l respons ibili ties, the
following it0Ds are pertinent:
a. In February 1971. Colonel L. K. Khite, the then
Executive Director-Comptroller, called me to attend a
meeting in his office, also attended by Mr. William Colby.
Colonel White explained that l:he Technical Services
Di~ision (TSD) had been requested to provide assistance
to the FOI for a sensitive project designntedJ I(cur-
rem tly designated I IColonel Whi te di not dis-
close the purpose of the assIstance being provided by TSD
but did instruct me to assist TSD on purely contractual
matters. Since the Office of Logistics has no information
concerning the mission or purpose of Project I I sub-
stantive questions concerning the subject should be
addressed to TSD. Other procurement actions accomplish~d
for the FBI are reo orted below. Specific mention is made,
however, of ~cause of the dollar magnitude, ap-
proximately :1 m1l lon, and the complex technical equip-
111 on t that has been involved in the undertaking.
b. The Procurement Division, OL, currently has two

requisitions in hand ·from TSD lv-hich would involve reim-
bursable sales to the FBI. One such requisition in the
amount of $36,900 is for two Westinghouse television
ca~eras. The second requisition in the amount of $11,200
is for two wide-angle surveillance probes manufactured by
Bausch and Lomb. No action' is being faken on either of
these requirements pending further instructions which
will be sought from the Deputy Director for Management
and Services.
c. Over the years, this Agency has often supported
other Government agencies from a contractual or materiel
standpoint. Upon the submission of an officially approved
request, supported by a transfer of funds, the Agency
ivould either enter into "accommodation procurements for ll
the requesting agency or support the requesting agency by

the issuance of materiel from stock. Such actions are
legally accomplished under the Economy Act of 1925. This
Act authorizes one agency to support the needs of, or pro-
vide a service for , another Government agency l'lhen such
001.24.
\. ~....'t\L.'
EYE
SUBJDCT: Se:nsitive Activities rerfor;;l~d by t:le Office of
Logistics
action would be more economical and eliminate the need for

~ne agency of the Government to duplicate £acil~ties
readily av~ilable from another. A typical example of this
procedure is purchasing photo interpretation gear for the
Defense Intelligence Agency element located at NPIC. In
connection with the current reporting requirement, however,
I have had our records researched for the past 2 years and
Attachment 1 reflects those. transactions t.... hich appear to be
relevant to the subject of this memorandum.
d. In connection with the disclosures during the surn-
rne~of 1971 that the Rand Corporation was not properly
safcI;uarcling classified docum~nts, this Office undertook
two acts. I directed the Security Officcr from our West
Coast Procurelilcnt Office at the !··!offet Naval Air Station
in California to visit the Rand Corporation and satisfy
himself that classified material furnished them by the
Agency was both properly safeguarded and accounted for.
His report was affirmative. On 23 August 1971, the senior
Security Officer assigned to this Office forwarded a
letter to the Rand Corporation stre$sing and reaffirming
the procedures Rand must £0110'-/ in safeguar:ding classified
information furnished them by the Agency. Of residual
interest in this matter', there is surrunarized the contents
of a memorandum of 2 July 1971 to the Executive Director-
Comptroller from the DD/l which is in our possession.
This memorandum reports that FRlS regularly
disseminated reports to the Rand Corporation
but that instructions had been issued to cease
distribution of classified reports. While no
other direct dissemination went to' Rand, other
USIE agencies, primarily USAF, were passing
Tt many" copies of DD/I products to Rand as au-
thorized under USlB regulations. The memoran-
dum also states that Rand personnel had
requested searches and document retrieval from
the CRS facility.
5. In connection with action taken for the Office of
Security, there are three relevant items:
a. The Printing Services Division, OL, was requested
by the Office of Security to print a book written by
Harry J. Murphy, Office of Security. The book was pre-
pared by Mr. Murphy under a Brookings Institution Federal
001.25
SUBJECT: Sens'i t i vo :~.cti vi ti as Performed by the Office of
Logistics
,. ,
Executive FelloHsh,ip. The, book is en ti tIed "Where' 5

'What -- Sources of Information for Federal Investigators."
It is a ftill treatise on the existence of sources of in-
formatiori that may be useful to an investigator. The
book's first printing of 300 copies was made in June 1967.
Due to demand, a second printing of 600 copies was made
in September 1968. The title pa~ccof the book gives
attribution to Mr. Hurphy, Office of Security, Central
Intelligence Agency, and th~ Brookings Institution Federal
Executive Fellowship. The book is classified Confidential,
and'it is our understanding that the distr.ibution was made
'to'appropriate agencies of the Federal Government. A copy
of Nr. Murphy's book can be made av~il~ble for review if
desired.
Sometime in 1972, a representative of the Law
Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) requested
that the Agency give consideration to our publishing, at
LEAA expense, an unclassified version of this volume. It
was the intent of LEA.A to make broad-scale distribution
to Police Departments throughout the ,country. The Director
of Security and I consulted on this matter and jointly
determined that the LEAA request should'not be ,honored be-
cause the Agency should· not put itself in the posit.ion of
publishing law enforcement material for general ,and un-
classified purposes, and it would be an abuse of our print-
ing, ,facilities.
b. On 5 January 1971, the Director of Security re-
quested that I approve his leasing up to eleven motor
vehicles for use in connection with a special support
operation which would last approximately 3 months. The
Director of Security informed me, ,in his requesting memo-
randum of 5 January 1971, 'that,HTllis'support activity has
been underta}~en at the specific instruction ,of the Director
and has his personal approval." The request was approved.
c. From 1968 to date, the Offige of Security has ,
requisitioned from this Office a considerable amount of
materiel which we understand was to be given 0'1' loaned by
th.em to local Police Departments. In certain cases some
of this materiel was issued from Agency stocks and, in
other cases, direct ptocurement of the materiel was made
by, funds furnished by the Office of Security. A complete
listing of such materiel is found in Attachment 2.
00:126
Logistics
I
b: This Office is a,,,are, although it had no cognizance

nor responsibility, that an apartment was rented in Miami
Beach, Florida, during the period of the Democratic National
Convention, 10-14 July 1972, and the Republican National
Convention, 21-24 August 1972. The apartment was used as
~nm~~;~~~nP;~~~Ir:emoe;: or tne -5e:ret' ~e: v::e :llCl l:lluelOLlIg
001.27
-
SUBJtCT: Sensitive Activities Perfor,TIed by the Office of
Lot'istics
~
.<.1ssistClJice in connection with the political conventions

'that Here being held. WiI Division is th.e cognb;ant
operating conponent on this matter.
7. The above recitation of facts represents, to the best
of my knowledge and memory, those matters which aprC3r to be
relevant to subject tasking given by the Director.
I JOllIl f'. BIHhe

Director of Logistics
i
2 Atts
': I
.<,
CC: DD/M&S
,
" j
"'I
,: I
'. \
'.' I
i
i
1-
00128
ONLY
SECRE
., ... .' .-
( (
l
I,
!
.
.
,.
00129
..........
\,
(
" .
I
I
r
00:132
. ' .. - --_.-.. _ " _ _........ .• . t- -:

...
~~TERIAL REQUISITIO~ED FROM LOGISTICS
LOCAL POLICE
ITEM QUANITY
Gas Mask M-9 200
Gas Mask M-17 196

Steel Helm~t and Liners 231
Vest and Groin Protector 96 .
Vest, Flak M-52 34
Vest, Protective 46
Vest, Grenade 105
Execuvest 6

}
*Searchlight; Tear Gas 36
*Chemica1 Baton 6 1/2" 36
" 24
*Chemica1 Baton 12"
*Searchlight with Shoulder Strap 36

*Stun Gun 3

ordered for asterisk items •
.,
....
001.33
. [-_.,
_..J
--
U~,cl"'\"-'r;'D
... H •. , I I L
---"'--'
.... .....
~- _,
._--_. __
... -',_ ..
.
_ ........
---~------
_- .........
~OUTING
--
--_..---_... - --- - .
AND RECORD SHeET
_~" .. ~.
[J .. C- r l -_.-
.
----
- - - - - - - - -._._--- --.---- ---------- -----
L' --r "l
~ ~J. ,.:".!
_.._._.- .-_._H .
; f\ . t
-"'-'-- --.---.-_.~- ---
SUBJECT: (Op':or."I)
--------- _ ......• -- -,. __ ... __ _- ._-_.- ----_._.-- -_.-

.... ______.1-
t1.TENSION
- - - - - - - - _.. _ .. _-----_ ... _-- .._... _---.-
NO.
,,-
FROM:
D/OJCS, I ~ --
OJCSJ
.- I ---_.-.'--
!Hq. PATE
TO: (Officer
-
de-s;~nolion,
.. I 11 r;~';~,Y 1S73 ------- .--.-
(oom number, and DATE
building) OfFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to ,h"w from ""hom
-- INITIALS to whom. Draw a Ii.... ac.ron column ofter each Com m E"1I.)
RfalVED fORWARDED
.. ------
1. DD/M&S
I IHq.
2.
3. ~I
Hq.
I
'~G;
S.
6.
~ ?\.,bo- ~f'1 ~l.\M.ll'u (
7.
~V vU ( ~c.\. c\.QS\:-
fu <A~'""'" )
' ' '- w 0 '( V- i'---r
8.
\It e.. \-o.t~ ~ o'cs
9. '$~N\ ~ l'\J.\t~
~ ~~..( . .
10.
I 15 Clt:(=i''C*""
I
11.
1'7 '7)
.
12.
13.
.
1.(•
.,,
15. 00134
FORM
3-62 61 0 US~o~~crs 0 SECRET o CONFIDENTIAL' O INTERNAL
~() -, V
oresl I
11 I\~AY 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, Central Intelligence Agency
THROUGH Deputy Director for Managen1ent and Services
SUBJECT Activities which might be considered sensitive

issues.
I have listed below computer processing projects which the Office of

Joint Computer Support has participated in or is aware of and which
might be considered sensitive issues •.
Most Sensitive Projects

OJCS Project Officer Nature OJCS
Project Organization, & of Reason for
Identification Telephone Project Listing
HYDRA Richard Ober A special pro- Type Of

CI Staff ject initiated data being
1_- by DCI collected.
SANCA lvfachine Type of

I-,O.........S - - - - - - -
index to data in
security files index.
II Information Type of
ORD storage & re- data in
I I trieval of drug
related data
files.
(ORD's project
OFTEN)
Sensitive Projects
[] Computer file
of drug data.
Type of
data in
file.
00135
))0 72-·
.Sensitive P!.ojeets (Continued)

OJCS Project Officer Nature . OJCS
Project Organization, &: of Reason for
ldentif!cation Telephone Proj~et J...i st._i_n-,-,g__
_ _II~
Statistical Source of
'l'SD'------ analysis of data. Con-
I~
psychological tractors are
data. involved
with project.
Sensitivity Unknown, but Possibly a Matter for Concern
Nature of
data. Tech-
niques of
system dis-
cussed with
FBI.
SPYDER Data on
I. ...,O=-S=----- radio frequen-
cies used for
1- support of In-
Place Monitor-
ing System, a
system to identify
una.utho ri zed
transmitters.
DMVREC File of auto- Nature of

I. .O.........S~------ mobile license data.
numbers.
I
File of Agency Nature of
applicants who data.
were not
hired.
001.36
Sensitivity Yl1kn~'NIl:!.J.:>ut E'_?S sibly a 1y1aH~r for Conce rn (Continued)
OJCS Project Officer Nature OJCS
Project Organization, & of Reason for
Identification 1'elt:.Pho~~~___ Proje ct .Listing
As sodation
with the
named
organization.
fq.....
JOHN D. rAMS
Director of Joint COluputer Support
EYE§ ·]LV 001.37

~I&T
[" ] _,"
,
, <-,;>Ii"
I.,U
. LJ " .. 'L
. . .iE GI:LY IJ Ci.i." I .' " ,..I..:. l
I, L. i. :
1 ....._ • __ -. . . . . _-...... ~.' •.• _ ......., - .._ ... _ .
"nOU1"NG
-' [ p ~ 'D h.:C.
f",I'_' nr' -O"D IJI"'ET
c~'It:
~---
SUBJECT:
.. -_..
\C;'f:~,ol)
_.- ------_._. -_._ -_ ....- ,._-_.•.
..
h
--"'-'-"'- ------_._----_._ ... _ .. _ _----_
... .. _... _----_._-------
- - - -..- - . - - - . - -.._----.-----_.--.-- ---------.. c------------------------.------

fPOM: EXTENSiON NO.
Director of Communications
I I Hqrs • -----,-_.
o i--------------.----.--. --.------1
DATE 10 May 1973
TO: IOfficer de,ig~alion, ro')l'Il n"",t,er, and DATE
building) OffICER'S COMMENTS (Nvmber "och cc>mment to show from whom
INITIALS to whom. Drew a line OtrOSS column after each comment,)
RECEIVED fORWARDED
Dm1
I &SI Hqrs. ·'Re f SCi 1- The
----------------------t----+-----t------i at t a che~a---.l"s..-,...l...n----,:::f u r the r
2. response to your request.
---------+----t ----+---.-
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
1.c.
15.
001.38
fORM
3-62 61 0 u~Dr~~~us 0 SECRET
.... - ..... ,: _...... _...... _- .
o CONFIDENTIAL
........... _
O
---.-
INTERNAL
USE ONLY
--', - .. --" -- -
o UNCLASSIFIED .
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION . REGISTRY
SOURCE: ocr I CONTROL NUMBER: _ ~CJ I

DATE OF DOCUMENT: 8 May 1913 DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED:
--
COpy NUMBER (8): LOGGED BY:

NUMBER OF PAGES: two DOCUMENT NO:
•
NUMBER OF ATIACHMENTS: one
FROM: Special Programs Division, OC DATE: 10 May 73
TO
.
OFFICE NAME SIGNATURE DATE
1 ~1)fk..
"D/CO Mr. Jac~ J. Keith
()
2 \nMt <;.
3
. . .
o Approval
o Action
o Comment
o Concurrences
o Information
o Direct ~eply
o Preparation of Repi y
o Recommendation
o Signature
o Return •
o Dispatch
o File
.00139
-.-- ... '._.
1- ~
SCIL----_-----J
8 May 1973

SUBJECT: Summary, Special Programs Division (SPD),
'Office of Communications, Operational
Contacts with Other U.S. Government Agencies
1. Prior to 1969 the OC COMINT intercept unit, 0
which was then in Miami, had relatively frequent contact

with the Miami bureaus of the FBI and FCC, Miami Police
and the Miami Beach Police. The staff provided support
to these activities in monitoring, identification and
DF of specific illegal agent transmissions conducted by
foreign nationals and American citizens in the greater
Miami area. Arrangements for this support were made
thro~gh the DDO'sl I
2. In late September 1972, NSA, through Division D!
DDO, requested that the Special Programs Division initiate
a hearabi1ity survey of certain HP' long-distance commercial
telephone circuits between the U.S. and South America.
The circuits carried'drug related long-distance calls of
interest to the BNDD and other U.S. agencies. Because of
the avai1abi1it of ersonne1 and technical ca abilities
t ..
·3. The Chief and Deputy Chief, SPD and SPD!Specia1

Electronic Operations Branch have been engaged in informal
technical liaison with operating components of the FBI
for a number of years. Initial contacts and arrangements
for support of specific activities have been made by the
Division D!DDO. Support has been provided in the form of
~li&"'TiO SECRET
In::"UA'IT& OF ATTACHMENT
.1- .<
..
•
JlJI4ftilfi
.~
..
8 May 1973
exchanges of technical information on techniques, technical

assistance and training, and the loan of Agency equipment.
In the past several yer:; :::nnr+
sensitive FBI projects -
bJS
been rend~d to
. and I --l SI~ort'l
has been and is presen 0 ~g g1ven to FBI pro ects
I I These proj ects are described in the attache . .
sealed envelope. .
4. An operational test of an HF/DF
system was [~!cOnducted DO and
OC-SPD pers nnel 1n the earl par 0 the summer of 1972.
A location in Miami Beach, Florida was selected for the
tests because of similarity to the actual' target site and
environment in Sa~gon. Receiving antennas were placed on
the roof of the hotel being used as the receiving/DF site.
A hotel employee asked why the materiel was placed on the
roof. .A team member in effect told him that the group
was an advance security segment for the Democratic National"
Convention. No further questions were asked; the tests"
were completed and the equipment was returned to the
Washi~gton area.
ChieL :specIal Pr~grams D1vision, OC

Att.
. 001-41
.-
.~.
9 May 1973
~ .
. ....
. ' ....
;"
•
TO~· ·hET
.I I s~ .001.42
I .. ..A
....-----------------"l~
9 May 1973

SUBJECT: Organizational Dealings with Activities Inside the
United States
o
1. This MFR records organizational dealings with activities

inside the United States known to this office.
2. In September 1972,1 Irequested secure communi-
cations in the Miami Area wlth local offices of BNDD
e communlcatlons ln was never lns a e

advised in April 1973 that there were plans
~un~~e=rw~aY~1~n~.'Mni~a=m7i to combine various Federal agencies anti-
drug efforts under a new Justice Department Division, and at
this time it was not known where the new anti-drug office would
be located. \
IL-----------
3. During Jhe Democratic and Republican conventions,'
I _supported requirements levied by the Secret
service concerning name traces and other intelligence infor-
mation relating to subversive influences which might affect
those conventions.1 provided some'technical advice and
procedural assistance in establishing a useful means of com-
municating between the two correspondents. WAD should be able
to provide a detailed resume of activities supported in this
matter.
•
~E. /ti1H"O...dJ
. Thomas E. "o;r~~nelr
'Chief, Americas Staff, OC
.. 1!~1'1""''''\~:"'--_------'lJTJ(~1.g
~r'~"': •
- •. 1 I .
.'.
I
' ..
,. . ~J
. I
.', ..
'-
----_.. -.. .. ~.- ~----_# __ #~-._------_ . . _.------.. ,----_._- --_.. __.- . _- .-"'-- _~.
SENDeR. WILL CHECK CL,o,SSIFICATiCN TO? ;·'-10 ,30T'-OM

-'r' ." 0:- .. ~:.-~-~;:;.-. I--·-·r··-:·.:-~:~~;~~·.:·:.·-·.·"-r·:T'· .. ~::·:.,'::·-
::::r.......... . .1. ......•J .. _ ... ..... _ ... . ..1....::_......1..... ....• ." .•-
I '
OFFICIAL HOUI'L,G SLIP
I---~---_._-_ ... _-_.. .-.-.-.....--.--.-----
TO NAME ANb ADDRESS DATE
.-----.-----,Tp---------.->-.---- - - _ INITIALS
__. -
....
1 Mr. \Villiam E. Colby "",,( \ \.'\:'l:.\'
..- . - - - - - - - -..- ...- - - . - - - - - - - t - - - - - --.. _--"'.~~
2
;
;"-' '---
.
0110.__
I'
3
i ........
- _ ._ _.. 1 - - . _ - - - -
5
,,.
/
"-,-.~:'
,-J • • .':. ~ _~~. . • ~_('j .. /' ,
--.-.--.-.---.--4------f-..:-----~
6 , .
'''''-
ACTION to. DIRECT REPLY PREPMIE REPLY
APPROVAl '< DISPATCH • RECOMfHSDA nOli
---
I-_+-=-CO=-~:::~.~M.::E:..:.N.:..T __i--l-'-·r_l_lE'- ---l_.--4~r.~E.:.TL.:.:.'R_"_H:......... ,. _ _
CONCURRENCE It:rORMAT/ON SIGPATliRE
..•.1.
.' Remarks:
'.- .........
.
(,--
\.....'" .... -- .~. ~_.
C'-- __..'.
Bill:
r
The attached memorandum identifies
the funds referred to in Chuck Briggs'
notes of 13 and 20 January 1972..
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER

FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. DATE
"
Ins pector Gene ral 30 May 7B

, L,~ ~~ .... .....,
_ ,., ....
rORM I/O. Use previous edilions (40)
1-67 237
)~)~ "Since·these noteSf'are on a' tetally' separate 'sens'itive subject,
• pIs 'pull them from this fi1e- -'. WEC" (Note t!? C/MPS) .
'. .: 001.44
~.
. ........
<.
-
-
-I
I
!
29 May 1973
SUBJECT : Mr. Colby's Request to Inspector General to

Determine Subject Referred to by Two Notes
in a PP/B Memo to DD/M&S
REFERENCE D/PPB Memo to DD/M&,S dated 23 May 1973,

Subject: Water gate Principals - Di reet or
Indirect Involverllent
001.45
!.
.
._------~_.~-._,-~
_I
.. .-.
~~ -'-'-' - -_.. - .•. - -_
....... ... -~.
( ·r ._ • ~ .~.. """';
!>I:"'IOER. WILL CHECK Cf..ASSIF\ (ION TOP AND BOTTOM

~. t ~CLASSIFn:D I I CONFIDENTIAL I . SECHET
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP
TO NAME: AND ADDRESS DATE INITIALS
1 LG
2
r--
3
f- I
.. I
6
I - - - I - - - - - - - - . , r - -.......
ACTION
--------f--..,.-
DIRECT nERi I)REPARE REPLY
---
i - - APPROVA-l-------+--+'D'""'"I-SP:;.;.A-TC-K~;;....;..--;--t-R'-'E.:.:::C"-'OM=M-'EH;.;.;;D"-A;;.;TI'""'"O-H--t
COMMENT filE RETURN

CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGHATUilE L:... I
Remarks:.
r--\
l
00:146 \
FOLD HERE 'ro RETURN TO SENDER \
FROM: NAME. ACDRESS AND PHONE NO. DA,-e:
II
W. E. Colby 23May73
U:,\CLASSIFIET> I I CO:"FIDENTIAL I SECRET
fOIM NO. Use previous editions (40)
1-67 237
.. -." ..
". "
\
.
.I 1.,_ :
.- ...:,' . . ''''''' ,\ ",. _........ ..

, I
" " t_
: . ;" '
"' ".i - "
."
",
, 1 .
...
'.~
r
I
i
~~~~;;---;.;.:-:-::------
_~ _,~B~,
i
FOR.., NO
\ A~G .--:.C'
5~ 10....I •. :EPlACE5 I
(47)
WHICH MAyFORM USED,
, .. _, .•_r•.•. \0·10\ -------
.. .
. .
, .
.!
. ....
.'
..
\.
~ ~
. : '"J-' .
....
"
.,
,
. ,,-, .: '"
, ... -' ~ ... • .. ."--
.:.... j
OFFICIAL nOLTI.\·C SLIP

---.----------------------------- ._----- -----_._--
n
TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE INITIALS
1
-'"
W. E. Colb
_.. -- ... _.- '5 J';} '3 ,,'v<-
--_._-_.~-----_._ .._ - - - - - -~------ ._-- .-
'---"I
2
----- .---.---------------------.--1c------ - f -..- - - - - - ...
3
- - -...- - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - " - - - . - - .. -.----~ - - - - . - - - - - i
4
--- . - - - - - - - ---'---------.------- --.-----f- -------1
5
'.;..
\---1------------_._-_._--- - - - - - . - - j - - - - - - - I
6
_._._ . - - _ . .._ . _ - ...- ... -------------..- - - .. - C - - · - ·T - - - - ' - - - - · - - _
I,CTlON UIF.ECT i~::'FLY

1---------- --.---- PREPl,tlE REPLY
f..PPROVAl DISPt.TCH RECOMMEI1DATlOt(
I---I----------;---'-{
COMMENT filE RETURN
- -----------il-----il--------t----t-----------i
I
COt/CURRENCE IHfOR:·M.T/OH SIGNATURE I
,l
R(,Hlnrks: l
.' .
th~) kJ(JJ ("'(..1 u..k \ Lv.. Cl.-L....., VJ4· lIJ .(.

~
I
&-.t. ~, \J of' piS Ct- n. ..; f

t.-.o.01/. ""'0 ".... I
9C. \- c..." r"'C\lc.L ~ r LV- ~ .' -+<_d'~
Charles A. Briggs, D/PPB 5/23/73

UNCLASSIFIED I I CO;'-iFmENTIAL I SECHET
. fORM NO.
1-67
23"", Use previous editions (40)
"
.'
J"
. . .- ... : -00:148
-. , .. ..- ~
, , ..: ~ • ,.'lo... '<i
-
~LI
Do - 76
MEHORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director fur },bn:-,gc,ocnt cnd Sel"viccs
SUBJECT: Watergate Pdncipals - Direct or Ind.irect

Involvcr:.1cn t
1. This memorandum l-csponds to the Director's l-equcst for

a no-port of ,,-ny involven~ent in ;,ny c;>"p<.1city since] .LmuJ!'y 1969
'\71th Messrs. Hunt, McCord, Liddy, Young. or Krogh.
i
2. I have had none with Hunt, Ljdcly or Young.
I
.I 3. My McCord contact was indirect and occurred sometime
Ij during the late 1960's when I wc;s Director. Office of Computer
Services. I opposed plans for Technical Di dsion, Office of
I Security (under Mr. McCord) to acquire a separate computer f()1'
pf DD/S&T (then ORD)
I, its In-Place Monitoring System. r
W<lS the computer individual WOLUdg wILlI I b ?ond , I think. would
have details. .
i
4. The Krogh contact also was indirect and involved his
request, first through 6MB, that CIA fund iorcign tr~vcl on behalf
of the Cabinet Co!!.mittee on International Narcotics Control. Indi-
vidual phone discussions are noted in the athched. The Agency
I I
I
focal points werel
r land I understand
as forwarded relevant documentation. Copies of
mcmorand3. from :Messrs. Krogh. I land Colby arc attached
also.
5. I held a staff meeting yesterday to pass the request to

all OPPB employees. One officer who was <lttending a funeral will
not be available until tcmorrc.w.
I1 O\b 'L P. '.\ c'\-.o D ".1.. g 6' 2',1':1.:1: ,14:JO
D_~ ,,~ .. _ \ (':
~
""l'/·J::r1
... _-,:) I" \ J)
-.Jo.,J
I J D\bDb' Ej,G'2 OD]~\ :sn G lsI Charles A. Briggs

J - N.' E COLO). 0
O~;a ~ ] - ~qq~G22GS
Charles A. Briggs
Director of Planning,
Programming, and Budgeting
Attachment
As stated
00149
~
I .•
., :j
Attachment
23 May 1973
4 Feb 72 Call f:om Jim T,~ylor. OMB I"e "Bud:! Krogh and his deputy,
Wc.ItCl: Minnick, of the DOIDf:StiC Council ,"vho phn forden
travel in connection with theh" narer,tics interests. Jim \VcIS
alerUng us to their intc:ntion to <.5k us for funds for the
b.' ave!.
7 Ft.~b 72 Fol1c}vrup from Taylor: P1<ln 3-5 u'ips for 3 individuals--

all in FY 72. Cost probably SlOK. l.finnick ready to m:1ke
first trip. I lis
plugged in. E:-:Dir s<iid OK 1'0 Tchy;~n
visit .
7 Feb 72 See attached memo frc,m Egil Krogh, Jr, to Bill Colby «ond
follow-on memos [Tom I I
(21 J ul 72) and Colby
(2 Aug 72).
12(1) May 72 JOhl' Hurley, OMB called, mentioning possible Krogh/

Minnick attendance at a Latin American (Station Chief?)
conference on narcotics. He also sa; d o ff ~he~herd.
\"~hite House, w?.s laying on a~~f with
I: for
hi:nself, Shephetd ;mel Mark Alger. 0:,1' to Europe.
23 Jun 72 I Icommented on Krogh/?',Hnnick interest

in getting cA' activities, including large-scale Pt,f.
on narcotics front. I Ipu~hing small-scale PP.
6 Jul n I Icalled. Notes say only: "Minnick-Hurley film.

We will send. It
~ Aug 72 I Icalled re Colby letter (attached), Said travel

Ol'del'S ready; need money this PM (No record in my
notes i.1S to who W,lS traveling when, but have faint
recollection of its beinG to Me::dco City), I
and I I
contacted by I I '-------
1 Nov 72 B ~.latcd?
C. ~a1l. Again no~es
are cryptic:
r:::e~~ft-6raceL f Survey BNnD problems/
001.50
-
· ,
"
13 Jan 72 ExDi!- (Colby) said DCI had approved $30K for sensitive
CS project - no details.
20 Jan 72 Reminded ExDir re $32K he said DCI OK'd.
r--~
~-=
001.51
- ..... _-." .... _-- . ---

, / THE WHITI::: HOUSE
"
I /
- 'j
.. \',/,\SHINGTON
:
February 7, 197?
MEMOHANDUM FOR }3ILL COLBY

,.
SUBJECT: BUDGETA..TZY SUPPORT FOR THE CABINET CO?vl1vUTTEE
ON lNTERNATIONAl., NA:.'1.COTICS CONTROL
The Cabinet Corn..rnittee on International Narcotics Control was created

September 7, 1971 .. by the President to centralize his attack on the in-
ternational drug traffic.
The COHl1'Tlittce ddes not have a separate budget.
Salary and administrative support for its sxnall .. full-time staff has been
provided by the Executive 'Office of the President. Other expenses are
being. charged to the constituent agencies and departments.,
I I
: The Bureau of Customs .. BNDD .. and AJJJ/Office of Public Safety have
provided support to date.
The CIA should be prepared to defray n~t more than @een thousand'
, dollars in overseas travel expe1'1ses for Cabinet Cor'runittee staff during
\. ,
theremainder of FY-1972.
II Walter C. Minnick .. tp.e Com-rpittee's Staff Coordinator, C2.n be contacted

for further details.
I
I
I
" Thank you fox your assistance.

j
J
f)Jq0~
II. Egil Krogh, Jr.
I, Executive Director
Cabinet Committee on
International Narcotics Control
cc: John Ehrlichman
Assistant to the President for Domestic Aifairs
Mark Alger _
·OMB .. Chief l 'General Government Programs Division
-----.----.--rr~l
CIA .
ltcpre3entative, C CING """forking G roup
.
001.52
.......... , .."
-
,~
• , • I I • • • .• Of •••• " ••• '. • •• ~ " • • I" • • • '0' • • • - • •"'; • • • • • • • • • 1'" t" .. • • • • • • • •
PPB 72-1063
2 AUG 1972
.. catJ~n-t I
1. MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for P1an~
~O-I
I
;i
"
~l
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 1973 Budgef:ary Support {or
.o.~, tne C:ilitnet COn:"..roiUee on International
Nar-cotics Control (CCINC}
j
;
! Me;&) to Eillir !rrn/E/DDP/NARcOGJdtrl
I REFERENCE:
!! o Zl July 1972; SOlme £!ubject
ij
1. This is in response to the referenced merr.o regarding

use of CIA ftmds to cover travel c~peIlses ior the Whits House
Cabl.net Committee Staff fQr Fi3c:il Year 1973.
2•. You ~re authorized to obligated up to $15. anD Cor the use
.0 of the 'Yhite Ho~~e Cabinet Committee Staff tor !ravel eXpen3~&
during FY 1973. Obllg.:l.tion ::hould be record~ againat the G/DDP
it allotment Olud travel ordor3 issued against yO-:Jr own appropriate [an
i number.
i
•
3. To the exte:1t thalyou tl.re una~le to ~:9orb this -requIrement
-j
1 within your preQent: allotment, we ',,,ill h~ve to arr,:).n,ge ~cme rcpro-
gOranuning l:tter In the year to cover ~his unbt:egeted item.
~=====:::;-----I
,.
.1 I
0.
w.E. Colby
. Executivo Dlrector-Comptroller
O/PP~ ~hg 2 Aug 72

Dis tribuHon:
Orig &- 1 - addressee
1 - ExDir ·00153
1 - ER
_. 1 - PPB Subj (BMS
J 1 - OIF r
1~r--- ----aLl rlReat~rono

\ .
.
.'
21 JUly 1972
.......
. f
"
NEHORANDUN FOR: Executive Dl~ector -' Comptroller
.
~
VIA · ~~~~~}.~?UDeputy, Director ror~Plans
~
" SUBJECT-.... .,· Fiscal Year 1973 Budgetary Support for

'. . the Cabinet C0il11ilittee on International
Narcotics Control (CGINC) : .. ;
. " , .
.
..
.
••••
~:
"!'
: "0- . . .
...... .. '
"; .0 .":
. . 0.
'.
. ,I. At oUr Halter C.. Hinnick~ Sta.fr
:tnvitation~ N:~.
,
'Me~ber or the CCINC~ is scheduled to attend an4-~~rticipate
in. the Region21 Narcot-i cs Seminar sponsored by L}jH) Di v:tslo~
f
on'27- 28 .JU~7 1972~ '._ , ' .. : , .,,~"~'" ';".: " .~ ';
I 2~' 'In accordance with procedures adopted for travel
i
'f.,
of \fnite House Cabinet Cmmnittee Starr in FY 1972~ it 1s .. :
.' requested that tunds to cover the cost of Hr. Minnick's
, ~
'trip be rele2sed. Attached herewith is· a copy of a formal '
l ,request from Hr. Eg.i1 Krogh dated 7 February 197-2 to Hr. .
i Wl1li&~ Colby. r2questing travel fuhds.for the balance or
FY 1972. Hr. Krogh is nail prep2.ring a :foma1 reque.st .Lor.
J
·1 ..
$15,,000.00 to cover tr2.vel expenses for lfnite House Ca~ine-'G
Committee st2~f :for FYrl973.· I will :ro~jard this request '"
"
•• \0 to your office as soon as it arrives •

.il
; .. .-
.'\'
II . \
I'l!
I!
:1,
.,•
.. '·,tacomen.t:· A/S
-
I
J
"L-------:--------:------:-'
. 001~4
.. -",
t.i.o-. "
. . . r· i :".',
. ). ;' t If f>
DD/M&S 73-.1 809
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management and Services
SUBJECT Contacts with Individuals Named in the Watergate l\1atter
1. I am addressing this to you instead of to the Director of Central

Intelligence since I doubt that the information contained herein is of such
sigl1ificance to warrant his interest and because it has been on record with
the Agency since July 1972. However, if you feel that the information is of
such interest that it should be forwarded to the Director I shall put it in the
proper format to do so.
2. My only contact with anyone named in connection with the

Watergate and related matters was throughl la former
Agency employee now retired and living in Winterhaven, Florida. In
December 19711 Icalled me from Florida and advised that he
wanted to get in touch with Howard Hunt. He said that he did not have Hunt's
home phone number and that it was probably unlisted but that since Hunt was a
former employee, could I contact Hunt and ask him to givel la call.
I had only met Hunt once about 10 years before but I agreed to relay the message.
I called Howard Hunt at his home and told him thatj Idid not have his
home phone and requested he calli
relaying the message and said that he woUld ca 11
little consequence to me in December 1971 but in July 1972
C
~ Mr. Hunt thanked me for
This seemed of
lof the
.
Office of Security contacted me in regard to the FBI investigation of the Watergate

situation. At that time I informed I lof the telephone call from
·1 lin December 1971. Attached is a copy of a Memorandum for the
Record prepared by I las a result of our conversation.
3. In the summer of 1972 I took my family to Disney World in Florida

and took that occasion to drop in to seel II Itold me in
a private conversation that he had been interviewed three or four times by the
FBI in connection with the Watergate affair and he related to me his contact
_ _ _ _ _1 {VIS IBJ'y SECR£r.C_---IU0155

- L· t. .... __, {
(2)
with Howard HW1t. On 19 July 1972 after my return from Florida I reported
this conversation to the Director of Security and made it a Memorandum [or
the Record. This memorandum was sent to Mr. Colby and a copy of the
memorandLUTI is attached.
4. Other than knowing Mr. McCord through his employment with

the Agency and meeting 110ward I'funt once in about 1959, I do not blOW nor
have I had any contact with any individuals named or knowledge of related
matters now receiving attention in the press .
./.~.:. ....--.:<.- .'

f .
~",~, ,/.,
_
",..._"
.r/
/' - ._... ,~'
-._.-C../,../
",~.-."
. '''7~'''L
·.diarles W. Kane
t' ..... -
Special Assistant to the
Deputy Director
for Management and Services
Atts
00156
'.
r------------
: t,'
\
~1Et~ORANDUM FOR: Executive Direetor-Comptrolle
Per our conversation on Monday.
!
I
I
!
I
I.
i
I
!
20 July 1972 :
I
:
(DATE) !
,.
I
I
FORM NO. REPLACES FORM 10'101

t AUG 54 101 WHICH MAY BE USED. ( 47)
.
&
001.57
19 July 1972
SUBJECT: Conversation "\\,-ithl _
1. 'While on leave visiting Disney World in Florida, I

dropped In to see I \v,rho lives in Winterhaven, Florida.
_ _--Jlretired from the Ag<3ncy about fi\.re years ago on disability due
to a serious heart condition. He \vas with the Office of Security for
about 20 years prior to his retirement.
, 2. During a private conversation I Itold me that he had

been interviewed three or four times by the FBI in connection with
the McCord-Hunt affair. I asked him why he had been interviewed,
and he told me that in late 1971 he had been contacted by Ho"\vard
Hunt who suggested that he consider an assignment as Security
Officer for the Republican Party. 1 Ivisited "\Vashington in
January 1972 to discuss the' proposed position with Howard Hunt
who apparently was acting on behalf of the Republican Party. 1---1
furni'shed a resume to Hunt and discussed the position with him.
Ultimately, he decided not to accept the position because he felt
that his heart condition would not allow him to become imrolved in
such activity.
3. According to I I
during the meeting with Mr. Hunt
they discus sed some of the requirelnents of the job. At that time
they discussed a need for both a positive and a counteraudio program
and a need for a good security system both before and during the
National Convention. I lindicated that he sincerely believed that
the Republican Party did need a security officer and a good secul-ity'
programmer but felt that he could not afford to accept the job even,
though it was a very lucrative offer. Apparently, money '.vas not a
probleln.
. ,
1°0158
4. WhcnDdeclinec1, he indicated that Mr. Hunt asl,ed
for any other I"ccommendations he rnight' have. r'\ccording to I__ ---J
he told Mr. I-runt that most of the people he kne\v ,vere still in the
'Agency, but he did furnish the name off !who might he
possibly ready to retire from the Agenty.
5. I linformed 11ie that he as sumed that the' Bur"eau

obtained his n2.1ne due to the re smne he furnished 1\Ifl'. Hunt. He
said that the Bureau had talked to him on three or four occasions
and that he had written up about a 40 page statement concerning
his dealings with Mr. Hunt. \Vben asked about rvfr. McCord, 1-=---
said that he really did not know McCord that well and declined any
knowledge of Mr. McCord I s technical capability:
6. I !indicated that he had not been In touch

with Mr. Hunt smce the early part of 1972 and knew nothing of
the Watergate operation. He stated that he had gained the impres-
sion frOln the Bureau interview that the technical device s \vel'e being
removed at the tiITle of the arrest and were not being installed as
,?riginally reported.
7. All of the above information was volunteered by D

-----1 and I really did not get involved in any discussion all. the
ITlatter other than to com,ment that I hated to see the Agency's nalne
connected with such an incident in any way. The above conversation
took place during a 10 o~ 15 minute period and no other discussion
relating to this incident was held. It is being reported for the record
and for information of the Director of Security.
&
00159
..
17July197Z
SU BJECT: Charles W. Kane

I I
1. Last week Special Agent Arnold Parham of the FBI con-

tacted the ActingDD/OS. He asked 'whether or not the Subjects
worked for the Central Intelligence Agency. Pre \ciously, reque sts
of this nature were followed up by the FBI \vith an interview of the
subjects.
2. I briefed Mr. Colby who is the Agency1s focal point on

the "Watergate" case and the Acting DD IS of the FBI inquiry.
Mr. Colby suggested that 'Ne determine the extent of involvement
~nd indicated that we advise the Bureau of their employment.
3. 'When Agent Parham was again contacted and advised

of the Subjects' employment with the Agency, he b.dicated that
the Bureau does not wish to interview them. /'; .,)
CU.!j;.2.c-~-v' c
\
:J
. 4. The office of the DD/pS will intervie . . v_--.----_----",_~Iin/~ ~A.r~ .
the same fashion as I Iwas previously intenriewed. ! . r{'l 7/~'
5. I called Mr. Kane both at his office and his residence
. and learned that he is in Florida and will :return to duty on 17 July.
I called M:r. Kane this morning to advise him of the inquiry.
6. Mr. Kane stated that he has no firrn conclusion as to

how the Bureau obtained 'his name. He stated that he has seen
Mr. Hunfon only one occasion in 1959. At that time Hunt was
the Chief of Station,l I The meeting ,vas occasioned
001.60
by the fc1.ct that Mr. Kane
Deputy Director of Security
00161.
. _. _.. _.... _.
._- - . -- - ;--- -
------ ---_._---
'--"- .- _..
jf.foll".P.\VILL CH(,"'« t·o .'\55 .. nON " c..,- t. -.. .: ;'j'JfrOM
-,.(.... 'J.\~"I .-
_
.~r. I- - . - --_. - n.....ED .. j'-_~~~<..u,.:;i'.:~ f.i \'1. 1 '.J~~"f:lIET_,
OFfiCI \L HOCTI:'\G SLIP
-- --------. __._...... .. ..... -- --_.-
TO ~lAME
.- .
AND ,,,,;"."CiS DATE
--_.----
INITIALS
••• 0_ ••
------
1 DDM&S,I Hqs.
. ---_ . .. - -"- e.-._
~,
-' -
%
3
J)~ r qSO
_.. _--- _.
-, .
."- -
S
, ,
"
ACTlOIf DIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL DISPATCH RECQl.1MEHOHIOH
COMMENT fiLE RnURN
'--
.. -- CONCURRENCE lKFORMATIOI Sl.GfiATURE

. .. *"4 .• ;
Remarks:. "-;'''-'-.-0:'__
~
-
' .
.
,
, .
'",:.
"
.
.. ..
'.
........
. "
;
":;~:'
. :.'........
--,
: "
...
"
>, ' . " .,

--
. .... ."
\ ...... ···.1· : . ':"~'''"";
.
00:162
FROM: NA .... E. ADDRESS AN'D ,.t4ONE NO, DATE
P/PPBI 8 May 73
FlED I "'"v.... ru E!'ITIAL I SECRET
foalC _0. Use previous editions (401
1-67 237
t_. ;0"'
8 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Centr~ Intelligence
THROUGH: Deputy Director for Management and Services
SUBJECT: Involvement in Sensitive Domestic Activities
'. -~fI'· . ~"

. 1. As chief of the~QPP Systems GrouB.~jprior to 1969,. I W<;l.S involved
in providini5 data processing support for'the following sensitive projects:
a. jeI
..
" "~
Staf«· Mr. Richard Ober's program for processing data

of U . S.- clUzez{s beli~ved to be militants! subversives, terrorists·,
etc.
#-. .........
bd~I Stajyand Office

for recording data on foreign and
of Medical'S·.'r'V1'ces
u.s.
prod.::'-- physiciansL
_
_ _ _ _I
c. A Systems Group sponsored program of common concern
listing travel of U.S. citizens to and from Communist countries.
2. In the same capacity my staff and I briefed police officers from

New York State and Chicago at the Del's request (Admiral Rayborn) on
data processing techniques related to biographic intelligence (unclassified).
\
3. As a member of O/PPB, I have been aware of five programs with
possibly sensitive domestic overtones.
a. DDS&T/ORD's contract with theJ

I ITh e VIP He . ,. .thr---ca:-:n-a.,.,--B.. ----e.. -h--,:a.. .".v-="l--=o..,. .,r-P.. . -::-::r-,-e-:::la,. ,. l':='c'r.ti'-o=n=--
<jystem •.
b. DDS&T IORDts Project OFTEN which involved the collection

, ~ of data on dangerous drugs from U . S. firms. I believe Mr. Helms
• terminate"d this· program last Fall.
Sp;eftE'l'/.ENS!TI~EiL.-
00163
L
, .
, ~.
SEGRRT/SENSJTNE
c. DDS&T
5 use of ERTS-A data to analyze Soviet wheat
rrogram.
~clence and Technology Gl~OUp

O/PPB
' ..l,
\
\
'.
- SE6iPET/SEN§ITIVE
00164
-
f : I ;;; t J. I ( .1 .• ; . ~- ·1- f ' \- 'e i
", .
VIA: Deputy Director for Management and Services
SUBJECT: Watergate IEllsberg and Like Matters
1. No personal involvement, direct or indirect to :my knowledge

on my part or my staff, with the Watergate or Pentagon papers cases.
with Young on security regulations or with classified releases to
RAND. I was aware, many years back when in the DDI. that certain
classified papers were released to RAND from the production "
offices. One staff :me:mber .1 while a :me:mber of the I
IC Staff. did have a RAND contact which he is elaborating on
separately.
2. _ There are so:me sensitive activities or projects of which

I am aware, which are :mighty close to the borderline of legality
in ter:ms of Agency :mis sion, including:
a. The CI Staff COber) project
b. Thel Ip roprietary, 1'--- _

c. An Office of Security narcotics cover project
d. A CI Staff funding-channel project with the FBI
I I
""'6f~T~~Lr NSITIVE
'-£YES ONL. 00165
I
j
3. One of my s talf offi cers l while in OCI
was the briefing officer for th~dAttorney General, bu can recall
1\
nothing in his dealing \vith Mr. Mitchell which would have any relevance
to the current issues. A couple other staff officers are reporting
separately on SOlTIe sensitive activities in which they were involved
prior to cOlTIing to this staff.
-
'00
Director of Planning,
PrograrulTIing, and Budgeti"l1g
00166
l.-,J
..._- ,
U •• I..LIlJ .... IIIL.L} .. L-l ,.. ONLY
J.>E . _. ._. U ,_,-" .. . __· ......
. . _.. ._ . _ ~_ ~_.<_
n.. l--J
4
....... "' .... _
1

-------------------------_._-- ----------_._---
SUBJECT: (Optional)
----.---------------------.------.-.-r------ r------.--------.---.-.----- --....-------.-.-

FROM: EXTENSION NO.
C. V. S. Roosevelt
Chain-nan, TSCC ..---.......,I-O-ATE-------------·-----· ._-----
_.__. Hqs 8 May 1973

- - - : - - - : - - . - - - - - -I - - t - L - - J t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t
TO: (Officer designotion. room n\l",ber, and DATE
building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to $how from whom
INITIALS to whom, Draw a line acroSS ~olumn ofter each comment.)
RECEIVEO fORWARDED
1.
DCI
-~
2. '--- -J
~---------j---+----f----
---- -----j
3.
-4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
1-4.
._·..•.:..~H.
15.
. ,~'
001.67 ,I'; "'"'.: ~.
-'J- .: f.:' - ~" . ".~:.

UNn'ED STATES INTELLIGENCE BOARD
TECHNICAL SURYEILLANCE COUNTERMEASURES CO~L\IITTEE
OFFICE Of THE CHAIRMAN
TSCC-D-386
8 May 1973
SUBJECT Support Furnished to Elements of the Government

Outside of the Intelligence Community
The Interagency Audio Surveillance Counterrneasures Training

Center (ITC) was established at the instigation of this Cornmittee and
opened in late 1968 under the executive management of CIA. The
need for such a school had been recognized by the National Security
Council's Technical Subconunittee as far back as 1962 and was re-
emphasized by the Security Committee of the USIB in their October
1964 report titled lIDamage Assessment of the Technical Surveillance
Penetration of the US Embassy, Moscow."
Membership on the TSCC has been confined to agencies and

departments who are represented on the USIB. From time to tilne
other elements of the Government have indicated their concern over
the audio surveillance threat and asked for membership on the
Committee. In all cases they have been turned down with the
suggestion that they take advantage of the TSCC's product either
through liaison with the security organizations of the Conunittee's
members or by nominating students to attend the ITC. During
CY -72 the following students were trained at the ITC:
Central Intelligence Agency 10

Defense Intelligence Agency 5
Department of the Air Force 25
Department of the Army 50
Department of Justice (BNDD) 4
Department of the Navy 5
Department of State 3
00:168
Departn1ent of Transportation 3
Internal Revenue Service 3
Nation:al Security Agency 1
United States Secret Service 6
White House Communications Agency 2
117
The ITC has furnished training only to em.ployees of the

agencies and departments of the Federal Governrnent. State and
local police departments have not been detailed to the ITC.
Cornelius V. S. Roosevelt
Chairm.an
...;...
00169
Retirement Infonnation - E. Hov,'ard I-h.mt
1. Date of retirement: 30 April 1970

- ,
2. System: CIA Retirement and Disability System
3. Grade Clnd salary at time of retirement: GS-1S, Step 8 - $28,226
4. Creditable civilian service used in computing aImuity:

17 ~~y 1948 to 8 June 1948 - Economic Cooperation ArunDlistration
9 June 1948 to 19 Februal~ 1949 - State (ECA)
8 November 1949 to 30 April 1970 CIA
s. Annuity:
At retirement - $1,020 per month
At present - $1,181 per month (which includes cost-of-living
increases since date of-retirement)
6. At the time of retirement Mr. Hunt did not elect survivorship benefits.
This meant that upon his death, his wife wuuld not draw a survivorship
annuity. By letter of 5 April 1971 he raised the question of changing
his election but ",as' informed by the General Cowlsel on 6 May 1971 that
this could not be done. By letter dated 5 May 1972 Mr. Hunt asked Mr.
Houston to raise with the Director the possibility of being recalled to

duty for a short period of time, after which he could retire again and
elect survivorship benefits. By letter of 16 May 1972 Mr~ Houston advised
~fr. Hunt that to call him back to duty solely for the purpose of permitting
him to change survivorship benefits would be in violation of the spirit 9f
the CIA Retirement Act.
001.70
-
.....
-~
, -..:
I -
SECR~T/5ENSTTDTE
22 May 1973
Bill- 1
i
Attacbed are the reports Bill Colby asked to see:
,
1. Restless Youth (September 1968), No. 0613/68,
Secret/Sensitive/No Foreign Dissem (Copy 78).
This document was produced in two versions--one

with the chapter on radical students in America (pages
25-39) which was sent only to the President, Walt Rostow,
and Cy Vance (former Deputy Secretary of Defense); the
other version without the references to the American
scene was disseminated ~o twenty people outside the
Agency. This document without the material on the
US was updated in February 1969 and copies were sent
to the Vice President and Dr. Kissinger. A still more
abbreviated e.dition was sent to the Attorney General
in March 1969.
2. Black Radicalism in the Caribbean (6 August 1969),

N';.---T8-i9-j6·9-~·-S~~~~-t/N'c;-F'orcigt;'I)isse m (Copy 142).
3. Black Radicalism in the Caribbean--Another Look

n~- -i~~;;-8--19 7-6r;"N;'--'O 517T7 O,'S~:;~
l' ~-ti N'o-F 0 ~~Tg~--
I )L~;\;rn (Copy 98).
ITJTrd."!i.:,:",.
"'T_,IenCC-----v19''-.,-----yx-rr''crT''cT.1C'.CT)'I.- - - - -
A ttcl.cl\ III ':: Ill:3

001-71..
".
c
c
t
..; .
S..E NDER WILLCH. • CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM
... ~
1
i
I
i
OFFICIAL ROUTI~G SLIP
TO NAME ANO ADDRESS DATE INITIALS
1
M ... "inrir'lrrp
J
I
2
I,
I'~:
3
..
)) I,
I
6
,.
,
~
ACTION DIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY
APPROVAL DISPATCH RECOMMENDATION
COMMENT FILE RETURN
CONCURRENCE INFORMA'nON SIGNATURE
ltemarks.:. .. r
.
.
001.72
O/DCI ,
12/24/7L
I IIl\lrW I I .• T I
Us. previous edilions (40)

fO'" 1100
1-67 237
I
.!
Ii
,
.;
1. Di:-:~:;("v}.n~·.t h-n t,) tb(": C~:bi.l,et ,,!~~d \d.thir; ·chp.

I ~~ t:~ 11. t:. ~~T~'1;~.:~·~·~·:~~~·i_~7·t-}··-:-_li-f!(, i S ~.·~·!·t~·. i. t i \Ie
I.)~:~~~:'~' i:-~~~f{~~7t,.-(SS--r~~Ii~
f.~~~·:;·:~:;=·~7:~<~;f-'-l1:--~;-~~~·,.~·-L·~~·~.···[:~·tt'\f} t t. ~" r ~ ~ .. :' ::"~:' (i·;~~~-0i---t. :\;J..}}~? 1 o£ !~ ~it~d
t,L::..t 1"D1)1 it: (;' ~l':~~.'::lLi."'~:.? \Jf tt·~i..: f~.:..~,.:-'::..cr.:J t:~ 1.i.1:.~·:<c.;:-: t. it1 ttf:" l~lrcit:l{:!';1
~~! Bt;"ic<:nt <.~iESi!..1i~JJC~ ,~·(.~uld rf',,:--,'ult in <;ot:~\icit·:·nt"l~:.· rl'.) ((;l'iety ,
particulR~ly in the university world, and bpcausc pursuant to
~r. n03t0~15 iustructicn9, the author itlcludod in his te~t
a ~t~dy of btU~0Dt radlcsls ill tho United Stnte~, thereby
l~: cf.·!;:;'ir.g th!"· 1.gency I ti chn-tf.:r. Wi;.) hreve f>~r:itb,ed th~ pnpf:li"
if)'l' ci~·,~::·.~d.l:;l.t:on to the WCl'1U'::'l'S of thl} Pri,:~;i6f:'l.1t·s Cr.hin(~t
",r:d .' ... thil: the Irlt~~lliGG)cE! O,)~~unity by elit::.ir.at'ing alto-
f(:,th.:?l" tc(' (i;r-ptf!r \Yrd.ch dh;cusses Studer.ts for 1\ Df:'lli.ocrnlic
50ci~tf (SDS) and by ~trikiDg from the PrOsp0cte sectlo~ all
:D·.·::t:Dfj 01' ~TS.
::::. Oi...U'~/e
th<:!' C~:-l";f,l.<nit)' but within th;:: G:..\,J:'l:r"u:·rit·--
1'8 i.-;·el i( "the bf4si.c t;.o;.:t shoul0 t;e iurtner i'C'lL";df,-:>1:
V<j t.fi"il t.
tht:- PUl'.9~~~;.e of. €limita"tir-.g ev~"n tho tri.ost <:"Eu~l l"<:f{;r('l;('f'
l
, to tho dO~~5tlc &cene--lest S02eon~ infer from such B chen~e
rFf{~n:r;c(' thr.t tIl;;:- C'~rigi.n~l p~per hp-d cor,t;tir!~~d K f.''!.ctio:-· C)ll
f~0rlc~D student~. Tb~ nin0tc~n country ch~ptrrs ~bich form
:P:trt:. II of Ycmth c~n L>,: d1.~::;'-:::;lulV·d ";;>';.thin the
n·:--:;tle!~s
CoYernm~nt, pruvlded that th& contralE nppro~ri3t0 ~o thQlr
cl:uH.i.!lcat1.on r..re Ob:!H~rv,~d. To do th~ ('diting- nod rcpripU..ug
. r~ uir~d ~0ul~ t~~e p~veral onys at l~n~t.
~. n~lfasp to the Ecadcmic worla Dr to tb~ pUblic--

For tht; l·Cll:}:.H~& .~:;.pt forth .c-.. bo\e, \!i'': D:::-ll;YVe tI1~t.. rcleas'iE' of
tb~ bllS ic t.~ ...; ~ 'lVould harm the At;';C'r,cy. The coun t ry Ch%:lpt~r$
could uot be relea~ed ~ithDut first b~ing rQwritte~ ·to
~liminiAt{\ e.ll cla~eifiQd informfition. Once this ...::..s dora~t
00173
I .. ...
~
... , "
~
<..
_',_. .- .
; ~~.~ f·• I
:" ~I()' \",.)~·ilc! (:~l)l.tc-atf: i~'i~)J.-;:.:-;.t1~)~~; ;-.. 11·t~~· tly L91,'~~~ il~.;Ll~ J.L'i tli~.:-
~~:'i)!J rt~I··~~~~. '1';;t''":-."f'(j is r,o l(:c~..: err C'Yf:l.. t lit~'r;~t~~l'"(; l~'n tL!~
.-.:;~l; .. ~,.·;;t ( ) f :~tur~e:lt (.:i5r:!:.:1~t; ''-ir'tui;.11)' E:'I1.>ry r:'L:L,l:i..'s!·~(--r' i!~
,.~J:;.:;e··::~~t Inn:>:t or!r:~ tit1<: t)n hls ('ur1't:'nt 11!:;tir;;~~. );:::'Y;,.::V1.. C,
't_:'Li;~-lt [L,~~('·~.(;ic:;s (,Jf Ec,·v·~.lrr~:::;{?:nt, 2t.:cb r:.s !I(!:;.lth, "·\;~.~(:;_·t·((cd ; l",d
t' c·l f i.:' r e, II s. ,,- c· Er·t).n:~ J r(~cJ l'"C:':" C, E.TC 13 t..-r n t 1. e E" u,l;· j ".~ < t :.'. il c? :cc t""
p'c'.:' r)l, .1'\':(\ to pu!, 1 i.~'; h t ~~ (. i r.- . ~. i r,C ir;~~s • Cc' L,:">r, r., t; ~:. !" t 1 Y, \ ,:: }· ..·,Ci))::-
.".~ r~ct t.o:, ~;-'.~. i:!-:' t l)·,.":l; 1 ie 1>:,·1 (.';~; ~··0.
Ii
I
i
I
I
!
II
\
00.174
\ ,
\
\
;11 ~ \.. ~.,I.l.' J.~
I " • No F(lreign ISI<?1Il
SCI il'c
Restless Youth
SEPTEM BER 1%8

No. 0613/68
001.76
... ---- -- 78
N cJ .
.
rsL{K:-. ~f«(\~
~ C hb ,\ _.
i
~f\\y \-o~I'-
001.77
.....
~-..~~' .. -~~
14 Hay 1913
r~10RANDm1 FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Research Project on Robert Vesco
1. On 16 October 1972 Messrs. Ereckinridge andI

in the course of a Survey, were briefed on activitie O~ ClJe
Atlantic/Pacific Division of the Office of Economic Reoorts. One

project cited was a query from the Director, apparently at the re-
quest of Secretary Shultz, to the effect, 1I~'lhat do we know about
Vesco," the man then running roS. Two of OERls analysts were assigned
to the project and, working through the Domestic Contact Service,
spent a day going over the files of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. There apparently was some contact also with EUR Division
of the Deputy Directorate for Plans and with the Office of Current
Intelligence.
2. The information above is based on rough notes and obviously

is sketcqy. It is cited now not to suggest any wrongdoing but because
of the current publicity about Vesco and the probability of continuing
probes into the 'subject by the press and the courts.
Scott D. Breckinridge
"
00:1.78
, '
Director of Central Intelligence
Please handle in this channel due to classification of attachment.
WARNING
This document contains classified information affecting the national
security of the United States within the meaning of the espionage
laws, US Code, Title 18, Sections 793, 794, and 798. The law prohibits
its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to
an unauthorized person, as well as its use in any manner prejudicial
to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any
foreign government to the ,detriment of the United States.
THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMMUNICATIONS

INTELLIGENCE CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES
It is to be seen only by US personnel especially indoctrinated
and authorized to receive COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE
information; its security must be maintained in accordance with
COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE REGULATIONS.
No action is to be taken on any COMMUNICATIONS INTELLI-

GENCE which may be contained herein, regardless of the advantages
to be gained, unless such action is first approved by the Director
- 001.79
TOP SC:CRET -
· .
8 May 1973
FROM Deputy Director for Intelligence
SUBJECT Activities Possibly Outside CIA's

Legislative Charter
1. This memorandum responds to your instruction to

report any activities which might be considered outside CIA's
legislative charter.
2. All Office and Staff chiefs in the Intelligence Directorate

have reviewed the past and present activities of their components.
I have received responses from all of them, and none reported any
activities related to either the Watergate affair or the break into
the offices of Ellsberg's psychiatrist. Although contacts with
three of the people allegedly implicated in these incidents were
reported, these contacts were on matters other than the two
improper activities:
Hunt: Col. White, Richard Lehman, and I talked

to Hunt in late 1970 regarding his preparation
of a recommendation in support of the Agency's
nomination of R. Jack Smith for the National
Civil Service League Award.
Mitchell: While Mr. Mitchell was Attorney General,

an OCI officer was assigned the task of
providing him with daily briefings on
foreign developments.
00180
~ET
CIA INTERNM>uSE ONLY
Young: Harry Eisenbeiss andl ~f CRS
had frequent contacts wlth Young during the
summer of 1972 in connection with Executive
Order 11652 and the implementing NSC
directive. This involved visits by Young
to CIA to discuss information storage and
retrieval and several meetings of an inter-
agency group dealing with the implementation
of the Executive Order and directive.
3. In accordance with my instructions. several Offices reported

domestic activities which might appear questionable to outsiders.
Their responses are attached. Most of these activities are clearly
within the Agency's charter. but there are a few which could be
viewed as borderline.
Des accepts information on poss ible foreign

involvement in U$ dissident groups and on the
narcotics trade when sources refuse to deal
with the FBI and BNDD directly.
-1 _
Des. for six months in late 1972 and early 1973.
was acquiring telephone routing slips on overseas
calls.
-1 -
NPle and eOMIREX review satellite imagery
from NASA programs to identify photography
too "sensitive" for public release.
,
-2-
~T-.ET 00181
CIA INT~~~~USE ONLY
. '
NPIC has examined domestif coverage for special

purposes such as natural catastrophies and civil
disturbances.
OCI, in 1967 and 1968, prepared intelligence

memoranda on possible foreign connections with
the US anti-war movement and world-wide student
dissidence (including the SDS) at the request of
the WhiteHouse.
FBIS has on occasion supplied linguists to work

directly for another agency, e. g., to the FBI to
translate Arabic in Washington.
FBIS monitors radio press dis patches and reports

covered by copyright. These are circulated within
the Government and stamped "Official Use Only" •
. This has gone on for three decades without problems.
FBIS has monitored and reported on foreign radio

broadcasts of statements and speeches of US citizens
such as those by US POWs in Hanoi, Jane Fonda,
and Ramsey Clarke.
I:JDVVHl'\D vv. rhUCIUn

Deputy Director for Intelligence
Attachments
-3-
S~ET 001.82
CIA INTERN~USE ONLY
· .'
i
\'
I
\
1
i
00183
· '
7 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Intelligence
SUBJECT: DCS Domestic Activity
To the best of my knowledge, DCS has not engaged in any

activity outside the CIA charter or that could be construed as
illegal. Some of the functions that we perform under HR l-13f
(i) of providing operational support within the US to all
elements of CIA and to the USIB-member agencies, however, are
perhaps borderline or could be construed as illegal if mis-
interpreted. For example:
5. Collect information on possible foreign involvement

or penetration of US dissident groups, but only ina
passive manner and only when the source has ·refused
to pass the information directly to the FBI.
6. Collect information on the narcotics trade, but again

only in a passive manner when the source has refused to
pass the information directly to BNDD or the FBI.
001.84
· '
SUBJECT: DCS Domestic Activity
10. Acquire routing slips recording the fact of overseas

telephone calls betwe~n persons in the US and persons
overseas and telephone calls between two foreign points
routed through US switchboards. This activity lasted
for approximately six months but has ceased.
00185
i
-\
,
i
!!
I
,
1
!
\
,'.
00186
1"-
~T
EYES~
7 May 1973
VIA Deputy Director for Intelligence
FROM Director of Current Intelligence
SUBJECT Activity Related to Domestic Events
1. OCI provided current intelligence briefings

to John Mitchell as Attorney General. with the approval
of the DCI, this practice began in the pre-inaugural
period in New York and continued until Mr. Mitchell's
resignation as Attorney General. The OCI officer
assigned to this duty had a daily appointment with Mr.
Mitchell in his office at Justice"
2. The briefings provided were strictly on foreign

intelligence, and were a legitimate service for CIA to
provide to an official advisor to the Pres"ident. who sat
on, among other bodies, the 40 Committee. It must be
presumed, however, that our man's daily visits were
known and speculated on elsewhere in Justice. The
problem comes in the potential press treatment: "CIA
Officer in Continuous Contact with Mitchell."
K:L\CIIdL U IJelll(lOOll
Director of Current Intelligence
00187
CIA INTERNA!, USE ONT Y
7 May 1973
VIA . Deputy Director for Intelligence
1. OCI began following Caribbean black radicalism

in earnest in 1968. The emphasis of our analysis was on
black nationalism as a political force iP the Caribbean
and as a threat to the security of the Caribbean states.
Two DDI memoranda were produced on the subject: "Black
Radicalism in the Caribbean" <,6 August 1969), and "Black
Radicalism in the Caribbean--Another Look" (12 June 1970).
In each a single paragraph was devoted to ties with the
US black power movement; the discussion primarily concerned
visits of Stokely Carmichael and other Us black power
activists to the Caribbean and other overt contacts.
2. In June 1970, Archer Bush of OCI was asked to

write a memorandum with special attention to links be-
tween black radicalism in the Caribbean and advocates of
black power in the us. The record is not clear where
this request originated, but it came through channels
from the DCI. The pape-r was to be treated as especially
sensitive and was to include material provided by the
Special Operations group of the CI Staff. The CI Staff
material was voluminous but did not provide meaningful
evidence of important links between militant blacks in
the US and the Caribbean. This, in fact, was one of
the·conc1usions of the paper. The memorandum was produced
in typescript form and given to the DCI.
00188
SEC~'if
3. For several months in the first half of 1968

the Caribbean Branch wrote periodic typescript memoranda ..
on Stokely Carmichael's travels abroad during a period
when he had dropped out of public view. Our recollection
is that the memoranda were for internal CIA use only,
although a copy of one was inadvertently sent to the FBI.
KIcnaLU Lenman
.'.
erA INTERNAL !H,M: QW);,¥
00189
..r .. ~F.T
EYES~
7 May 1973
1. In late spring of 1968 Walt Rostow, then

Special Assistant to the President for National Security
Affairs, tasked the DCI with undertaking a survey of
worldwide student dissidence. Confronted by ~mult at
campuses like Columbia and mindful of the violence
accompanying· student outbursts at Berlin's Free University
and elsewhere, Rostow sought to learn whether youthful
dissidence was interconnected: spawned by the same causes;
financed and hence manipulated by forces or influences
hosti~to the interests of the US and its allies; or likely
to come under inimical sway to the detriment of US interests.
2. The paper was pr~pared byl 10f OCI

with the assistance of the CA and CI Staffs . . The DDI,
DIOCI, and I ~et with Rostowto elicit the reasons
for his or cue PLesxueht's concerns and to agree on the
sources to be examined,'the research methods to be followed,
etc.
3. written during the summer of 1968, the most

sensitive version of Re·s:t:le·ss· Youth comprised two sections.
The first was a philosophical treatment of student unrest,
its motivation, historY, and tactics. This section drew
heavily on overt literature and FBI reporting on Students
for a Democratic Society and affiliated.groups. In a sense,
the survey of dissent emerged from a shorter (30 pagel
typescript study of SDS and its foreign ties the same
author had done for Mr. Rostow at the nCI' s request in 00190
December 1967. (We no longer have a coPy· 1
r---'------------------,
~T
EYES~
4. Because of the paucity of information on foreign
student movements, it was necessary to focus on SDS which
then monopolized the field of student action here and .
abroad. A second section comprised 19 country chapters--
ranging from Argentina to Yugoslavia--and stood by itself
as a review of foreign student dissidence.
5. Because SDS was a" domestic organization, the

full paper" "Res'tl'e"ss You"th, including the essay on world-
wide dissent went only to nine readers. A copy may be
in the Johnson Library.
6. Following the paper's favorable reception by

the President and Mr. Rostow, the DCI briefed the NSC
on student dissent. The sensitive version subsequently
was updated and sent to the White House "~n February 1969.
7. The less sensitive text was disseminated in

September 1968 and then updated and issued again in
March 1969 and August 1970.
Klcnara Le1lman
OO:l9:1
r
'.
WARNING
This document contains classified information affecting the national
security of the United states within the meaning of the espionage
laws, US Code, Title 18, Sections 793, 794, and 798. The law prohibits
its transmission or the revelation of its contents in any manner to
an unauthorized person, as well as its use in any manner prejudicial
to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any
foreign government to the detriment of the United States.
THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMMUNICATIONS

INTELLIGENCE CHANNELS AT ALL TIMES
It is to be seen only by US personnel especially indoctrinated
and authorized to receive COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE
information; its security must be maintained in accordance with
COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE REGULATIONS.
No action is to be taken on any COMMUNICATIONS INTELLI-

GENCE which may be contained herein, regardless of the advantages
to be gained, unless such action is first approved by the Director
001.92
TOP 6e;CRFT
.. - TOP !:BSP~;b:
EYES ON
7 May 1973
'.
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director o~ Central Intelligence
1. In late: 1967 OCI participated in the preparation

of several short intelligence memoranda dealing with the
foreign connections of US organizations and activists in-
volved in the anti-war movement. The main purpose of
these reports, prepared at the request of the White House,
was to determine whether any links existed between inter-
national Communist elements or foreign governments and .the
American peace movement. The conclusion reached was that
there was some evidence of ad hoc contacts between anti-
war activists at home and abroad but no evidence of
direction or formal coordination.
2. In October 1967 President Johnson expressed

interest in this subject and ordered a high level inter-
departmental survey •. In response to his personal request.
to the DCI, Mr. Helms asked the CI Staff to collect what-
ever information was available through our own sources and
through liaison with the FBI and to pass it to OCI, which
was directed to prepare a memorandum from the DCI to' the
President.
3. A book message requirement was sent to all stations

to report whatever information was on hand relevant to this
subject. Although agent reports on Communist front opera-
tions overseas were of some value, the primary source of
information on the 'activities of US activists--and that was
quite limited--was sensitive intercepts produced by NSA,
which had been similarly tasked by the White House.
001.93
r
~9RETII
EY~
4. A draft memorandum was jointly prepared by

OCI and CI Staff and forwarded to the DCI. He passed
this typescript memo, dated 15 November 1967, to the
President personally. The White House copy is now in
the files of President Johnson's papers at the library
in Austin.
5. Brief follow-up memoranda were prepared and

forwarded to the White House on 21 December and 17
January 1968. According to our best recollection, no
further finished intelligence reports on international
connections of the peace movement were produced.
xc~ ....... XLCC::c ...... .... ........... ec;.
TO~PRE.TI I .
EY .
ON~
.
00194
.n HZ' $ 111['" r Dr
/ . . . • . ., . .
.... .,
11
, .
r·····
(
L ,.
rd
: I:
I j'
~
l' ~
l',I
II!
! :!
Ii.
l i'
III'!i
t n
; j!
~ if
I I'il
,/1:
, ,!
; ;1
!, 'j"
I:':I
I
I;
t'l
I:
I:
I'
00195
1j
··~~~:!!!~~.~:~'~';'~~~;;:-~~N":~W~'!llI\II~,~i~!f""!!'j~,."",_".(j"" ,.•• ,~ ... ,.~ ._.
j
I
!
; l............ 7 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Intelligence g,li,.{J
SUBJECT: Contacts with David Young
1. In the summer of 1972, I had frequent

contacts with David Young. He was in this
building under my control once. These contacts
related solely to Executive Order 11652 and the
NSC directive concerned therewith. Young was
apparently at the time in the process of drafting
the NSC directive. The visit to the building
under my control was for a briefing on CRS processes
for storage and retrieval of documents and is
apparently reflected in the paragraph of the
directive concerned with the Data Index. I visited
him in his White House office at least twice in
the company of an inter-Agency group concerned
with the Data Index.
2. In August of 1972, r lalso

visited Mr. Young's office in cne company of an
inter-Agency group to'discuss CIA compliance with
the data index instructions. To the best of my
knowledge no one in CRS had any contact with
Mr. Young in his role as a "plumber."
H. c. EISENBEISS
Director, Central Reference Service
00196
'.
7 May 1973
'.
MEMORANDUM FOR: O/DDI

SUBJECT: Involvement In Domestic
1. This memorandum responds to the DDI's

request for a listing of any questionable
involvements in domestic affairs. I do not believe
that CRS is doing anything that a reasonable
man could construe as improper.
2. CRS does, of course, have several programs

to acquire still pictures, movies, videotapes
3. CRS files do not generally bear on U.S.

citizens or organizations. The biographic file-
building criteria specifically excludes U.S.
nationals unless the person has become of such
major importance in the political life of a foreign
country that the file is essential. To m knowledge,
onl 2 ersons so ualif •
have no way to
U.S. defectors
00197
SUBJECT: Involvement In Domestic Affairs
4. The CIA Library has several informal

snag files intended to aid the librarians in
answering the kinds of questions that they know
they will get on a continuing basis. An
appointments file is a collection of clippings
on appointed federal officials: who holds what
job when and what is his background? The extremist
files are a collection of folders on a variety
of organizations and a few people with intricate
organizational links. Any sort of extremism
is grist for these particular files., And a few
persons, e.g., Rap Brown and Eldridge Cleaver,
have dossiers consisting almost exclusively of
clippings from public media. These files are
unclassified and consist mostly of clippings
from the public press: U.S., foreign, underground,
scholarly.
5. I am not aware of any other kind of

involvement in domestic activities that is not
related to development of techniques or logistics
or legitimate traininr Ofn~R:.P~:~:~~:~~s

Director, Central Reference Service
00lS8
I
i
I
I- ,
.'.
00199
B May 1973
" i
!
Ie tionable ~~ C Pro ects
,
..... /. 1. Leaks of Jaclc Anders ..
_ •. ~1.
In January 1972, NPIC erfonned im D"e erJlal1cement techniques on~W
'. " .
tapes of a Ja,ck Anderson s ow'. The p se was to try to identify
. , serial numbers of CrA. do ents in.And rson f s possession. The reques.-t
" :' was lev:al"on NPIC through he Office 0 Security." '
" . ,.
... ;.
,2. The poppy. hoj ect
. '. ; ' .
"
NPIC ,has provided the ervices of e PI to assis~ an interagency
effort to ~tect poppy cuI ivation. II addition the Center has provided
.j ,
the QJIltractual mechanism support 0 the Bureau of Narcotics and
;., .
D~erous Drugs for a mult spectral ~ p study by a private company.
~
:5. Reviews of NASA Collee ed Ima' e

" NPIC has and continues to conduct eviews of satellite imagery from '
,i NASA. programs' to identify' sensitivetf .~fames of photography not releasable.
to the public and ,to ascer ain the in~lligence potential of tIle iwagery.
I
1
'i. 'f
'I.
This ~ervice has, been pr ded for GBlll:jNI and. ERrS photography and pre- . ,
par'atlons are undenvay for rev.i~ of SIllY ~ m.agery. ',',"
4. , ,
. :
."
,
"I
:
, NPIC has been requeste to prQ"lid'3 number of 1001\5 at domestic
,','
.,
.:{
, cover~gefor special purpoes. Bxe.:-upl ~ :Lliclude:
. ' ~ Santa Barbara Oi Spill
'. - Los Angeles Earth ake '.
- Sierra Snow (flo threat),
- Current ~Kssissi i Floods
~Hurricane Canmdle Damage on, t e Coast of th~ Gulf of r.fcxico
- Civil Disturban~e in Detroit .
- 0El? u. S. Data Bas '
I '
.!,,: ..
:., ..
, .'
I '
00200
. :'.
0020.1
8 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: DDI
SUBJECT Sensitive Activities
1. FBIS has been engaged in no activities related to the Ellsberg

and Watergate cases.
- :
2. FBIS operations occasionally extend to the domestic arena. From
time to time, FBIS linguists are made available to DDO or Office of
Communications components for special operations (usually abroad) involving
close-support SIGINT work or translation of audio take. On one occasion
recently DDO, on behalf of the FBI, requested the services of several
FBIS linguists skilled in Arabic to work directly~for the FBI on a short-
term project here in Washington. The arrangements were made by Mr. Oberg
of the DDO CI Staff. He said the project was very highly classified and
D
that FBIS participation was approved by Mr. Colby and the Director. FBIS
participation was approved by the Director of FBIS after a check with
the ADDI. Other examples of sensitive linguistic support work are help
in the handling and resettlement of defectors, the recent assignment of
an employee to the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs to transcribe
recordings in a rare Chinese dialect, and the detailing of another
Chinese linguist on two occasions to assist in the U.S. military training
of Chinese Nationalist cadets.
3. Within its responsibility for monitoring press agency trans-

missions for intelligence information, FBIS publishes and distributes
some material which falls in a "gray" area of copyright protection, libel,
and privacy of international communications. Pre~s services controlled
by national governmen~~ and transmitted by radioteletype without
specific addressees,e:.g. the Soviet TASS service and the PRC's NCNA,
are monitored by FBIS and the material is disseminated without restric-
tion. The legality of this has been affirmed by decisions of the
Office of General Counsel. I
00202
Sf'~SfTIV£
. \
4. The routine FBIS monitoring of foreign radio broadcasts often
involves statements or speeches made by U.S. citizens using those radio
facilities. Examples are statements made or allegedly made by American
POW's in Hanoi, by Jane Fonda in Hanoi and by Ramsey Clark in Vietnam.
At the request of FBI and the Department of Justice, and with the
approval of the CIA Office of General Counsel, we have on occasion sub-
mitted transcripts of such broadcasts to the Department of Justice as
part of that Department's consideration of a possible trial. In such
cases, we have been required to submit names of FBIS monitors involved,
presumably because of the possibility they might be required as witnesses.
(In one case in 1971, an FBIS staff employee was directed to appear as
an expert witness in the court-martial of a Marine enlisted man charged
with aiding the enemy in a broadcast from Hanoi.) FBIS views all this
. with misgivings. Monitoring of such broadcasts is incidental and we
ru~ attribution of their news to FBIS, and we should not be considered
policemen maintaining surveillance of traveling Americans.
1
.!
E. K. ....-
Director
Foreign Broadcast Information Service
-2-
'SECBET 00203
SENSIfiVE.
.
-
.J
'" .,.~.' .: •..... ~.
, " ..
I 3.
Ie
5
6. .
7.
8.
9.
10. i.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
I
!
I
61 0 uSfor:,~":.cgu$ "tJ1- St C"'RE~i
- ......~EjI-..,C"'fJOl't!nI"'l!F't'1i DI"I1EI!'t.~:I"I.i't'IAft'I.tt-...- . ~_~~_:....L.~I:II.~~~~.I,j~t~. ~iLL~y~....-....- .-....,...~_ •. ~.~t:~5~1!!.~~_.
FORM
.\ 3-62.
., .. - _..
.~_. :- __ ._-_...• '" __.- .. ---
..~ ~_. --~
.• I,. , "i\
D::eu:'}(::n tr-l tl011 S1.;;.::.rort for Use in tIle

United StiJ,tes
1.. As you '·l.:;.'C ~>.\';a:,:·e th:Ls ci'.cic:; pl'ov:Ld0S eJ.ocum.ont

support for a variety of covert activities. \
L--=- -:-::,..---;::-=-_-:------::-::--:--_-::-::::-::--_ _---:----'\ Specific use is not

alway's available to this office atid should propt?rly come from
the requesting office who can provide the details. U.S.
alias documentation use in the United States is approved by
the Of£ice of Security and normally bas the concurrence of
Central Cover Staff or FI and.CI Staffs. Requests received
by this office ·from. outside the Cls.ndestine Service are
approved by an appropriate office of the DDO •
. 2. A review of this office's document support files for
the period 1 January 1972 to date indicates that the following
llumb~:r of U.S. alias document requests were fulfilled for
probable use in the United States. The statistics below are
broken down by requester:
00205
\.
2
'
.,
.
.~.. \.
, ·;~tCRlI
"
00208
·-
-
QU_ ... ll -, . ,;q'_ .'j~t:I:XV 11
/ Director
Off5ce of Technical Service
CC -1'DI /sr-T
• :....J ..>...
•
5
3.
~
",-------- ·--11
4.
OTSI . ~
..
Attn:
5.
OTS/EXO
6.
DD/OTS
7.
D/OTS-
/~
8. ..
/'
'
",'l~"""
..... /, ,,/ '
"
\0.-' ." -" ,
~ .:.-
1 ~~ tI·--..-
./d.J~~ i
9.
\
10. "
L..TSIJ7-1V!PS:File
11. ~------,
~
12.
13.
14.
15.
"'-..
0021.0"
fORM
3-62 61 0 U~D~~~~crS 0 SEEKEY E3 e8UFIBEfHIAL o INTERNAL
USE ONLY ,0 UN(lASSIFIED
. ~ ..
.'. ':-._,
.,.:., -'"
L----_I
.1.Lat~;.ind971 (Decemher •. I b~li¢ye) the D;!?:putyDireetor

··· •. !b:t;{£.n:e~i;;p~5,~it;;()£fice. :::De,;pa4~ent:;'Of;State.(Nrr~RQbert.:rolu::.son.)
.~.ipf~l1aJ.ly;;q;'tli~~e, o.n~;he.~h~:r:;J;I¥'lt ;.Qui.ce .:mignt·b,orrow .a ,·srrral·l
.:,.'
'::~~lb::;:~;;q;~q.);:~@!:f~r~~lf~.the··.J?iie cto1;' o:£i;.:et~Pa.ssp'ortOff.iJ~e
·~:'~~s.::'E~~.~¢sj~~~t):tm'!ite:co'r d a l1'1e;~ting·. shehads.cl1:eduled with
~i~pf~5;~t.ative·s'ofaforeign government.. .
0
..
~ '.. :.' . ~ -.,
I conveyed this requ~st to the then Chief,

2.
I I
and subsequently held severa SiOllS
.\¥.ith..J:~p.r,eseIitatives of our I
p£fic~.It was d~cided to loan
:tl\le.'¥J$rl$;~p:()rtO££icea'small conune'rc1al. recorder (Norelco
. Ga-ssetteRecorder, Model.150). which we had in stock •.
- -'. .'.3. Ar,epr,~$r:mtati ve{jf'o.ur Trainin~Bra11~hI

I bnd I;~d. .~.~;t.'~'r:ad.;J;he":li!ec. order to 1vhSS. I$:nl~hl:-:"~'.'T;nIT.l.nIC""'·""e~
an,d,:~ ~
I·demonstratedthe recorder's capabl.hhes
and:instructedeJ:'in its u~e •• She did not seeIntoo pleased at
tb;e~'·rEkording quality; however. the recorder was left: with heT.
4.
On.JIlis date (21 May 1973) I asked Mr. Johnson to
qke.:ck.oJ:l"the.statuso£,.t;he r;e,<:;or.d.er. He said i.t was. never used
in any 'way. I'therefore retri:eved it from the Passport Office
ahd delivered U:to Training Branch I I
0021.1.
•• I
...~:.. .-
__ .lOmrJ
....__ 0 _._Fmfj)f
__ . ~ I_ _I
..
,
... :'.
.'
..) '"
'':' :S"
.,
:~~" .
., ....; .... .: .
. :~:~-:
.. ,.-' .....
4 _ _ ~ •.. : . . .
------_._ C'"
.,.
.. . ,_.~._._.:'-.
1
-- - - , .. _.
...
.
.. -- ...
DOCUMENT CONTROL M(~~1~ll

..0 .... NO. "IEPLACItS .. 0 ..... ,,"-.
238
- - ---- -1
1 MAY... WHiCH IS OBSOL.ETE
==-=-- ,., 'I~EC.'~L·I·ORIG'';· C~';T-'-;~-;;O:------

I
I
DATE OF DOC I DATE REC'D I DATE OUT SUSPENSE DATE CROSS REF'ERENCE OR
. POINT' OF 'FILING I
I \
I
TO
FROM DATE I
I
ROUTING SENT ~;
SUBJ.
~
00212
-::-----------:.:....._-------;----------·--1------1----
COURIER NO. I ANSWERED ... 1 NO .. ~E~~~ ... ,•..•.• __ ,' ••
3
./'~ . . .
.j
\
MEMUrMNDUM FOR: Mr. Colby
"
Carl Duckett brought this up and said he is

very uncomfortable with what Sid Gottlieb is
I, ;reporting and thinks the Director would be ill-
advised to say he is acquainted with this pro-
I
~
gram. Duckett plans to scrub it down with
Gottlieb but obviously cannot do it this after-
noon.
~,
..
·1
I
.i FOR'" NO.
0021.3 :"!I
REPLACES FORN '0-101

tAUG 54 '01 WHICH MAY BE USED.
I
-
.
.
~ .~ , .
.!
•
' .
."
. ~" ... ." ...
~
~//"-:-/
,
i 'J
.. , .. "..': .'~' L
'. ~.. :; ":. ~
LJ .~.
.~
'. 'i..
..... \1
'.'
"',- ·······1
'1". 'C "_ "
I:_'.~~'~ _'" "._.., . . __

.. .. ...... _;
...... - _ •..._-
-
:~;:d1.;Cy G,~;_tlieb
..... _-------
C;-:,.>f, TSD
...
.- - - - - - - - - . - - - - . - - - - - - 1..- - - - ; - - - - - - --~----
3.
4.
.'.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14,
15.
'. 002:14
fORM
3-62 61 0 us~or~~~~us 0 SECRET o CONFIDENTIAL o INTERNAL
~
""."'.
~.
\ ... ' ... : - ~
;." I;
". • '. .- ".• • i <• • .
::-"1EMOR.:\NDLnA FOR: . DeFuty Dir0ctor for Sc~"c:ncc & Technology
1. Te'7hnical Services Division's charter (CSI 1-8) requires

that it provide technical assistance to both CIA operations a.nd
other activities as Inay be directed by tl:.c D';;i.)uty Direct·)!' for
Operations.
2. Over the years the chief non-CIA recipients of this

support have been the Departrnent of Defense, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous
Drugs, I1nlnigration and Natura.lization S,:-rvice, Departn1.ent
of State, United States Postal Service, Secret Service, Agency
for International Developmen"t, and the \V"hite House.
3. While varying widely among the different recipients, these

services have included training and lnaterials, and in a few in-
stances participation in the fields of audio and visual surveillance,
secret writing and related communications, personal protection,
alias docmuentationand questioned document examination, disguise,
conceahnent devices, electronic beaconry, illicit narcotics detec-
tion, and countersabotage /terrorism.
4. In most instances requirements for this support are

·received by TSD through higher echelons (Office of the Director'
or Deputy Director for Operations). Unless the service involved
is a t:dvial or continuing one, the request is referred to the
Foreign Intelligence Staff Departmental Coordination Group for
coordina tion and approval at the appropriate Agency levels.
Approval within TSDby the Chief of Operations or Development
and Engineering and the Chief of TSD or his Deputy also is re-
quired.
5. The ,attachment lists the primary services provided to

th~ organizations named in Paragraph two.
.' ....
E2 IMPDET
CL BY 059098
00215
l.' .........
.. 2 -
6.. J.:~:·:;::.~}ncc i)f f~)~.~1;;:·d :-,-:·l".~Gr~~!.l ~_d(:n1it'y '-~":~Ct:rr1\.'.~-!t:·i1~.~)~1 1:;y

·',i.5J) ):; conl..c(;l.l,,;rl ;~.(.:C(J',-d·~i1g : f ) t\~/O l)C()C"1.d crli'(;!"'i:i.: lYF)e 1..)£
j,"l~ (~l.: i,.~~ ~ ~ J"; (i 11(1 ty F~ c of (1 C't"= 1_il :1;._' ..: ta. ti C;1 r C:i1:·L (: S ~'( ·d..
,': _-\ 1·".:«.: ~.~ , .... ~ t
for (1t:::~·!,~.i,':':ti a,i"('.;t d(JC'nn,·li~J11a.. t~()11 [J. t.:.n:1 (1 D))O /\_i:\~:::). J)i'.·~l ~:~ :()11 13-
11 i)ll ',) r \,,~ (] ;.\ [t:,-; r 1) r I') per \I ~;.J. :.~];;' 1'i on.. ~-'l'" e c \~·:o r Id {~I,)\-·~.: :~t: (..-, ~l r,,~, l.i CH1.
In;;.y ::.'equil'c !f0·ale extra coo~crE;;::?.tion however, \
7. Unless ordered o:h..:::c,v:'sc by higher Agency aU:~l.)rity,

no U. S. docUluentatiori is issued by TSD Headquarters ""rithout
prior coordination with the Office of Security. and the Central
Cover Staff. TSD Regional Bases require at least the valida.-
tion of U. S. documentation requests by the COS, or his
designated ,'c:->resentative, of t!lC rf.:qucsting Station. Because
it could be usedl lno
U~ S. Birth Certincatels ISsued WIthout approval or me vvd .
via Central Cover Staff. Backstopped luajor credit cards are
issued by Office of Security, not TSD.
8. Provision of forged docun"li:mtation to non-DDO requesters,

whether they be CIA or other Agency requesters, always requires·
approval of non-TSD offices. Support to the military for instance
\vould be validated by FI Staff/Departmental Coordination Group
at HeaCiquarters or by the COS overseas having responsibility for
coordination of the operation. BNDD requests are coordinated
with DDO/NARCOG. Requests for documentation of Immigration
'and Naturalization Service is coordinated via the Alien Affairs
Staff.
9. Authentication items are issued all. a loan basis and must

be returned to TSD or acco~mted for. After any documentation has
been issued, TSDretains photographs and records of such support
until the documentation has been returned to TSD. If the material
is not ieturnedafter a reasonable time, the requester is reminded
of the outstal:Iding documentation.
r'
I ' "...,
I /; ,'. / . ..•;/~_ .
o
..,,( (/ .. ..i/ ·.""";1

"'.~. "'i':
.. _....;.. ~. ,-~ ~ :..: ~
. I . : , L /.. ·
Attachment .. Sidney;.Gottlieb
D'istribution: '. Chief
o &. I - Addressee,w/att Technical Services Division
OOZ1.6
Do c i.l.l:ric~11t. s, d i :-;;:; 1..11. s e, (; 011 C t~' ~..~.J-~( l·l._~T'lt l:3.e "vic e s, s e <::t" et Y'VJ~ 1ti ng 1
f:_:;ll.; S Ct)Ul1te i.~ 1r .. ;... .;.:~'r- g c=rl(: .l. (,::!.:,j CG1..}.]~.. tr~'J: ~~'':: t-: ()~:~3.g e cc·\~:t":S C s
3..TJ,j f~ C. ~ls)
1"la'v'e be~ll fUl"llisl1E'd to 3.11 iJ1L.c;11ig(::e.c;; L:l~lTl\:;;11tS of t11~ !.)'~r~;:1.1.. t.ll1cllt

of Defense and certain elernents of the Special Forces. All requests
are coordinated ~vi th the FI Departrncntal Coordi.1,-ation Group at
Headquartel"s and \'.rtth the Chief of Shtions o"\ce:.."seas. In turn
these elements fUJ..-:ni:::;hed TSD \~'ith exernplars of foreign identities
documents, foreign cachets, foreign intelli.gence secret \vriting
systems, foreign intelligence .concealment devices. Selected
auc~.io r€:quireInents have been.furnished overseas for CI -type
cases.
Federal Bureau of In-v"estigation
At the request of the FB(we cooperate with the Bur~au

in a fe"\v audio.. 5ur"\-eillance operations against sensitive foreign
targets' iJ:). iheUnited States.
Bu:;:-eau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs
Beacons~ cameras~
audio and telephone devices for
ove:"seas operatiol1s, identity docUly,ents, car-trailing devices,
SRAC, flaps and seals and training of selected personnel
responsible for use thereof has been furnished this Bureau.
All requirements are sent to DDO/NARCOG for coordination
with area divisions and for action by TSD if appropriate.
Requests overseas are coordinated with the COS or his
designee before action by TSD is taken.
lInmigration and Naturalization
CI analyses of foreign passports and visas, guidance in

developing taInperproof alien registration cards, I I
I Ihave been furnished the SerVlce. Requests
are forwarded directly to TSD for coordination within TSD if
technical, with the FI DepartInental Coordination Group Hoper-
ational.
......
00;21.7
j),;':::artlnerJ!;
___ .. J _ of
_ _.. __ _. ,~:c_
S:a
rec:cJ~~·:·j ,-:·~.l .s:'-:·'-'i~~1·.: ~ .:~ :~·:_,.iJ;;.n:·:~ c::) dr;\;-.:;!.o.r1n.g ~l 11(:\\,t. rJr!i~·I.; ,i

~···:~·'·~.<:.~i J?d.:::;·:;·l)o:;,·t, ;.. ,.' J~;,::3 (if .~()r~-;~~:l :-··~·~-;J..}l:;1.:·S, l~::·~L· -;~.II·::lt);.i!~g
:1]; ..1 ~:'c..; 1- S 01'::11 (:1 ] c i.~ ::: ~ \'} 'J.'~) (~) :'~ t· <:C: 11 S)
r .:"; :~L::.~: ~.~:; S ;7.,'~ (j r s 1~a \:.~ 1) c e'll
£()
:3 ~i. ~')~::li eLl tl) c St."J. ~:e D':·l).:~.:r 1- ::1·1C:llt. ITl a c.] (} i. t1.011 c_:n 3.1 y s c S ;:,:n d
''':'~posure of
bla ck L::tt':':l" l)PE.::,·:·\Hons ;:-,.;,;c:inst the United States
:". b:r. 0':::' dar e r.n ~.d ~ . _~\ 11 g l' ~"I rj}:_!.~. C S i:,; i-:;; ~ J: C rl1. :.::~:.t s ;?r l; f O:r ~:'''c_l'''(l(; d
to J." S D for [U.l" t.};.,-:: r {: :)0 r (~~:.;':: .:~~. :)11 ""~:! : i,.: 1 ~ }le j)~ ~,~:,,}. s 1. \.)l"!. :,C11 e
!
Departnient of S~.d:,~ {\.i1"nish~s ':::·-:;~::2L:.rs of .foreign i:-',:lssLiorts.

foreign visas and in lh~ f'ast pas sports on a priority basi s.
Postal Servi.ce
The Office of Chief Postal Inspedor has had select~d

personnel attend basic surveillance photographic courses. has
been furnished foreign postal information and has been the r
recipient of letter bOlnb2.nalyse s. furnished I I
I Itypewriter analyses. Reql.liren1ents are coordinated with
the DDO and-DDO/EA. The Post Office has furnished TSD
with exempl~rs of letter bombs ~nd I
IWe al~o have
----:=alin'l.:a'i"'i"r1'ro;anfl'l.:::>ad."e>'im'nle5"ni'rT't~'\\'\',,.,. 1"'Tt!'l'nlTL.Tllnc"--lP"'TO"'-S~L.OTU"'1lT'11nc"'e..---n\.. o-'-'e""""'x""'an l'T!T111r.,T1!eP"""::,'i n d r e 1 n s e r t . \.
a low volume of certain foreign mail arriving in the United States.
Secret Service
Gate passes. security passes. passes for Presidential

campaign•. emblerns for Presidential vehicles; a secure ID
photo
, systeul
.
have been furnished this Ser·vi.ce. Blanket. approval
for graphics support has been granted to the Deputy Director for
'Operations. In each case TSD requests approval from the DDO.
u. S. Agency for Internationa~ Development
We furnish instructors to a USAID-s onsored Technical
- Investigation Course (Counter Terror) at
- 2 -
0021.8
(.
StatiOJ11~ry, speclal rn.':;J1lOranrla, nlolds of the Gr,~at

~3r;rll lla \.~~ 1)(; en f\} rrd.:.; 11 (~d. t}l ('; ~~ 0 c i 2..1 Sec J:t"~t;tr)T. 1.'lj t~ J='i~ ~)l.l t)r
l)i .r e eto 1- f 01'" (J l) c~:c 2. t:~ i) 11 S i:J ~ .~:.~~) J.- 1. ~ i-; d of ~.b.(::~; e x t;Ci·(:.l :;,:" f; 1·.C,\'} 1) t s •
Police Respresenting. i,Vashington, ArlinKlon, Fairfa~ and

Alexandria
During the pe:dod 1968 - 1969 a series of dass.~s

reflecting basic and surveillance photography, basic audio,
locks and picks,' countersabotage and surreptitious entry
were given t.o selected rnem.bers fron~ the abovE: ITlentioned
cities. Overall training was approved by the Director of
Centeral Intelligence and in turn validation was required f01;
each course froIn the Director of Security.
-'.
60219
.. I
...r .~
:. J . '. '( ...... ~- . ~ _: ...-. --
.....
., ....
"
":.) .,'; I
.... - •. _.. . _.. ... .: -,- _. -'" "'. - :~_. _..
.-. . .: 1
3.
4.
5.
6.
J----+----'.
1 ~
7.
_1'0.:- tt~t:at'
-
8..
. ~;1U,h\.I-' "'~'
-~ to
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
00220
15.
fORM
3-62 61 0 uSior:.~~~us 0 SECRET o CQtlFIDENTIAL o INTERNAL
r.rSD ]1303 11;J.d a close +·.-;:/or;:iI1g tIle FBI c···.·(;l~
:cc.lati t);1:311ip \\litll
tl1.e p~.st [(;\-V ycal."s. "J"~1(: }.~·· ..;.:·I is tIle C'll1)' ()rg2nj:.:~;~til)11 t"tl2.t
I:as
been fully briefed on. TSD (;.udio tl~chniqucs z","~1d l":'luiprncnt. The
following are situations where TSD equipment and guidance ",!ere
involved in operations:
'.
0022.:1
. • i:
•
- 2 -
0022Z
-
r ~",~:.:; .. ,
~.,
,., ~'l
··,;;)D,::;:o U33·73
8 ;~jY 1073
EXGcu~ive Offic~r
SUBJECT: Contacts with Dc;nestic Police Organizations
1. In Dec.~er 1963, July 1969 ~nd December 1970, SDB

provided basic countersabotage familiarization training for
selected members of the Washington metropolitan area police
departments. The training vlas given at the Fairfax County
police pistol and rifle range.' Authorization for the train-
ing came from DDP and Chi~f, Office of Security.
2 •. On occasion during the past fe\v years, under the

auspices of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration of
the Department of Justice and ''lith the approval of CI Staff
and' Off5.ce of. Sec-uri ty, SUB provided t:raining and familiari-
zation to police officers of several domestic police
depar~uents in the uses of the Explosives Residue Detection
Technique and Trace Me~als Detection Technique. These tech-
niques had been declassified and are ·currently available to
the law enforcement community. The National Bomb Data Center
pUblishes periodic g-uidance in their uses '.
3. In order to augment the SDB mission responsibilities

in.the field of countersabotage and counterterror,SDB offi-
cers have in the past two years visited, under appropriate
covers, the explosives disposal units of the New York City
police department, Dade County (Miw~i) Florida Dept. and the
Los Angeles Police Dept. Also, in Harch 1973, two SDB offi-
cers attended ·.the Explosives' and Ordnance Disposal Conference
in Sacramento, California, sponsored by LEAA~ When the
recent letter bomb menace began in September 1972, our liaison
with the NYCPD bomb squad paid off in that we had complete in-
formation on letter bomb construction in hours, 'enabling the
-?\gency to make worldwide disseminatio 'thin a da '
00223
~:"
::'l (;'
.•~ .. ...
,IiI :'.dd.itJc Jl 'tt) r}ri.11t.~_n~.~ ( I f 1::\.!.I!C·1..1~:'5 r~~':'3:~~C~S nn.d

I
i (1::: ft t jN f it..; ~1 t:~ ~.; 11 (~.;:~ 1.) 1 (:l:1~3; '.; ,~:).}) : ,"' -: ~~ (11 ~.::!') ~::' :'ll:·l).1 i (.(\ -~;: e
SeC:l"et Si·;;j.~¥. / 5.c-o \\~it11 :·.~:(}~:·!O 1.J.8. (~1 ~.;~~3 <:O(;i_:'··~:':-;1.M;_;.tt:lC:i1;
00224
r. 'f;':0 r.1.·:··~~,t ~~(:;;:~"_;lt of ·::t:(:JtJ~j( ;·:1 ·L·_,·a;;·:·~1·~~1·1:y ·r}·.·."!~·1~.:~jJ ~~r~~;·!c.!l
~\·~~.:5 '-, ·':~~".!; ... c·;.e(l (·!1.;r~i:6 :_.~!(~ ·i-''-~·l.'~l.. ;.l '/ Oct01JOI" - 26 >~·'~.I:.;:~0.\':I·
J..~~68. 'fhc ~F(Jll.c··,·,'Jn.g s~:~:\:l:1tlj(: ,'?l(l ::·_:~)jc:(:t$ :·.-,~:r·(~ ~.~>~c:!:l i l l
the training of si.x J:<:.1,)i::-"·S (;f tLc ~;cJC{(:POJ.i..t;ii1 Police
Ji.::pa rtr'(;H t.
A. 7-J.8 October - Surj'cptitf~us Entry

(~I: .. i."L(~j'1.t 0:[ ~3;.:1)j c:ct ~_::.~ ·~LL1.t:
1. Familiarization and identity of American locks.

2. Hethod of ;i l 2.nipulaticm of locks.
3. Methods and tec;miques of concuct ing Su:crepti-

tious Entry Survey.
B. 21-29 October - Photo Surveillance
Content of Subject taught:
·1. Familiarization with cameras: Pentsx Spotmatic,
Leica, Nikon F, Robot and Polaroid.
2. Lens, telephoto and wide angle.
3. Exposure Meter, Tripod~; Bowum, etc.
4. Film, film, processing and print processing.
5. Document copy exercises.
6. Night Photography and night exercises~
7. TV Surveillance.
C. 18-23 November - Audio Surveillance
Content of Subject taught:
1. Microphones, wire impedances and line amplifiers.
(Shure MC-30, SennheiserMM-22, RCA - BK - 6B and
RCA BK-12a all commercially available)
2. RF commercial transmitter. (Research Products,
Tracer Inc., Scientific Research Corp.)
00225
.~ . "" t •.• ~ , .... ~_., • t." ; 7 .i. :.. I. /~ ;.'. d (~" . ,. i;, I. .. ';l-\.{
" ·.<.1 >!'.r .. ,.;. f.] :., . ,"t •. t] 1 \.. ';' .i.-"::\~ t ~"t;l J.)t.)
:f'c ~_r·'l·!~.' . '.;~

, . ,
~':{l:jC;l
5• RC: l ~ ,~: l' I ! :.. : J ::; (/I.::F:c:~\:-COl-2 Ste:reo, ~~.~~; .;·:rc ·r-.~04
~·:c·";a, :';;,:.:1' ~'OGOL, all cCF:J:KJ:ci.ally ()b,:."i;]:;.".:.)].~).
,
t) •
D. 24-26 r;ovc;.~ber - Opcratic!"lal ProbL;i!l <2nd Exercise

1. This problem entailed an operational exercise
<lBaiiist th:cce of our S."fc·st:l.es. fhe Si':-;l(;::'-;lts h2.d to
-:'·,.·.c-'.'ey, l·._·.·.·lS~_.......,c;11d '·,CO'L··'····:·--,
...;~ 1: '-'" - ~t1'.i-'.:,e lnc";""l'L'i"',';1s 1j<:;ljO'
t. _ _ V ~.I. oJ...- .::> '~Uj-rc""I)'L"I'··
__ . . . . ..... _4 -- .-. -- _. ~ .J ..... 1.:
tious entry, photography and ~udio surveillance.

,- 2~. All these safesites two a artments inl I
~ -.~~nd
one on have been
turned back to Agency "ca ~S La Le an .ave sInce t.hen
been term ina ted. FOf.i:1~ll cl as s ins true t ion \, as conducted
at 1 _
II. After this first NPD group other police departments

personnel trained using the identical safe sites and
esploying the same s~bject matter and commercial equip-
ment as indicated above were taught on the folloi,'ing dates.
The Fairfax Police Department and Arlington Police Depart-
ment. Date - 21 October - 10 December 1968. Six officers,
4 from APD and 2 from FPD.
III. In 1969 additional officers from the Metropolitan Police

Department, Fairfax Police Department and Arlington Police
Department received identifical training as that stated
abo!e: .In total 24 police officers were trained in our
facllltles.
00226
, i
1 ·.Y J " ~ .. 1
~ ....
-. ' -.• "..' ., ~ I
.. ';"':
i);' ().~~.D
s.
6. ;"/
, '-.)
-.
"
-.. -\.. ........
,-' .. ), '-' '\ ~'
8. ,
.'
---'
9. -:.:" .. "- .,-\.. : .. '- "-- .---_ .. .:... ..
1, .. '-.. . ..:.
10. _."----
l .-.. -
~ ~; --C .
11.
12.
13.
u.
00227 '"
15.
FORM
3-62 o CONFIDENTIAL o INTERNAL
USE ONLY tj UNCLASSIFIED'
LQ D ~ J. ::i 28 - 73
:__ ,:",~., .~L·~):'.I rc~~.: -;~~.~:-·::tl ·')j.·fC·t:·~".(·.c ~~('~l." Sc·i .....: ,...:; ~··.~ ..:11
}~ t:; t~. :":.:' <.:: J_ G t~'Y
SUBJECT Repeated Survey of ORD ror Ncn-

Fore~'1n
- G·" Tnt(~'}li00n(-e
- _. . ... ....- - _.. ... Ac·tivities
-~ ~
The 7 May survey has been repeated and refined

with respect to all ORD services or dealings with
other agencies on domestic, non-foreign matteI'S. In
additi6n, this report covers all our- activities deal-
1 60 .-i .... 11 +he rc.s'-a---11
.1 \\'_t.. ,-_ ;_-.tJ.C ..
, '''Id
c..L (~t=.\re'o-·)·-;""nt
1_ '_'. 1 J: . , v... of l·n ..... "'ll;"cn-e
_ . !..Li: ..__ .:..~~-:_t . . . · J•
e('lL.:lj?Dent Ior ~~OTeJ.gn l;se ;,,-nlCll Eas 0(':811 ceste d III

. r"'· ,. , 1- . 1 ....
the United States and might. have collected dCoJi1estic

information. Again, each-member of ORD available
today was asked either directly or-through his super-
VIsor to provl~a tle
• 1 aoove
":1 ' requeste d 'InIorrnatlon,
r •
Khether he was directly involved or not. ~e have

used all diligence to search our records available
to us during' thiS 'time period to ensure this is a
complete and factual list.
I ~ayre
3":1'" eIlS I.
Director of Research & Development
Attachments:
1 Contacts with Other
Government Agencies
2 - Domestic Tests
oozza
CONTACTS WITH OTHER U.S. GOVER~~ENT AGENCIES lffiICH
COULD OR HAVE RESULTED IN USE OF CIA-DEVELOPED "-; ..
. TECHNOLOGY IN ADDRESSING DOMESTIC PROBLEMS
Executive Office of the President

ORD represents DD/S&T on the R&D Sub-Committee
of the Cabinet Conunittee for International Narcotics
".Control that is concerned with research support of
"the narcotics control problem.
(Dr. Leonard Laster, OST)
Office of Teleco~~unications Policy

Techriical surVeill~nce countermeasures and
physic2_l security inforrn2.tion \·...c .5 exchanged \{ith
thenl.
Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (~NDDL
Techniques and equipnent for naviga. tior~ and

tracking was discussed with BNDD.
IRNljD)
I
1£1,'; LI Jl)
w::: r c rH' 0 C C 5 5 c: (1 tn :lit"tIl ro':(: their

The' 50 1.'0('>,' CJ ~ t ~-l. t (:1. i! c: :.~ \"t- c.~ ~.~ it t"t:-:: "-!. U ~'.;- i:..
":::;
I BNOO)
------------ .,
002.2[3
I
-
':'.,~ :~~.) j'.:.t.,·r: (~!': ~.~ ~·;·.C.1·~; ":.;;, 1~11 (·t. ~·...;.r iJ. ~3. (-.;. ~.-:,. '; ~:'.'''·.··:·jlt :~ .~~:::~·I i': 1 .:~;
,;ki.(·h C:',;.l:t.d ',:1' ;'>'\'0 :~":>'.,dLCd ,;:11.:50 of cr.\.-
"il .... ",," ~:t 1 e- (1 '.! '..' . ~. ~ ~
"j:. !. ( , ,,~~,
,':Jn. '\ '.~" 1:~. '... :' .~; .~ :; 1 .~ Dc :~:'; :. :., S or:..~. l::'
),.. .;
j~ ":' l~ ;.: i ;~ ~l ; -
.• C' ~'I ,', 1

UJ )
( l. J • • l.
:":]-;DD ',:;:::S gi.Y~n '.1?~"_'T·!2-:,,»::.:l ~n U;o f.:,] 1. of 1972

to :c,:'c(':j\-e :C!""'L,!):~::>ls 'f}~\:,] .\::rl"'r:;'I~C, Inc., C(~i'.\>:;:':'ling
":'I
(,...
'p :' {~ .... 1-- I'"
.. ''.1 ..... 0 _ "'-'J..J_... ~
r .r~ .~. (~C'
:.~ I";" 1 ~ _J,..,(•.. ..... -) ~...
~_l~( J.
:-~ ..•., ,-,",! ',;,,-,,1 -~~ t"\ r (~; ~~~ t)
\."<_ .. ;"·'-·"'i~·\
I'"
.J- •.., ."' • •
I I
L..-
fNDDJ
-----l
USIB Techriic~l Surveillance Countermeasure~ Committee

Continuing contacts were maintained with the
intelligence cOffiiilUni ty rega rding technical surveillance
countermeasurs and physical security. This exchange
of information, reports,·and equipment has been con-
ducted under the auspices of USIB TSCC and involves
State, FBI~ Secret S~rvice, NSA, DIA, Army, AF, and
Navy.
State Department
Two contracts for development of countermeasures
techn~ques \verefunded j ointlY\oJi th the State Department.
00230
",
S{):::e i ) f -:::11) .:\r:c.~ T.:: 1:-:")·,.. ~.:.t(:1.·~.,.~'5, ,:;. ~.:~. ~ S::.:~;-<::.:~·:~~.~~11
~~i'\rerJ.. . {~t··_~j.:.~:..~t·or),.., :.=:.1'"(; ~~(':~I;\)·.Ct:C(.l ;)}r t.:Xl\ to t~'~'veI(~l)
" nue I"lae
ra d 10 1 samp 1°lUg an d aetect10n ' . ,.
tecnn1ques an d
devices. These Laboratories have used sampling
techniques developed for CIA to :neasure cems nuclear
plant r0J.':::3.50S.
(Mr. B. Benson, AEC)

At the request of.AEC Security Officer, Mr. Richard
Cowan, the walls of the office of the Chairman of the
ABC (then Mr. S~hlesinger) were X-rayed. The operation
occurred ,oj1e evening and \','as an attempt to resolve some
anomalies created by the us-e of the 1
I. 1 '-----------
(Mr. Richard Cowan, AEC)
Law Enforcement Assi~tance Agency (LEAA)

Reports and information about the ORD-developed
Adhesivc-.Restraint, Non-Lethal Incapacitation System
were made available to Depal·t!nent of Justice, LEAA in
August 1972. If they developed the sys~em, it would
be used for civilian crowd and riot' control.
(Mr. Les Schubin, LEAA)
Technical surveillance countermeasures and physical
securi ty information '\'ere exchanged ,'lith LEAA.
I- - - - - - -
3
0023:1
'.;
-
(~':<;1. i ;.; C 1 S :.~:; .:~ '1 l.J;':. \':'f' if 5. 4 (~~:. '.: '-' •. :"1. i'~ ',:'i .... :l,-'C
..
.~\~ >.~ ":.~
.
CJ CS
l'.11:i (:.-J1 (~C:ij ~:.tl !)1· I::.~ \-t,; :~C:S:,i1. t,:~~(l r~ !J~~(). ofl.:L\-
T; L...v~ (~.l C l' <: d. r~: ("} :.~".~, () 1. ,] ~~.}.. ': ~1 ~\i ~ :·.~,:C :..::, s s i .il,g T)~);7. C'~ t ',~. (:
. P nJDJ',"JiS
~~>~:::Yj :~.u.£l
"'~'J
"-------1..
1 J. 5 . """':
.) '.... 1, .'..L"Y
:::15~S"'J~7'S"""'t~J"""., r"'.l---"-':1.~"",,().~. ~~~\.l
0
'~'''';''Jj
\. ...
J;:1. ;i: ~~ ~1 g' ·tll e

!... '. _
i:r
J -,d
'- "'0
L
:~':~t~ 'd·
'1"""""<:i;"'V
.....'. ",. *.J• .... _ .. J.. .J
1; .t' t):; j' (t ;:1 :::_11 d
1.'.
•.•• \_. ,~,
i •• ,..-11 t
n"''''''-'','',-n'''',:
......
(: '1.' £;~: 11 i::: rl t i 0 II

. ...
in 2ntlCJ.patlon O'f "U1C "1
8S·CC:D .. " ' i tO·
JSE,:1Ctl: ' "(He nc\-! 1
<tl:iJg
enforcement administration. The J:equest for his services
was made byl I thi Agency's Narcotics Coordi-
___ tor. . .j\J'r. j
1)'1"" . _..,:) _... "c,~, .. (i ':)'.'"' ·;'-'(~-l'.""t
trl1~.( L..t .... ;I'.".d r:l!~;g-J.'pd
....
'.,..t .. :J J-he
__ .' __ .. ~ • _ lJ _ '- ~ ~~- ,~ ~...... L. ...
detailing tJHou)i;n ,\,r. Co 1;. y • I

- ...J
Customs/Treasury Del?_~T:tII!~!.!!
Technica~ discussions were held ~ith Customs relating
to detecting illici t night.time aircraft intrusions over
the U.S.-Mexi6~ border.
(i'.r
~~ "
.;·Jar t 1fi
. Pera, Customs)
Alc6hol& Tobatco'~,x Div/IRS

About five years ago, assistance '.. . as.re.quested in
domest.icsearch of Hmoonsh:ne" stills using CIA infrared
scanners. This was turned. down.
Secret Service
We have had numerous discussions with ~heSecret

Service' regarding navigation and tracking techniques
and equipment.
00232
:: tJ.B.J ; :(~~r : . (~;) ~4l t. o).~ 1: S ~,.t.: :.';1 (J '( ;1 c::C 1J. IS.
... r (;".-'
t•. "! ':. ;.~ (: [-1.t- i\~~~ (: 1: t.: '~. (~ s
:·ni.5.•..: h ("'1 1 <1 01' i;:;\'-o' J~;::·;dJt·';d· Tn Usc of Cl.A-

l)c:\'r'· j '..''i°,:i.i;C! rl .. :l.·~··-~:;)J.~:'h)r j i1 ~:\~:;(1·,··(:ssi.1lg T:t:'t;1(;st1.C
, )?:.. . .C, 1).1. '... ,l S
1:' , , (~'
.l (; U ~ 1.
••- __•.~_ •.~
<1.1_•. \ r·i.. n.~ l
J~ \
__
J. ; : .,
~.'" - ... () ,1.-.-"...J'"'t"._'
•... _" ~~ l': ;'.1_)
\ •••.. -- .• r .':: ::,. "')
l" _...''\.
,.. ,..,--_. _._...,__.-- .•
The :ccsults of (;ur 'r('~i;t;J"ch ''''-')Tk in the detection

of }i·:I~t0.ls I I":,"e:ce . r·:-i-:,,:;;ttt:·d to 1;1\;\ EG1' pGs:::5 !:;1·,:,: u:;o
in the d etc=-·(=:~:r(=-:t-:-Q-:-n----=o f h i j e.c:}: e :c 1,' '':- ;:'. p c ~ 105 •
'At the request of ORD, OCS assigned 'a'stafftechnician

to under·take to write a computeT program for the . Wisswesser
Line Notation (W'LN) chemical notation method. ··This ,-mrk h"as
donci in coop~ration with NIH.
(Ms •. Conivei, NIH)
Arms Co.ntrol and D~_~~.Tma!T~:!lt_Agency_.C:~CD!.l

1I0RDmet frequently ,\vith' ACDA personnel in order
to~ture ORD r s -~l~/CW reseal~ch programs to support
ACDA needs.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Technical information relating to detection of

radio nuclides in the environment was exchanged with
them.
(Mr ~ ,Charles Weaver , EPA)
5
00233
-'.
I
::?:·'?Jr:(~·i': (~\~<.tt;::l"'-;-S ::·i.';·11 ():·:··~i" 1J .S. (~,:~;'t~ j-:"; "";",:"::It ':~'~·:':;~'(:·;.<·s
1;-h i ch CI:·-.l:'.d '.'1' if;;Y'e ~ •.~sl);.tc;d In r::c ,,-,'f ·C1A-
J) ~.:.\;'. (.~ ] ;:'~'l c·.J tr c' <}': ;~1 C }. ~.# ~:.?)r :j.i1 :\'.1 (3:( :; . ~ S 'j ; -: g ~ c; ": (.~ S t 1. t:
Pi:' \) '.., J c ,;s
'
'T e c h n :1. cal d .1. S •• : ;.l. S 5 1. 0 n 5 i~ C J. C\ t 5ng t 0 1J '.3 :; j"1 g IRs C': n II ·i. :1 g
to dci:ect ·u;1.i]erg·.;:-::1. ;lcl fL:cs Ll a
cqi.J:i.i:):~(;!lt 1 S;3::Li.t<:L·.Cy :: ",td
fill have Leen cc~ductcd.
(Mr. Gene James, EPA)
1_-
At their request, we described~Imagery Enhancement
t€:chniques ge.rmane to removing distortions from some
photography. they had on an alleged bank robber. Request
for specific support in processing the imagerY.i-las . tUTned
d01. .,n.
Secret Service
FBI .
.lJ:"S". Customs
. .I I tot~l contact .with oth7r agencies
In terrnsof assIstancewlth domestIC operatIons hasbe~n
'in. the field, of audio sl..lrveillance cOJ_mtermeasures, anti-
hijacking, or drugs. - .
". (Mr. Robert Burnell, SS)
(Mr. Thomas Allen, FBI)
(Mr. Martin Fera, Customs)
L-----I
. "NASA and USDA I---.,---------.,-----r===========;----
We have an on- QoinQ' nroQ'ram. Ito
I I
Iror earl:n resources assessments.
'---,,--------------' -----------
(Mr: William Ruble, USDA)
{Mr. Leonard Jaffe, NASA}
(General Smart)
6 00234
/
";',:, .~: .:......! ;: c~ l' : (' '..>- t ·i~:. C..;. S IJ. S. -( \; \- .'~:-:, ;" ~.~ :.::~ .(: .t. ~'.'~ 1... i"; (', i t~-S
.; \" j ~'P Jl{~ I" ~.~ (: 'f
·,.·~).~l·.11 t-';,.. ;·~:l\.l !.~ ....r !::: .. ,.~~
:~..:-.'~:,iil·~:.~:(l J;l ~!:~.~e ()J~ (~I~-\-
~~ 1_' -": ..:: 1'.. i j ::.; ct '.;; "._ (~.l·: .,: c J. l~: t~ y .1. ·]1 ./:. (~.~. J~ C·"~ :; .\. r: .'~.; .~- '::. c ~~ tic
·I.~ ..•. \ J1) 1 ..-". ,'; s
l':r-C':)csc-d Use of X·'\SA ERTS Sat.ellite

.
( _ll{;[.t~r,·)r
.... v - .... - 1~cOc·'~~lJl~Jl
t._ -
-.J'. __ .c. 0..-. _'.
. .
... _._.~ •• • -1-_ _.•- •. _
,
• • ~' ••• ". __• __ ~ •• _"" •• _ ••..• _ -... •••..• ....-,-~_ .••• ~--
"""lln
.1 ' .•: ; -• • ' . .
', ..,.
..J (" ~F'-r,F'r)
~_ L . .....l
I",'
'j'1,. .,
•.. J1""" """("'''''''''
.'.5 ..·:....... ) i,-
...;) ,-·····,·."·:t-·l-.;'lcr"
J,:'l.,...·J.: ... .1::;. ':',','(,''',)<:r.I]
0·1" '-1.1' -r"'I" '~Tl ':>YY·''''''~-.l·-
l.. . \.. J..
'-r· ..
menta 1 pl"ogr'iiTI to al'd lJl . cstlli,2.tJ.ng

., , S ' •
w ••• w .......• ..... '--, '."-
tHe OVJ.i::t i-:neat

. crop. A part of the information would be obtained from
a satellite J.(~LF!chcd for otb:::r an'nounced fll-'}graJJs. Ground-
·...t.. ·,,,,··h
... {l'~ta "
':..4 ' - t·' i__ ].l_ l'e (.. ,)"11c·-··'''·1
(,.L (, C L C <. /)11'
'.' .. ~,10
• ... 1"1 ~t-,.·':'Cl·':·-·'lTl
~....
J.. .1. "'- '---'-''"'1)S
• .. '_ -'.L.
__ •.. .. l _ .... 1 0(0.4 .. '1.- J.
'U. S. Department of Agriculture and Bureau' 'of 'Narcot:ics

~E-a ~an..zerolLs D.!·ugs
CIA has requested the establishment of a t"lO-acre

plot of opium poppies at a USDA research site in Washington
state, to be used for tests of phbto-recognition of opium
poppies •.
I-----------------~----,-,-------------
'A~my) Militar.:f,polic:e ~geI!~y~_!t~~ordon

-Alr Force, at lce of t e.Inspector ITe:isyal
··.Army, Offlce o-rl'ro'vost Marshall General
t. We have exchanged tec.hnicalsurveil1ancecounte"L--
measures and physical security information with them.
u. S.·
Army
Rocky Moun·tain ArsenaT, Nel'rport' Army Amm'l'ni t'io'n Plant,
Toelle Ordnance Depot
Do"RD tested environmental samples from testing,

storage· and production facilities in the U.S •
,"
.1 _ -
00235
I
.. ~" .
., " ; : '.,:~ ,).: ~ l: 'i' : (~\_I.: \ f.;': c."1 S !:,r i 1:.]1 t.~ .:. :: \."; r i J • S. !~ C"\' '.'; f .. ~-.'" ~_. ~: 1~ .."\ ."j i.". ~1 (: ~7_ c. s
".-'. ·.':·1~-!.CJl r.~'l···::.1.l1 i}l' I1~Y'e ·F(:';~.IJ·i(:J I~l tJ~~·0 --):f t:r;\-
;)(.·~··i:·~ l,j~~.~··(1 ;.I·._t~~~~loJ..Oti)r j}l ~\:1 'J. -.:~.:.~~5~·j.~ :'i}:.-;I:·st:it:
r- ]. I) b 1. :;j S
l~.:~~._~~.!·Ji!Y_L_:~_~l.s.\~··~·_~~'?i, l.:\E..~~~:: !:. ~~.J:.

_ _-----lDORD L,';1.J ,n- :L; S <c..;' ':;~!.S CS >:.."- ~. ::1 :C i (~l d. t (; s 1_ 5. "(~.g
1' - - - - -
U.S. Coast Guard

About six years 2.go, CIA infrared equipment was
made available for USCG tests to evaluate IR as a means
for night search of life boats.
(then-Lt. James McIntosh, USCG)
San Mateo County Sheriff's' Office

ORD conducted polygraph tests on ,all applicants.
Polygraph security findings were compared with the
Sheriff's own security findings.
(Sheriff)
A study was made on con-men techniques and assess-
ment methods in 1967-68.
(Sheriff)
".
8 00236
....~ .....
/
:.~:: ,~.',;: (:]': ::=; ~it 5 t
r'i~~~" 'j :: I;, J1 f]-i:;; t:;l~1). ~~. (' '_ ~ < ',-:":>:I:! ~ t .~::; 1,.. ·.~1t>~>~~S
,~\
I I >"!~'f 1:.11 C:(:i.:,:r t1 ()1~ 1:::-'./{; 1~c:;~:1l"t··{.1 T 1 l.r~,,-~ ("f (;I:\-

" .,!
:~ ...., 1:',( .. 11 :T',.:·cJ.~no!.I;~ .: .)r· j}l .':.~.::~·~.,. : .... :.;··!.:1~ }~~~::~:~'.·:~··;:~ic
"'-.' ,) 11! ' ·~S
00237
/ , • <'. ~ ", :
......:.. "SfGt~~~; •. ""-.

..... ,..... ' : _. ..
. ,.,
.DOMESTIC TESTS FOR

AGENCY RESEARCH AND DEVELOP~ffiNT EFFORTS.
1. As a normal part of ORn's efforts in the

research and development of equipment and techniques
fdr Ag~nct·a~plication~·in foreign intelligence, we
conduct experiments and tests in the United States.
·J~n,
;'.
Clearly, the design and development of our intelli- ~: ~
gence equipments can be done more eConomically and i.; ii,,~·-·
more securely in this country. Although most of

"the tests of our R&D equipments are performed in ~
·closed laboratories or. in secure areas simulating
the foreign environment, some of the tests and experi-
ments,ofnecessity,~eve~ldomestic information.
2. A review of the surveillance equipment or

·techniques which have at some· time or other been
exposed to domestic te~ting is as follows:
a. Laser Probe - About 1967, the laser
probe· de\lelope-dlry--ORD was tested by TSD in
San Francisco under·very close·ly controlled
conditions. The ORn Projec.tOff-icer witnessed
portions of the test: ..• Recordings that '.. ere··
ma:de of laseT prbbe;output were 'carefully
controlled as cla~sified material and it is
beIievedthat the·,tapes have long since been
destroyed ~;~ ..
ermit
e-
III t creep t s \1erc
i--..---~~_--.J
ati~ ~ere dcstroyedsevcral
002.-38··
:) :.:.~." .':I.:T: ))c::: c;:-;: t;. c":'" :.' t s f,)[ ... ~.) . , , _ / ;~ c:·;:>~, !(~h:.:~·\l
:J c:\- (~ ]. j"; i~' :;'. ~'",; i~ ~'::( J:" U OJ." t s
':' .'.
r... • . '.i.' t.·.·.•• 'l.,.. r.,

.....
j ....' '• •••.•••...• ' •• ~
~_._,...., 'J ) J{_• ·f·
-'.
~., ..:- ..:
•• t _t 0".
""1
\.J r:: -'-l-: ':.". _ (T~... 'l.r
I..) ) r
_ \
.'
II'JG.ny of these are patterned
L..-a~I-'·
+-".,...."T-,--""·.,....ll...,..e~IJ~·l:'~-<:-}>-·~·-!----'~·n
.- '- '; . ',' : u. - : ' ::, L Cll
" 11 d , . .fO'I'
c; .. .
"]1
L
is
__ •
....", c:; OJ1
1 ':'<.l. _ '_ .
Ilmltcd ~onltorlng to test the 0peratl0n of
intercept e uiJBent in thc United States is
planned •.
Message content 1S
L..--.---n.,....o-,----.~1-n-.t-e-r,..-e-s----.-t-a-n---.--.......,.....,,----Jn 0
t be r ecorde d • Over - .
seas testing is planned at a ~ubsequ~nt date.
To date,<:some domestic testing of this concept·
has been carried out at the contrac:tor'splant
No recordings have been made of such data. ~. Ex'-
tremelybrief tests exercising u.S. and foreign
telepnone'systems I
~ ave been r;c""ao:>:-.;r""l~e"'a;:,-·"'-"·""o:"uO'ft~t~o"'.~\iiTT°e"r"""l""'ff",yrr~1'l"nri""'i";L"Ft""1""'a"I-'------
-,c.....o""n..c,......,..ep=·""'t-..'s.·The duratlon of testlng \\'as less .
;than one-half hour •
.... d.·~.-Other Sensor Testing - Examples of
engineering development test's of special'sensors'
\{i thIn th~United States include and'
n a ese cases, ~ e
testing has been used for engineering develop~
mentand the content has been restricted to
dissemination to those in Government involved
with the engineering de~ign. .
.'''.
~~T
'\t:...~ 00239
! ", ... ~ .. ,
• -'. ~ •. -~.-!.....;
!.- ::l·t·~.: 'j."':,~,::'" ts f"(.'l'> ~'~'. ~.~I>rl·:Y ,1' ~ :.: ... :~ .:..-C~l.
J)L·~.. -(~;·; .:-....::;.; t .'!.~:C i~n·r·i·' $
" ·· . . '1
. ....::..• ,.'"l'.~",...;;"·,·"f"\ :"""\'., ....••.: 1'1 ~··~·1·
..,.~.~ .. _.l:.,~; .:,.Ll,., .... _.i~·~. L •.,
.~.!. :·-;_;·_1·~~·••.,,~· __
- - -
, ··:-l.:.~. •. ,:·~·r. ,~··L·:~.
..... - .• -::-
-
. •·' ..1
I t.L")_
......:-.; .. ,," \.- "."-"",,1
....'," ',"". u..1'· . . \. I .r,.·I'
,;::_:. ·· .
.::J
'I... ,J~:....t
"5
Q
·····"0
.
. .tl.:>
a
(.
~.\
""':'l"Ji)1'c
. J..
'. •. _
'. ·,.1·····
:\ toOl';" (.: L.,
('::1rl'·j
d.
_. (.'........._ ._
, -.1.1..._
l...()'~,'_i.
·•· ..;·,.·'l,h I
',.' ~ J ~ .J
"'I~ts
t. U
C)"'"
.~. l.C
"f"":,
1..) f · , ;.1:,,"-4
......
I
S em etc s t sub icc t saT e . WL.".l""'t...... :'' ' ' n' ' 'g' ---,---.::-t>"""u""'t"""'-;:;}';:-::!c::-:s::-:t"---'T.l:--:;,:;~s:--it s
t.:""".
'-'-e
(!.J.. 'c'n
! j"-i'''C
J. ,~ .... v' •• _-~..,~-
.:.:> l" ,. J ...: L,'J's
L. (~"'ey
l. J • '('.0. i"'At
l •J 1···...
:\.H V - ·~~r '.11·"'y
l.. t:: J _
:1rebe:blg 'i'cs~:,.::cl). Thi; ]iscom- I

pJetcly to the sub] ect ha:r!',~l(;ss ~~.Tld che test
results are closely held .
.f. Personality Structure of Defectors
St 1.Idy - OIm-li'ii.-do-i:Lo-ok-'fo-·(1cf'0·i'mTl1e--:Che "'per-
'sonaTity structure of defectors durin.g the
period 1966-69. The ·work primarily involved
an analysis of the open literatpreorikno~n
defectots. An ancillary effort' was concerned
with a study of the phenomenon of defection
itself~ i.e., leaving one religion for an.other~
or changing one set of political beliefs for
another. The wOTk was conducted at Stanford
University. I I
...... , ..
h.Communications Link Loadin
n er care u y contro e con Itlons, some u. S.

microwave communications were recorded and p~ssed
through the intercept system under test to prove
quality of performance. All intercept:material
connected with this was destroyed within a few weeks
of the ti~e of intercept and the material was never
~hecked for ~ubstantive content. \
00240.
I '~
. .
···/<iC<.. •.
.... "
- .".
i .', ~. '~].- 2. Z; :_;. ~. "7 3
f'1··~··'·
•_ ,. L
I'i- ''1'
.. ' ,,'j .ji'~' C:.(.~_ .L.
- ..L. 1-.... . . l-·'
,1...
Technology
,
SUBJECT Survey of ORD for Non-Foreign
",llce.l..J_6<:-""CU ., - .'- .7 ... __i "-'.;
T ' .,. . - ] .. ,,'." --.-'~ _·.CLJ.V L. ••• es
At 11 a.m. today, each division and staff chief

or his representative was ins.tructedt6 query all of
his people and report back by this afternoo1l1·;hether
or not they had provided atiy services or dealt with
any.other ,agencies on dCoiTlestic, non-foreign matters.
The attac~~d list is an inventory 6~al1items we
were able to uncover. If additional information on
.-
any of
-: .
these topics is desired, we canproy:ide either

a verbal 'or a written report on very short notice.
~~_I
SClent.1Ilc AdvISOr
'to
Director of Research-& Development
Attachment:
As stated
,-
00241
I
A 1) J.- (ip () ~, cd ()F]{ 1\";"' eat (; s t if: ~i.. t e 1)1" C g 1" arn \-:ll.ic':Jl- Ij~;j.Y "iJe
politically sensitive.
!';2n:oU cs-·- cur fOl.~c] gn :.::;ctivi ties aloe K611 ki1c~':n

. .... in DDS&T .
A negative ri.:'pOl-t f:comi.. he S1.lpport Staff.
ORD's I Iwork l~as reported to the-FAA about

t:bree ye;lrs ago. No action was taken, to cur knowledge.
----.,-,-------:------.J~ Performed in t e lligibili iy enhancement

___......
of audio tapes for BNDD. Source of tapes unknmm.
------'-
. --- .:.... .
1 1- At ~he.reque?t of FBI, we de~cribed
Imagery Ennancement Technlques 'germane to.removlng
distortions from some photographythet had on an
alleged bank robber. Request for specific support
in processing the i~agery was turned down •
.. .
./
0024~
,.
/
"
:.;:y tot a 1 contact 1'/ i th other a.genc:i. cs :i.n '~:<~lT1S of ass is t ;~nce
,',',' J'__ ",_. 1.,1 (....',0, (~,l_......

',' ,'I ,7> 5 "lo' _i, C",
t... ,]. -,' ,', .'.l. ~~.
'-J .l. 1,;.,..
.; O·f"....
:. J. ~ 1) '.1 ~
1_ t.-'- - . 1-
U to
~..:. t..."'11
_ ..; ';1
I. _
,.. h_ ,.,.
.l ... "? ~. _-_ r"-' 1.•. ri
-r.; •.r:
rv.l . Q~ 0
-, ;u.....
t., .•
'r ,'; 1r
.~. ~ ... -
veillance countermeasures, anti-hijicking, or drugs. Speci-

,fically, I participated j,il TSCC and R&D S~:bC01:::::Iittee ;neetings
which included technology exchanges and some equipment ~x-
~hanges on a temporary bas~s ostensibly for testing or trial.

I also a~sisted in x-raying the office walls of the Chairman
of. the AEC (then I,ll'. Schlesinge:r) at the request of Mr .. Richard
Cowan of A~C Security. The operation'oc~urred one evening
(date unknOl\'n) and ,-,ras an attempt to resolve, some anm;lalies
created by the use of th~-I I
Other persons contacted over the years have been:
Mr. Robert Burnett, Secre't Service
Mr~ Martin Pera, u. S. Customs
Mr. Marvin Beasley, DASA
J-.fr. Thomas Allen, FBI
,Major Jack Nelson, OSI!USAF
Major John Langager, ONI/USN
Mr. Richard Cowan, AEC
00243
•
~.....
:--:.':;-.
.. ....' ..
I~ _:. ,"'-.: 1--:O-=7-=3~""'--~-

1"7'=-7
State Navy
}\.i.:r: Fox;ce us Secret Servlce
.Arrey NSA
.'.
DIA
FBI
2. Joint funding of two contracts 'vi th State Depart-
ment {TRN/LLL}. Two electret microphones were furnished"
to state Department for test purpo~es. Joint funding of .
. one contract with NSA' (Sandia). Participation in DNA/DOD'

... ~- .. ' .".. ~...,.... . ,"" :'~'~.. - -- ' ':it
.~ ...,.!
contract (Bureau of Stanpardsl •
. 3. Other DOD and Governnlent contacts for information
collection or exchange only •

..
ARPA
LEAA/Dept. of Justice
DNA/DOD
Office Teleconununications Policy
Office of Army/Provost Marshal General
Army/Military Police Agency, Ft. Gordon
Air For~e/Office.of the Inspec.tor General
Air Force/Electronic Systems Division

'00244
,--
/
_ •• - .>
.. :!c1
.'.
'- ..
00245
.I ~'>
..•.•' ..." ... '..... "."
,.- ....
.'
-._~
. ' .
... '"
.':::~F·-:.r C)1 t;; c 1: s '..: {r h C;:: 1~ •.-: i; n. 5 .. t . :;.; ." ("T':;' :'<: ;:."; c 1. I . So ~.':~ (~h
(~(:·tl1.(l !:~\ . \.~~ !~t:<.·.~1 ~·:·f.l -~ 31 ~~::e \".if (.:I:\··,~'·~.·""'·;:~·~:,i"·:~:t ..i. "r£"\'~':~~:;'" :~.>~::>r
';)1 ~"'~.:"'(~·f;~·S~: 5.11E ·:~(::.~'..:.\)t 3.e ~.''',:,'::-~J ~ .,' ··~.S
... ~~':)~\ ~}~J~l1gi)' ~)f ';:'(~c~:}li('~~l :~ ::..:.":,):.:."::·l·l:i()~·l :t~::}.~1~:i.:;lg t ! ) c1c"tcc-·

t ion 0 f l' 2. d i iJ ;1 j1 C 1 j d. (; 5 ~)l t ~ : e r:: ~l V 1. T~(".~·:..~:~:I..:-....!
.• ]CL)..!oot_~--,---_---,
.' IL..---_ _
'f ·r.J'1}1·J.~-:31 (li··~·;{.~·;].".)s:f-'c;~s :;,-'-:l·i.::i.tijig t() ":;.S:;'.11g }}{ SE.:·;1T!I1il1g'
(';(~i)ip;t:eJ"it
1and f i 11 .
to cletcc"L.·· ·:.:.:(~".;,::;:,;:,.o'.).'d
,.---------....:.,1
E:ij:cs J.n a :=.anital'y
BNDD
- Exchange of technical information relatirigto the
LI_d_e_v_~e_l_o. . . ,. . . p_m~e. .".n_t,.- O_f_I"- - :- ---Jr- --,(
USDA & BNDD

- CIA has reouested
. .
the establishment of a two-acre
plot o£op~umpoppies at a USDA research site in
Washington state~ to be used' for tests of photo-
recognition of opium poppies. .
,.-------'---------'----
US COAST GUARD
!
- About six.years ago, CIA infrared equipment was made

available"for USCG tests to e~aluate IRas a means
for night sear~h of life boats.
- ALCOHOL &TOBACCO TAX DIV/IRS

I--~
- Aboutfiv~ years ago assist~nce was reqtiested in
domestic search of "moonshine" stills using CIA
infrared scanners. This ,\'as turned dm"rn.
1----=-=.....:..'--'-"------
S~TT
JLVJ'~
00246
•
I ...
- T",·( ~'~;1~t:;11 ~.~5.~:·:'·.::·;·'·~·:·:~s ':~: ...!_.,..;... ~. . :~ t() ;.~.~t;;\:t··~.·.·~.: j 1.), ,,,Co i.~:
~,"~."' :.:f-, t t ; .:,',4'; ~.~. J. .I~··i· l. ;: .;:'L. _~ ::~.1~ ~ ..\.~ :..~ J .:; ":.~; ~~'\,'L' r 1:'1~'; tl. S . ., ~.f.>>:. ~~ ("~)
~)(J.l ,1 \'.;1·.
~ .. SC)J"J1C of Ll'lC .:\j".~C r~:.~.T-'()1.~atorics, (~ . . e. Say":?riil;'.:Jl ~~.i\;-(~r

tabora tory, ;; 1'0 51:;:portcd by CIA to <lc:::rclop nnHo
'·";"(-lJ·d~
I..,. - " "":l"")lJ-"-~
""'J." J '-"-·(1
,lg ",.
. .' "~(;"''''(-l'i()!1
V ~ ( . ' , _. " •• _ 1',>("I',n;"'--"'5
'" _ . . . . . . ·.tt.t__ :~·"d
.. J. _ ,
,.
(":';\'lces. 'f',}ese ...
T ' . ,,,::'.ve
<::~'':,Ol'a1:(;r).C$ ;':$(; d S:3:::P.i' J:i1g
-
t(;chn:i.({ucs clcvcJ.opc:d For CTA '~O :i:(:asure CC";US
nuclear plant releases.
2
00247
•
I
"
1 • . :snDD(c;:2,1~JJ:S C;:. .::\.i.n) ~·:;-',:3·':~',-,:;n 1:.-~<.:':i33i''::!1 to :c'2l:eive

pro.posals from Aerospace, Inc., concerning a Ran:::.!' People Detector
developed for ORD. Tine: Fall of 1972. Action vas appx'oved by
D/OPJJ.-
2.
[~-~-
3.De".reloped Adhesive Restraint, Non.,.lethal Incapacitation System.
Reports and information was made available to Department of Justice, LEP~
in August 1972. If they developed the system, it would be used for.
civilian crowd and riot control.
'.'
'.
00248
I ..~
... ',
. .. , . "" . ..... ... . ~.:~ . ' 5..') ..
.,,:,:1.
'
.'~ ,.. "., ~'~ "~- .~ .:
' ~.:' (
",
.1 :
",- ... ..,..

... ;;:
. -..:1..
~. ~', ,~ :.
~ ~
.... , j••
L -~. ".~"
"'\~ ....-
().:: ~: ~i~: . ··:C... M;:.! . ..:-~~ ~~:-:::t :": .::;<._<': C ~1:':: r;::.:__'~:; . .: i. :,/.:. _.j .t;::-~·~ .:.:.:::.. !.. l:-::!l ::~") ~::- :.:~.~ ~.~=-""':?i :: :~ ~::!.
::=: .~~ .:: .~ .•:; t. .~: ~ '_:~~;'.~,; J:;.;: ~~~ :··'.C.l// :~. -:~ ~/. -; 3.,:':; ~~ ~J .:;. :" .~,..: :::.,-::;¥/ _: ":: ~:~.:l i:;"}. ~ ::)·1.. ?.: ,:; i_ :~;:l 1. i :~-::~ r:;-c
.:;.:.~~?~·:~·~l ·~".::.::..-;~3 '/~.:~(;j.:; ::~~~-..::(l .::':.::;.... -~-;::~:_~;;..::. ~.:i·~.-':::1~~. ~::I.--. !:-;:3.~;;~i.:1s ~:.;-~;l b~l.~.:'l
:.::i:·£)loy~:: d :;~:J 7:.~"'::~w~ '!~:}c~~.::.i '::31 5~)::uri~t.y ~i ~J":t$.i,cn '':-lnd
.. 1 i1 \.~ 1: ~1 ~;:..:' .r::..~ i..l::; .2l '::-C :~rJ~i'::;C:ll pZ'c-cr-::..;~:;i~·.g =2·:?;~L.i.,1:t·t? 7...:1. .:-.~::,~
t':'~::=C:1~·~~ ~1 L::: ,?:.;~.::: n i.: 7 I :..; t~~;"; .:;.: :~; ::: ~~~l
b=i~g t~c t~,~2~ t:o ~~:~~ l.~·~}~ ,-; -= .:~ .:: ::::i ::y ~.~ ::? ~.:,;; ~::::!i :1.. 0 "t:J ~ £(;, 2;~'; J_':' ;-11 ~:j
c, f ';;:1;~ ?17·:. ,;.i:.-z ~I t.,:;. ';;.~
:"'"t-, ... . . ;;';". -.'",! _ _ «-...
I J
_..
'"
}...··n. L.
_ ... y
~,.O'\":"t~::~er
• ...
J,.:;I-:.. t .r.~:r \.J~~;')",J.j~ ....J
'
.3.~pear2.U
...
.:1 __ 'r::19
-""J'l.1'
~r~J
!~--:!jC~.~~tC::-./ ~r1i t.h. . ~. "::.~7.ge CC;'lt..ai!'&i;.~g ~' nl.l~a~ of ccnv-:~.rsa"::5. . c::.s

I
i Z"·?Carc:3t.l -:'='hrong'h l;~·ijal ~/Jiroti;1!)?i:1g.. ~:~e t:~~"e ~;';:"iS ';0 J.;~ :"':5·::t1
I
i
I
i'n ;:}!.9 p==or;ecu-t-ic-;1 c,f
~ t;{;~.r-::7~?;~~:r }_~7,l.
,,::-;~:a () ~ ~.;~.~ :~1.2~.:,;j·~::~t ~"::2ii:':f::i.:"3
]~. c~=--3G;:-~T
~1:T';: f:c:,"\v.5r:,;.::.~ic!J:J r:''::':..11{.: ba' !:1:a~~ ~o~.e ·~·i:i.~t2'l~.isi~le thr·::rt:t~h t~a
..~n.::.ly:> .i s j~:~l(:":'>j~~t.~d tha.t ~r"}.3't of
on. or c..:10U·C
·"?iC~S3i;:g ~Y-ai.labls in t~2 la:'Qi:a=o~f. I:l ""Y'iavl ci: t~e ~c~~t::

~ri~icel ~3.ture of. t.,~e r~q:;.~5tl r;::C.Cr.~,35i·n.g 1..~ag· ~::·:S~lU-tl j_~-:=::~:3":~~;~:
" ED~. ~"\t-er s: .1:~r~' C~"1ski:"".:.3
"';j; ~3 j . .r:f.:·~-:-.t:;(~ ~::1;~ t ftlt!.:.:::a P:::-C·C$~3 5,i"r~~r ~1Li.~r~t
:1~~~,'ud co ])~ ~'t~;:.~::1·2d r~.0J~-:; ::.:)r;~all.?!. 1. .,. ...3 it ~ . :.;it:h a:;.pro~}'a<l f~om
, :~i··¢:~,r l~ve!.;.; :~i t::~in t::e Agc'nt=-:!_ If si_=ilar '!:"~qt:c'::; i:s ~.,oul'::'· be
.i
cc,c~ri:::~
-- en a fr:2<1_tl,,;c.:1t J.iasi-:.; I 3U'!in_..:-est~d 't~at n':.;~;DD
....
cC'!ll[f i~s:: t=ai..~~It~ in ~:.e "'.132 of tl1~ ~iccss:;.',ing s~l:ste;:r..
.......
-·i=!r:;c":1,,",a-].
;;-- ::- - _- -
00249
I
I
....... ~.......
LJ ~~""l.3 ;) ~ -·/t!:= !.;").:l
1. On 13 April 1972 i'.f-r. Charles Ga!ildns of the Bureau of

i'~ a:.rcc tic;3 D.lld D~·:.:(:gc 1" CU. S T) ru.~~5 ·L-e\=i1_~c s t~ (lS~A.. ;V' I J: 11 / t-:'.:1 D ;: s 3 iSt:1:.l1:ce
to. imp::o·"rc ti~e intelli~itd.litJ'" of an (11.1d.1o .tc~pa t!~"at hac] been 2cqltired
by I~I~:DD 2gcn~9.
00250
! .. "'''''III
,
..
(.f
,. .i .. ..: .. ... . ~::; ; 1
",-,
.:.J·1 . ," .;.
t ..
0025:1
'I
!
.'0. ,_
.:.:-:!:,
1. 0117 3une. :t972: !.~-. J··~.rcR. ~~ei..~s c.f };e:"~e::;.:~l Sci,::.n'ti.f:'c Cerr··
(:tese) ;~,:~q1.H:st:ed. the cC:'Jpe:::'::\i:.io~:.·of S.LJ.J ~;r~ t.:.,(;"; F"":.cr;;:,:cf.:'"i;:':; c:: <~~ :'::~::'::;y
~;'lC.::'O t:;;:pe he r:<,:<i rF.c •.;ived £::0;:;:' tlH?.. balt:':.J'::;;:"c; i:;';:i::·.::,::::r.:i O£~~:;'Ce of :s:·~::;n4
l'~. Jc.\ll.c-"l Eulla.rd, Reg~:c~l Di;'bctor, b~.G co!.~t.Cic:t:E:d 1-:=. hciss to eid
El\DD it:!. the E..n'!:".enceoent of tbe -conV'e-:::setio:::.s on t11~ .Up€: rc::.cor.cing ....-hich
"tere r.'-",_sket.:! br bac.l::.g:!:ound ~usic. 'fb~ res;.;lts of the p~oces6ing '(..~1 he,:
used in E.. g=;;.nr! jury i!lvestis:ation a,p4 pN::;sihle follo ..;r-on trial. rz..
'';il~J
u __ J,-.._~•...· d ".I ~
C.1..C .. -t
1~... ..{n.~·~,..,..<f·
...... '-' _,-,::. .. e ".,-~
h,....vJ t-._·hr.::o- ........... ..-;~p
v ...'-... ~._ a"'~_
f ..; •• c:.. 1-t=.""rl':"?\.rt. _ of' -_. T.-r;,.,,~S's
_ .10fT'" \ •• ~ ...-. ~J"'-
<- •• pe -~
...
."
00252
to' ~ r I P.I P. Z'; :.
"
.~. ::
" :: "
..."-:-..
~._~.;:: t-:"
'.
..~.
"
",
0025,3'
- I ; Z c r ..-.. pw', , - - . . . . .
~'
-
/ " :-
.•
1/:
' . 1 .....
; . -.. . .
I
\ ~," (.~ F: ":{" i.:\("';
,- .
~')~ \ ';.: ! i: 1~
"7 >f.; Y l'~j '/3
ST.l)'-)J .E~(; T: ·.feL:I>!n t11is 1 :.~').c·:""<: concc:-rning :':!ly OS.A

. a c ti·v i ti.,~ ~~ \"\·l·j~l: Jl (' C,1.l1d l)t.~t 1":1 ~~ J\g i~'~'lCy in.to i"tll
en1.barras sing sitl:ation.
1. There are no luissions \vhich \.ve have £1o,\v,1. during the last four
years with which.! can associate the result direct~y to an)ractivity
p,)tentially embarrassing to the Agency. There were a number of missions
flown that indirectly have the potential for this en.1.barrassment. Bear in
mind t}.at once we turn. the filn1. over to NPIC or any other agencYI we
have 110 control over subsequent distribution.
. .
2. The lni.~~i'Ons listed on the· attachment are in three categories:,
a~
¢ategory A: These are m.1 ssions Ilo\.\'n in the U. S.
that ar,e very similar to the potential'that you discussed with me
using the example bf the,
Santa Barbara oil disaster.
~
", ': •. b •. '¢~~~g<:>ry

B:: The I . illicit " ~detectionof
poppygr;~~:~{s a. separate c~a~t~e='=g=o~r=y~b~e~c=a~u~s~e~of the high sensitivity
of this subJect~
, ..... :
' ..'.
c •. Ca.:tegory C: When we were developing LONG SHAFT.

In effectl we were I
though-tT"o-o-u-r---
1n the broad sense .
3. Ihav,especifically looked to see where our U·,..2's were

operating during th,e Watergate break-in discovery. Den1.ocratic National
......
, q'Q;P Si;cP ET OO~54
I)
,
<.: o:n ~\. ~~.. 1t·j"(;n 3. !~(l T~.crl ','."; l~i I.: ,'; 11 J\T;:.~.! I": t} ~ J. C:·~··.! ". r· 11. ~.(l ~1. 1"j. J1 ~ l"!.e <::.1:.0<) \' t~ .: \" \.:H ts
(){:cUl."rc,,·l :;."11 the }:;:l,:;:1.: ,::.ntl (')11 r ;:. ;.J.'{~ r:':.ft t._:"! ~'~~cj··c :";!i~;slon'$ \..li".tl".~~lg tiii :'j t1..~~tC
,..... d, ..,.! \.:~!,;; ill tl1C ·::,.:~.'~,.>!.-n F····i'l: "f 1)',0!..T. S.
Brig:·,·:i,;;1.· GeneJ.-al. USAF

Director of Special Activities
. Att2.chl~1.cllt - 1
As }1ot~d above
TOP SEeft~Y
".
00255
.........
',,-
~
TOP &M5£RE'P
"
.,
.~
. ' . ' ". '.

TASK BY WHOM/WHEN PO'S'SIB'-LJl, "MPL-~'
.,..,. li ~"""'''':'<T
·J.vl-~ J... .... I.......:J.~
./ CATEGORY A
Santa Barbara Oil Dept. of Interior.' Feb 1969. Potential for providing bas:~ :Lo::,'
Disaster criminal law ::;uit;:;. P:L'e~ su ..·~ or-.
oil con"lpany to change 0i.)c:;:;:;.tior••
HILLTOP ( ~ \..' ) ORD/NASA Earth Resources Pos sible u:; (: fa r L-.d·~lS ;;:;:iL"•.l.
Programs •. Spring/Fall 1969 cxploitatior.. Cl'Op Pl'O(~'~~cLo;-l
C011trol &: est~:Lr..i.a.tcs iu·~1.t~·.(: :t...c!a.:.i..·~·;"C~C.
Snow Survey :' I. : Environmental Science Services Industrial ex:)ioita~io:1.. Wi..I.~Cl'

Administration (ESSA), Dept. resource a.llocation.
of Commerce thru COMlREX.
Spring 1969.
Hurricane Base Office of Economic' Prepared7" Political lcve:l.:age£o ..· ciisa::;tel'

Lirie ness. Spring 1970. area funds.
Earthquake Damag e Self generated, NPIC processed. l:Jolitical levcJ. at:;c 1

q \:;l·il-(li:"L~i,.l
t. t.~ " Ii I.•.. l • 'J
Feb 1971.
I'
n.cglig,e11cc SUit5. lZ(;C~i-"SJ~~'1.~ctivl"";"

exploitatiorl.
Minn~apolis - OSI/ AEC Division. Jan - Mar EnviJ.·011lncn..~al api)lh-:;.l.t~<J'-,s 1

o Kansas City 1972. m:barl planning; exploi~;.. t~·""il.
o
N
~
TOP STLClfuiiT
I . ··1;;
"~
'YOP SEORE,¥
•
'.
TASK BY WHOM/WHEN POSSIB:WE IiVIP .I.·~Ci\TIO :'-~-
CATEGORY A (continued)
RIVER BOAT(V'II.,.
J ~ ~ I.
"'j',',
,
!)t) NRO - ·ICRS. April 1973. Political li::vcragc. LG.\'-~;:j·~:.i."ii;..l
exploitation, civil ciar.-.<i.;; e suits.
West Virginia Dam NRO - Alomy Corps of Potential :fo:: :;:cal c::, l:&i;;:;
Site Coverage Engineers. Jan/reb 1973. cxp1oita tio ..... , water cont:.:ol.·
CATEGORY B
I (Puerto Rico),
I
Multi
BNDD, DDI! CIA, NPIC, ORD.
Dept. of Agriculture. Fall 1972.
CIA extension of clo;),~ ti·::'..\·~.cldn;
£loom SEA to CON'C',s. 3dtcl'
Spectral Sensor techniques to avoid detection or
growth.
CATEGORYC
LONG SHAFT NSA! CIA COMINT collection.
I I
o
o
N ~sGOP SEcB Y;'T
CJl
.-J
/
I
("C~11t~·:.(.:t':::·l{ ;.~ 11. jl1 ,)f"fic'c ',,'it]l (·,:';t:=::'-I)t.1:.:rl1 ~>{. r ,til'" ell "fDY-·-
): e : " - 1.1 1. oj: S ;.: e L d t ·i. \. C
'--_~--I- contacted
all
. but . two who were on leave--n~9ative.
~
Parangosky negative on those he could contact. Follo~ing ar~

people he could not reach:
Isaid FMSAC ''has negative results.

I
L- _
00258
'A. "
;;...
w "
.. " ~ .
·--1\U:;MORANDUM FOR: Depllty Directo;'.fo!" Science
".' ......
,", '.
",'
"(:.t"~~ ,ahached. 1ettel·fr()r.n.~O;l'f~il:~n:'He~:1:t:5B:ouse ::ArmedSer"\'ii.-e~ :';,:,:::;Z;*: ,~.~i'i3\1·:'\~
, Co", mittea. together with the cnclos~~e f r~''''r > , ,'> "., l
D','!c>rwaraec1 [or'your information and ,:"c'h action as yo,,"dccm
··:~~i~l'l·()pl~la;te. "lha.ve rechecke:iVtl~.~·t,()!l;nlitu,r~:staff.indhave been
.', -.:. "
- NOTE: This'memodtd 6 June 73'COLC'73-0635) '(pgs'259 thru ,265)' was

;".._,.!!!nt to the 1..:2. for his information.and was not considered a part of the'
DDS&T components' sobmissions;to::theIGin response to the Director's"
. requast on "Questionable Acti vi fi'iis'"and, therefore, it is. believed
\. th~-trthese documents should not be included in t~e ~alperin request.,
. . ' . '~'",..' . .
.. ,,~.
''-...' .
...+::.,.
L!1~4tB~~~~~~1!t,
CH . h.. s:.:r·
...t.::: ~·,tt.iot:.\".:.:tit~~.';~
W .. :..~~.-:...c
~C:-.:,i&.rT ..·CA.I..,.... · .,. ~
..· ,U? ,":-,. ~'."".
:' '.:' :...:;": ....
.
A-a'lO' W~~.t....
, ·r:=a~f1,·c.......,.,rl".·YC)(".
· a:,t.L ''':HUO. l..f.,",. . 'f'; ... '
" ,J.\\:j( I:n,~'(... -:",. " . .. ' ;:

· t"'-"lli'<T "...(":t~).l'ololU._.W.,V"- '.::
/ '~V;;;':"'Y" • .
. '~_"''Y)
~~""'~D ;f.Jl'i''''''W~'''·''.'t~X •...
... ,...-."'1'.
;:0.... M_ ,.,. '. '.... ·"·::·:"::NJ~nY-THI#lO:.CO:llGRa:$S.:
.~.<~~F~;i::D~~AROH.s:aE:~'j; CH.\!R:~~~" ...•.. :~:
:.'.. ,,'
LK.,,· ~~iI1""'.. '\~l~
=:~~:~~~~~lI'. " .~. :~..~ ,.:.... - ~.~~" ••/0'. . .
.. ':'. ~
·:1.\;.(,-4 .a.-:~~.i3 ....0 ..~ •

....TIll&:1 '-ll&:I.l1oq"~CR •. cor.n.
....:: .... .' .,'
,,!' '.'
..; ':'~':' .. ..... -
....•.. ;.: .. <.~....'

.... ~
.:':' :-~:;l~_i~.~·.-;.~·;·. ~ - .~ ;- .... "

.~~ . : :~'::...>; ..
, ....,). "tl;2dred1."ce=~';:~~'~;i
, .';<~,,-~j;S ~ort~~;;'~r L..- -_~..,.,.-_-=---,,==
~ .f
.-migh·t.~;~QP1~a1:e._"·:-
~. :.
... '
". .~ .. '''''',~.~
"._~.'
.:; .. '
.. :"
.- ~. '"
.....
.......
·t-
-'}'. ·Ea~·;. Hebert
;~;:~'%:;~J>n'"
.; .....
• •j
.., .. -~. . ••.• ;0 •
:.-~.
. .. " ,
".F.Ei-I :'t-:hb .: .
'"
.• 0-:
~ : -- "';.. .:-.
.;'.~~:~!~:~j~/-:'. :- .
., .......
.... ';'. . '.).:;~.~,.:.:.
.. ' . . ,.' ,...:~;.:.> '.•:.-:
-.:
.;.
h.····
'. ,~.
::~', "'~ .. ,:-:

"""'.
',' ~ .
....
. ~. '.
'., '. ;'.

.. ::
'_: .~
...
..
~
~- -t··...
.." "
'.' ~.,
., ~:. ' .
'.
. r:·
.;'
' ......
···.t. r,
. ~ -.
\:-.---:. .. : ....•...
-:.:.-.~ ...... _._.. ~.:-.~
.. ,-
." . ; .. .~
. ....
~ ~
. .•. :..
., .. '
\ ..: '.:f
o'
,--
0026:1
0
.'
00262'
\\
I'~ ....
00263
,
\.
",',
"'i;,;
"
i,,\<"
r<' ;,""
L:;", ",' '/"
.
.
"
,
) " .
00264
",
'",-
\
..,
/ 00265
.'. ~-.
\
r""-'\"
, \ )
./
(,)'0.,-01.0- /3
~,jE~·lOR.'\~~J}U;vf FOR: Deputy Director for S.:icilce ~lld

Technology
SUBJECT: Policy Regarding Aisistance to Agencies
Outside the Intellige.nce COffi1lEmity /In
Spe~ch Processing PToble~s
.. . ;. .
.'.
. ..:~i·
1. Recent publict::Ohcern over Agency af{i~iations ,

with law enforcement activities has made me wary of offering,
speech processing assistaqce to various rither government ,_
agencies. My concernhere,'i,s restricted to government
activities outside the intelligence community. 'Because
ofa scientific communitya'varenessof the expertise. of
,m.embers of, GEL in speech' processing problems , Ke are often
, asked by individuals ingovernmcnt· for help on various '
speech problems. The requests are usually informal on a
person-to-person basis. While most of these contacts
involve only an exchange of unclassified inforination~
several have involved the use -of labriratory reSources.
2. Co'ntacts havecoine.from the FBI, Attorney
General's office" Bureau of , Narcotics and Dangerous
prugs (BNDD), Post Office, and the Treasury Department •
. Of the above, assistancetoBNDD had been specifically·
san,ctioned by Mr. Helms. In one recent instance \'lhere a'
noisy tape was to be used ..in a court case, care was taken-
to· insure that the processing of the t.ape \vasdone entirely
by. a BNDD ,employeeeven:though it ,,-as done in an Agency
laboratory ·us iug the -Agen.cy' s Coherent Spectrum Shaper
equipmen t . - , . .
.-
\ .. ' /
"~MTI"ll
GutH .L
l~------,--------:---------,-_J
00:266
\
", ~.
'",; :
"
OEL-OIQ-73
,(!;.. ge 2
~)····\V .,,(I,J...
J.J\.J
\ .'.!;"1 iT
6 VJ~
..(:;;It y .... -'.,"J.
'...... of" ,,"'h·j.:....
l.J ..... ~ "..... .. .:1. ........
;it 1 1"0 _ f)·~""'~·-·:~I-·-·
._ •• .1.;;'.... ~..} . . ~. '~.~~
•• I~Cjl
1 . t
/18.::>- 'Jl,) . , . t
(1~)0 - ..,"' _. d'<1
.lJiil;U:"e· .':.;,' .': ~LI..._".....
::>J.6J.·IJ.. ,<:111.
..
\'.0].,1. 1 ",',1·
,~,_'~d. on.. US ' 8.n . d
there is a benefit to us in that such contact enables,
the staff to test tec;hniqiJ0S ~~;;d t~quipl,:entlJn :;r.variety "
nf' ,'" -,,'.--11
'.. ~, - 1-' t...
-'-.L 1·)·1·'01D l..' "'''1':::
I..: •. _ • "'l-1-r'~1"':1'11:;
. tJ _ f.~.
j .....111'(' ";':"'l"
J. ~ \-""~
1 'It "hi"
L ..........
...." ...
1"'Cl~'il']"
.... "'""
J. •• '-:'1-1"
1_.... _. ~...._...
,-_ • .J.. ,J J,..J Il.....
1,"\T01
.,-, •
'n','"
(,. "'"
[nl'l-';-fn] in ~L-("l';;!S
-: .~ (',f :,(,1r';':'~j I'S
•• ., ••. - '" •• 1 '"
1',) ;
__
('C(FT'll'~11'
.,.-._j." _.
••• .
.\gene)' goals. E.::nce h'e \"01.l1d be ~'.'illing to continue ,.to

support other departments on an ad hoc basis, but ~ould
appreciate your guidance re the ld.sdom of OEL I S invohiement
in ItdCI:lestic" activities_
I.
\
"
N~JJ$ tCLed 011 ~
. . c:Jir r./ ~tll1 .~ t14. & ..It;) .

5,-c>~.{,- .. cI
. :." ;" ".

.: .
~~·;·.t,:: ':,. .'
';';;"'~-'---- .. _.'--"-'----'-- --_. __ ._------'--'--'--'-~....;
. ~. -, .- -.~ ..
.,_.-_._-'-_0__._- . . .
~ . .__._
-_ ..._.. _ ....;.._._~._~----. --------- .... - - - - _ •• _ . _ . _ _ .. _ . .... ·0 ..
"._:... _.w_·_,.~.,_~ ..•.• __"'._ .,._...•.... "4" ._, -- •
.. _ ·w_~ -__ .~ ._.. _ ; . .:. ~ .. ,-"""-" .. :< .
I '"*' ~:
r_. . "
- -,:>" .- •• .._ ••".- .........._•• -_.-.,._--- ...... _..••.•••
~ ........ - ".' .--" ' .., _.:.
/
..,J ._. .... --;-.-

. ,·----·:,-··.. . ····-··---·--··-·.. ~~l)026B
./
'. ,
. ,
- --_ _-----_. ._~ ._~: ~L.i;..~~_~ . i-~~_,~~ ...._'_" -:-.:..'.;. "_.. _.~. ~·t
.r
1
-_._----------~-----_._-----_
~--_._-
,~je.
t
.. f'
I" 1-
,Against whomc\o these agents work:on.what clothey " ~'
- report, arid to whom?
/ , Get copies 01' the reports on "Restless Youth" and black radicalism •
...({: ..
How is the cryogenic magnetometer used, on whom, and 1'orwhat
"
..
.' purpose?
'''2- '''Get copies 01' the reports on lOS. ....--
/rWhy does DCScollect in1'ormation on

I I
What is done with it?
1 1---
,~y is DCSgetting I IforW.hom, and 1'or what ~'
,'purpose? " ,
>(Get' a runclownon I IV
'.j Give me a couple 01' paragraphs on To1'te. r;. "
,'3 Include the submission 01' FR Division. ~
c, " b Get ~he f'ullst,ory on providing a~ias docUmentation to the Secret ~,........'~..
,I " Serv~ce. ' '
t""-\l 'Why did we pay the costs of" the responses to letters received
, ,,~y f'. about the ~eS:i.clentI s speech on Cambodia?, . '
';'tlsuppiying beacons to Ambassadors seemsiik:a good idea. How many --"

~ are there in use and where? "
,','J,Uhy :lsLogistics procuring_police-type_equipment 1'or local police v

·1'orces? '
, ' ,I!r What

/:"' "
,a-l?'t'W,hy is it
is' ,a. telephone analyzer'? ,,/
necessa~t4 to continue
I-'--------'-'-'~-----'--
_~ _
'l1More on Vesco. How did it get started?', Wh~t,was done? Why was .,.-'
'i.tstopped?
,- <1- What were the ,multiple channels to CIA on the lOS matter? .-----
00269
/
. (~j) '--_.,'. .. .,
· --~---'.---~o/tf?~.::_f: ·.~.0. _ ~f_ik~_;"'tbo_t>-~,~ __ ~ _
-. _.•._ .s('}-C/,..erf .j' '6-f'V. 'P!9' @~..- -. ._.. ._ .
. " , _. _ i3"C. it.-- (!,. ~ n- S -Ill)' /)--I'tt'· £.fC,.,'f r. ~. d(J'Y~ L'-
. iDS ,..;.....
.-- '{;)S~N(jt~ ~a-gu.~,.i-';n'7/~/'a·1!- ~~?- -
.~5- ,-v7LAi- I';; . bl tPl.-~....,..t.· t? ~L cvl c~~.,. ",-- tC.-r .../
J)iJ I -
_tVh...; d-"n- -f, ,,'.. ~ IL- - - - :- _
!.
:; -- ~5
~ 77
~·.c.__.,_..
te::a.
.•.... ... '0. ..._ . _ •• ,..,.,.....,.._._, • • __ . , _• ., . _ _ • • .• _ _ . • • . _ .
.. ... ' .. _...
__________V ~ S c!' o. H~ ~-Iv.-t'l-b.eJ ."r.()Jtz.y ~~rtY. ~
"
~ - /Aj(L-rd- '-V e4' "(} 111.-~(.'/!

.
;.~ /6
. ...
CL·ttJ~~··~·h e ../~ r C.-
/~. U5~ C-l ~ . t-6n1 ""'i ~ I Cl" "
,,-,' .
... .-. (\
' .. .;""'"
'. _... -".,,, ._----... _..._,.._.. _._.. _- ._--_._-..__ .._-_.._----
·
,
; ....-
~
..... ," .
. ~ .
:1, _... _.••• ~ "' ..•••' •
- ~
i: - "
r:.-
;;i·'." - ~ ..
;,- ,.
~ ... .'
'"
.• _._~~-
'......
\, ./,-.~."
~_ .•_ •.... ". _'· •. ·.4 _..
.- --....---.-- ....---.. ,.......-.'.----.-- .... -.... -- --- --" "._. ".'--'"'' .-- .... ....---..------'-··.-:--..--.., ,00270 ......--- · . · ··c .. .,,--
·
"_..-- " - -.
. ~ -• . ~'7"._._.: .....:..-
¥.~~>t ~/ IDS,
~
.:
.
> e .
. ; ...• :F-~)'\
... ·U. __... I.A
.- " _.-., -.. _..... .- •.... __.. " .. _ - _-_.. -'.;.....;,.~ ..__.-:-
..; - _-_._ -_._ "'" ..--- .. - .. -_._._.. _- .
"'"
_ _._----_. .._... _- .. _------_. __ .._--_.... .•. _..--...

... ," ._~ _.~ "-~" ._. __ ._. __.._._. .,..,--------~ ..••.. --'--'-,-"-.-',....
. :.
• ,"I
f-, , ' .
,.
~..
.. , "
., . .-- - ,- '---' . .- .. ---~-"- .._._.:. .. --.. _..--- ..-- --_._~-_ _.----.,- .
·i·
f 0027£·····,;\;),·
,f ..",--'--- --_ _---.. -" - -..- _.- -"- ..- ..- -_._ _._._..c -' -- .-.------.. -'-_. " ""'._-'---'---'------.- . - . - - - - ..- .• .-- _.~ . ~~<::;~;/;':,« .;.~"
··t· i:-"··~ --~,~t;"'i:"
'ii'
:1
'----~ - .-.-........ "-"'--,"":,-" .','~- -._-- -...
:.:
' .. ~--' ....... ..

~.~ ' ~ ,~~
.. ,,- ... , ..... ---._... -_..-..._..-.-=~..:-_;,.c.._:-:-_.:. _,_.... __. ... ..._.. _
, ... .... _.. _'. _:_ ...

.-~ _
..
.....
. ,.
r"-'--~ ~---_._-- .. ~~----- .-.- ---_.- .. _---.._-- ... __ ._-'-_... - ---",~", --_. __._- --_._----------~--- ~.:-
--'--~-
•... "
00272
~.:_,.- .. " ...... ~.- ~. ~ _.- ...~ .. -'.
. ~-.--.-----------_... _-----_.•.
"
OJ
_- -- :.._---.--:.-.. -:::--._-------- ._-_..--~----~~~_ . ._'.'_ _---- . __. _ - : -..... ..
. .. :
~. 1 ;.b.-."
- ........... ......"" __.._... . " __ . -_. -.... -~ ..._.._ _.-'-":--..:'-'.·.... ~4 ....·.....;..~,-- ;--- ._..
w (( '~'.~ ~ , -e--\S . .;-e,..
;3~~'~ 4...; o<V..U~<O;

I~c./;>'
._--.--_ .... _-- ..-.. _--- .. -.-----------._.. _._.•..
-----------_.._....._._. ----_.----'--.... ..•... - __... _.._------.
..~.
~
i
:.- ... _.\
j'. ·i---------- •• -. . . . . _ . _ _ . _ • • _ . _ •• 4' • •••• • ._~ • • ._ .- _ ~ . __ ....._ _

.··<:0'0273'
• -.-••- . - .
.y~:
"
...... 1-- ' -
- -..... , .~ ... '~ - ..
/
.f
I .-'
.. ... '::-:---:-:.---::..~'::--::::-=---.:.---.:..:::-....::-:...--:-.~-:=-._~---,--~---,--~~_---,--~---.J.. . ,... ...,
..
-A. II ~~o-~; ." ~s $r"1 ~ I-.I/,\~ e- ..•

c
,---_._----_ - _._-_._ "-.''' _.._---- ""- _ -. . _ :..:_; - _ _.-...•_.•_. ..:.....~-
._ .. 1\/ -f~_r.kc:e~ ./-". I ~ ~J .~~

0
. . . . ;h I 1f'Ve-~..,JIlV'f- .h. ~(t. "e~.,j.. . l<e.tferr; ·.
. -.. .. . . . ".. .
. .. . . '/ .!./ /\. / y~. .
r.,w. .:.• L/ ~~
-+\:-----..--:-.-- ...
. . .'
. .._- -'---'--
I
vt).QL..}7. Q.. ..{f' C r.A.,.r-ol'tSrS .
..~ .. ':, )/ ~.tllt(~ .0 f,(. -'(J;.Q ,,,.~~r..{.~-_·_ I "-'--y!_~ . ~ rn rn ~
't .I·· · - · · . ·.·.·,:·-·· . ··IJ}rtL.!1 ..~~.~._.~ •.~~J.. . . l.
'1 .' 00274
- _ __ _---_- ..
~.~_ -.. _.-
.. . .,.... -"'- --_. - .
.._ _... - _ -:':f7;.::; -: :.c. ._. ;....:.......~ ..•
.. - .~ ... ~ .. ... '.' ......• ....~ ... ~_ . ..
--_.~_ -_._- _----_. __ - .._-_._ .._._., - ~_.~ .- --.--..-.•... . ... -... _---,---'-
-' -,.... ~ --~ ........ -..- ..- .. '-~"".-:-;'"
._---:._.-..-~~.- _...__:--;-;...._--..- .... ~_.'----_._ .. _.. ,._-_.__.

',.
,
"{;r~r~;orr\
.'
---
.:>l1;hpr--: I .7/>. UJ~~~"k: .c<,;?'E=' .
.~..' .' .:;~~ (\ '<J ~f-fth". ·6.3~.. x·-/-4 . <['. ~Q../~ ,
r!.0- .~t;;v tvp ~ f lP
. "'~ ...... -. .~ , ..,. .' ,;,.,_: .... - :. - ..
------_. --'" .•. __..- _._- _ __ ._ _.. __ _-_ __ _--._----..._.__ _ _. '-"-' -.--._ _ _- ----
~_. - ,:. .:.-'.:.,._-- .. ', .
.... .-
.-
,,~ r~ "
'~~=--~-=:~-.,~=~~=~==--~=~-=:-.-~~------'=:~
.
...-.
./.,
.. . . ...- ....,.... '. __...._ ..
:_. ~02;6-·
.~ -~:4 _.~.:~ ~
• . ··,,··_·"·oe__ . . • ._ . _ - , - - , - . ......-_.-........
-~-~_ ..... -
....•... W""
.;. fi."
"..'.'.:.:,.<.,.;
.. ;..
I
~. ,
.• .•.• • .• ,- .. , " .. --."¥', ••
.9.;;.·~~"6 ....f?~ W:S cr-Ir ~i ._P1~:_~~ ... :~ . . -..~/a5 .

. .. L'".AI.. .d1 .·10....,+ . . .
...c.~cJ(e:c1 ~ HC>I B~:6-'<;rr/\~ o~d ". .
_~ I'--- J' ~ J
....... . j~ .fj-f~ 1'].,. ~.~. 4.,,~ . I)/S::J~··~

. I~~ eel ~ ~ {, ~-7 ~ v ~~~-f I; tie.!" ~ ~e7$
.. . q"...-~ ?-~~. Cl· " a- ...~ / a..~.,,5 .u.J. ~.// .~. -e..
u ::s:-+,..:
c.4Id r~-a;:r;. "Q' ~ .::i........ ':.£1 r
:...__..__-:-__L~.. tJ.:rW~_.·t'!- ..•.. .'0./?··Il"""''''' s ~ %.-v~ ...

·..-:;~I. ~~~, (f;;; c;~~!;t;e::;? 2-.
. .t:<v"1 c..5' e-r 0- ~~ e ' fV\-<-e..F.i f b r:::..

. :.. f\-)~·~.rv" ed· JJ 0 -I-~l <Z~'aA ~ a~ fl ,
. Pr0 t,. #' tV"'1 !Ok/o,.'5 .v..f "c'll r"--r.,.,-':f .
... ~'0l ~ 'r!'-vhrc:Ae.. .
__..__.-.. .l.<I~d':tW.d-bN .e(_.~~ -::>/_LjYfJ.J.i ,
.... flu·4~d,..·Q/r\ ;pE {J,<.9S .. 1..6 -'"eo. (~
:': .~. . .;'. ~:9 .,LCD,
:;,': :.~ r~...
.U
M
en >f:,.: C..;;";,,,
>-'1£. ~
~
. :::oa.
to . ,
,\
.
.. -;, " " .. ~. -. ~ .. , .~. ..... ~" .. ¥.. . ¥... .. '... - -. .-
•.. _. ",- ~_.~.".- ...... _.. " -.' .. - ... -. .. , ....
.. . - ...•. _.,._-,,,, -"- -. .,. . ,
.
.~.
"
, . ' . ' "~ .,,'" .
, \;. ;l::' ~ _. __ _. _ __._... : _ __._ ,. _ ~. _ ~-,~._._ -- -.-._~----_. __ .' - .. _. . ~ - , ._ ~- ~
.
. .-~",
00277
... -.--_.-:--.'--'-- --.. _ -, _.-_ _--_. - _ _._----- ._" ." __ ._ - .. ~-- -_._ -----_ .._-....... ._ _..".-._._ _.. ~._ ..
..F
. ';.I
('-~~~'" V1:O~ 0 '7"'k. . . .

. ~" ~ ~.Jv.-fr;
~/p/5 i . ~· ..To~ kt .
.. CQ9~ ec( . 1-. 'dd <7'-v~~, ~,,~i/:~ I/.
~ e;, ~.., t:/ cJ fv! I :V--r -6/( ~ a;..•J r' CL. ~
~. . L;
IJ..-J~ ...et.. (_rr . I ~ /'Y of d/-.j. tV~'-I 4.J~
.ctL{- .~ rv c>;...e-.: ~ . <.6'",/~'> '5 .....
I R· r1'
0- 6.~../ /J et, '5-1 <-" I\~~ct.; ~~

-r (: ~ (~~ 4 {jO---;se;..d k."'-j
:. . . . .a~e-(.. IV\.-e-~ a· '. "
r·.. ··-'-_·_·_-_···..·-·_···· .-...._.. _.... ".._...
, --- .. __ ._- .-. -~ .. ~-... .... ...... - ..... .. '._ ,,- .. . . _. ;.. . .-~ - -
'. .J .. . ....
,'_.,
.--_ .. ' ~ .. .. ' ~ .- ..- .. -. _.
_ ..•. ,., _ . ..:. .•_ .~. • __ ._. _ _ ._ ••• •. - _ . _.•••. '_. . .. __.• -_. -...... . ','.-.'-'.- .~-- ,.,.- ~ •• - ••. ~_.- •.,-. -~-_ ••• _ _ ._~. •.• ..
~' ._ .•.. .. _ .. _ _._#o
····:1·
·:1 _.:.
~ ."
,.
. '.:.
1 ·,·:· "'0" .
;.- .....•. " .
. ;
.... ,
;·4 '. :' ..
.d •.,
,f' . . '00278
,'-1:---- ,.__.. . . --."..,---- -..~_.- . _._- ,. _.._._--:- ~----'- - .. . ""- .._ _00.. . .
\'IL..-.._ _ .': .~
.,'..
. L'·'",.'c.-,;·~:- --'-~'-··~'f:c''''';'~-'i';;;'.--·~- -.•..-.--.- -- - _.
.:.·.·.:'tlJ!j~''',;'clll a·/Y..f'.;'''; ~-e ~.t!P: 4 /
id-r~1 , tJ-t.~·fv~ ~~cI'. I:I~'

·k.Y"I ~ ~6-.; ~ d ~ (A...{~~~fcl j:J_£~
... _..~.'e: ~~
.. .:.... .. ,. :
~ ,_.. _._ .
.'
.-.----.- "-_·';"~_._'_" ~"" . " ' . _ ' - : __ " _ _ A_< •
. -_._-----_......__.. _--_ _-----
.......
... ;"
.
.v
r"
:~, .¥ __ " __ H_"_M ._ ;, A __. • ,-" _ • • -', .• _ ••.• ~_ .••. ,_ ._ ••.• _ •. 'N. _. _
-_.""':-".~-.-.
... , --." .:-_---_:_--.~._-,~-, . ----_ .. __.........
'-_ ... _. --'--'-'--'--"
.,i
. ."
:-":--_~,~.:..~
~~4~':'4I
J)~
'..,.._.:,,._~.~
__ • • • • • •" 0
IINd~
"::_','" ' • .'.;.; ••
(
L.-.. ' (!"p..~." ,
". .
~~~~. ..:' '," .. . . t
~/·~. / f q;-/~ .
_... ..~._~~.wP~ --J,.P"t ~

.CtU
~.
'. i . .
.' :
.~vtll1...a,l( tU.LJ
~ . . ~. _b~( '.
.:{_::~~-~,\t-~"1.~b-'- .
i iA--tf£.
c;-=_ .... ??._.. ~~ __ 1 ... -_'---- __ ._._._. ..c~

t,· . (
• t.
. ....
; C./L/
I,., ," ,."
~~,.e\_ ' .
.
~;(I \..-t.... . .
~ 1/
..•.• <.•...•..~
VJ~;(;) C G)/ I() e-' lil .

..-_._--'_._._.".~..-._---;--f.J~y:hi.
. _,.. " '!'-:-l'-.__ ~_-'-'- -.-.~."!':" ':" """'l~_""~:"L
.__ .._.:_._ ... ~_.:Y.L_"" __ ..,...__ .-;---..,..:~._---
. f"'.. '
C, 0 I --...,f
. .;,·;·;;C'. ;(!?;~ ;',
t
~1~. ;r..~':il.;;~t.../
;'.' ..:;
~ ; -- -.... _...... _. .
.. /.
/
~,.I'.
.._- -~
".... __ .... ,.:';". -" ... _-,-~ .. : ... _. ...... _... - ..:._. ". -... _:...•.
-~
.i
. "
! .'
·~
(
\, ', .. ~. ..•..
:1' ___
~··r f..~.1
.1"'iJ· .,
. . f1•.. . . ;":~·,'i
' . .:...
'
,'.:-.. ~:~: _----_.- ..-.

9 July 1970,' ,~
,The Dire~tqr
advised the DD/'r "that White Housestaffe~i<~~l1sto~
and Presidential Counsellor Pat Moynihan thought well of the
memorandum on "Black Radicalism in the Caribbean." '
10 July 1970
','" Mau:ry;briefeclbnhis meeting yesterday withC6ngressmanRichard
I chord, Chairman of the House Internal Security Committee, who had
asked what:we are doing to investigate "security leaks"connected with
press accounts of Lon Nol's having sold rice to the Communists and
having engaged in .an attempted deal with Hanoi. Maury briefed on his
explanatiOn of why weare doing nothing, since such reports are not
exclusively ,confined to Our information.
1 September c1970
Maury 'noted that the Director sent a letter to Congressman
Moss ontetephone monitoring practices. "',rC;
3 September '1970
The Director' noted a 1 'Septembermemorandum from John ,Bross on
Daniel Elsperg '(sic). He,~sked the, DDS to lift his clearances and
to make th:J.s\fact ltilown in security channels • ,,;,ei;\:., ' '
, 15 October 1970
, ,~, •. ,.,;,.
.. . . ' ';-:~;; •
.:.:,-~i;,r,,',?;;
';" .!.; -i , • ,.
DDS<teported. that,the Weathermen have declaredt~:t~;riJonth for

their fall;offensiveand have mentioned the Agency as;a." (target for
bombings and kidnapping. He briefed on precautionary:,measures
adopted' and:askedsenior officers to vary their route.,t.O·andfrom
work, and to report any peculiar telephone calls orunu8ualevents
around their residence.
28 October 1910
DDP',,;~ported that the FBI desires to check for fingerprints

on all cryptogram messages mailed to high Government officials.
The messages will then be passed toNSA for exploi tati9Il~1 DDP
requested that Agency personnel who receive such messag~s pass
them to him for transmittal to the FBI. ' ,, ,
"'.,",:
~ 'W ' ,(J~'i": ~

~~n Wce.-;;';S ·
,,.t', .
£7~/?1, 00282
;'.':' .
. :<::.~' '-, ~""

. :'; .: ...;- / ,~:"?;::jj',~,'- ~,:.:'.;
' '>-
·':-'.-::·:.-;'.·~-r,j;_FL·-:··'i
I,
"-.:. . _-\.:-.~--:,--: ...., ..:

:_ .
:.,:-,.-;,:.~::_"<::~,-,.:.,:
, DDInoted pressaccounts Of, FBI DirectorJ .E~~rHOoverls

19 November statement that the Black Panthers aresu:p~()rtedbY·
terroristorg~nizations. He said that we have eX8.IIli.,lled the FBI I S
related 'f.i.les, and our own data Q,nd find no indication/'of",any
relationship between the fedayeen and the Black Panthers. 'He
provided ,the Director 'with a memorandum on this topic.
23Decem~r1970
..
Executive Director called attention to the President's.21
December memorandum on "Discloaares of Classified.Information
" ,
,and:C991'dination "and ",CleaIllce of, Official StateI!J~~~~,!}!-,whiCh is,

, , ' ,
be1ieyedto,be the, result of representations bY1:;g~;,:pi.'rector and

Admira:EPAnderson.·,Executive
. _.::_ -. ,'j;-:.".:"_'- :,:.' ' , " . . ' .
Director
-.
said that'he;\!F~ill meet -with,
" , : . -;
':";,::~,,,,;:;;.<C;-';':'_>'_':-":''::'
, select~d"Executi ve,Committee Members next weekt()/"fscuss the

mem0l'aD.dum'SimPlications and to develop recommen.c1a.i:;1QnS ,for,action
by ,i;b~':i'~:i.:l:'ectorinviewofthe special responsibil.i~i.~s placed on
himby,vthe,Pre sident .:";/M\~;~f;::{~~i;,'U·
'.~ ,;.: .
",," .
;;-::=:~i·:_~·-·.;;~·
:': <{':-:.
29 December 1970
;~Jt,ecutive Director reminded Executive Commi~$~~;pa:rticipanis

, about 'the meeting involving most of them this morni.#gonthe
Prwsident,l s directive on disclosure of classified:Lnformation.
":::---" . .. . - --.- -
, 30.ne:ceIilber, 1970"
r'" "
00283'
·.··~·::';t :";:;·:':.'i:.<
" .. '. " .' . ~.
~1, ,/J'f':'::':
.. ,.-...... ,.
, :'", ...,'-:.,
.-,•.~~..;;{~~,:~:~;;;:~.;..._; .• ,~.,.".: c
',:' ,"
.• '.
~ .' - .- - .' "" ..
,>i4:January 1971 ", ·'::(\"I.,.:.. -~
, Bross said tbatbe and Bronson Tweedywtll'bave lunch today with '
,General Bennett, Director ofDIA. The Directorsald that he might ask
Bross to take along a copy of his letter and guidance on the Dis'closures
of,:(:aassifiedlnformation and Coordination and Clearance of OffiCial
Statements but that be first wishes to ciarify wi th the Exe,cutive
Director 's~e of tbe'language in the guidance section.
':18January 1971
Maury said that he anticipates a number of questions from tbe

Hill on the attached article by Jack Anderson in today'sWashington
,,;,Post, "6 Attempts to Kill Castro Laid toCIA.~'.
. . ' , .:. .
,~'f~"
.Houst6n related that he will bavelunch.:t?~ywithAssistant
.AttorneyGeneral Robert C. ~rdian to discuss·~4¢,l)irector'sguide-
<,lines ontbe disclosure of classified informatiqn.
" .
",:'~.;I';#i;.,;,·:iBr6ss
related that Parrott met wi tb G~ri¥~${t·i;nnett to review
'(:'i-t.he'Director' s letter on disclosur~ of Classifie~info~ationand
',said tbat, General Bennett will now discuss it with . Deputy Secretary
,Packard, who may in turn review it with Secretary Laird. The
, ,jDirector asked to be advised of Secretary Packar<;l's reactions and·
Csaidthat he wants tocbeck the final guidance.witb Secretary
'Laird and with someone in tbe" White House . .
before it is issued.
:;,~::::;. DD/P Jack ~lledattentionto AndersOn's'~()iumn

in today's
,Wasbington Post, "Castro Stalker Worked For The CIA. If
..
• t'
\.
,00284,
('--"\ . "'1'July1971'
',. .';Carver noted' that Secretary Laii~';hadreqUestedthatourprintiIl~J' .

.pla:ntas s.ist 'in reproducingtheforty;.sey~~yolwnesecretPentagon shldi .
. on .vietnam for distribution to the' press i,ari:dotl:e rs~hisI!lorning.· This ". "
request was aborted by the Pr'~sident. If . . . . ''''''''{DDeI in'fhe chair)
"
2 July 1971
.' . "DD / S said that in the absence, of I lattendec;l'j

. a meeting at the White House ye~terdayoftheinteragency group which is,
reviewing classification and dec~assificationpolicy. The President spent'
an hour with the group and said that he wants: ••• and (6) the revocation
of all clearances and the return. of all classified material held at Harvard,
BrookIngs,' Rand, and Cal Tech, as .wellasthe withdrawal of Q clearances
.' held by the Regents of the Universityo! California. A brief discussion
·.f~l1owed,:.~nd.theExe(::utiveDirector not~d<that DOD has asked' us to provide
information on all our contracts With Rand, as well as all clearances held .
by.Ran4 personnel for our purposes. Acting Director asked that we assem.ble
" data pertaining to the Pre sident IS remarks but that we' take no action until
the President's guidance has been confirmed and the DD/S has provided a
m.emorandUIn on it. " (DDC! in the chair)
"Carver reported that they will probably complete their detailed reView
o~ the secret Pentagon papers by 6 July. " .
..... "'Varn~r.:called attentiont6Sec'r..etaryRogers' requ~st that the press

permit the. Govermnent to review in~d.vance potentially damaging docu-YJ:lents
'£romthe Pentagon papers. I I ' .
6 Julv 1971
V. t "'Cah'rv~r said that their review of the secret Pentagon study on

.' le narp, as alrilost been completed.",. . . I
00285
......: ....... , .... i....
..!: .
• ."'"
'.,
,f ' ..... ' ...
. , ./
'. (
..... 7 July 1971
i
I. ,IICarver' said that he will be atte~ding meeting toc-a.y called by sistant a As

. Secretary of Defens e' for Public Affairs Daniel Htm.lqll. He added that he "
" ' asswnes it will concern the declassification of some of the' secret Pentagon' .
papers and.. that, if it does, he Will seek·the Director's advice." (DDe! in c.hai
"At the Executive Director's .request, the DD!S aareed

0
to D
aet toaether
o.
with the DD/S&T and General Counsel to prepare a briefing paper for the
Director on where we stand with resp~c~ to classified materials at Rand
c:nd, efforts to' safeguard them.. Ii .
.
"
, '.'Maury reported that Congressman :Mahon would like to meet with the
Director on 9 July to discuss the Pentagon papers and various world hot'suots
Carver said that he will prepar:e a briefing paper for the Director on the .
Pentagon study. "
"Carver briefly noted! ~oncern over the

, '..r
revelations in the Lansdale '=r.n=-:::e-=m=-=-o--=-r=-a-n-d·u.rn-·-,-w.---'hi·~ c---.-h-w-as-s-u-r-f.....aced· as part of
.:- .~.
:.i,! the Pentagon papers." '

I
~ ....- .. '
8 July 1971
i
l '.'DD/S,reported that a DOD security team is gobg to Santa 1vlonica
;. r
I , to repossess classified Defense'nial:~ria:ls held at Rand: He 'suggested that,
,,
,.1
I ..
,lj'... :,.'. . .'

." _. _
... ..,..;
.
~i: .".';•.i' ~
I ,
. i '. '.'
"
. rather than take. parallel action~we send a Security Officer to observe
the operation 'and b.ventory Agency 'mate rials in the possession of Rand•
. ·1· .
I
~. .
,
: ,In res pons e to the Director's question he expb.ined tha.t we ha v~ sa ven.
contracts With Rand; only one. iscl.assiiied, and it is 'with Rand's Washing-
ton office, although some material could have been sent to Santa :Monica.
The Dire~tor concurred and requested a review todaterm.ine the essen- '
tiality of cu'rrent pi.-~posedcontractswith Rand. Houston conunented' tha.t,
according to DOD General Counsal Buzhardt, DOn.is technically under
instructions to lift 'the secudty clearances of RaD:d contractors but has
taken no action. nnC! repo::oted tha.t J o.!.'n Eb-.:rlic~~~he;lJ~l~.Ep..?J~.~,?- .•~~ .
c:d~s ~_~..~~! ..!!:z....~!,~.g9~.~ ~__!~~.P.2.m!!P;&.JP!.~~.;~~...f!.4. ..~g;;tP.'+9.Y~::t ...g9~~~d ,
Hunt as a 5 ecurit'l consultant. Lat~r in the meeting the Director asked all
Executive Comm.ittee .
me~bersto
.
review their lists of consultants to de- .
termine whether each is really needed•. "
''!' "Carver brie£e~ on his rne'eting yesterday with Assistant Secretary' .

.,' . 'of Defens'e for Public Affairs Daniel Henkin and noted that any further .
exc~sions from the text of the secret Pentagon papers xnust be prC?vided
by ,Monday. He added that no decision .has yet been m.ade on whethez:.to
:. ,
release to the. public the volumes .or a version thereof.; The Director not'ed
. j:• •
that we should oppose any such c'ourse of a~tion." 00286""
'.
", '~>- .. "
. 16 July 1971
I .... •. 1m
" .~.
Carver said that s most appreciative oi the time

which Houston spent W1.th hiiriyesterday•
... .
.,..._.. ".....: ,,:.);i::~\~:'
9 July 1971 ::~'!": ;\~R}:~,'~N(~,'.· .'
i;-~::::~; ~,~,~.;;':
. ' "In 'response to ~h~)J?ire~tor's question Carver reportea th~t~~~~~;~()£ .....
lin the.;ew Y"orkTuh::~~;~dl~~~: ~:'::te~~nt~t~::a::~t~:l:tj~~~~ed

·a complete copy of theforty;..sevenvolurnes
----,---_I
L - - , . . - - -_ _
16 J\.I.ly 1 971
"Carver reported that the book which General Lansdale has 'been'
writing for a year anda.half is n~w in' the hands of the publisher, with some
mi:::1or changes bei::lg made. in light of revelations resulting from the publica-
tion of .the secret Pentagon papers. In 'response to the PD/PI S question
:;~~~ri:~~:t::i~~ =ig~.be"bleto a>'range for us to read the teXt:~~\ {
"Tweedy noted thaf'a.t\Vhite House request a PFIAB co~itte~c~tn~
posed of Franklin Lincoljl;>Dr. William Baker, ald Frank Pace wi.ll:~d.er
take a damage assess1llel1t'of the publication of the secret Pentagon~ipfitrs.
He added that the committee will want to hear from us and spoke of plans
for Houston and Carver to unde.rtake this task. II
20 Julv 1971
"Tweedy reported;i~n,~telephonecall from .Andy Marshall a~cl;;·ii~a.;id

that lvlarshall and Rand.!Pre.sident Henry>Rowen are brooding about the"
security proble~
in Rand~
lYfarshall eXpressed a desire to . [ taL~Viitb:,6~e
of our senior security o£.£icers when he next visits'Washington in orq.el"to
get a feel for securitypra.ctices in general.' Executive Director adYi.sed
a'gainst our getting out front ill terms o£advising a major DODcont:.i:aetor
. on security. The Dir~ctor approved and requested that re respond to Mr.
:M.arshallls request in low key and that 'the meeting be held in.thi~ b'7i1q.ing.
lI
, ..'
.f2 July'1971 {the day Howard Hunt caIne to see General Cush...-nan}
.
II <;,a.r.ve.:::...highlighted.. bi ~, S:";3 $; t)p~e..;t..e.J;da,.y_\Yi~..tlli.<;Jtaife !"·D a-vi. d

·,....·Young, who..i s. ~B s istingJ olY}_~ll...tlli:JE?~;t~.i.~.-~Y.i ..~&..,t!~·~~~£-~~~~~~~:::g on .
.
papers., II ". ,
,
'23 July 1971
,.~
• . "Carver highli~htea his, Houston's, and I Isession with th~'ld

. ~FIAB com.m:itt~ewhich is undertaking a damage assessment of the publi2a-
bon of the secretPen,tagonpapers. (See lvforninO' MeetinO' Minutes of 16 July
.197l~) '. 0 b , '.'.
6 August 1971
I The Director cailed attention to the article by Michael GeUer in today's

Washi:p,gton J?ost,. "CIA.Patrols Into China Said Halted, "-and directed (1)
that Maury write a letter .for his signature to Senator Stennis making it clear
that Senator Case was' briefed on t~s topic and obviously leaked it; (2) that
Maury brief Carl March on the background, including the fact that these opera-
tions were not terminated because of the President's projected trip to Com- ,
munist China but because, ,certain aspects of them were previously exposed in j
the press; ,(3) that the DireCtor'of Security (who was present at the lvlorning
Meeting) get additional background from :NIaury and see White House staffer
David Young; (4) -that Goodwin reply to queries by saying that \ve know nothing
about this matter; (5 fth~tJlouston and Maury utilize this iIicident in any
material prepared for his use in opposing the Cooper biil; and (6) that the
DDCl brief Dr. Kissinger or :Gene.ral Haig on this matter today.
.::* 13 August 1971

.. .
. Knoche called attention .to the article by Tad Szulc iIi today' s New York
Times, II Soviet Move to Ayert War Is Seen in Pact with India, " and said that
the material contained therein on'the reason for Foreign 'Minister Gr.omyko's
visit to New Delhi isclearlyfrorn highly classifiedCS material•. The A-DDP
noted·his concern over this breach of security.
16 'August 1971
\ ,A-DDP noted. that the articl . b T . ' .. " .' . '

'Attempted PrO-Soviet Coup in Y e . y. , .ad Szulc In Sunday's New York Timas
from a TDGS. The :Direct
.
k emen IS Reported, /I co:ntai~~tion':" '
or as ed that he call thi t th' .
H OUse stafi~r David Young. so' e attention of White
,r....
00289
" .'
. " ..... ..
- ',~--' .:' ..
"--\~ ~:.- -~:-, - ,
.. .. ::"". '''''--. -~ .. ...~~--' ~", .. ,
.-.~ ..:,.,::.i.y
,
i "'''.
,~ : ~' ..;. ..
"'., / .. ..
\8 August 1971 .
A-DDP noted that he has reported to \v-hite Housesta£f~l"I>~vidYoung

\
on the resultsottheDeputyDirector of Security's surveyoft~()!:n:~,'\Vhosaw \
the classified assessment upon which Tad Szu1c. based his 13Aug~~t'article
(see Morning ~eeting Minutes of 13 August 1971). ;'~* ..' .' .
19 August 1971·'
"Maury briefed on ,White House stai£er Jor.:l Leh..-nan'srequestfor o~r

. . d t rrnininawhat four volumes of the secret Pentagon paper.,
aSSistance 1n e e £., bI" t" He
0
Senator Gravel reportedly provided to Beac~n Press pu l.ca ~on. . 0;
noted that Paul Chretien ofOTR,is an acqua1ntance oftll:5.enat(),:,";Cl.nd n:~Y be
. t .C . said that the four volumes probaDly pertaln to ellorts
able to aSS1S. arver . 1 t · d th r"'in
\ to neO'oti3.te a settlement and outlined the sensitive matenacon aln.e.

Houston ,recommended against our involvement in thi; matter a~d su;gested
that the Department of Justice query Beacon Press. Maury.. s.a1d tha_the
e - .
DireCtor'instructedthat we do. nothing until :Maury.c°:tlfJults "lJ1.thCl~rk 1

:M3.cG:-e d o r , Counsel-to the President for Legislat.1vean~Congressl0na1
. . o. h .. s '0'ut of town 'and will not return untll th.e fu-st()f next weeK.
Af.faIrs, W .01 . • .f . J h L luna=t
In the m'~a.ritirrie, :Maury noted tp.at heWll: deterITllner~m.on.. e . ~;
whe.ther~heY have, considered consu.~ting tne Depar~en,"o~g:b~t:~:~:e~~:ir)
matt~r. I.
20 August 1971
, }
,,
'.'MaurY said that he c'aUed'\Vhite House staf.£e,r~ohn Lelunan yesterday
h and cite~,:'U~e"Co<iewhichwould permit the Justicep~partInenttogo after the

four volumes'ofthe s~cret Pentagon papers reportedly given' to Beacon Press.
Lehnian'sreactioriwas that, since there is an existing policy preventing the
use of subpoenas on this matter, he still hopes we wiltassistindetennining
what Senator Gravel may have given. Beacon Press" TheDDCI asked Maury
not to utilize PaulChretie'n's entree 'to the Senator without prior consultation
With the Director, and Carver com..--nented that he is opposed to our involve- .
ment (see'~orning~leetingMinutes of'19 August 1971." (DDCI in the chair)
23 Aug'.l.st 1971'
\ .' , liThe Director reviewed for Houston a conversation. he had with a

,<o.ung la~wyer who has reviewed the secret Pentagon~,papersin response to
/tne ..~l1shc:e Depa~tmentls efforts to prosecute. According to this attorney,
~us,"lce ch~ not Clte the appropriate provisions of the Code' and has pre~ented
lts case poorly. II
" ~._. - ..
00280'
10 November 1971 ":";.':'::'
:,"
.·Iebman,said. ,that this is "leakday"in thewa.~~ington PQstand

called attemtion to the foiloWing articles: "Mao"f.> Heir, Lin; ,
Apparently Out in Power Shuffle" by Stanley Karn9",,"'North Vietnam's
Next Mov:e" by Evans/Novak, and "lin Piao is 'Finish,=d'U by Joseph
Alsop (attached). He notedthat,while the article by Stanley
Karnow provides good coverage of the topic, it hass, 'State, Department
flavor. He also recalled that on ~5 October we disseminated
inf'ormation similar to that contained in 'the EvaJ,1s/Nova~article.
'He, mentioned that" the Alsop ,ari'icle is probably the most damaging,
since it includes material I
\The Director notedll;J1in,sto, do something

'--a::-;b.-o=-u--;t;:---;,tc.-h:-:;i;-:s=-=p-:::r:-=o'i:"b.....le-::-:m~b;:-:u-::-:t;:--:a--,d;-:cv=-Jised the A-DDP to cope wi th any adverse
re~ction'l. - ~y' noting ~he large;'V()J.~e of reports '
on the politl.ca-l::situation in CommunJ.st China.<"
11 November 1971
In response to the Director's.question Gal."Ver'saidthatsome work

requested by John Ehrlichman is pending. The Director asked to be
filled in later on the detail:s.
Lehman said that Jack' Anderson's column in,tod,ay' sWashiIigton

PPBt,~'Hussein:'HelporI'll Go on a Ghazou,.'~:";9.on"tains verbatim
'laiiguagefrom~anExDismessage, from King H;uss.~:i.~,to'the·'President
a:ad. added that, he is looking into the' distri'tiutfpIiofthis message.
,',
28 December 1971;
, \
A-DDI called attention to Jack Anderson's columns in yesterday's
and today's Washington Post (attached). Henotedth!3-t the 27 December
. piece contained material from. three SALT ExDis. ,memcons and added
thattoa.a.y's column contains quotes from a State LimDis cable and
'::twc;:»TDCSs. A brief discussion followed" tb.~>P:I:>;g(Ob,servingthat,,
if,these security breaches continue, we will have ,to limit severely
the ,distribution of ~ensitiveintelligenceinformation.
",., ".
,0029.1
,
7 January '1912 I .
. . Maury said that 'according to Frank Sl1ltinshek,. Cha1:;rman

'Nedzi will rely on us rather'heavily for SUPP0l"t during his hearings
.on the problem of classification and handling of Government . ,
inf.ormation (see Morning Meeting Minute s of 6 January 1912) • The
Director encouraged Maury to see Chairman Nedzi next week, and
,:{iouston sugg~,r:lted that,the Chairman be provided with the Rehnquist
study.
DDP briefed on work under,way to limit distribution of reports

~and noted that C/FIis completing a review of
'----:s:-:it=-=e:::p:-::s:-::w>:'bTi:::'chl::"""":m::"lir.g;;'lllll:;-:,t=---O;b"".e,......-:o:-,t8.ken'to restrict dissemination of sensitive
reports from all sources.
,
.. !lJanuary 1912
,. . Maury related that Frank' Slatinshek forbackground i.i~~~Sing

materials pertaining to past efforts or stlidies related to the
classification and control of information.·:lIeadded that he and
Hou~ton will meet with the .Director latertdaayt9 discuss the
. availability ·of the Rehnquist s t u d y . '
.1.2, January i912
. . Mal:/llYJ. Briefed on his anfl. Houston's session witb FraDk

S!atinshek and their provision of a largevolwne of material on
past efforts tqdevelop et'fectlve espionage,Mlaws.
Houston noted the President's nomina¥¥q40f Henry E. Petersen

:to become Assistant Attorney General incha':r:gEf, of .the crminal
• . •
. . "<""-.';,. ", ",- ,,",' -.' ,... c, •
:Division of the JtisticeDepartment. He observed that Mr. Petersen

.·has· been .most helpful to the Agency in the;p3.st,.pa.rticularly
.on the Itkin' case. . . . .
13 January!91 2
. . . Maury noted that the draft revis10n, of Executive Order 10501,

.. "SecurityClassification Procedures, "whichisbe,ing circulated
by the .NSD staff for comment, is a follow 'on to the Rehnquist study.
" :.18 January 1912 ,
".. . D D I called attention to the article in.t6day's New York ,Times,

... "Nixon Acts to End Security leaks." (Excerpt: "lB.stJuly, two
'members of the White House staff, David R. Young of the Nationai
, Security Council and Egi.1Krogh Jr. of the J)omestic Council, . were
1"''#
',,,
/'asked to investigliteearlier leaks and prevent recurrences."}
•
",
. .
, I
00292
( .....
·'3 February 1912

A/DDS reported the House. Appropriations Committee request for
a finance officer to assist them in work on the budget. He added
that we have provided such assistance in the past" and the Director
interposed no objection. .
1 February 1912
Houston explained that no action will be taken in the near
future with respect to the Hans Tofte case" since the judge! has
been stricken with hepatitis.
ti February 1912
DDI noted the article by Michae1..~tJ.er in Today's Washington
Pos~" "New Spy Satellites 1iim1" Plannedfc:>:t'Clearer" Instant Pictures."
later in the meeting the" Director askeidthe DDS to advise the
Director of Security to undertake an investigation of this leak of
EOI-related information and to convenei;heUSIBSecurityCommittee.
11 February 1912
Carver noted his handling of Whi~e' Hcmse staffer Sven Kraemer's
request to'FBIS for material concemingU~S. POW's. TheDirector
reminded Executive Committee members of Dr. Kissinger's request
that any inquiries from elements of the White. House staft' be referred
to his staff for conveyance to the Agency ~
Houston highl:Lghtedthe meeting·withJohnEhrlichman on the NSC

draft Exec~tive Order on security classi:fication. He noted the
relate4 article by Sanford Ungar intoday'sWashington Post, "NSC'
"Urges Stiffer law On S e c r e t s . " " .
16 February 1912
Lehman noted plans to continue briefing Attorney General

Mitchell" .whose resignation ise~fective 1 Narch. "
Houston related that White House "staffer David Young has

invited him to review another ~ draft of the new Executive
Order on security classificatio~.
r'
.....
'. .-;:--,.. :
002$!J'"
..
(
"'.
••1
I
"1
. ~.
2~ February 1 9 1 2 "
secu~~~~t:c=ndtba~eh;i~C ::eur 1nl:~~Ynen;~~~t~;e

Order on classification, in light of their undeJ!tanding with NSC
.' .'. ' .. ;~ .
staffer David Young, that some of the features df the Executive
Order may not materialize. A briefdisBussion followed and the
Director asked Houston to review the matter with him.
:~
2 March 1912
Houston reported that the draft Executive Order on classification

has undergone a few minor changes. He noted Director's letter to John
Ehrlichman, dated 1 December191l"wit~ respect to our position on
problems related to declassii'icationand suggested that a copy be
prOVided David Young, NSC s~ffer~After a brief discuss*on, the
Director interposed no objection. .
b March 1912
The Director noted his' memorandum to the Deputies and Independent

Office Heads, subject: "Allegations ofAssassina1;ions." He asked
that i t be mentioned at Staff ~eetings.
21 March 1912
. The :pirector said that th~,President has seen his 11 February

memorandum on reducing'disclosures.of.classifiedintelligence and
directed the White House staff to prepare a memorandum urging that. all
agencies comply with proper disclosure procedures.
22 March 1912
Houston reported that he 1sscheduled to meet with John

Ehrlichman this morning.
23 March 1912 :,:" .': ".' :
Maury reported that, after checking with Egil Krogh of the

Wh~te Housest8:ff, he has made arrangements to brief Congressman
Le~r Wolff of New York on the Agency's role in international .
narcotics control. . '.' .
~"
,....
,/
i
00294
!. ;;;:'
" :
1 May 1972 .' -.",'
2 May 1972,
DDS reported that the. Director of Security has received a request

from the ,Secret Service for cOUnteraudio technicians to support
the President's trip to Mosclbw: The Director concurred.
11 May 1972
Houston noted hisco!'respondence~thWhite House ,staffer

David Young pertaining to'9p.rprobleIDswith Executive Order 11652
and added that Mr. Young'~6,acceptedbU:r position on about 90
percent of our problems:w1.th the implementing draft directive.
24 May 1972
Houston explained that he had obtain,ed White House Staffer ,',

, David Young',sunderstanding that wewi;Ll not meet the 1 June deadlin?f
for producing internal Agency regulations implementing the N S C ,
directove on ExecutiveOI'der 11652. ,kbrie1' discussibnfo11owed on '
:.
the cumbersome bookkeeping,and declassification authorities which,
may be required. The Director observed that the topic was
sufficien.tlyimportanti'or}lEt;tobe inn,o great rush to meet a 1
June deadline and Houstbn';assured him that Mr. Young understands.
b June 1972
Thuermer explained that he will continue working with the'

General Counsel in response to Charles Nesson 1 s efforts to serve a
subpoena on him in connection with the Ellsberg case. He noted the
related article by RobertA. Wright ,in today's New York Times,
"Hearing Is Asked In Ellsperg Gase. ll
7 June 1972 ,:~.~ ..... :~:' .. ~
, Houston noted a, letter from the Justice Department conveying a ' .

subpoena dire,cted toArigus Thuermerin connection ,with the Ellsberg" '"
case. ,Hehighlightedthe::'schedule of documents requested, mO,st of'
which were mentioned infbotnotesto the Pentagon papers. He noted.
'plans to ask Justice to'decJ.B.re the material irrelevant to the case.
,...." .. ;: ...:
\- ~~. ;.
.'."
"
"''--' .-'
(j June 1972
,.
Houston said that he will be ,attending a meeting called by'

DOD General Counsel BUzhardt, who is recommending that Justice drop
the' case against Daniel Ellsberg.
.'
19 June 1972
Tne Director noted the 17 June arrest of James W. McCord a.nd

four others who were apprehended at the Democratic National Committee
headquarters at the Watergate.. With the Director of Security prest::lnt
to provide biographic details, the Director made it perfectly clear
that responses to any inquiry with respect to McCord or Howard Hunt,
who may be implicated, ~re to.be limited to a statemen~ that they
are former employees who retired in.~ August and Ipril 1970 . .<
respectively. The Dir.ector asked that this guidance· be disseminated
via .staff meetings .,,~eDirector asked. that any inquiry from other·
elements of the goverIlIIlentbe referred· to the Director of Security
who is to be the focal point. Inquiries from the press are to 00<
referred to Mr. UnumbWho'may say that McCoro worked in the Office",!'>
O.f Security. The Director noted that we have no resp~nsibility
with respect to an investigation e~cept to be respons~ve to the
"';<;;'\.•.•
" .
EM FBI's request for name traces. It Was noted that Howard Hunt·· " '.
may have done some work· since retiremellt in connection with the. 'j" ., •.•. \
preparation of supporting material for some awards. The Executive' !
Director was asked to review this topic and report to the Direct()r~
20 June 1972
In response to·tberDirector' s request~ the Director of Security

highlighted developments over the past twenty-fourhours.with
respect to'the McCord/Hunt, et al., situation. He noted that the ...
late edition of the.NewYork Times carries a different story by Tad
Szulc than that whicha.ppeared in the edi.tion received here 1- '...
(attached). The Director of Security anticipates some inquiries on'
Bernard L. Barker's Situation, and it was noted that Mr. Barker
was hired by the. Agency in 1960 and terminated in 1966. The Director'
I
complimented Unumb on his handling of inq'\liries and asked thatf\iture
inquirieS be metwi1-h>,aresponse confined to the fact that,now.that .
we have acknowledged that both McCord and Hunt are fOrn'ler Agency'" .
employees, we know n,otliing more Gbout the case and the caller .should i
be referred to theFBIEl,s appropriate.
,.'
002·96
20 June 1972
DDS noted that. in respons~ to State I s request its
who drive the "Secretary of State andotheJ;' senior State
will be givena6ne-daydefensive driving orientation at
ma
20 June 1972
The Directo;r .notedreceipt of a paper on a safehouse. i.n .
Miami which is being made avaiiable to the Secret Service in' support
of its work in connection with the Republican and Democratic'
National Conventions. He asked the ADDP and the DDS to make. it
absolutely .cle~rl I that ou: cooperati0I?- in. ~h!;~,,> .
undertakingis·to:. be conf'ined to provisJ.on of the safel,louse"~Ild
that it is not;tobe used as a site for investigations, in~i,J;'ogations,
or "wa lk-ins",et6. The Director added that we will notloap.:'·i: .
people to the]fBI· or Secret Service in connection with their'.
responsibili t$~f!i.;!it .the Conventions nor will we provide equiPment
unique to the}.'gency. ',Jlf~(r
,"t···.··"
21 June 1972
In view of·the.cqverage in today's New York Tim~s and Washington
Post, Maury recoIIlIDended that Chairman Nedzi be briefedonthEfMcCord
affair and that·this briefing include all our information about the
c@:.hers involved. The Director asked Maury to touch base ,with the
. Director' pf. Se.c~rityand prepare a briefing paper on this.tC>J?iC for
his review.Citillg:thenumber of distorted rumors about,tp:i.'s·
matter, the Exec::utive :Director said that. during the course'qi'·the
day he hopes to provide a suggested Headquarters Bulletinfdrall
employees· for ~heDirector's review.' . .
Unumbnoted a nliIilber of inquiries from the press witli~~spect

to the Cuban-Americans involved in the bugging attempt at the
Democratic National Committeeheadquarters and their alleged' .
involvement in the. Bay of Pigs,etc. The Director asked,tha't such
inquiries' l:>emet .with an explanation that we are not prepared to be
helpful onthfsmatter.
00297
22 June. 1972,
UnUmbobserved that inquiries on the McCord/HUntsituation

seem to bes1a~kening off.
23 June 1972
The Director called D/oCI I s attention to coverage of the McCord

affair in the Metro Section of today's Washington Post and asked that
future issues of the "CIA Operations Center MorriingNewspaper
Highlights" include press items on this topic. . .
Maury noted that he briefed Chairman Nedzi on the McCord/

Hunt situation and on a security case.
26 June 1972
Houstonnote.d the Fensterwald Freedom(of Information case •

1he Director endorsed his plans to concur ~n the FBI's release of
threephot6sj one being of Lee Harvey Oswald, which we~eJlcquired
in MexicoaridpreviouslY.furnished
. . . .. to the Warren Commission.
. "
,J
"_. S'/'
, "
00298
Ii '
'I
"5 Juii; "1972

lIouston.,' called a ttentionto the judge's ruli~i:';iIlthe'El~sberg!
Russo case denying the ~ defense motion for'aIl"evidentiary
bearing, as a result of which the subpoena directed atCIA'is '
suspended.
: 1.1 July 1972
DDI noted press attention, attached to Secreta~yof Commerce

Peters()n'splanned trip to the. Soviet Union and observedthat'r-------,
secre ryass~gne
'-m;;--\iIa15O"H'515'rovcnrtl-'to the Pre sident for
International Economic Affairs, continues towor~forhimandmaygo
to the Soviet Union. She will be in a LWOP status during the '
remairider of ller tenure with the'Secretary. ,"
>(Carverre'called that we have providEld soinebriefings to Senator,'

Eagleton 'on Vietnam. The Director .said that intiiDe.we will receive
instructions from the White House on briefing Senators McGovern
and- Eagleton.
. - '... .'
2()i~lY1972
, ' Houston reported that the Justice Department is anxious that
'no,coxlmJentbemade on the Ellsberg!Russo trialalldthat any, '
'inqo.iries .should be referredt,o the Justice,DePartnient's 'PubliC
Rehtions'Office.
24'July 1912
, '
'Houston noted that he had called David Young's attention to

the fact ~hat the White House (NSC Staff) is not utilizing the new
c~ssification procedures.
- .:,: ...
" ,'Maury 'reported that according to WhiteHg~d~:'gtafferJohn

'~hman,DaVid:Young is of the opinion tha,t Est:l.matesare subject to
declassification after ten years. Houston Will see Mr. 'Young to
s'traighten him out on this topic. ',
,
,"
- ::~ :- ,....... .
I ' . ' _
00299
··f._
1 '
,"26 July ,1972

"
The Direc1ior • • • went on to ask the Dl)s for ,the background
'of a decision to haveI 101' the Office ()fSecurityaccompany
Fred Flott on a White House survey of the drug sc'ene in Southeas't
Asia.' The Director said that in the future'hi$or the DDCI' s
prior approval will be required in all cases where the Agency
, . is asked by the White House or any other element of the Government
to send an Agency officer on a narcotics-connected mission.
27, July 1972

, DDP reported that Cord Meyer advised Bud Krogh of the White
Houses~ff of our unwillingness to have, I, "Iaccompany a new
narcotics survey team to Southeast Asia and the possibility that
. Krogh may call the Director to reclama.,~~Directorbriefedon
the background of this decision and noted';h1sconversation with
AlHaig on this t o p i c . '
1 August 1972
from the Secret Service reques~ng

DDS rela.1ied that M r . D o f t h e S t a f f received a call
our training film on ,defensive
driving. The Director interposed no objectiontomaki~ this
, , film available.
8 August 1972
Houston reported that 'Judge McArdle,!g~hted a'motion for
,'summary judgment in the Tofte case. ';;C:' ", '
21 August 1972
Houston noted a telephone call fromE:oward Huntwllo"explained
that his at~orney was with him and had a question about a friend's
past affiliation with the Agency. I ' lDI?/sec, has ' ,
reviewed the, employment, and Houston reporteatbat he replied '
directlbyto Hunt's friend, Mr.1 ',' , Ithat his old
affiliation should create no problems in'connection with his
, appearance' before a grand jury. "
;....
.. '
00300
'. . .
/"
22 August 1972
Thuermer reported on a call from a Mr. Crewdson of ,the New York

Times who said he was "formally reQuesting" a photograph of Howard
Hunt. The DDP observed that we are under no obligation to provide
a photograph, and Thuermer said he had declined.
23 August 1972
DDI noted a letter from the McGovern campaign headquarters
reQuesting the FBIS ~ daily white book and any recent studies on
Southeast Asia. A brief discussion followed and the lttter will be
disregarded. .A,
14 September 1972
Maury reported on his conversation with Messrs. Flug and Epstein
of Senator Kennedy's staff in response to the ~ Senator's 18'
the Director a 1 . r conta~tr
(for detaJ.1J see OLC'S
L.""-.............,,"""'r.;;;;;;~;v;;;----,=,;~-o;;:;.,,..-;:v:;;;rr,-----------,------'
> Thuermer noted that WhiteHouse staffer David Young will hold a
meeting today to brief the press on the implementation of Executive
Order 11652.
,21 September 1972
Warner reported that Marchetti's lawyers have been in touch with

Justice in .connection with ACLU's filing a secret brief with the
'Supreme Court and said that the Office of Security will pick it up
as a conv~ence to Justice.
Warner noted that the Director is one of several defendants in ~

a civil· case filed by Ellsberg and Russo.
Unumb Qoted a request from the National Observer forbiographic

data on Howard Hunt and James McCord inconriection with a story they
are doing on the watergate incident. The Director endorsed his
" having pro'llided only the dates these individuals left the Agency.
25 September '1972
The Director noted a ca;1..1 from Assistant Secretary.of State

. SfscoJ
1
..........
. 18 Oc.tober 1972
Maury noted his response to a request from CSC General Counsel
Anthony Mondello, who was reacting to a request for the personnel
files of those former Agency officers involved in the Watergate
incident from Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee on Administrative
Practices and Procedures. He added that we are exempted from
related CSC regulations, and the Director endorsed his plan to
prov~ only the ~ates of their departure from the Agency in the
event the Senator's office calls us on this matter.
3 November 1972
Houston recalled that last August he reported ona call from
Howard Hunt and his subsequent guidanC~ Ion how
to handle affiliation with the A.gency,. I
The Director highlighted his conversation with David Kr~ldw

of the Washington Star News and his flat denial of a proposed story
that the ·Agency was asked to :r.eporton•.the Democratic .Party which
led to the Watergate incident and- others. The Director noted his _
plans to issue a statement of denial if such a story. were to appear
and su~gested that ThQ:!rmer consider drafting one for contingency
use •..
15 Novembe+ 1972
DDP noted a report from Chief, WH Division that on -9 October a
Mr. HarPer of the New York Times "Was working on a story which tries
to link the Agency with Cuban emigres, the break-in at the Chilean
Embassy, action against Daniel Ellsberg, and the Watergate case.
TbUermer observed that this is the first he has heard about this topic,
and. the DDP concluded that such.a story could baveno basis in fact
and it would be inadvisable to try to straighten o1itMr • Harper.
20 November 1972
DDjI called attention to Jack Anderson's column in today's
Washington Post and the quotes contained therein from an Agency
report on a famous singer. The Director highlighted his brief
conversation with Jack Anderson and explained that the Director
of Security is looking into this. matter.
,.
00302
" ,
.,r......
(
'. ~ ...
22 November 1912
Warner related that according to Assistant Attorney General

Henry Petersen, U.S. Attorney Earl Silbert has several'questions on
the Watergate case. The Director indicateihe will review this
matter later •
. 12 December 1972
Tbuermer noted an inquiry from, Dave Burnbamof the New York

Times, who appears to be writing a story on the twelve New York
Police officers who were briefed by the Agency on information
processing. A brief discussion followed, and Thuermer will advise
Burnham that we have occasionally provided briefings at the request
of various police organizations, but ~heie are exceptional cases.
13 December 1912
The Director noted the' article by Thomas B. Ross in yesterday's

Evening Star-News, "New WatergateD~mension?," and the impression
left therein that the Agency was involved in the Watergate incident
because a passport bearing the" name Edward Hamilton was found on
Frank Sturgis. Any inquiries from the press or elsewhere are to be
met with a "this is nonsense lf reply. The Executive Director noted work
under way to identify the genesis of the passport story.
29 December 1912
UnUlIlp reported that SeYmour Hersh of the New York Times, who
is preparing a story on the. Watergate incident, had asked if
Martinez had been emploYed by the Agency. Acting DCI recommended
that the Agency not assist Mr. Hersh's efforts.
'.
00303
10 January 1913
Maury relBtedthat we will be on firm ground in responding to
Congressman Koch if we indicate that our assistance to the NY City
Police Dept. was not training but a briefing on an essentially
unclassified basis undertaken in response to the suggestion of a
consultant to the N.Y.P.D. Thuermerreminded those concerned that
______________Iis a former Agency employee.
12 January 1913
15 Jama ry 1913
Maury noted press. stories that Watergate defendant Martinez·
was on the Agency pay roll until 17 June and anticipated some
inquiry on this topic. The DDP endorsed his view that M Vhereas
Martinez ~s intermittently used as a .source to report on Cuban
exile mateers, this relationship should cause no serious difficulty.
11.January 1913
The Director called attention to the article by James Reston
"The Watergate Spies" contained in the New York Times, and wondered
how Reston .got the errOfJeous impression that Hunt was II • • • .
Operational head of the CIA' sCuban Bay of Pigs • • • "
18 January 1913
Ma~ry reported that when he and Dave Blee, Chief/SB, saw
-
Chairman Nedzi with respect to the Chairman's forthcoming trip to
Fi~nd, Leningrad, Sofio..and Aghens, Chairman Nedzi briefed on
. . .
his November conversation with New York Times correspondent Seymour
Hersh. Maury went on to highlight the several topics and allegations
.
Hersh claims he has with re spe ct to Agency activitie s,

particularly allegations that we are· enga,ed. in extensive domest.ic
operations. ·Maury will circulate a memorandum on.the information
Hersh claims he has. The Director explained that we should assemble
a ,senior team to meet with Chairman· Nedzi and clearly outline what we
do and do not do in the United States. The Executive Director
called attention to his 29 February 1912 memorandum to the deputies,
.Subject : Allegations of Agency involvement in the US, and suggested .
that it might serve as an outline for material to be covered with
Chairman Nedzi.
":00304
"--~, . ---
- /"
-;L8 January 1973

Maury noted .that"in response to Tom Korolog1s' (Special Assistant
tJt1Mto the President for Legislative Affairs (Senate)) request for
materials on instances where classified information had been leaked
to the press, he assembled a paper on this topic and provided it with
a note than an examination of most. leaks reveals that ~ the White
House and Executive Branch are the guilty parties.
19 January 1973
Maury reported that Chairman Nedzi would like the full
Subcommittee on Intelligence Operations to hear a presentation by
us on Agency activitity in the United States sometime i~ mid-February.
The Director noted. that his decision of yesterday to turn out a senior
team for this briefing stands.
22 January 1973
General Walters noted Howard Hunt's appearance on television
last night. Thuermer will obtain a transcript of the program, and the
Executive Director noted his conce~ over Hur:(tt's suggestiontbat he is
no longer boupd by his secrecy agreement.
I
23 January 1973
.
Executive Director noted that the terminal secrecy agreement
which Howard Hunt signed said that he will be acknowled~ed as an
Agency employee. His ass{tion that he is not bound by the·agreement
because we did in fact acknowledge his employment here is therefore
ill-advised.
The Director noted a call from Elliot Richardson asking about

sane information that Seymour Hersh has developed to the effect that "
HEW automatically prOVides the Agency with travel orders on its
employees and that this agreement was made in Secretary Ribicofi" s
time. The DDIwill determine what this is about and advise.
24 January 1973
.'. MaUry noted that he met with Congressman Koch on our minimal
assistance in briefing the.New York City pmlice officers. The
Congressman would like something in writing on this, which Maury will
prepare and -sign.
00305
·,
24 January 1973
Thuermer noted advice from a former Agency employee that'

Seymour Hersh bas been assigned full time to the watergate story, but
in the meantime, Mr. Hersh claims he has evidence of Agency interest
in an arsenal in the Midwest, a map-making facility in Vermont, and
in Camp Peary.
26.January 1973
The Director noted he has' advised the Director of Training of

Mrs. Lyndon Johnson's request for Marie Chiarodo to handle the
large volume of mail she has received.
DDI reported that he lias been unable to turn up any information

which would lead Seymour Hersh to allege that we have a map-making
facility in Vermont.
30 January 1973
Tbuermer reported'that the Vi;rginia Gazette seems to be

persisting in its efforts to embarrass Ca~ Peary and has been in touch
with Victor Marchetti and Patrick McGarvey, who have tended to confirm
allegations that the Phoenix program was supported by contract assassins.
7 February 1973
Maury noted that Mr. Helms is appearing before the Senate

Foreign . Relations Committee this morning on. police tre.ining, KlfIH
ITI', and the Watergate incident. He also noted that he has
solicited ~hesupport of Senators Humphrey, McGee, and Scott to
make appropriate public statements following Mr. Helms' appearance.
Mary advised that in response to Chairman Holifield's

investigation of Agency training pf policemen, he will meet with
Herbert Roback, Coum,el of the House Government Operations .
Committee,to explain our briefing of various police departments.
8 February·1973
The Director noted his scheduled meeting tomorrow with
Defense Secretary Richardson and asked Executive Committee members
to give h:Lm.a note on any item they, wish him to raise with t~e
Secretary. Candidates are •• " Secretary Richardsons' earlier
cO!1cernsWith respect to HEW providing the Agency with travel plans
of officers going to Communist Bloc countries. On the latter item
the DDlexplained that since Secretary Ri(hardson's inquiry to Mr •
.~ Helms (see minutes of 23 Jan 73), a survey had been undertaken and
reviewe.d·with HEW; which had no problems with these old arrangements
but is shifting the point of pickup to its public affairs staff
where such information is available to anyone.
00306
• -: r .
, .. -......
8 Fe bruary1913
~ , .,
Ma'Ury noted the statement by Senator Fu11iight following Mr.
Helms' appearance yesterday before the Senate Foregin Relations
Committee' in which the Sentator expressed his opposition to·the whole
concept of the Agency getting involved with the. police even in an
innocuous way.. Maury added that he will see Chairman Holifield's
staff assistant Herbert Roback today. Maury said that a stement had
been transmitted to the White House yesterday for John Ehrlichman's
possible use (attached). The Director asked that a contingency
document be prepared along the'lines that we will continue to comply
with the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 which
approves of our assistance to various police forces when ~
authorized by the Justice Department. In response to the DDI's
suggestions, .' the DDS will review what assistance to police forces
had been g~ven prior to 1968 and advise.
Manry concurred in the Director's judgment that 'it is ~i:Dpossible

to keep all congressional elements happy and that we face a period
of increaa,edcriticism from this quarter which must be met with
firm assurances that what we are b~ing criticized for is fully
authorized and justified. Unless the facts justify such a statement,
we 'wouldbe well advised to terminate the ~tivity in question,•
. Mauryreealled that we are obligated to sit down With

Chairman,Nedzi and review what we do and don't do in the 'U.S. (see
Monning Minutes of _lM 18' and 19 January). The Director
concurred. TheDDI suggested that we undertake anin-hou'se review
of what it. is <we are doing within the U.S. and identify and
e liminatethe marginal.
9 February 1913
Maury. said he spent an hour yesterday with Congressman Holifield

- arid they decided to have their respective staffs work on a letter for
Holifie~d to send to the Director suggesting restrictive, but not
prohibitive, guidlines regarding such activities,in.the futtire.
Maury noted Chairman Nedzi's current- concerns about this topic and
said the proposed mMMM letter may satisfy hisw0l'ries..
14 February 1973
Thuermer noted advice from Hicholas Horrock"of Newsweek that

a '.'sof'tstory" is floating around Newsweek on thEfgenera1 topic of
-po;Litica1 espionage and ex-CIA agents. Mr. Horrock asked' what
_constraints we have on former employees •. A lengthy discussion
followed, notirig in particular that the only legal constraint
" imposed is the terminal secrecy agreement as reinforced by the ~
cou~s in the Marchetti case. Other than this, there are no constraint
except moral ones. Th'trmer will advise Horrickthat thousands. of
employees have gone through CIA, and it is a matter .cif considerable
pride that only a handlflul have deported themselves improperly.
00307
..
.
-:',
....J
I ,
15. February 1973

. •• • • Maury added that he went over (With Nedzi) Seymour
Hersh's charges with respect to t~e Agency and our position on each.
DDI recalled our obligation to Artef Chairman Nedzi on Agency
activities in·the US.
20 February 1973
Maury related that Herb EM Roback of SenatorHolifield's staff

is being asked by David Burnham of the New York Times for the names
of those city police departments we have briefed in the past. The
DDS called attantion to our obligation to clear With these police
departments any mention of their having been briefed. In response
to the Director's suggestion that the Agency issue a press release
onthis.topic, a lengthy discussion i'0llowedand the Director
asked the DDS to report to him on what our understa:ndiIigWith.
various police departments h3. s been prior to our· agreement to
brief same. He also asked that editorial comment on any past
Agency briefing of the press or press releases be assembled and
explained that in principle we should from time to time im.ke it known
that weare part of the U.S.Government.
23 February 1973
..
..,
, ~urynoted that Herb Roback Qf 'Senator :alifield' s staff and
Chairman Nedzi have concurred in·a letter for~the Director's
signature. which Will indicate that we Will undertake training of
U.S. police"only for the most compelling·reasons."ifbrief
..discussion followed and the Director observed that it is· important
for us to decidt:: what we do and then advise the Hill accordingly. .
21 February ~973
The Director noted a call from· Senator Jackson, who asked him
to meet ·with Senator McClellan sometime next week With r~gard to
Congressman Holifield's inquiry concerning Agency training of U.S.
police . departments. .
1 March 1973
Maury related that former Director Richar:d Hems has been

asked by SeIia:tor Fulbright to reappear before the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee. Maury said that Mr. Hems would probabJ.! be
·queried on the Watergate incident, Agencytrainirig of police, and
. ITT and went on to describe Mr~ Hems' anticipated.reponse.,
. '
00308
,,
1 March 1973
Maury reported that Congressman Holifield's staff is anxiously
awaiting a letter from the Director in response to the Congressman's
written inquiry on police training. The Director noted plans to
foward it.
2 March 1973
Maury highlighted yesterday's LIG meeting at the White House
and his recommendation that we not provide examples of Congressional
leaks of classified information for White House use in reacting to
Congressional criticism of the Administra.tion's t1indiscretions.t1
The DDS advised that the Office of Security is keeping a reasonably
complete record of obvious leaks of intelligence information in
. the press and elsewhere.
5 March 1973
. Maury highlighted the statement Congressman Holifield will
introducelnto the Congressional Record today on Agency briefing
of .U.S. pl>lice forces. He also noted a related news release that
will be issued by the Congressman's office.
6 March 1973
Maury highlighted Congressman Koch's reaction to our~sponse to
Congressman Holifield's letter concerning poli~ training, as reported
in today's press. Maufl"Y noted that Congressman Koch plans to ask
CAO for a ruling on this matter, and the Director suggested that
Colby prov1desome guidance. to Comptroller General Elmer Staats.
The Director noted ~iee that Hugh Sidey of Time magazine

plans to write a story alleging that Howard Hunt 'Was employed by a
cover organization, ~., Robert R. Mullen Company, when he left
the Agency. Colby noted .that this company is a completely private
concern but has prOVided cover for one or two officers ovesseas •
., The Director asked Thuermerto be prepared to cov with any
inquiries when the story appears. .
"
00309
•
9 March 1973
DDI called attention to Joseph Alsop's article in todayt s
Washington Post, "Analyzing the CIAl s Analysts," which erroneously
refers to Sam Adams as a former employee. Later in tile meeting,
Houston explained why the allegation that the Agency has tried to
muzzle Adams is false. He went on to brief onJ I
communications with Justice and the fact that 7Ie Juuge rUIeu
Adams I material was not exculpatory. In response to the Directorls
question, the DDI reported that Mr. Adams has not been placed on
probation. The Director found' this unsatisfactory.
Houston explained the legal fuplications of the subpoena

served on Th~nner for documents related to the Ellsberg case and
advised that the Director may have to claim executive priVilege.
15 March 1973
Houston said that the judge squashed the subpoena served on
Tbuermer (see Morning Minutes of 7 March).
00310
/"
Included in this folder are miscellaneous items, including the

following:
Chuck Briggs' submission, including support of the Committee on narcotics

Review of Minutes of Morning Meetings
Agency funding of heroin study.
Tom Parrott's involvement with David Young
Cary's memo on briefing of Special Subcommittee on Intelligence

Of House Armed Services Committee (this relates to the McCord
letters to the Agency)
Broe 's report of his and Colby's meeting with Nedzi
0031.1.
-r""'tt-"'OI"lltN'f"'ict;A~SS~1fHlitt!D~-El
w
,u-,tI'ilY
u~
AI
.
. SU8JECT: IOpti_11
; e of Disguise ~~terials and Alias Documentation Within the U.S.

fROM: EXTENSION NO.
Director of Training r \
I I{
n. room number. and DATE
bUildj~~) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment 10 ,how from whom
INITIALS 10 whom. Draw 0 line aeron column after each comment.)
RfqlVED FORWARDED
';I;~
1.
Inspector General / (
I )
~r1 ~ C\'Stv~
''''
\~ J\"J ~ J~"
~\.f •
' .. -", .
.
I
-, '''':-''. .- .
4.
5.
6.
7. .
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
t--
1f
,
0031.2
~~M 610 u~J~ "'R51 .~ 'ONFID'~TIAL

..._. _ ....._.!--.... _"'.....,..·.__ -........... . . .
~ <40.--.h:~ •. ~ ~.....-.._~. __...... ._.......- - ,
.
18 JUN 1973
MEM)RANDUM FOR: Inspector General

SUBJECf Use of Disguise Materials and Alias Doaunentation
Within the U.s.
REFERENCE Memo dtd 30 May 73 to UI'R fin I ~ubj :
Issuance of Disguise Materials for Probable Use
Within U. S. or It I S Territories
1. The Associate Deputy Director for Operations has asked

that we give you a detailed report of the actual use that the Office
of Training has made within the u.s. of all disguise materials and
alias doctnnentation we have obtained for our staff members and students.
2. Disguise ~~terials
, .
OTR has obtained from ars disguise materials - including
glasses, \'1igs, mustaches, and special shoes to increase height - for
, 12 staff instructors at the Domestic Training Station. ,The purpose of
these materials is to increase the difficulty that students in the Basic
Operations Course and Advanced Operations Course will have in recognizing
instructors during problems and exercises conductedi: ~ear
urs. Exercises include surveillance, cotmtersurveial1ce, orusn passes,
and dead drop problems in which instructors monitor student activity.
These exercises are run tmder carefully controlled conditions only in
areas where adequate liaison exists with local authorities to avoid any
flap should difficulty arise during an exercise.
00313
" .
.
The sole use of disguise materials by these instructors

has been or will be in support of the training exercise noted above.
At no time have the materials been used for other purposes.
3. Alias Documents
U.S. alias doCtDllentsconsisting primarily of business and
social cards, but also including drivers' licenses and social securi
cards, have been used for more than a year by students
3. ,
art of the
e conc US3.on 0 e course, tea 3.as
curnen s are co ecte rom the students and returned to ars. Again,
these dOCl.DTlent.s are used only under carefully controlled conditions in an
environment I ~here adequate liaison with local authorities exists
to contain any flap; and the documentsuare used only for the purposes stated.
4. A thorough canvass of all elements of OTR discloses no other
instance in recent years in which we have used disguise materials or alias
doctunentation within the U.S. or obtained such materials for that purpose.
I.....D=1r=e::-.c=t=0=r-co=f"'"'""T=ra=m=m'-.--=g:---
cc: ADDO
-2-
00314
•
, .
-" ..
" ~ .....
. '.
. .
~ORANDUM FOR:
:
---+---------------~_._-----~-~----I-------~.~----_.
00315
(DATE)
fORM KO. 101 REPLACES FORM 10' 101
1 AUG 54 WH I CH MAY BE USED.
J '
, .o..-
•
UNCLASSIFIED
.'
f
D 'N
US
'~Al
JNlY o CONFI' 4TIAL o SECRET
r"IUfCT: (Opiional)
FROM: EXnNSlON NO.
I Deputv Chief WH Division

\ DATE
20 June 1973
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and DATE
b.. ildinlil) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment fo show from whom
J
RECEIVED I fORWARDED
INITI.6,lS to whom, Drow a line across column after each comment.)
l. (IJwrl.b i:- V JUN 1973' !J//('/

....
IJnno ~l J ~N 1973
2.
Dna .J\1Y V\
3.
10
4. Executive Secretary, /
I~~/
;/7-
. ~
u
.~:/
i f.
i,/' .
<,
-------- __ __ .. . ..
CIA Management Commi tee b/~V

5.
1)'DC --(- r1M .i.·v I

.' I
"
.-
doL
7.
Return to O/IG ~ ~".1-I
O?\ !
tI
I'
c::.i fh. / Cj
~eUJ'E:L..~
8.
9.
10.
Il.
12.
13.
14.
f-
.~.
00316
o CONFIDENTIAL O INTERNAL
·..
Executive Registry T
'7"~-'1t:;')/
20 June 1973
SUBJECT: John Dean Allegations to Newsweek Magazine
1. Mr. William Jorden, the Latin American referent

on Dr. Kissinger I s Staff, called today in reference to State
cable No. 11 2189, dated 11 June (attached). He said that he
had specific reference to paragraph 2 of that cable and would
like to have "everything and anything we know" on that subject
in the Agency.
2. The undersigned indicated to Mr. Jorden that he

had checked out the allegation that some low level White House
officials had considered assassinating Torrijos when the story
first appeared in Newsweek ang, despite checking outside WH
Division also, could find ~o 'one in the Agency who could
recollect or find anything relating to such a plan on the part
of any portion of U. S. officialdom. I told him that I felt sure
that nothing of this nature had come to WH Division's attention
because f~r the period in question I had been Deputy Chief of
WH Division and had heard nothing about any such plan. Mr.
Jorden asked if the Agency knew anything about Howard Hunt
having had a team in Mexico "before the mission was aborted"
and I indicated that as far as I knew, the Agency had no infor-
mation on Hunt being in Mexico on such a mission. I also
indicated, however, they couldhave been and the Agency might
well not know it simply because he could have used an alias and
he is an American citizen, which is outside the Agency's
province and really the FBI's business. I suggested that it
might be best if he checked the FBI on that particular angle.
Subsequently I checked with Mr. William V. Broe, the IG,
and Mr. John Horton, recently returned I
~I===========---
00317
I •
• I r'
and both indicated that they had not run across any information
concerning this latter allegation of Hunt and a team in Mexico
on a mission related to Panama.
3. It was apparent that Mr. Jorden was under some

pr~ssure to refute these allegations and was casting about in
aU" directions to make as certain of his ground as he possibly
could before he tried to do so;
Deputy C ie
Hemisphere Division
Attachment:
As Stated Above
00318
. _--. . _-
.... . j.:.
- ---- .. -..:
" '.
'.; ;';'"
, ; ' -.
'
.. ': : :'
...:0
.
:
~..:
~ .
. '
" ..
fTc 02776
.; ...... ....... "'"
,." TOR:111326i! JUN 73

. ,.
.. : ...
'.R .'
. ...
:
'. .... ~.:
RUEAII8 "
~\ UUUUU
RUESVA .RULPALJ, ...., .. : ,
to C S1 ATEi:i!H"':
. .~
.. ' ....
. .
.. :-.... '.
~
RUEHC ~2189. 16213'22' .:--~" . ; . _,,~

;
'.':.' '.
Ii UUUUU ~i:H • . ..~ .,

,
t11312i:.·JUN 73 . . ' ...:.;~ ....
S::CST t.'T,E HASHDC
RUE SV AI !t:-rEHBASS YPANAHA IIi Hi:"'"1>IA TE 2592 .
.....
;:-0 P"!-PALJ/P ~\NCANAL.UU1EDtATE .
LP AI... iUSSOUiHCOH UU1ED.tATE: ".
.
CL AS S TATE, 112189, .' 4-· ~ ~ ....
.:. ." .- . i
00 11652 I NI A"~ . .:~':>";:~~;' ." . •. ; .'.'; I,., '
GS :' Pi=" OR, PN '~:\' . , .; ::.' ';" .. '' ; ,
BJECT: ALlEG~ r I ONSHAD!; BY 'JOHN DEAN ·TO NEWSWEEK fiAGAlINE "'"
. . .....
..
~. " "
:':'~ ...;
THE rOLLOWIN"G IS ,eXCERPTED
rROM.A FRONT PAGE ARTICLE"'" :- '"':'00.. •
, -;--........ : i!
.. ,.:
O~2 TODAY'SNEW YORK :THiESWij!CH R;:PORTS ON ALLEGATIONS

DE BY JOHN DEAN TO 'NEWSWEEK MAGAaINE. f1 . ' ..
"SOME ItLOW .. LEVEL'" WHITE "HOUSE OFFICiALS CONSIDERED AS-' li' .
SSINATING PANAMA'S RULER OHAR TO'RRIJOS, BECAUSE THEy
S?ECTED THE INVOLVEMENT OF HIGH PANAMANIAN AUTHORITIES JN~i
11,
ROIN TRAFF1C AND8ECAUSE THEY rELTTHE GOVE~NHENT HAD' §J
~N UNCOOPERATiVE A60UT RENEdoTIATING THE PAN~HA CANAL . 1~'
~~TY.E. HOWARD HUNT ~R., A LEADER or THE WA~ERGATE" .~~
i~ . _ /
~
~~~~~~:. ~~~S~E~~A~AI~.~E.XI~~S~8EroRETHE MISSION HAS ': ,-.!:-t~·
. \§"
;"Dn"U~'EHT" rD.'" r' ~ S7iJ ,rc, .f1e1;", tc~tl:l tr_
'" }I .' i'A"·s'· REFERR'ED'..J,I.~ J. ••• ••c'•••f •..... .:'J)
003~9
"-
'.
" : ... '", " ..":'.:' """ ~""--.:-'.~""::."'_.
'\ .,... _ f'

. /
, .' \. " ,
UII!<::LASSIF"IED.
Use previous editions
, .
fj\
. ~-'.;,
t .
;,. ~. '- . ,-
- . ' ..
,.,'.
MEMORANDUM FOR:
l
~
i
l-/7/71
(DATE)
FOR'" NO.·
101 REPLACES FORM 10-101
o
1 AUG 54 WHICH NAY BE USED. .1471
., .....
r'"
._.j
"
(t~''<'; mY{ XQRKXIUES
......... -... ' 'c.
.::.
29 'MAY 1971 '.
No evidence has turnea up
~Watergate
. Inve_~·f1rtafors·;·although
, .... "'""'5 ~ hints that s~lI~e of
them may have participated !
~ . , '/ have come. from the authorities
~ in Florida.
~ By MICHAEL C. JENSEN First reports about a break-
'One unso!\'ed ,Puu:le thatl The nc.xl break.in was saidl in at the .Chilean ~mba~sy .be-
Wate~gat~ In\'r.~t1ga~ors ~rc! to ha\'e taken place six da\'s, g~n .to clrcu)alc In ~lIaml a
!tttdym~ IS the Identity of m·; l:w'l' at the E'" 38th 5t - t' \\eek or so after the Wa~er~ate
truders who ...!>rokl' into the; a ;r1ment in \i~~~h~ttan o/~~.ihreak-in of Junc' I? 19:2. and
off.ices ~nd res!dcnces. of, \,fer Urrutia.. resident of the: there \~'as sprcula.tlon tnat the
Chilean diplomats In Wash~ng-i Chilran De\'elgpment Corpora.: t~\·o ml~ht ha\'e neen re-Iated.
.. "Jon and New ¥c,rk at least lOuLlJon and a c1o;;eQ,Conomic d_ll~!llmk ncver . has. been
1972. .'
Four br'cak-ills a~ain!>tChile.
' Salvadol' Allende Gossens. '
. . .
I
,times from April, 1971 to May, "iser to Chilc,~"president tr.l proved. and. sOlT~e tnvesuga~ors
douht that It,.ex!sts.
One .explanatlon. offered for
all~ took place in the 14 months Pistol Stolen the Chilean break~m was t~~t
immediatelv precedin~ the Mr. Urrutia told the police if al;y Cuhan·r\mcncans p.artlcl-
brt"ak-in at the Democrat~' lhat a .2.5-caliber Bernardelli pilt!'d, as was the c~se mthe
Watergate headquarters last piSIOI had been stolen. How- \'Vat'~rgate,. they ml~ht havel
June. Thev also occurred at a ever, a fur coat in a closet been looklOg ~or. aocume!lls
time when lhe Chilean Govern· was reported'ly untouched. Gov. that would ~n~lcate col~uslOn I
ment was negotiating with the ~rnmcnt papers were said t.o b.ctween the Chl.l.eanand castrol
International Telephone and have been disturbed. and chew- gCl\'crnments.
Telegraph Corporation oyer: ing gum was ectged into the· Shortly after the spec~
I
compensation for Chile's take-' apartment's lock, a· familiar tlon began in ~liamj. Chilean i
o\;er of the hug.e .conglomerate's flractice of .profes.sional ,intrud.' oificia!s acknow!edgcd the
telephone subSIdiary. ers that gIves tnem tmle to break-Ill and reported it ·to the!
i
, Decau5e or fal' more sensa· (>5c~lre if they are surprised city police. who started an in.l
llonal disclosur~s, Watergate ,in· dUl'lng the cou.rse of an entry. vestigation that has been in-I
\'estigators have not actively The third reported break:i!l conclusive.
purslled the Chilean case .in took place on Feb. 10, 1972. Earlier this month. a Cuban;
recent weeks, beyond asking a invrstigators said, at the New namt"d Felipe de Diego was'
lue;;tion or two about thel York H",irlr.'nce- on East 46th int,:,rrogated· by Stale Attorney
Jreak·ins (Jr.lrin~ interrO;~ationSI Slreet of Victor Rio,'ieco, for- Richard E. Gerste:n in Florida
.. -' . or theWater1l::lte bur;!lars. m~l'ly a ChilC',\O official at the regarding participation. in the
" ,HowevE"r. S~nate investigat- United Nations. A radio and al brea:-·in at the offices of D:.'
'.' l
01'5 have informed b(.tll the tC'ievision set were reportedlYI D<1niel El!sberg's psychiatrist
Senate W;Ul'r;lCite ·c0mmit.tC'ej taken and pape-r~ disturbed. in Los Angeles.· , . '
and the Watcr~ille prosecutors I Tile fourth and most pub. He and his attorn"v indirat-
In'Washin~ton about the details! Iicizcd bre:ak-in took place o\'cr'ed that, if' grantet! Immunity.
of .the fotu' break-ins At the lhe we'ckend of :Vlay 13, 1972, :\lr. de Diego mi;!ht shed ne:;v'
offices and residences of the at tiH~ Chilean Embassy in Iig:lt on other surf('ptitious op-
Chileans. Wa:;hin~ton. Files of the Am- Ecratiens in Washington. lnves-
:I Occurred In New York' bassador and his first secre· tigators in l\liami l<lter indicat-
t:l.l'Y. Fernando Bachelet, werel ed that these opera.ioll:; minht
, Fl!Tth.ermore, a mem?er o.f t~e r~portedly rifled and two· ra· i,nclude .!he Chilean break-in
specta-l tntel1lgc~ce un.t of .tne dlos taken. . or break-lOS. . .
New Y~ll:k Pohce Department Chilean officials have been: ',- ..
was saId to ha\':. con.c1l1de~ ordered by their Government:
that the, three break·ms tnat oc-' not to discuss the malter, buti
curr~d m :\1an!lattan w.ere n?! s~t1rces close to the case said!
routme burglanes. And, mvestl- that the former Chilean Am-l
'
~ators in \Vash,in!:ton s!'-id that, 1.'ilssador, Orlando l.eteHer, had I
t~le .four bre-ak-l1ls had 10ll0Wed ~0t:tfil'mcd that the Washington I
slnlllar patterns. ,
l IIltniders apparently were seek-I
They were apparently dOlie ing sensitive Government noeu-,
~~' profE'ssional;:. \\i1h a' f('wl m e n t s . . .
Items taken to make t:l~ .bre~k-I Spt<culaticlll by II1\:esti"ators
inll ~ppear to be burglaries, mol ., .,. ".
il \,estlgators said. OilH.'r ,'aillablel . CapItol HilI Investlhators
items were left behind, how. have speclll.lted that the in·
e\'er, and scnsiti\'!~ papers were! ~rud('r~ might ha\:e been se-ek-
i
disturbed. possibly in t1le ln~ ~\'l(lcnce. of links b~tween.
course. of ~eing photographed. CUI,)~ clOd ChJlc...or lookmg for
~.. .
break-ins a;; fe,ilows: I
lnvl'stlgatQrs . "i'cC'onstruct the! pn!lt!cally sensltJ\·c documents
i'l!laung to the take-o\·er. by
Then" first known b,'eak-in OC' Chile of I.T.T. properties.
. eurred' on the afternoon of
!
. pdl 5. 19i1 at th,~ ~lanhattan
I '!$idence on Lcxin~ton Ave-
nue or Humberto Diaz·Casa-
., nueva. Chile's Ambassador to
(
'. th~ United N:ttion~. The Am·
bas:>ador reportedly told the
police that the intruders hi\dl
stolen such icms as a hair-drVi'r
and a nair of hOOI!; and ili",'1I"_l 00322
5
NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO.
COl'\FIDENTIAL
fORM NO. Use previous' editions (40)
.' . 2-61 237 * u.s. GOVFR"filC£NT '."NT"tG.O'fl(;~I;.i."
(j-- .) '-
I' "
.'\
25
:-:;,~t~:"f:":':
Mj.:MOR,{,\NDUM FOR'f;.Ij~'R.ECORD
,,; '.- - :~. '- ..
........ ;..
SUBJECT: Disposal- ofCla'ssified Ti-ash for
>'-.. ccriin cil.:(i~l~Cj ,,;-
"1. A memorandtitnfor the record by the Executive Officer,'

of the Office of Lqgistic:spoints outthat this Agency is disposing
of'c1assifiedtras ·'i.. ·:NSC. -jI'lj~material~ontains docl.ll"n:~.:
fromHleWhite H ....~ation;Rq~rn, " codeword and other';;'
. doc·umerit s from tg.,genceconunu;nity.This practice b~
in Decem.ber 1971.~·. tillin effect. Pick-up of 30 bags ()(t
is made each Thur,
.2. Unde~ .~~ es and circumstances such a routi~>

matte'r wouJ,4not'b ~.:butgiventhe recent furor caused~
'r-< . i; the:de:structi~x7:"o;ii !lts by the'ACl~ng FBI Diredor Patrie:
GraY-it-is felt tlfa, ter shou'ld:atleast be highlighted fo/
further considerat"-
,......
,~
/- '"
. ;' "
../-~'
, .;..
/
DOCUMENT
.-( .'URCE
O/IG
DOC. NO.
DOC. DATE 30. Ma
OF ATTAC."M.E:leTS .2
NUMB.EIt ()
(TS 185228{72/2 & ~ \ l
. '. <. .• ! . . . .' ... .. ....
./..TTE.'VT/ON: Tilb 10",,' lIri I II" pIeced on top of and attached to each Top Secret do ment rece£l'''4 by the.Centrett InulL!v.,nce AgaTtC'J:
or cla$si,"ed Top Secret lolritJl.inth".CIAand will remain attache~ to tke .document until .rtlc/tthnea. it f~.~Gl'en9"'2~~d. d"Sk~(!;. or
trans""l:tt:d outsid". ~l...fll-A.· Ac::"utGl~Secrc:tmat.t . . . tll1llt~d .to To~cro!t Control pffltfftnela'ld·tli·oill't1tdfritua:b-wh.cietl,1fcl4t
. dfittrfll'7el~t" to thi m1!re'r.Top Secr;il'!''ff(introI 041c41'$tDhO receillf and/or rllleClSethe attached Top'S"cr4!;t mat4lj4!lEitL.rijm. thb form ..
.ant! indicat,,· p"rfodof,cusiodll·.f,,:·th.':""ft~1tCl1i4columns pro11fded. Each lndiuidual .who se". the .TOIl·S~C"dc{pc;~ &aut .rig~~1i4:
Indicate tA" dat" oj AilnitUng'~" tA. ·n~itt~h41ad"Olum1t$.. ._ . .. . .
TO
0',. S I GHi\T.URE
I
.Mr. Colby.'
r i
IV'-'--
ff
f'
J}
'1-'·-
, ,
.J "
~iO May 1973
MEMQ;r<~NJ:)UM.FOR: Mr. William E •
. SUBJECT
.MijcHAOS an1L- _
"".'"",{, IcaU"tp....your attentipn t1 ~ atta~4ed sensitive annexes to (;>ur
1972 repo:rLof survey ofrEUit'Division~.You.hav.e:cseen them before,
but a fresh. look .:\.t them ~i ht be in order in1:he liht' of current
developments.
e recent revelations about the activities
.o.,t e ..... te hgence va uatic)fl Committee a.r.~getting c1o~e.to.our
~':;HAO$ program. W.e are particularlycdticerried about~1;HAOS ,
l>ec:a1ise.()f.th~highdegree of resentnient\v,eY~o'l.lndamon~II1any !
!4
Ag~ncy'eiripioy'ees at their being expe.ctedtc>pCl.rticipate ill it. I

f·
I
I
i
I
I
r
I
j ~ttachII1ents<'>€6~<Ttrctr,J FO!-oe-RJ
':;'l'S,t'S$Z;28/7'Z/2, 9 Nov 72 .
./ TS 1852l.S/72/3,9 Nov 72
'. I
i
,.
'.
Tsl'" .
Copy{of4
.00326'
. ",$.\,.~.lt'!s"l,,"'::-"~··"'~''--''.-'-'''''~.'_'': ".4ii,¥.
. - " ....
"t'::": :~"""~~,:",:,~._.~~"~ ...... _._-:,,~ __ ,,,,,.,..._.~~.
'~\,:: 'k'" ..
. . I~' .'
..,':. J.t> .,-.j~~~~~Liti:iY01j~hi..i~;';~·;: ,;

,
J
..~
-.
' .. ; .... ,.- ... ,'

'..'j
610L~or:~CM·~ . ~ C?,:<'~'"···~'-"
.. ~",:_ \.._ _, , :, _.,a,,;_.. __ ./I _ _ _ ,,_ 10.. .
~"
- 6 JUN 1973 '
MEMORANDIDI FOR: Deputy. Director for Man~gementand Services
FROM ... Ditector, of Security

SUBJECT :DD/M&SRequirements:'i~ 1Vatetgat~,Incident
. - ..,.:,",,;~~
1. Thfs memorandum is for informa'tion only.

2. In July 1971, the New Yo'rk Times, featured an,
article under the by-line on?illiam Beecher which
contained an exposition of 'the then current status of,'
th,e Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT). It ,was;
evident from this', delineation of these talks that ',",,' .
William Beecher had obtained the informationfromh1ghly ,
classified U.S. Government documents or from a person or"
pers~ns' ha~i~g had access t~: such d~cuments. "'
3.' In thfs regard, Mr. Egi1 E. Krogh, ·Jr of the,
White' H~use,telephonica1ly contacted the Director,of
Se'curity.of ;this Agency and requested that this 'Agency
provide a polygraph examiner to ~onduct polygraph tests'
on'four Department of State employees. In conjunction
with·Mr. G. Marvin Genti1e~.Deputy, Assistant Secretary
for Security, Department of State, this Office 'arranged
fora polygraph examiner to conduct these examinations
but with no CIA involvement to be acknowledged. ' In
other words, this Office loaned the polygraph examiner
to. the Department of Stat'e and the polygraph examinations
we:re c()nducte.d for Mr. G. Marvin Gentile.
4. Thfs, Office in 1970, requested approval to have
disguise kits. issued to approximately fourteen people.
The' di~guiseki ts. were never issued for operational
" . •
IL.---_
00328
·,
. . '.' ~'-',
",
"
. l...
SEgi1
,
-,'
, purposes' ,'but ',they were issued for practice surveillance

t " train local field office ersonnel, in their use',
L..,,-,.,..-~..--------....-.----..-----------:;,.------=----'
0 f the,s e' our teen
isgul.Se its, four were returned to the Office'of
.',,"'10,_ ,.,,~,-\ ,._.~ ,,-

Technical Services •
, , 5., in regard "to' other 'a.ctivi ties that,this Office
has conducted' domestically, the f~ll~w~g tw~' pr~j ects: '
al."e, sUbmitt,ed: '
A. ' Pr'oJe'ct' WESTPOINTER: In September 1969,
February197U, ~lay 1970" and October 1971, a' ,
, profect,., similar to Proj ect 'SRPOI~'11'ER, was
conducte'd by the Office of Security" East Asia
Division,' and' the Office of Technical,Service~ in
the' SaIi Francisco, California, area. The target:'
. wa's mail to, the United States froD. Mainland China.
'. ,
,~ 6.' I ian Office of Se'curi ty

employee,' who will retl.xe effec ive .29 June 1973, had a
chance meeting with Mr. James W. McCord, Jr.OIi 24 M~y
1913 :near the Senate Office Building~ A~cording to, Mr.
"
1 I 1the :ubstance ~f the, chance meeti~g was an excha~ge
otpJOea antrl.es. ' " ,
I ,
t..
~
00329
...
;: .. .\
.. .-
{
)'.0-
t· O'
. - ., .
~ .
., 7
.e-
•
. Pa~el SD3 and other student activist groups '.
O:I produced in December 1967 at Walt Rostowi~ request a

30-page tj~escript study of the SDS and its roreign ties.
I~ the SUI!J~er o:f 1968 ceI produced.--again at RostOi{f s request--

a pape~ on RestleG~ Youth. ~~e first, and most sensitive section,
waa a ?nilos0phical treat~ent or studen~ unrest, its ~otivaticn,
~~··:~··:t ·i~i5torj"... anu.·,;·,tac·tics.' :#It' dr:"=~'i l'le$.',:,ri.l:r J~l o;.'e--rt li~era ture ahd
FBI reporting on SDS and affiliated groups. Tne second section
comprised 19 chapters on foreign student dissidence.
Pages 11 & 12 Black radicalism

. OCI began follmnng Caribbean black radicalism in earnest in
1968. Tvo papers were produced on the subjectjone in August 1969
and the other in Ju~e 1970.
ocr
was asked in June 1970 to ,frite a memo ~.f1th special
attent~on to linlcs between black radicalism intbe Caribbean and
advocates of black power in the US. 'l'he memo \res produced in
typescript and given to the DCI.
O~I in 1968 wrote pe~iOdic t~!pe3cript meoopon Stokely

Carmichaelfstravels abro~d during a p~ricd when he had dropped
from public view •
•...
..
~
\ \
,-~,_''''
' I 00330
-•. ' 1
:._\. ..
'...• \~ .
.-I- .
i! .' ,.1
Prohi"oitionagainst cor·ITNT vs. US citi:::ens
.:. In September 19721 Icoomo to conduct hearability

tests of certain HI-' lop::":J.6=---o.::!"TJ..-=s-=t;=-=a-=n=-=c=-=e=--=c-=o=:::::!ercial telephone circuits
bet'\·Teen the US a:ld South A:t2rica _ Tne circuits carried drug-
related traffic •
I' ~ere success~u_. £ce ac lVl~Y
..,},Y1as temJ..p..a;eg; en Jan 73 followi~gOGC determinaticn that t~ey
....rer~ illegal. .
\{e conduct an intercept operation in I Itarge~ed

on radio telephone ~onversatiO:lsl--------~================dL--~----------
citi..zrans.
: Testing in the US of O?..J-developed electronic collection

.. s:rstems occasionally result in the collection of domestic tele?hone
conversations _ Hhen the tests are cOr:1plete,the inter:::epted .
material is destroyed. .
CIA I ltechniCians condu~ted t~sts\in the l·uamiarea in

August l~nI of DF gear intended :for use against a Soviet ~gent in
South Vietnam. ~'1hile ';-lQolly inno~lJous) the tests prec:::..ed the
holding of .the conventions tl:lere and. could be construed as
being somehow related to them.
In Februa~J 1972 CIA asked an ofi'icial of AT&T :for copies of

.,telephone calL slips relating· to US-Chir:a calls. The· o:;>eratic::.
lasted for three or four months and then dried up. eGe stated its
belief that the collection of these slips did notviolatetbe
COJ:I:1Unications Act since eavesdropping -was'not involved.
Page 29 l>1ail coverage
Since 1953, CL~ has operated a mail intercept progra~ of

. ·.1ncoming. and outgoing Russian:mail and,at various ti:les, other
selected mail at .Ker..nedy Airp'Jrt in Net·rYork City. T'nis progr:.--t::J
is now dormant pending decision on whether to continue or to
abolish it.
00331
.... .' . ~. ",
..'
.' .•-'
"" .
" ': "'·f... ,;-'- ...:.. ~ . :~: ••..~.
' ..,':., .....
. i· ft:l-- " '.~'~~~~., .' • ....
",'.
". '":-'. :.,

.. . ,
." . . "
, .. ': .
.. :'-:,'..
. .... ':;:
..,. ';.'
~ .-;:;". ~~.
had a close working .r~l?-tio:tshipwith. the. FBI over ...

Ii"""'-"'"' . ' ':" .' , , ' . • .:.... ... ".. •
.1 TSD flas :.>

....: the' past-few years: The_~Bt is .the only-organizatio.n that has . ~~ ..... :.~
.:', ":'" be~n fully:.l;>riefeGb'Qnl!S!?; a.u4i6:~!e£~~ues"and equipiiient•. :T:h-~!.l"~>~:':'" ,i:.
·followo:ing ct1"e si:tuations ·wheret(,SPJeqllip-rn.~tand.·guida:l~.w~re ':',,::',/.,
:" ': .
.. , ':- .' ~~~~.=1.n.'='~v~o=l~v~e~d~.i:~:....=o~p~e:·r~a=tl:· o:P::·.:::;~:--'->..·_.....:...:~. . ':" ·~ :"'-·~' ' : '·':' '2·:·: :t,· .~."• . .l.'. : .>:.:. .~- -"-~e:.-;: . . '::";'.~;. ...::...'
·:i.'' :,;,.,>:...,,:" .: ..:..'~--,---''---~"l"""
-.
. .,- :~<?:>~:'" .:.
. ....
~ t
, .
;
..
. . .:.'
". '; .,::.

-. . ': .' '. ~
"- i
;:: ...;..... :
.. ..' -,' .
•f "
1
I
i
I ." .'.
:t' : .. ~. ~:. ~.-
.~. i.;'
......... :: ..
...•... .
. . ..'
".
",
. . .
.
:.;:-
:~. - .
.'
..
,., " .... :.~ .

.. .
":"
0033Z
.• "........-i.
...~.~.' ~~;l:'·..: .~: ~. \

...","\ '. ...• .
.. ". ~.' .•
~..
".r' ";-" .., ;
' "...
f'
., . ..... .
., , .- : ' ........: . :
./- ~ ",.:'. ''::~' ; . ......
'.
'~"
iI '
i,
; ~. ",
" '.:'"
! '., .
. i' . .'{q) , T$D' has furnished:equipment iteYl'l,s '\Vh.;ch.constitute:
- .. -,~. ~ .: ·an.·,on-the,:"s·helf capabiii~}··to.engagein p.hoto and: ··X.. . .'
j", . , ..audio .s:urveill~c~.operatioIl:swhichmig~t.notbe ,:~. ":, " ..:.'
I <.: ..,;'>- known.: to the ·4g e ncy.··':In 'one case it is ~ow~ that a.'.;""::'
.. '. , relativel}" un.sopb.ist!""ated device "\vas used against. '.' ~.:."
.. a dom~.s~~..~rgeC . '. . :':~. .: ;':::':<' . ;~.:-"/V<);J

...... . .:,.....
.... ' ........ ' ", .-....' '. j
-:~
. .' . ; .....:' ..." ~ .
,',
.... : '. .." .. -. ... ".: . . ~
. '".", .~ , . : ..
." ....
. ,
.
"
-:~ .
~... , -,.f..',
..
;. '",
". ",~'.. . ...
.2 -
~. "
.:.,
,'' .
00-333 .'
.,"
\
.'.. '0' ~.~ 'j" •••
•
' •• , ......
... ' ...... ,
.-"~.J:
i
.j
I
. ,:,
i
..•.
..~ ..-
\
\,
... ~-:-."":-.
:- ;. ..... -:i- ..
~;:~~~ ~ . ..
r ... ".t'
to
"0
~:;~tl~
......"'" l
.' ...
~ .!
,.,
00335' I
.-..---:--- ........ . :- ... _. __ ._- -----;-".,....1 ::' ..

L_-
"
'.
\
~ .:: ......." .'. '
'- ..... '. -: '--:. - ...~'~~:';·~.I .~
.. _._---'--
. :.:.. .~. ~~ .
J.,
,.1 ..•
..:)
.... :. , . ~i ..
... : ,;.-\ ) .:. ;. ::: ...\ : .:.'.~ i ~;:~ .7:i. "_.' S •
...." .' ...

.'
i -r,::; i!:·')~~:L .;!) ~ic.!lf·::

l~~-~.. ·:;:·;::.
:.. i~r",;· l)'~;":i:-
.~".:
E:;;~;=s 11 .?; J.2 ~
:.:1 ~~r~~st. in
in ~'i l:gUS t 1969,"
CCI:ras esked··i:3.J~n~ 1970 to ~.rrit: a memo ~.;it)l speciet1·

att:nt~6n to lin.id(~\''b~.t1-leenblack radicalism in' the Carihbean
advocat~s o:~ bla~lc(':p\j~~rin tr-: US. 'l'he l:!'2!:!O ~.;asproduced
type5c~ipt and give~;to the DCI.
, .... - . . ~ (1 ~~_. ... '•..•.'._..~.._::.:.•.•.:::; ..- . . .

c .. .
3Crl.1'-;; ;·:e:J..)s G11. ~:~~~.. k·~ l~"".
i .. '"'.'..!.. :!...!l -:i" - -:: ;:~~10':l:l
,::;·::::.:"1:i~-1.:":lt S -c~a';.j.~:,l·s; ··:i;prcsd.· Ct1)J:'in~; .a p=ricd. ·..i{j:-;n 1;: li:l:l droppeq
:~r.~.:!1· p'Jblic vie~,,"·'.}. y.
~;~~'l:~
..
:'~; ....,
".1
.... ~
~
.......
I
!f
. I
:,.....-.
..."
.~~~
..
-
,/
,
\
'-- -.. - ,"
",:
"--.-;.:.
~ '. ,
'-"\ -
"';;'-'-.-
~. :~.,
L
:: .•."" .. .
",
, " ,.,'. >,'
" .
' .
..J
...
-... '.....
." ~ .:\
..":
......
i;"..•
L.;,. ~ t~i: ~:'$ ... ~:. .. '"::.~';:~"::.~::;;::~IJJ. •. :'~:!'>'\~ -Go .~"t;j~":.1it~~
I..,.::':I=;.-:::j:---.:.~,-,:!----::~:-:-.:,.,.~
':-•• _.:-:-:•.:""'~•...,..
... r~""·~""'·:-l----::.-.!T'l-.:""'
••"'J-J"<.:.-='' ' '!!l 7J _
f·~)lJ.t::~.;i:::.:: C):'t:: d,,~1.;,~ r.;;i:'~~:~i:ic.tl 7.r!:.:l t, t::r:y
.,' ... /."

',';':' ;"·-·-du,.,t :;:.~ .;·,., ... 'O···c~:>:J't" c::;;;;::ati.:;2! 'inl
: _~ _ _• • ",_,.,~._.. \'# ... ,J..... _..,. It'-'i-,"''''''''''d.
0-""-
f..;;,.
--:' ..
eil :radl.o ~-ele:9!!cr..e c'.:mvel:'sa J:;.1.Q:lS o~; I
"-n,... "") ':-.o-~;~·-·~--·'-r----:~-.;.-,...~--·-=--c-· .-=-·J-·.'_-;t-.c:.-=--_f-_,.,-
•• ----:
••- - - - - - - -
I-).,...-..,..'!.-:-·.-;:;-·~-:--·::.-:.-.-:1:-·...b-~-=-.-o-·~f.---'-. 1-!l-::..-··-e~l~::-.-.; .-·...·-~.'o.t-'-.~-0-:'l-_--;'--::-.!'33.
... I "t·iG::'s ~ .... _ .... - ---'.'- I _ _ ~... ' ... .,,)
o:::"'t~!l 1:1"lJl-:ii~:.~
.... <:~.
rJ3 ci ti ~!'~.:ls.
~e~~in~ i~ th~ US of (?~-a~v=109~d electro~ic collectia~

:..::.-~~tr:~~.:; cccasi~~l~y !~2sul~ ill
tr;.:e '~'~llec"tion IJ: ~'J~~s~ic tel~'Phon=
c;:;r:ersa ti.ons..... ~il1eb· the tests are cO!,;plete) the iI!-tercepted
I:::3.terial:is destroyed~'
'.:
...
CIA1 ·]t:=C""·n.iCil:l~S t.he :·;iG.l'Ji ~i'ea in
cO:1I11Jcted t~sts.in
",
August -171 OI'. »,,:,' g-=3.r. inte~ded for use against a Soviet· 2.gent· in
SOl.it?! '\;-iet~:a:!1~~' ..-::rr~i·.l-s·· \1~cll~t i{1,..t!''jC~':.'Jl)S, tee tes~~ pr.~c~.::~-=c.: .t~~
:~':'l:li:lg 0::- .::he c;:,~:.,t~:.itil)ns· t~-=.re a'!!d. c r.,:ul:.:1 b . C~):L:;tl-;;-e1 e.~ . =
t;;ing sozehmi reia~ed :to the::!.
' .....
L
'wI_
In ·7eo::u3.r'.r-:1972 CI.:;' as}:-ed. an official of ;,;7&T for- co?ies of
':'""1~"""10-.:l<"
-1;. ..:._ call . 401_1-0 t'"' -u~-
_ sli':"'s"'r=1"lT';"- .::>- C'},i-~a
.:.... _:...... ""'ll~
\..:c:. _I:'. m'..,,,, o....v "'r..;·..:.;
._~. .... _
_""'~ u -..J .1.~~_ ~~
·......
-.:.
'.~
:-."\
1'?~ ';ed ·for thrae or l~our !!l0::lths, and the!! dried up ~ caC. stc. ted its
belief that. the'coliection of these sliiJS did n'Jt vio.late the· ,... .
~.
C::i:::Junica'tio.ns Act.s:i.nc-e·e?v,=sdropping ~-ss not in-,olYed.··

i
.'
'. . . . " t' ~
.,.:.... '.'
: ...~.: "t
•• ~1..J.J.
~
___.~"' ~j~
• ..:.. ..{.";:) :;)_
S;i.n<:e 195,3) CI:\ has ogerated a n:ai1 intercept p:::-ogra"!: ·of>

inc':':::inJ; a~d o'.ltgoing RussiEl.n; ca.il a.nd, at vario".Js t.i:::es) other
t:~l~~c~e\.l :.:'!a.il a:t l(;r_",ed.:r .l\i:Cy·:"l-.t· in I;=t-t Yorl: City. 'Itlis !,!"ogrc.t.:l ·,
is !L~';; d,j::.-::;:.c.t I:~~ding d.-=cisio("~ on ':i1:c+"'~~er t,o c(:::1,:'ini·.i-= or to
a.c·)li::;h it.
I
i-
F
l •
tj
l
."
,..
j
.-'
b'. -;- ,~- I
,
·i
I.
00337
:-
..... .... .
\ 1.- !
iI
,
'.
~. - ..._.---;r-.--.'
".
'. ,.
......
.- .
1'~
_w }~~'.t)._ rti'.. ·L.. f:;,__l_.~ =:. ~.~::\
~-~: _' ,__ l...t:_..,).~
__._ .. I:--!'
_'_,f/,:::'S :-I1C;
.__1\."1"1
' (j.':~'.
~
.
,
~
r
. "
,.........
·,"1'5£1 llas 1·~;';.<1 a close ".:.10!·~Z:11g r~l2-ti()~is.h.ip \vi,:t:h.· tI1e :E'}3I.6\rer
~l'I'll~ D'~a·t:1··j('
~.... ~ ~
..- ·.. ,·\V,F· ...~;-.
J '0
__ ,··~.
- -
'_r".;,. __"_,., ".·;':·';-'-1
_._.
i.::.. . ~!, ..~ (')'11 ,,,; o·i"'j-;n'l·,~J
_1.1::; • _, o<C ' _
.... f·~r.n
",c.:. • .;._. tt:..··~&. T".,~ ....
.".c..L .• ,:.::>
.b.::enfully
'.
briefed
."~' . "
on TSD ai.~di0 -:_;~,
'~~.-,.'-.
tec1miaues ;:~nd eauipJ:lent. The
4""',.,,....... ·· · '-
following a're situ.a~io!ls wh;:-~'e TSD equipment anaguid2::lce were ----
hivalved jnoperations: -.
."
. ,:
.,
:'.,.
.... :."
,~
00338'
..... ,-
. /'; . ... ..:. . . . .- : 0
-~.---'
. ~ '. ~
...
.i.
. ..::;:- f
t
.,'
. "-,,. -' ...
.. ~ ",
.. -: '
.. "
L ~--------------------------I~f,:'
(G) TSD has f1.ll"nished. equipment items which cO:lstitute .

!
. an on-the-::;hel£ ca'pability to engage in photo and

au~io surv~illance operations which n1ight not be
kno".vn to the Agency., In one case it is kno'\vn that a
relatively unsophisticated device \V2,S used against
..
~-
a domestic target. ~~
. "-',
-
"
, ··~Io
. :-..;
- 2 -
,.
r •
;
!
I
....
,:~
"
"
00339 ·t
i
_._---.
• 1 .. .• '
.~\"',
..
L
,
"
I
.!
I·
-.--- _. .;.
-
-
..~
it \·:as ~as€d~· :·on tt:e
section "l.'ouldcover.those.i;l1i1,1ge; not includ.ed in
xer0X copies
SDB
'\.
o· \ 0\
S
fOR",. _··\S~O
U _..•.
,
1'
~CE110 ...'t. ._tiE...
RE \.... ..
'l/rll ~_ ..... _
- I
, .
........
'
~ ! . , ' ..
.....
;_ ';';,-u
J... J :'.:' .L- '. r.
.- I ..... .
~ - '." •.1
.~ ,~- '..
!
!
I.'
..
,:."
SUBJSCT: ~, .
\·;,;,,~~·:·.:. ~. .: .... te l'~~·::'c~::'\~·i.ls - ~~·~;::"~;ct t~·r j;:·r..:i:~~;,~t
:'i'"l ': •.~ ~ "." {:.;" "::.. ~-~ t
. ' "~
1. This m';l:lon,ndum respo:Hls to the Dircchn"s rcqti'::'st foi·

a ,r,<---;:?-l· t •
t")_F ~.:1.y 1
!n··'o.v'-::'=i'".":(::r:. t In
. '.
Cl.Tl}~ :: ·::-.:. ...:(·1,,¥ ..
:7.:r)ce '1'"
.l<·~l.\.':"!"Y 1 (', 9
.J..iQ
\i.:ith ;\r:::SS1~S. l'~unt, !.f cCo1"d.. J..;i.:~(~y, '~{'i)tl!:lg,' c~r ::~rl)sl'1.
2. I have h2d none \vith Hunt. Liddy or Young.
,. 3. . My McCord contact W,tS indirect and occur:r-ed sor.1t:tirnc

dUl'ing the lute 1960's when I W,,5 Director. Oifice of Cc..mputl'l"
S(;n~ic(;s. I opposed pl;~11.s !()l" l\:..:hnical D,i ",''i~-:ion. Office cf
Security (under' Mr.' !·.kCord) to c.cquire z:. sepzn:;:,te cor:::putcr [(;1"
its In-Place, Morlitoring Syste:::1.1 [of DD/S&T (th....n ORD)
\VClS th~ computer individual worKmg wun ID ;,nd. I. think. would
h:;·,,;c ,~.et~iI~ .. ·
4. The !Crobh contact also was indirc~ct ~md invulved his

n:-quest. first through OMB. that CIA fund il.irci~n tr<::.vd on bc:h:tlf'
I:::or
of the Cabinet Committee on Intel'national Narcotics Control. Indi-
vidual phone discussions, are noted in the attached. The Agency
,
were I
n 3., ,from Messrs. Krogh. I

I"nd I II imderst<nd
has ,forv,.'ardcd n:le.... <lnt oucumt:nt\:l.tioil. Copies of '
land Colbyarc:att~ched .
• also. "
5. I held a staff meeting ye-st'.::rday to ?"':;-:S the ):'equc-st to

<Ill OPPB e-r::ployees. One (,ffic;;j- who was attencling a func...·:'ll will
not be aVe'tilable until tomorrow •
•~J\::-'
_ ._ 't- p\\ C't.;'~j.:rg5'E'.\!·."J.:j:"~:JO
0...... ,,~ • • • _ \, (,""'1:1,,;:-:1.
" .... oJ.. _I"J)
"J
1 - :'\1 :,d F)·G? C,L"}\ =..TJG lsI Charles A. Brim;s

.; - ·1"l1.· E· COT.oJ..
i G~;~ f ]' -~qs~~~at~ Charles A. Briggs
I Dlap·n::;:Hoc: Director of
Pl<'\nning J
Programr.r;ing. ~nd '1j.udgeting
Attachment
." A'sstated 00344'
. '- .. ! : ,
',' .' .
', .. "
.
;,,:.,.
,
: .. :-
'.
,1 1~"7:~) 7.2;. ..(~~ll· f :-:·;',1 ':·~.~·1 'l""',-.y·}c.t", (~~~\~:3 :~4":: l'!:l.~.:i:! r·:~·';,~::-;11 ..~:.::·~·,"1 !'.-!~ .:I. ';~'.~JrJl
~·,':·~l~t~.1.~ ">~1::~~ . :tc~~1 :.;[ 1"!1e L"'":t.;:"<>::tic (~:':":\.;.1. ..:~1 \;~~~C, r:'~"~1: ·;;;:;·t:·~£.:n
: 1r:~·v(·1 in. c":>:t":!1~·>-;ct:(""~n ';"'itl1 ~;'l"::·ii"· ::i.2r(;~.~i('s" :;:tt~:1·,':5fs. Sir:l '-\":.",'5
;'1!-r.":>r"iing us ttJ tl')(:i14 iJ-z~~"::l,,:~>it~l"l t<) :::::.:It 1.~5. fc,i4 ' !'ul~_ds f~i14 t:1:e
1:.: ;'":. \' c.l.
... ""'-
7 F·::b 72 J7c.,ilGvi-ri.li .f!"C~H1 'l"'r\)"!c'L-: . r'l::.n 3- 5 UOli)S fCl· 3 in(!i~·. i<.~~t,·~l::,-
a11 il~ FY 72. C';;st prob:'\bly SWK. !,~G1nick J:'eady to m:,l~e
first t:.-ip. _ I I
is '!)~u!:,,:' cd in. E:·:Dir s'.dd OK :::-e T(.::hr~,l1.
.&. c..;..t,;.t , .
i
! vidt.
7 Feb 72 See attache-d' r;jf":r{i') [rem Egil /(robh, Jr. to Bill C;:..lby .~nd
fo1l0W-':I:l ir...:mos !'r()m'I~
I
,~
(2 Aug 72). -
___'1(21. Jul 72) and Colby
J.2(7) ;.:~.-:.y 72 John Hurley. O:\~B c,,1!r~d, I:1"l1thJ.-:i'lg possible I':l-Cgh/

Minni.ck attendance .1t a L:;::i:l Al~••.;:dc:tn (Static..rl Chi,:~f?)
, '.c,::co.J1ferc:ncc on narcc)tics. !-Ie also said .J eif She~herd,
.: ",hite House, W2.S };-.ying 0n a~~f with I Jor
. hirn~e1f, Shcph~l·~ und Mark Alger, O~>fB to' Eu::-cpe.
23 Jun 72 Icommcnt(:d on Kl"ogh/~,1il1~itk,inicrcst

L....,-----;'7....---"".-----
in gBttL'1.g CA acth..itks, including l~:ige-scale PM,
on :~arc.otics f~ont. I -:-_...,--_--------J
6 Jul . 72 '1 ~all~d. Notes say only: nI·.1innic1t:~Eurley film.

.We ·,;·ill send. II
2 Aug. 72 I Icalled re Colby letter (attached)." Said travel

orders ready; .need money this P1'.-i (No record in ruy
notes as to \yho w.~s travp.1inr; ,"vhen, but have f'iint
rec..;l1~cticJ:::l of its beiub to MC":ico City). I
and Ben Evans contacted ------~ byl I.
1 Nov 72 Related? nIl. Acyainnotes· nl~e cr5--ptic:
Survey £,NDD probleffis/
e......,r----.--,-------..--------------'
e':-:lCO.
" '.
00345
. \.
".
, .'
,. : .~ .• J
.'. ~ . ',,,'
.' ~.
F:;·:Dil-· (>'~by) s"jd DCI h,td ;~.~;provC:d $30K [01" Sl:21~it:.Ye

(_:8 l)~·c.j:.~ct - '::0 r~/:~.ails.
20 Jan .72 R(:millded ExDh" l"e $32K r.e said DCI OK'd ..
"- -.;.:.:.-
,'.
..
00346
\.
ON E\T_L.RNA'.t'TON-,\I, N.A_H.COTJCS CO=··~'.t·H. qL
. .'
~·:~'''')''''''":'nb~T
~""""'l l.~_. \oo!" 7 , 1-' 0"11
,/ , "}.-;
~ •• ) {.,1"1·~ Pl,,~:,··~'·1~:·r;r
_l_C........ _ t:..:,~ •• t •. t .1t -• o · c.:::ritr2.1ize 11is
- - ;;'l...~tack {)n tile , ill-
..~ tCTnC1tio~lal
. uru!" -L-;dfic •.' ~
'J'heCornlnittee ~1~
~\.J_;:'
.:;"". ..' ..'CIt_]-.._ .... v"'"
' :" _ ::'c,:". <- ,p-,"'_ y.,..t.""
.•••
VI..:... <;-t..c '0' ,,(=1 ,;ret
u ..... .iJ. .....
. Salary a~dad~inistrativesupport for its srnall~ full-time st?.ff has been

. provided, by.the Executive <?Hice of the President;.. Other e::-.::penses are
'. '. being. charged to the constituent ageJ.1cies.ap.dcl~partments• ..
The Bureau of CU5tO:mS~ BNDD, and .AJI)/Office of~blic Said:yhave

proVl'd esupporC.
d' .. •. 0 a2.
" t e .. L
. .-. ' .
.-/
The CIA'should be prepared to defray. nof:Inore than fifteen thousand'

. dollars inoverse?s travel e>.:penscs fo~ ·CahinetGm.n...-ni'ttce staff during
.·1i;e-remainde.T of FY-1972" " .
. ·\Valier C •. 1v1ilUlick~ tpe Committee 1 s Staffqoordinator~ canbec.ontacted

,,~;, ., .:£or further details. '. .
...: :: ':. " . ",.", ", ". -:
·.··.Thank you for yo.ur assistance.
..
fJYq9r:
EgilKrogh~ Jr.
Executive Dlrcctor
Cabinet. Committee on
... '
International Narcotics Control
cc: John Ehilichman
.. Assistant to the President for :Oofue:'stic Affairs
Mark Alrrer
o
OMB: Chief, General Gtive,.nnr;""t Prog.rams DiviSion
-- .' I
em 1
~
cpresentative , CCINC
I· .
1Y(h':ldtlgGro\~p .
-'.
00347
.... .. - .. ,... .. .,.' ~ ." -.

\.
(
:;Tl~.:·:: :.1.-,-:: ~~.:-,~. r 1"~.-~-l3 1':·~,~~: Z: (;~:~~ -:::"'l- ~;.:; ~)l~-:'~ ~~ t !::. r
~1:; e -C .~:.~; : ~ =:: t: (; 0 ;-:.:..;~·:-::-i i: ~ i;~} c: 2:1 :.:.:~: t.: ~.. !~:. tr:-; ~-~2; 1
1".::,:. . . .• ""...-.'.....~ ~;.-' .T.•~ ...... T~~._

_ -_ ,J.*_ _ '..... _ -I.
...... c·...:~
1.J..
.#'--"l ·JIf~-·l~~/7',~!\
(-:- .. ..;..1 _ ~£-r:r:
,;.'.---A O"""' .., ,"~.{.·,l
"'""'-
21 :r't~ly 1972; s~me .~;l1)j. :,ct
. l~ '1llia is in res.ponse,-f'cr-~thc-.r.e"re;r-enc.e~m e.n'Al r~g3..rdi_~s

'\1Se of CL-\ fur~·:1s to cove-r travel e:~pen3e5 fort11-c \'{!1ite }-:ouse
Cabtnet Com:r-i:llttea Sta..fi fo-r .It!scal "l"'t;:";'i.. r :973.
".
.
.
.
-.
z. Youf\4e<:.ut:.~ori.zedloObligated up to $15 .. uno Cor the use

of fhe V.. hite:Hou.~e Cabin~t CommiHee Si:afffor u~ve:l expenses:
. ,~,..,.~,..p-
~_ .. ~.~
!.~¥-
... __ 1~73
.-". _ ...
O,~· ..,,,Hon· ~,1., •..,,,1rl1,,:>. ·.·p. .... o .... d:-..:i· ·,,,;n:
~;".t;>-..io r
• ... ~;,.- __ :.J._Q ;,...:;t
....... _
,_~
!-~.,.. Of'r·n· P
.....,._
_ _ ._ - ~ ~ _
'al!6.i:';1cnt ~ud 'trav~l orders issued n.£~inti. t: yot;r O\7n ~~pprop~late fan
our-nber.
3. To the e:::d:e~t i:b.. t yon are'\.U1a~leJ:oab::iorh this requirement

wlthinyollrpre5ent allotmebtiwewlU bavato arrange :tiomerepro-
g'r2.tr.rn:.ng l::tter in the yearf.oc6ve~ :his >..tnbudgeied it~m.
/~/ .
. ,
I
I
o /PPB ~,-:-::--- Ihg Z Aug 7Z
Distr:ibution:
i
i Orig & 1 addressee
I
j
I
.:,'
1 -ExDir 00348
1 ER
I 1 -PPB Subj(~¥S
,i
I
.} .. ·OfF ..
{
\, - .Readina ·
ij rDhron~ . . -'
.!
/'
"r- ,
\: .lH
"h'," ,. ~.~.. 1~_

.... ...... .:>t~(· ·,r ... .-..... •.-l·t)
.J;t.._~.4J..':', _./ "7' 3· '":, ...-, •.. __
}i"~"'-~~' ".'~ c.:..!..j
', '-;.,-,. \~\-l-C"')
..J ...... 'i \-J"""
..=.- ~ ·""0.,.....
i.a..
~;.}1::?: C; ,1b :t'i.'l.:: t C01TL:TIJ..'t tee ()!1 :C!J:t; :~; :C"ll.J. t ion,c~l
Na:ccocics 'c::ontr'ol (CCn'iC)
.;
- , '.
'. -1. At our :lllVi"bi'!tion) Fli:. H21ter C. r-linnick.:> Sta.f'i"'

. r;!ernber of' the CCINC.:> is' scheduled to attend and participate
in the Regioncl Narcotic~Seminar sponsored by HH Division
on -27-28 .July -1972 ~.. _,
2. In accordance 1'lith pl-'occdures adopted :for travel

..
-
of' \-fnite House Cabinet Commit~ee Staff in FY 1972~ it 1s
'f requested that funds to cover the costoi.' -Nr. l:iinnick's
trip be released •. Attacnedherei.,ith is. a copyofa :formal
request from 1·1r~ Egil Krogh dated 7 February 1972 toNI'. ".
1l:l11ia.'i1 Colb:r r2-questing travel funds _f'or the ba.la.nce O:l
PY1972. Nr~ Krogh is now preparing a :formal reque.st :for
$15,000.00 to cover tra.velexpens2s :for \fnite House Ca~inct_
COlihl1ittee staf':f i"or FY;;:..1973. ~ I will fOIy:lard this request-,_
to yoU!! ofT1ce as soon as it arrives • - '.
Attachment: --.-"/--
;;)
.,00349-
.. ........
.
, ;: .....<.:: .:'};:/(.!':\:5;.>:" ....,,... /./;': '.' ·;fti~';"·')' .,' ... -, .,', .' . .. ,
"., ': .;'.. . :' ~',:;, :" ,: . ',:'.::" ·:·~"'{.!!;'!~\;?:~~\~lf?j:;;\:.':;'!::~i:·{l: '," . ::,\':;r.::.:<:,:.."
.S · "uly'
_ '" __
'1.'971 "'. . ""...: . " .,,:'i :.·7;;.\,.;~<:"
~ ~;::::.»·<:;:·fl·~'·"·;::-:-'-·:>\·'··_:~·:-': ~- ';
,.'
.,_. :.;;:;._~~
.(
>,~J,lCl~'';ported
tJ>a:t J olmEhrUehman had advise telephori:~'~
us that the.White House is appoblting fOrmer CIA employee Howard .
Hunt as.~;se,curity consultant.' "':':":'<'ftS{'('~'"
. ;:'~';'An9th~r account of the' MormngMeeting oft~s';~ie;J:eads:
" - '!" • • . • . . , " ..•.. ' . :."~.'•. , \ • .
•• ," ' " ". i . .. .A .:.:.·~::/ ~·.:;!:_.;>::~~.:_i:::::<;":'

••
It· was'
also annoUnced that Howard HUnt' ha s b~enzlamedsecurity
consultant lothe White House. GeIieralCushrnantoldEhrlichtDan
that
. Mr~ "Hunt would have full cooperation
.
from .CIA.':/:,,',;·,
. ' . ,;..
16JwX .1971
.. 'Ca;ver'said thatI .. kas mostapp~eci~tiv~~fthetim~

which HOllston spent·W1.tn nun yest~rday.. .',' .' . '.
~2 July 1971, (the day Howard Hunt came to see Genera~Cu.~tuna:n)

. ·Carve;iug w.1ghted his session yesterday withN~(i~tafier ,
David Yo'ung" who is assisting John Ehrlichman in 1."~Viewing the'
. secret Pentagon papers. .':;:' . /;;\:;
_, ':. oJ :;:1 :\'.,' .", : ..: ;).J:~>.(':~ ~':<;;:;:,:~~I;-·:. '. ::': . ~.
;. '. ;" :':,-~.;:\...- :'~'-,,:::,~~ /<.~'; .';"
IS Au.gtl'st 1971 ·/.[:.,~{!.::';}X;f';:iN?':
'. ", ';' .:,;. ';-. .. ;.:. !. "'-."~ -. - '"
", • • ;0 . . . . .~
..
.li~,,~ber 1971 ~,'i~i.~~~~~J.;.:'

";".
... . '.
In ~~sponse to theDirecto~'s question Carvei;'~#d,tha.t some
work requested by John Ehrlichman is pending;' ,The Director asked
to be filled in later on the details.- ·'\i·,.i;~t}r>,
," <• • • '
," .-.;
18 January 1972
,I ..
.
,,!. • ~ .""' .•.
!
. ·.::.;';DD1'~l1ed attention to the article in todaY'sN~~YorkTimes,,'

"Nixon Acts 'to End Security Leaks.. II (~cel.!>tfromthe article:
IlLast July, two members of the 'WhiteHouse s~ff,David R. Young
.' of thaNational Security Council and Egll Krogh, ., of the Domestic.
. Councll.: were asked to investigate.earlier leaks prev:entrecur- :i
rences.") . ..
"
~ ,.'
". ,' .. :. 2 •
"".~: _..... .'_.
..::.'"
........ ".
.,
.' .";
. ,~: :" ".1. . ...'
l.~... ,
':,
.•••.•. : DDI i1otedth~article by Michael Getler in l:OI:Ia1iT"
'; ',Po~t, "'New Spy Satellites Planned for Clearer/'Instant Pictures. I I
Later in the meeting the Director asked the DDS to advise the
. DiJ;ector of Security to undertake an lnvestigationof this leak of
EOI-related information, and to convene the USIB Security ,
c:ortunittee., . " ,
' ...
11 February 1972
.. '. : ,':,The .Dire~tor reminded Executive Committee~embers . of

..::'" ,. Dr. Kissinger's request that any inquiries from elements of the
, 'White ,House 'staff be referred to his staff for conveyance to the
", : >. Agency.
,,' 16 February 1972

'. :' .. , .•
. Lehman noted plans to continue briefing Attorney General

. ;', >.
Mitchell, whose resignation is effective 1 March.
6 March 1972
.: .....
". ~"The Dire~tor noted his memorandum to the Deputi,es and,

Independent Office Hea. '5, subject: "Allegationso! Assas~inations~"
C
,':'" 'He asked that it be mentioned at Staff Meetings. . '
Zl March 1972
. ;.
. .., . ,
The Director said that the President has seen his 17 _

.... ;:. '.~·February memorandum on reducing disclosures of c1asf!ified
. .' intelligence and directed the White House staff ~o prepare a' >"
memorandum urging that all agencies comply with prope,r dis-
,closure procedures.
8 June 1972
" .
.:'; ..
. Houston, said that he will be attending a meeting called
... ',by DOD General Counsel Buzhardt. 'WilO is recomInending that
., >' Justice:.
."
'.
drop the case against. paniel',Ellsberg.
.' '. ~
- 3 ':" :, .'
":;. ~.::'
.... ...
::~
.
, '
, . 00352'
,••,,<.'
~
"~:\ P").' "~,..... .
:'.,: .', ~~-,j :,:. .':.1
f 10." .•
~""_.'-.~~-
. ,
'-". . ,. ......
..:- ..... '" ..... ,
~
'" ~ ". .'
- Ai 'co. _ _ ••• ~ . . . .,
. (
,.... '
The Director not~ the 11 June arrest o£ James \v........ _.,,_._-"

four others who were apprehended at the Democratic National Com-
mittee headquarters at the Watergate.• >With the Director of SelcUl~l~.·"
., present to provide ~iographic details, the Director made it perfectly
c~ear thatrespons6s to any· inquiry with respect to McCord or HOlwa.rd
;,.::Hunt,who may be implicated, are to be Umited t~ a. statement that
. they are former employees ';'vho renred in August and Aprit" 1970 re-
8pectlvely.T~eDirector asked that this guidance be dissem.inated,,·,
". via staff meetings. The Director aske.d that any inquiry ~rom other'
'. '.' elements of the government be. re!erredto the Director of Secllrity
.. ,.. \vho is to be the focal point. Inqub:i'es from the pres 8 are to be re- .
'. ferred to Mr. Unumb who may say that McCord worked. in the Office'
. of Security. The Director notedth.3.t we have no responsibUitywith
respect to an investigation except to be .responsive to the FBI'sre- .
quest for name traces. It was noted that Howard Hunt may have done·
some work since retirement in connection with the preparation of
"supporting material for some awards•.• The Executive Director was
~sked to review this topic and report to the Director" ::
. : . . ", ..
. ' :.~. In response to the Director"s request, the Director of Secm:ity.
htghlighted developments over the past twenty-four hours with respect
to the McCord/Hunt, et ~l.. situation. He noted that the late edition
. , of the New York Times carries a different story by Tad Szulc than
that which appeared in the edition..recei-ved here. The Director of .
Security anticipates B~me Jnquiries on Bernard 11.. Barker's situation,
and it was noted that Mr. Barker was hired by the Agency in 1960 and-.
terminated in 1966. The DirectQr complimented Unumb on his handling' ,
: of inquiries and asked that future inqUiries be met with'a; response " .
.confined to the £act that, now .thatwe have a.cknowledged that both·
.' McCord and Hunt are former Agency employees. we know nothing .
more about the case and the caller should be referred to the FBI as .
appropriate.
20 June 1972 .
Tho r·il-ector not~d receipt ot'apale~ o~' a sa!ehouse in Miami

which is being made available to.t!:J.eSecret Service in support of
.' . its work in connection 'With the Rep~bUcanand Democratic National
Conventions. He &skedthe ADDPand the DDS to make it absolutely
.. . '. ' .. 00353

!!!e~E' .SEHt3I"Vl! ...
•
.
~. ",.
,- .
¥".-~""",\, " •.
,. ,:.\.;./,:';;cleil~I ... '. . . . '" .....• IthiltP9r.cg8geratj.9h·~41~,.;::~j.~
..!-l1:lq~l"t~king.. .
. ",:::;:'ls' to ,be confined to provisioii·.olth.~··safeh~us~~'a:Il4th~tit is . not to
···.·be·usedasa:siteJor investigati0D:s, jnterrogati~D.:s~or"walk-ins",
etc.'Th'e Direc'to-r-added that we will not loan peopleto'the FBI or
· Secret Servic~i:n connection With their responsibilities at the'
· Conventions nor will we provideeq~ipment unique to the Agency.
. . . :.' . , ,-; .'. " ' . . .
21 .Tune 1972 . .".'-:':~ "--'." ..

-."-;.,
· '. In view of the coverage in today'sNew York Times arid

. Washington Post; Mauryrecommellded that Chairman Nedzi be
bri,efed on the McCord affair and that this briefing include all
our information about the others involved. The .Director asked.
Maury to t.ouch base with the Director of Security and prepare .
a~ing'pape.'l1<~n thistopic..Jor hisreyiew. Citing the 'number
· of distorted rumors about thi.s matter, the Executive Director
· said that durin'g the co~rse of the day he hopes to provide a .
suggested Headquarters Bulletin fo.r all employees for the
Director's review. . . .
. .' Unumbnofed a number of inquiries from the pres s with .
.· '1-espect to theCuban-Ameritansi.nvolved in the bugging attempt
at the Democratic National Corxti:p.ittee headquarters and their
•. .alleged involvement in the Bayo{Pigs, etc•.. The Director asked
... ' , ..
that such inquiries be met with an explanation that we are not .
. .' prepared to be helpful on this Irnt:tter.
. '" -' ".~. ';' "
'. ': ~
23 June 1972 '

. .. , .
' . Ma'ury noted that "~ 'briefe4 Chairman Nedzion the McCord!
Hunt situation. .
'-
:. . .' ~ . 21 August 1972
.,.,' . Houston noted a. telephone ,call from Howard Hunt who·
explained that his attorney was with qim and had.a question
about. a friend's past affiliation with the Agency. I
" . DD/Sec,t'has reviewed the employment, and Hous'to-n-·-r-e-p-o-r-t;-e-a.. .·. -
.' .: that he replied directly to Hunt's friend, Mr./
. thatfuis old affiliation should create no proble-in-'-s-l:--°n-c-o-n-n-e-c-t"""i-o-n---
with his' appearance before a grand jury. .
,18 October 1972
Man.ry noted his response to a r,equest from esc General
. Counsel Anthony Mondello, who was reacting to a request for the
, personnel files of those .former Agency officers involved in the
- ';'
. ~:' -'..~
~ .: . .
5 .. '
..
.,,)
,..,.
,."
..
..'.;, .
... ,
00354
, .'
.<._-?"~'-~:--
. .,.
~ ..:
.. _.• -. ~r:lr""j?J!l.;.,
.1'" , :.. '.<.. ';:
..• J I
r· , .
~ '. . " . , ,.
., .-"',.:.:.
i ;"Adminfstrative Practices and Procedures. He added that we
.are exempted· from relatedCSC regulations, and the Director
endorsed'hisplan to provide only the dates of their departur~
from the Agency inthe event the Senator's office calls us on
matter.···· . . '. .
,--":. '.
3 November 1972 .'
" . Houston recalled that last August he' reported on a call .

... ·from Howard. H.untandh.. i..S.·· :s~b.se~uen. .t ~ guidance t.. o l
'..' j pn h()~ to handl~. afflliatlon )V1th theAgen~
,.
The Di.rector highlighted his conversation with David Kraslow

of the Washington Star News and his flat denial ofa proposed . . :--,,::":';:;;'.;.;.'
.story that the Agency was asked to report on the Democrai:ic
. Party which led to theWa~ergate incident and others. The,
Director noted his pl~ns to issue a statement of denial if such
a. story were to appear alldsuggested that Thuermerconsider :.:::i/i';\/;i;::'s~:,:t(I.:
d~afting one for contingency. use. '
.15 November 1972
. DDP noted a rep~rt from Chief, WH Division that on 9

October a l\{r. Harper of the New York Times was working on a
.. story which tries to link the Agency with Cuban emigres, the
" ..,break-in at the Chilean Embassy, action against Daniel E-lls
and
the Watergate case. Thuermer observed that this is the
!
: :~
'.
~ he has heard about this topic, and the pDP concluded that such c;l.
story would have no basis in fact and it would be inadvisable to
try to straighten out Mr. Harper.
.. 22 November 1972
'Warner rel~ted that' according'to .A ~.sistant Attorney Genera.l·

Henry :·)eterson,U. S. Attorney Earl Silbert has several questions
on the Vratergate case. The Director indicated he will review this .;: ....,'...
matter lC!-ter'. . ;.
, '.
- 6-
........... _'~"'H"" •. ~", ~."' ~ ......" . .~"... 'M _ '"

1
Ii
, The'Director.noted the a~ticle by Thomas B. Ro~s in""';,
yesterday's EveningStar-:-News, "New Watergate Dimension'? ~I':.
and the impressionleft therein that.the Agency was involv~d .;.
'in the Watergate inci delit because a lassport bearing the na?:rie
:, .,':Edward Hamilton was found on Frank Sturgis. Any inquiries
0.. ,'"' from the press or elsewhere are to be met with a "this is
nonsense"rep1y. ' The Executive' Director noted work under
way to identify the, genesb of the passport story.
, 15 January 1973 .
~.' " . "'.,",.-' ". '~..:~: ,". .".
Maury note~,press stories that Watergate defendant

Martinez was on the Agency, payroll until 17 June and anticipated
some inquiry on this topic. The DDP endorsB his view that, "
whereas Martinez was intermittently used a~ source to, report '
on Cuban exile matters, this relationship should cause no serious
difficulty. ' ', '
" 18 January 1973,
Maury ~ repor~ed·thatWhen
he and Dave Blee, Chieflsi,::saw
Chairman Nedzlwithrespect to the Chairman's forthcoming trip
t,o Finland" Leningrad, Sofia, and Athens, Chairman Nedzi "
briefed on his November conversation with New York Ti.mes.
correspondent Seymour Hersh. Maury went on to highlight the
sev~ral topics 'and allegations Hersh claims he has with respect'
to Agency activities, ~particu1arly allegations that we are en.gaged
in extensive domestic operations. M~ury will circulate a~rilemo
.'randum ort the information Hersh claims he has. The'D~r~ctor
explained that we, should assemble a senior team to meet with
Chairman Nedi~a.ndclearlyoutline what we do and do not do in'
the United States. ," .
..
.,
19 January 1973
Maury reported ,that Chairman Nedziwould like'the full

, Subcommittee on Intelligence Operations to hear a presentation
by us OJ} Agency'activity in the Unite~ States sometime in mid-
February~,~' The Director noted that his decision of yesterday'
to turn out a seniorteam for this briEding stands •
. ~-
....,.-:.,. /: .
.-::< .", . '.~.:'" . ','
- 7- .. "; ',".,::;:-.-:.::
'"
, '.
. : ...•
. "'00356'
_ ' •.
-~--:;~,-': :~ ,- - ; ..
~r.~J~~~ "
," -~~.~ :.: .~.~ ;' ':.1~: ". .,-_.~ .... ,. ..,
. '.;
··23 January'1973;
.. E~c;i~~tiv~Director noted that the termInal secr~cy· agreem.ent·

... ·which Howard Hunt signed said that he Will be acknowledged as an
:Agency employee. His assertion that he is not bound by the agree,..
··.·~ciJ.t because we di.d iii"'fact acknowledge his em.ployment here is .
. therefore ill-advised.
7 February 1973
,. ... Ma\1ry noted that Mr. Helms is appearing before· the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee this 'morning on police training; .'
ITT;· and the Watergate incident•. He also noted that he has ...
solicited the support of Senators Humphrey, M~Gee,a~dScott
to mak~appropriatepublic statements following Mr• Helms
aRpearance.· c·;·· ... ,
~. .'
8 February 1973
..
MaU:ry recalled that we are obligated to sit down, with .
. Chairman Nedzi and review what we do and don't do in the U. S.·
Th: Director co~curred. T.he. DDI sugges:e~e Uhd:,rtake .. ..• ~
:.~n tn-house revlew·of what It IS we are domg jt\th~,U. S. and ...
... .-
id~ntifyand eliminate the marginal. /.::;'.'r ; .
14 .February 1973· ...

., .
.
. Thuermer noted advice from Nicholas
. Borrock
. of Newsweek:·
that ~. "soft. story" is floating around Newsweek on general ..
topic of political espionage and ex- CIA agents.
""
8-
•
#/,.,. -
. ~._--:--~ '
., .- .;' r
' .. :,
'. i Ma~ch '1973.
"Maury highlighted yesterday's LIG me~tingattheWhite

Hous'eandhisrecommendaHgn that,we ng~ provide examples of
Cong;;'ss·i.onalleaks of c1as'~i1:ied informition for White House
"tis'ein reacting to Congressional criticism of theA<iministration's
Itindiscretions.·" The DDS advised that the Office of Security is·
.. keeping a re'asona:b1y complete record of obvious leaks ,of intcllj....;
. gence information in the press and elsewhere. "
'.' '. ,
6lv1:a~;~h'197 3
. .
.
'.~ ,
(Signed) William ,
Willi.am V.Broe • ;-.
lnspect9r, General ..
. . .- ...., ...
"
. -'. "
- 9- .:.,
. . " '" -: ~ ".,

····00358·
......
,
,,'
"".
.. ', ,.
.". ".~' ...
-- - .. ," ..,_ ..-.' . ~;,., - ,- : - -:'-_ :~ ..
; ',,( .... :,:.:" .
.'" ,'>O:'-\'~ . . :':,~:.l~;~tN~.,~)f~;>~:/.'
'>";'~!f;~,~Pt,
. " ',,'.
\ WYB. DcHly Log of 30 May 1973
!'),i~~9,P:~I . '. .• ....•...... leaned WVB.:tobri

Kissinger has'"'asked for· some papers ~he,ld,
n'6wwants to see them again. One~ Restles"s§;,
a:Whqleset of countrychppters; and of the CS(sinceleft
,qI.A.l,;,;vV:rotea mo,resensitivepiece drawing'l<:ri~.$Cl.p. . other countries for
.. ".-:,." ~ :'::'1:,."", ::,:,' '. , " ' , ',' ," ,'<'!: . ,", ::', ::C'o--"~-"-/"'~~'\>"~:'::',::''·'!,:·r:',.\: <
' ..... examp~,~.s. ~omakeits roint.i)OC:;lbalked ... -:gi(1~ltwantt2do anything on the
':lJi",,>'US sid~:~""-.rhe whole~projectev~ually': wa~rried over~to CA. I
workepunderl Isupervi~ionl"Jil~g1eft--inB oston--.)-.----
• .,,- c':',',":.- .... ,>: __ .'
Thereafter ~KiX, in August 1970, be<:aJ~e we had done so much work

we· published a ~eparate paper "Student UrirestAbroad"---compilation of the
<:0u.ntry.
,,"-'.,...... .. ...
,-.".-'
s tu.dies .•
: ,., ::: ::.;,,':;,--,;:,,-,-:
• , ,", ,.' , .." .",C·
:i'~'~~!~h T~~rewasa 3rd- - .. on theCaril:>B:~!

,.. WV".f!iisfamiliai'withthe 3---but didn1t'}{"
a~,p¢c,ts ••
~l~r .. !kIsi,inger had told

it back with some nice words onit..... y.'~?~ike to seeagain" . (not a
IS,ent
direct quote)•.,WYB said he had' the DD!:,$';"~BR¥-~':Whitmansays Latimer
Lati~l'ii .... sent me a~ paper;
has copies ofbotb.reports .. His'recordf'~~~~~'i~~thatl '. paPcerwas
,carried to San Clemente perhaps by Gerl:;~' '.. 'YCushman, butgathered
;GJJ~lj.Irlanhad;beepunable to deliyeritt; , '1:. Could be thatKis~inger
;·f(;~:~:',i'I~;,:~t~~i~S~:tme~ IS . stru1~~~~gt:;it~t~i~~ . '~:t~ot confirm, thisiti
stufL •••.
Cni130May 73
e'
•. \
,
JJ.··i:~
-" :.~ --.- .. ~ ,":" , .. .... ..
~,..: ~~ '.' .'.;.- ." . .
.
• ......
-'~.~.
. r.' '. ,1' "-. _
,:. ::... ;.,;
'.•
:.,~.
~ :: l
j
!
, .- ..- - - - - - , . - - - - - - r-·'-;"L1·:S ,!~ ,.t.:".". ::'::'-C :'-,. ::.._""~,;,:._"",, ,::<,~: "~C~C:~.",~:.I.l

I ~tC!:·.·":> ,'>""" ~ ,:JeD I
1 '.',:~.;~.,:. ~-,.~;;: c 'S(; ere ~ ~_ r y. c I~\r- -~·~.-'·1 -
-----~---- ---~ -~-~ ----.. _._..-.-.... _ -'-" -------"'-00
--~ --
"•
.. . '. t C Oll.ln11.ce
>c'.. ~'.g0rl1en 'tt I £ ,,,.,
; I'"~
I / /)'.
\ .. ! . \
'.'
....__. _.-----_::::~ . ..;._._------_... ., ._..- ----..! - _._.._ '---
2. I
,......
3. ~~, --j----- '."oj.~
"
4. .-.........---_ ..-... -_.
5.·
6.
~-----;-.---_.-+-_._---;... .
7.
J------------.
8.
.....,....--....,.------1f-----+-:.-----;-....,.--..-
"''':''"
.: .... ~': ., '. .'1·

J-------- --...--.--"'.'.2.'--..~.~. .,..'-:...~__itf------t-----t----....,..,
9. ,.
.
.. ........
,"
:
~. ",
10. .: .
11.
.
12.
13.
. 15. ; '" , 00360

j"
~
./
"
•FORM 61 0
3-62 :..
USE ·PREVIOUS
EDITIONS
0 SECRET- 0 CONFIDENTfAL ·0 INTERNAL
USE ONLY O. UNCLASSIFIED
.....:... ~ ..
' •••••• .i• • • • • • . •
.. \ .
I .., ." .
I , "
" ... l:-
" ,
," I·'
' -
1
............
t.. . ~ 'I. :"... " .... ,'
r'
, Ali:i:
., ~""~"'7
f'
·······'St~~:;:~
........
I
, ...•;, ..
- 2 -
j'
".
~-.
00363
·1
",. ,"
"~
.ro. ~- .... - •• '
-,
\.
.~ .
. ..
.~
", . '. t
.:,
, ..
·I
i.
60366
.. J
\
-.
\"
.
'~~
..."." ,
Zo-
00367
II
.1
','
;'
r.
..
..
..-
i'
.. .
'.
·0:. .0·,,)';"10:
·U·~'I"·'
. r'
.
' ..,
.1
,.,
f
," "
J(
:.: ,
'"
.'
, .' ~
.'
.r ... ~
;
,
. ' .. ,
'''':-.:; ':; ·.l •
;",_ . . ~:.~ r:~"'~~,' ;:. ::'~l'."'('" :. .~'.i

..... ....:, •.• :,1
.'
..:.~ ..'~;i =. \"-':~~~~v':" .. ~. .

... <.;~':~\::'.•;:'.::': .
... ...
, .I. ••
• ,,'.'!" ~
..~
i .. 1
.. :. ... :':':i ;, .:~ ...._,.... .' J V"! . .• ~ •.'. "" l:'••

.......
" ,,' ..., _ :::,-:.::. .: ::',;;' :.~ :'" '.. " ',:" ::> I(
.-
-;
-.' . :~.
~:.~::. t::~ :l::;'.~ :'.. :\~::'
~-'
._~.
~~~.....::.:":.: ,~:";" ..:C: ';''';:'~ !...;; ~\ !o~~::':: i~~<':'_:-:~~~ c-::·:"I.!:·_~~ .."';':1t f";(
'; ":.. ~i~ tl~_-c-::le ~-'::"c::':~'r:~~. \1 ..] ~\.., :,:·':''';~:·l ~._.:::t"::: :;':'l.
~ .,,~:::,":.ll~~; t~ ~ ,;:r.:.r"'";"~ .,:::'."~ ~j
:>~:: .!..;: ~ "t¥_" :..:.' ~""t: : : t,::: ~",-·,t~-:'
.:'.: : ~ . .:f~~r.... :-.~:. ~:".::J':' ~. ~ ':..: ". : :>~. 'r.•
j~t~2Mi~~~
~7 ".;':~".h -::;.~ f'-;,·~,,: ',~.- .:-=-- ::':>:.1
.. . ' ':.:'~ ~;~~:.!~?...;'~;\,;',,~ ~~;;"~'1
:':~;!;';,1 01' Cr• .:.~. :""c ...."Z~ ••• ,.u.\ Y.'[~.'~ ,l~ :.l::~:'~ -;~~C i:t.: ~:~.~.!
. ::,~t'.S .\\~ KW. 1~·."Oln~ ..; i '.r"!'\:e.l
~~~-~·::~·d~~ o! ~m90 ;:.:,l:;' r:'l:'i:.l
r:.en, the ~\l..~ t.~ld. v;:'~ \ ':1(;_
d;.(..'\ltne:~t.s !ro~n .~ acth"itie: 0-, t,.\;,e &:'C:'1l~ ~'~i!t I
~ CIA e:1?l! (\!ii~:l'-~J.,v 1';1'1' . ht 'it'~S in Wt1~l."'l.~c:n L.ut\
\,1.lUed
. t~l~$. co:: r~.otogre?~ed the S:'~ ::=.~~ . ".. 7~:-· j;-;:;~"{';~;
~~;;~~;~:{:~4{i~:~~0\I ~1·}:;;;~Ft.t~~~il
0' ., ......
~.~~r. c:.~~f;.-r d~:t'r:.~ :"j1:::'"Ce"S
;:~~~\~~ \;~~~'~;::/:"~, '~::.:'.. : ':::.;:' \
~'eL"'t L~,),.:;'~~g y~;t. iill
...
M~1 ~:'.~ (:.. :l::.~.r .... Ii! ,,~. ""
~.:- ":- ~.
: ~~r:':'ed ~ t.he-iU':5 o!lh:!U't hi.s

U:.'e z:~~. or P:;;=: r:.!:rlr. r.:\...~:-d •.
>?:r."~~~c%' .,-:i. ~Uti:~ :h;~ft !~; lJ a ..~·~~~~ir.:o~.t~ !!!.
'v.'~---= gtC":ted. . t f!.'l~~ r;.','.:l:-t'e l..r, the ,:,•. ~.'f~~
' ..
.
,~~. ••t.." l:',;t""-..!.
"'~ ....... ~ ~.'
&.. ~;:~ou
t _. ,;.t ••~n r
f.7.~-E· ~~:.:.~.-.~.:: ~-;;.::':; ~..... ;;~ ~,:~:-"-~~~-=,,
t.':~1;.l!::l:'~"'~::!l. t-ke; ~","I."" ."-'" ~;,~t'~,.sc:j t:l l~s !;;';~']"' .j'~.
0% \I.\l \,!' .. ~;;;:.~' ::j;?·:e;::;:i:,::'..z.i :~G~~~: t:~~t ~:2 t.).d .'0\;~.n·
".l"''':'''' .~~ i-r----:;.tion· ~~,,~l.\ ~('",:-; . :::C i~':c !!:!n\ -tt tl.~ u:~··
... ; •• ...., .. ".... ..~~ ....;~;~ ..... \.1c:·
tnlf: on C.!" eon·_~I;.J;Vn i"L:.i~ ,1;.,,_ ~ i:l; o!~ t~~s c...I~t~~ 'C:"A. ".1- ~".........-.....;..... ~ '__'-io t£..~ l;.... _
ti'1~. nut ';)~ ued, ., I
~:",\~;:l. t!W Yo ....~.t·:~d .~....,~-~~;..;.v.:;.~"
.,
A~ ~JCl\ll1:k"" ~~r ~1 {~eral o!O:i&ls:., ,', J

'«'!~ in r.ome ....,. ~i
tt'tl\i1lc:s , In\.~st!t'2tloa !OUZ"':e2:' ,10-.,:.-
.le;::d:'- n:r':i~re~,,·e~.Srr~tel p:l':-h-dCe that FBI· l,S:~!1t•
. :'I-~: lent,. ·:Lur.tt ~J;e, ~:i~l f~\.t.:lo:i ~lie c.~--;· 1:1 the ~~:.:t"
£i-rld (D-~~t.1, se..:..~ r~i~j ~f :.~~.-":~tt· :.:,:":, ..~~::~ Tt\I\
r.ebi.!oes CO:l::-Jt.teeCbi.lr.:-.:1tli P.t:,\;e-d a.t M~:;'Ql !n~t!'nd::J:.ll
~.wmli.m Ful\)rl~t(D-hr'Ll.1 (\.i."Po:t. ." ' ... .' ,', '
~L Fnuk Cburtb . (D-I
'loDe!' : }.ssl....ant U.s. At\orneyi~ ,•.... .,
:i~aho). 'i'ha ,ou:-ee ~so uidl J. Silbert attUned to U1 .<,
th3t Sel Li:'C"foit:. form~: U,S.\
,
\1-'ht4he: !JL-t!nd <ti...")' "",oul4
,~bu:.lleo:, to the Ori:;sn\u~i~n be ir;t:-oC\l~d u evld,nceln'
d .:',::Jtori: ~n S:.4i'.e:1, .,;.'U 1:.:¥~ I th.e ·\:~a_~~;:te me, s·~ieh
~
'.i.lu.cr ""'
,,:::.: •.::; &In-t'I.l;;.."')~e.
.\.
C';,~::~ :..to~ ":!.Y, i
." \\"'hUe ~::,...:.;:.,. ~ u .::~\-e t:>; D;~,c. C. h II t':3! t~;ttf:;
De
-~nf~ ~O!1\e o! ~hc ee
;our "\ .altt:\~n whO'J:llI et=illOrcd \.
I~~t~=~~ t1",~Jgh oHi:i:ia in :-'1~:nl ~stestate office
cl~e ~ tbe in\'e.ti:atltlft. :1.1- ot D~:-.;&rd 1.. Barker. or:e
.k,~tl:c J c:~.cerr.::l: t.'l.e ,:u%" of lh! \'·"tr;lt.e cc~end:.n!.S.
.'Vdl!Lntl: o! . ~~.t:>:'S ndthe:' Dt: D:e:·j, wr:e ":AS P-:'!lted
I:~':'\c ~ ;l'n!im".~d not c-:-r.i~ imr:ltl.lllt)' by thl~;Z!1i jUt')'
'r'c: ~te'fn ~tfenlh,nU in the ~twe#t!,ctin, th~ c~~. ~a\db.
:W.t~:11t.c CU~ ,ca on tri2l Mon- t~~d the ~.nd jUry' ..., dthe
hr In t!'.~ U.5. Di,~rict CC\lt1 }-'In thlt r.o had COn'leta Wash- .
.~e~ , i:':;tOtl lul '!-:IIS v.ith Plto I.n~
.' It r.1,o b:: 'bet:'l lrat't'lf!d. th"t:
the fO',lf "",tertate, ddcn:&r.t.i
~. Fcde:"l lutr."riti=J h:\'e. from l.~e MiamI a.::u (E:d:er.1
tr",\:ed ~()'olo1\" ~nd quc:,tioncdi Ml.rtlnu. }'Til.nk SH~r~t: atla I 00372
t\l.'O meD 'It'flo I11d ~n In\'oh'cdi Ylr;'Jio Jt,Gonules). Hezai4i
. in Wa\hin;:tn:\ ~'ith the Water-\ that hebeHe\'edhe and his· .-.,-'
. ,ate :rCtul' , but \\ho b:ld not! friends were wlitin: to 'sce'
be-en (':::;,:ht al the U<"n\ocratic\, ;on\cone {rom the ~c\'t'rnment· .-
'heacqua.rtcrs ~ccncJune 17; ._.~'~i..;&:.~
~ .. . '
\. ') "~ .
:: .~.
.)>.._:..~:: /<.~;':. f
-. . •.__1
·:~··:::.\.::(1 C:;...;~.;.~:~1~1 ().t' :~ >~:'-.::.:;..::~ 1·)'t-~.~:

.~~i-'~:::~1.:-5.i:3 ~~:~~:J.:'~~:; t .~::'·::·.':I·;:;:.l t~?u
1• VllI Di 'if is i 011 11:1 S l~r::\! i 2v!e~i t !1e 1-'2:f 2_·C ~::;'!~';f~!1 !.::) 1 t.:.~"~11
(
"C{)py"
.. -'- •• ).
n·..,t..r\{:;11~(1 oy - 1 • •
·J~J.C_< .ill1:.~;==1'·.:30'il (1::1....1
r. i~i"ii:~~5
J:' - - ••
'Gf~~::
- ..
:tC CO~l·-
taii19 no Zl''=W infor'f:latio!l.. '£0 -;:;h~ best l:no"-i18dge of tIl03
I'-ivi"':t"(ln
_J_ ..... 1.:,) . I J··lt::>rp.;~
Ll _ _ _Z;:) no" .J....
'''Oll1,r1-::\''';r'''1
"",,:,--...~''''- ' __ \.'J, -}-o
t. -4-h<:>
l-.:..s.';'" ~l"~-r!1:""';"n
i:\ .J..~~,- .... .J..V.L ..:h
c..._ ~ t
E. 1-iov,;:\rd Jluht wns 'ei'lgngecl on 08:13.1:[ of ITT in brc2.king
into Chilena diplom~tic insta!l~tions i~ ?ashing~on and
r·~:~\V Yi..s:·j~.
2. Any conDe~~2on between ITT auG these Dr0~k~ins

~s pGrely conjectural ~nd th~ column tn~es care t6
P':>i~t this out.
u;:t ~ i..s.._ 1 ... _--l..

t",~.:.~\,l".. !......:... '! _.:.""..;....- -_v~--# ~-
on this or any ITT matter. He had nnticiputed

~,,: that Andersou, mi:~ht ,imply such a relationship in his
:lcolumn nnd had assured us that this .. was not true. '
.',
Theodore G. Sha~kley
Chief
Wester~ H2misphere Division
.'
i
' ........ ,
. , .... ','
j'.".
,. -
~ I ..... ,."".;'
.,
.t :"
~
"1
:.~ . '- ~
',' .• 1 ... .."
~
~,' ".
,
;'''':'
. , .':" ....
.,
'\
i
00374
rOLO H~R-
FROM: NAME, At)::;) o. OATS:
12MAR
1973
_._' U;-;CLASSIFI£VI I 5ECHET

llse pre~io::s editions
fO~~ -NO.
1-07 237
...... .
,
":' \ ~.r· ,... . (
:. . ', . (,' ,
,,
'"
.f .
'
.. ;
";
....... oj
..'.
~
l ... :
!
.
-:
.
.!
.:)
~,
. : -..... .? .j') r'~ ',:,"
;') I
: :;.~ .!.> ~.: .... :._/ "./ :y
- ...... - .- ...------....:-...._ ..
00375
:. ,
,'.
- \J ,. .;. . : :", ~ . ."-;

/1
I ,
"
" .
. ' ......
-nJi"'\ ( ""'.)
./ ,'j
~--r--l-l:'i-·-C-.~-~-':A-S=-S'iF H:D CO;"tFIDE~TIAL SECHET
{.;,
r:..4~" ::t}~
1-67 237
1'0"
", "
. " ... :.' : I . ·.....
. ~ .. , .. .
'
, . j' ~',::: ::, .
•• I .. • • •
{/ iJ
,
., .
.1
'. . .. . .
~ :'.:.~". ~ ~4":;~ ;:·r---~~ !:.j::C:'ti 'f'

:.7':.
~. I;:·i:.·.·; -:t~ {(. " r ,l:'::.::~.,:jJ !~ : l," -:: ~j;- t·~::-::":",T
" ';,'::;",; ,,~_j'iJ;i,)'.' '",': C .'j.' s I., j' , • 7/':;~L,J . '>';, '<;,'' 'J·y..rt~ ...
.....
·,,:;;';:~;,"'" _"',~:~/~E'.~" .Y."

- s:-)···(····J1:, }iq,..,\, u -qi"l·~-~C(·n
'0".'
. nC"jc 'J2
-:'1 ;~:;;::t;;· -' '1:'-:'0 ~'-s
~'-:;;~,~~- '
. t"1("!) T
-~ -- ·_·T~;~}BKi~·::=
'f{ T F F.-)
la. WIlN(SS 19. I.:J~~CSS 1:0. hC .... ~ 1'1"::"£

~f __~!~~ A _
H/A
2\
. "'i~iA .
~-"'C' "rl·'sl;;
'-;:?bn A~LS OF 1!{CIDENT ci'tIEfLY Cf:5C-~;~-I-;:;rr:cC~ill;:;E·~.-;-:';i:i:;-;;;";s~-uc~;"iSil:C.... illiG. IHMI

--_._- -._----
I
At -apnroxirr:atelv 1330 hours, 13 1 '1272,., FOT~;gn J:rif:~i'o"1s Dhrjr.icn- l';ond<:'4-Va)~

Cont.rol Cpn+'er p~s 2dyj ~pd by 'M. 'P. D, C, J 3 D" that a b;}:r-gl:tI'3r h~d-ta.!;:g~.;;c.e.::t ~,:.fie
Chancerv of Chile, -1736 Has~;::,chusett.s Ayenue, n.}T., :;0Tl1p.t,ime bpt.J.J..eilll 1 l,~~ ro..,'}
Friday', Hay III 1972, ~nd _on 0855 ~;ol1r~_J:E?-s date. ~ _
---------------------------------------------_._~
}of. ('hard~on pori V"e )}'nd",;rs; gned
.s..e£gf1,mt Rn FY Pi dj spat.ched ap:orm--ji".j')T.a);y' Fer'" at
1J35 hours in Cruiser # 2~. -
The u.n.d~l"s~,,"f.:,n~d. T-;2.~?d:v~sesL_b-'!':J,~£.!..__1j~]l~D..~::ft._(l_J·ro.J@.\.-al ..:r(\!L...l;.c~~~.~Lr:i.s-t+at1~~.:_J~_Ql~.Df.:_~)..9_~_~

of t.he E.."nbassv of Chile, that the Chc.ncery Chile Has entered Clnd ~l-·tho offi~Q$ or
..Tore rc.ns<.:.c1:-ed.. At this tirr.e the met:;od of entry or itE::'.~s taken is u;llk'no"om.
}lr.Uavarro'e:.dvises that he ..rill 'contact the Foreign. Nissions D-l ,,-:ision-~':atch CQ);Tolc<UC
'llhen deteWilati on afm) 55; ng ar=t.; c] es j F made. (cont.i nn ed) 23. P/lOTOS -
-.:..---.-----~-- .....-..::.'
,....-,;----__c_---.---------- --·~-----,;--------·I DYES
jam ,. . lusc CPS FOllM 1().2 ~ sU.... uM£"r fOR AO:::ITI\HIAt. DETAILS) Fs:
I
24. SUSPECT'AND!?R ARRESTED PERSONS. IOEN'l'If'Y llY IIA"'E, AOOREsS. SEX, RACC. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMbER. O:l!l. E.YES. ETC.
LAST NAt.lE fiRST MIDDLE ADDRESS
~ 11
LAST NAME
I RACE rEX (E.IGHT
fiRST
I
WEIGHT
r" r" .J''''"'.
~IDOL£ l:~~p.£SS
IRT.'
rSOCIAL SECURITY NO.
~2) rACE . rEX rEI~~T IW£ICHT fAIR EYES I DATE O~ ~1~TiI, ,SOCIAL SECURITY 110. . INATIONALlTY
25. ARREST PD '1 US. AR'lc:sT 110. : 27. "'P.REST erne'EIl INAME MID il"~GE 110.. 28. DATE OF J.R.'!EST I Z!I: -;;:;'-i<-
30. INCIDENT STATUS

8.}( CLOSED c.. 0 UHFOUNDEO' D. 0 CLEARED ay Al\REST
N/A ItDUR: N/A 0037&

,..'
,~:
~
I '..
I' . , , .i .:1
. '::.-;:.~.: i: .:.:': ,.:'~' .. :·~.r.

-/·"'::;.::1 .... y rT ..._......
I,:...:: ::~
r ~.' . ; . '. ~·s-
L::I) _;t.-,"',' 0
1'1..::':':~r·~.·.tt .. rM·;;;t~ :r f~.:.=~~:).T:
I ;~~~S.~;·
'i .::1. i't.. ,~~~L:,.:,·~: :,t.' ... ~L:·,·.·: :;.;(; >1:.
,
•'
.~ .
~ J .-:;
.~ .,', :'
, .'
"/',
-.,. I ITT(:::"C'
"~u_',d_ ")-'U (
"
)
·,···-~~,.-l
.
-.6..1
.... /..1. '-.... 1-;0.:3
L- _
,
-.
. "
--
jam
8. SUSPECT AND/OR ARRE~~EO PERS.ONS. IDENTIFY BY HAM[, ADDRESS', S~X. RACE, SOCIAL SECURITY I/U~B'ER, OOB, £YES, ETC.'
(tJ . ~ L_A_5!_:_J;_A_IoI_E_I F_tR_~5_T_. _1 ._._._Id_I_D_D_L£_·\_--:-L_ES_.~_··_i _._. -"- _
. SEX •."E!GHT I HAIR , EUS' • O~T£ 0':, BlllTH , • SOCIAL SECURITY HO., NATIOHAL/'
ADDRESS I
"
121
'.
ItAC E
~-----:---------:----~---~------;--------------
I .: WEIGHT \. . DATE 0Y. ~IRTH \ .NATIO"AL'·
10. ARREST No.1 ••.1

. 12. DATE 13. IiOUR
.14. CURilCIIT CASE D./SPOSTIOH I . .15. USSS-ID CASE NO•
. ~~EH l' ...."tj.CLOSED. \

1~. FINAl CASE DI~P0S1T10H 1
.OPEN .
.. 00377
o.Yj~JHSI.s~.UURE) I #-
17. F!Ep}!'}IIG 18. DATE' 19. APPF!OV~D ISl}'1~TURE A TITLE). .' \ l ') .20. DATE
~ ~~/~:i" c: (~t,,{{.C4 A7Yf' . .\@ZY\ V\'\ Q..A,\"\ i\.t;L

. . uerBeant Stevens E. Butler 05-15-72 Captain Pete 1;. l-~antbos
.._, ~;. " ."~ s
. .••• - •. ..J ,. •
.._ ...••. 1 ::'.!.;; ..._.: ... "'-"
.'
jam
-
8. Sl!SPEC
N/A
.. FIRST 1
,..0 •.
SEX EYES . D~l£ OF BIRTH I • SOCIAL SE:CURITY NO., .
FIRST MIDDLE I ADDRESS
.
(2) •
RACE I EYES .SOClAl SECURITY tiD. . . NATIONAL/T'!
9. ARREST PO I 10. ARREST NO. I 12.· OATt 13. HOUR
14.·CURRE·tlT CASE 015;>OSTIOH \ . .15. USSS-IO CASE NC/.
"6'.£N 1 . B.~05EO • \ . N/A

16. 'flNAl CASE OIS~OSI!.ION ,
OPEN -00378·
17'~
~( p. ;~,(GJ~R ISI~tl"JfJEI \# 18. DATE' 19. APPllOVED 15~.l'lATUli~1l TITLEI ) 20. DATE
.&'.2J. 4~~tn C.fb,~Lt{(-{ 4;(y rJJ.::-u \0 \-'\,\ Q ......., ~.
ereeartt Stevens E. Butler '05-15-7 Captain Pete N. Manthos 05-15-

• '.: ,;,.:...1.
:;·~·~:;S·_;~/o.~?~
1·!·~i~~/0~/:
~ ~"~ ~~:!;=. :;;~'-;':If.:······ -
! /.J<- /, /
. j~ .~:~.~ ... -=_ (.~.~/
(1)
~
I (2)
,'J
):
I ~
26. t;.!'.~ii...'f\C: Of 1:":J.t.:~1:5 ; .. :~!) lOC;:\TIO;..r Ct" S:JD-Y
--------_.. __._-----_._--
o N):.~
I ~ .0 REU
I 28. TRANSPORTED BY .
I'
!.
I
I'
I
i
I
. I
.,!
··
,
·
.
); I
.,
!
I
I wi c4v _~.5-cP/l/ Sc.e/l/e
o;='~ L <:! I 7Z. a. ~ rE,/: 5. /~~'h ecL,--'--,.4,--T---,-/.._:3_3-:::CJ=--'J~.,.9..:;....."::"'/"-:S':::..L C _
OFFICE USE O~lY
T. T. NUI.lSER . DArE t.. TIME THIS REPORT . .37. DATE/TIME T¥PE NO. 3S~ F<EPF:.OOUCE 1';0.
) I 'ZS 7'/ . S--/ .!>--7:2.. . g t:1tl
39. REPORTING OFi'lc::n UNIT t. BADe;::: NO. 40. STATUS (Check One) 0 UI~FOUNDED 41. UNIT REFERRED TO 42. UCR OISPOSITiC
//2 . /.(u ;/-tzL SO 57;;; KOPEN 0 CLOSED 0 SUSPENDED
,(3. SECQN D OrFICE:R UNIT:?=z...L-B":;A-D-G-E~N-O;".":-'::::;-4:-4:-."';;S:-:U:':P~.E:-::R:-Y:-IS::-O-R=-·-AP-P-R::-o=-Y-n-m--' -------:1-<:':5:-'.-=R=-=E=-V=-'E=-\·:-lE-R------L--'------r::7'H·
J'? / /J'
0 .. <..' uv/l/A///v"6- .
UNIT &5ACGE NO......... / . /
Cu (JJ, <.r/~l-.
7 / 00'3··' 9' lMY
"
PO 251 Rt:YISED 3/71 C' ... ..,~,'
'.
"..
--- w------------------U-N-~-LA-S-S-I-F'-i-E:-D----1-5-
4~-~;e L-----~:-l-t
FtLE
PAGE ~I SANTIA 02473 i 62·3CA I Z
72
"CTIOf.J ARA .. lb
USIA .. 12 PRS .. ~I·

...
/070 W
016973
n l £. c2 11 II Z MA'( 12
F' t1 A~~ £ ; !!? J, SS Y SAN T I AGO
TO SF-eSTATE WASHDe 1236
It ~OLLC~ING IS OUR IN~ORMAL TRAIJSLATION OF STATEMENT (UNNECESSARY

~o~~s OMITTEDIF'ONM~N UNDE~SECRE~ARY PALMA G~VE .PRESS EVENi~G
MAY 101 .Q",lor::. C\..dLEA.N A~1BA·SS.,C'OR IN US Hl,S INr:ORH~D Ti-ils
MINIS!~Y THAT OYER WEEKEND CHANC[RY OF EflBASSY IN WA5HrNGT~~'
HAS F.~ TE.~ED ILLEGALLY (VIOLADA) AY UNKNO\<.:N INDIViDUALS ~H~J p;=\.:J ..
tE(o~r. T~ ~O~CE' OPEN DESKS AND KARDE~ES OF EMBASSYiS POLITICAl
,,;:~ AiRS OFF' I CE. .' ~ ~. t.!
Gt?~ERC~A~CERY OFFfCES~ IN ADOITIONI WERE ENTERED ILLE~ALL~
,,(SEIT ON LEiSER SCALE.PRELIMI~~RY iNVESTIG~TI0N D1SCLoStO ~E~
~~O.vAL OF DOCuMENTSI 800KS, RADiOS, ETC •.t..S R:::SULT 'THESE SERlOUS
~crSj cH;L~A~ Ar.B TO US ADVISED STATE GE?T WHICH EXPR~SSED
f!TS DEEp REGRET' AT WHAT HADOCCURED·
HTI~lS AFTERNOQN-UNDE~SEC~ETAR~CALLED iN US AMBASSADOR
~0 EXPRESS GOC'ScONCERN A30UT SEcURITY OF iTS DIPLOMATIC
~!S~tG~ IN USIREQUESTING RAPID ~ND RIGORCUS INVESTIGATiON'S
l~ EL.I. A S E~ i AI; LIS HMEN T OF POL ICE GUARD TOP REV ENT REA LI Z AT! 0 ~ QF
THESr'LAMENT~3LE ABUSES !OEsHkNESlo
"~OR ITS PART OURG~VT HAS ADOPTED MEASURES TO SAFEGUARD
THESE~URITY OF OUR COMMUNICATIONS AND OBLIGATORY lNVESTtGATyON
(SUMARIO) HAS BEEN ORDERED. UNQTE.
2 ... VrrnlJALl.Y ALL SAN'I'~AGO DAILIESTHI$ MORNING CARRVTEXT OR
~A:T~F~L 'S~MMARIES PALMA STATEMENT WlTHOUT tOMMENT ~RFANtiFUL
CD UNCLAS~IE:.J.ED
~r
00380
._-----
, .' .. ° 111 •
" .•"-.1 .
••
~ ....
..
• 1
.. '
..
•.••... 4 . . . . . . . • . . ·_ . . · · " · ·
Departmel1t of State
•
UNCLASSIFIED
PAGE 02 SANTtA 02473 1623"'Z

~o6!.; NES. Sl a RV BANNER ED ACROSS FRONT .p AGE ,HOWEVER. ev
C !1I\UN 1 T EL .S I GLD ANO. I NOfPE NOE:IT LA TERcER.; GOV't"Y'i
.NETWo
O SNEWS LAST EVENING RAM AGAINST BACKORdP ANNOUNCEME~T
RK
0F ITT EXPoSE Pos1ER,
'DA~ IS
...
.'
.- ,. • , t.!
..... , II
'.
' .. • ...
:.' :
. .\ 00381
I I I u" r .~ c: c. f r: t l:' n
iJepartmellt of State YE[EG~AM
•
.~
...."..
.FILE,
71
ACTl'"'N t..~A .. Ir-.
U.SSS .'J.?: ~ 11,;:- - f~."
INFn OCT~.. ~'J CP:~ ... ~? ~'r-c~3 (
1': ~'"; A F: .. ~~ ~;I p.03 oSC .. ~1 US!A- .

!
~ pqS-~~! i 55-14 NSC-10 RSR~~l
: .- ..•.
\..,.,....
008831
R IS?~06Z ~AY 72
FM A~FMAASSV SANTIAGO.
TO ~ECST~TE ~ASHOC 1218
co ~ FlO ~ N T I A L SA~TIAGO ?4~0
I" f:"('PEIG"! '''P'~·ISTRY SU~.Si:l:~F.:TAl:?Y PALMA ASorE'D ME TO CALL ON

. HIM T n ~ A Y 1\ T ~ , ~ (~ P .. r-t .. . ; :- ...1\J ::; T R:- AD" P S 'r~ R Y F R D l·~ \,' A C ~ I N r- TON
A80U: V!H.1IT"'~)Rll~i F\.:!'R'f 1".'T~ CI-tILEAN EMBASSY - AND KNE','WH"T TO
E >:P F': T.P.A L~1;' EMp·H:'" ~ .,;'11 Tk.\· A'''BA 5 SADDR 'S OF'F I CE SHO WE 1') S I r-NS
o~ HhVING RE~NC~RrF~LLY SF.A~r.Hf:"D F~R PAP~RS ~HILF VALUA~LE~ ~AO
NOT ~F€~' TQUCH~O.HF SAIn CHtLFAN GOVERNMENT ~sSUMED MOTIVF
HAD cCE~ POLITICAL- FRO~ HIS OWN RECENT tXPFQIENtEIN ~ASHI~GTDN~
PftLM~ S~IDI HE ~NE~PROTECTr0N GIvE~ C~1LEAN FMRASSY WAS LE~S
EF'F';:"c I V i:: n.hN IT r-lYGHT BE.:: i-JF. -S"~IO CHYLE'AN~nVf.RNMFt\iT MADE
S?ECJAL 1
5FFtHTp TO PROT~CT u.s" OFFr·CE~ M·ID RF.SI;)r~CES p: SANTIAGO ...
1''' ?;',~r 3F.CA;JSE '~F DELICACY 'IF' n.UR· '?ELAl In~s - AND HE THOUGHT USG
SHOlJl.DALSO STRIVE TO r;IVt: C:fJILFAN ,)FF~CES Ai':i) H";r.-.t:S BETTER THAN
RUN-~F-THE-MILL ~RdTECTJCN. gAL~A A;SUREC ME THA7.G~C HAS ~~
. DFSI~FT~AT THIS I~CI~f:"~T ~~ ~AGNI~!ED. l~FACT, HE AP~[ARE~.
SLIG;..lTL'( TA:«(N AP.ACK WHt:"N 1 "tENTIC'lN:':D THAT INCIDENT WAS ALRf:"AD'f
O~ P~rSS SERVICF. WIRES. .
2. T FXpqF.SS~D PEGRrT T4AT T~CI~ENT HAD OCCURRED AND THANKEO
PAL~} ~O~ PR1TECTICN U.~. OFFICES A1E QECEIVI~G. 'CARABI~ERnS
9 Q o;<r .U~ CE"'hNST~A' r'Or-J IN FR'1"n 0;:- :::ON:iULATE A FEWP-OURS AGn.)
I SAJ~ ! WOULD ;ASS C~ GOe ~;:-QUFST t:"OR INeRE_S ED pROTECTIpN •
.
I ~ "
' '.J
··00382
._~ cO~F I BENT I AI

------......-. ---_.. .......".---.
! ..••. , . '.......•/~
X'f\ sec.'l t'/"},.
t·. • .
,.. I' ~. ~ .. I ':
• . t •• ,. ~ : . '.. ! ...
fORM·DS· 322{OC R}
J08Hb5S I 151903Z
LIMITEDOffICJAL USE -.
I
/
ARA/2C/C':LGIRDL£R
. 5/15/72. EXT 22575
..
. ARA/B C :·.JWfTSHER
. . .: ': ~:.' ...
l-'" S/CPR: HDAVIS ..
. .. "
,""
,- ." . '. ::." ;.~
"~" ~ .
' ...
...
.. '
. ....
SANTIAGO. ..: . .
,' .. '.
.'
•
; ~
'
... "
..
sueJ: .·BREAK":,,IN AT:CHILEAN CHANCERY
.- .:..:. .... _.':' ..~._._~._j,~:_~;~~'~':-;~~-'" ",:., ."'
1 •.:. , CHIl.EA:NJ1i:~cOUNS ·VALDES PHONED DEPT {fISI;ER} fH,RNING
MAY 15 TO. REPORT ·THAT UPON ARRIVAL SAME f10Rt'JING THEY
DISCO.vERE:l>·'PERSO~J·or PERSONS UNKNOWN HAD ENTERED CH'ANCERY'
-..• {APP.AREN·TL~{·SArURD·AVNIGHT.OR SUNDA'fNIGHT} AND 'HAD SEARCHED
: ··SEVERALOfFICES . AND 'TAKEN SOME RADIOS AND BOOKS .. ' DEPT .
. If1tlE»IATElY NOTIfIED' APpROPRIATE AUTHO~ITIES THROUGH'· . .
'. PROTOGOL.A~D~SY CHANNELS~ AND· DEPTOFF {GIRDLER} VISITED. <
. CHANCERY T.O· ,tXPRESS CONCERN AND REGRET.'
. . .. .. . ..
. . '.
.
. ~. ':'\: ~UR'ING
VISIT,' AtiS' LETELIER AND EMBOFFS DISMISSED .
ROBBERY AS POSSIBLE MOTIVE, STATING IT IMPOSSIBLE CON-
CEIVE THAT fOREIGN CHANCERY LOGICAL·TARGET"fOR STRAIGHT.
R08eE~Y AND CONCLUDING THAT REAL PURPOSE WAS SEAR.CH fOR
(.,:;, ·{mJSPE;CIFIED} DOCUMENTS. WHILE TERrUNG INCIDENT ~DISAGREE-"
~. A9LE" THEY MADE NO HINT of, OR REFEf.ENCETO" POSSIBLE
PROTEST OR CLAIM FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE. y~
• • ... ."
"!
.,~.. ,~.
~ .. " .
.- ..... • ...1 ..
//" 'S'7;J TE )~;J ;:,

Ducur.tENT AS REFERRED'TO ••.••••••.•.•.•.•.•.•. ~ , 00383
. ,.,~' :.~
" .
. . L~:::"i,~(~if~; i' \~".... ':. :·~.:·;~:.:?'::·i):··· ..:~>:;.~.: .. :-..:-;: ...~:;';: . . ~:.: .: :.:; ...:. ~~,,··_·,:~ . --:;~.:ry:t.l:fp·p r~3r7~~:,;·ys E."--7-·-}:-:--- " .t-
r:-
! 'l.
".
SUBJECT: Chilean Embassy Break In on 15 May 1972
1. On 24 May 1973 I telephoned Mr. James Robinson,

General Crime Section, Department of Justice and asked if he
had any information as to criminal. prosecution 6£ persons involved
in' a .break in at the Chilean Embass'Y~~iW'~~l.lin&ton, D. C. on
15 May 1972. Mr. 'Robinsonstatedhehadn6knowledge of this but
suggested that it would be better to check with Mr. G. l\.1arvin Gentile,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Secul"i~'"E>eEartmentof State, and
,·the Secret Service siJ:lce theyhadre'$pdttfi~~l~itlesforthe Executive
Pr~tective Service (EPS). ItelephonedM~.Genti~eandheidenti-
fied two State Department cables relative to the incident; one from
the embassy in Santiago to the DepaJ:\t;n.lent, No. 2450, d3.ted
',15 May 1972, Subject: Unauthorized-Entry Outlining the Protest
of the Chilean Govermnent presenteci~to the Arnerican E~bassy,
and the State Department replyto. S~~~iago, No. 084655, dated
15 May 1972. Mr. Gentile also ide~fiified:t~e EPS report of
investigation and suggested that l:g~t;.acopyfromthe Secret Service.
:1 then. calle4! iat Sec::retSe~vic::e and he had his liaison
man deliver me a copy of theEPS 'report ,....
of investigation.
,
:.--,-",_.:;:,.;,..•
. 2. On 25 May 1973 I received a call from FBI Agent.

-I . Istating that he had received
a telephone call f~om Mr. James Robinson relative to Illy inquiry
about prosecution~b Jt-eicated that the FBI 'Vashington. .
'Field Office had reonCC;LCtea the > •. ¥~r?politan Police Department (MPD)
on 24 May and reviewed the repor£~o. 248-424 filed with the 3rd .
. District, MPD which states that acb;;'eakinoccurred at the Chilean
Embassy bet\\teen 5:00 and 8:00 a.m. on 15 May 1972.
0038Q;
~ I ,< .. <
I:>~' t \..-
., .
R.·.e.po.rted loss at that time conS.is.. t.e.'·. ·. .··.d.•·. '·. o.· ·.£.·.·..•.•.£ our a.. m. !fIn radios
and one electric razor. Thepolice;·f#~esttgationidentified
.some latent fingerprints but no ideritification.olthose prints
was made'.. Since the reported loss was under $5,000 and there
was no evidence of a crossing of state boundries, the FBI did
not m.ake an investigation of the incident. TheMPD reported
that.~here had been no prosecution and no' suspect was identified.
, :,,>'
ce:·Legislative Counsel
. Inspector General
,
I ..
.'
'.
, .".:~ .
;":.:.'-.:
.' ~-"':'-
;:'..• i.1
..
N~~es ravealed in Off~ce of .Security rapol~ -
-Retiring .Tune 1973, referred to~Cord for job
-1 _
- Lectured for J.;~ord at lent. Jhn Cell c Planed. to ".,:ork
\there do 'We stan.d with:
steve J\U~.n )
)
Bruce Solie) "rere to have been. interv""iewed
)
I
Pa.ul .Ga.ynor)
I think Y\lJ3has :1ntarviewed follOl!:ing:
,
. John Hart )
~~ose na~es appear ~my notes to see
Ed Ryan )
)
Cord }{eyer )
snB 00386
- "·SffiRi--'---_-
('
26 May 1973
SUBJECT: ,DDl "Trap" <mLeaksofNarcotics Intelligence,
1. In materialp:rovided by theDDI on contacts with certain'

persons on the White H(';)use Staff, there is a 9 September 1972.
memorandum from Mr. Helms to Dr. Kissinger relating the
identification of a leak to the press as having been '~ the BNDD.
The memorandum st~t~sinpart:
. ·.",:~._·;:'::.:X~~~,;i<).>-:.:_ "::<::,:':, :-'> .' _' ,_ .,'
"After notbig?'UiatJ'ack Anderson had a continuing
sourCe forclassHied documents on narcotics, we
arranged a,t;"~p,~othat recipient organizations
oCClA Intel1.tg~ceMemoranda(IM)on narcotics
. j ,~
could be identified. II
z.\
I,"
':
3. Thls cour~eo£~cti()nwas at the initiative of the Directorate'

of Intelligence, without consultation with persons elsewhere in the
government, except in reporting the results to Dr. Kissinger. It
represents a well-conceived attempt to target on a possible sou;c~
of leaks. We doubtth~tit would be susceptible to misunderstan,ding
it exposed topublic'Vic\V, but the fact is that it was something ()f)lUl
attempt to trap 80rn eone,aridit was a part of the gen'eral attempt to .
seal of! a leak sin:iilar to those leading to the "plumbing" operation.
Because of the lattericorieideration it is noted for the, record•.
SiGUrD: c::;" .... ::
~;.f
S. D. Breckinriclge"
;~
,/r/,cc: "I , ,
------
'>~O'O387
I
-- .....'
~;e L~:·.\"~-: l'::,.j;;r c . ::~.~.~~l~:;·: ..::(i ,"·,:~r.:;~'l:)J,:_C·.. 4 •• ~:~~~":; :;'~·:;'C1~::~:i~~..;::~1 ~.'J~ :':-i~.-:J cl!..l ::..y
C~::!~::.;::.-~ S;;·.:: :::'~l 1;=.::;:1 si 0!l .~1.;'J.'" (;~'::;. :~:._::~ 1 ~.: .~. :'~: ..:. s;; i ~"'::::'1 ":~~·"'::~::.~l:: :.:i_:~:!.::·~~ ~:.'j·:~.~.::. . (.::c~)_
J~J..s.? .3. C~=.~_ \.'1 't.~.l:; s • :.20 .. tl~:.~ ':!?('.'J~::. (:-·~:"-. i":?S C:~."\··:"il :;•.:,-~ t;:-l -t.~J'= a- :r-:;::';-?:"':~'~')'~n
l)f· 2':";· ~'~~':':{ 1 ,;;.~ t::·~,".~::~a... t:jG .:~"(.\·t.}.C't ·5.~.·.'..=; . . . .:. ":"~:': ;J ~;:.: ·A~:.:':_·~~~::l t:;:t? ;:'5 ~~~:_.:t:
//
S":.:!b ...:~: .~ i:>::(':':'il:l rl~~.J:2...::::-c.r;~1 (·~l ·~.:..v;. l"-~~:;,:·:",::>::·.::;~:~l lc.c:c.-t.c:::::s
( ·c~a"·""·"s)
" ....... v ..." +0·
v 1::a}:== it, r:.:(::~.:C :r'~=s?(·Z'.l.·.:.:~-e t·:) CCiZl':!":::SS::"J~l1.
!~cdzi f s, 'questi~~.
?2.. i:> 16: P.::). e::J;,le.. 2.1.s ·t.iOll Gf ~l~? tl3.5:!·;;tt.::,·,::::~~e:-:." ·il::·~d for
L!aldng cal.. · ii0g::.. ~~11S.
Tab 17 : ..411 I~-ini tiated :follo~-r-up onl.----__....,-.----_lwhiCh

vas merely noted on p~ge 17 o:f t.b~ o:!:'iginal sensitive
s~ary.
7ab 18; '~lrtO IG-ir:-i tia:t.ed 1"c l10-:.-:-U?S on, it.e:!!iS tl;at 1-le.l'~ l
included in ~the initial Direct.c~-ate subwissioas but ,-rere too

, f:-agrnentary :for-inclusion in our cE;iginal su.::rnai;r.
I
i ?ab 19:
I T::::e tabs are not arranged in any Ivgical cZ'd-=r, because we

chose to place· the bulkier i terns on the bottom of the :file to
IiJake :for easier.. hand1.ing of it. The follolrlng 1s a breakdoYn of
I
i
the tabs by initiator offolloi-r-up. (Both you and Iiedz.i asked
for·E.;. follow-up O!l the item in Tab 2.)
!i
I
-I Dolby-initiated I-ledzi-initiated IG-ini tiated liev submis.sion
II 1 2 1719
2 4 18
I- 3 10
I 5
6
11
;L2
Ii 7
8
13
14
; 15
9.
-I
I 16"
i
lfi1liam V. Brae
Inspector General
00388
, ... :.' ~.
j'i.~.:':·~.;t :.~.',:~; ~!- .:'-.; ........ r:~;. : ... ~ ~~ r::·:. ~·)"';.'L~··.·~1 &"'.3 ~~.~·}l·~';"·:'·$ ..:~) ~.-J
;>::",~ ,1 .~" :.. ~) .- ~ ..:~.: .. :<1. :~.. _ : ~:': _1 :~ 3 :> :_·,··~.,~1 -.J
.~,~..:.':
::. 0 ;., ."
' ..... .
~
. :; ... ', .~.' .:~ : ,,! ~
L----I
( All ~t.erlal is to b9 reed bY' C03 ~c5e.y.

"
I
It is r~uestsd that lrl3teriel be carded. on 3 x 5 caros for

fu~e pcrssib1.e use o It shcr.11d shC".l (1) the nane of the e.-::ployea
in upper lei" band corner,- (2) name of person bei."1E( rep()!oted on ,
(e..g. Hunt, KcCord, eteo)m (:3> event reported, if' significant,and
the word -routi."Ut if' not s1gnifiean~, (4) 1dentlrT...n~ referen~
4
i.e) mmo it, vh:ich L'"1fomntion is recorded o
If an e~ntreported in this tjB,terial is siginfiea.""lt" please

report it 1J:.lediate17 tor handling (either a "jeven a or so~thing
connected vith 'Ratergste and associated events) . ..
P.lease raise any questions that o-:-Ctlr as you pt into the
material. Especiall)", as you get ideas as york progresses,pleaso
put them fo-r...'Bl"'d.
SDB
,",,'
t "
. '-
~- ~ .... .~ 'f
..~,.;.;~:. "ili~". ~4."'~~ :i:icl~;'i:.:~

~'. ,
I.
._:~.;;~~. ;
... .: ,
"~
i
BROE
-
I
(
0."
··SDB;reckinridge
a~turn
r
I
.. (
./
" " C"
25 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Broe ",
SUBJECT : Reported Agency Fundi.r.g of Heroin Study
, ' ' '" 'I. .ORD, in reporting 'asso~iation of employees with Egil
, .Krogh in connection . . with the governmel1~ narcotics
. program,
referred to an Agency funding .action on 30 .Tune 1972 whe.reby. ... ". :-.=-
$37,500 was transferred to OST (the Office of Science and Tech-

,Dology under the Executive) from 9RD's budget. The ~ney was
to fund a study proposed by IDA (I a,'m told this is the Institute for.
Defense Analysis), and was approved by, the DDI, ADD/S&.T.I
I ~cting for the DDS, and Mr. ~.~lby as Executive Directb-o=r~---
Comptroller.. .. .'. ,.
. "
' .. '.
". - --
'-.' ... 2. I judge this to be a proper and normal expenditure witliin
,. the government in connection with a high priority government
, progral;X1 on narco~C8. I recommend that this not be reported as
. ".::' an action subject ~o external criticism.
<,'{ ....
. '- ....
,.c" ..
.... .- . ". . .... ~ ~
~.~. ~, ". 'r.' '.~":-,~:

. ~' .. . ', ... .' ,. .' : ".. .... '~.' .::..... :.. :~.: . .."
. - ...
• tI . ' .
. ~ .', .. . . ~
:
'.
~
.
"
.. . .' . ---"'S""".--'n=.-·-';;;;B--r-e-c·ki··D--:-r·i;-:;;d--:-g-e--~~·"":"· ",:. :~. t

":.°.°
. '
-.0 •
,". ,' .
." ~
.
. " '.
",
..... .~ . ~. ..
.." • • ,;
.. ... . .. ... . . ...
'
. i' . . . ...
. "
' "
.. ' ~... , , ~
' .. '0' '. •

.~
",
'
'.
. ..... ' .
.-. . ..
. . " .
' .. ..-...,' '.
"
," ... . . .
.:
It .. .
}.,
.... :...
. t _'I·
• r,.'· .
, ~' ..
. "\.
(
.!' .. "..
, .
" . .
. :.
....
.,
.'
.- .. - . ~~-,-, "'-... - .... -",-=-._'... '-":",,"-.. :,,,-.'-~-'-'."~--"":~~= -~~:
-. --.. "'!':--' .•
.
.: i
'. ,
- , .. ;
: • I •
'!
I
: '..
- '1
,,
,
.' )I ~
. \
-,'
,!
':, '.:,:""., \i'jc:;,,·':·:irr:

. 1 ~ •. ;"..) 1 '_' ... ) ,..;
. . \ •. ! . 1·,! .. ·~ 1._
--.r~ 'I-E·
"';.' 2 A ','.' "'v
-'-_._--~_ .. "-_.'.~ ... - ..
'(---' -.. r -•."\ .., A
. ! I i'I: ;! U .~~:: ..
i'; /: • ~ :i)
I\L • ,i:~ ..... _
, ·-n
' "... II
'"
T ;',;
• \ .';"'J'
~.",
i-II. u""lI . '
_ ~ •
!)i.'I
:.:;:)\:I J? I15 5
DCI/IC (CIA)
DDl \\'JlSHH1GION (uPI> '-- CI{~ OFFICI.4LS TESTIFIEiJ wEiJNE::iUAY THEY FORGOT
-', "'0 ·r'·JI .·.r··l',·r.:..: 0" ~· .. ·.I---.·~.. R
:):)/.·15<$! I:..~_ 1..<I.. :,I.:i'\Coww 'K -"",- ··,,····-.v· . . . _ ..- ... - .....,
iiii:'.. .~i.2t:.i':t.,;1 ::; 1J.'.K!:..f.dLJ.,
1'--'" --
t.::;";':.::> .:>\'.£1._1:.:-)1:"':-1:., AbUUT
DuO (2 AiiG~~Y;'iGU=i '..iAR.HU(1::> THiY RECEIVED TH.4l THE :.:HIT£ }{OU'::;E ~'!AS TriYH~G TO
:)DS/'f PIf~ BLAi~JE eN
THE AGENCY FQH THE \\'ATEP'!jATE SC.IHd.iAL.
D/OeI REP. LOCIEN NEDLI, D-NICH.,CALLEDTH~EE OFfICIALS OF.THE CIA 10
ONE EXPLAIU wHY THE lETT£K$ -- WHICH HAVE bEEN TRACED TO WAIEHGATE ~t'~';
aSR 'CON3PlitATCR JA~'JES i'JCCORD ~-- DID NOT SURFACE U~TIL Twa DAYS AGO. c:).'.~_
OST (2 "ONE or: THE REliSOrJS THEY GAVE WAS THE FANILIAR • I FOrlGOT,·" NEDZI ~:~~
Ch/OpsrSAID. "THEY ALSO SAID IT WAS A WATT~R OF IUR~INij IT OVER 10 SOMEONE I
~DB ~L~E ~ND AS~J~INGHE WOULD PASS lION."'" r
INDIca THE ~IX Lt.JIERS -- ONE OF HiiN .SIGf-JEu •• JI1,r ANi> THE OTHERS
DDO/DO ANONYi'jOUS -- WErlE SEf\. I TO FORi,jEll ColA DIKECTOR RICHARU HELNS BET\.1EEN
.f"' JULY 1912 Ai~i) LA;)I JAi;LiArlY.
i.A· r-~EijLI 5.';1[; IT HAl) bEEN "?HETIY IH.:FINITELY ESTABLISHED" THAT
OSO bCGCiiO, A fO~L"Ji:R CIA AGEt~T, WAS THE AUTHOR OF ALL THE LETTERS. N£DZI :J~~::-'
mea iJECLINED TO SAY WHAT WAS IN THEN, BUT FiEP. WILLIAN BRAY, R-IND., SAID~\~',
THEY i\lERE "CO~;FUSEf)" ANi) "UISJOINTEO" WARNINGS THAT THE WHITE HOUSE ~..:.--:-;
~~
WAS IrtYING TO MAKE THE wATERGATE BrlEAK-IN AS 'A CIA PLOT. r-
eur ~OTH NEDZI AND BRAY SAID THEHE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT CIA WAS 'IN ANYj
WAY RESPONSI8LE FOR rHE WATERGATE BREAK-IN. I
TESTIFYING AI THE SESSIO» WEriEPAUL GAYNOR, HOWARD OSBOrlNE AND I
~luermez WILLIAM 5RAUX, TO? CI.A OFFIC.IALS WHO HAD CUSTODY OF THE MCCaRn i
:'egco tEI'IERS AT VARIOUS STAGES Al'TER THEY- WERE SENT. . -. t
lauston NEDlI INITIALLY SPELLED BRAU~S NAME AS BROE AND SAID .HE DID NOT
)sborne KNOW IF IT WAS THE SAME MAN WHO TOLD THE SENATE COM~ITTEE ABOUT
'roe ME~TING~ HE HAD WITH ITT PRESIDENT HAROLD GENEEN TO DISCUSS THE
~s.ynor CREATION oF' INTERNAL ECONOi'lIC STRIFE IN CHILE.
liP I 105-24 05: 12 PED .
t
(
Comment: h- ..
-'
00392
~ These comment~ represent the initial and tantative.reaction of
the Office of Current InteZZigence to the attached item from the
news services •
.- '1-'- - ~. _. ~-.~ -. __ ~- . -- ---- -.-- ----.-- --..,...,p-----.. -._~--. __._ __ .. _._ _~_ ~ __ .__._ _
_.... ~. ",
, .
f
' ...- ...... .....
~ -., .r.;~·""'''''· ~- .. ~
I
•
•
( '(.
c /
L .
.
J
:, .
l!.;
I
.. j .J!;(~i
;.;;-~\,:
i:.'
.. -.,._._--_.... __....... -~--.. __--
. . -.
--~
( (
.!
·.l~1
! - 2 -
I
I·:>
I
,
!
L..
00395
. iii ..:' .. "," :
!
. !
!
;
I
I
I
,
II
-,
I
I
I
!
2
, .
__,
.. . . . · ·- .. 00396
7
;., -
~. :
. ~ ~,.
l:r, ~,:._, _1,-,;.:,·,',t:·(~ \:, ~;f~;)~i';'"f1~i'J,.••..... '
. ; . : ::... ~. ".:';: "
- ' , ,
i,,' .
:. ,. ~'.:"
. . ,," ,", ....
MEMORANDUM'FORTHE RECORD
"":':." ",
'SUBJECT: General:" Watergate ',',',

Speeifie::::Tom Parrott1's Involvement with David
" .• , .
. :' ',.,
We met with' 'i'omLatimerthis inor~ing'to get from hini theoIlly

existing copy of the sensitive attachment to our family jewels rep9rt '"
',' in prder that wemigbtniake a temI)Orary stayback ,burn copy. "Atthat ' ,
.time', Latimer said he had a call iD;' to Broe to report that when Tom , :':'
Parrott was DCI duty-officer some time in September 1972 he received
'some calls from'David Young. " " , v',;,;/.:;C;
calledParrQttls:~~lne(~~ pe'r:~~:'\:?;g-;::",'
I,' {.,'.:
': .'
. ',r "
I 7-3512) at' 0925. The ''''-,: ,,'

r··, answering, preswnablyMrs. Parrott, gave me his telephone rit.U.hbei
at the EnvironmimtalProtection Agency' (755~0533). ,I ealledParrott/
there and told him that I would like to meet with him to debriefhiin ': ,.,' ::
on the s\ibstance ,olealls he r'eeeived from the Whit e House Wheri:h~::.',
was DCI duty officer in September 1972. ' Tom 'said he would', be happy'
!...". to meet with me but that he saw, no reason why h~, coUld not give rp.e " "
, the information over the telephone'. ...... ,.
: '.'
: ~ .. '.-'
.
,': ,Tom received 'a eall.from David Young at about midday a". . . .. .'.,..
! ,,-
,j Saturday. Yo~gwas callingahout that .inorningts program by Dan
I .'
j
, ,
Rather .in whieh :Rather includ~d material from a classified rep'art.
Young wanted to, come 'out to the headquarters building to' seeP~r'~6.tt.
, ; . ~.: Parr'ott star,ted chasing it down.:lle spoke with Bruce Clarke \vhohad
i..~.: the DDI duty.': It turned out that Rather I s comment was made :onhis, :
program of the preViotis day andth.at it was based on a report that·, '
'came out of George Garver1s ,shop. The report was' distributed 'in "
,only seven or eight copies, and only two of them had gone, outside the
Agency-- bot~' to Kissinger. ·"~.L,",',
~:; ~,;. :.. )~ ~/::.::i' . : ..,.',..,
, Young gntlost trying to find the build' ag and did not ~;:;~.iv~\~.nti1
about one. By then" Parrott had identified the Carver report~and; had
a copy of the, distribution lis~., Young was shaken upon discovering·'
that the only e:derna,l distribution was to Kissinger. He \Vas,extrem.ely
.... , .
".'. : .. '.
"~. ..,'.
" ,'1',/1
. ;.'
". ".
l
i t,;::-~~''''- ·"__·",.t.• - ;'. ~.' _.. ,' -, .
' ' ' : ,why·heha.d r',e·c:e.i.ved a: copy::·~e wanted to
know if anY.. oft4~AgeIicy .•. . ::,,:.':; ,
.. ~~Cipientsha.cl:"talkedwithR~ther. Parrott calledThu~rn.;~r.,·at.h(:)lne .,'" .
':andfound tha{Ao·reports had:,been made ofcontact~witb.\.~~~1J.e.r. ,.,. .,'
Young reInai,~eCltotheeffectllthat'swhat" theysaY"a~4~:~¥~(ii~each ., .
. of thes·e people 'bad been interrogated. Upon le·arning tliaf*b.e·,Agency
had'done notliiiigabout the·· alleged leak, Yo~g left in,»Uff:~~y~ngt.hat
he would be, back in touch.:, . . ,.. .. ; ;:'··;':::·,'i:::\:\·':;';· ", ..
, . ' 'i.::.·:,:::' . .. .' . . .. ~:.:;»;<:;~~';:}.~-i::!'''... .'.
.... Sometime later Parrott got the transcript of the Rathei' broadcast•.
Ra.ther' s com:rnent~ bore ()nly a remote connection to the conteht of the··· .
Carver report. Parrott cannot now recall specifically what theCary:er
report concerned., Rath.er did imply criticism of·the Presidentin his
brq'adcast,· .andthis may have been the basis of YoUng's co~cern•• On
Monday, Parrott got in touch with Carver, and the two of them met '..'.
·with Helms arid briefed him on the episode. This is thela.stParrot~
heard of it. . Parrott . commented that he had no other contacts .. with . :,'
;I . ,.
-,1' anyone· remotely'.involvedwith Watergate or related m:att~rs•. ,He.,.'

d-
·!
·thinks he may
have written a m.emo for the record of.the'Young epi·sode
:f., . but is ~ot "s"ure" . . His dut: secretar:ma: remember. c "TIii~'w6.uld have '
·1
'. i been eIther I ~ _ _ ~t 1S also'
:1 . .possible, tha: . . oaxvez lILa e a IvLIA 1 Ul llIa.. ."el. . . , ."".',,.' , .
!~.,
i, .
r
,.,
:.'
, .,
.. .I ·caUed'·;6~'~~er.
He said that he then had a m:~~·J::~i;;~ill,
5· :.:'
which will reach us during the course of ·the day."';):.),' ,..:.
:'" i' ,
I:;
i; ',I '~eports that she bad traded the d~tY:";t~r.c":"'-.----'-'--'-.-I·
~at wee end. I ~hinks that Parrott "wr,~te a ~e~o
,"oj:
I':j· .
i "--.o=n=--:J:th:t::'e ep1sode, ",but he woUld have kept only a chrono copy, ·and hls
i 'J
i·· . . chrono files were destroyed 'when he left~ She has. lio ideawha.t might
:1
··1
,, have bappened t~the original. " ' ,',' ';,Jf:'':~t~i~ll~~;':}' i" .',
:'· ·1i "~\t'~:' ~..;::; :.;:;'Y:>;'~t:J~:;(::F~~;;,<:; ..

"':';:":".:.
·i
I .,
i
,
i
"
l
: ....
.;,
, .
.,:-,; .
, ..
, '! ...~ .':.
f:.: :~ . .' ,"
....~ ':;."'-~;' ~:::~~./:~." .

',"
· :;":~.;':' 00398
",' '. ." : .; ....
>', !. ....
"
. '\-'.~
,. ·
~ .
2 _.,'
· .
<~.~:.~:,:P ... " .
~··r.~· ... . '- --. 9u
;~·
., •~ ", ' :·"1.
.. ~:..,
. '. ~. . .
.:(
.. .....
,
.
' .' ./
..:' ";0' ,-,:.~.
.' SUBJECT:~B:?;.let'¥t~ofthe Bpecial SUbcomnutteeonIri~,t¥l1;gen¢e

ot:a:oA'~eArrnedService~Comn1ittee .... '.' ".
• .. ' .
. . ..... ..', . '
1. Thismoi;riiJ;lgMessrs. LawrenceHoU:stOll~GeIle'raltoutl~el;
. Willia~ Bro.e,,'lnspect()rGeneral;.Howard Osborn,"DiJi,ector.of'S~curity;
PaU1G~yno:r,,·~:',q.~~~!fU~·~'?\l7ity,i~~e~ear~h Sta££;a,ri?l.· ' .. ' I,
Se cretary:,~o(g~p;¢£l,4'l'.:YJ:'aJ;ters, 'appeared befo rethe)~g;ye:c~b:<:<:>~ttee'
about AgentY:'act~,.. on<le,t,t,ers rec~ived:.;lXio~"'"'~~~j~M.Q,p6:~P~"::i:he
"> , ' ,
meetirig lasted~f,tO'!C .,' ,~t('houfs"to '1245 'hours~' '·~'r,~;~:.W~~;\(li'~:··'!te;dlihic·al'

',sweep o£the,'room,\ "?2i:,§ "Rayburn. Iiouse 'OfficeBUilcU,ng::;and,the:rooIIl'
.. ;:a~CO~:~~11.:,:l~~~~j:~~·~~iC~~~
.Counsel. ' '<~"," ,
·:~~f~.i::~~t
. ". . I.
, Luciell;)~'~":Ne;:dzi(D ~~ '·Mich.),
"F'.E~hy.ardHe:berf(D.~ La~)
¥¢~yfti~tic~'~(D.iUl~J. • '
, ;Willt~~·G.B~ay:(R.; Ind.)
u,sii..~:C'.'Ar(mds(R~, , m.f
,.. BPp,:,W:ilson(;a.,. Calif.) "
3. Present from the sta£fwere:
'Fr~D.kSl~tinsllek, Chief Counsel

.;:,William'Hogan
"
"- '
. -'
.,,!,o·
:' ; /., "
"
·t··,
;l:~'·t:r'i;'f'I~i;~;J3~;·';~ni~~Jl~;;ri;jg.\~~~r~hNed~i;'? "~n,'"Ol,.~:at!. 't\ne.' ·~pJ.:

r" ", ,c~, .· ;•• li.oustonrather.s~;y,erely for:~li~.{,
.. •". .• •.
. . , ,:'.
. .Ol:':k
rt
e "l'n".'g:
r~, ~.
40.. . ,
:
:Mr~'Housto·D.jhC1.d aconversation'With,Nedzian.cfs"" . i.#sHe.~,:atihe~'Onclusion'
.Of.th~.:h~atUi~;J;anti·:it;se~fu~d,h~,,~~s'.ii:Bl~;·thdi~P,~J: ..9.~~\:Pr.th~ir;' ~ort:bern'~' .,' ','
5/'~F~ii6~~:~tion: ~:l4
.'
. '"
"..a';Th~"GOmmitte,,',a~k~dl . . .•. . . . ·li~~;"~4~~~Pies .

oflier. ,sho:rfACi,lld note sof.the't1:lemorand~)ig~.h;S'p~pre~ared
., . "'\i;,.::~~e~;~~;t:~::::~.~9Pj.e~ oft!l~~~f9i<:;!'i>PY:Wl\iFh.he.
'.. . d;;~?~#3~~t~·· .They aSid ~~ilte cxactdat'
:..,~ .~/r·~- ~ " ..,.(
':-;,; " ." .>.'::.. . .:----:..:...~~~~:..c....:..:...~_____'____I

. : ·:!:Kf':i.:.f·.\.:;{~:io~:f: :i;' .y!;~;:\, . .:.,
i." . '~" .
I.".
;" '
'·00400·
-.'.: " .. '- -.' .:
/ ( ),
(
-,
.I
23 May 1973
On this date Mr. William E. Colby and the writer held a

meeting with Congressman Lucien N. Nedzi. The reason for the
••• ~ w.,'
n'leeting was to review with the Congressman material sent us by
the Directorates describing the Agency activities that had flap
potential. ,
. At the outset, Mr. Colby advised that the Director had issued
instructions to each directorate to come forward with descriptions
of activities (especially involved in the domestic Bcene) that had flap
potential. In addition. in a memorandum to all employees of the CIA,
the Director had instructed all employees to report to him any
activities the Agency was conducting that they construed as outside
,the Agency charter. Congressman Nedzi requested a copy of this
Agency notice be furnished to him.
The full report, including the sensitive section, was discussed

with the Congressman item-by-item and in most cases he actually
read the text. This took two hours and the Congressman followed
the material with great care.
,
With regard to the item concerning Mr. 'McCord's letters to the·
Agency in' July and December 1972 and January 1973, he expressed
.astonishment that the material took so long to be surfaced and when
surfaced took so long to get to the Director. He was very outspoken
in ~l:S criticism of the people involved.
I will not try to set forth all his reactions to the material. which
I believe he found sobering, but I will set out hereinafter the items in
which he showed special interest:
a. Alien documentation furnished to the Secret Service.

He desired more information concerning the reason why
issued, the use, and how controlled.
01
I
J
b. Financial support to the White House in connecticn

with the replies to letters and telegrams as a result of the
President's speech on C,ambodia in 1970. He requested
more information on this subject.
c. Beacons furnished Ambassadors. He was interested

in the number issued to Ambassadors and the position the State
Department took on the use of these beacons. He was interested
if the Department of State was pushing this program, as he
believed they should.Qt.
d. Logistics' acquisition of police equipment. He

questioned whether LEAA. Department of Justice, should
not be doing this rather than the Agency.
e. He noted Logistics furnished telephone analyzers, and

desired to know what they were and how used.
f. I
L- ----J!
g. OER'a crash project concerning Robert L. Vesco
requested by the DCI.The Congressman was interested in who
outside the Agency instigated the project and why was it stopped.
h. Several ORD projects indicated research done without ,

knOWledge of the host system or on unwitting subjects. He was
of the opinion that this was risky and recommended it be
terminated. He stated he would like to see a directive go out
to the researchers concerning these practices.
i. John Dean's request re Investors Overseas Service.

He reviewed the six reports that had been furnished. He noted,
however, that the item stated "there were multiple channels
to the Agency from the White House" and requested information
concerning these channels.
j. Alien passports. Mr. Colby advised that he planned

to review this whole subject and the Congressman agreed with
the need to do so.
- 2 -
'.
(
The" Congressman noted that in connection with John McCone's

consultative role with the Agency the Director had stated some time
in the past that he planned to take action regarding individuals in this
category. The Congressman requested a report on what had been done.
Mr. Nedzi asked Mr. Colby if the Agency had considered how
much of the information just reviewed with him could be made public.
Mr. Colby stated this had n?tbeen doneyet, and~'poke to the question
of S'O\1'l'Ces, meth_s, an.dt"dmpact on~the instit\li~n. The~ngress
man stated that in the current climate he felt it was necessary to open
up more information to help clear the air. Mr. Colby stated the Agency
would give the matter deep consideration. and added he had been think-
ing of a general statement along these lines to be used at his confirrn'ation
hearing.
The meeting ended at lZ o'clock noon.
(Signed) William V. Bro~
William V. Broe
Inspector General
Distribution:
Director of Central Intelligence
Mr. Colby
Office of Legislative Counsel
NOTE: The above listed' items, except for item j, are being pursued
by the Office of the Inspector GeneraL
- 3 -
00403
,L
.r
23 :<ay 1973
r '.-.,: ,..
-;'''
~ ,:=. !.. --- -( DlrCr----
Di recto-
._. _. --------- _. --'- _.__.--- --------------.---- --_.---_._--_ _.-_...
.. -. -_ . -... _----- -_." _..•-_.
Ri:?lACES FOR'" 10- 101
F02\4N°'101 WHICH ,.,AY 9£ USED.
1 AUG 54
'I., J;i:\VTT
deposes and says as follows:

1. I n~ the Director of Security of the Central
Intolligenco Agency~
2;.Th"e purpose of this statel:l.ent is to record,,"

,to tj13 best of my knowledge (ir~J recollect:i.on~ CirCUf,ls:ti1.Aces
involved in the roceipt of a series of unsigned corr~spon-
dence rac.eivod. by the Agency during the period from 1 Auzust

(,
1972 to 7 ,-,Tcnuary 1973. The si2nif~icanca of these lctter~
is that by their conterl.t and by the hanUWT'iting on tHO of

them, they a~e believed to have been" \'1ritten by James W:~
,. Cor,
iyiC d J r. ~ O:1e or.. ...' ~.. , •
L-ne ue.i:C'i1u.ancs .
lon ...l.!\~
. t..... ..
H'-tt..crg<lt..e .t··
r1.8. 1 ..
3. 1-1y first involvement in this matter occurred

on the 2nd or 3rdo£ August 1972 \ihen an envelope addre~sed
to HI". I,ielnls, then Director of t"he Central Intelligence

Agency, with no return address, and postoarked SO July'1972
was routed t~ my desk fro~ the Director's office as a routine
piece of "crank mail". The envelope containell a carbon copy
of a typewritten letter signed "Jiml l ;·ilth the nar.!e in the',
salutary a:<1uress excised - "Dear II

After tlisj:lissing
.... --- •
the liiter as a piece of crank ~ai~, I had second thoughts

and racognizcd the handwriting on the en~elope and the
signature "Jim" on the letteJ;' as bein~ similar to that of
Mr. McCord, who formerly worked for Me as a security officer
before his retirement from the Agency.
,r
00405
• • ~' f
~.
'.
'l' ~
. ~'.; " :·.·1 "~. ~': <~ :';; i .. : A" ':.•J
I '." "
.:. t ~:~ .~.~ l' :'.: : ~ .:~~ i,'" ";.'..:.~ :,,:,..:.~ :"~ "~- ;..;. :~ y
.".'J
,'~ ~'l\r_...... I)':.t 'J.,~ !1 r1 ~.......
'. :' ,e. n " :.....1l' l' (' h '~_)1 by ;·jr. :.:,: c;r) '.t·cL
. ~i
'J'r to 1. d.
v.. •.,. • •':'I.-.\..1. ...... ... .~ ..' .,... ..' oJ
'.
SO;.le reflection, decided thC\t he ',.,'01.11.1 like to have" a .1;hgal
Gcn~:n":.ll Counsel of the Agoncy, to his office :--..nd had hi~;l

~.
f
reac1 thele'tter. After he had finished reading the l·?tter
... \. ~
l,.JJ, .....
-...... \~~ .•..,.. \7
~_J. .. ~.•_J..,J.J..:..,.
,(l:l'
J. ,·,·'.ss+.. . n
;J~ .. y, .:.J,.;V.)..,
... O
·l. th\3 bost of ll}' p)collcction"
centered about,·tllether the Agency had any legal obligalion

to forw3rd tho letter to tho Justice Department or the,Fed~ral
Bu.reau of Investigation. Both ;,7r. ;{clms and }:!r. HO\.lS'Lo.n
;(
dc~idod tha~ there was no such obligation and I was to~d to

h l'~
.1.0 0. J 1
t}e ett.er· f·l
l.n a secur01 e ·~n ray 0 ... l.ce an dta
f,c* }(e. no
further action on it. Mr. Helms instructed ne to restrict
},
knowlodge of th~ existance of the letter to an absolute
mini.:mm m.l.'1lboI' 0 f peoplo.

5. The next envelope received was addressed 'to
" 1'-
. Mr. Pa.ul Gaynor. a. staff chief in lJly office and a former·

close friend of Mr. NcCord's. on or about tho 23rdof
Decembcl' 1972. The next envelope received wns addressed
to ~.lr. Gaynor's residence and ','ins unda.ted but postmarkod
27 Dece~ber 1972. The two envelopes contained one or nore
unsignod typewritten pieces of correspondence which appeared
• ' Is.;
to relate to }·Ir. NcCord's involvement in the l1'utcrgatc "nffaiI'".

Doth of these letters were handcarried by me tOl1~s.Elizab~th
2
·. .00406
.......
\...
'.
~ . • 1 .. ~ ... ~
- .... ~.. :.~~ .. : d
. :~ ..~' !
1-- \..
!.:: ....~) .~. ~.'.:::>,. ~f··~. A.·\) r·(~t:l"f;~·.f.l ;.::' ..•.. ~ ~:C:)·S~.lI'.i!lJ..y LYti~~~~ to j~':'l!11(:q""11
.. 0' I.... • "'! I" • 1. ~. l, .:.. ~. ::~ '.: t,:.:'
o. , .,.t_1 ')'1
\ • .1 ., 0'
.,
,",~:i.
,01,. 1"\:"':'~'l."'T'
'.. '" to )
1 :'17"
..J
• • .J "':'.:1 ()
\. .. ~ •• T·.·;·"·"'···y
.l
' • t , .. .j . Il~/3
. eo) ''''
:"lli'~l·
'j·h',,,,,.,,,, t.,. _ i'~". :',1:"1)
.. .. ..,':."
f •••• "
·· 1 -, . . . . :-
;.11."-;;;>
t
• It' t:' '\
.......t_ • .:"'
.. ' ,;..;.1 ~\
i ',.!........ ," ......j to, 'i'"
... .I1 .. ~ •• ~~"vl.l ~"I' 'I'"
,oj j,'\" ,", .~ '.
~I . . . . . I"
,t"
too
..: .
... 1
to
0'
t~.,'.l..........'
.. _
~i··I·J ': 'I""("':~
u ..,'
.... ' •• •• ) __
'0
.., "
V
by ~ir. Gaynor at his res idon ca ~nd pro>111>tly .<;~cli vured t~o
for ~lnd. Sl.lbSeCl.1,~n.t . inclusion in the securo file.
but a ,.;eek or so later dolivered to him a. .fol.der with all

copies of the letters lie had received. As I recall, rJy
l"oquost to him \-:as for guidance as to ,,"hat action shoulcl .

be taken lofith :regard to them in the light of his depart:uTe
fro!J the Agency inc.ident to his nOlitination as United States
AmbnssD.clo:;:-':"d~~signa.to to Ira-n. After rcviC:l.dng them, he
in£'ormed .me that he did not see any. reason to take any :~action
at that time, but :lskod that I shm., them .to Hr .. Houston

and if ~~~ Housto~ had no objectio~) I was to retain them
in a securo file a.nd take no actio:J. l'Iitb. Togard to t.r_em.
As I recall t Mr. Houston '-las out of to\'ffi at the time and

it was 'severnl days before I had an'opporttmity to give
him the folder· with the copies of the letters in it for
review. After rov.1ewing them, he informed me that lIe had
no objection tathe instructions Mr. Helms had given me and
I so infoTned Mrs. Elizn.beth Dunlevy~ secre't;ary to Mr. Helms.
7. On 14 May 1973, Mr. William Broe t Inspe~tQr
GeneT""l of the Agency, and his Deputy, Hr. Kenneth Greer,

met with me in my office in connoction with an investigntion
thoy 'olore undertaking at the' direction of Mr. Schlesinger
to <1ctcrmine if nnyone in the Agency had any contact J.rith
.. '
. ..
' "~
.....
\. .
. .
'.' ,
',-
.: S:', ~ ~ :" •
t • :
• . • ";: t ';',.; • .1 . :".: : .
..... t .,
. ..'
,.. / - .
tho '/::t . ·..

~""".-
·f ~':; .....
t"""~.,
••t. .... \.~
~ .....
J. ''::'":':'''
.I., J 1 '..... t'. ....•.
.'. I·!·l'r
~ i> ... : ,', ..... 't,~
I J. ..... ...,
~ .• , 1.·'J~~.;.i
_ - ..:
__ .~·i.'~
",. 't.~t.·.:.1.
_ :'-,."'l';-
_ __ ""' ••.... ·:.~.'·.·.:1
_ ._ • .llo ,.,''1-
I" _ '~.'.:~".;...!.'. .'.'.\:;
...J,. ~_·O
'l".
;,:r. HcCord since tho 11s.tcrgatc .L~c J.dcnt.. (I );u'Jscqucntly

c1ctI31"i:l.inad I'1"'O::Jl f·IT.. Gaynor ';:hat he lH1S not seen or talked
1970.) I 'also told them that a r.Ir. Leo Rosenbaum, an Clilployee

of 'A
t~lC "t
gency). 1H.1·d rcques e d an a,pol.n . . .'..'i!.l.
men£.. · "-h me · "
0 .t1~SCUSS
the fJasibility of contributing to ~~. r..ic:Col-d' '5- dc£cmse. fund

.i
and that-! thought I had convinced him that this would be
inimical to the best interests of hinself, the Agency and
;··jr. :·!cCord.· I <1150 stated that Nr. R0sen:;aum. h.~d calle"'dr:le
several ''leeks ::l.go to say' t'hat he \'las well known as a clpse
.r:'
;.TJ.en d 0 f J·~r.
,. McCord t S and night be called to testify a,F the
,:
current Senate Hearings. I advised. him to seek gUidande
in this regard from the Office of General Counsel. I.do not
know that he did so. I then remembered the envalopes and
correspondence purportedly originated by Hr. McCord. i briefed
l·!r. Broe and .:-Mr. Greer on the circumstances involved in the
receipt and subsequent handling of tl"leT:1 and made a cOPl' of
each of them and delivered them to lvJr. Broe the next day.
I 0.150 gave a copy. at the same time, to my inmediate supervisor,
}·ir. iln:rold BrO.. . . IlJ:lan..
8. 'A few days after this, I was contacted ~y
Mr. John Greaney, Office of the General Counsel of the'

Agency, who :lskcd me about n.ny official or unofficial 40ntacts
anyone in t!1e Agency had had ~iith }:1r. l·lcCord. I mentioned
00408·
4 'J:~'~'.
'.: ~
11."0
'.y
" .
. . ....
' ... '.~ .' . ,

.';.;r .~. " , ~ ." •'. ,) I
~"
.- . :
..
'.'
.~. ' ~ :: \': " . .;.. ~_~. '.,.;'J '.1 • .~, ~. .::
.. ":* . '.:
' .
. " '- .'"
I,. OJ.
.'·.·r. :~'L'
~.
,,-,.'
1.... :t...~.,V .....; "I' C.')'"
£1 ..!. ;..... ".:1
IAL.\.:.'l':' ;.} .) ...
u •• ;", .. L.
}.,.,.
Ir.:.. •~."'-J'11"
\ .. \1 ..... -,••.
J. ;,.:1... ,,~.,
,,;;· .... ...... ~
:..~·.\,"L
....)
L.. , . }t
#"'J r • .. '..;\,'\'--"''''-1
.'ri·' J =-'.,.1;
..... ,~: : . ;, .:. yo :.. c : ,~'.!,) I \ .: ..... ~ ... I';' • ;~~ ' .. ' :. :- ~ . : : t,,". ::: ,.~........ • *... \ 'i" .~ =to
....
! I011.~. ~. t ()11 ' •• \ } ,
) r. . ··l,.,~
... ·)····1 ~.... L..
1· ' "4;." ••
.... ' .. ~ J
..,," ....
~
J •
On .<oJ.
c.. \J.5 5:1~1~ =I t C, I \'Ins lnSt.·ru
c,a ..... c"'''''d'
c..;,. Dy \f
i': r • v,. : ,,:"
·"5 R. . . ..:>Cell' ",_.! .. · :.r ,
••1.:....>..:..,.1,::.
!)1:t0C tor of t:1C Centr;1l Intel1i:;cnco Ag0n.CY,· to i?artic J.ya tc

in cort3in Congressional briefings on th1S
. m~ttcT and to
i
prepare this affidavit.
9. Up to the 14th of Hay 1973 ,,·;hc~n I infolTt'~d.
I"ir .. Broe and l·tr. Grecr of the envelopes and their contdtits,
the only p~Tsons kno..·,.le:dge~ble of the existence of then,
in &ddition to Hel::1s, J··irs. Eli:!'abeth Dunlevy,
~e, \','tn"3: !··~r.
'it
his. secretary, Nr. Houston, Mr. Paul Gaynor of my staff', ~
!.,
Mis5 Kath1)'11 Aldridge, my secretary \iho prepared the f'~le,
~,lr. Loo J. DUlin, my Executive Officer, kn~:H"" of the fi'r~~'

.t
envelope and correspondence but not of subsequent enve ~pes.
~, .~
10. The. only other matter pertinent to this' ·r:·
particular matter 'Was the fact that an inteTl:1ittent 'so rce
~~r
I,
.
. of this Office J who ,,,as a. close personal friend of ~lr. !;McCord t 5
has reltlyed to Mr. Gaynor and his staff certain information

L
~~.
concerning the personal situation of Mr. and 1-1rs. McCord during

and after the time he WOos in jail and since he has been
released on bond. This source has been utilized by this office
for ]:\Emy years ~nd by r.1Y dircction, no effor.t 'ias r:laue.·to sol ici t
infol'i:'lo.tion from hin about j··II'. HcCord anu the information provided
was dono so purely gratuitously.
Hmiard if". Osborn
Subscribed :md SHorn to before me, a NotanT Public, in and for tho
Couaty of Fnixfax, State of Virginia, this ;13 day of' "\-/~ •
H~ commission' e~Pir.es --4-'~ d·~ /21£ . ---£~-~---
\'.,
00409
lSI .,U~L~· d i;;;"~~
" ! '..
0" ,•• )
····l·'··'. .-: , 1"',',"

·1·:·.CC··~D
~ ~." to J.• '. ~I,I
Bin >~,;1.:::f)n l~G.;.l,;d ~;-;;:; ..~ ... , -, :0 ;:cdv~:,,~ t:~:'J.tl

had told hin.1 thatl-l~~ the tirn.e he was m charge .:,f
narcotics rn;:it1(~r::; for the DDP, knew Liddy ~nd \':2.5 pri)~)3.::":Y
i:~-\.:-ol\'''~d \Vit!·l l:unt·. _;\t th?.t :::;';":0·':11.:':= ti1°ne I..:ou C01':c:.n . . ::·?ts \:.. ·c-!'''-::~.)lg·
::"t the Whit~ r-Iol":::;~ apd i----l,iant-:.d to rneet CO!~f;;in. f.t is
_____._lunde:2.stan(!ing ~t may have introduced I I
to C oneln. .__
Iqueried as to what would be the best procedure.

The \,-:-r-i'-c(;;-·'r-a-dvisc:d that we s houId interview I Iconcerning
his ::-~!.a.~i'~ns with Liddy, Hunt, and Canein. and that this office
would do so.
Brae
neral
00410
Jt BI. . I £Tn AI I II Ii iNn-RNA! liSE ONLY
23 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: All Employees
SUBJECT Agency Inyp~Y~.ment in the Watergate Case
1. The leadership of the Agency continues to make a deter-

ITlined effort to investigate all aspects of Agency involvement with
the "Watergate!1 case or any of those persons connected with it.
The results of these investigations have been given to the appro-
priate legislative, executive, and judicial elements of the Govern-
ment investigating these ITlatters. Each eITlployee has been asked
and is directed to report to the Director any knowledge he or she
has of the Watergate affair and related ITlatters, any persons con-
nected with it, or any other illegal activity in which they believe
the Agency was involved in any way.
2. In consonance with the foregoing, anyone who has had

any connection or contact with individuals on the attached Ii st, or
anyone in their offices or anyone purporting to act for them or
acting pursuant to their authority, should report these contacts
fully. Activities of these and other individuals include not only the
Watergate affair, but any investigative work on the Pentagon Papers/
Ellsberg case and any contacts relating to the Executive Branch and
White Hous e efforts to locate and stern leaks of c1as sified informa-
tion to the press starting as early as July 1970.
.
3. Any work done by anyone in the Agency on any of these
subjects, or any knowledge related thereto, should be reported to
the IG through the appropriate Deputy Director, or directly and
personally to the Director.
"'81:11 til STRAT I 'IE I NHJHHL !lSE Obi' ¥ 00411

........
{
ASIII til S"f ~;H I \'~ f WTF PNA! II SE (. (
4. It is imperative that every piece of information

bearing on thes e matters be reported immediately for evaluation
by the senior management of the Agency. The public interest
requires that all information be produced and reported to our
,..,pve r s i gh~~.ommi tte es;,,(.on a clas $;~fi ed bas i$,;..i( n e c e s s arxJ so
that the Agency's actual role will be clarified with respect to
various charges and speculation.
W. E. Colby
Executive Secretar.
, /
CIA Management Committee
Attachment (
APPROVED
'.~12
C j~~
.Tames R." SChlesinge
_/ Director
ADMINISTRATIYE - INTERNAl "SF ONlY
0011/10-
AC . I. 13HAT I 't'E IHTEiHlAb: ")'~ ON' Y
Attachment
H. R. Haldeman
John D. Ehrlichrnan
John Dean
Egil Krogh
David Young
E';'''-{oward H d ' r i t i ; . \ i i r i . .,~.
q. Gordon Liddy
James W. McCord
Charles W. Colson
John J. Caulfield
Eugenio Rolando Martinez Careaga
Juan Rigoberto Ruiz Villegas
Bernard L. Barker
Virgilio Gonzales
Frank Anthony Sturgis
HH41 NI ~TIHT I \IE = ! NHRNA! nSF ON! Y
00411 h
OJ.
MENORAm-JUM TO : Exflcutive ecn-etti1"y
CIA ¥@na~ement C~ru~itt$a
SUBJ&;'l' L001'l of Televisimi System to Secret Service

for Use at De~iooriltic and Repu.blican t{ational
Conii''3n tions in 1972
;-'-;"A-'-·
o~'\)
10 The attachedAsummary reports the 10al'\ of televisim
equip7Mlnt b:r the Agehcy to the Secret .::i ervica for utJe during the
Democratic and Republican National Conventions last year. The

eqUtpment was for usa in helicopter aerial survoi11ance, primarily ~~
crowd control. The assurnp+.lon is tha.t H wns used for that purpo!:>'e o
The equipment was recovered in .\Tovember 1972.
2. The transaction seems a strai~htforward arrangement,

related to the legal re!'lponsibflity of the Secret ~ervieoo
Howe~Jr, the fact that the, ~en~ probidod the equipment fo~ usa
in a dcrmestic political situation c~~l~ be presented in a different
light o
WVB
0041.2
: Executive Secretary
CIA l~nap'ement CQmmittee
SUBJECT Drug Te stinp': Program
10 11ie a t+ached sum~'lary trom ORD descri.bes research
into apf:'havioraldrug.. r.on~J'tl~~ati.Orts witlJ,,,,Cal'i 'Duckert t

indicate that the reported drug was part of a largar program
in which
~th(:l Agency had 1~elation5 loli th com:nercial drug manufacturers II
W'herakr they passed on drugs rejeetad because of unfavo~able side
effects. The drugs were screened with the use of ADP equipment,
and those selected for experimenta.tion were test9d atl _
Itlsi."g monkeys and mieeo Materials

-----,na~V:J"'11..."nRg,.-----------------.J
ni/further interest, as demonstrated by this testing, vere then
tested at Edgewood, usinr~ voluuteer members of the Armed Forcos o
2. The program was termln:<lted last fall.. The computer prograr:'t
remains in the machine, its final disposition not yot havlng been
decided o
3. Carl Duckett emphasizes that the pro~amwas considered
as defenslv.e, in the sensa that we would be able to recogni2e

certain behavior if similar materials ~re used against ~~er1can3o
WB
~
!!""nr't'1\"'
......
... .... ~..:
ORD-2550-73
23 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Science and

Technology
SUBJECT: ORD Involvement in Domestic Affairs
In surveying all of the people within the Office of Research

and Developm.ent in search of specific contact or knowledge of .
Messrs. Hunt l Krogh l Young l and LiddYI an additional incident
, . in which ORD supplied equipment for domestic use was uncovered.
It is attached. I have also provided the additional information you
requested on Projectl land projectl I
1- s~aYV'i"rlSe~S"tn:e:r vn:e:ITln:lS"- - - -
Director of Research and Development
Attachments:
As stated
22 May 1973
SUBJECT: General: The Family Jewels Sxercise

Specific: Meeting with Colby This Date
Brae and I I met with Mr. Colby at 1115 hours today. Colby -to
asked that we ~e him with fuller infonaation on the following

items:
'\\ () j . ' IAn EA_.. ~~~rsiOiC~rOJe?t~-Hhat- do- the-se-.. agent~ do

V .J.JL1:g~~.ta t.e 6~-"'-Hlm-t sor:cor-reptrrt:i:ng-and-t--e-whom? -' __'--'
17 D-r~e..§..._Of ocr's reports on "Rest:tetffi---¥eY-th" and B12C k EaQi:-ee8.~

__ .Get dpt.a-i-.l.~.I:fb~ cryoge-11:i-c-ma-gae-:toma-te-r. .that i£. used"lm- unwitting
~9 ~¥\ --s-ub-j1=~-r"t)I'.:.;.., i - _ - _ ~
. ,'\ ~"':fDrl:.Co~~;o-J;C~I;...tGHL:'tlarff~f'-cc~Orppi!l-ee"SSuO't.L
'"""t:trl'I11ee-:sS':1t:xr!M-e!1p~Ojjft"'1'r:~snsrt:e!1nrt_L;-tl;;e-o=il!MXtifrI~
\)D ~//" Eie leling 1'01' J onn Dean. on IOu.
Jp r.l I For whom? For wh~ t purpose?

r-
V V~lL- ----;::::::========::::;--- _
/ ...give Coloy a rundown 0I1'--- ----'~-
./ .Gi-ve Co:t'b;y a copy of FR Division's eontribtl.:t3:en;-

,-- L..- ----,
·'
0041.5
.. ,
BULLETIN
----------,----,
No. 359 21 ~lay 19/5
Tile foiiovring sUltem2nt Vias fl1<lde by Lieutenunt Generel V2~~non i~'. iJalters
during a recent appearance before a Congressional Committee.
On 23 June 1972 I was ordered by a phone message from my office
to be at the White House at about 1300 with Director Helms. I had
lunch with Mr. Helms and we went to Mr. Ehrlichman's office at the
~Hl·it[: House. p,.psent \·!Ji~re ['ir', Ehrlich:'r:c:'~:: ;~{'. !·~21'~:~2·::':;~·1,~ :~~''''~ ~·;,,:~';:"~s
and myself. As 1 recall its Mr. Haldeman said that the Watergate
incident 'NilS CJ'.Jsing trouble and v:as being exploited by the opposi-
tion. It had been decided at the White HO~S2 that! ~ould 00 to
A... tl'na Fa'I DirO(·t' ('\'" (:,"av rInd r::>il
"'" .0' • '. 4 ...... ~ .....,. ',. J ....J .. .M "-, I.. .'
1,'; ••: th.,f-
• -, t , ",. .'
r: ... ·~ tr:\t- 1·~'" ·P·!1'~
..•. -". , _~..... ,~, .' 1i '.,
C:">
-.'.
.::'~':.~
~ .' ' - -. . -."
were arresced~ furtner enquiries into the Mexican aspects of this

matter might jeopardize some of the CIA's covert activities in th~t
area. An appointment was made for me to see Mr. Gray at 1430 th~t
sa:;:,:: d:iY. I '.·'2iit CV8t' and to'jd Iliiti thct I h3d Deen directed bv top
Whl.' t e 1,1.0 IJ::>- e 'ff'
Ole,. a l'S tvO t e 11 h'1r1 th'"
". a ,.J ,_,h._-:.·,• •1n;
fl'''t . 1!o_....., +;r""\-l-i,....,
" .'" " '~'t-"1
1.. ~ r-h,~ ! 1',:, "j _ , , __
Mexican aspects of the Watergate episode might jeopardize some of the

Agen~y's covert actions in that area. He said that he understood the
agr,.::t;nent between the FBI and the Agency t~e~E~rcling tlF~ir sources but,
... • J __ • (" r'~"'" 1 ." rat :,'d \,;U.J......
t l') " ~....t- t h,' ':: '..1"1·.,1':: .........
:> "illl(--' f I..., . . "" <,
"- I' ,,'~',
,VU ~ ,i ,"iV....
C' ,0
II ...... f) ~ a
(, .'" \, "j. \.) ~. L....
l'" :'(.1;./'"" "g' t',;",,,rDl'1~1
1'...... a. '-r....
\or -:r:. dh....
\'11. th Cg regard; ng sources. On my retutl1 to the Agency I checked to

see whether there was any danger in the Agency1s covert sources if
the Mexican part of the investigation continued and ascertained that
no one helieved that this was the case. No one had any knowledge of
the plan to bug the Democratic National COii:1Htee.
On June 26 the Counsel to the Pr2sident John Dean calledcme and
asked me to come and see him about the matter I had discussed with
Haldeman and Ehrlichman. He said I could ~heck with Ehrlichman and
I did. He said I could talk to Dean so I went to Dean's office at
1145 on June 26.
I informed Dean that I had ch8cked can:fully to s'~~: ',;.'h,::;ther

there was any jeopardy to the Agency's sources by a further investi-
g(1 t i en 0 f t}1e 'f'1-:~f i c? r S\JlD"'C '?s of t 1, i~" ~~ "; ~ '~4 -~.~.... .~' ~:-.~ t·;:, r't .~.. ,... ~.: ":! ~: ;': ';. 'i~ "':. ....:.:.: 3
none, L:.:~~n 'Cf~2:"1 (t~)1<0(j \~:1ether -t:}-:-~ Ci,,:\~ ;:-:.~:.:.:t::: h]\J2 ::~'~_;i i·~,:,('t: in t;·;:2
14atergate episode without my knm'ring it. I said t Jt this was not
00416
-
•• < , .
': '
-2-
possible. I knew that the J.\gency had had no part in the operation
against the Democratic National Committee. I therefore could not
say that further investigation would jeopardize Age~cy sources. I
felt that someone had bungled badly and that the responsible parties
should be fired. He asked w~ether there was not soma way in which
the Agency might have been involved. I said that I had checked with
Director Helms and was convinced it was not. Any attempt to stifle
this investig~tion would destroy the effectiveness of the Agency and
~h.~.,.fAI and :\·I\,.tJ~J)~ "; ;V't';r: r1iss?r';~:-::~ tc th:.: ?r.:;s1',:::~::. ': "]uld
j' • . , ~ . ; " • ,. , ... ': ~: ':: ..•. :.~ ..
-.' .~, I
~ (·2~J i'; .';(1
,...: .~ ,n . ", ',' ~. , .
The following day I sa~ Dean agdin in n1S office at his ~2qU2St.
He again reviewed the Watergate Case saying that some witnesses were
getting scared and were lI wa bbling ll • T :-",i~ th'.'\t r:o n;~~tt~r ho'!! sCJr:d
they got) they could not involve CIA because it was not involved in
the bugging of the Waterrate. He th2n asked if the CIA could not
furnish bail and pay the suspects· salaries while they were in jail,
ll:'; 1r:.~; ::'.J'/~:: i"t 2.1 ct i en fu i~: j S ":; (1r -;: h-f s ~·l'! (C':..: ~:. f; "
I replied that this was out of the question. It would implicate

the Agency in something in which it was not implicated. Any such
-"'-;',"i"'1
l,;.;.'v~ ...... !
L,,:
UJ ,.,')(>
\,,1.,... t'cci'Je"
J
f"\..; ..... wo":",'';
,~f....t ir"p-IY
ll!ll " .'lr)·
u. ..,.,t'i,,;)~
l~" M'\., ';:r(j~':
I \... . ;~j n' ·in:·~c,,·t·
j'i-'"
j,,:.~ . ..... ~)
I.... I\.... ;'-"';::-1
.(... :- ..... ;1"rl
.. ,.il",.
I ~ '.:;';d ::':;".:. :>2 ·:x pc.r<.,\Y' ~G '.. :./ s:..~c~rj ".:·>:::::~;)d. it ~\'0Ui\~ 02 a 'gre.V,? d~;s
se'rvice to the President ad the countty and would destroy the CIAls
credibility ;'/ith th:;; CcnC\tt:ss and t!;(;; 0'::0012. I \';:00"10 t't~S'\9n rather
than do this and, if C':... -:l,?r,:;d tD dt) it.;'! ~ , ~".~;ld":·.:~: :;~ ~;·2.:; t;'t:1 Pr\~s~i,;:,.L
to expl ain the reasons for my refusa 1. Fut'th';;l"filore, when the Agenql
·e:~~·::t:d:~d 'fends ~n 'th2 U.S" 'n'~~ had ~:::i (~;:>~J~"c t!ir::; to tnG O\f~~rsigtd;
COllunittees of the Agency in Congress.He vias much taken aback by this
and agreed that risks of im)licating the CI~ ard FSI in this matter
'flou1d be enorr.:ous. I s~dd tn<tt \'1nat \.I::>~. n·"
~. ,,:,'1,-(.',,1 "'1'\'.''''" C0'.lld
b:::CCilla (1. mortal one. ~'Jhat has no\'! ? 1l~:onv(;~tic.H>:;l explosion cou1d be
·turned i!1to a multi-megaton explosionl/. I again advised him to fire
the responsible parties .
.n,qain Dean sent for me on the 2dth of JW'2 and I saw h-im at his
oT~f';Ic,••,':I" l.:.t,. 1", ':10 th" f· ri"
'-'....
..
-.J
VOl." n '1:' .; '."'.' .•' .... ;'.:'.'1' '," ,c."
..,Uil \A\,oo
of
.... ~L.,.J
h.'" < ·!.o:;
Il'~ .r.;::.·... ~f·,':>fl
....... l c ••
-I v'!' 'r'l'I' '19
;.d$Jt..
_ ~f:'-'~~"l-.....
-J.'
~l\-{"'" '~\.l I
more about CIA involvement. I repl~ed thet t~e~2 was no involvement

of the (\gency in the bugg i ng of the ,,.:dc2r9.1te. He th'2fl aSK!::d rlhether
I had any ideas and I said that I had none which could be helpful.
Perhaps the Cubans who were anti-Castro might have had a hand in it
but the CIA did not.
Gd ,] U 1~/ 5 I Y' e 2 e i V~~ d a C6. 'I i '1: ~~ ,,';'~ .'.. <= t. i tJ ->;'~: :.-; t () {'of t h(! F3I Gr:: y
sa.y i r~ q "t h3 the r 0 U ~:"1 n".. , :: ~: ~. r -] .:". : ' )'"\ t- ~. - ~" ~., ., .; .;- .',' . ~; -' ...~ >.:; .: .~,: <~ ~~ ::.: :;,
aspeC'cs of th'js matter ut".1ess he h2d a fcrlial 1ette.:-' frofP the OirectQt
r,~'~ ~ Y f\ ,.... ..... t"'~ -, .... , 'I,~."" { l .,
...
: ' ';
; fw. ;
~~
I .... ' : i •• ;; ,.-; ,), {~ ~. ~;.
-,
"
-3-
I told him"~hat I could not tell him that further investigation

would jeopardize the Agency's covert sources. I had chec~ed on this
and it was not so. I had ascertained that General Cushman had initially
authorized the issuance of some equipment to Howard Hunt without knowirg
its purpose oU:er than it \'iZ,S, oS I :lndel~stbod it, to shut off "10c:i,s".
This was long before the Wcttergate bugging. Since then r had carefully
checked and there was no other involvement of any sort by the CIA in the
operation against the vJaterqat~.. I sai.~.",tJ~,9t I relt.tbat atterr?J;~t,., >
C(J II 2 f' t r~ i s u..~~ i]'(' +.. .; ~ c: ~..') . . '~-"'.~.~~! '..... ~. ~ .: ~.~ !:.'~: "; .~:, .~
..~., ;.. . ,.".... ': ~ ,~ I •• '. -r~
. ..... ~ '!,'
t i",::'~ ~A '~,,'~ ~~ ~.~'

.. ~.
•• : s ;-'.: ,:~;(; ;~;.-~ l.:.:; [':'/" .:~:.~ '; d:~::n t
'.,i \,; ..;
,:l: I,
\";~')L: 'j d hi !/2 i1(j ~'-:J ;"'l. '; n " i:: :~-: ;:~.; ,;.,j;,.:'~~: :)U i .~.:~ 0; ·2f.:r-:;' ~·~~d .. -, .~
is:. :,' ~ . H:.. .:~ .:.~ 'f ~,l .;:, :.:' _i ::~ ~.: ; '.: ': ~i ':1 >"~.' -: .,~:,,' ~ :":.--:
-.:
il:~'~"~(-~ ~j' G;:' C'~{ .·'~I,0j';\':' i'~'~ ,.j",ci ;.;~ ~cc· ~.,.~:s Pi"2~~i~~r2J to res')l;_~r: on ~::j'j'is
issu[~. I 9,:',12 Gray a l'j;J't of ·~:-:c E.ci.~i;~FJ::nt the i'1genc~,: ha(j ~rIvn:'l Hi,;;:::
and the account of our dealings with the former CIA employees up to the
termination of their employment with the Agency long before the 1,.r:1t,:r::,,'t?
episode ..
I saw Gray again on the 12th of July and gave him one additional
memorandum regarding t,ne cont?ct f'):ri sbprl ~!~Jnt. \,!;? ~.s·.!i -:··:,~::~r,~ r:~::~'~ ~:.~(
reitc~- .. }tin~! t;,·;~::: f'}~jS'; t'icn \i'~::; /;:::..:1 t(~:<·:~;'-j ~;r{~viously. 1 SiJ:o ',::';:~:~ J. ~"12j t~:-ic
Dean that the best solution would be to fire those responsible. Gray said
he had made the same Y'8COfnniendati on. Once doa i n we aCireed that ,myth no
that mig~t damage the integrity of ~h2 FaI a~d CIA woCld be a grav~ dis-
sC:r'\:'i:2 tD th-·:; ~~·;~';;·::;·id~:r:t ;,:t;·,d ·~r, ..: ~~ ... :·~','~";;~:2r;·~:,
In February 1973 shortly ·~~tCt Dt. Schlesirrg:-:r ceca.:;;.:; D-ir<::ctor J.

tcld him of my conversatiolls'\,!ith Haldeman, Eht~l;ch:n,:\n Cl7ic! Dr;an. In
February Dean called Dr. Schlesinger to see if the Agency could get
bac ~ from the FE r t h8 ma. t er i f\ 1 it. r:: ,! '52'"1 t to t '->~ '.; '.: ::!~'i-: 2 :':: ,..;. t~;,·.-:; :',::
concerning our contact with Hunt. Dr. Schlesinger and I agreed that
this could not be done. I attempted to contact Dean but he was in
Florida. On his return I saw Dea~ at his office on February 21 and t01d
hir~ ~\::t \';'Q ccu":d not &5:< t;'t',~ F::~~ !~0i" :~l'ie lilatet'ial back. '(flat \~iou'lo or:'iy
serve to.imp!icat~ the CIA and I could ~ot and would not do it. I had
seen Actlng tBI D1rector Gray that ~c~nlng and tol~ him of Jean's request
and our refusal. He agreed saying that he could not do such a thing.
Since that date I ave had no further contact ~/ith Dean. The abJV2
represents my reco'j 1ect on of \'ihat occUi'red and the dates are checked i 1"1
my appointment book.
DISTRIBUTION: ~.LL EiWLOYEES

oO~1,1'
~{ .[ If'
,.
I \! 1--.
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

WASHINGTON. D,C. 20:50:5
OFFICE OF THE DIR.ECTOR
9·.:May 1973
.~.'->."., .. ., ..
"i' '''"''''''
MEMORANDUM FOR ALL CIA EMPLOYEES '.: -' ..~}.
1. Recent press reports outline in detail certain alleged CIA

activities with respect to Mr. Howard Hunt and other parties. The
presently known facts behind these stories are those stated in the
attached draft of a statement I will be making to the Senate Committee
on Appropriations on 9 May. As can be seen, the Agency provided
limited assistance in response to a request by senior officials. The
Agency has cooperated with and made available to the appropriate law
enforcement bodies information about these activities and will con-
tinueto do so.
2. All CIA employees should understand my attitude on this
type of issue. I shall do everything in my power to confine CIA
activities to those which fall within a strict interpretation of its
legislative charter. I take this position because I am determined
that the law shall be respected and because this is the best way to
i.. foster the legitimate and necessary contributions we in CIA can make
to the national security of the United States.
3. I am taking several actions to implement this objective:
I have ordered all the senior operating officials of this
Agency to report to me immediately on any activities now
going on, or that have gone on in the past, which might
be construed to be outside the legislative charter of this
Agency.
I hereby direct every person presently employed by
CIA to report to me on any such activities of which he
has knowledge. I invite all ex-employees to do the same.
Anyone who has such information should call my secretary
(extension 6363) and say that he wishes to talk to me
about Itactivities outside CIA's charter. 1t
AOJolIfHS"FfuiHVE H1T~PNAJ "SF ONLy
00418
.. )
ADM} RoO.:rI'l1i HHERHAt tj3E ONtt
4. To ensure that Agency activities are proper in the future,

I hereby promulgate the following stand.ing order for all CIA employees:
...
Any CIA employee who believes that he has received
instructions which in any way appear inconsistent
with the CIA legislative charter shall inform the
9Jrector of Central In~tlJigencej~~diatelY:;;~.,
~~~/k!. 1t4L-r'
<:-~~S~R. Schlesinger
Director
ADMINISTRATIvE - INTERNAl "Sf ON! Y

• •
..
DCI STATENENT
BEFORE
SENA~E APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS
9t-iAY 1973
0041.9
, ,
OPENING STATEMENT
Mr. ChairmaIT, I am here to discuss the questions which have. arisen

over CIA's real and alleged role in events that occurred in 1971 and 1972.
I have opened a detailed investigation into the precise nature of that role.
I can report ~O you on \'/hatAgency records, now being intensively reviewed,
reveal at this juncture. However I do not yet know that I have all the
facts in the matter. Nonetheless, I am p1~ased to present to you such facts
'" I will certainly provide you with any further
as are now available, and
details as they come to my attention.
Let me start. with the Agency's relationship with Mr. Howard Hunt,
whose testimony has recently been made public. Mr. Hunt was a staff
employee of the Agency .from 8 November 1949 to 30 April 1970. At that time
n2 retired from the Agency. He performed one editorial job of writing up
a recommendation for an award for one of our offi cers, i nNovember 1970.
He was not pai~ for these services, although the Agency placed the sums of
$200.00 and $50.00 in two charitable nrganizations for. the service performed.
In early J~ly 1971, General Cushman, then the Deputy Director of
Central Intelligence, received a telephone call from the White Hous~. He
was informed that Mr. Hunt had become a consultant on security affairs for
the White House, and a request was·made that Mr. Hunt receive assistance
from the Agency. The minutes of the Agency Morning Meeting of 8 July 1971
indicate that the DDCI (General Cushman) reported a call by John Ehrlichman
stating that HmoJard Hunt had been appointed a Hhite House security consultant.
On 22 JUly 1971 Mr. Hunt visited General Cushman at the CIA building.
According to the records, Mr. Hunt stated that he had been charged with a
highly sensitive mission by the White House to visit and elicit information
00420
·,
"
-2-
from an individual whose ideology he was not entirely sure of s and for that
purpose he s'aid he \vas asked to come to the Agency to see if he could get
two things: identification documents in alias and some degree of physical
disguise, for a one-time operation. He stressed that he wanted the matter
to be held as closely as possible and that he would like to meet the Agency
people in an Agency safehouse. Agency records indicate that, in the course
of the conversation, Mr. ~unt referred to Mr. Ehrlichman by name and General
Cushman acknowledged an earlier call from Mr. Ehrlichman to him. The
Committee may desire to query General Cushman whose knowledge would not .. ,
come from such secondary sources.

General Cushman directed the appropriate technical service of the
Agency to be of assistance to Mr. 'Hunt, based on the above request. On
23 July 1971 Mr. Hunt was given alias documents, including a Social Security
card, driver1s litense, and several association membership cards, in the
name of "Ed~vard Joseph Harren" similar to material he had been furnished
for operational use while he had been an Agency employee, under the name
of "~dward V. Hamilton." The same day Mr. Hunt was also given disguise
materials (a wig, glasses, and a speech alteration device).
By calling an un.listed telephone number given him, Mr. Hunt arranged
several additional meetings \'/ith Agency technical officers, the dates of which
cannot be provided with precision. In these, he requested and was provided.
a commercial tape recorder (in a typewriter case) and a commercial Tessina
camera disguised in a tobacco pouch. He also brought in a then-unidentified
associate (later identified from press photos as Mr. G. Gordon Liddy) and
secured for him a disguise (wig and glasses) and alias documents in the name
of "George F. leonard."
004 c9.0 0-
-3-
The Agency~echnical officers met these requests despite the absence
,,
of the procedural steps and approvals normally required by Agency regulations ..
However, they became increasingly concerned at the escalation of Mr. Hunt's
requests for. assistance.
, ?':'" .
These finally inc1uded,a request from Mr. Hunt to
.'
be met on the morning of 27 August 1971, upon his return from California,
to have a film developed and returned to bim. This was done the same day.
He also asked for a New YOrk mail address and telephone-answering service
for operational use.
The technical officers raised their concern with senior officers~
who noted the possibility that these activities could involve the Agency in
operations outside it$ proper functions. As a result, again according to
Agency records, General Cushman telephoned Mr. Ehrlichman at the White House
on 27 August 1971 and explained that further such assistance could not be
given. Mr. Ehrlichman agreed. The request for mail address and telephone
answering service was not honored. On 31 August 1971, Mr. Hunt contacted
, ,
the technical officers again, requesting a credit card, but this was refused.
Mr. ·Hunt had also made a request on 18 August 1971 for the assignment of
a secretary he had known during his Agency career. This was also refused. The
earlier-furnished alias documents and other material were not recovered, hO~lever~
except for the Tessina camera which was returned on 27 August as unsuitable.
Since the end of August 1971, the Technical Services Division has had no
further association with Mr. Hunt. As a point of reference, I would note
that the break-in of the office of Mr. Ellsberg's psychiatrist took place
on or about 3 September 1971.
0042~
· ,
-4-
The Agency -Outlined the above events to Mr. Patrick Gray, Acting
Director of the FBI, in letters dated 5and 7 July 1972~ and a meeting on
28 July 1972. A series of questions were asked the Agency on 11 October 1972
by 'N~· Earl Silber-t,
."
PrinG,~J Assistar;ij:...
Unite~?,~tes AtE9J.;Piey
, .
for the
District of Columbia. On 24 October 1972, Attorney General Kleindienst and
Assistant Attorney General Petersen revie~ied the 5 and 7'July transmittals
together with additional, more detailed but undated materials, that had been
provided to Acting FBI Director Gray on 18 October 1972. The Agency is
aware that this material was reviewed on 27 November 1972 by Mr. Silbert, who
asked additional questions on that date as well as on 29 November 1972.
Written responses to the foregoing questions were provided on 13 December 1972.
An additional submission was made to the Assistant Attorney· General Petersen
on 21 December 1972. This material was discussed at a meeting held with
Assistant Attorney General Petersen and Mr. Silbert on 22 December 1972.
All of the foregoing materials can be made available to the Committee if it
so desires.
As a separate matter, \·thich vIas not known by those who prepared the
material for the Department of Justice in the fall of last year~ the Office
~f Medical Services of the Agency prepared and forwarded to the White House
two indirect personality assessments of Mr. Daniel Ellsberg. The Agency has
had a program of producing, on a selective basis, such assessments or studies
on foreign 'leaders for many years. In July 1971 Mr. Helms, then Director,
instructed Agency officers to work with Mr. David Young of the White House
Staff relative to security leaks in the intelligence community.
, ,
-5-
Nr. Young requested a study on rr-lr. Ellsberg in the latter part of

I July 1971, which Agency activity was apparently approved by Mr. Helms.
At that time~ Mr. Young supplied raw material consisting principally of
newspaper and magazine articles together with some State Department and
Justice Department papers. The first assessment delivered to the Hhite House
dated 9 August 1971, was judged insufficient. As a resu1t~ there were
several meetings between pro Mal10y~ Mr. Hunt, and Mr. Liddy, in which
classified information of the Justice and State Departments was introduced.
One such meeting occurred on 12 August 1971. Additional material ~qS
transmitted by Mr. Hunt on 12 October, and another meeting was held on

27 October. These meetings led to a second version of the assessment,
dated 9 November 1971. This document was delivered to the Executive Office
by Or. Malloy on 12 November 1971. Agency records 'indicate that Mr. Helms
had previously communicated with Mr. Young indicating he had read both
reports.
~
In another contact "about October 1971," an Agency officer arranged
to provide Hr. Hunt certain unclassified materials from CIA files relative
to a 1954 French case of leakage of Government documents. These were
delivered to 'his office at the White House.
In closing, I would like to stress several conclusions of my
investi~ation so far:
a. CIA had no awareness of the details of t1r. Hunt s I
activities. The Agency's impression was that Mr. Hunt was engaged
in an activity related to identifying and closing off the security
leaks that were so much a preoccupation of the Gqvernment at the time.
00422
-6-
b. The Agency clearly was insufficiently cautious in the

initiation of its assistance to Mr. Hunt. Later, when the nature of
Mr. Hunt's requests for assistance began to indicate a possible active
involvement by the Agency'in activities beyond its charter, the
Agency terminated the relationship and refused further assistance.
c. The preparation of a profile qn an American citizen under
these circumstances lies beyond the normal activity of the Agency.
~
It shall not be repeated -- and I have so instructed the staff. This

shall be made a part of the regulations governing such activities .
d.
.
As Director, I have called for' a review of all Agency
activities and the termination of any which might be considered
outside its legitimate charter. In addition to requesting this
review from my subordinates, I have directed each employee and invited
each ex-employee to submit to me any cases \vhich they may question.
I am determined that the Agency will not engage in activities outside
of its ~larter but will concentrate its energies on its important
intel1igence mission.
. , .. '. ,.-
i
~
') ".'\
.
8 May 1973
DCI:
Sy Hersh's provocative teaser for the day:

"I have information that Cushman
knew exactly what he was okaying when he
gave approval to assist Hunt ... "
__--~~a~ttentioned Sy H. again to the
statement 'e had given to the Times already,
«( 0 im I "noted" 'vhat he hauto say
today.
He has calls in for you, Houston~
and Colby.
.;t,'n f
;
AMT !!
!i
1
rI
cc: aGe I,
~Irp'
LP"!"e Colby I
Ir
!
I
I,
t
!~
.,
1
\i
t
;
~~ ..... -- - ~ •.. ' .•.. - ..
00423
. ' .
.'
o .
. RESPONSE TO PRESS INQUIRIES CONCERNING MR. HUNT'S
GRAND JURY TESTIMONY
THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HAD NO
ADVANCE NOTICE OF ANY SORT WHATSOEVER OF THE

-.
BREAK IN BY MR. HUNT OF THE OFFICE OF MR.
-
ELLSBERG'S PSYCHIATRIST OR OF THE WATERGATE
"-
INCIDENT. THE NEWSPAPER REPORTS OF THESE TWO
EVENTS WERE THE FIRST NOTICE TO ANYONE IN THE
AGENCY;' ALL AGENCY INFORMATION ON ill R CONTACTS
WITH ANY PERSONS INVOLVED IN THESE INCIDENTS HAS
BEEN REPORTED FULLY TO THE DEPAR TMENT OF JUSTICE;
AND AS INVESTIGATION OF THESE MATTERS IS IN THE HANDS
OF THE COURTS AND THE GRAND JURY, ALL INQUIRIES
SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
00424
8 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary, CIA VJanagement COIllIliittee
SUBJ}~CT: Potentially Embarrassing Agency Activities
~le Office of the Inspector General has records on the

following sensitive subjects that either have been or might in
the· future be the source of embarrassment to the Agency.
The report of the Board of Inquiry in the case of Hans Tofte.

The Tofte affair was fully exposed in public, of course, but
the report itself is closely held within the Agency. This
office was designated as the' custodian of the report, and we
have the only surviving copy.
An annex to the Inspector General's report of survey of the

Technical Services Division done in 1963. The annex deals
with experiments in influencing human behavior through the
administration of mind or personality alteril~ drugs to
unwitting subjects.
An Inspector General report of investigation of allegations

that the Agency was instrumental in bringi~1 about the
assassination of President Diem. The allegations were
determined to be without foundation.

that the Agency was instrumental in bringing about the
assassination of President Trujillo. The investigation
disclosed quite extensive Agency involvement with the
plotters.

that the Agency conspired to assassinate Fidel castro. The
story first appeared in Drew Pearson I s column and has since
appeared in Jack Anderson's column. Hhile the columns
contained many factual errors, the allegations are basically
true.
~ El:·'!'".
b'i"i1'
"". H ...
"f
,'.:-, _
'~
".. r,. r4
_ .....jh~'~~.'..,···~·~t.k~··
t::.b.., V.II M
:~'
: .:"e'.
00425
Page 1 SDS and other student activist grou;I?!
~I produced in December 1967 at \{alt Rostow's request a

30-page typescript study of the SDS and its foreign ties.
In the SUl~-er of 1968 ocr produced--again at Rostm·,'s request--

lit paper on Restless Youth. The first, and most sensitive section,
·A<ia:$ a philci~~phicaltreatment of s%'udent unre$t, its mot:t~tion,
history, and tactics. It drew heavily on overt litem ture and
FBI reporting all SOO and affiliated groups. The second section
comprised 19 chapters on foreign student dissidence.
Pages 11 & 12 Black radicalism
OCI began following Caribbean black radicalism in earnest in

1968. Two p.apers '-Tere produced on the subject, one in August 1969
sud the other in June 1970.
OCI was asked in June 1970 to \lrite a memo 'W'ith special

attention to links bet.teen black l'aclicalism in the Caribbean and
advoca tes of black power in the US. The memo was produced in
typescript and given to the DCI.
OCI in 1968 wrote periodic typescript memos on Stokely

Carmichael's travels abroad during a period when he had dropped
from public view.
00426
..... ~ ••••••••••• , ~ __ ..: • _ ~_ • .:. n .. .. ~ •• ..:...~ • ..::.':._'.~ _ •• ~ ••• - • • •- _~_.- .
, ..........
"-'"~ -._,,_.:._---:.._,
"
'f' ,.j
I
Page 23 Prohibition against CCMnrr vs~ US citizens I
In September 1972 I Commo to conduct hearability
c0!I!6erc1al telephom cireuits
tan:....c..,.,e............
tests of certain HF lox1g=-OJO........,s...."......... I
between the US and Soutb America. T'ne circuits carried drug-
related traffic.
i
I
\:
.. :-
l.....
........ "
targeted' .~ .
. . ~
t:.
citize~ .... ,
:'1
Testing in the US of ORD-developed eleC'tronic collection
systems occnsioI1~ll:r result in the collection of dor.:estic telephone
conversations. lYhen the tests are ca:Dplete" the intercepted
material. is destroyed. "
CIA I )echnicMns conducted tests intbe l-Iiami area in

August 19-71 of' DF gear intended for use against a Soviet agent in
South Vie'tnam. \fuile 'Wholly iIlllOCUOUS, the tests preceded the
holding of the conventions there ~nd could be construed as
being s~haw:'re~ted to them.
In February 1972 CIA asked, an official of AT&T for copies of

telephone call slips relatil1g to US-Chima' calls. T"nc operation
lasted ':for three or :rour months and then dried up. cae stated its
belief t.hi1t the collection of these 'slips did not violate the . . ~ .
CO'..mnm1ca"~lous'.uc·t since eavesdropp1ng 'WaS not inyol'\"ed..
Page 29 Mail coverage

\\
\,,'
Since 1953, CIA bas operated a mail intercept program ot
. \. ..':
, incoming and outgoing Russian mail and, at various times, other

selected mail at Ken..'ledy Airport in Iiew York City. T'nis prog:rem
is now don:ant :Pending decision on hllether to continue or to
abolish it.
'h\~
,,
"Q0427
'
"
f
I' ~,
./,.
I .....
"
CQ ~J P I D IS l~ 'f I A L
8 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. W. E. Colby

Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee
FROM Director, National Estimates
SUBJECT Comments on Proposed DCI Statement (Hunt Case)
Since you are aware that I have no facts bearing on the case, I
..take it that you asked fqr comIl1ent from the following point of view:
will the proposed statement be well received by the committee?
The main questions in the committee's mind will be: Did CIA
cooperate Wittingly in activities which were both illegal and outside its
charter? Or did it only respond supinely to higher authority even though
it had some reason for suspecting illegal conduct?
Tactically, I think there would be advantage in coming to grips

fran~dy with these questions in the statement itself. The text in its
present form could be taken as a minimum factual response which doesn't
quite get at the heart of tl}e matter. I think it preferable, in the interest
Of the Agency's reputation on the Hill, to proceed to candor directly rather
than to be drawn to it by subsequent questioning.
Key follow-up questions which can be anticipated would include

,the following:
• contact?
Why is there no record of the initial Ehrlichman-Cushman
If Cushman recorded the conversation with Hunt, was he not already

suspicious of the latter's purpose and why didn't he ask? At a
minimum, could he not have inqUired whether "the individual whose
ideology we aren't entirely sure of" was an American citizen?
00428 ..
...... T T
t.; V 1"1 r J. U .w A •
. .
e6 U F IDE ~l T fA Is
When Cushman told Ehrlichman on 27 August 1971 that -CIA was

suspending support to Hunt. was it only on the ground that the
latter had become "too demanding"?
Why was the personality study on Ellsberg provided when it

was obvious that this action transgressed the Agency's charter?
Obviou sly most questions which will be raised can only be answered
by Helms and Cushman persona·Hy. Nevertheless, I think the DCI would be
well advised to provide a candid evaluation of these proceedings in his initial
statement. To do SQ voluntarily would make m::>re persuasive the assurances
the Committee will want that nothing of the sort will be done under his
direction of the Agency.
. 00429
- 2 -
COr;QPIBENTIA I
I .
-f ,.t-L-~ ft~~/ !./
..."
"
. ~.
. • -. f'1 _.,. 1
,1.-1 ~.!- ..!..... ,:......._:.: ~

j~~i:~' II ,I f •• ...: •••• -1
Of·,"
-.,,: ..
-:,
!.,:_.,
...
MEMORANDUM FOR ALL CIA EMPLOYEES
'\
1. Recent press reports implicate CIA in certain Z'i'" j

activities allegedly committed in the United States. vVithout going
into the details of these allegations p I can assure you that I intend
to cooperate fully with the various law enforcement and Congressional
investigations of these matters.
2. All CIA employees should understand my attitude toward
matters of this sort. I shall do everything in my power to confine
CIA activities to those whi.ch fall within the strictest interpretation
of its legislative charter. I take this position because I am determined

,
that the law shall be res'pected and because this is the best way to
foster the legitimate and necessary contributions we in CIA can make
to the national security of the United States.
3. I am taking several actions to implement this objective:
I have ordered all the senior operating officials of
this Agency to report to me immediately on any
activities now going on. or that have gone on in the
past. which might be construed by reasonable people
to be outside the legislative charter of this Agency.
00430
CIA nF.PBFtH~':k \J~F OO I .y
eM FN'f'DHPlAL. USE Oliff y
..
I hereby order every person presently employed by
CIA to report to me directly on any such activities
of which he has knowledge. I invite all ex-employees
to do the same. Anyone who has such information shall
call my secretary (extension 6363) and say that he wishes
to talk to me about "questionable CIA activities".
I intend to name a highly respected person from outside
the Government to review. investigate. and prepare
reports for me on any apparent violations of the CIA
legislative charter which are brought to his attention
or may be uncovered on his own initiative. I shall give
this person complete and unrestricted access to all
records and J:>ersons in the Agency.
4. To insure that Agency activities are proper in the future. I
hereby promulgate the following standing order for all CIA employees:
Any CIA employee who believes that he has
received instructions which in any way appear
inconsistent with the CIA legislative charter shall
inform the Director of Central Intelligence immediately.
James R. Schlesinger
Director
00431
Retirement Infonnation - E. Howard Hunt
1. Date of retirement: 30 April 1970
2. System: CIA Retirement and Disability System
3. Grade and salary at time of retirement: GS-1S, Step 8· - $28,226
4. Creditable civilian service used in computing annuity:

17 May 1948 to 8 June 1948 - Economic Cooperation Administration
9 June 1948 to 19 February 1949 - State (ECA)
8 November 1949 to 30 April 1970 - CIA
S. Annuity:
At retirement - $1,020 per month

At present - $1,181 per month 6~hich includes cost-of-living
increases since date of retire~ent)
6. At the tLl1e of retirement ~fr. Hunt did not elect survivorship benefits.
This meant that up0fol his d~ath, his wife '"''QuId not dra\v a survivorship
a~lUity. By letter of 5 April 1971 he raised the question of changing
his election but \vas· infonned by the General Counsel on 6 May 1971 that
thiscouid not be done. By letter cIated 5 lo-fay 1972 Mr. Hunt asked Mr.
Houston.to raise with the Director the possibility of being recalled to

duty for a short period of time, after which he could retire again and
elect survivorship benefits. By letter of 16 ~fay 1972 Mr. Houston advised
Mr. Hunt that to call him back to duty solely for the purpose of permitting
him to change survivorship benefits would be in violation of the spirit of
the CIA Retirement Act.
00432
-'·:-~:;£';?ii~f.~ ." . ,
": ',.:-.:'. ';": .
'. ~ .
Sl;:NDER. WiLl. CHECK CLASSIFICATION TOP AND BOTTOM
UNCLASSIFIED I I CONFIDENTIAL I SECRET

TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE INIT}ALs
..
S7L ",
1
Inspector General ~/ ~ ~ /J;? .. ; . ,
.. ' ... .
2
,- V . ,.,:,,:-h;:~:~}:: .
..
3 :..
J " ••
..... ~'-; ..
•
S
6 l
a
ACTION DIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY t
'. APPROVAl DISPATCH RECOMMENDATION 1tI....
COMt.tENT fILE RETURN
COHCURRcNCE INFORMATION SIGNATURE
.. ~.
Remarks:
. Attached in chronological order is that

which MAG has produced and papers related
".~ .. ' .. to Management's reac_';)u thereto on !trAG's
concern re domestic activities. It is provided
for YO'ur review and -comment to Mr. Colby.
This is our file copy and! would hope it could . " ..
,.
be retrieved if required. .... ~>. ·;·~i:~
. ~...
. .
/'7 , ":. . . 1
FOLD HERE :r6~!tETURN TO SENDER
.' FROM: NAME. AOODf!!i; ANO PHONE: NO. 01lTE
../.::;.':1-" •
• alES/CIA MC/Ben Evans
I
r II IBMav73
I UNCLASSfFIED I oCOi'iFIDL:' llhLo. SECRET
(40) '.
..'
I
./ . '. .- .
. ,...
'-
• J
. •• "
' .. ....- .
.....
~ -
~
~ " "
,--"._.. ..... _- . .. .. _.~.--
.' .1
., '::~ '::_.,£.;,.-':-. .; - 't..",.~. _.~ . .4 ._
..
-
'
..-.. r ..' _._
;.
•.
.
_
40 . . ·~ •
( ·,0:
0.
0 .0
~
~
DIARY NOTES
Executive Dir~':tor-comPtroller~ 4 january 1972
1. I met with the outgoing and Incoming MAG Cochairmen. We

discussed a number of topics but concentrated particularly on their
two most recent memoranda concerning domestic activities. I ex-
pressed slight irritation with their second memorandum, which is a
shotgun approach to the problem, and asked them to be specific if
they have anything in mind. I said I understand they have heard that
we sent a surveillance team to the Democratic National Convention.
Mr.1 . Isaid that·he made this statement because an Office
of Security employee reported in his presence that he personally was
a member of a team which went to the Convention.' (I subsequently
raised this with Howard Osborn, who after investigating reported back
that the Secret Service asked us for two technicians during the Demo-
cratic National Convention. These technicians were formally detailed
to the Sec.ret Service and went to Chicago. where they did RF monitor-
ing under the supervision of the Secret Service. The Secret Service
apparently calls RF monitoring flaudio surveiliance, " and it seems that,
during the discussion which took place at the Senior Seminar, those who
heard this assumed that "surveillance" meant actual surveillance of the
candidates, when actually the meeting rooms were being checked to
ensure they had not been bugged. I have reported all this to the Director
and shall discuss it with MAG when I have dinner with them on 11 January. )
.,,_........- . _ - - _ . _ .... - .¥._.' - - - .......- - - . _ . . - ._ .._ -
.....
00434.
-
.. atM:. cal * ?,,::? t. ! t
23 December 1971
MEMORANDUM FOR: The Executive Director-Comptroller

SUBJECT : CIA's Domestic Activities
REFERENCE . MAG Memoranda on same subject dated
March 1971 and November 1971
As requested; MAG met with the DDP on 21 December and

discussed with him the referenced memoranda on CIA's covert
domestic activities. Our exchange consisted primarily of
the DDP responding to the MAG memoranda as they related ,to
activities of the Clandestine Service alone. The DDP made
it clear that he spoke only for his Service. Since MAG's
initial concern over covert domestic activities extended to,
while not being restricted to, the Clandestine Service.,
it recommends that the referenced memoranda be also brought
to the attention of appropriate senior officials in other
Agency components.
The Management Advisory Group
EYES 00435
----""!......
U U.'~lLA::»lrU:'u \. U USE OHlY
'~"'--~
SUSPECT: (Optional I
f--
FROM: EXTENSION NO.
DDP DATE
22 Dec 71
TO: (Officer designatio", room number, and. DATE
building) OFflCER"S COM~~~ to show from who...
INITIALS to whC<'lt. a ine ccron mn alter each commentl
RECEIVED FORWARDED
)
1.
-I. / BY HAND
Executive Director
(
2.
3.
rj/ ..
4.
5.
/
6.
.
7.
.
8. .-
, ,
.
9. ..
10.
.
11.
..' A·.:
: .
12.
. .
13.
-14.
-
'-
00436
.
FORM
3-62 E1 ce~IFIBENTIAl o WTERHAl
USE ONLY o UNClASSifiED
~,
!
I
j
Co.
..
1
./
!,
I 21 December 1971
MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Comptroller
SUBJECT: Meeting with tvLAG Group
1. I met with the MAG group this morning for little over
an hour, and I set forth as candidly as possible those counter-
intelligence and counterespionage responsibilities of ours overseas
which make it mandatory for us occasionally to take an interest in
American citizens overseas. I explained the requirements placed
.j on us by the Department of Justice for overseas checks, and also
I the fact that our normal overseas operations against Soviets and
I
.I others SOUle times produce leads to Americans in conspiratorial
I
contact with our Communist targets •
.11
.
i
• 2. I was asked about our having sent Agency representatives
.i
to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in 1968 and I
1i
explained that I never hearl.J. of such a thing and did not believe it.
I pointed out that, as they knew, the press had reported fully on the
Agency participation at the beginning of the sky marshalling program
and I assumed they saw nothing wrong with this~ They agreed. I
also pointed out that, at President Kennedy's funeral, with scores
of important foreign per.sonalities here, the Agency lent some assistance
to the Secret Service, and here again the group understood that this
was a legitimate function.
3. The group made it clear that their concern was over the
Agency image if the general public were aware that some of our
activities, wherever they took place, were targeted against Blacks.
I said that we did not target a.gainst Americans of any color in this
country, and that the Clandestine Service was color blind when it
came to canying out its overseas Cl respunsibilities and it would
continue to be s 0.
00437
4 •. I agreed that the Director should be asked to speak a
little more fully and clearly on whether we "target against American
. citizens" so that there is no am..biguity.
5. I told the group that we must expect all kinds of irrespon-

sible accusations in the press. such as the one in the January 1972
issue of RAMPARTS magazine in which Bob Kiley and Drex Godfrey,
it is suggested, are still in the employ of CIA working on a· CIA
plan to improve police organizations in this country. I said that this
was palpably false as anyone who knows Kiley and Godfrey would .
understand. The group mentioned Dick Ober's unit and said that
there was a lot of scuttlebutt that the purpose of this unit was to keep
book on Black Power adheren!"&:' I denied this saying that our interest
was as I had explained it previously.
6. I do not know whether this is a fair as swnption, but

Dick Ober's machine program is not handled in the Clandestine Service
and it is possible that someone· is misreading and misinterpreting the
intent of Ober's program from fragmentary bits and pieces that may
be discernible from the handling of the machine program. I do not
state this as a fact because I have not examined it that closely.
7. I told the group that: I had offered to enlighten it candidly

on what we do so that they '·,uld at least have the facts and I said
that I assume you would take it f:rom here~
lJY1~.. ~
Thomas H. Karamessines
Deputy Director for Plans
00438
.. -.. --_._~ ....-._... ,~-'-'.- .. -.~.
'.
lIEMORANDUM FuR: The Director

THROUGH: The Execut~ve Director-COmptroller
SUBJECT: CIA's Domestic Activities
REFERENCE: MAG Memorandum, "CIA's Domestic Activities,"
March 1971
1·. MAG is seriously concerned about possible reper-

cussions which may arise as the result of CIA's covert
. domestic activities. Public revelation that CIA has become
involved in collecting information on U.S. citizens would
likely redound to the Agency"sdiscredit and jeopardize
overall Agency programs.
2. MAG first expressed its concern" about' CIA's covert
domestic activities in a memo for the DCI, transmitted
through.the Executive Director-Comptroller in the Spring
of 1971 (Attachment A). 'MAGfs concern has increased
recently because of such ar1:i.c.1e~ ·as Vic Marchett.i's UPI
interview (Attachment 'B) and the 10 October New York Times
article concerning rupture of FBI-CIA relatiOiiS-· (Attachment
C). Both hint at extremely sensitive Agency involvement in
domest ic act i vities. ·Addit:lonally, 'the DCI. addresses to
the American Society of Newspaper Editors (Attachment D)
and to the CIA Annual Awards ceremony (Attachment E) make
rather categorical denials o:f Agency covert targeting on
U.S. citizens. Agency' employees aware of the various
sensitive operations in question know that there is
qualify"ing language explaining CIA involvement. However,
UAG believes that in the event of an expose,such esoteric
. qualifiers will be lost on the American public and that
there is probably nothing the Agency could say to alleviate
a negative reaction from Congress and the U.S •.public. It
is MAG's fear that ~uch a negative reactioncoul~ seriously
damage our Chngressional relations, effect our.work against
priority foreign targets and have signifi.cant impact on the
viability of CIA. .
"
3. There are indications that the Agency, in responding
to'CE/CI requiremeD:ts, is coJ.lecting information on selected
.•..:: ...
.00439
----.-----_.
. 1
u.s. citizen; both at home and abroad. In operational areas

which are highly sensitive and potentially explosive (e.g.,
domestic radical or racial groups) this Agency must carefully
weigh the needs and pressures for collecting and maintaining
this information against the risk and impact· of revelation
should the operation become compromised or public knowledge.
We therefore urge that all domestic collection and action
programs be severely reviewed so that only those be continued
which are of the highest priority and which absolutely cannot
be undertaken by domestic agencies. CIA should not take on
requirements .of this type by default.
4. Not all of the members of MAG are privy to CIA's
direct or indirect involvement in domestic activities. Those
who are aware probably know only parts of the whole picture.
But our tncreasing concern and our intense interest in
maximizing the Agency's ability to do its proper job, impel
us to bring our serious apprehensions to your attention.
THE MANAGEJdENT ADVISORY GROUP
..
'
"
,
..
.' .
.."
."~ ' ..
2
.,.
........ ;,.: .... ; ; t ·1 ',,7.1
00440
------_. - _ _ .
;' .. • I
,--
.
Attachments B, C, D and E
'
..
. . .
'Attachment d - Vic Marchetti's UPI Interview, from U.S. News
and World Report, 11 October 1971~
..."Fearing..toda.y..that..the .CIA may already have begun
'going against the enemy within '..the...Uni.t.e,d. st.ates as they
may. conc.eive .it.,...-..tha.t..is.,.. .dissident student groups and
civil-rights organizations .... t1
"Because the men of the Agency are superpatriots, he
said, it is only natural for them to view violent protest
and dissidence as a major threat to the nation ... ~he inbred
CIA reaction,. he. said,. would .be..t.o. .launch a clandestine
. operation to infiltrate dissident groups.
That, said Marchetti, may already have started to
happen.
'I don't have very much to go on,' he said. 'Just bits
and pieces that indicate the U.S. intelligence community is
already targeting on groups in this country that they.feer-to
be subversive.
'I know this was being discussed in the halls of the CIA,
and that there were a l't of people who felt this should be
done.' "
Attachment C - New York Times, 10 October, "FBI-CIA Relations: "
. ~'Information generally exchanged .be,t.ween .t.he. FB.I..and the
CIA might concern such subjects as officers of .the .Black .
Panther party traveling overseas ••• and American youngsters
cutting sugar cane in Cuba .. "
Attachment D - DCI Address to the American Society of Newspaper
Editors:
"And may I emphasize at this point that the statute
specifically forbids the Central Intelligence Agency to have
any police, subpoena, or law-enforcement powers, or any
domestic se~urity functions. I can assure you that except
for the normal responsibilities for protecting the physical
security or our own personnel, our facilities, and our
classified information, we do not have any such powers and
function; we have never sought any; we do not exercise any.
In Short, we do not target on American' citizens."
00441
-- --- "-;.' .- --'" ... '.-
.
..... ,
.- , \
... '. 0 •• ;.0
Attachment E - DCI Address to CIA Annual Awards Ceremony:

"1 gave a talk to the American Society of Newspaper
Editors last winter, as you know, and I did it for only one
. purpose. Th~~ was to try and put in the record a few of these
denials that we've all wanted to see put in the pUblic record
for some time. And you can rely on those denials. They're
true, and you can use that as any text that you may need to
demonstrate..t.hat .we'.r.e.. nO.t .in .the drug .tr.aific.. , .and that
we're not..try.ing to do espionage on American citizens in the
Unit-ed States. it
I
1
I
•
j r
I
~
j
oj
I
II
I
00442
, . '.( (
..
..
\
"
."
25 March 1971
I
I
i'
i
,r" .'
.l
.....
THROUGH . ' .. .\.

,.
.,
I .
StmJECT :. CIA Dome~1c Ac-tivltio::; .'
W\G 1s conccrr-.cc1 tha'~ CIA avoid inVQlt"'::roI:'~ ~n tht! cu..,.....i"Ont

cxpooc 01" the <1cm0:.r'do in'tcJ-l1c::uC:l ~ct1vitios of: \;113 A..--cy and
:othel· 'federal Dzenctc3. }Ic b~11ev..:; that t.11,cr~ C,;.-.o CIA
activities ~ir.."l1.m' to tho::::l ~.] m-;o:.~ sCl-::;;:;iny \1:tl.C:1 cou1.c1
coosa great c:;:ib<ll"'raGc~.:;:nt -:;0 tb Jl.~-onr::y t~CCUlJO ~oy cpr..oo.:- to
CJ::cced the' 5co:-yo of t..'hc eL.l\. ChOT~:-. E=cc.D~ ~O~ tllo A;.,7\)~:r'O
.' . statutor:~1' Cr./CI respozwibilltiC::i;l W\.G Ol!~no.....:.J P-r:;:.:rzy
activity which could be const7~d a3. tal·~~~d aG2~t any por-
.. son ~ho enjoya the Pl-<'O"';CC"i;i!)il e/1 tr.:.t US Ccns"'''i tu:~1.Q.I~ --
vhothor or no~ he !''Go1dcs b ~o Un1"~d Stc"~o. Er...cOlJ't..1n
t.'103Q CQ8CaelDorly l"Olnted to n~'l;ioll:ll G~i'ty" roO US
c1t.t~on shouJ4 bo th.o objcc'~ c:? CIA Op::>t-O';;1Cil!l. no 1,"'oclico
thee on occa~ton tho Agency uill Cic1t""Clop f.!::fol"';'"~"i;1cn a'C'O~;j
-j !
I
BOros citiz.cm ·.-lno is Gnz~ot1 ill cct1.vitioG in'1a1caJ. to tim
I' ; intcrost~ o-r. ~ Unit~ c;n·:~:C03. S"..lC."J. inform'~ic:l ch:;'l'''l!l \i.u1cklj
, i l>e tUl":'..cd ove~ to tho pr.:;~~ CS3!1Ciol; oZ &'i·I....~~r(v rc~ ~
I
tber action, e'l,-C!:l ~ S:~ ~a:lO that c~:tiD:m on cccorrtilllly
hos)-Ol·tent-~d C.zc'l:Lcy m:a.y 1;::! o.ol:::d to psri'C;.""'ll\ in 0 ll.til1~d 01>-
erat'Lonal ca~1"~y ovol"3caa. I
tt l-le do not pUl"'iJua SUCt~ a 00''':':-00" <m:J' d.~ ~
and the 'Conr;ress \::il1 co~ i:¥o nO'\iO t..'l~VU <'iouo-ts obou:"1i cm"l"Olo
pUblic I
in f;oV'Crn,::lI::mt... a:'11 1.'.0.:1' ao~~J_y I'v<Ta'1ct cur obll1t7 to per..
tort I those to~1;:~ !)::"·oP:JJ.·~Y c=w:!.~d to CIA..
,......
. c-
'.
. .": . ~ '".": .
•! .. " :"
! ..
".,; '0
t·. ,:'.
:. :.,' .
,
I
..J 00443.~
.--- .
'.
"" .... (
'\. •• .. I
l... LE~lO~ . . i \.NDUM FOR: Deputy Di:l:-ector for Intellizenca

D-eputy Director £01" Plans
Depu'bj' Di:racior far Stt?po:rt
Depu;y Director for Science and Technolo3Y
Hea.da of Independent Officea
(For Distribution to oilice/Divi3icrn Chl-e£

LavelOnly)
SUBJECT
1. From. time to ti..:m..e SQIne of otU" employees express conGeX'D. over

various allegations or :rumors of CI..A.. activitie3 b t.~ United States. Tae
a~..a.ched ~ra.nduznis designed to clarHy +bis subject s.o thataupar-
..r isors can authoritatively :reply to any e:r.oployec3 ind,j.cati",Z 5Uc:h co.ocarn.
!t is 3. staten:le:o.t of. the facts
. 01 the aituation. IT incidents or activitie3 are
rcpor"te W.OJ.~ app.a.a:;: 0 cO.n:!. . c....w.!.t..u.
. d ,. - 't.. t i l l · ~..... {- .. a:::n.en:" fAey S.Q.,:P'..u Q D~ :re-
",.!llS :;p.$. ....' ' •• ' , ,
p·:>:-ted to 3 pprop'ria·ta ,se:nior at..~rity £01" res olution (or coxrection ii un-
au.thorized a.ctivities nrlgbt ha~ o-ccurr~d)•.
Because of the' pos'sible ~en3iti:vit'J offhis description ox roe

2.
Ag-eI1cy' s m.ethodology~ this m"'rnorand'CJ:l:l is not bebg give-n the usual bI'oad
ci'rc.J1ation of the "FYI -- Allegation3 and Answers fJ serie3. Office and
Divi3ion Cbieis are u:rg-ad~r..ovrever~ to usa it to ;'M~o:nn Branch Chiafa so
that its pm""tscan be i:'eadlly.available to supe-:"Vi30:rs to react 'to e.xpres:-
sions of e:rn.plo-/ea C01lca:rn. . '
lSI W. E. C:.)!0Z
1lcl. E. C'olby'
.
EhC<:Uo.ve Di:rector-Cor::n:otroller
At+'-achm..ent
vfEcll
Distr~n:
o DDI
1 Each Other Addressee:
-~ .... ..- ..
~ _--
DDP n/neI/IG' A/DCI {Thuermer}
DDS n!PPB SA VA
DDS~.:;T ONE USIn Secretary
OGC OLC ill OO~44
,
·.
,. \.
~.
( (
'.
:
ALLSG...:'\.TION:
L"l a variety of ways it has been alleged that CIA is wor}dng ....v Hhin
the United States .. with particular attention to.. . e:ctremi3i; groups •
.FACTS~
1. Section 102 of the National Security Ad: of 1947, subpa.ragraph

D3, states, "The Agency shall have no police, subpoena, b.w-emorcement
P owers" or internal security .functions. ".
~
In his speech to the American Society of Newspaper EdHors on

14 April 1971, tha Director stated:
"l can a'ssu=e you that e..~cent for the nOrI::"'...al res-oonsibilities'
~ ~
for protecting the physical security of our own personnel~ our

facilities, and our classified imol'xna.tion, "\ve do not have any
such powers and fuu{;,tions; we have never sought ~ny; we do not
exercise any.. In short, we do not target on American dHzens. 11
In the llirector l s "State of the Agency" speech to employees on

17 September 1971, he said: .
III gave a talk to the Am.eriro?n Society of Newspaper Editors

last winter,. as you k.z{ow~ and I did it for' only ona purpose. That
was to try and put in the record a few of these denials that we've
all wanted to see put in the public record for some time. And
you can rely on those denials. They're true~ and you can use
that as any text that you may need to denlonstrate that we're no~
in the drug tra£.fic~ a.nd that we're not trying to do espionage on
AInerican citizen3 in the "Vnited St3.te3" and we're not tappL.,.g
telephone lines~ andtha.t wetre not doing a. lot of other things
which wetre accused of doing. One of the things that tends to
perpetuate soma of these silly ideas are jokes t.."h.at a::;:,e Ir-ade
about them., pa.rticularly about domestic. espionage. Although
the jo"l-;:es :P..a.ve no ba.sis in fact they nevertheless give us a name
which we donlt deserve. I don l t say tha.t that makes all tr-..at much
difference. but it does m.a.ke some difference,' and this tends to
spill ov~r, so I would like to suggast fr...al: if you r...a.ve it in your
hearts to do so that you speak up when the occasion arises and
try and set the fact::3 straight."
00445
,..
. '
,A't.
.. :' "'.J
\;.., --'.;..:, Ii
;~ '1
..
(
'"
2. From ti.m.e to time some e:mployeea ha. v-e: be~ concern~d thai:
.A8~::J.CY acc:vities mlght: conflict "vith these stat.an::lents. They can ba
?os sur-ed tha.t Ag~cy activlti·as do ZlO~ For clarific3.ti.o.n". some activitiea
w'hlch rn:ay hav9 bean subje-ci: to misunderstanding are listed as follows:
...
a. Doma::ruc Contacts. The DomeatLc Conoct Service
establishes discreet but overt rehtionshipa 1»ifh A:m.e'rican pri-
v-ate citizen,:" co:a:u:nercial,. a~dan::ti.!: a.nd othar organlzation3
and reaident aliens for the pu:rposeg of collecting on a voluntary
ba.sis foreign. intelligen.c~ in£o:t'xr..:a.tion or soliciti.ng their coopera-
tion b a3~:dsti.ng the Agency to perior.n:l its mission overs~s.
Racords ot the iAdivirluab and 02'ganiz.ations coopel"ating with the
Agency are maintainad as a. n,eeessary practical ele.m.e.nt 0.£ thi3.
.
o::"ocesa•
b. Security Investigations.- Security investigations are .c:on-

ductad on p~ospective e::::o:ployees, contraetor31 and con~u1tants... _
a.nd on security problems which arise. These investigations in-
vol'7'~ a wide ral'..ge of investiga.t:i:ve p:rocedures l . inclu.e:lli::1g neighbor-
hood inqniries.1' c::.h.ecks with othe~Goverm:n.entagencies.1' :ravlew of
credit rep<>:rtS I and int~mewa with !orm-er employers and business
2.s3ociates.. This is essential to assm:'e that our De:l:'son..'J.el
.. uossess
s-
a high. degree of pe~sonal_ini:agrit'f, sen33 01' responsibility.. and
comp-ate:n·ce and to protect classified ii"fonr...an.onand sen::sitive in-
telligence sources and methods. The resuJtj-r'g 'files 2.ra held sep'"
a:rat~ly by the Office at" Seeu..-ity and are not IXl::ll'ged wi~'l omer
Agenc.y files... .
c. Fo:rei.gn R-esourca3. On som.e occasions;> foreign citizens

-0£ interest to CIA are contacted and recruited in .P--D:la-rica for wo:r~'
abroa.d. The pu...-pose of this a:etivity is ent:b.·~ly restricted to the
Agency's foreign bperations. .
d. Recrui!=necl. CI..<\ :recruit-era :maintain a wid'e variety of

contacts within the United States, assisting indiv-iduals interested
in ern:ploy:rn.~n.t. ..vith Cr..<\. to 1~a.:rn more about it and to joL, its em-
ployee iorce.
e. Contractinq. b the course of CIA business and op~ration3~

a nurnber or C04~racts for p:rocurement~ resea.::.-ch, or analysig al"a
made with a va.ri.ety of U.S. com.pa.nies and individU3.1s.. This in no
',"lay constitute!! opera.ti~ns in the U.S. but ra.ther secures t-~e as::list-
ance o! thes~ groups i::::l carryi.""'lg out the Gl.~ mission ag3.i:ast iO"l"eign
t:lrgets.
-2-
00446
r
~.
.; .. ''''~:1
.'; ,,...,..
\~... '. 4 ~
(
.., '!' . ., 1..l.
(... .'~ '.~ I
\,~., •
,I,
~
',"
: • ..:0 j
0, • t.··. -, ".
i~ Operati:)us. The 1967 Kat.ze~bach Com....--n.ittee report ....v as

app:::oved by ilia Directo-r in :r./I.a.rch 1967 a.nd is biJ:\l"l;jlg on any of
our J:'ab.:Hons with .A.m.arican. organizations today. It specifically
pl"oHbits covert f h ancUl assistance or support.. direct or L71clirect,
to any U. S. educational or pri.,iate "Voluntary organization. Any
re.l1ltlons
1_ 0 hi'p or opera~on
~
tue .fi.gency .nas
L't." , °t' an A
wnn '
mer1.can org3:m.- 0
zatlon :must be and is within these guidelin.es.
g. Details 01' Loans. On rare occasions" details of technically

qua1i8 ed CLi\. pe1"50nnel, technical advice, or loans of CIA equip-
ment: have been mada available to ollier U .. S. agencies at their
request to assis! thezn to carry out their responaibilities. An.
e~m.ple i:'3 the skym.arshal prog:ra.m., in which. SOIne CIA persor..nel
ware ten:tporarily detailed to fu5 FAA in order to assist in a rapid
in.i~.-ation of tha·t progra.:m. Such personnel and equipment are under
the opa::oationa.l control of the receiving agency. Assistance of this
natu:re in no way c011stito.tes an assumption of respousibilit"f or
au.thority by CIA for the progra."T.l..o.
. .
h.. Counterln±elliqence and. Drugs. To carry out its responsi-
bilities lor counterint-alligence> CIA i3 inte:rested in the activities
of fo:reign :nations or intelligence serne·es aimed 3.1: the U. S. To
·1:..~e extent that these activities lie oUbide the U. S. > including activ-
ities ai.m~ at the U.S. ut:i1i.zing U •. S. citizens or others, they fall
within CIA's :reapo:n.si1>i1it:ie3~ Responsibility for coverage 01 the
activities within the U.S. lies with the FBI; as an inte:rnal security
function. CIAI s responsibility and authority are limited to the foreign
intelligence aspect of the proble:m., and any action of a law enforce-
Inent or internal security nature lies "vith the FBI or local police
forces. (CIAl s assistanc-a t-othe U·.. S.. Gov.em.ment programagajngt;
na.rcotics and drugs is handled in the sa.m.e £.asbion. )
i. Operational Supporf.· To support CL-\. operaQ,on5"arrange:-·

rnents are made with variou5 U. S .. busmess or other entities to
pl"ovida cover or other support for CL4.. personnel or activities
abroad. This can inclt.::.da propriel:a:riesiormed or controlled by
erA.. While these rt:J.A.y e..-cl.st wi!:hin the U .. S.. , their purpose is to .
conduct or snpporl operation3 abroad.
j. Defectors. As provided by la.w~~.r:01 o<5~:.5'i~~~i resoettles

in the U. S. defectors and othe:r foreign individuals of operational
interest. T:h..is rese'!:t1ernen'l: :rn.ay involve a new identity, relocation,
employment" etc. Alj:.hough this 'activity t~k9S place in this country"
its pu:::-pose is the support of operations abroad.
....
-:J- 00447'
i'-I', J:'-:""~
• \. , ....·'~~IFiFD ~ C "lDE;-tTIAL'1 l S};CHET
I(' .-;-., . . OFFiCIAL ROUTli\jG SL1P
I lit· ...- ...
II'oro• NAME' ;'NO ADOR'::SS DATE INITIALS

,
i~
L r.:1AG Co-Chairmen
j 2
I
'I
3
I .~
I ,-
j 5
I
6
1 DIRECT REPLY
I ACTION pa~?ARE REPlY
I A?P;lOV.\L DISPATCH RECOMMENDATION
CO:rlMENT FILE RETURN
I CONCU!HEI'lC~ INFQ;V,I.\TI 0 H SIGIUTURE
t ReJDarks: I
I
I For MAG review and return. Please

I
i
1
" -
) do not reproduce.
I
I
'" I
I
-j
ii '
.' I
'j
!
FOLD HE:RE TO P. ,-~ ..,'"' ...... ~~
1 FROM: HAM E. ADDRESS AH ATE
it- '0/ Executive Directo IMrlv"': i2
• UNCLASSIFIED I I CONFIDENTIAL I SECRET

(40)
f(),V~ prtvio1Ji editions
110.
1-67 237 US!
00448
'.,.• .I
(---r---------'-c-
l
,
!------.....
~ ....Z:!../J ~~ .}~
J)~put:' 01 "r'9ctor i':J'~ Ini:~lli.~enc.e

.c-~?uty Diz-'::ctor fo'?: ?1.:l:l3
D.1pr.lty Di~~ctvt' ior SU?'po~t
.Deputy Dir~c'::)r for Sci~ncd a.nd ~echnoi.og7
G~ner31 COlln.::al.
I:npacto-r General
AS5ist3.nt to th3 Director
SU3JSCT Alleg::dion of Agency Iuvohement in the U. s.
1.The ~1anagemetltAdvisory Group. ~oog other3,. has'

reporl~d on ilia concorns of some arn?loy~e3 tbat the Agency is 7..11-
nerable to the charge of having a:o. operational inter~at in U. S. citizen3
or ol"za::dzati6ns in viohtion of tha National Secm-ity _t\cl. Ar.ach.ed
is my b033t ~d.er3t:3.ndiz::.g of the :£acts. l! H is in 2:rl"Or oX'm(:omplete,
I ask that you let D::l..e know orally or in writing..' .
2. I l:ll'!.ve d-~fted th~ attached with hvo pU'l"pO~e3 inmL'td: First,

~z a basi.:> !o-r' some ~,?-a ot issua.nc3 t..'-lat '.i7ould ad..., be the cOrn:r.:l3.nd.
li:!.e and senior sup~l"viao:rs of policy and fa.e;:;; a:;.d.~ s\:n::o::ld, a5 a iut:.lre
i~sua 01 IlYil -- All.E"gai:ions and .i\.::>.s·~e~3.\ I ' I look for-Tlard to your
comment in ilia not-too-disi:x:lt futur~ be.fo:.--e it is :fo.:~,''''lly disJ;ribut~d.
\'T. EO' Colby

E:{ecunva Dir·ector- Co..r..ptrolle:r
.:;\'tAcn...?em
v, ~<:.Jn.·/.oEvan.s D
Di.st~ibution:
O-DDI
1 - Each other addressee ~Q~ (=-\ ~L:'" ~ ~
'.
IlJ
v· - 2;:Di.r
,-<V\~).. o...v-~
1 - ER
~ ~.~....,.....c.. c:\. " "'- ~", II- ~
c~ ~
'\V -.r..,-..,...;
~\.V\~y'-\ \~\r'
..... ...
00449
' ~
: •. ~ •.••• - '--. "- -I
(
-
:;.~ 1'1
i·i.b.rei-! 1972
.r\ .L.a "LE G:\ "1" 101'1:
L:. a "'13.=iety of W3.Y3 it ha3 been all.e,gcd that C:L.<\ is wo.rldng ...vi~hin t}le
·LJ~"'.it-ed States l with pa!'ticl.lla!' attention to ~xt:::'ami5t grOU?3. A :;:-acent
!l:{a~ple ""/as in the Quicksilver Times of 20 Ja:auary 1972 (attached)".:.
F.i\CTS:
1. Section 102 oi tha National Security Act of 1947, 3ubpa.:ragra;?!l D3)

states, "Th'a Agency shall have no police. subpoena, law-emorcement
powers) or interr.al·secFity functions."
In his speech to the American Soci.ety of Nawspaper Editors on 14 April

1971, the Director stated:
"I can as.3U:i:'e you that except for the normal reBpon3ibi1it~es
for protecting the physical secu:dty of our own pe:r:3onnel, our
. facilities. and our classified in.for:rn.ation, we do not have any such
powers and functions; we nava never sought any; we do not exerci3e
any. L"1 short~ we do not targe" on American citizens. n
L'l. the Director's HState of tha Agencyll Spaecl1 toe:nployee9 on 17 Sep-

te'mber 1971; he daid:
III gave a talk to the 1\rnerican Society of Newspaper Editors

la.st .vinter. as you know; and r did it for only one purpose. Tha.t
was to try and put in th-a record a few 01 these denials that we've
all wanted to see put in the public record for SOIne ti.>ne. And you
can :rely on those denials. They're true. and you can use that as
any te:(t that you may need todernonstrate that we're not in the drug
t:-ai£:c, and thatwe'xe not trying to do espionage on Ame::-ican citi-.
zens i::l the United States) am! we're not tapping telephone lines,
c:n~d that ..... ,elre no!: doing a lot of other tning3 which we're accused
of doing.. One of the things that tends to perpetuate some of th'ese
:::CO~A:;:VfE.NT: The two gentlemen cited ar~ lormer CL.:\ eTIlployees.

~'T.:)i~:-ter th~y" nor the organizations with "'/bieh they ar:;: cU:!"l"e:ntly <:!.asociated
=:':1v:~ any operational c·:nmection with the ...' \:;.ency.
'.00450
(, r
(
I
ti;'~~y :'C~i.:2.':; ;:~re jc:(~.,; t:l<l.t c.~~'L: :-:'~:tC:;:; c~:::'C1\.:i: th.;;::"n, P::''t·t:ict~l~.l:;::lr a:J0~:t
0.v',1.1c.:;ric c5pi':H-:a:;~. AlthI.Y'-lg:.. . ~::~.::: jO~(c:3 h,W<:l ~1.0 0;:.5:3 ::1 fc:.ct't::ey
;:~'~\"I.'::';:h~tcss gi.v~ US a na",.~ w:'.lci.: . . ; ;2 e.onlt (L::=~(;~'Vi~b I Go::. ;: 3.E!.j'
t
~;~;::..~ ti~,,~;: Ina.'r;,.:;s .:dl tha';; l-:-:'UC'h cii.:L.:.::-<-:l"'. C2, b'-lt i:; c.oe:; r:'1.Z:.k.::: so:,:"e
Gl.aen:~:lce,
.. _. -,-
and-tens "
tendS to 5?1_,- - "VO~':'Cl
'11 0\'0::', 50 1 " "~1~,C::
. to suggest
~ -
t t. l~t l~ YOl~ nave l~ In your flc::"c:r-l:S eCl no so tnat: you speaK up \'.f~.e.l
.. • J. • , . '" . "'l .I .........
th0 ccc2_sion arises and try a;:1o. 50: the fa,cts straight. II
2. From. time to time some e:"!:lp::'oy<::'::3 ha.ve been. cor.c.;:;rneci that

A(Y
-='
..~7".cvJactivities rniQht conflict with t:le i(atio::lal Secu:::-it vJ Act ana tele
. . . . . . .
Agencyl;;; staternents. They can be a5~urecl that Agency activities do ::.ot.

Fo:;; clarification, som,~ activities which may aave been subject to rnis-
understar,ding are listed as follows:
a) Security Inve stigatior:s _ Security ip.vc; stigations are conducted

on prospectiv,e err..ployees, con::-actors, and consultants. They in-
volve neighborhood checks on the background of these individ\lalsb
This is essential to rneet t~e secu:-ity requirements of the Agency.
The resulting inform.ation is held. in separate security office files
and not merge.d in other Agency files.
b) Do~estic Contacts. o~ 2.:'. oy<::rt basis the· DOrl'lestic Cor::cact

S c.~- ._~ .....
.. Vl\.;C ~c..~.:...:> v~""'':':''s
-,.-.,-1-
0
"'.
.1.::> .. 1. to Am~y.:c1-
,Co"'-.1. <:.~ .. -o~'6i,.rat~
.:. ~.- ~e c=';-':ze""s
.l.~':' L:;r~'"
.1..".1. ... ::>" a.
.I. • • ... ' o:.~.=.
-no' L.,.~r
o:;:ganizations, soliciting trans:nission to the' Govern:::nent of inrorr.:"'.a-
tion they have learned abroad b The purpose and contei:-.t of the infor-
mation are restricted ,to.for'eign intelligence, i. e." intelligence on
developments abroad. The records or the firms and individuals as
sources are maintained as a purely practical element of this collec-
tion process.
c) Foreign Resources. A va~-iety of foreign citizens of in.terest

to CIA visit or on occasion resid.e in .-\merica. Occasionally they are
contacted and :;:-ecrui~ed for ,vork abroad in th-::: course of travels to
tn..:}:.. . honeland or for contim:.ing collaboration with the Agency in
their hom.eland 2.iter their return fro:n the U. S~ Th~ .purpose of this
c.ctivity is entirely restricted to the collection of foreign intelligence.
d) Recrait:-:::lent. CIA recruiters maintain a wici12: "'·'.:.,,-iety of con-

ta.cts wit"nin the U~ited State s end..::avori:l.g to assist individuals inter-
ested ir.. er.1.ployment with CL<\ to le<::..:::-n more about it and to join. its
erc.. ployce force.
-2-
00451.
-
-
(
· . In tne CClU_~3e oi CL\ bU3i.::F~ 3:.3 ~mdO?~~·ar:ion3;>
io~ ?:.-ocur-:::rn~.nt,
or ana.ly;:;i3 a=e :::e3ea:rc~,
.........1_'=
_.-..i. . . . _.:~.,
'·I",~."\
":'\
.:- "!}' ....
y.~_
:.."' . ' 0-:.• D • .~.
·t-l. :...~; :"' coy"'lo"'\7"'l·:'Il·~~;.a.3
r-t~",,;,.,."
..!. ~ ..... :.:. '1:1 no
~ •• .::-'a........ _ a"l"\· l
z:... ~-n~~ •• ;~n:\13
~~.,",':'I._""""""""
V';2Y ·~::~:>n..:Jtitt:ti:e3 .o~~a.tion3 1::1. !.be U. S. but :rn.t!l~:: secu::.e3 tha Ll';:li:;t-
:''..7\:~ 0-' the3~ 5p·CU?3 in ca:c:::-yi:!:s ou.t t!H~ CIA rni.33ion o£ for~ign i:lt:~l-
i) O?e~a:i:lon3.
The i961 I<atzenbach Comz:nittea report W3.3
~ t . 1\ (
~. • • 9' 7
.~ • .....13 ,.
..:j
.~.??.l·O".l~.... oy Ion·;:: ~Yl=f"~C o:r 1::1. .l.;J,arcb. 1. 0 ana .1.
Ol=ulng on a~y OJ:~ ou:r
1".':}bHo.n3 with Amal"ica:n o:ganizatim::..a tcda.y. It specifically pronibit3
c'::)':/eJ:t iinaZl.Cial ;)'s3i3ta..nc~ or su.?po:rz , direct. OA' indlz-ect, to anY' U. 3.
ec~ca:i;ional or prlyat.e yolunt.?:l"Y o:::.-ganization. A-::l'f relationship OJ:
.'
ope'i·.::tuon io' r. • •.• !l'
.tli!: -,'g~ncy cas WHn a':l ; .r:lc2"lca:n Ol"ga~u2a.~on mU3
..... t .oa ana '\
is ·withb these guid~li:l.es.
~
g) Detillg 0:;:- Loan3. On rare occasion3~ details of technkally .
qualified CIA pe"1"3on..cel or loans oi CL~ equipm.em have bean. r.::lade to
otne-r U. S. agencies to a;il3ist i::l. the ca.:r:rying out of L~eir resp.on::libili-
tie3~ An e~:J.plple is the skyn::.arshal progJ:aln to which soma CL-\
perso!l.:l.el were deta.iled in ordel" to aS3ist in a. rapid initiation' of t1-...ai: ..
program. A~si3tan.ce of this natuxe in no way constitute9 an a:lsump-
tion. of respor13ibllity or autbority by CL.'\ i.o:: the p:ros:ram·.
h) Counl;erL"'1telli.gence. To carry out its re3ponsibilitie 3 Io:\"'

cO~l~i:~l"i~~l1ig-a~z. CL~ b inta:ra 3t:ed in the activities of ior-ei.;sn na-
.. •
.lon3 0:;: 11l1ooe
• -Go 1"...1.genca
. sar",n,ces
. .l.nau
al.. . . al.~ t'as ... i:!
u. ~Jia .
. , . . "1 . . . "1-,
.:. 0 1..1.8 eX4ep,-c .......a~
.>..
the activities li~ outside tbe' U .. 5,. including activ:ii'iad ahp~d at tb.e
U. S. utilizing U. S. citizan3 or oi:hers, it fall3 witb.in. CL'\ ' 3 respon-
sibilina9.. Re3pOo:3ibUity fer coverage of the a.ctivities wiilib ilie
U.3. lies with t!le FBI, a3
it myolves an i,.ternal secu:dty function.
CIA'E; :respon3ibility and authority are lin:dted to the io:r;~ign ;n!'.;;tlli-
gence a3!lact of tl1.a problem and any action of a law e:llorcez:nent or
internal security !!3.tuxe lies with the FBlor local police forces ..
i) Defecto.t's.. ...!\s provided by law, CLt\. occ<l3iona11y- :t'eaattla8

in. the U. S .. defector;] and othar forei3n l..."""ldividuals of ope:r-3.tlonal
inte .... ast, Thi3 re3ettlement rro...ay i::lyolva their as3'1 ...... p!:ion of a new
id~r'_l:ity, location of employr.:1ent, atc. Although thi3' activity tal<e,s
?lac'~ 11-,. this cou::ltry, its pU:rp03-'3 b the suppo=t of ope-ratiou3 abroad •
..,
.:>. -
00452
-.
...,. - (
.. -
j) Cove::-.. .A9';)' pa~t of CIA 0?dj,'"atiou3 aoroad, a;:rang:~r:"\~i1t:;
~tre l\l,;\d~~ 1..:lit~ a num.be~ of U. 3 . . e1··tcii::'~3 to se:;:-v·~ as the o3t~!l3ibl~
C0::lt:('.:)'J.~d by C:...~) O~ ?=opriZl:~ri~~.:J.. ·:Nhil.~ t:"1:~Y m.;).y e;<i:;t withi::l

t:~9 U. :3.. , t:~eir ~u.rp0:3e i3 to conduct. or supp.jrt ope~ation3 ab~oad•
...~.
""
".00453
: .
\;J.. ...,;.l. .......::-.. ~~ J J~\ .. l...J...o,.~......>
I,
' ..... -.
"
'
e .' 20 J"e.a 1972 (
1 ' ;.. .~
(..::
" -: -'
..... 0.:-
.J
..... j
,. . ~-.
.
-J'
- :-
' , ~
. ;. . ,
... ,
"
," ;. .....:
,')
"
They r.tel: ;;here liith,Hel::!s. Io:c:-e pOlic";;'. Bo·th pel·so.-:nei shifts;l

D l'
I ..../. ..:j\. ., . sho',m around. a:ld taken to the secret ,cited by 'lgen:::r peo?le to boht
!i »01C..2C
I,' i',V""<I' ' training c~~rs. i..at ~as the beginni~g fronts in the US. ~hlstl~e. n~v
of ru:;;ors "ithin the agency that the
CIA ha~ been ,given the go ahead to
int.o W;lS ~ivcn :1. new ::itle ree::
oaking hin head of all intellig
t10ve into d';)::!<lstlc police oDc1'a::10ns. ":md prestl:i\J.l>ly pro..-idinZ hit:: I.i
C.lp\ While everyone clenied it. the t~eory 'le~itin~te interest in intern31
was th:lt the ,CV. was told t.o get the • operations. But such suggestio;,
radicals,
. Tlo:o recent rr:rsl)nn~1 Cha."lgC5
'bittcrly denle.! all a:-dll~'c!'
..'
The,. Central ihtcllige~:::c Agen-
inc:c~scd s?e~ulation. Cne.in~olv~d
cy .:lll;ays insists its r.leR aren't in- ' resignation of Holr.:'s speci31 assis-
Nolvcd in c!om~5tic police work. But in, tant. f.ooer:: Ki l~y". Kiler h·;l.:lc lee! t!,C
Chica~o CIA agents ha~e been Io:orking
stude~t operations through ~~tio~~l
"lith the l'=lH an:1·Tresury, ffi<::n in an Studtnt Associ3tio~ inc~des. He re-
effort to pi';1 the bank bQ~:bin?5 on cently tUnlcd ~!) 35 associate director'
r3,1 i ca 1 grolltl;. of the Police F~u~c~~ion. a new gro~9
H.~rctofure.clnl\destineCIA polico;:.
l~unched ~ith u 530 cillioa Fa~d
nork within t.1t':: US I{a$ centered around Fo~r.•.:i.~t·ic~": . g!·~ln-::-. The r.:·.)ncy is ne:lnt.
counter espionJ.~c ,CffOl·ts ~;.',:"..!_ at~ to be u~\)d t.) !:~r>ro\'e local po I ice .
.5odct KGlLer..; l~il.i.ntains· sC'cret bases The second p~rson'nel shift 'In\f\)lv~d
in :t1!' ::~;tjcr US cities_ "h~ az;~ncy al~j Drexel G::dfn:r; ~:~:o 1::;$ he:1.d ot tEe
h:t!o tr.:tinEr.~~ C,H'~?S in Vi rt:i!1in :!.nd· CIA's Office:: cf Curreat In:..:lli~,:~::c.
th.) CJl"(;!in,a.:._T:.cs~ at-c r:~:L5k·~d as reg- r:~ quit t!J.is hi.r,h r~:;-::.:in~: jo~.• w.-ncl
l:l~~ ~ilit;trr h3s~$.Sp~oks n~~
00454
l~? i:\ the n~rcc:i~s bo..t:"t:t.i.U of th,~
: 1',1 i;1,;',( [;)1' (!tl':, at h·illi::::,;h:q:,V:l. ,J •...:.:;t~ct: Co=.:7:i~siC)i~ a: H~rrtt;b ... !r~~
T~o r0~r5 agu CIA e~?lor~es ~er~ P:L. Tht:' cO::':;:t$51o~ ~~ ..\:;(·t:~~!" :\~:...
r.p.~ol·:'"i -'::'! 'o.L~;'\. r:~·:=~)~r~ of th(~ rhi.C":1~~':) _. ••• .' •• : .\., ~.: 1 ..... _ - 1
•• _.. - .... 0', : _ .. _.......
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
East Asia Division Placing Agents in Leftist Milieu -

Cleared with FBI
Central Cover Staff Statistics on Alias Documentation and

Other Cover Support
European Division Research on Vesco Case
Soviet Bloc Division Relations with FBI and Local Police
NARCOG Support to Law Enforcement Agencies

Including Information on American Citizens
Division D International Telephone Links
Foreign Intelligence Security and Exchange Commission and

Staff Vesco Case
Counterintelligence Agency Funds Made Available to FBI

Staff
..' Vesco Case
t- Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff
",MHCHAOS
CI/Police Group· International Police Academy
Foreign Resources Locations, Recruitments, Use Alias

Division Documents
00455
-
...-
.
----_ -....---. .. . . '_ ...
...
'\. . ~
..
-~ _-~.-~.- "'-
- St:NC-i;;,.' "";!':'i.~ dltco{ ~,-'r,.§SIF'~
-_._~~._- ..c . ., ....
- "-""
'-):-- . . r-.D
-- .,-_._-----_.~_._
l·:-OT·r·:.~v1
..
... ,' _-
~=:r' -L.,ci.~~;lf-i~~l=:"1~~~2t . IIn::--- i'\ l '----'--' _._----
:.-.~-_. __ .._-- .H.~ UliI.1
-~ Hf:'~;T
--
-- ------
--
r':
OFFICIAL ROCTI\"G SLIP
~ --Mr. N;:: :::~O~~E~Ol;y·+~O~E~~::~~

2 -;- /~
3
--
l l..? --
4 B Y H A N D
5
- --_.
6

COMMENT fiLE RETURN
CONCURRENCE INFORMATION SIGNATURE
Remarks: ..
00456
FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE NO. I DATE
Walter Elde
,......, r:''-,o;;
,H:~_- ~;:~~.I
r-... :-",.• ~-::;. :',-:1 .
I Jun
1973
I UNCLA~~,;_···n.!
•- •
r.;" i"
.
.;~F;li}!~/II;r,~:~-
'. - .,' .;f
~ t~ ~1I I SECHET
Use M~~,UM,ta I , (4C
rOAM NO.
1-0 237 V¢P lilla Ii ¥ ':1IF. • • - -
--
" .
"
" '
\' J , •• 1 •• ~ _.. ... _ ~
~.~ -."~. r ! . : .. ~
c. . ,,~:... '- _. _Il
I June 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. William E. Colby
SUBJECT: Special Activities
1. Following our recent conversation, I have

searched my memory and Mr. McCone's files for examples
of activities which to hostile observers or to someone
without complete knowledge and with a special kind of
motivation could be interpreted as examples of activities
exceeding CIA's charter.
2. First, as we discussed, on 7 March 1962,

DCI McCone, under pressure from Attorney General Robert
F. Kennedy, agreed to tap the telephones of columnists
Robert S. Allen and Paul Scott in an effort to identify
their sources for classified information which was appear-
ing in their columns. Because ~he primary source appeared
to be in the Department of Defense, McCone ordered me
personally to brief General Joe Carroll, Director of DIA,
orally, which I did. I understand more complete information
on this operation is available from the Director of Security.
I, personally, managed to avoid gaining any knowledge of
what precise actions were taken, what information was gained,
what was done with it, and when the operation was terminated.
3. \
- ~fl.....,c,:,··'
torts W.".L...r---- 00457
,-
" !
'.' .F
t '-- .-
r
l.: ;; L t;."
4. Although certain activities never got beyond

the planning stage, there are, I believe, three examples
of such planning which could be subject to misinterpretation.
One involved chemical warfare 0 erations againstl I
A second involved
aram1 1 ary s r1 e aga1ns
Outside the United ta es overnmen,
1sen ower was briefed on such planning. A third, which
assumes a new significance today, involved a proposal by
Angleton and Helms for a greatly increased intelligence
collection effort against foreign installations in this
country. This planning also involved a scheme for selected
00458
1" ••
>, .
.
t :.1:•.. ~. ~ ~ .. ; i. j.c ~ ,; l ,~,. J ii J
-l-!
.....,_..~_
D,_f.·.~,,;;;~.,.~r~
b.,_i
exposure of KGB activities and counteractions against the

Soviet intelligence service; The reasons are still unclear
to me as to why the FBI chose to brief the PFIAB to the
effect that CIA was planning to wiretap extensively and
indiscriminately in this country, to greatly increase
the Agency representation in the Moscow Embassy, and
generally to use KGB-type tactics, also extensively and
indiscriminately. This led to a heated exchange between
DCI McCone and Mr. Belmont of the FBI, one such meeting
taking place in the presence of the Attorney General.
It is clear that the FBI was opposed to any such proposal
then, as now, and the plan never went forward.
5. During the period when Des FitzGerald was in

charge of the Cuban Task Force, DCI McCone's office
learned, quite by accident, that FitzGeraid had secured
the cooperation of several prominent US business firms
in denying economic items to Cuba. There was no question
but that the businessmen were glad to cooperate, but know-
ledge of this operation had to be rather widespread.
6.
connec ~on ~n
tin g 0 f tam e e
";-w;;-:~::-=-,;;---;:;-r==~=;::;---::-;;;---],....-,;:--,---,-=-----..-=-----r...--......"..--=----,-...-:rr:::7r----,.,l
the 303 Committee, it was decided that the offers of
American business could not be accepted, it being neither
a secure way nor an honorable way of doing such business.
This declaration of policy at this time bears on the recent
·ITT hearings, but I am not surprised that McCone has
forgotten thathe helped to set the precedent of refusing
to accept such collaboration between the Agency's operations
and private business.
7. At the direction of Attorney General Robert

Kennedy and with the explicit approval of President Kennedy,
j McCone injected the Agency, and particularly Cord Meyer,
00459
4
into the US labor situation, and particularly to try

to ameliorate the quarrel between George Meany and
Walter Reuther. Cord Meyer steered a very skillful
course in this connection, but the Agency could be
vulnerable to charges that we went behind Meany's back,
or were somehow consorting with Reuther against Meany's
wishes.
8. There are three examples of using Agency

funds which I know to be controversial. One was the
expenditure of money under Project MOSES in securing
the release of Cuban Brigade prisoners. Details of
this operation are best known to Larry Houston, Mike
Miskorsky, George MacManus, and James S~ith. Second,
as you well know, when Lou Conein received his summons
to report to the Joint General Staff Headquarters on
1 November 1963 a large amount of cash went with him.
My impression is that the accounting for this and its
use has never been very frank or complete. Third, at
one of the early Special Group meetings attended by
McCone he took strong exception to proposals to spend
Agency funds to improve the economic viability of West
Berlin, and for an investment program in Mali. His
general position was that such expenditures were not
within the Agency's chkrter, and that he would allow
such spending only on the direct personal request of
the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Defense, or
the White House.
9. I raise these issues of funding because I
remember the Agency's being severely criticized by the
-House Appropriations Subcommittee for having spent $3,000
for stamps in connection with a program to buy tractors
to secure the release of prisoners from Cuba.
10. Under the heading of old business, I know that

anyone who has worked in the Director's office has worried
about the fact that conversations within the offices and
over the telephones were transcribed. During McCone's
1':;&'(" f.-an ~·J-·';R~. ~-_.~~ ~r:-.~tl-:-~r~ ~ff::

/,~:":< i :""c 1 i '. _, " , :: - (I;
_. I.. .' '. ," •. _
-
-
00460
5
tenure, there were microphones in his regular office,

his inner office, his dihing room, his office in East
Building, and his study at his residence on White Haven
Street. I do not know who would be willing to raise such
an issue, but knowledge of such operations tends to
spread, and certainly the Agency is vulnerable on this
score.
11. Also under the heading of old business,
I Shortly after the Cuban missile crisis, there was

L - , _............----.,.-.J
a d1sposition in Washington to reexamine the Bay of Pigs,
and the fact that several Alabama National Air Guard
officers lost their lives in the Bay of Pigs was surfaced
with surprisingly little excitement at the time.
12. During my stint on the 7th floor there was

a special arrangement with the Office of Communications
whereby the Director's office gained access to non-CIA
traffic. This surfaced briefly at one point shortly after
Admiral Rayborn became DCI. He had visited the Signal
Center and removed a copy of a telegram from the Embassy
in the Dominican Republic for Under Secretary George Ball,
Eyes Only. He returned to his office and proceeded to
disCuss this telegram with George Ball who was naturally
quite curious as to how Rayborn knew about it, and also as
to how Rayborn had it in his possession before Ball did.
Ben Read in the Secretary of State's office and I spent
several weeks putting this one to. rest.
13. Finally, DCI McCone, as you and I well know,

operated on a very lofty plane, and I think certain of
his activities could be misunderstood. One example was
his decision in July of 1964 to have Aristotle Onassis and
Maria Callas flown from Rome to Athens on Air Force KC 135.
Their arrival in Athens in this airplane attracted the
attention of the local press and in due course Mr. John
" ;: ;;'A
\J (~
~ .. "".~ .......
( -.,
,. :~ ";,
00461
£US 11..;.:"'l~\--
6
Hightower, Chief of the Associated Press Bureau for

Washington, came to see me to ask about the propriety
of this action.
14. I
15. McCone dealt quite extensively with newsmen

in Washington. In fact, they gave him a gift and a
luncheon when he left Washington, which is perhaps
indicative of the press's relations with him. However,
in the case of the Ross and Wise book, The Invisible
Government, he did try to bring pressure on the publisher
and the authors to change things. They did not change
a comma, and I doubt that this old saw will ever sing
again.
16.
17. The above listing is uneven, but I have a

sinking feeling that discipline has broken down, and that
allegations from any quarter which cast these things in
the wrong light would receive great publicity and attention,
and no amount of denial would ever set the record straight.
If I may be of any assistance in tracking down further
details, I am of course at your disposal, but I would point
'. .... , ..' l .' : • ,01
1 ~~;&,,,b\liY~ ~ ~ '~' tb
00462
,
t..-
; \ \. . -:; ~: ,.. . ~.: 1.- ~ '.~
or :'1 l ~ .A
~<, t { ,.~ t E it- ~
t" \.,. _. :' _ ... .l
L.","-." " 'C,;:\: \.""'-h",
out that I was very much in the position of the

enlisted man who knew that the commissioned officers
were aware of these activities and better able to
judge their propriety and possible impact or misinter-
pretation.
ELDER
-Z I
.... ' . '.. - . ~
~Lb~~\\.lk wJv~§ d~\~ • ti it L

-
00463
~ February 1972
t--
\ r'- .-. '-, -_.
f.--.... "'"' -..., - -\,
_ .f t .f
,. I 0
1 •.. . ,.,:. .- _. -
.1
~ I
~
11DlORANDUM FOR THE RECORD:
In November 1962 Ht'.. ladVised Hr. Lyman

1
i' Kirkpatrick that he had, at one time, been directed by I1r. Richard
Bissell to assume responsibility for a project involving the assass-
ination of Patrice LumYFba, then Premier, Republic of Congo.
I According tol J)oison was to have been t.ga vehicle as he _
made reference to having been instructed to seef~r. Sidney Gottlie~
in order procure the appropriate vehicle.
\
' .
.'
00464
... h .. _... .0_. . . __ .. _ .. ... __ . _ 0 . ...

BALTI1,'r,r.."
·.VI.IJ..../ .. 1~H
t 11 ;;-PIC .t'A...'il
l'7il'S .l.'.""-J_l f
12 APR 1973
The current imbroglio O\'cr the role that" "Shoulo 'we protect df:'mocratic, (or e\"en un~
'1he Central Intell;gens:e Agenc;~: a.rid~ ih~ In;' df:'mocratic) nations from tot"liiai;iln in\·a.
(emational TelepnQnc 'Gnd Teleg,;<ph Co. Slo'n or sUQversion? Should we utilize our-
played (or considered playing) in trying to foreign aid to nourish dc:mocraiic pC)liticaI
block t.he.: el,eciion of Chile-an President AI;', de\'elopment -'.~ as is providtdin the Fraser
]endeh~5 ,its tantalizi~6 and perplexing as-' ,.' Amendment. to' the fo,eign aid ,bill - or
pe'qs': "~\'as the CIA's cash balance sa low' it . should :...·e 'take ~.strictly ha'nds-off ap. J
needt:d a million dollars from lH·T? Did the'proach? ' .
Cr".-\ and ITS·T rl,'ally think they could pull , , ' It as at this point that the '.In·T fr'lcas
off some of the Slunts cont'tmp!uted witrlOul. " comes ,ba,ck ,into focus, and as ile-ological
the word getting out and working ,massively"" shambles' occurs. Lt't us suppose for a' mo-
in favor, of ,Ali,ende? :But underlying this'<',· ·ment ,t~a,tthe Chase ~,1ai1hattan Bank, influ-
brawl are a serie!: cf \Cry difficult que~tion.. ,encedby. the World Council of Churches and
First ofalt, 'what constitutes American, '. ,to blacK:hberat.lOn movements m South Afri· C)t I
o.c. principle, to ~(lY nothing of definition.... ',:. black ~ilitants., c!ecidtd to pro",:ide a conduIt
(public or priyate) inrervention in the, .iiJler.: :., ca, usin'gitS'.business connections to provide
,
~ ~
nal' affairs ,ofpnothersiate?' Obviously,'" arms and other' aid to the re\'olutionaries. . ,
sponsoring jl·renjlution (as-T~ddy'Roosevelf. :: :Would this be, a,"bad" thing? Was it a -. ~
did to break· P~nama loose. from Colombia)' ~ "bad" t,hing, when the CIA, using a business ~L . '7
Isat ('Inc )Jol~, BIJ~ bt.tw",en'sponsoring revo- . ',cov~r. sl!Jpped,'into Santo' Domingo the ' -1-~
:w
lutions and totally e,limilJatin g ,any Ameri- ; ,: . ea ons used to kill the brutal dictator j ru- ,:::4
,can a~ti\'ity outside of tile Cl)ited States;" . 'jl 0.. (1 don't know ow,he feels about it to- ~
1here JS a long line on the spuclrum, a lme day, but In 1901 toe DominIcan stiltesman
, 'lhat gets fu~7.ier and fU2zierthe' funher. \'OU ' . ;Juan Bosch thought that intervention was
go. , ' ',' " . .".,' ' tlie" greatest ,thing since the disco\'CfY of
,Moreover, even doing nothing c'an be c.on~: America.).' ,
stiued as. intervenrion, ,E~yptrs' President" What this comes down to is that intervcn-,
Nasser throught that Secreian' 'Dulles' re'-' . lion is a "good" thing when :iou happen ,to'
fusal to help finance'·the Aswan Da'm Was a" fa\;or the cause invo!\'ed, but is \\'ick!:'d and
form of: ilitern'ntion. and someye'ars 'ago·, ... )m.m.oraL if you disapprove. of the goals. A."
six eonfee·producing lTalions in Latin Ameri-,' . perfectly hu~an resp.Jnse; but hardly one, on'
ca. protestt>d to the OrganJZation of Ameri-' . which sound pubiic policy can be foi1!1ulat-
can States that our re!usal to 'ligcoffee ed.The though, of ,1T8·T losing its Chilean
prices inien'pned in theil' iliiernjf affairs.. assets does"not bring tears to my eyes or
I would argue that th~ very existence o~ , lead me to, wish we still had 2. supply of gun.
the United States as the ,most powerful n,a~ poats in stock. Capitalism. rm IOld, invof\'es
lion in the wo~ldautomatlcallyintervenes'in taking risks. and the corporation may in the
the affairs of {;very other stelle. :\a.sser and end .be reimbursed bY,il federal agency set
the coffee producers \\ere right: Inaction on up to pro\'ide insurar;ce for 'such contingen-
our part can have as great an impact as ac- cies.
tion. To takc a vivid instance, if we had not 1\0, \\'hat hothers me is the whollv ad hoc
shipped military equipmeFll to Britain be- reaction of the Sl:'nilte committee in\'estigat-
, fore Pe3rl Harbor, the war for Europe,~ould, ' ing the matter. We' would be far better'
have been lost. served by Se-n. Church and his colleagues if
~ lf we accept that proposition. the futile they ,spent less time b~lOg outraged'lnd a
argument over whether \Vc should intervene lillIe 'more trying to fomwialc gene rill
. automatically goes by the boards. Then we guidelines, guidelmes which would apply to
,turn to the hard one: To what ends should South America and South Africa. to the juS1
'we (publicly <lnd privately) intervene? . and the unjust alike, ho.ll'c\'Cr defined, .
00465
'0 l;NClASSIFIED '"
O USt: .NAl
ONLY o CONFll_,~T1Al o SECRET
SUBJECT: (Optionol)
.-
E>les= o I(:/~ ----
FROM: tXltN~IU. "lIIO.
})Mwrlj) DA:7 ~ IlJ71

TO: (Officer designotion, room number,. ond DATE
building) OffiCER'S COMMENTS (Number eoch comment to .how from whom
INITIALS to whom. Draw 0 line across column affer each comment.)
REalVED FORWARDED
1. -LG.
~~~t~~
~
2.
V
I---
3.
. 1-Ar ~} "'1 ~
~·~IJ
f--
4. -
V-
~~~ ..
5. --\ a.uJQ1 Ef ec:; ~
~
6. -
1"'kn ",,~\.\ '-"J~
7.
~~.~W ~\ 1) C/wtf
8.
~l ~ \*c.. ol~ <..fJyAV7
~ (C-. l~ lt2.W~3
9. -t.1C.. ~'n.c \ ... ~\:- i'v~h ..
, tA.~ J..
~-k \.1 \: ~~.."I' t-{
10. ~ l.').( ~
l_\,~~~ ~l- l~
~~~ ~.J
11.
~,
~\.l~~ '~
12.
\" ~ VIJ.$ ~ lv.e..
13.
J....o 14 \: ~~ \'),.,\1
~;-('CA.., ~...l- ~ l~
~~i~\ ~1\-C-4.
14.
C~I'~ ,V'U~
"'l..
~~~ ~cl ~~
15. ft LV-.A..~~~
00' 66 ,_..... l ' no\.-\-e~V¥
~t~
~~ ~
....
FORM
3-62 61 0 US~DjT~~~~US 0 SECRET D CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL
D USE ONLY·. D UNClASSIFIED
...." ..;
·
' ..
,
SUBJECT: Robert L. V esc 0
L ·On 31 July 1972©/WHriJ~ascontacted by Mr. Jorden,.

Latin American referent at the NSC. by telephone in order to
determine if@KHERALD]had any information on Vesco. Mr.
Jorden was advised that a check would be made. A file review un-
c,?veredI \
\f/WH".''Jcalled Mr.
Jorden (31 July 1972) and informed him of the tollowing:
a) Vesco was known to us as head of lOS. had re-

cently visited Costa Rica and expressed a desire to settle there.
In addition, it was known that VescoV
\
, b) IQ/WHD7also advised Mr. Jorden that Vesco had
come to the attention0[1 ~ ~nd they were aware that
field, N .J . r~ubsequently
.
NSC was making inquiries . DOUt vesco .
r
he was President of thenternational Control Corporation of Fair-
'6 as advised that the
2'<
...
\
\
f--
I-
3. \
--
-- 1
-\
00467
. .r-------~. ,. -. \. . .
- -=t.:~=~:.: -. .,~.j~a~;J~t;:_==- L_
. ~
'.
1-
I
\.. :.tI
I...
.,I
,
; i
.
\ :
\!
l~
" -
... 00468
-:'" .... -.
.
..;..
. .-
.:. ...... - XL-V, \L. •
-
-2-
00469
-"-
...
-3-
;.
-------
---
00470
. . _.' ..
-- -
'.
i
; -
1
--
0047~
, "
J CS«.r\;"'-'~ \97 J_ _
DATE
CHM..H 3:ERtNIN'"
BRECKINRIDGE-D A ~~,\. 0 t "' ~~Y1:I'

b.::>'" L." "" _ ~ o. \ "'- \: 5 ~", -- \
S\:vJ.., '~rr~V'J L\ \JJ~ (

L ..... ~J. Y\..OvV l~ ~ ..... fo ~~c.{-
", • L' h... L. J:)"'"Do, ~
.C,"" ·~c.~4V"'1 \ I
~ J) ~&.s ~). 1> J) Sci'T' L'"l.l

cl.o ~ .f~..A~~ .
RETURN TO: S'~.;a :

~~ ~I ~,O\.
~ 1v--~, ~~
00472 Ii
2 1 AUG 1973
~~~MOR~~DuM FOR: Director of Central IntelliGence
FROM Inspector General
SUBJECT Use and Control of Disgllise £nd Ali?.s Documents
1. ~~e attached report resulted from our general inquiries

into '-latergate-related issues and contains recommendations in
paragraph 9 for your approval.
Background:
2. In the course of collecting information on various activi-

ties of the Agency with flap potential, we received a number of
reports on issuance and use of disguise and alias documentation.
The Exe~uti ve Secretary, CIA Mal"1ageffient Committee noted on the face
of the summary submitted by the Office of Technical Services (OTS)
on materials issued by it that it would be interesting to check the
reports of other components to see if they matched with OTS issu-
ances. In fact, OTS is not the only component to issue alias
documentation, and the review was broadened to include the other
issuing compo~ents and their procedures for controlling the
materials. The attached report summarizes the findings. -
lJonaJ.Q 1r. Chamberla1.n

Inspector General
Attacr..ment
As Stated
APPROVED: DATE: 24 AUG 1973
DISAPPROVED: DATE:
I
00473
!
.' ,
USE AND C":r;:iTROL OF DISGLTiSE AND ALIAS DOCU1·lEl~TS
General
- ---
1. The policy" responsibilities) end procedures c:oncerning
U.S. doci.l!J1entation issued to authenticate a false i de:,ti ty used
in the Directorate of Ouerations are set forth in CSI (now DOl)
240-J, dated 23 Augu.st 1972. Tnis instruction;, a revision of
CSl 220-'7 dated 12 I.:sy 1959) represents an extensive up/;rading in
the definition of responsibilities a~d in establishing procedures
ens11.rirlg that each :ri?C2.uest has the apI-'roval of a desienated senior
official in the COInp0nent. The current instruction) furthe:t'lliore)
requ':l:'es that each request be routed through Cover and COJ,i.rnercial
Staff, Official Cover Branch (CCS/OCB) for con..currence, ,,"hich, in
effect, makes CCS/OCB the one component retaining complete records
and details of every request. There are no other regulations
applying to this subject, but it currently is observed by a~l
comp.:,r!ents.
Issuing; R~E.1)onsibi1ities and Proceou.yes
2. Three majQr cQI:lponents are responsible fQr issuing alias

docu,'nentation and/or disguise. The speci fic responsibi1i ties c.:.re:
th1s off1ce 1ssues DQn- Qppe acumen s 1n

L------=-T"'1::-a=s-w=-==1..,.1~ch are used exclusiYely for flash identification
purposes. Birth certificates in alias are considered tQ be
a special doclilllent and reguire a uniQuely prescribed approval
procedure and contrQl. This Bra.nch alno responds to reguests
for disguises.
b·1
iss ue s --;Q"'::-:C,'l,.v;-;:Oe::;;r:T'-;::s;---"'~r-1"c~eO'n;:;-!~soe-;;;s----;:;w;';:h;-'1'c>Fn""""ar"'~e~'f'1 uiTTI"T.L"y,......"b"'a;rc>tF""~s""'t~o""pi""p'i">5e7'fQ----.;a;c;s....--.:w,.,e,....lrlr--
as fully backstopped investigative credentials\
c. I
00474
3. p~l re~uests to any of tqe above three corrp0ncnts for
elias doc1.w~entation or disguise must be by memorandum 2.nd must be
signed by one of t,,'o authorized officers designc:.ted by tIle reQ.uest-
ing component. The i:Jstruction re~uires that tbi s c:.:pproval author-
i ty be corlfined to the chief of the division or staff', or to a
senior operations officer specifically designated "Ly the division
or staff chief to exercise this fmICtion. The request is routed
through CCSjOCB for concurrence at which time the requesting
signeture is verified 80S being on the 8opproved list aYJd 80Jl of the
docillllents requested are recorded in the OCB file. All requests for
documents to be used in COriUS are then routed to Office of Security,
Operational Support Divi.sion, Special Activities Bra.nch for approval
and then are forwarded to the cO!ilpOnel~t which is to issue the docu-
ments. I::suing components are required to maintain controls on
a.ccoUlltaoili ty and estabJ ish conditions for use of oocum'2nts that
they issue. OTS is developing a ne1-' computerized system which is
scheduled to become operational in November 1973. Every six mCJnths
each component will be given a. complete listin..g of all documentation
and disguises issued to them and they will be required to eitber
justify tile continued retention of the documents or return the!!l.
~--_. __
COID11C!lent Controls
._--
4. Tbere is no established procedure prescribing bow each
component is to control the documents issued to it. The instruc-
tions do require, however, that the documents will be :handled as
controlled documents from tt~ time of iSSue until their ulti~ate
disposition. The general practice is to maintain a record of ~_l
docunents received within the component, but to issue the documents
to the appropriate officers who assume responsibility for handling
them properly. There is no evidence of periodic spot checking. At
I-east one area division of the Directorate of Operations follo·ws a
procedure which requires that the documents be retained in the front
office Q~til needed for an operation, being returned after the
operation is completed. On the surface this may appep~ to be a
strict control, but in actuality the documents are retained in
'individual packages for each senior officer, and are never insre~ted
before they are issued nor after they are returned; in effect, no
record accoQYJtability by the officer is required.
Ultimate Document Retrieval
5. Every employee using alias documents is now required to

process through CCS as part of his exit-out process for either
resignation or retirement. It is at this time that he is given
a list of all alias documentation issued to him and is re~uested
to return all such documents. If there are any of these documents
- 2 -
0041'5
..hich he is u~able to r-roduce, th~ employEe must su1Lit a slgncd
"'ri tten statement describing, to the best of his abi] :ity, the con-
eli tions under which the doclilllent or docu.ments '·'eTe ei UJer lost or
destroyed. 'l'he controls that now exist were not in op~:ration wllen
Hm.'ard Hw)t was an employee, whic1i may explain hoI-.' he \-ias a-n]e to
retain documents issued in the 19605. Nor do th<:se cOl"Jtrols apply
effecti vely to non-elr,ployees over ;'Thom the A:;ency has no con~.rol.
Host disguise material -- other than aocument.s -- is ).·c'garckd o.S
T,ed-shable and l"lon-sensitive and OTS is not too concerned if

dis['J.ise ms.t,erial is not returned.
6. A new coulputerized system is being readied called CENBJill

(Central Badge and Creaentia1 System). Initially this system will
incluQ'? all of the iSSU8.!1CeS of the badge office, CCS, Central
Processing and the motor pool. . T'ne system will proviae a monthly
listing to these four components of all creden'tials issued and
con} d bE" used to request outstc:nding credentials at the time o:t
checkout. As a follmi-up the system ....,.i11 provide a wee}~ly creclen-
tial status of all employees who have separate·a. but for ",hem CElmllD
still sLows outstanding credentials.
Cone] us ions
7. Since the issuance of DOl 240-4 there hHs been aver:!

definite iT'lprovement in the controls exercised over alia.s docu!i}<?D-
tation. By requiring that every request be routed through CCS/OGB
i'OT conculTence, a very cOIll,1'-ete file of all alias docuL:jentS issued
has been conlpiled. Ttle probability is s+ight that an Agency employee
could resign or retire without having been queried about all the
aHa.s documents which had been issued to him. This procedure, ;'Thile
currently observed in the Agency, has no standing as a general re-
q1.1irement flcd exists only as an administrative instruction in one
of the Agency I s directorates.
8. T'ne OTS computerized system, when operational, should tena

to reduce the nUi'nber of outstanding documents since 'a justific8.tio.n
eveD' six months will be required for their retention. The CENBAD
system will not only maJ;:e the CCS/OCB controJ. even tiOre effective
by mechanizing the up-to-aate listing but in the rare instances
when an officer might depart without turning in his dOCilluents,
. CEl'I13AD -will provide ~his _.data weekly to allow for a follm-i-up.
- 3 -
00476
" " ,
9. Reconmenda.t:i.ons:
8. TI1at an A~ency Headquartc~s Regulation

be issued ~ormalizing the requirement for a
central ft~ency control over issuance, account-
ability &~d recovery o~ alias docilluentation.
b. TI'lat each component designate an alias

docu.1'nent~.tioncontrol officer ....Tho 'Would retain
all documents, issuing them only for specific
operatior.s and institute a policy of signed
receipts and return o~ documents upon the com-
pletion o~ the operation.
- 4- '00477
""c.J Ut~ClASSIFIED , L, \- .~I\NAL
ONLY
,
-.r~-n~ . I ~
O CONF )'HIAl
I
~ . SECRET
fit·" r;i;
ROUTING.-ANO'..;R SHEET \
- .. t .,. . .,
", ..~,.
•• • 0'"' • • • •
~'
SUBJECT: (Optional)
\:. :.: ~ i t:~ ~_:.
ACTVITIES OF POS~.Il?~Jt. \Hir~R.~~.T·:_.~q'J THE"'"DIRECTOR
FROM: EXTENSION NO.
--
II 0,
DATE
25 May 1973 .
--
TO: (Ollicer de.ignalion, room number. ond DATE

building) OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number eoch comment to .how 'ro,m whom
INITIALS
II
10 whom.Draw 0 line ocrou. column offer each comment.)
RECEIVED fORWARDED
1.
I
. -'
512£. 1- 2: U:J !~?-~- -/;
I
t
2. I
C;~
?
w~ ,:; VI/) i \. ......... .:--?
6
l
3. Hu,.·1 [I
h"'J/i,;..Cf::; -10/1
r
°u
..
'\ .... d~~(
3 ~ \~ ~ ~
4.
M\'{ \tj1 ,,\
l/\\
",
"
. b-YO 'b~ 'b
~
",\
'
. /5.
.~.e..vtt0 ~7!Jl.ZA....-/ .~ .~.{~ ...l{~

6.
-
.. ~-b ev-d.e£o..itPvu l!-{'
7.
16- ~
.;)
,/..3/ IJ &~i1fi~
~
. (/, -~,{
'. 'I
? ' liz.,
/7 :/ '::"
uJ,{: --
~rdCI'~
/ .......... /
8.
~
~. -/Wj:~
':)\ !' ~~'l
~
-
~j~ ~-edJ\~EJV v"
9.
I
'f
-c..v. ~
(JJv~ ])4 o?~
<,.':>
l-
10. ) 'U/ ' .
~//
f,-
fl:;;I "
\.. C ""-rC""'"
1/
/-<. L.6lk· .
11.
I
12.
ik.~ l.:..'o..~ ? l~" r.r.f...:.,~i
'l"\ o iZ.i)(D~ 561 .";\l.\.-t-\ c.. c{l o..-l t=t.
o{- ,-,,--'~C.
13. ?>.'\.'1.-<~"t~.,
14.
- ~- .. ~ I rt ft· ."'; "
CJ
P.I , Ir:;a
,~ __ f~~ t:'~. '., •• '~:.. ~i
\1 t:\"i ~ r'l
,A
&..:
r"T 1: . '~ . tf'il
~ '
15. U . . Y.l~ ",..,.f:i';! ~' ,,~~

..
:~ t [::DM Y,1~~ ~
W~~
rr-r-n
. ~ .....--u I t 1-1
00478
0
\
~ 10 US~Df~~~~US 0 SECRET 0 CONFIDENTIAL O INTERNAL', UNCLASSIFIED

'.'
'\,. .- - '. ~ ....:. _ _ :.'''' ~ _ ~ .. _ ~ - USE QNLY .,_ __ k:.. __ .••... ~ ., ,,_. . .. " •.
-Lt
l c~/ok~~!)rDI
f' ")
,,~ l
L _. \.-. ;
- -~,_._
. _. =:J
24 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Acting Chief,IL- __

SUBJECT: Activities of Possible Interest to the
Director
1. A few years ago thel IBranch was asked to

support a test program and feasIbIlIty study being conducted
by DD/S&T/ORD.
en IS
proJec cone u e , e was gIven permission
by DD/S&T/ORD to retai ra and TV image transmission
system for further experimentation. \
IL--- _
2. In early Jun~ 1972 I JDD/S&T/ORD, who
had been the Pro j ect Officet III e v dI ad LIng LJ is TV data 1ink
system, phoned thel I Branch. He stated that the U.S.
Secret Service had a requIrement for this TV camera and data
.1inksystem. It was our understanding that the rnmera would
b~ carried in a helicopter and would be used for crowd sur-
veillance during the Democratic and Republican Conventions
at Miami Beach, Florida. Mr~ ~sked that we make the
equipment available for the perIod desired by the Secret
Service and indicated that the equipment would be returned to
us when no longer needed. On 19 June 1972, Mr. Michael T.
Cas~y, accompanied by Mr .1 1risi ted I
~o pick up the
equipment. Mr. Casey of Secret SerVIce was not made
witting of tpe fact that is an Agency facility. ~--------~
3. On 13 November 1972, the equipment, as a result of

a phone call fro='-- I was picked up at Secret Service
Headquarters by ~ I A few of the system's
~_I
00479
/
(
t,..·..:· :....:.. . . ...•;.- ~'-"A
\
,,- , I
','
I
~{
: :J
;
........ : .. :..
components were missing when it was returned. These components

w~re.the handle, tripod and electrical adapter. Later the
mIssIng components were returned to us by the Secret Service.
4. A few months ago, Mr. ~called me about this

equipment and said that S&T wo~ to get the equipment
off its books since none of it would be needed in the future
b S&T. He offered to transfer the equipment at no cost to
Branch. A short time later the necessary paper
~~~~~~~~ormed to reflect the receipt of this equipment
Branch inventory.
-
• I
004B1
· ..
SECReT SENSITIyE .
SUBJ.ECT: I
_________-----J
Proj ectl -----JliS a Headquarters ini tiated program

which has as its fundamental objective the long term manipu-
lations of selected agent assets operating against EA Division
difficult targets in the leftist and communist milieu in various
parts of the world. Although targetted overseas these agents are
often exposed to and directed against American radical, leftist,
and communist targets to gain a practical'knowledge of the leftwing,
radical, communist world. There is a possibility that an asset
might become suspect and be ~ccused of being an employee of the
Agency or the Bureau; or it might happen some asset would, for
some reason, become disenchanted with his role and expose his
Agency relationship and hjs activities, with resultant embar-
rassment. To minimize potential problems, therefore, each
case is cleared with the FBI and through CI/SO the Bureau is
kept informed on a regular basis.
~sCPET SENSITIVE
00482
00483
-SESRET
-
-
EhE:!! AIsQ)t.w.......
Subject: Cover Support
Bill:
1. In addition to the matters listed in the CCS memorandum on

CCS Cover Support Within the United States the follovring bigoted cases
should be noted:
G. .,. nave no lndications that either of these cases might create

problems. As I told you on 5 l-1arch 1973, I don 't feel the same way li.Deregal'd
to the cover situation of the nersonnp.l ;n r • ,_""_
7 May 1973
004B4
r;-'I Al
'(....~ J .(i... ~,' {It\ SSIFJED II - lJ COft I~J
E'lTf,\l SEC:ET
_ -- ----_._----
.
... ..
'J)(
_._--_.--
- O~iLY - - - - - - - - - .. _._--------- ..... _- -_._-_.- -.- _._-
ROUTli 'G .\ND R~(O;1D SHEET
_._--- .. ' ... _- _. -----
Alias P.l:-',:," as
FROM: ,-, r.i~;fNSi0"i f' N'.· .
I )~Tf
I
8 MAY 1973
- _---L--1-----l
TO: (ORice, duillnolion, ' . .;.." r ··'he'. 'Jnd
-------+----~-,
DATE
_., - - - - - - - - - - - - -
'-.,,;'-1'nlll OffICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show 'ro",-:
INITIALS to ... 1-01". O,ow a line across col"mn alter each (c ... '.e· " .
RfalVfD FORWARDED
- - - - - - . ,.....- ...-- . 4-.,---.-4----+---+----
1.
Mr. Colby,
2.
3.
.... j .... _. . - - ---

<4.
s.
_. - ---. - - ---- -------1----+----If-------l

6.
7.
8.
9.
l 10.
. ~.
11.
12.
.•
13.
u.
- - - - ..-----------.----4----+----+----1
IS, 00485
n CS::F1 QE'ITIt.L
) t • t
8 May 1973
~.1E~,~ORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations
SUBJ ECT: Alias Passports
Chlet, central Cover ~tatt .
f!'1 L TiX+ GOP¥ QQ ~HH RbU}rS£

00486
.'
8 May 1973
MFMORAN1::-Ul\,( FOR: Deputy Director tor Operations,
SUBJECT: Atlas Passports'
1ChIef, Central Cover Staff 1

\
"
00487
- .1 ..J~ ~JII·."M.·.I1l
t ,_ _ ......
, • I .J U\l. t;~lr.
.• _ .._ _ . _ . _ _ ._ _---'- _
'--"'--
, )
ROUTl,~G AND RECORD SHEET

-. .. ... - ----- _ _ 0 •• _ -
-" -_ ..._-- ~- - - -- -----_.- --_ .. _. . ----

51~Oj.f(T lOr' '0 11
- --.. . - .. ------------
COttA+-.1- -- ..
-TU'T'l~~ION NO.
fROM:
I I f--. De> -II ., .

. C/CC:S
CAn
I ~ 7. (~f'.V
•._'l: -;'''':7~
TO: IOfr,(~r de,ignal:on. room number" and UA E

build;ng) OfFICER'S COMME~TS (Number ~'';ch comment 10 sho~ r,om
INITIALS to whom. O,ow 0 line across column Dh~r eoch cor.
_.__ ..... R~alv{D fO~W... qDED
1.
DDO
.
-/
, , ,O'
)
--_ ...... i .; ~
._- - .-
2. j,,:
_._--_ .. 1---._-- -- -" --

3.
,- \
----
.
... --"---
- ' ..
I
5.
·~~~.'>1~~,
. _-_.- - . - ..
6.
---- _.
7.
._- - . __ ._-- .. -- - - -'-
._.
--- ----'- -
8.
,
9.
\
10•
.-
11.
krAVd
7l.LT:L
"T
V ..,7 ~
12.
e-
U Ii
.
.
13.
:
"
rpnyctfr,; ft{r-0.
U.
--
IS.
004BB
0
-
fOI"~
;l.t.. CO;IFI DEllII AL o I
INTERNAL
USE ONLY o UrlClASSlr
...
-,- . dL'tdl' I
.~ ' 7 May 1973 (Revised)
MEMORAhTJ)UM FOR: Deputy Director for operations
SUBJEct
.. CCS cover Support Provided Within
the United states
1. The following specific information regarding dom-

estic cover support-provided by Central Cover staff is
submitted in response to your request:
tion.
a.' '0
" .
Aliases Used in Conjunction with Documenta-
,
,j,\.
,'!
r
The above figures are based on the CCS record-
NOTE: keeping system initiated in April 1972.
I I
!
•. _- ••••• - •••••••••••..•• _ .... P -
l
m
c. Alias U.S. Birth Certificates.
d. Alias Credit Cards.
-2-
- Stcf{ff----- '00490
e. Alias Social Security Cards.
-3-
0049.1
- 00492
1. Support to B1\TDn Activities.
2. The following general information pertains to

domestic cover support activities outside the purview of
CCS:
a. Alias U.S. drivers licenses \
b. Alias CIA credentials \
cn~eI, L;en1,;ra.l L;over Cl \"CUJ.
-5-
00493
7 May 1973 (Revised)
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT CCS Cover Support Provided Within
the United states

estic cover support provided by Central Cover Staff is
a. Aliases Used in Conjunction with Documenta-
tion.
_I
NOTE: The above figures are based on the CCS record-

keeping system initiated in April 1972.
I~-I
ii_-
I
00494
-
c. Alias U.S. Birth Certificates.
d. Alias Credit cards.
-2-
00495
e. Alias Social Security cards.
-3-
00496
00497
~"'!r.-T.
c...:!L\..~
1. Support to B1~D Activities.
2. The following general information pertains to

domestic cover support activities outside the purview of
CCS:
a. Alias U.S. drivers licenses I
b. Alias rTA (!r~d~n'Ha'!Cl I
Chief, Central Cover Staff
-5-
00498
" ;' / l' 'f"'7i
L/. ~ /' /--
CSI 240-4
I . CLANDESTINE SERVICE COVER

'------- INSTRUCTION 240-4 23 August 1972
ALIAS U.S. DOCUMENTATION
._-_.__ ..- ------------_.- " ' - ' - - - --_ ...

..
SE~
'
CSI 240-4
CLANDESTINE SERVICE COVER

INSTRUCTION 240-4 23 August 1972
,----
.-'.
00500
SE~ I
I
I
CSI 240-4 II
i
COVER
CLA1\DESTINE SERVICE
INSTRUCTION 240-4 23 August 1972 II
!
I
r
I
I
i
I
f
I
I
I
[.
II
I
."-
...
t
I
I
I
r
t
I
!
3
S~
00501.
_. __ •..._ _• i
.__ &. ..... _oi
i
-
I •
- SFQR-r:'f
CSI 240-4
CLA:\DESTI:\'E SERVICE COVER

J?\,STHUCTION 240-4 23 August 1972
•...--•..
,
/'-'.
ThomasH. Karamessines
Deputy Director for Plans
-
- 00502
(
SEC~
CSI 240-4
Attachment 1
23 August 1972
i
i
I
I
!
!I
;
I
i
[
i
;
l
iI
i
i
I
I
i
t
I
I
i
!
i
,.t
I
!
I
r
i
,!
i
00503 L __
I
(,
~
CSI 240-4
Attachment 1
23 August 1972
00504
... ..
v l.t
,0
.-~~
CSI NO. 220-7
CLANDESTINE SERVICES TECHNICAL SUPPORT

INSTRUCTION NO. 220-7 12 May 1959
U. S. DOCUMENTATION I
IN CLANDESTINE SERVICES OPERAT:;:;;I""O"NTl5 " - - - - - - -
o
o
o
o
o 1
S~
00505
o \ ~'
.
CLANDESTINE SERVICES
INSTRUCTION NO. 220-7
CSI NO. 220-7
TECHNICAL SUPPOR'!'
12 May 1959'
o
o
o
o
o
I
0-1
I
00506 f
~----=:::::::;:::::;;:;;;:;;;:;;;;;;;;;;;~~---------------..
._-_ 4 N.. ------
ii
I
\0'" . csr NO. 220-7
:CLANDESTINE SERVICES TECHNICAL SUPPORT

I
INSTRUCTION NO. ·220-7 12 May 1959
RICHARD M.BISSELL. JR.
o Deputy Director
(Plans)
Released by:
Richard Helms
o Chief of Operations
i
j
I
,0
I
10'
j
I
Ii
f
I
i
o
00507
·,
7 May 1973
SUBJECT CCS Cover Support Provided Within

the United States

estic cover support provided by Central Cover Staff is
a. Aliases Used in Conjunction with Documenta-

.--- --=t=i=o=n'-.~I I
00508
(
b. \
c. Alias Y S Birth r.ertificates \
d. Alias Credit r.ards. \
-2-
!
,"
~:~ri!J~-,
, 00509
" " ". ~ "
:y·-r,.-;r:y
:.
~ '-
, \ ! _ ..
e. Alias Social Security Cards. r
f. l
g. I
h. I
3-
s~r
00510
_
_... ....
'.-.., =-j)?:'-'
f .
• ,t . "f"",~.~ ,t
I "'. .
.. '.. t· - II
-4-
SEj;R(T
0051.1.
k. I
1. Other Special Arrangements.
(1) Alias U.S. drivers licenses I
-5-
. -
~.·_l ~ 0051.2
~ .. l:
-
(5) Alias CIA credentialsl
Chief, Central Cover Staff
0051.3
CORPORATE COVER
00514
DEVISED FACILITIES COVER
--I 005:15 .
( /
\
PROPRIETARY ENTITY COVER
,-------1
0051.6
•
0051.7
' .. , . ..
" ~.,
I \ ' ........ ,. • TIi. •
• f
, -
7 May 1973

S,UBJECT : Research Project on Robert L. Vesco
1. In mid-October 197;;' L~--.---l---------~""----...!dU~,

Office of Economic Rese~rch as e
par 1c1pate 1n a me~t1ng with a number of OER officers.
During the meeting I ,r J explained that the
Director of Central ~nteII1gence had levied a crash
project on Dr. Edward Proctor, the Deputy Director for
Intelligence, to produce a paper on international financier
Robert L. Vesco. Since the Director had specifically
requested contributions from the field. ~ ~sked
our Division to help in procuring them.
2. We thereupon cabled various questions suggested by
OER to~~ ~nd aSked for replies by
19 OctoDer. ReIQv,nt answers were turned over to OER in
memorandum form. j-In the case of a brief reference in one of
the field messages-to an earlier high-level American
intercession on behalf of Mr. Vesco, we asked Mr. Helms
through his secretary whether this was relevant. information.
The response, again._received through the secretary~ was that
it was not relevant. i
3. Soon after our memorc,nda "had been submitted, ,
ladviseel ~hat the Director wanted
-=e=v=e~r=y~o~n~e~t~o~forget the Vesco project. This was communicated
to·all DDP Headquarters personnel who had had a hand in the
project or had been made aware of it.
I
I L----I
II
i
-
'~
". 'i
:\. -,
0051,8
'" ... :
"~
~..
- 2 -
4. We never had any indication as to the reason for

or the purpose of the project.
5. We understand that OER has recently written a

memorandum on this matter for the DCI.
Archibald B. Roosevelt
Chief, European Division
.-
'.
\
".
0051.9
'- "-_._-- ._ .. --_.- _. .- - ,
_. -.._. ... ..•. _ .. _. - .._-.---_ - _. ..-
..... -
,
,
T·
....t::1
<';
.....
.....
til-
O.
::I.
005Z0
7 May 1973

SUBJECT: Items for Possible Use in Briefing
the DCI
I
1. This Memorandum is submitted in order to

identify to you for possible briefing of the
Director activities which in certain contexts could
be construed as delicate or inappropriate.
2. At the request of the Director of Security,
from apprO~imr!::: :i:-October 1972 t~ mid-JanUary.
1973 safeslte Eas made avallable to the
U.S. Marshal' v C LOr use as a secure residence
by an Assistant u.S. Attorney who reportedly was
under threat of assassination by organized criminal
elements. .
3. I
4. 1
s. Since late 1972 CIA has taken part in seven

FBI training courses at Quantico, Virginia in
response to requests from the FBI. We have shared
with them through lectures and discussions lessons
we have learned which are relevant to their counter-
espionage responsibilities.
005Z1.
(" ;~- ~. _.>
. I
-=
- 2 -
6. As a means of sharing more fully our operational

experience we have invited three FBI officers to be
students in ourl Icourse from 14 to 25
May 1973.
7. The Soviet defector Yuriy NOSENKO was
confined at a CIA facility from April 1964 to
September 1967 while efforts were being made to
establish whether he was a bbna fide defector.
Although his· present attitude toward the Agency is
quite satisfactory, the possibility exists that the
press could cause undesirable publicity if it were
to uncover the story.
DaVIa ft. Blee

Chief
Soviet Bloc Division
...:...- ~'. _. - ~ _ i:..
00522
•
00523
I
00524
---
7 MP"/ ,.~. '7 3

SUBJECT: CIA Narcotics Activities Having
Domestic Implications
1. This memorandum is in response to your request
for a review of activities and relationships that might
have domestic implications.
2. We occasionally report on the activities of
American citizens involved in narcotics trafficking
abroad. This information is normally' disseminated to
U.S. law enforcement agencies and other recipients of
our reports. We also' occasionally request U.S. law
enforcement agencies for name traces on U.S. citizens
who are known or suspected to be involved in narcotics
trafficking abroad.
I
00525
00524 r
....
/
/
7 MP.--/ ,. ~'1 3
~lliMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations

SUBJECT: CIA Narcotics Activities Having
Domestic Implications
1. This memorandum is in response to your request
for a review of activities and relationships that might
have domestic implications.
2. We occasionally report on the activities of
American citizens involved in narcotics trafficking
abroad. This information is normally disseminated to
U.S. law enforcement agencies and other recipients of
our reports. We also occasionally request U.S. law
enforcement agencies for name traces on U.S. citizens
who are known or suspected to be involved in narcotics
trafficking abroad .
We have occasionally received requests

.' 5. law
rOI
enforcement
narcotics
alias documentation for U.S.
005250-.
~
.
officials working abroad on foreign narcotics investi-

gations. The present method of handling such requests.
is for us to request the approval of the Deputy Director
for Operations prior to asking the Technical Services
Division to comply. We insist on knowing the true
identity of the persons to use such documentation and
limit them to staff officers of the U.S. law enforcement
agencies. We also require that we know the purpose
and intended use of the documents. Finally, we require
receipts from the headquarters of the agency involved
and the individual, and also require these documents to
be returned to us for destruction after they have ful-
filled their use. We have turned down requests from
BNDD for alias documentation for domestic use. There
are some indications in the files thai there have been
requests from BNDD for domestic documentation in con-
nection with their domestic investigations. These
predate NARCOG, and weare unable to determine how these
requests were handled.
6. We periodically receive requests for technical
assistance in the form of photographic and audio devices
or guidance for use of such items by U.S. law enforcement
agencies in connection with their foreign investigations
of illicit narcotics activities. We require these
agencies to adhere ta the same procedures we require
in our own operations. From time-to-time we have honored
these requests and have provided sterile equipment when
the requests have been properly presented and approved.
Our records show evidence that several such requests
were made prior to the existence of NARCOG in connection
with narcotics law enforcement investigations in the .
United States. We are unable to determine whether the
requests were fUlfilled.
Chlet, DDO/NARCOG
00526
•
0052,7
_-----.----- ...;..~~ ___::----.~ . .- -.......cf.--t_L__........,...."""4·"_M....'_=.....'_ _ -.M'~' 1.__ ._.
) T SECRET
CRET
CONF ENTIAL
DOCUMENT OESCRIPTION REGISTRY

-.
l
f SOU RCE: .! Q l-,'1)~·...;.,.;,,:;...:.....~~.::-- _ CONTROL NUMBER:
.
.' riC\ 'Y\t\ctJ4 \'\7"3-
1
DATE OF DOCUMENT: DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED:
. ~
I--~----~-
,
COpy NUMBER (5): -.:.\_~~~....:- .....,---- ......,

LQGGEDBY:
NUMBER OF PAGES: ;;). DOCUMENT N
NUM SER OF ATTACHMENTS: ~~D~..:::<?-=.L ----r-'
FROM: Division D/eIB DATE:

I ne I
I ( I l ] i'l r 1:. p r c; 29 Ma v 1973
TO
1
Inspect or General
\tJ V ~o<-.
Room Se.en - 6h' .
I
• 2
3
.
4
o Approval REMARKS
o Action
o Comment
o Concurrences
o Information
o Direct Reply
o Preparation of Reply
o Recommendation
o Signature ")
0
0
Return
Dispatch
_.
\----
0 File
~- /
;/
IJ ........... c •.• J Oa i
'.!C"';":l..
·~005ZB
,- (f '
J
101' SEER!!:T
t¥l!:~ t:111L.I
1_ _1
29 May 1973
iln> 3EGRET
EYES ONI Y
_, .... ,... ..... ~,.... .'!"\.,. nl-Ir-&t''-'
,rlJLL 1[;,1\.1_ .\JVII. - LJU I'V I ,v ..
005Z9
..... -' .."" · .
-. .
•
..
.
.
~ ..
IL----_
29 Nay 1973
I
I
I
~----------------,I.
I
I
,
,i
I ,
i
{
00531.
, .: ".·.
'. '
I_~
1
f
..... """"I"LL""'" I
00532
I
ECRET (
.\.. • t.
SE RET
- i~ . ~.~:.- -~ CONFID TIAL
':'~. .'::". ..
:='.:' '._. I _.
.. _/
"" "'"' ~.-'
. _ - - _.._--- ._--_. .._- --,-._-- . ---

DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION REG ISTRY
SOURCE: CONTRO L NUMBER:
DATE OF DOCUMENT: DATE DOCUMENT RECEIVED: ---

COPY NUMBER (S): LOGGED BY:
NUMBER OF PAGES: DOCUMENT NO:
NUMBER OF ATTACHMENTS:
FROM: DATE:
Chief, Division D - 7B44 Hqs - R e d O 7 May 1973
TO
1
-
2
- ..
3
- - - -_._--
4
o Approval REMARKS
o Action
o Comment
o Concurrences
o Information .. _--_.._ - -
o Direct Reply
D Preparation of Reply
o Recommendation
D Signature
D Return
o Dispatch
D File 00533 .
IL. I
(
\)6
7 Ma'y 1973

FROM Chief, Division D
SUBJECT Potentially Embarrassing Activities
Conducted by Division D
REFERENCE Your staff meeting, 7 May 1973
1. There is one instance of an activity by Division D,

with which you are already familiar, which the Agency General
Counsel has ruled to be barred to this Agency by statute: the
collectionr Lof international commercial
radio telepnone conversatiOns oet een several Latin American
cities and New York, aimed at the interception of drug-related
communications. The background on this is briefly as follows:
T 'ere ore on
L,.,-,----.----;e=p,-;o:;-:;e=m~e=r=--.--n,.,.,.....---.:Tl"'"';r--::::-a-=s.,-;-::e--:::r-~l::r!""Dnl:::V:-:-Yi-=s-::i-=o:::n:-TD'\-:w~o:-:u::-:11
the ':3d----::t ak e 0 v e r
coverage, and on 12 October 1972 we agreed to do so. On
14 October a team of intercept operators from thel I
I lbegan the coverage experlmentallY'
011 ""dnudly I::t/J,I~"K wldte to say that the test results were
]OJ
good, and that it was hoped this coverage could continue.

Because a question had arisen within Division D as to
the legality of this activity, a query was add!essed to the
General Counsel on this score (Attachment A hereto). With the
receipt of his reply (Attachment B), the intercept activity
was immediately terminated. There has been a subsequent series
of exchanges between Division D and the General Counsel as to
the legality of radio intercepts made outside the U.S., but
with one terminal being in the U.S., and the General Counsel
00534-
'-------1
has ruled that such intercept is also in violation of CIA's
statutory responsibilities.
2. We are carrying out at present one intercept activity
which falls within this technical limitation--i.e., of having
one terminal in the U.S.
eL.-~~_ _---=-,
a arge number of totally unrelated conversations, the oper-
ators do intercept other traffic, frequently involving U.S.
citizens--for example, BNDD staffers talking to their agents.
I have described this situation to the General Counsel, and
his informal judgment was that, as long as the primary pur-
pose of the coverage is a foreign target, this is acceptable.
He suggests, however, that it might be desirable to inform
the Attorney General of the occasional incidental intercept
of the conversations of U.S. citizens, and thus legalize this
activity. We will pursue this with Mr. Houston.
4. An incident which was entirely innocent but is cer-

tainly subject to misinterpretation has to do with an equip-
ment test run by CIAI ~echnicians in Miami in August
1971. At that time we were working jointly to develop short-
range agent DF equipment for use against a Soviet agent in
South Vietnam. I land
a field test was agreed upon. Ihe Mlaml area was chosen, and
a team consisting of Division D, Commo, I Ipersonnel went
to Miami during the second week of August. Contact was made
wi th a Detective Sergeant I lof the Miami Beach Police
Department, and tests were mane trom four different hotels, one
a block away from the Miami Beach Auditorium ~nd Convention
Hall. A desk clerk in this hotel volunteered the comment that
the team was part of the official security checking process of
all hotels prior to the convention. (The Secret Servic~ had
already been checking for possible sniper sites.) As the team's
report notes, "The cover for the use of the hotel is a natural."
00535
5. Another subject worthy of mention is the following:
I ~or copies
of the telep one ca SIpS per-
~t=a~l=n~l=n~g~t~o~u~.~~~.-~C~h~lna calls.
These were then obtained regu-
larly by Domestic Contact Service in New York, pouched to
DCS Washington, and turned over to Division D for passage
to FE/China Operations. The DDP was apprised of this activity
by Division D in March 1972, and on 28 April 1972 Division D
told DCS to forward the call slips to CI Staff, Mr. Richard
Obert Soon thereafter, the source of these slips dried up,
and they have ceased to come to Mr. Obert In an advisory
opinion, the Office of General Counsel stated its belief that
the collection of these slips did not violate the Communica-
tions Act, inasmuch as they are a part of a normal record-
keeping function of the telephone company, which does not
in any way involve eavesdropping.
00536
...
.. - , . -\ ' . .
.
-
2& .J-snuary 1973
),fE~!ORANj)U~t FOR: General Counsel
SUEJECT . of Communications in the U. S.

Interceot
1. CIA is jntercepting a~
our comnunications s i t e D
__~ ~~.- righ frequency, international radio te_~-
phone calls or1.gl.na"ting J~ :' n ?-le"lrl York and being
broadc~st to South PBerlca 01 uc =0 directed to ~ew York
I
from South Ame~ica. Some calls are relay calls through
New York but not originating or terminating there. The
calls involve both U. S. citizens and foreign nationals.
,- 2.
the intcrcent team screens tne
L-.,o=...-.....--........,........~.,....."J-related natters. ?-TSA raceives
t h.e f 0 TT:l 0 f in agn e ti c tap e • l..-------------------------------"l
I
tI 3. I would appreciate your very early vie~s as to
i where this intercept activity falls wit~ respect to U. s. law.
Even if it is legal or we can secure the necessar/ authoriza-
1 tions, it seems to me there is extra flap potential associated
J with reports going into the BNDD nechani5~, particul~~ly \
since they ~ay well becpme the basis for ex~cutive action.
\
:<'SignedJ.
Acting
Distribution:
Orig & "- Addressee
t!Ll T~~ I cor t - uu NO I RELEASE
00537
,/
/ j
!
) - •• ,,4 ...
I . ,__
I'
I
I
29 J<:~nuar y 1973
'''(0·
MEM,ORANDU 1'£ FOR: Acting Chief, Division D
SUBJECT: L'1.tercept of Communic;::.tions in the U. s.

REFERENCE: 26 Jan 73 J-.:lemo for GC £r ...~~C/Di~'i.si.o!! D,
Same Subj ect
1.
In referent you request our views as to the legal
aspects of a radio telephone intercept activity carried on at
our communications site I I
2. The basic law is contained in section 605 of the
Communications Act of 1934, 47 U. S. C. 605, which p:Lohibits
lnLer.cCpL.10n
• L ....,.
01 any ra d":to commun:!.catlon
". "th.0Ut.. . "'h
Wl._ t. e aUt.t.orn:(l-
Li-,"
tion of the sender and also prohibits dhrulging the substance

thereof to any person. Chapte:;:- 119 of Title 18, u. S. C., makes
the interception of any wire or oral communication a crime
punishable by $10, 000 or five years' imprisonment, or botn.
There are two exceptions to these p:rohibitions:
a. The fh-st provides for application through

the' Department of ~ustice to a Federal court for a
court ordc:- autho::::izing such interception .lor specific
purposes in cO.!l!lection \vitl;, 12..\V-e.llfo~ccn1ent cuties.
Since this Agenqr is prohibited by statute 'from any
police or la'.v-enforcerne:nt ac~ivities, obviously v-Ie
.cannot operate uncle:r this exception.
b. The other exception is contained. in section 2511

of Title 18, U. S. C., at subsection {3}. Tl~is f>rovid~s
that the prol~lbitton cited <:~bo'.'c on interceptio;'l s>a11 not
005
~..
Ii l"lli t t~l (: Ctj1.1~

ti t 11 tiona.!. p 0"::/ e r o£ tIl (:: }~r t.: s i dE.:nt to tc:!. k:. E;
lle dec:~1.S rlt;CC~;5a?-y to l)!~otect c-:'".. ~~,""li:u-st
SUC11 rrlcr:t..Sttres 2.S
att~ck. to obtain foreign in::dligcne.c Jnfo!'TnatioIl d~crned
0' ...
essential to the security of t}~e United States 01." to protect
such information. and to pl.-atect the United States agains t
. . overthrow by £o~:ce or other up.Ja\~.rful m-=2.ns or against any
·······::..:;:·other·
cled-r an'd l-:)rese'nt C!2n£er to
-i}(estructure or ·exister..ce·
of the Government.
3. The t;lpe of i21£or:n2.tion :;·01.1 desc!'"ib~ i~ ")'''our :rneG.Q:~2.~'"j.(lt~::1.

.Goes not appear to fall within any or ~hese categories and since its
ultimate destinatio~ is BNDD. it appears to be collection for law--
enforcement purnoses.
...
which
'
as noted above is barred to this At.:>'7 E:l1.cV "
by statute.
4. For your inforElation, in most c'ases ;""'There there is a

crim.inal pros ecution for violation of the narcotics laws. the Depart-
ment of Justice queries us as to whether we have engaged in any
interception in connection with the defendants. If a case shoald
involve the intercepti~n b:ing ma,d: I ~t \"/ould
be deemed to be unautnorlzed ana in an p ... OOdO!.IUy .. He p ... US ecution
would have to be ~ropped by the Government. It is our view, there-
fore, that such interception should be carried on by c-ppropriate
la-liJ'-enforcernent agencies in accordance with t~e authority of
chapter 119 of Title 18, U. s. C.
.," LA\'lRENCE Ro HOUSTON

Ge'4!.eral CClli~sel
Distribution:
COP~T 'I-Addressee
Copy 2·':"Genei-al Couns'el" ".
<•
00539
..
• ,
00540
" I
7 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR; Deputy Director for Operations
SUBJECT: Item for the List of Delicate Matters
The Securities and Exchange Commission has asked CIA to provide

information on any foreign connections with organized crime in the
United States. The record indicates that Mr. David Young, of the
White House Staff, asked Mr. Colby to set up a contact for Mr.
T. C. Barreaux, of SEC. Mr. Barreaux discussed the matter with Mr.
Paul V. Walsh, of DDI, and on 4 April 1973, Mr .. Barreaux and Mr.
Timmeny came to a meeting at CIA with Mr. Lawre~ce Houston (General
Counsel) I fChief, FI Staff, DDO).
Since that meeting, we have received no specific requirements

from Mr. Barreaux, but have provided him wiih one PijCe of infor-
mation involving a banking transaction of a associate of
Robert Vesco.
Ch1et
Foreign Intelligence Staff
S~
00541.
•
00542
~·t;·(;H';,..
., ,.' ,
SE( R WILL CHECK CLASSIFICATION TOP AN )TTOM

......., ...
. •...
'-'"
. t---r--V,,";LASSIFIED I I CO~FIDE~TIAL I SECRET
'"!,,."
'"it:
':;~
OFFICIAL ROUTI:\'G SLIP
'4
~
t; TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE
1 Inspector General
2
I-
3 .
':' (- .
'.,; • .
. .
S .1.:;....:,..
AI" •
, ' ,>
.. ':.
::,}~~£(){.>
•I " : ~ .
\i:$,~{~~~c, " ....
.;;.
.,~.:
..; ......
, .. ..
--
' .. .,
.r ...
~;. ....
00543
..... FOLD URN TO SENDER
.
f._~
DATE
. '.'
O/ES/CIA MC/J!".~_:o:::T_~"'" 6June73
I UNCLASSIFIED I I CO!" I SECRET
fO... 110- Us. previous editions (40)
... '!'.
1-61 237
-,
'.':
.. ~
... ,,'..
'~,
" "'"
],5 May 1973
r>:~cutiY" n. ~ist,y
.Dear Bill,
Prior to my assignment to Nha Trang I was assigned to the CI Staff for

approximately 20 months. While I was with the Staff I was led to "believe
that one of their "Group:s" on the ground f l o o r , D was involved in
domestic operations. I believe their target (s) were minority group (s).
The :hief ar d reputy Chief of the Group at that time were
Dick Ober and
respectively. One of their Case Officers, 1 __
spent over 50% of his time TDY within the United States.
It was my under-
standing they reported onll to the White House and to Dick Helms. Other
members of the Staff, including myself, had limited access to the~
area, only when necessar,y and escorted at all times. Perhaps you were or
are now aware of what the operations are. However, I believe I would be
remiss in not responding to the book cable (407190). And perhaps their
operations might have been outside the legislative charter.
Al". dUring my tour with th, CI St,J" I" "dd,ntIl ('''ned th,y
launched someone into Vietnam while you and were there. I
believe this was w~thout the knowledge or approval of Chief,~ (If I
recall, the Case Officer was I I I mention the latter only

because of the following: When they learned that
as being reassigned
from Saieon to Chief,
of D and from the

Operations, FE, they also learned that I was a friend
same area 11....-_--:-__-:-:-:1 As ~ result they cautioned

me not to discuss any
of their operations with This I did not do.
o 44
Sincerely.
---\
j
r- .L
0. '. _ ~-i
_._--
TRANSMITTAL MANIFEST
TO
Chief, BKHBRALD
FROM I No.446603
I
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION USE
10 .
~ .~_
~.- v
_ enve 1 ope under separate ~From I lin respon~
cover for Chief, BKHEqALD to DIREX;TOR 407190 (BOOK CABLE)
'.
00545
.........
;~:M 1236 USE PREVIOUS EDITION
I SJq J-lI1:'1' I
(13-47)
~
t~Et-lOR,., .• DUM FOR: Mr. Colby
Attached is the material we requested of Di
Ober: , .'
A. Ten Reports., Subj: Foreign Support for

Activities Planned to Disrupt or Harass the
I Republican National Convention'

. B ... Five Reports, Subj: Foreign Support JOJ
Aetivitie::s.,~lannedto Disrupt or Harass the,
I
,I
Democratic National Convention
C. Two Memoranda re Agency support to
l
Secret Service for Democratic and Republican
Conventions
Ober advises that the only At~:_~_!,:l'Can we report
on to the lEC is Rennie Davi (14 May 73)
DATEboS4'
FORM 'NO. REPLACES fOR~ 10'101
I AUG S4 101 WHICH MAY BE USED. ,
-..-
'.
"
SEND.iLL CHECK c,1.SS",'CATOON TOP
UNCL ~'SIFIED-r - r CONFIDENTIAL AND~'"
I SECHET
OFFICLJ\ L ROUTING SLIP
1 Ins pector Gene ral
"
5
6
ACTION OIRECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY
COMMENT FILE RETURN
' .
Remarks:
Mr. Broe:
Dick Ober has been advised that this package
is being sent to you. Since knowledge of the
existence of this Com.m.ittee has been strictly
limited, I've asked that it be delivered to you
unopened. Although it has an ER num.ber on it,
it has not been sent through that office - - I gave
them only the day, subject, and originator.
I I
00547
FROM: NAME ADORE.... A~~ ~ . . ~u~ D. DATE
O/ES/MC/I 5 May 7~
I UNCLASSIFIED I I CONFIDENTIAL I SECRET
..
Use prevIous editions (40)
LJ.____..:.'_::.
U~'ln"~\IFIEO
..._. _.__ - _.. [] )S~;~~~\
. . .__ ._._ . "0_- . . .
r T
..
•• _. _. _ _ • _._. __ • - _ . _ ••••_ _•
r.OUTING AND R[CO::D S:·iHT
•• • __.0 ••••• •••• 0 • • • •___
.
r_t 5JtCT: (OJ>'·,n.,11
--.., - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - r - - - - - - r - - - - - . . - - -
FROM: EXTENSION NO. I
1-----
OATf
Richard Ober 14 May 1973
\
r-:-:-----------..:.--,-------+---...Lf------------.-- -
TO: IOfteer de"g""fioll, 'oom numb." ond DATE
buildingl t - - - - - - r - - - - - I OffICER'S COMMENTS (Numbe, .o,h comm.nt 10 .how from whom
IEUIVEO fORWAROED I--I_NI_TI_Al_S.....L, 10 whom. Drow 0 lin. oerOIl column oft., .oeh commenq
' - - - _ .. - . - . - - - -...-. -----+----1----1
1.
Hr. Evans
o/ncr
2.
2. Copies of memoranda con

1----------------4----.. _ ......-.- - - - - cerning Agency support to
4.
rf(~' _ Secret Service (7 April and
~'-='__.. . .~l---=--_=_:->:::::... _ _. -+ 1-__..+-__--1 23 June J972). '
s.
_------_.
. - - -'- '
EYES ONLY
{'-' ,-\- h ~ .J, \-.. V'\ v ~)~

. Ct \-- "'\ K.~; ':I." "..-, e.~
.-
00548
#{ l'iwd
o
I '
61 0 lJ~1 ~~I ,,'OilS

1":I'ON$
r.:J E3
l.-=:JI--!SiJolE~E~RHE~T;....- €QilF IQefiTI.o.L O Iinr:::lAl
USE O:IlY UUCl~.SSIf..l ::~.~
..... ....-(..- ~
":a,
C(W.¥\+I
1 4 MAY l-j/3
b~ -02~
. SUBJECT: Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff
1. Background: Formed December 1970 to produce

fully-evaluated national domestic intelligence studies,
including studies on demonstrations, subversion, extremism
and terrorism. nembership: Department of Justice (Chair-
man); Federal Bureau of Investigation; Department of
Defense; Secret Service; National Security Agency; Central
Intelligence Agency; and as necessary representatives of
other Departments or Agencies (following have partici-
pated: Treasury and State). Staff: lES, Executive
Director John Dougherty and later Bernard Wells supplied
by Department of Justice with title of Special Assistant
to the Attorney General reporting to the Assistant Attorney
General for Internal Security Robert Mardian and later
William Olson. lES has received re uirements direct1
from and delivered re orts dire· tl
\'lhite House. The White House~n'as, insisted that the
existence of this Committee be kept secret. ~vareness
of its existenc wi· in this Agency has been limited to
r[Cr~-DDO .}DDPr; eTCI arur-±OurofITcers of this orrfce-:
2. CIA Participation: Contributions on foreign

aspects (by memorandum with no Agency letterhead or at-
tribution). Contributions occasionally include foreign
intelligence providen by FBI and NSA. The Chief of the
Special Operations Group serves as the Agency ·representa-
tive on the Intelligence Evaluation Committee Staff and
as the alternate to t~Agency representative on the .'\
Committee (who is the~ief, Counter Intelligence Staff};) \
3. Special Report: The Unauthorized Disclosure
of Classified Information, November 1971. This study
was initiated in july 1971 by the White House as a con-
sequence of the President's concern about the release
of the Pentagon Papers by Daniel Ellsberg. Both Robert
Mardian and G. Gordon Liddy initially involved in tasking
the IES to produce this evaluation. Drafting done by lES
Staff members from Justice and FBI. Only Agency partici-
pation was editor· view.
00549
EV~S ~:lY
S NSITIVE
S E. T . . __..
4. Republican National Convention (21-24 August
1972): At the request of the Whi te House, a series of
estimates was prepared by the IES on "Potential Dis-
r'uptions at the 1972 Republh~an National Convention,
Miami Beach, Florida." The Agency provided from
February through August 1972 periodic contributions for
these estimates concerning foreign support for activi-
ties planned to disrupt or harass the Republican
National Convention (copies attached).
S. D~mocratic National Convention (10-13 July
1972): At the request of the White House, a series of
estimates \.,as prepared by the IES on "Potential Disrup-
tions at the 1972 Democratic National Convention, Miami
Beach, Florida." The Agency provided be,tween March and
July 1972 contributions on foreign support for activi-
ties planned to disrupt or harass the Democratic
National Convention (copies attached).
Attachments: a/s
\
\
\
- ,urc;-'
if," ..."
'- ,
':7:~1' lf~
:;, I
~'•..J , ';\; ..
00550
SEI~S lIVE .
L---" 1:' ET
+-
,.\
.. '
00551
.... WI
~:Il--- _ -
.-
' .. . ~
·1)0 ).-{; ......
:
23 FEB i972
SUBJECT: Foreign Support For Activities Planned to Disrupt

or Harass the Republican National Convention
1. There are only limited indications thus far of

foreign efforts to inspire, support Or take advantage of
activities designed to disrupt or harass the National
Convention of the Republican Party in San Diego, 21-23
August 1972.
2. Some American participants at the Soviet-controlled
World Assembly for Peace and Independence of the Peoples of
Indochina, held 11-13 February 1972 .in Paris/Versailles,
attempted unsuccessfUlly to include a call for international
demonstrations to take place at the time ,of the Republican
National Convention. A representative of the San Diego
~ Convention Coalition (SDCC), one of the domestic action
groups targetting on the Republican Convention, requested
the American Delegations' Steering Committee at the World
Assembly to include a specific call for international
support of activities against the Republican convention
in their proposal to the Action Commission of the World
Assembly. This request, however, was dropped as too
divisive by the Steering Committee, despite initial indica-
tions that the proposal would be taken to the floor of
the Assembly.
3. John LENNON, a British subject, has provided
financial support to Project "YES", which in turn paid
-,.the travel expenses to the World Assembly of ;a representa-
tive of leading antiwar activist Rennie DAVIS,. (DAVIS' repre-
sentative is tentatively planning to assist in preparations
for disruptive actions at the San Diego Convention.) ,
Project "YES" is an adjunct to another LENNON-supported pro-
ject, the Election Year Strategy Information Center (EYSIC),
of which Rennie DAVIS is a key leader, which Mas set up to
direct New Left protest activities at the Republican
National Convention. In Paris Rennie DAVIS' 'representative
to the World Assembly met at least once with ~fficials of
the Provisional Revolutlona~y Government of 'South Vietnam;
it is not known if the Republican National C~nvention was
discussed .
.
'
00552
, .
~·IL---_ _
.' :~
4. The SDCC is planning for foreign support for its

harassment of the Republican convention. A working draft
plan of the SDCC includes proposals for (a) the use of a
special television network to broadcast video-taped messages
from other countries, including coverage of sympathetic
demonstrations elsewhere; and (b) broadcasts over public
address systems of live telephone calls from. the Vietnamese
in Paris and from the Communist Chinese and others at the
United Nations.
... :
J •
....
.
.
"
00553
, - .
L
F6reign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt
~r Harass the Republican National Convention
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION:

..
Indications remain limited, thus far, of foreign efforts
--- t.o· insp1 re, support or take advantage of ac t i vi ties des igned
to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Republican
.P..al'ty in San Diego, 21-23 August 1972. The concept of coordinated
international support for domestic activities in the United
States was generally endorsed at the ~ecent World Assembly for
Peace and Independence of the Peoples of Indochina; however, the
Conference issued no specific call for internatfonal support of
dis!uptive actions at the American national pol~tical conventions.
BACKGROUND:
At the Soviet-controlled World ··Assembly for Peace and
Independence of the Peoples of Indoc1ti.:na., held in Versailles
from 10-13 February 1972, there was mention of American plans
for demonstrations at both the Republican and Democratic
National Conventions. The final draft resolution from the
Conference's "Act ion Commiss ion" contains an append ix submitted i
by American delegates whose goal was to secure global coordination
for domestic actions in the United States. It calls for inter-
... national support to six weeks of domestic antiwar actions and
d~monstrations, from 1 April to 15 May 1972, and concludes wit~
, the statement: "This campaign will lead up to the Democratic
1- Party_Convention at Miami on July 9, 1972, and the Republican
Party Convention in Sal} Diego on August 21, 1972."
\
The final "Resolution of the' Paris World Assembly for the
Pe-ate-and 'Independence of the Indochinese People" of 13 February
1972 J drafted ~y the "Political Commis'sion" states:
-
.. "In the United States particularly, the protest against
the war is voiced more and more strongly, under various
forms, such as draft evasions, desertions, resistance, demon-
'ji -" ---.-sttations which now affect even the soldiers. The Assembly
.~alls for support to these progressive and antiwar forces in
_ the United States, and asks the governments to grant asylum
~o deserters and to support their right to repatriation. .
All together, the peoples of the world will efficiently help
to in~6se on the U.S. Government the restoration of peace,
a'nd independence and freedom in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia."
00554
" . "
....
DEVELOPfo.fENTS:
The San Diego Convention Coalition CSDCC), one of the
'domestic action groups targetting on the Republican Con-
'vention~ is planning, in addition to demonstrations, for a
"large exposition in the campsights (sic) called Expose 72,
which with movies, exhibits, displays will portray the struggles
of people allover the world." Plans for activities at
Rx.pose 72 are believed to include Ca) the use of a special
television network to broadcast video-taped messages from
other countries, including coverage of sympathetic demon-
strations elsewhere; and (b) broadcasts over public address
systems of live telephone calls from the Vietn?mese in Paris
and from the Communist Chinese and others at the United Nations.
In addition, the SDCC has suggested that, in order to "outflank
NIXON domestically and internationally," international opposition
can be expressed "by obtaining the authority of other countries
and liberation movements to carry their flags in SDCC demon-
strations." ' - '..
'T-~~""{'t_
' .
...
",
\.
"
.'
.
•
~
\
, ..
·- 00555
- " ._ _-_ - _--~----_.--

--.-
~-.--
····IL----_~·
..
'. 24 APR 1972
., C()/Mt+ {
Foreign Support· 'for Activities Planned to Disrupt bd-~
sm,rMARY:
rhere is little new evidence of foreign plans or efforts

: I
: 1
to inspire, support, or take advantage of actions designed to
disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in San
Diego, 21 to 23. August 1972. The Students for a Democratic
,. Society, in joining the ranks of domestic groups. planning
j
I. actJons at the Republican Conv~ntion, has adopted a proposal
1·
I
i .
to coopera te wi th 1-fexic.an workers and students in a demonstra-
! ·tion in Tijuana, Mexico, during the Convention. The San Diego
Convention Coalition (SDCC), another domestic group targetting
I. on the Convention, has received a letter.of solidarity from
i.
.,! .
the North Vietnamese. The letter is of interest as an indica-
tion of North Vietnamese contact with the SDCC; such contact
will be required for the sncc to implement its earlier-reported
.: . plans for broadcasts over public address systems during the ,
I·
Convention of live telephone~alls from· the Vietnamese in
I Paris.
DEVELOPMENTS:
. At its recent convention in Cambridge, Massachusetts,
held 30 March to 2 April 1972, the $tudents for a Democratic
.Society (SDS) adopted a proposal to hold demonstrations at
the San Diego-Tijuana border during the Republican National
Convention. The proposal included a call for SDS to cooperate
with Mexican workers and students in an action to occur during
a fiesta in Tijuana, where Convention delegates will be
entertained.
\
The North Vie~namese have given their endorsement to \
.~
the San Diego Convention Coalition (SnCC) in the form of a

letter from the Vietnam Committee for Solidarity with the
American People (VCSWAP), a'quasi-official organ of the
..,' North Vietnamese Government. The letter, which has been
circulated by the SDCC and is dated 27 January 1972,
... ·expresses "great delight" with the formation of the SDCC,
and conveys the Committee's "best wishes of militant soli-
~ darity and friendship." The VCSWAP requests that the SDCC
.: write often and "send us materials you have. n
,
I
I
.j
00556
"'.~~ -""1
('dAre +-1
L-- ~------'. ~ -131AY 19?
..
Fo~eign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt
---------o~I'~H~a~I'~ass the Republican National Convention
SUMMARY:
i .
~o Indications remain limited of foreign plans or attempts
~ .·.to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed
I' to' disrupt or harass the Republican N tional Convention in
Iii.-- . _,0 .~ami Florida 21-2 Au ust 1972.
I
L
l'
, ••• o ---l The British-based Interna-

~DrnITar-COnT~~~~on~~o~r~fl~ssa~rmamentand Peace (ICDP) has
distributed a "Spring Offensive Calendar" of activities
in the United States against the war based ona submission
---oy-til-e'Peoples' Coalition for .·Peace and Justice (PCPJ).
"
I! The calendar includes actions'p"lanned in connection with
II'L , the Republican Convention. '
i:
'"
DEVELOPf.ffiNTS:
f
':. ...,
ii'\
L- ----:- ---,---- \
-----'\
The International Confederation for Disarmament and

~--------~P€ace, a B~i~2sh-based antiwar organization and one of the
more prominent member organizations of the Stockholm Con-
ference, has attached a "Spring Offensive Calendar" to the
.'
. April-May 1972 issue of its regular international publica-
tion Vietnam International. The calendar had been furnished
oby the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) and
~~~l~ded the following entry:
.
August 21-23 °Republican Convention, San Diego.
Demonstrations organized by the San
Diego Convention Coalition, Box 8267,
San Diego, Ca. 92103.
, . ASE
;;':'
i;
..
......
FtJLL Tr:XT_~OP)'_ B9 ~lQT ~EI F
OOS57
J
1
, I
~
l·-
-I
The rCDP commentary on the PCPJ calendar urges demonstrations
'-, in support of some of the dates listed but does not specifically
call for actions in connection with the Republican Convention .
.
- .
i"
1
I
.'
I . -
t'
\
- -'I
I-
..
.
,i
:!
.... -
: ..
"'.
00558
.... ,
r • .:~_~.~ __ ~ .~ ~
....• - ..... -.- -~ -
I
14 JUN 1972
. .-
.:. '.
. Co~~~1
Foreign Support for Activities P1an~ed to Disrupt ~
. or Harass the Republican National Convention L-JO-3<
I
I
SUMMARY:
I
I
!
,t
'The only new indication of foreign plans or efforts
to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed
to disrupt or harass the Republican National Convention in
Miami, Florida, 21-23 August.19/2, is an expression of
interest by a member of the North Vietnamese Delegation to
the Paris Peace Talks in the plans of the major antiwar
organizations in the United States for demonstrations in
tonnection with the political conventionsibf both major
parties •.
DEVELOPMENTS:
In mid-May 1972, a membe~ of the North Vietnamese
Delegation to the Paris Peace "~al.k.~ invited a visitor to
contact him again when the visitor 'returned from an imminent
trip to the United States. The North Vietnamese official
gave the visitor the New York City addr~sses of the People's
Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) and the National
Peace Action Coalition (NPAC), and asked the visitor to :
inquire at their offices regarding their plans for demonstra-
tions during the coming summer. The North Vietnamese
official stated that he was ·especially interested in plans
for actions in connection with the Democratic and Republican
• National Conventions •
\
..... "
..
.' .
00559
..
.'
• •• "4 ••
. ... . .
. Z 8 JUN 1~i2'
I·
··,t.:·.<~~.: ~'l:"'''~''.:,.'~' ... ~. :.-', ........ :~.~;: .....'-:: :::':~~:~'... .:~.:,~~ ....::.. _.. -;:-:...... ~ '.~ .. _... ..... .....
'"
>~ ' ..
Foreign Support for Activities PlannedCto'Disrupi

.- or Harass the Republican Nati9na1 Convention
,
i
.
There are no additi6nal indications of any substantial
.
Ir foreign plans or efforts to inspjre,·support, or take advan-
t~ge bf.activities designed to disrupt or harass the National
.. Convention of the Republican Party in Miami, Fl<;Hida, 21-24
I
!
August 1972.
..
,.
. ~.. ..
.. ;..
... ',. ..... ; .....

.
''''~l(.''!- ... '~ •.
,
i •
\
\
'f
'.
-'
.,
j
.. ..
00560
.....
.... '~'-'--'--"'-~ . -.""1:- .• ~ --.~ -_. ,. __ -.~ '---_
'"' ..... -.'

., , ".
.:
~
- -C~,,+I
".
I .:,.. •
'" .A
2 6 JUL 1972
. '
..,. ,
1>()~ ,I
Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt
,,
SUlvtMARY:
- 0.- •
Nev indications of foreign plans or efforts to inspire,
support, influence, or exploit activities designed to dis-
rupt or hara.ss the Republican National Convention in Miami,
Florida, 21-24 August 1972, consist of the following: A
leader of the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice
(pCPJ) has stated that demonstrations will be organized to
take place at United States and allied military installa-
tions abroad during the period. immediately Before and during
the Republican Convention. The PCPJ leader also stated that
representatives of the Stockholm Conference~on Vietnam will'
'~~articipate in activities in connection with the Convention.
'S>The Anti-War Union (A1VU) , a domestic organization which has
been active in planning demonstrations in connection with the
Republican National Convention ,.-·has •.sent a delegation to
Paris, France, to meet with officials of the Democratic Repub-,
lie of Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revolutionary Govern-
ment of South Vietnam (PRG). No information is presently
available, however, indicating that actions at the Republican!
Convention have been discussed at these'meetings. '
,...
DEVELOPMENTS:
In an early July 1972 meeting with prominent members of
.,foreign antiwar organizations, a representative of the People's
Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ), who occupies an impor-'\
tant position within that organization, discussed the plans ,
of the PCPJ in connection with the upcoming election campaign
in the United States. The PCPJ representative stated that
during the" per~od 14 -23 August, a '''Peoples Campaign Against
Bombing" would be waged in U.S. cities involved in the manu-
facture and shipping of materials for use in Vietnam, and
that similar actions will be organized at United States and
allied military installations abroad. The PCPJ representa~
tive further stated that "dramatic demonstrations" in protest
0056:1
...... "'" ..
j.. •
.
4-
,
04
"
"'
I
of the bombing in Vietnam are being organized by the "Repub-
'~ lican Party National Convention Coalition" to occur on
21 August 1972. In an apparent reference to the 21 August
actions, the PCPJ leader added that representatives of the
Stockholm Conference on Vietnam will speak on the subject of
the alleged American bombing of dikes in North Vietnam.
(Comment: We have no present information concerning plans of
Stockholm Conference representatives to travel to the United
States during the Republic~n National Convention; nor do we
have any additional information concerning plans of Stockholm
Conference representatives to participate in activities con-
nected with the Republican Convention.]
The Anti-War Union (AWU), a domestic group engaged in
organizing counter-activities at the Republican National Con~
vention, has sponsored the travel of a delegation of activists
to Paris, France, to mee~ with officials of the Democratic
Republic of North Vietnam (DRV) and'the Provisional Revolu-
,,::tionary Government of South Vietnam (PRG). An advance party
~·has already met with DRV and PRG representatives to discuss (
the agenda for meetings with' the ,full AWU delegation. Al though
no information is presently ava+l1ib:le indicating that actions '
at the Republican Convention have been discussed or are sched-
uled to be discussed at meetings be~ween the AWU delegation
and the DRV/PRG officials, it is known that members of the A\\~
advance party have asked for advice from the PRG officials !
regarding the stance the Awu should take on certain questions'
relating to the presidential elections. It is also known
,that the DRV officials have questioned the A1W advance party
about the political mood in the United States. One of the
AWU delegation members has stated that upon their return to
, the United States about 26 ~uly 1972, sone of the members
will speak at rallies, over the radio, and on television, \
.to "educate the 'American people about the consequences of \
'voting for Nixon, and the need to end the war and defeat'
'Nixon." The delegation member added that the demonstrations
at· the Republican Convention ,will ··be "uniqtIe."
.-
-.
00562
_ _ ••• _•• '._ •• -- . ~ ._ ~~:r.r-~ _ __ .. -- .. _.- .. , -_ • • .- - - - . - - .
..
_ _ _ _I
'2 AUG 1972
, (lb~rltI
or Harass the Republi.can National C~mvention
DO-,3~
SUMMARY:
There are no new indications of sfJecific foreign plans or efforts to

inspire, support, influence, or exploit activities designed to disrupt or
harass the Republican National Convention in Miami, Florida, 21-24 August
1912. Although meetings have been held recently in Paris, France. between
American antiwar activists and representatives of the Democratic Republic
of North Vietnam (DRV) and the Provisional Revolutior\ary Government of
South Vietnam (PRG), currently available information indicates that the
DRV/PRG officials made no, efforts to encourage or give guidance to the
American participants with respect to the upcoming Republican National
Convention. Private discussions. separ~te from the meetings with the entire
American delegation, were conductedb~~,,0the DRV and the PRG officials;
',at present, we have no information regarding the substance of these private
excha11ges. A second group of activists, considered' more important than
the first (~degation, is scheduled to travel to Paris on or about 1 August. 1972 ._
for further consultations with the PRG and DRV representatives. I
,I
DEVELOP?vffiNTS:
. ~'
.
~
In recent meetings in Paris, France, with members of an American
delegation sponsored by the Anti-War Union (AWU), representatives of
the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) and the ProvisioJ;lal Revolutionary
Government of South Vietnam (PRG) were very guarded with respect to dis- \
cussing activities at the Republican National Convention. Although the Vietnam-'
ese repeatedly questioned the Americans concerning the mood of the antiwar
movement in the United States, they made"no direct reference to the Repub-
lican Convention, except for one instance when PRG Deputy Chief Nguyen
Van TIEN accused President Nixon of using the private and public sessions
of the Paris peace talks as "propaganda for the Republican Convention. II
TIEN then urged the Americans to promote and propagandize the Seven
"point Plan offered by the PRG. The Americans. too, for the most part.
;refrained from discussing the Convention, other than to es'timate that demon-
!
,
:
strators will number about 10,000 at the Convention. ' .
r--- - 00563
-
QQ ~18T R[~EA~E"
,-
' ft:J L.1-~QPX
- s I
..,.;-
.~"
.
~
"._'"""l":'---'-"--- _ ,;._.,--_
.. .. , .... ' ~ .. _..- "_ ..•.
JI
.
I
... ..'" . ,.
, •
"
Following their meeting on 22 July 1972 with the AWU delegation,

the PRG officials held additional talks with sub-groups of the delegation.
Additionally, at least one of the American participants was invited by
the DRV officials to return for further discussions. At present, there
is no information available concerning the substance of these private
exchanges.
. .
" A second, more important delegation of Americans connected with
the Anti-War Union is scheduled to travel to Parts circa 1 August 1972
for further consultation with DRV and PRG representatives. This second
group is scheduled to be led by Rennie DAVIS, founder and leader of the
, AWU. This will be DAVIS' second trip to Paris within recent months for.
discussions with DRV and PRG representatives. Upop- his return from
his first trip, DAVIS publicly stated that the AWU would demonstrate at
b.oth the Democratic and the Republican Convention, but that the AWU's
chief target would be the Republican Conve~tion•
• ~ #'~ .. '
!
",
,~~
1
i
~'
'. .-
~-
....
,.
,- ,
00564
:1
<\
. -.
! ~..-------I '
.('0(,1 ~'f.1 9 AUG 1~72
t:>~- -''3
. Foreign Support for Activities Planned to Disrupt
There are no new indications, as of this date, of foreign plans

or efforts to inspire, support, or take advantage of activities designed
to disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Republican Party
in Miami, Florida, 21-24 August 1972.
..,
.
\
~!
" ... . .~
I'
-00565
-
..
..j
••.• ••,r
.•. .",..".,..
,",,' ........ ~,. ..
. "
-Lj
\ '----------====-,--J
b COIJ... ,,1'
b~-
fl
1 6 AUG 1972
,"

There are no new indications, as of this date, of

foreign plans or efforts to inspire, support, or take
£dvantage of activities designed to disrupt or harass
t.he National Convention of the Republican Party- in
~liami, Florida, 21-24 August 1972 .
. " ..
.' "
t'
".~ .
" '
-".. '. ,..~~ .
......J!':~~..,.~
, ; t,t,
i
,J ,
(
... '
•
\
\.
' .
."
,.
'. "
..
I
I - 00566
t -
I,
r-------------r---...!....------------,j
~
. .: .
.. t.,..
)
;:r·l l,~r-T)
•. . l
"_,~_
.
~ES :U.Y
'
. .. ~.; .,:" '.~.:. ".-
.\
t·
I
i
I
"0"
00567
- . _... -~ -~ ·3·... · '.' " - ' : ,~ •.•.. _ - - ,." ••....
",'
"
.. . .
' ... ' . . " ... ;..," .. " ....
..
,
;
_ t
.:..
•
.
...s:··
.. .......
. .. . ." ....
.' .
Or Harass the Democratic National Convention
,
.. S~~RY AND CONCLUSION:

I There are no direct indications thus far of foreign
!
efforts to inspire, support or take advantage of activities
I designed to disrupt or harass the National Convention of
the Democratic Party in Mi~mi,10-13 July 1972. The concept
I
I'
of coordinated international support for domestic activities
! in the United States was generally endor3ed at the recent
World Assembly for Peace and Independenc~ of the Peoples
of Indochina; however, the Conference issued no specific
. '. call for international support of disruptive actions at the
American national political conventions.
BACKGROUND:
. .'.~~">1~~~
.At·the Soviet-controlled World Assembly for Peace

'and Independence of the Peoples' of Indochina, held in
Versailles from 10-13 February 1972, there was "mention of'.
American plans for demonstrations at both the Republican '
and Democratic National Conventions. The final draft
resolution from the conference' s"Action Commission" con,-
tains an appendix su1;>mi t ted by American de l.ega tes whose
goal was to secure global coordination foi domestic actions
in the United States. It calls for international support
to six weeks of domestic antiwar actions and demonstrations,
from 1 April tO,lS May 1972, and conclude~ with the state- '\
ment: "This campaign will lead up to the Democratic Party '"
Convention at Miami on July 9, 1972, and the Republican
Party Convention' in. San Diego"~m August 21,1972."
.. ' The final "Resolution of the Paris World Assembly

for the Peace a'nd Independence of the Indochinese People"
of 13 February 1972, drafted by the "Political Commission lt
...... states: .
. .
", ~
"In the United 'States particularly, the protest
against the war is voiced more and more strongly,
, 'T c~p' = ee I~O ( RELasF!

>.I
':'. ~!.J __l~~~o.~_- - .---------~---------,

:;'i:~;;' ~ "I )
00568
.r·
1
. '"~'''''?' ,<".~;• .',' ',gi . '

. .. .. .. . ,. -, .
..
" : ·::·:·~nder·~;~i·~~~··i~nns, such as dra{t"~'~a'si~~'~~-"'-:" ..
desertions, resistance, demonstrations which
now affect even the soldiers. Th.e. Assembly
calls for support to these progressive and
antiwar forces in the United States, and asks
the governments to grant asylum to deserters
." , . and to support their right to repatriation .
,. .... . . : . .... All together, the peoples of the world will
!
i
I
.' ~:> .:.;
'efficiently help to impose on the U.S. Govern-
" ••~ .•:<,'• . : ....•.. ment the'~~estoration of peace, independence
.~ and freedom in Vietnam', Laos and Cambodia. It
I '.
.... ~ :-
. . :.'
...
- .
.' .
I'
I \
•
•• '
.'.
J~'
. .. ~ '.:
.\ :..... '"
.' . '"
I :.' .
'.,..
..., -;.'... . .;
". -. ,.
j .' . '.' ~~
..... '. :." .: ...."". . .... . '.' .
...: . .
'
,
. '. ... .... . '
- ...' :
.,
..
.:" ' .
l .•.•...
.0.-- .' :,' . !
It ......
It
I!
I.
.. 0:-
.. .., :..
.. ...
- ..
I(
..
.....
:. '
. . \
\
' ..
" "
,.'
.'
.'
I.
I"
I
~'
j
."
'.
i .
\
iI
'. .
'. B~
.
.
_ fUbt lEYJ~B~ ·'£}~r··---=--~-----------.:.----~
REI:EAeer-
00569
,~ 1
- .... ,::-;~;' -, •. \.,,-~, "'t...... :,.::
. ".
- .- - ,,--.:.,-:-~, - ' - - , - - - - '--1' .
o9 MAY
"
i972
.' . '. . ' '. -
"======;:==;==.........----;--------
... . : . ,Cf)/;t"tl
~',
.' , Da·-,,~
Foreign Support
for Activities ,Planned to Disrupt
. or Harass the Democratic National Convention
.'
SUNMARY:
, '
.i
New indications of foreign efforts or pians to inspire"
support, influence, or exploit actions designed to disrupt'
or harass the Democratic National Convention in Miami, 10-13
July 1972, are limited to a reiteration by a member of the
Secretariat of the Stockholm Conference on Vietnam of'a
statement previously issued by the World Assembly for Peace
and Independence of the Peoples of Indochina. The Assembly's
, pronouncement generally endorsed the concept of international
support to a campaign of anti -Vietnam War.'activi ties in the
United States leading up to the Democratic and Republican
Conventions, but made no specific call for support of dis-
ruptive actions at the conventions themselves .
•
...... "I~ •
-/!
DEVELOPMENTS:
"...t~
"
The World As~embly for Peace and Independence of the

P~oples of Indochina, of which the Stockholm Conference was \
a major organizer, had earlier enunciated a similar statement',
in an appendix to the final draft resolution'of the Assembly's
"Action Commission. '! The appendix' called for international
support to six weeks of domestic antiwar actions and demon-
stration~, from 1 April to 15 May 1972, and concluded with
,the statement: "This campaign will lead up to the Democratic
Party Convention at Miami on July 9, 1972; and the Republican
Party Convention in San D.~e~o on August 21, 1972."
. , . ~·o,. I\ttf1<%E -
ftJtL J E&uPtt.:.MJ ~ .r-'- - - - - ' - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - . . . . . ,
00570
't'~" . . . .
' .. '. , .
Z 3 MAY 1972
C6£ln+ I
}>0-:31
-~r Harass the Democratic National Convention
I SUNMARY:
I:
Indications remain limited of foreign plans or attempts
inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed
d~srupt or harass the D~rnocratic National Convention in
Ju1 1912.
The British-based Interna-

t~ona or Disa mament and, Peace (ICDP) has
distributed a "Spring Offensive Calendar" of activities
in the United States against the war based on a submission
by the Peoples' Coalition for_ P.eace and Justice ,(PCPJ). ,/
The calendar includes actions'f<p,J,?nned in connection with
the Democratic Convention. ~.>a\,.
DEVELOPMENTS:
\
The International Confederation for Disarmament and
Peace~ a British-based antiwar organization and one of the
more prominent member organizations of the Stockholm Con-
ference, has attached a "Spring Offensive Calendar" to the
April-~fay 1972 issue of its regular international publica-
tion Vietnam International. The calendar had been furnished
by the People's Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) and
included the following entry:
j Ju1y.9 - 12 Democratic Convention, Miami Beach.

Demonstrations organised by Florida
I
People's Coalition, Box 17521, Tampa,
I
,
· DO NQ1 Rf.lt~SE
Florida' 33612.
fULL 1E'61~f1.:'- - ,---------~

OOS7~
· ---r.--:--:,.
·w·_ :·~··'-""_"':~-:;"----·-:--~""'7:.::""'-·.·_·--' _:r~4.~ . ,.~~- . <.d"·_·~·1~~":(~~.?~~---:·':"""~·~H",:
•f ..... "::i.: ....
.;.
~. <•
" . :;~. .. :1" :.: '.. ··t.·
.....
'. .. .
The' ICDP commentary on the PCPJ calendar urges demonstrations
in support of some of the dates listed but does'not specificall:
'-4. .•
..~al1 for actions in connection with the Democratic Convention .
.. ,
t'
!
" ..
•
,
\
\
..
..
.
• 1
I
0057Z
.......,,~,~:~ ~: ·~·"~7·-:-%;~7~'~·:::7L - --.J
;::';,'.:
." . ." .. ' .....
or Harass the Democratic National Convention
Sm-n...fARY:
The o~ly new indication of foreign plans or efforts
. to inspire, support, influence, or exploit actions designed
to disrupt or harass the Democratic National Convention in
.. Miami, Florida, 10-13 July 1972, is an expression of interest
. . bya member of the North Vietnamese Delegation to the Paris
Peace Talks in the plans of the major antiwar organizations
:in the United States for demonstrations in connection with
the political conventions of both major ~arties.
DEVELOPMENTS:
In mid-May 1972, a member "of the North Vietnamese Dele-
gation to· the Paris Peace Ta11t's""-invi ted a visitor to contact
him again when the visitor returned fro~ an imminent trip
to the United States. The North Vietnamese official gave
the visitor the New York City addresses of the People's
Coalition for Peace and Justice (PCPJ) and the National
Peace Action Coalition (NPAC), and asked the visitor to
inquire at their offices regarding their plans for demo~
strations during the coming summer. The North Vietnamese
~official stated that'he was especially interested in plans
for actions in connection with the Democratic and National
Conventions.
\
'.
.. '
00573
". ."•.... ~~ ~,-;;'.",,~, ... .'

-." ~" ~~. ~\ ('{)t/.1\,..,.
._ ""... - .. - .0 .
I
--~_._.- -~.------.---~_.
. '-,-..:::::::::c------------...,.------------'
f",t1 tJ.., , . ,
21 ~UN 1972
" , . .-
7
. .-~ . '._ .. ~ ":;.- . '._~ -: ~- ... #:..... ':_+_ ... \ . ~ •••• "-.i .. _._..'I!!'-
. ~
.. -
. ...... .... L.. .. _ . . . . . . ' - .. - ... .:.. •

or Harass the Democratic National Convention
There are no additional indications, as of this date, of foreign plans

or efforts to inspire, support, or take advantage of activities designed to
I~ disrupt or harass the National Convention of the Democratic Party in Miami,
I Florida, 10-13 July 1972"

.: ". ~ .- "'.-' .
.
t"
~ "
. !
00574
.__ ~ . ..,~-_ -._- -~-. --~.
'. ,- .~-....,..........'--------._._
I
,. __..,..._ _ .
..
• •
00575
..
'
.. '. ('j'
\ "7 .>
JUN
"3
l. '97%
HE.:llOP..l\~mL;'f FOR: Exccut ivc Director /Co~ptrollcr

VIA ..• Acting Deputy Director for Plans
SUBJECT · Agency Support to the U.S, 5ecre~ Service
(USSS) for ~ational Dc~ocr~tic (~O-14 July
197~) and ~ational Republican (21-24 AU3u~t
1912) Co..vcntions
1. This :',ci:)ornndu~ is for the inforIJation of t~c Execut i ve

Dircctor/Co~ptroller.
2. Aut!1orization for CIA 5uonort to t~c U.S. Secret Service

for t~e Dc!:':ocratic a~lJ ~~enu~lic:1n ~·:ational Convcntion$ is cO;'!-
t'l1ined in a ;;}I)oor<lnd~ of 7 :~nrl1 19i2 froD. Chi~f [1 Sta.ff to
t
the ~CI which was concurred i~ by the ADD? and approved.by the
DCI on 10 April 1912 (cepyattached).'
3. On 13 A1"Ir i 1 1972 the Met •..;i th the )~i:!!":'1 i

USSS rCPTcscnt:J.th·c ~;}d :·;r. }""3d<la~rt(>rs t.o
discuss' rrcli;:ii~:lry pl.!1nnin~ ~or st:,:,port to t!t~
USSS (lrior 'to :lnn It:,:!,,!::~ ~~:~;~~: ,",van.::a..l.ons. !.1nlj'.',nril 1~j72
thoJ land I Il.~ct \lith l~r'l lat P=:!dquart€rs
to lr::plc!.tt-nt t!-:.c prell;;}ln~ry r-18,nYli~~ a~~I eca ur;on in '1i:l::i and
to c.!ctcT!;1ine the extent of HcaJquarters support required by the
USSS. ' . -
4. The basic a~rccnent ~utua11y co~curTcd in by the USSS

and Headquarters representatives proviccd that:
a. I IhOUld conJuct naac traces on

all Cub..-.xs OI: IIltereSt to the USSS.
b. CIA Hc~d~u~rtcr~ would conJuct na~e tr~ces on
all other foreigri born pcrsons of interest to the US5S.
c.. CIA ~ould kee~ the USSS inforncd of a~y events
in the Carihbean and Latin A~crican ~rC3S thnt ~culd
h3.vC any Le;lrin~ on the USSs. protective :nission clurii1~
the convention ncriods. This would include briefinrs
on CUb3 anc Cu!~;n nolicics toward the t'nitcc! StCltes' nnd
On actiVities of C;~3n intclli~cncc op~ratlc~s which
could affect the security of the conventions.
00576 .
.....
.
• •
~
'to
~'-
,
.,.. • .
~.
d. Coverage of Latin Anerican exile ~roups in the

United States ~ould be the rcs~,on5ibility of t~e fBI
since CIA llad C~3sed the extcn~ive toverage for~erly
targeted ag3inst these ~roups since it ~a5 now con3idercd
an intera31 5ccuri~y function.
,----~S~.rr-----~-----~'
---------=-------
6.l \has
~rr:ln~ed the rental of n sa f(,i~CUSC
O1bout five :;linutcs frori convention ccr.ter tI:\ich \-;i11 pro,.. ide a
~~CH-rt:' ~nd neaT9V n{'C''tin::r ~i te for ~~sSS and A~cnc\' 'Personnel_
This safchouso will he :l~aiI31,le just prior to
3nJ~1urir.~ l>oth
convent ions. .\ i'icadquartcrs officer ",i 11 TDY to '~i~:1i 'CT ior to
the conventions and. rC~.linuntil t;i~ convention:; adjc~l'n to
assist I lin providin~ the st:::rr ort descrii',cJ in v3ragraph
four above.
7. Station l~l~r·~ia~i is in daily contact with tho iJSSS in __
'S" •
I' llU11. J,··-
U t1.' llZ1n;
-' _ ir,i\, L ..; •• as a l.~eet .
.. t-"''' ln~ . ,.
s 1 tc w.:en ncCC SSi.1 ry. 1:1e
locat:ion of St<ltio;\ i'iH/;,~iatJi (J:~CO~:'..A) j1DS not been revealed to
the liSSS. (J:·jC03f.A is Ioea ted. sor;c distance fro~ J:-iF.\LCOS.)
Additiona11Yt t~e ~~iaui Security fielJ Office eaintai;\s nornal
liaison with the local ~SSS ~iami unit.
8. Th~ ~nder5tand' that no per50 n nel will be"present
at the conVCH"':LV" ...... [1, that t1~ey b."ill not r-rovi.:1e any c::uiP::'lCl~t
unique to the Agency. nOT n'i11 it provide the use of any ot:tcr
facili tics other than the s~fe~lOuse dcscribe~ in r<lT'agraph six.
00577
•
----~~.
..
...
.. -
- V.....'~-:;,.,..,- - _ _ r,
-3-
~
1'11"
9~.~_A copy of this C~r.0W bcinr. ser.t to
~o insure tha~ the i~ fUlly ccnvc~snr.t ~lth
I l
L,,,rTTll.....~(;"'Unl71(ll"le
1 ine sand ba s lC ::l ~ c ..... _ """, t h t he Secret Sen."l Cp..
and has all of tho infon:.at ion a[~recd upon. in lieadqu:lrters.
5
Theodore
L
P"ft. Shackley
Chief
West.ern HC!:lispherc Division
At tacr.illent
Distribution:
Orig &1 - Exec. Dir/Comptro11er
2. - .~c·"ting DDP
rl I
~Typed 23 June 1972)

---------------------------,---
~
'. . •1 00578
•
. .
,
,,'
1
'" ~~.
.
...
•
\.~.
.....
~
tdj
:'
.'
,
• . i
7 APR U/z.
• • •
•
HENORANDUH FOR: Director of Central Intellir,ence
VIA: Deputy Director for Plahs
SUBJECT: CIA Support to the Secret Service
for the Democratic :iat10nal
.", .
Convention in i'iiami, Fl'orida
JUly 9 - 15, 1972
1. This mernorandu~ deGcribes the support which

the Secret Servicc haG reoucGtcd from CIA \'li til rcr:ard
to the Vcr.lOcratic H<ltionai Convention. It iG rec":
o~mendcd that the A~ency £urniGh &he support outlined
in paraGr~pn 3 of this memorandum and your approval
1s requested. '
2. By memorandU=:1 1-30-610.53 of' 30 ;.jarch

(attached as refC:l'cncc), tne Sec~'~t S2:··.·~~~ ;'L:3
reque·..... t~a·
t: a 1..';;.- _r.,-,- ....,1' -... 'n ap;.lro:.J
-::>r.>t;.-\ .. '4~
......... .;_ e i\.~
II r - ......
n n Cj •• C'~'~';c"""'"
_ ..... L: ....
to discuss the As~ncy's ~upport to the Socret ~2~vic~
prior to and durin; the De~ocr~tic ~ational Cc~:vcn~ion.
The Secret Service plans to send an ?Genl; to ;'ii~::li 0:1
11 April to CO=~ence prep~ration5 for the cor.ven~ion
and wishes to h~ve the ~eetinG ~ith AGency Headquarters
officers prior to the agen~s depurture for ~i~ai.
3. : While details rCGardinG the type of support \
Which the Secret Service will request or the A~ency
will not be-known until there ha~ been a rneel;ing
with the Secrel; Se~vice. on th{~ ~a~~er, it 1s evident
from the Secre& ~ervice meloloranciur.l anci .from our
experience 1n supportinG tne Secret Service al; the
RepUblican Con-yrcntion in Nia.:i1i in 1968 that the
Secret Service de~ircs:
A) BriefinGS on Cuba and Cuban policy

\ \ towards the United States. Counterintelli~ence
information on CUb~ operations a£ainst the
~.
United States whic~ could affect the security

of the conven&ion.
0579
.
. (
(
, "' -' '-,.
.. •
;
.
B) Brlcfi~C~ nn CUban exile ~~~ivitleG

• 1n the United 3t~te~ •
.j
• • C) Name cnec)·:s on hotel and conv0ntion

employccG; n<l;-::e checj~:; on tho:;e perscnG in
the Miami area whom the Secret Service
considers a threat to It~ protective Qission •
..
D) A watchliot of perzons wMo~ the A~ency
cons1dcr~ u potential threat to the security
or the convention.
I E Liai::;on with a desir-:-:atcd officer II

for the nl~:-Jose of can' .uc~g
I '-=-n"""'a"""'m--e-c-"j-lc-cr-:-s-a-G-c..:.-:'l·i-n~~ t ~ \ fi 1 p <" " n d I
i
other riles 4vailable I
4. Agency support tr the Secret Service for the

conver 1;ion ·';iill be ':cn~ra~·.L:ed at nc:;~doua!'ter:3 <:.:.r/
will be cont,'olle( by ji"""ouarters. ~ie!."
under the Ct:.:lieral supervi~ion of '~he CI Sta . . . ,.1. .:. ;J-.---:-:w71'1'1~
'1
BerVe as the cooralnator of thl~ support.
ames Anr;leto:·,
ChWf" CI S~~. . 1.·f
1 AttachQent
cc: DDCI
... •
'.'.
\
, The recor.o"Jenotlti:m ccntained

in paraGrtlph 1 1~ a~prO~CG:
A .~.../\,,-~J.,LLv.. ~\. _
~--:--Ol: Cent;ral ..in~(?.Llil;cnc~
1 APR 1972.
..
. £0[[ IfF~tf - llil Hllf RELEASE .• .-
.~,
- .. .
00580
'*
., .,..
,.&. .... -:r
.... .. ." 0', I":
~
I."oC'\
... . ,
~ I
.t
.t,
J fll\ ' .
,...• ~
"
UNIT2D S-;-I\TES SEC;"ZT SERVICE
WASIlINOTO:'i. 'doC. 20226
o'
• 1-30-610.53
March 30 1 ::'972
Central Intell~ge~cc Aqencv

s
AT7N: . Mrl _
J1J-1ES J. RO~olLEY - DIRECTOR
Dcrr.ocratic ?~t1tional Convention -

Miumi, Florida - July 9-15, 1972
In view of our re~!>onsibilities reC:;lrdir-.g the rrotection

of p~csidcntial cn~ciid~ces, ~Q h2v~_initi~ted ~ccur1cy
?re?aration~ fo=: ~:'1t:? i)cr.,ocra tic l:a1:ioDu 1 Convcn t1on,
whicn will De neld in Mi~~i, Florida, between July 9-15,
1972.
We request a meeting as soon as possible between repreBe~tQ

tive9 of our !ntelligence Division and your agency to
disc~ss intelligc~ce support prior to and during t~2
D~rno~ratic National Convention. We arc specifical:y
inte=e~ceci in ciscussinq the app=opriate cn~nr.~ls for
routing nal1e chec~s of ilotcl and convent ion eI\lployees,
as well as other indiviciuals of protective interest to
this Service. We antici?ate" there will be s~v~r~l
• . ~~ousa~ci n~~e9 co bc checked. We would also like to
disc~es t~e current C~Dan siLua~ion, p~rticularly any
existi~g reiu~io~5h~?5 ~etwcen ~ro-Cub~n grOt~p9 in tna
Hiz~i a=ca sr.c ~ul~l~nci ~~a~ 5i~ce we ccr-siaer ~hege
~==C?: ~o bo Q F~~~n~~~l th~~Q~ t~ ou= pzc~ce~~v~ mlaaion.
..
•• 00581
~.UH. ;_
(
7 May 1973
SUBJECT: Request for Information on Sensitive Activities
You will recall that in Fiscal Yea~ 1971 and 1972,

I believe, Agency funds were made available to the FBI.
These funds may still be possibly held in a special
account for that use. This is one of the areas where
TSD has been very much involved. Chuc~ Briggs would
have the details as this was handled through the Executive

Director's office and of course Angleton would have
additional information.
, I
i i. ~
Edward L. Sherman
Chief
Missions and Programs Staff
00582
8 May 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR Deputy Director for Operations
SUBJECT Areas of Possible EITlbarrassITlent

to the Agency
1. SOITletiITle in the spring or early SUITlmer of 1971, Mr. John

Dean levied the requirement on the Agency for information relating to
the Investors Overseas Service (lOS). The original request was
non- specific but it gradually emerged that Dean was concerned with
the possible adverse publicity that might develop regarding the
President's nephew, who was eITlployed by lOS •.
2. There were multiple channels from the White House to the

Agency on this subject:
a. PresuITlably Haldeman and/or Ehrlichman to Director

Helms.
b. Someone (unnamed) in the White House to the DDC1,

General CushITlan (see attached telephone conversation).
Note that Ehrlichman is mentioned, and
c. John Dean to the CI Staff. These various channels

were sorted out in time and six reports were passed by
the CI Staff to Mr. Fred Fielding for Mr. John Dean.
3. The telephone call of General Cushman's is of interest since

it gives the flavor of White House concern. It took several days to
uncover the fact that the White House interest centered on the involve-
ment of the President's nephew with lOS and possible adverse publicity.
The reports submitted to Dean! s office were routine- in nature and were
coordinated with the DCI. After a few months, interest in this sub-
ject died down and we did not pur sue it further.
4. Please return the attachments when they have served your

purpose.
~ r-
I:-
,.- r- I
, 00583 .
5. I also include a short note on the Intelligence Evaluation
Committee and Staff prepared by Richard Ober. The original
meetings were held in the office of John Dean at the White House
and the principal sparkplug for this group acti vity····wa·s-t-be then
Assistant Attorney General for Internal Security, RobertlvIa-F-dian
and then ]a ter his as sistant, William Olsen. It is noted that M;:--____.....
Mardian is now appearing before the Grand Jury 'and--it is always .........................,.
possible that he might draw in the Agency.
6. Before appointing Ober to the IES Staff as the Agency

representative, I had attended various inter-agency meetings pre-
sided over by Mardian. I expressed the view to Director Helms
that Mardian would require very careful handling due to his inex-
perience. Furthermore, Mardian was deeply.involved in the split
between Bill Sulli van and Mr. Hoover. On a confidential basis
one or two senior FBI officials stated that Sullivan was secretly
passing files to Mardian without Mr. Hoover's permission. This
was one of the important reasons why Sullivan was dismissed from
the. Bureau.
{JaL. Angleron I
Chief, Counter Intelligence Staff
Attachments (5)
00584
Telephone conversation of General CushInan and someone in White House, 23/7/71
. " ..
Bob, how are you.
DDCl: Just fine; I just talked to Jack Sherwood and he suggested I give you
a buzz.
I deeply appreciate it. I asked Jack to call you. I spoke to Rose yesterday,
.and told her III had a little project here for John EhrlichInan and I need very
discreet as sistance from the Company, and I should· like to touch base with
Bob. I met him at Jack Sherwood's. II
_. .. -- .. _....
".-~~--
DDCI: That's right.
That's right and beyond'that I would like to just establish a relationship because
from time to time we have a few needs in your area. Let me tell you what we
need to know here. Yo~r Agency would be the only one to help. I have checked
with the Bureau, Bob, and they have nothing on this fellow. Just a mere name
check but it apparently has some significance, of course. Ray Finkelstein;
born in Belgium about 1940; moved to Brazil about age 12 with his family.
This might'be helpful. He now is working with one Gilbert Straub, apparently
Straub is hooked up with that Kornfeld outfit: lOS. We have a need to know what
Finkelstein is all about.
DDCI: We will do our best, of course; we have some counterintelligence files

which sometimes turn up people but ordinarily, of course, we don't surveil
any Americans but this fellow ~i~ht have come to our notice.
He may not be an American, just a European Jew; ..that is the problem, the
Bureau has COIne up with zero.
DDCI: Do you know where he is physically located?
He may be in Geneva; Straub is apparently in Geneva •

..
'~' .. - "~" ~.
DDCI: Well, let me get on this and I will ,get 'back to you.
00585
r
rUE \VASIlll\GTO:;\ POST Wol,.,c,Jny,FrU6.J?72 D7
---------_._---••• R
Ill' ,(/,.1.. A;/f"'rJIIIIJ !;'l\'Oid r1e;'ll~ Ihal mir.ht rdlrd hh brother oul o-C lrouble. "I have establlsheri, :Ire l'1 rir. \111
• . un(;'\'ornh1)' on the I'rc."iflrnL \\·:1nl lo he f;urc thRt Don "ll~ untrue.
! I'rr::jr!rlll ;'\, .'1" ha~ ::in'll Nol 1011~ .. f1crwilrrl. 1>lll1a111 I'll Iklllin;::1 with the {ccleral F.hrlichm.. n :ll"o r:;W'l Dr,n·
I.,irlr .Tohn J-::'rli' I .',.111 11 .ll'Ii· hl').:an lIirkrr!nt: with .Tohn ~n"ernlllent." S:lid the Pre~;l· 1l1d'~ llQn, ])OI1::llrl, Jr.. a 1'1'·
c.,11' prr~f\I1,'1 ,::' ,,:nmc'! III lIill, p Ilp~lon malluractllrcr of r"'nl "I w:mt to be sure that 1I11:e hcroCl~ the hoy w~nl tl)
krrp the I'rr.<idrl~:·:· i, ... ·I" .~, pl:..\'::' ollnel el'juipl11l'nt. who Don h never a~ked to do any- Swllzerlnnd !:lsl summer In I
~ihll' hrollll'r. \)(lI:;\II1, Ollt "r ,"alllrll the covrrllmenl to . work for lnternnllonnl Cr,n·
hol \I':l\rr. l:onsidcr in~lallin~ hi~ pro 11- lhlnf. th.,t would embllrrass trol!l. The C0n111:HlY has nnw \
00n:l1l1 Nixon h:l<; n w(,:lk· IIcls in urb .. n riol aren<;. \1111 th:<; orrke." tr(ln~ferred young Nixun to
IH"~~ fOI' f:llll'lIinl: fool]s .. nd lold liS Donald roerdy wanl('11 'l"1)('n the Presilient added ns the 13ah .. I1l:lS.
('asY.1l10nr~'. HI' l!'ire! to !':lli~ry 10 he the comp:lny's Wrsl:m :lfll'rlh\)\J~jlt: "Don is the' IIis f.. lher, l:Jlkin~ 10 a few
hoth .. pprlil('~ in the l!l:iOs hy CO:lsl repre~entnlivc, .. nIl 11111 hl'st <;:11, ~.m:ln in the i{ixon visilors, including my :J:.<;lJcj.lI~
horrowinc ~~O:i,OOO from hi!- nol W:lnt to Pllt °in the fix for family." . Geon~e Clifford, considcrrll Ih:Jt
Iion:lire I1o\\':lrd Hllghes to op' federal money. Dut T~hr1ich- The Jl,j:lrrlol.ls agreed to Donald, Jr., was <;omelhing or
er.. le a rr.<;laur:lnt chain, the man quietly vetoed the proj- w:lteh o....er Oon:,ld. and they a di~"rpointmenl to the !:,m-
1I0l11e of the Nixonburgcr. in eel, and the Pre~ident's have scrupulously I,cpt liim ily. lIe had been off in tile
SOllthern C.. lironiill. brother wrote to Hill sayin~ away from Washington. There mountains associating wilh hip-
Two months artrr the 10:tn 11e W:lS no lonier inlerested has been only one awkward in- pies before the o....ersras job
was made, ~ome oC Hu/:hcs' in the company. cideJ;lt. 1?9nald flew to Greece was arranged.
tor nssi~lanls ~:lt do\\'n with :IS one of the three-man team The boy had said he \V;is
J)(ln:1hl 1o ~un'r)" the rhao<; 0(1'\0 Lnll~cr i\lhi~cr lh:l(orr~rcdJ\.larriotrsnirline- going to work for In\"l:'stors
his nrrount~. NO:lh Dirtrirh, DOllnld <llso made coulad ent.ering service to Aristotle Oversens Service, \\"11id1 has
"ho then eljrertcel the (\:1)"-to· with Ell.1er Stone a lawycr for OI1:lssis' Olympic Airlines. been in financial diffil'ully.
d:1~· I\l'l'rnllons or Hugl!rs' em· the fly;.n . \ cro n:llI Iical Com. . •• "I tolel him not to S:Jy lh.ll,·'
pin', rOOlpl:1illrd that Donnlel 1l.'1l~·. Dllt in ricrercl1ce to l1i<; Grcrks BeurIn:; GIftS said Donald, a note of eX;J'jl('r-
I h~t1 l'l)llr tl~nlllt:h l~e money brolher, Donnld to.ok ~.10.ne The Greeks.• who~e miJil;I~YI:lllon in his, \'oic~. "If lh:ll :;.:el'
\\ Ilhnut 11:lj'1II~ off lmportanllhrough the ':::Ullrded '., 111le ;::o\'crnmenl IS unpopular In :lround, he s gOJn~ to hC'ln :l
rrrelilor~. House gates to seC' Ehrlich- the U.S., rolled out the red lol of trouble. I told him h·~
Rut it W:lS too late. Don:tld's man. Afterward, a spol,c!'m:ln cari)(~t for the President's w,'s to say he was gninc: to
restaur;)nt~ \\,('nl bankrupt, for Ryan Aeronauticnl ex· brother. Tom P:lppas, a big work for Intern:Jlional Con-
:lnd the- 1\ixouburher was lost plnined that the pair lweI just Tlepuhlic:ln money rniser with troIs. lOS nnd Inlerl1:JtiolO.,1
to nl:tnkinrl. . dropped by to let it be known oil iUl.C'rr:;ts in. Greece threw Controls arc nllied eompanie!',
The lIlory 01 the ~205,OOO thal Stone W:lS no longcr oct- n I:wish dinner for DO;lald in bllt h~'s not <;uppo~cd to ~Cly
loan knked out r1urin~ Rieh- ing ns Donald's Ier-:ll ndviscr. Athens ;lncl invited members he's \Vorkin~ for ·IOS. "lOti
ilrd Nixon's ]%0 r:tmpnign for When Donald finnlly joinecl o( the Greek military junta. know whal would happen if
the prel'irlene:o', causine him the j\IClrriolt COfjl0rnUOn in AIllI Onassis. the husb'lIld of that /:ot Elround. ,
politic;ll ·paln. J:1nuary. 1970, EhrIiehm:ln the widow of the man who de- "That dumb so·and-l;o," DOll'
,\t on~ tlmr, Donald Ineor. summoned J, WlIlnrd J\lnrrioll Cealed Wehard Nixon for Pres- a1d ~aid of his ~on. "John Ehr·..
1'llrntrc1 hlmsrl( anel bc!:an !le]- and his son, Bill, to the While irknt in lOGO. scnt long- Hehman tnlked to him for. a
lint:: _~hare!l 10 ci1i7.en!l who House for nn Eludienec with ~tC'mmed roses to Don:lld's eOllple of hours llnd told him
n'il:ht h;we an lnfrrest In his the Pre<;ldenl MarrIott had holr! roo in. .' to behave himself over there.
hlood line. Ehrlichman ex. been chairman of the Nixon Woshlnglon whispers thnt You know, he lold nirn hc W;lS
pl,'inNI ~ently to Don:tlcf that Ino111:Uf:ll and is trusted' by Dnnn1rt used his White House the President's nephew and
surh ,"entures could emharrnss the Presidenl . Influence to get enterIng eon- couldn't do anything to emb:!r·
his hrolher nnd thnt, for his Delicately. the President tr:Jcts for l\Iarriotl' with Amer- rass the President."
brothcr's linke, he RhouJd asked the Marriotts to keep lenn Airlines and TWA, wc • Cl1972. ntn-MeC'!uro Bu,dlrat•
.I'1
.1
I
I
I
j
"
IJI/i.
,,--;: 0
f.
rr r1
• r ,..,. 11
\\ r. I " " . j
•-.•:: ,..; Ll U. Pre
his tt
By JAi\JES R. POLK Vesco's bnsh·~ss lJcnuouar- the ,
. S:.or·News SI"U Wrll<>r ters in Fairfdd, N.J., ~ar.r scarcl
Edward C. Nixon, brolher a helicopter f1i~ht Irom New probl,:
oC the Presidenl, is l;eepinJ:! . Yori;: City. How-::~('r ...... Scars inr, fl)
his sileD~e in the face of said he didn't ~t:iy'" 10'{llbe yalue (
court t~sli11lony t hat ho meetiu; :lOlong Ni,;cn, Vesco A \',
plaj'ed a role in arranging a and busincs:; :J~:;ocj;]te::J. ~
s;li.l Ih
~
~200,(lO·) campaign conlribu- The S:'cllrilics 2nd E;~ ; sion 0
(ion in ';clSl! fror.l a finrlDclg r cfJm,:;c C~m'Jli~si(l;l has filed r Trracul \
accl".,td of frilud.
"No comment that Is r.c',"':s·
a e!\'il sEit <lc:.:-inst Vesco :le-
eLlsin3 him c': a :;:'::·1 million
!.
; 1I ~hlJltz, .
man A
worthy. Th;mk you. Good- fr:lUci in. lr.~tilJ;: ii,' n:;srts of 1 .1gCl/1 n ll
bj·e." NixOD said ,,;hen final- his S\·;b·~;.r~U IGS. Ltd,. L ... Itoy As:
ly reached j'estertlay at his mutllal fund ;)·:t\';')rl;. krl SI..
unlisfed tdephone numbcl' . EcJw;'}nl W:;on, .; ~IO ;:~nr3 Eccllomi
In Edmonds, W;lsh., ailer a f.aid is a rlJrJJ;~i' eli:, -:tr':, of:l Dnn1{ in Na::;-:n. Th~ r:1fln:y trnd?:1 I
"cek of calls. Then he hun~ Vesc') CO);1I':lI'Y, i.<. l::c ::~cond was f1CiYn to W;l:i~)ing!:Jn r:,o;;(' d
up. mcmb~r of t11~ 1': ·::·i:!.'nt's April lO, a1lJI(lIl~h (ll~ Ni;;~ln JIi~;l C
A New Jersey campaign family to b~ lin];..,i Lo tho cilIllpign filikc1 to report the cl05C·J :1.J
official. Harry L. Scars, has financier. DO:I:lld A. Nb:on, donation under ill/) new dis- bllffe!il1~
testifiNl he wns told tho a son of the Fi"~il~~ilt'S oth:>r closure law. . 'H:r'k ill i
Nixon brother made a call brother, is Vesco's p('rsoncl A federal court hearing is m:Jll:,,!~
to Washington to confirm that admin;:;trativc ll:;::islant. usu· scheduled ;\ionday in New to nc;'; 1
the donation by. financier ally b::secl in N:ls:;atl, ilie Ea- York City on th':! SEC's bid currcnri-
l\obert L. Vesco "as wanled hamas. for nn injllnctit'n ~:;;)inst "ia. Fran':fll
in cash. The SEC prohe h'ls indl- btion (>{ sccurilj~s ]a-;l's. <Ind Tv'
Sears said under oath hs- eated the ~·,%O,r.CO c.1sh donn- SC:lrs' h'slimony C:1me in a dar to
'Was present when the 42- tion CJmc from fll1),ls at Vc~- pretrial dcpsilion in tbe fen'cr,
ycar-old Kb;on arrived at co's Eah:mws ComrllOnwcallh SEC case. Nixor
• )':'·'---;1
/.'-{c- ':J ''2:1'7
). ;>
'7
.)
'J'J'- '
J:'" no nr.';l
I'., r~''''1 , ,. ,-., r-; "::("',.-. r'\
rlo '") D
tP;;, ,,~ II.
Q.:it
!.
ll;.,;j ~ II iLl .\..~: J., '!~ , ,
:J "'"
00S87
.,r-- .-_.
THE
- - - - - -WALL
-
STREET JOURNAL
-.:~~:;~.:~~,~F~r~i~d~a~~,~~Iv1~~4
ay ,1973
5
I
Mr. Williams, who earJler had asked the
i\ \·SCO .A. rre.st \'1arrant judge to dismiss the contempt application on
technical grounds, saId the circumstances
I
; ."suedf ' Juclo-e
by l?ederal didn't call for Mr. Vesco's arrest.
After t"he court was adjourned, :Mr. Williams'
i declined to discuss reports that the. 37-year-?I~
,li'orGrand Jury I nqui;y :Mr. Vesco intended to renounce hIS U.S. CIl!-
zen!'hip. even though the attorney at an earlier
hearing had said he would raise the question of
Financier Hasn't Been in the U.S. citizenship. "
James W. Ravhill, an assistant U.S. attor·
For, .'Months; IIis Lawyer Fears I ney, brought lhe inatter up in court. saying the
Panel 'Vill I)roduce I~dietment "I government had information that )lr. Vesco
'J was "currentlj' attempting to renounce his U.S.,
citizenship in Costa Rica," where he last j'ear
II _;
By
"E\Y Y
•
a "'ALL 5TH!:!:; .Jot:nXAL Staff
aRK - Federal Judge Edmund L
"
.
R t
cpor cr
~
took up legal residence. It's understood that
·:Mr. Rayhill wasn't referring to a disclosure
i P .. I:llJe n Issued a warrant for the f' -r··9.- -.ma!;le late Wednesday by Costa Rica's presi-
b' ttl d T"\ J . arrest 0 e:n- den"t. Jose Figueres.
: . " ,..e J ew ersey financier Robert L. \'e;,(;o
I):
:'~r del' to b.rlng h!m as v.itness before a gr:lnd " j Pn~sident Figueres, on Ii two·day visit to
• '. ;. here In\'estlgating his acti\'ilif'~ :lIr i this country, said that :.\lr. Vesco in an audi-
: \ P.,eo has been out of the tJ S fo' ~~.. -
, months. "
I
J .'-' era i
i ence two or three v:eeks (lgo formally an·
nourJ,,'d his L'ltention to rei10unce U.S. citizen·
I No
•
criminal char..
b
es h ave been brolJoht'I
I ~galnst ~Ir. Vesco. But the U.S. Allorney's "of- I
ship.
In Washiq;ton, the Slate DrF-1.rtment said
f~~e, whIch requested the bench warrant, pre. Mr. \'esco }:as lold Co~ta Rican authorities that
\lOusly had asked the jUdge to find ::III'. Ve:>eo he already h~ renounced American citizenship
In contempt of court for fallincr to heed a "ub- before two notaries, with his lawyer's help.
~oena ordering him to appear before the n-r~nd
Jury. The gO\'ernment tried to serve th: sub.
poena on April 15 in Nassau, B:'1hama Islands
However, the U.S. Embassy in Costa Rica con- ,
tended that didn't count, because it wasn't
done before a consular officer. The State De-
I
,!,he grand jur~' is understood to be investi- partment's legal experts are checking to deter-
gab~g the. circumstances of Mr. Vesco's $~50. mine whether that view is correct.
000 In con.ribulions to President 1'\Lxon's 1972 The U.S. has a 1922 extradition treaty with
r.t'election campaign. At the lime, the S~cl:ri. Costa Rica, covering 21 crimes, including rob-
tIes. l111d Ex.c~ange Commission was conrlucling bery, forgery, embezzlement, and fraud. The
I' a v. ell Pu?hcIZed inquiry into 1Ifr. Vcsco's bUSi./

Ilf'SS ll~f;lIrs. The SEC file dahuO"e civil suit
,.~,;~~n~~ him :J?? 41 ~t!l(~I' men nn-cfconcems all I
U.S. considers its 1931 extradition treaty v.ith
B:-itain to apply to the Bahamas, but it isn't
'tlear whether the Bahamas agrees. The British
I 0\ .•-" T!le Nixon fmance committee returned

Jllr. \ es~o s c011tributio{ls to him on Jan. 31.
treaty covers such crimes as fraud and misre·
presentation, but the warrant issued yesterday
I. 1\1r. \-cseo's attprney, Edward Bennett Wi!.
,hams,. told the jUdge y('sterrlay he had n'a~un
for a grand-jury appearance isn't a maller for
which extraCition is possible.
Ito b~h.('\·e !hat :Mr. Ve~:o would be indicted by Mr. Vesco has a home and family in Boon-.
the ",r.lnd Jury. Mr. WI1Jams s3id that if forced
t~ nppear. :\1.1". Vesco would in\'oke his ~on!;titu.
I ton, N.J., but has bases of operations in Nassau
and in San Jose, Costa Rica. Government pros-
I
tIOna 1 lI riyilC'ge ag-ainst seIt·incrimination lin. ecutors declined to comment when asked whnt :
les~ he ,,'ere ;;-rantcd immunity nn-ainse l'~.ose'l steps the')' would take to have ]\lr. Vesco ar.'
cUlI,on. J\~.l". Williams added th:it l~ U.S. J\tl~r. res led if he were located in either of those I
ney S offlee had alrearly replicd to llim that it countries.
wouldn't ofl~r immunlt~•• The SEC's eh'n ~lIit accuses Mr. Vesco of!I
directing- the "looting" of S~21 million in :lssets :
of four fOl'eign mutual funds managed hy I.O.S. ;
Ltd. Mr. V<'sco formerly headed both ).O.S. !
nnd Intern3tion:l1 Controls Corp., of Fairfield,:
N.J.
I
00588
-
'7 MAY 1973
SUBJECT: Intelligence Evaluation Committee and Staff
1. Background: Formed December 1970. Membership:

Departm0nt of Justice (Chairman); FBI (active staff par-
ticipation agreed to only in May 1971); Department of
Defense; Secret Service; National Security Agency~ CIA
and any necessary representatives 0f other Departments
or Agencies. (Following have p;nticipClted: Treasury,.
State.) Staff: IES Executive Director John Dougherty
and later Bernard Wells supplied by Department of Justice
with title of Special Assistant to the Attorney General
in reporting through the Assistant Attorney General for
Internal Security Robert Mardianand later William Olsen.
IES has received requirements directly from and delivered
reports di rectly to John Dean of the \Vhi te Hous e.
2. CIA Part icipat ion: ~~o~ntributions ion foreign
aspeLts (by memnrandum with no~ag'ency lette'rhead or at-
tribution). Contributions occasionally include foreign
intelligence provided by FBI and NSA.
3. Special Report: The Unauthorized Disclosure
of Classified Information, November 1971. Initiated July
1971 by the Whlte House as a consequence of the Presi-
dent's concern about.the release of the Pentagon Papers
by Daniel Ellsberg. Both Robert Mardian and G. Gordon
Liddy initially involved in tasking the IES to produce
this evaluation. Drafting d~ne by IES Staff members
from Justice and FBI. Only hgency participation was
editorial review.
(Table of contents attached).
00583
"
j.
I ~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
Introduction
Problems Relating to the Disclosure

3
of Clas sHied Information
t'
,
Executive Orders and Related Directives 8
E:ffectiveness of Existing Security'

13
~egulations
18 \ i
Lessons of the 11Pentagon Papers" I
Conclusions and Recommenda tions 31
l
;,
- , _.~
00590
&c·"r~
.~.
- t\C {./'
I i
L: II I ,
NS1 ! ---=--\
l
SUBJECT: The l£ril=HAOSProgram
1. The~HAOS program is a worldwide program for

clandestine collection abroad of information on foreign
efforts to support/encourage/exploit/manipulate domestic
U.S. extremism, especially by Cuba, Communist China,
North Vietnam, the Soviet Union, ~orth Korea and the
Arab fedayeen.
2. The r1viijCHAOS program has not and is not conduct-
ing efforts ~mestically for internal domestic collection
purposes. Agency efforts are foreign. Foreign-oriented
activity in the United States has been of two types:
a. Selected FBI domestic sources who travel
abroad in connection with their extremist activity
and/or affiliations to make contact with hostile
foreign powers or with foreign extremist groups
have been briefed and debriefed by Headquarters
officers. The briefing has included appropriate
ope r a 1: ion a I g 11 i ..1-1 nc e, inc 1 udin g de fen s i v e advic e .
b. Americans with existing extremist creden-
tials have been assessed, recruited, tested and
dispatched abroad for PCS assignments as contract
agents, primarily sourc~s offered for such use by
the FBI. When abroad they collect information re-
sponsive tollilliJeHAOS program requirements, as well
as other Agency requirements. They are thus used
primarily for targeting against Cubans, Chinese Com-
munists, the North Vietnamese, etc., as their back-·
ground and their particular access permits. It
should be note~ that thet: :'lasp:c~ ~ft~e
~ IproJec;t of thl:: 5C J\ :ta DIVIS10ij) IS
Sl~lIaT to thelll1J:HAOS PROGRAM. .
"3. As indicated earlier, [f'nj)::HAOS is a foreign pro-
gram, conducted overseas, except for the limited activity
described above. The program is and has been managed so
. as to achieve the maximum feasible utilization of exist-
ing resources of the O£erations Directorate. No a~sets
---LL~I~lldl~E~[f~~~Q~PX~. ~=~DQ~~9~J...a...Fol-'"E~A...
~E-
00591
have been recti'i ted and run exclusi"-vely for the lilll~HAOS
program. Instead, emphasis has been placed on the exploi-
tation of new and old Agency assets who have a by-product
capability or a concurrent capability for provision of
information responsive to the program's requirements.
This has involved the provision of custom-tailored collec-
tion requirements and operational guidance. This collec-
tion program is vieloJed as an in~gral part of the recruit-
ment and collection programs of lC.J.tina Opel atiollS, Vietftam
j Op.e.xatioDs, Cuhan Operations, SoviE?t Bloc Ditii-s-i-on-o-p-era-
I ti,Qns and Korean Branch opel at iOBs;J Agents who have an
American "Movement" background or ,.,;ho have known connec-
tions with the American "Movement" dre useful as access
agents to obtain biographic and personality data, to dis-
cern possible vulnerabilities and susceptibilities, and
to develop operationally exploitable relatjonships with
recruitment targets of the above programs. These assets
are of interest to our targets because of their connec-
tions with and/or knm~l~~e of the American "Movement."
Over the course of the &1"ljJ:HAOS pr:'0gram, there have been
·approximately 20 important areas ,of operational interest,
c; hiCh at the present time have "be'Em reduced to about ten:

Paris, Stockholm, Brussels, DaT-~s'Salaam, Conakry, Algier.s.,
Mexico City, Santiago, Ottawa and Hong Kong. ------------
l
4. The~HAOS program also utilizes audio opera-
tions, two of which have been implemented to cover tar-
gets of special interest.
a .1
b I
.
;;
00592
5. frnjcHAOS reporting from abroad relating to the
program originates in two ways: Individuals who are noted
in contact with Cubans, the Chinese Communists, etc., and
who appear to have extremist connections, interests or
background are reported upon. Other individuals are re-
ported upon in response to specific Headquarters require-
ments received from the FBI because such individuals are
of active investigatory security interest to the FBI.
. 6. All cable and dispatch traffic related to the
fr~CHAOS program is sent via restricted channels. lit
is
,not processed by either the~able Secretariat or the In-
formation Services Division~ The control and retriev-
ability of information obtained, includin¥ information
received from the FBI, is the responsibilIty of the Spe-
cial Operations Group.
7. Information responsive to specific FBI require-
ments is disseminated to the FBI via special controlled
dissemination channels, i.e., by restricted handling cable
traffic or via special pouch and specially numbered blind
memoranda. .
8. Information of particular significance, when col- .
lected, has been disseminated by special memorandum over
the signature of the Director of Central Intelligence to
the White House (Dr. Kissinger and John Dean), as well as'
to the Attorney Gener~l, the Secretary of State and the
Director of the FBI.
00593
"
• •
00594
SF"NDER WILL CHECK CLA~~IFICATIONTOPAND BOTTOM
--tiNCLASSIFIED I I CONFIDENTIAL I SECRET

1 - Hr. Halpern /'

2
'~
3
..... '
• '-
6
COMMENT FILE RETURN
Remarks: 'r .
,
-,..,
Sam:
Attached are the follmving:
I-background paper on TIC #7
2-comments on facts and statistics
3~comments on AID by Mr.~chlesinger
"
1963 (which Mr. Colby might find
of interes t)
00595
..- ..
"
.- FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER

- FROM: NAME. ADDRESS ~D PHONE NO. DATE
I I 25/4/73
UNCLASSIFIED I l' CONFIDENTIAL I SECRET
",
00596
'.
,·. .....
~,IH10RA,\!DUM FOR: Deputy Director for Operations
SUBJECT Counter Intelligence Staff,

Police Group Activities
1. Counter Intelligence Staff, Police Group (CI/PG)

is responsible for Staff coordination within the Office
of the Deputy Director for Operations for activities and
programs involving assistance to foreign police/security
forces for the purpose of exploiting such activities and
programs for intelligence purposes.
CI/PG maintains liaison with the Office of Public
Agency for International Development (OPS/AID)
training facility, the International Police Academy
CI PG also administers and supervises Project
coo r 1 n a e
F:"""""::=-=-=-=--=-=--=-=-:...L--=-:::....!....":"""':::""
Central Intelligence Agency
~----------~p.erc~_l~n~llcc~a~~nn~vNe~s~'l~gationsCourse. CI/PG provides
and counsel to the Area Divisions in matters
to police/security functions and activities.
details of these functions are as follows:
LIAI SON "II TIl OPS/ AI D
CI/PG liaison with OPS/AID and IPA is conducted on a
daily basis and consists principally of:
A. exchange of information on IPA particlpants, some
IOf "hom later attend 1 lcourser 1 1
n. arranging for inclusion of Agency sponsored partici-

pants in IPA/OPS/AID training programs,
C. arranging for IPA/OPS/AID briefings and tours for
foreign police/security representatives sponsored
by CIA Area DiViSio~ns . 00597
(\. . r'r
,,/0.
ojl~
t
1
-=
, , . i
- 2 -
j
D.
13 . providing general information pertaining to

.,..
~
police/security organizations, activities, equip-

.~
ment, and personalities requested by Agency
operating components,
F . coordinating the Agency's participation in the
,.-'
Technical Investigations Course designed to
., familiarize the trainees ·"ith the technique
required to properly investigate terrorist
activities ",herein explosives have been utilized,
G.
H.
PROJECT
eng age p 1'1 n Cl p a~l~l~~i~n~~~~~..........:!~~"=--E."-"---

~~~~~security personnel under
and selling pOlice/sec~l~~y~e~a".u~l~p~m~e~n~~~~~~~
po Ice security personnel and organizations. I
provides special training programs and briefi=n--=g=s----:z::-=-
foreign police/securit nersonnel of interest to
operating divisions.
.1as
*I~ -
00598
- 3 -
I I d o e s not maintain direct contact or liaison

wit~ enforcement organization, local or federal,
at horne- or abroad. ,,"lhen the need arises, such contact is
sometimes made on our behalf by
a lome an noroa Jecnuse 0 e nature of its activities
(training of foreign police/security personnel at home
and abroad), and its P~)lic Safety programs around the
world. 1 Ihas such con tacts at horne - local and
federal Level - hecause its personnel arc personally
acquainted with law enforcement officers throU:~hout the
lIni ted States. Jfemhers of the I _
l h ave appeared as guest c,r"e"c..-orlcQrT"I"'l""e,.."l."s,.---a",..,...c-"'S..QT7"ljrrl----,.t"'e"c,..,1e"""r""'a'I---
'---l'r)"'l7C"S.....t'l.....t'Tu"'tions as the U.S. Park Police, IPA.., the U.S.
Secret Service, and the U.S. Treasury Enforcement Division.
3. In addition to the liaison mentioned in the
previous paragraph, the Agency maintains liaison in varying
degrees with foreign police/security organizations through
its field stations. The existence and extent thereof,
however, is a decision to be made~ Area Division,
and is not the responsibility of ~
4.
WI t Dan
e....,-.;,:~l't'-:r::-l~o=n--=e:-,-----::-7'C-=---=-=-=-=-----=::-:-:=-::T-::-:c::-=-::r-c-:-::,----.:-r.:-=--"""""u=I):-:a::-::m=-.
=a=r=o,-,:s;-.-----rl) an r,ri t l' ion e ,
an experienced and respected law enforcement officer, was
a bona fide DPS/AID officer assigned to the AID mission
in Uruguay, and was never a CIA employee or agent.
~ J S-----,h..,.,j..,-,rL,"'-'-'1=e..,..c-,.o.....
J,...,lll..,...e....
Chief, fo~~ter Intelligence Staff
00599
_.:FP()-7.~ -(S7 J
n'1 M~~1973 /
I
2 ct IL ( CL..A.. c..R...:
~ ,
1": A-. SACjn c
......
. ~1E~·10RA~DU~f FOR: Deputy Di rector for Operations
SUBJECT : Joint CIA/USAID Terrorist (Technical)

Investigations Course t7 (English language)
C1 Staff's Project I I
1. This effort is a joint CIA/USAID training program

for foreign police/security personnel. The initial phase
of the training \dll be conducted at the International
Police Academy'CIPA), Washington, D.C. during the period I
2-27 April 1973. The following subject matter is covered
in this ~hase of the training: investi~ative techniques,
collection and preservation ofeviJence, records, files,
and rcportinp'. gathering of information on terrorist
groups and their activities. a student se~inar devoted
to discussions on terrorist and other hostile activities
currently existing in their respective countries, etc.
Thi s phase of the tra ini ng is concluded hy a t~I{O day
orientation ~y the Berr.!, Squad of the Dade Cotmty Police
Depart~ent in Florida.
second phase of th is training wi 11 be conducted

during 31l April - 25 ~fay 1973.
a. Providing trainees with basic knOWledge -in the

uses of cOID1i!ercial and milit::x.ry demolitions and
incendiaries as they may he apPlied in terrorism
.. ....
' ~
and industrial sabotage operations. .
b. Introducing the trainees to conmercially available
materials and home laboratory techniques likely.
to be used in th~:rnanufacture of explosives and
incendiaries by terrorists or saboteurs.
00600
" ,
-"
... ~.-,.~ .~~"""
- tL:-- '7 .
... •
- 2' -
c. Familiarizing the trainees with the concept

of target analysis and operational planning
that a saboteur or terrorist must eMploy.
d. Introducing the trainees to booby trapping
devices and techniques givin!t practical
experience t,.ti th toth lilanufacturecl and
improvised devices th rOl1~h actual fah ric3. tion.
E~phasizc the necessity of alertness for
detecting and countering booby traps placed
by sR.botcurs or terrorists.
e. Conducting several field exercises to give

each trainee the opportunity for detecting I
. and neutralizing various eX!Jlosive and
. incendiary dcvi~es likely i~ be used by
tcrroris ts or sa~oteuTS, includln~ letter
bombs, packages, attache cases, etc.
f. Conductinr, several investir.ative field
exercises of explosive incidents to alert
the trainee to the need for and nanner in
which to collect, identify, and pre:;eTve
legally admisablc evidc~ce for prosecutive
action.
3. The program provides the trainees ~dth ample

opportunity to develop hasic far.Jiliarity and use proficiently
through handling, prerarin~ and a~?lying the various
explosive charges, incendiary arcnts, terrorist devices
and sahotage techniques. t;Sl\ID, International Police
Academy (IPA) ~as received reports from for~er forei~n '
police/security personnel ,1'1)0 participated in the program
indicating that they :IOTC called u?on to utilize t'lC skills
they acquired through this training in the handling of
explosive devices in their respective countr • Attnc~ed is
a letter from a pnrticiuant in TIC 16
stating that he deactivated a letter k--==r.-----:::lr=.-....---:oo=-----;-;-r--:;'-=-':..-----!
sent to the I IEmbassy in 1 _
4. Subject course will have 26 participants from ten

(10) forei~n countries. ~ine (9) are financed by AID.
eightr(~) by CIA and nine (9) by thoir own govern~cnts.
00601.
---' '.
- 3 -
s. Separate end of course reports will be prepared by .

" USAID and CIA,TSD personnelJ
James Angleton
Chief, Counter Intelligence Staff
00602
FACTS P~D STATISTICS
AID/OPS TRAINING
!.ID/OPS, International Police Academy sponsors some

seven hundred (700) foreign police officers for training
These officers are scl~cted
in the United States each year.
from underdeveloped countries./ I
I --~·
ITRJ\INING
I
r------'I I
ltralns some ~~n-4na of these orflcers
L~~.[....-[1-.... a."a"'r"'e;--;a"'s~o"'~t 1 aw en for c e me n t . I
ec....l--.a--..t"I'----"-Ze"':=-
,[1..,......,.
::;_ ..... \
\
During FY 19731 Is,:rppo~te~ t"JO of ou~ field .
stations by providiA""'g~....,.t'"'r""'a"'lnlng In VIP protectIve seqlrlty
for I ~ersonnel. .
AID/OPS- CIA TRAI;UNG
During FY 1973 two joint USAID/OPS/CIA Tecllnicallnvesti-

gations training programs were conducted for foreign . D
police /se curi type rs onne 1 representing IIcoun tries. The
purpose of the training is to develop ~vidual student
technical capability to realistically conduct investigations
into known or suspected incidents of sabotage/terrorist
bombing or other acti vi ties.
L-- I006Q3
:
A7.t.
• .. .
NATIONAL SECURITY
Political, l\lilitary, and Economic
Strategies in the Decade Ahead
Edited by
David M. Abshire and Richard V. Allen
Acl,miral Arleigh Burke, Director
TIlE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
Publisbed for tbe

HOOVER INSTITUTION ON WAR. REVOLUTION : "
AND PEACE
by
FREDERICK A. PRAEGER, Publisher
New York· London
00604
,ii- . , . "• •
" ,
Strategic Leverage trom" Aid 'and .Trade"
•
-JAMES R. SCllLESINGER
Summary
The analysis of this' paper rests' on the- assumption that

American policy-inakers should not be so concerned with the
pursuit of hard-to-obtain ideological objectives that they exhaust
the power potential implicit in trade and aid relationships.
Rather the trade and aid programs should be -managed so. as to
preserve an environment in ll;hich pressures can be brought to
bear to serve the national interest at a later, and perhaps moi'e
criUcal, date. This emphasis on power considerations implies
both (a) that th(' assistance prof/ram cannot be based primal'ily
on humanitarian 01' idealistic goals, and (b) that economic ties
with other nations should not be severed simply because of our
disapproval of other social systems, including those based on
communism. Though typically public opinion vastly overstates
the strategic leverage that can be gained through economic
. ~()eapons, 'this leverage is still not negligible. One can argue that
in the past the United States .llas failed to take advantage of
the power potential 'implicit in aid and tmde through its failll1"e
to develop concepts and mechanisms of dete'rrence in ways akin
to 1.Oha~ has been done in the military field. Much of the
difficulty may be asc:,:ibed to a failure to develop sanctions,
which discow'age actions u~favorable to o1ir interests, as well
as incentives, which. encourage cooperation. No system of
deterrence can exclusively stress the carrot and i.qnore the stick.
},fore is being demanded of the aid program than it can
reasonablyachiet"e. Assuming that the primary emphasis of the
aid program, is to encourage social and economic dc'relopmfnt
rather than to' elicit direct SUppOl't for American foreign pollcy
687
00605
- -------~- --- ------ -Q-----.-. :--~:--':-:-~-------'---- --
f
688 JAMES R. SCHLESINGER
objl'Ctives, it is argued that 1/'1' ,~hould allempt to derdol' slable

Jlodal and polilical condilions by slren!J'hrning Ihe "legilimacy"
QI the dn-eloping social order in Ihl' ryl'_~ of the ,-r_~peclil'c
publics-ralhcr than attempling to cxporl thl' trappings of
American demorracy.
Technological change, the easy Ilrailabilily of.~lIb,~lillllrs, and
the lenathy period for adjustment in a prolongrd st rU!lolr hal'e
all reduccd the impact of the "supply e.ffecl" which lms at one
time the main lreapon of economic warfare. If th(' ('conomie
tceapons of strategy are to be at all efjectit'e undcr today's
coruJitions, the "influence effect" mlLSt rise correspondin,qly in
importance. This implies that lFe shollid be in a position to
threaten to do dallla,qc to other I'conmnies Ihroll,qh the curlail-
ment of access to West/'rn markets. In order to ke/'p this threat
4~ ever-present on/', ?L'!, mlLSt.. hOlcel-'rr. continul' to lrodf' in
,,?plume leith othcr cOllnt,'il's, includino Communist ones, Parlie-
'+rly'in dealing with the underdevf'loped nations Ihe potential
~'I/J~etiveness of such threats may p,'ove to be considerable.
00606
696
One tinal consideration-it would be unwise to use potential

weapons of this sort for niggling purposes. The balance of pay-
men~ has been troublesome and is properly an object of concern
in \\'ashington, but surely it is not a first-order consideration
in our relations "'ith the underde\"eloped nations. Suggestions
have been bruited about that we should make use of the aid
program to fOI'ce recipients to bu): from us in ways that go
be)'ond tied aid. Under the best of circumstances, our bargaining
power is limited, and shooting away strategic ammunition for so
paltry an economic goal would seem to reflect a poor sense of
proportion.
Aid
Within an over-all framework designed to discourage hostile
or predatory attiturles toward the West, the aid program may
seek to foster thE' maximum ratE' of economic and socbl progress.
In the basic policy of AID, the Kennedy Administration has.
explicitly adopted this goal. As has been indicated there are
costs to this decision. Outsiders are not likely to be much liked
even under the best of circumstan.ces, which hardly apply to the
underdeveloped countries, and their inten'ention in whatever
dirE'ction will in the long run excite antagonism based on' real
01' fancied wrongs. Ke\'ertheless, the basic decisio~ has been
made. Let us examine in what way we may proceed so that the
good effects clearl)' outweigh the ill effects.
There are· two initial postulates: (l) our bargaining" power
will be limited, and (2) Amel'ican notions of social reform and
of equity are neither necessarily applicable in the underdeveloped
lands, nor need we assume that those whose cooperation we
must win will tind them appealing. ThE'se postulates are inter-
related. Jointl)' they imply that we cannot press forward on
all fronts to create a societ)' in which a good American democrat
wi11 feel at home, but must instead concentj'ate our energies on
those social changes which will spur economic growth even if
the immediate results are more consistent with the cultural
genius of the peoples im"olwd r:lther than our own tastes. \Ve
ought not expect them to make the same choices as we would,
or, if they make the same choices, to achie\'e in a ten-year period
what it took us ei!!htr years to achieve. Finally, in reaching
judgments on social processes in other lands, we C3nnot apply
\yhat are our own-<Ir, in re:llit~.. higher.--:standards of purity.
As outsiders. we will bE' unable to perceive the social function
of behavior which is 'superficially corrupt, and will t~nd to lump
00607
697
it together Idth that which is purely parasi{ical. With respect

to our Qwn history. retl'ospectively we hnve come to find merit
in "'hat once were regarded as the disreputable procedures of
an organization like Tammany Hall in that it prodded a kind
of social security and a welcome for the newly arrived im-
migrant. "'e are accustomed to the daily dangling of new post
offices, good committee assignments. lind brirlges over creeks in
the outback before wavering Congressmen. and warm approval
is given. for its fine sense of political realism. to whatever ad-
ministration is doing the dangling by those who agree with its
goals. Toward similar procedures abroad we are inclined tq
take a simple muckraking attitude. We look askance at the
higgling of the political mllrket-with a naivete that would do
credit both to missionaries and old-style political reformers. If
we hope to achieve a fair measure of success. we shall hnve to
sharpen our critical faculties nnd lenrn to distinguish between
unappetizing socinl del'ices which are functional and those which
are simple barriers to progress.
The statement of objectives by AID is a very ambitious one.
The purposes of the assistance progrnm include stimulation
. of self-help. encoura~ement of progressive forces. and achieve-
IJ
'
ment of governments based on consent. which recognize the
dignity and worth of individuals who are expected to participate
in determining the nation's goals. No doubt, a statement of
aspirations is in large part window dressing, but the criteria
by which self-help is moving toward social and political progress
are more specific: a more equitable distribution of income. a
more equitable tax system with increased yields, expanded wel-
fare programs, increased political participation and civil liberties,
and so on. Several points'may be made regarding the objectives:
first. there are too many; second. they are to some extent in-
consistent; and third, they ignore the real resources avnilable.
There is. in the first place, the lonl!-perceived clash between
economic progress. on the one hand, and the combined goals of
equitable distribution of income. immediate impro\'ement in
living standards, and security on the other. This underlying
conflict spills over into a tension between I'apid economic pro-
gress and the introduction of democratic processes. On this
issue there appears to ha\'e been a revolution in informed
opinion in the Unit.cd States during the past five years. During
the late fifties, it had become almost an axiom that authoritarian.
if not totalitarian. go\'ernments had innate arlvantagcs in guid-
ing economies toward rapid growth., The prevailing view was
00608
~.
'(
698 JAMES R. SCHLESING::R
based, no doubt, on an assessment of the record of the Soviet

rei!ime, and an exnggerated notion of how much the Chinese
"Great Leap Forward" would accomplish. Perhaps the earlier
"pessimism" regarding the relative pel"formance potential of
"free" and "controlled" economies was m'erdone, but ha ...e we
not gone too fnr in the now pre\'ailing "optimism" that any clash
between economic progress and the democratic institutions which
inslII'ethe dominance of the rox populi is minimal?
The average citizen-":particularly when he is ill-housed, iII-
clolhed, ill-fed, and iII-educated-seems most likely to be in-
terested in the here and now. A government which is responsive
to the desires of the public \\·m continually be tempted to
mortgage the future for the present. The "abstinence" or
"w:liting''' which c1nssical and neoclassical economics state to
ue necessar~' ingredients in economic progl'ess will ue hard to
requil'e, as will be the incentive schemes (and the accompanying
conspicuous consumption) w[lich are Iikel~' to strike the 3\'erage
voter as inequitable. We may recNI that the Peron regime was
(and still may be?) the most popular regime in recent Latin
American history. Or we may obsen'e the economic cOl)sequences
of Brazilian democracy, and ha\'e our doubts. The inflow of
American resources may be able to make showpieces out of
sevt'ral small, recently-democratized nations like the Dominican
Republic, but we ought not nssume either that democracy assists
in economic development, or that the Dominican example is
widely applicable. This is not to say that some judicious
prodding in the direction of democracy may not be a wise policy,
but it must be judicious, and cannot be based on the assumption
that democracy necessaril~' fosters the political stapility essential
to growth.
One of the criteria by which self-help can be judged as justify-
ing additional aid is an improvement in the savings ratio. Some
stunents of the aid pro~ram would put major emphasis on
chang(os in the savings ratio in that it pro\'ides a relatively
ou;iective stannard by which an improvement in economic. per-
fonnance can be judged.· If we apply an objective stanrlard.
complaints about the distribution of aid and subjectivity in the
• ("h~rl". Wolf. Jr, of RA~D ha" he.n altemptins: to develop an ""ono-
mctrir model which win provirle an ohj~tiye measure of the performance-
of aid rpcipient. in terms of self,help, The criterion is the sa";n!:,s ratio.
In the" model the altempt is m~rle to eliminate the infiuence of other
\"3Tb~I(:!\, such as per capita income, income dh.tributjori, and dE'~ or
urLaniz:Jtion, which ac('ount {or' a J:ood drat of the ohsenoNJ vari.3tion in
tilt> ,,::..w inbs r:,atio as between nations and between different periOds .of lime.
00609
00610
(
8 May 1973
SUBJECT: Foreign Resources Division Operational

Activities with Possible Flap Potential
REFERENCE: FR Me:morandUlTI,I--,----_ _-----J1 dated 7 May

1973, sa:me subject
1. The answers to your questions are as follows:
a. Question: Do we recruit A:mericans?
Answer: Yes, we recruit A:mericans to be

used asl ~upport assets and access agents.
These A:mericans are used for spotting and asses s-
:ment purposes only and do not perfor:m any recruit-
:ments.
b. Question: Do we use alias docu:ments on

A:mericans in course of operations?
Answer: Yes, we do use alias docu:ments when

recruiting A:merican support as sets. The great
:majority of these recruit:ments are done in alias.
All recruitrnEmts of foreign targets are done in alias.
c. Question: What disciplinary controls do we

have over alias docu:ments?
Answer: We :maintain a current list in FR Division

Headquarters of the alias docu:ments is sued to each Base.
00611
( - - Ii . . --e .;- i
-'a----
-.~ ,r:
... C !f~:-.
/2/
More iITlportantly, each Base Chief is responsible

for supervising and ITlaintaining control over the
alias docuITlents used by the case officers on his
Base.
d. Question: I
---=-=----..:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.J:J Any clearances or prohlblhons'?
Answer: I
2. If you have further questions, please let ITle knovv.
Acting Chief
Foreign Resources Division
00612t
.:;-\SSlrIED ._---_.
_._.-._._. __
L.J U)/t~l~fl\ o
-----------------_.O
CON.;£NHAl
---_.. _---
. Sf" ("er
. 1.".
ROUTING AND Rf:CORD SHEET

c.ouATr a:.--------..
_ _ _ _ •••• _ .... ~. _ _0 4 ...... _. _. • _ _ ~_. •
SL:5JeCT: I
-:r==--=-
(0;>1,0 01 0
-FROM;·----l-- .- l r---f-'--EX1E-N-S-ION- ~O. -~Q

Achne: ChIef, FR DlVISio I OA)'--------
I I 7May1973
TO: ( O F r , c e J " lm number. and DATE 1 - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - --._--
building) __ OffICER'S COMMENTS (Number each commenl 10 .how from ... I-om
REalVEO
fORWARDEO INITIALS 10 whom,0'0'" °
line aero" column after each com",..n!.)
I---------------.-------f~----+_--_+----+_--------------------
1.
EA(DDO
. - - .-_._. - ....-.------... - - - - - . - - - - - f - - . - -
2.
3. DDO L.' "~"', ":.~ I

, •. . '1
I'
t:.~~ LJ \.1::.::.;.
- - - - .--------------'t'-----t------- _.---
--_.
8,
9.
10,
.
11.
'---
12.
-
13. I
-!
1.4.
"'---.-
_. • ...r-v,. I"f"\OV
..
nn l"I{)T Di=l i= /1 cr= I
IS,
L- ....:- .:.- --1

fORM
3-62 61 0 U~! PRI VIOUS
[OITiONS
o SECRET n (O~~FI OEr~T1Al o r:;H~fJAl
IIU nlJlY o urKlASSlfL
7 May 1973
SUBJECT: \!'oreign Resources Divisi~Operational

Activities with Possible Flap Potential
1. At thr risk of stating the obvious, almost,all of the operational

activities carried on by(FR Division I . un the risk =lr
that unauthorized disclo~~re could create enl.barrassment to the Agency.
We have accepted this as a condition precedent,'and have proceeded with
our operational activities in the most profes sional manner pos sible under
the circumstances. There are certain rather unusual activities in which
\FR DivisioIl)las participated and/or is participating'that contain some-
what greater possibility for embarrassment if discovered. I have listed
the se below, not neces sarily in order of embarras sment potential:
a.1 provides a fairly considerable

amount of support to Dr. Klssmger in his contacts with the
Chinese. This support was authorized by Mr. Ka.ramessines
and Mr. Helms. Thus far there has been no problem other'
than the inordinate amount of time spent by I
personnel, not to mention the fairly sizeabl';:;e----;:;-a-:::m;;::;-;:o:-;u:;-;n;:;-,t,.,----:;o;O-;f.----------
money that has been expended in support of these efforts.
b. I
lfI~~~~~~L..a5.ELbEEA~-S~E 00614-
S~~C[~~·fi2:~;J5r(~\lE .fxe~p(r)fJ) (b)('5)
/2/
c. Alias DocuITIentation: Clearly, FR Division does

the great ITIajority of its operational work by having its case
officers utilize alias docuITIents. All recruitments are done
in alias. Thus, the alias docunientationis a prerequisite
for effective operations I IFurtherITIore,
our case officers have utilized fully backstopped alias credit
cards for renting autoITIobiles, ITIotel rOOITIS, hotel rOOITIS
for operational meetings, etc. These credit cards are back-
stopped by accounts in alias which are proITIptly paid at the.
appropriate tiITIe. I see no probleITI in the continued use of
alias docuznentation and moreover, I feel it i"s absolutely
essential to continue using alias docuITIentation wherever and
whenever pos sible.
d. I
e. I
00615
~XfnfPf (/»(,)
( b)(??)
/3/
2. SUITunarizing the above, I believe that all of the activities

outlined are clear! within the acce table risk frame.
The
'-----:-;.,....--:---;-;---;-;-;--------;--:-;------;-----;;--------.,------;-----:,-----;--_ _----.-- -,-----.----.-_---l
other activities, although clearly involving some degree of risk are
necessary and valuable and in my opinion should be continued.
Actlng Chlel
Foreign Re sources Division
\.
-,..
-",...., .....
\
: ~
0061&
~ -' f3Xf>Vrf( t" (b)(,))
( b)(1
S E ~E T
DRAFT OUTLINE FOR DDO BRIEFING

I. Statement of Organization and Functions
II. Official T/O
I I I. Location of Field Units
IV. Cover
V. Targets
VI. Methodology
VII. Budget
VIII. Coordination
A. Internal
B. External
X. Statistics:
A. Recruitments
B. General Support Assets
C. Positive Intelligence (Reporting
006:17
FOREIGN RESOURCES DIVISION
I. Statement of Organization and Functions
00618
S7 ET
s~ 00620
S E~E T
00621
J
:) t C JZ . T
00622
· .
00623
S E C~ T
00624
S Ey<T
006.25
00626
00627
00628
~T
00629
SJ C R ~ 1.
~T
00630
S~T
s~
00631
· .
00632
· '.
~T
00633
-.. .
.0 ."",,'-
". , _ _..1'I0Il.1' ' =_________ ,
.(' '~.
i
6 JUri 1973
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence •

.
THROUGH : Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee
SUBJECT : Alleged CIA Involvement in the Ballou Case
1. ,By memorandum "dated 25 May 1973, I informed you of the

results of ,an interview of Mr. I Iwho reported that
Mr.1 r
n employee of the O~fice of Security, had
. stated dunng a (fiscUSSlOn period at Advanced Intelligence Seminar
No. 6 in September 1971 that the Office of Security had been involved
in the "Ballou case. II (The residence of Mr. Ballou, an antique gun
collector in Silver Spring, Maryland, was raided oil 7 June 1971 by
Montgomery County Police and Federal law enforcement officers.
When the office:rs,' dressed in civilian clothes, forced their way into
the house, Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers opened
. fire an~ seriously wounded Ballou. He was hospitalized for several
months and ':Vas left partially paralyzed. I believe he is now sUing
over the incident. ),
.
2. We interviewed Mr[ fertain other employees who
attended the Seminar, and the Director of Security to determine jus t
what was said at the Seminar and the extent of any Agency involvement
I
in the Ballou case. We find that partiCipants in the Seminar were
encouraged to discuss the details of their work and ~ssociated problems.
Mr.1 Fe'ntioned an as~ignment he h~d been or: wi~h. the U~~., . .
Secret SerV1.CC at the 1968 Natlona1 Conventions and hIS !laJ.son aChVlhes
with the Montgomery County Police.
3. I I
reports th~t in 'disc~ssiiig the latter ,subject he .
related a con\'ersanonhe had Wlth Inspector r the Mont-lof
gomery County Pqlice, sometime in June 1971 after the Ballou incident
had been rep. rted in the newspapers. Ac,,'!)rding tol lthe '
'I police inspector had thanked him for some amplifying eqUIpment uie
I Agency had given to the Montgomery County Police and remarked that
I )
00634
II
.-
it
r
• #. .-
-~Y'
I this equipment had probably saved a policeman's life. The inspector

co.m.mented that the account of the Ballou incident appearing in the
press was not the whole story. With the aid of the equipment the
Agency had provided, the police had intercepted a telephone call
\-J
I,
. from Ballou to a friend in which Ballou outmed plans to "kill a cop." /.
The police then staged a raid to forestall Ballou's plan, and it was . 1
daring this raid that Ballou was shot.
i 4.I Jsaid that he has no other knowledge of the Ballou
I1 1
~e, except lor wna he has read in the newspapers, and that he has
not had any other conversations about the case with any members of
the Montgomery County Polic"e. We learned nothing from our inquiries
that would indicate any other Agency involve=nent in the Ballou case.
"•
s. The following are related excerpts from the "Family Jewels"
aabDlission of the Director of Security on 16 May 1973:
During the period from 1968 to 1973. several items of

Positive audio equipment consisting pri.clarily of clandestine
. transmitters and touch-tone dial recorders were loaned to
the Metropolitan Police Departnlent; Fairfax County, Virginia,
Polic.e DepartInent; Montgomery County, Maryland, Police
Department; New York City Police Department; and the SaI}.
Francisco, California, Police Departlnent.
1 II
On 25 July 1968. and at the specific request of the
United States Secret Service, this Office provided two audio
I
counterllleasures technicians to the United States Secret Service
in connection with the Democratic National Convention held in
Chicago, Illinois. This was not an official detail although
both men were proVided with temporary credentials identifying
thexn as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service.
On 15 August 1968. we detailed the same two men to the

United States Secret Service to cover the Republican National
Convention in Miami, Florida. On both occasions. the team
menlbers were debriefed upon their return ~nd it is clear that
their activities were confined exclusiv~ly to sweeping the
candidate~' and potential candidates' quarters.
William. V. Broe
_I Inspector General
i 0IG:0<6 June 197·3)
Diat . .\
Orlg & 1 - Addressee _ 2 _ 00635
., 1 - ExecSccj CIA M.Q
! 0":- t. _ ~. --= . 1.--'
a • .'. -
-
-
(
· . -=".
MEMORAI JM FOR: The Record
--c=J
Mr. F. P. Bishop is following up per para 7
of IG memo to DCI dtd 25 May
cm/31 May
00636
(DATE)
FOR" NO. R~PLACES FORM 10· 101
I AUG 54 101 WHICH NAY BE USED.
1"-:{~-~
; r:(-;>-
o UNCLI\SSI FI ED [J, . ONLY TI (8,.r ·f: Al B ~ECRET'

SUBJECT: (Optional)
fROM: EXnNSlOH NO.
DATE
Inspector General
25 May 1973
TO: (Offic... d.,ignation. room numlat. and DATE
building) OffICER'S COMMENTS (Numb., .ach comm.nl 10 ,how from whom
INITIALS to whom. Drow 0 line across column ofter each comment.)
RfCltv£D fORWARDED
1.
-
Mr. Wm. E. Colby ((~~ .(?).~ r
'L---
2.
3.
The Director
Pt ~'1 \.-\ ~\'J~ I ~~-:
-c\.~ \1...~ -J Cr \:' (t i.Cr \ \ \. \1 Y.

.4.
- ,r' ~i
-!1"-1
!- b ,
5. ")
6.
/
7.
8.
--
9.
,
10.
11.
12.
13.
1.4.
15.
. 00637
/
n UNCLASSIFIED
t .', ( ... ,," "c..
25 May 1973
THROUGH Mr. WilliamE. Colby
1. On 17 May the name· of I ~as

referred to this office as having attempted to contact the Director
concernin "activities outside the Agency. II I attempted to contact
on 21 and 22 May, but he was on leave. On 23 May
......-e-s..,...ta-t..e----.or-.-e--...Jwanted to check a portion of his information and asked
if he could come to my office on 24 May.
2. came into the as a JOT

in Octo be r'--r"Q"""'l.-r-...".........,......,.........--r."............~rrr.....,,,...j s s i gne d
to the S ovie t / EE Sec tion. a'--.v-e-r-y-s-'-t-r-o-n-g-p-e-r-s-.-o-n-n-e--.l. file.
3. I ~dvised that in August 1971 he attended the

Advanced Intelligence Seminar. On the·first evening of the seminar
the students had a "getting acquainted" session where each one
:ve a brief descriEtion of his duties. One of the students, r----l
I lof the ()ffice of Security, however, ca~on
fer the seSSlon was over and expanded on the briefing he had given.
He claimed that CIA was cooperating with the Montgomery County
Police, stating that the Office of Security gave electronic and other
support to that organization.
4. He further indicated tha t the Office of Security had been

involved in the "Ballou case 11 ~ I ~escribed the Ballou case
as follows: The residence of Mr. Ballou, an antique gun collector
in Silver Spring, Maryland, was raided on 7 June 1971 by the Mont-
gomery County Police and some Federal law enforcement officers.
After the officers, dressed in civilian clothes, had forced their way
into the house Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers
immediately opened fire and wounded Ballou seriously. He spent
a long time in the hospital and is partly paralyzed at the present time.
00638
'J
. ...
SIiIA IN+Ef.''''
.: . .... 8P~lY
11"[
His case was given much publicity in the Washington Post at the
time. There was additional publicity in the last several months
when Ballou instigated a lawsuit against the raiding officers.
- - - - 5........... 1 fdentified another student, I I

'-" 1 who was assigned to lAS, as a friend of
.~
----.::Hr;:e.........s..."ta"'t"'e"o:r that I lal s 0 see m e d to know the s pe c"'u..l"c"'s.....--,;o'""t'.t h."e,.....-,B=raI""'I"ou
case.
6. I thanked I ~nd
told him this was just the type
of information we wanted to receive so that it can be investigated
and appropriate action taken if the information is borne out.
7. This office will follow up on this allegation and advise

the Director concerning our findings.
• VY l1I1am v. Droe
Inspector General
- 2 -
00639
(
t
; .
....
." " ..~ . NOf~d

Mr.! !called the Director on~B
16 kay at 3:05 re "activities outside the
Agency" .. I told him DirectOI: was out of the
office~ but we would return his call. Mr .
.! ~ called back that day and said he was
gOlng 0 Fubini lecture and would call us
back. He never did call back. Mr. Colby
.! said to turn over to Mr. Broe .
l \
00640
":: ':" ~. ,. ::- ...... '-;-'•. ::- ..- .
"'_'l..._.-
,.. .
~. .• •
, ....
- • .lI (
,
•... _ .... ~ ~ ,..
( v,U ,f\.k.1
(
-ms--om:t-
00642
D.. U~(I.ASSI FI ED -B {g~fr ( [J AI

SUBJECT: (Optional)
fROM: EXTENSION NO.
Ins pector Gene ral DATI

22 May 1973
TO: (Office, de.ignation, ,oom number, and DATE
building) _ _.,.--_~ OfFICER'S COMMENTS (Numbe, each comment to .how f,om whom
I- INITIALS 10 whom. D,aw a line oC'on column oft., each comment.)
RfOMD fORWARDED
1.
Mr. Wm. E. Colby
2.
The Director
J.
I~.
15.
00643
t .
61 0 u~c:~'t's F-l SECKET R C8f4fIBflUIAL n INTERNAL
lice nUlv n UNClASSIFIED
..-
22 May 1973
THROUGH Mr. William E. COlbW:= e.-----
Mr. Colby advised me thatl lextensionO

had called the Office of the Director m lme With the Director
memorandum to all employees· dated 9 May 1973, requesting all
employees to report activities which might be construed to be out-
side the legislative charter of the Agency.
I ls
employed as a GS-5 clerk in the
Cable secretanat. He Jomea t e Agency in September 1967 and
worked in the Office of Security for 3-1/2 years before transferring
to the Cable Secretariat in 1970.
While in the Office of Security he was as signed to a suppox:t

desk, SD3. The primary function of this desk was tol-:-:-_ _----:- ,------
I During his assignment
to th 1 S a e s k, I Is=u=p=p'"""o,.-;:r""t=e'"""a:r-::::a---=p=r--=o"'"J=e--=c..t en t i t1 e d S R POIN TE R - .
HTLINGUA described the project as follows. The
Office of Secun y had a unit at the JFK Inter-
national Airport that photograp email going to Soviet Bloc countries.
This work was done by Agency staff employees. Themail was placed
in bags by the regular Post Office employees and stacked. After
their departure for the night, the Agency employees would open the
mail and photograph it. Both incoming and outgoing mail, including
postcards, were photographed. A watch list was maintained and
- priority was given to the names listed, but generally all mail was
processed.
The results of the operation were sent to Washington Headquarters

where they were handled byl fIe would receive a teletype
advising him of the registry number and the number of items. He
would check to see if the number of items received was correct and
route the material to the appropriate offices. Generally about 1/4 of
°P644
..
~
-'
v .... ,.
'."
.
.1'
w~ .....
(
• I
the material was separated into bundles bound with rubber bands.
This portion was sent to TSD for technical processing. The remain-
ing material was sent to the CI Staff, 1 _
E
About twice a month the CI Staff would add names to or delete
names from the list. I rou1d send the changes in the list to
the field office. The watch 11st was made up primarily of
I tho were in the United States. Wn~n
lett the vInce or ;:securxty in 1970, the project was still activ
I Iwas in no way emotional or belligerent. He

presented the facts quickly and clearly and said he had no other
information. He stated he would have corne forward with the informa-
tion sooner but he had only recently had time to read the Director's
memorandum. The writer thanked him for his interest.
~/;/
1
~iarn
M« tJ:& V. Broe
Inspector General
- z-
00645
,.
."
6 JUN 1973
THROUGH : Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee
SUBJECT : Alleged CIA Involvement in the Ballou Case
1. By memorandwn dated 25 May 1973, I informed you of the

r.esults of an interview of Mr.! Iwho reported that
Mr. \ I
an employee of the 011lce of Security,. had
stated during a diSCUSSIon period at Advanced Intelligence Seminar
No. 6 in September 1971 that the Office of Security had been involved
in the "Ballou case. " (The residence of Mr. Ballou, 'an antique gun
collector in Silver Spring, Maryland, was raided on 7 June 1971 by
Montgomery County Police and Federal law enforcement officers.
When the officers, dressed in civilian clothes, forced their way into
the house, Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers opened
fire and seriously wounded Bal~ou. He was hospitalized for several
months and was left partially paralyzed. I believe he is now sUing
over the incident. )
We interviewed Mr. 'I

2.. /certain other employees' who
attended the Seminar, and the Duector of Security to determ:ne just
what was said at the Seminar and the extent of any Agency involvement
in the Ballou case. We find that participants i,n the Seminar we1"e
encor::ged tr discuss the details of their work and associated problems.
-Mr. mentioned an assignment he he.d been on with the U. S.
_Secre erVIce at the 1968 National Conventions and his liaison activities
with the Montgomery County Police.
3. I reports that in discussing the latter subject he

related a conversahon he had with Inspectorl pf the Mont-
gomery County Police, sometime in June 1971 after the Ballou incident
had been repc..::-ted in the newspapers. According tol ~he
I I had thanked him for some amplifying equipment the
Agency had gIven to the Montgomery County Police and remarked that
00646'
- .. -- ~
this equipment had probably saved a policeman's life. The inspector

comm.ented that the account of the Ballou incident appearing m
the
press was not the whole story. With the aid of the equipment the
Agency bad provided, the police had intercepted a telephone call
froIn. Ballou to a friend in which Ballou outlined plans to "kill a cop. "
The police then staged a raid to forestall Ballou's plan, and it was
daring this raid that Ballou was shot.
4,I I
said that he has no other knowledge of the Ballou
case, except for what he has rea? in the newspapers, and that he has
not bad any other conversations about the case with any members of
the Montgomery County Police. We learned nothing from our inquiries
that would indicate any other Agency involvem~t in the Ballou case.
5. The following are related excerpts fro=n the "Family Jewels"

submission of the Director of Security on 16 1.1ay 1973:
During the period from 1968 to 1973, several items of

positive audio equipment consisting primarily of clandestine
transmitters and touch-tone dial" recorders were loaned to
the Metropolitan Police Department; Fairfax County, Virginia,
Police Department; Montgomery County, :Maryland, Police
Department; New York City· Police DepartInent; and the Sat).
Francisco, California, Police Department.
On 25 July 1968, and at the specific request of the

United States Secret Service, this Office provided two a·udio
countermeasures technicians to the United States Secret Service
in connection with the Democratic National Convention held in
. Chicago, Illinois. This was not an official detail although
both men were provided with temporary credentials identifying
them as being affiliated with the United States Secret Service.
On 15 August 1968, we detailed the SaIne two men to the

United States Secret Service to cover the Republican National
Convention in Mianli, Florida. On both occasions, the team
members were debriefed upon their retur:::l and it is clear that
their activities were confined exclusively :0 sweeping the
candidate~I and potential candidates I quarters.
William. V. Broe
Inspector General
OIG: (6 June 1973)
Dh trL.t"-u-t"t'-o-n-:-' \
Orig & 1 - Addressee
, "C' c_ ... I rT A
ODbf7
," ('
-4 June 1973
Date
BROE Follow-up interview re Mr.1 Irequest

xxx to see DCI. L.- _
f •
FROM: FPBishop
I. ~Ve
RETUI\N TO:~fileo(~m Interviews held on behalf of DCI re Watergate/Jewels
00648
-..
. . . . _ ....._ .... I ~c:.
~
....... ro: :T'".. _

",' 0,
"
..
. .:.: . :: .'! . 31 ¥ay)973: "' . ,0,:." .• ':.'.
" .' . .:.,' '
• '.... of . : . , . • I • • '.
. ~. ~."
"
, '.1 '.
~
: •• • '0" •••• : :, .' .. ' :
,
." .. ", ',;.' :.:, .
:
.. . . .... . '..' . "...... . .~. ~ . '0·.

• '0 • • .. .:.
.'.~ ....
'. •
' ,
"
. "
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD.
SUBjE~~, I~LvieWWithl ------,-----r;fic~ •.·~.seciirity

1. On 31 May 1973 I questioned about what he I I
had said at the Advanced Intelligence Seminar No. 6 and the extent
and nature of the relations he had had with the Montgomery County
Polic~. He said that he and others had been encouraged to discuss
their work and the problems related thereto with other Seminar
members and told that what they said would pe II non - a ttributable."
In this context he had discussed the Office of Security· 5 relati~s
with local Police Forces including the Police Force in ~~1l:tgomery
County. He said he mentioned the "Ballou Case" as an example
of how ~e Montgomery County Police had used equipment provided
by the Agency in their work, but denied that he had said or implied
that the Agency was lIinvolv~dll in the Ballou case. He said that he
ha:d ' also related to the other Seminar members the fact that the
Agency had provided assistance to the Secret Service in connection
with ~he protection of the,President and Vice President and that he
and others had been detailed to work with the Secret Service on
counter-audio activities at the 1968 Democratic National Convention
in Chicago and the Republican National Convention in Miami. I
.. asked I JWhO was on the Chicago detail, if he was
detailed to protecteVice"President. He said that he was detailed
to Tom Kelly, Deputy Chief of the Secret Service and worked in
effect as a member of the Secret Service under Mr. Kelly.
z.
I questioned I
as to whether his relations withI
. the Montgomery County Police was training oriented, equipment
oriented, or if he had engaged in any operations or activities with
the police. He said his relations with the Police had been entirely
equipment oriented and had been limited to the Chief of Police and
one o~ two senior Inspectors. The extent of assistance given con-
sisted of the Agency providing the Police ~ith surplus technical
00649
'\;.
·r
equipment which was of no further use to the Agency, and

briefing them as to its use. He said he would not define these
briefings as training, but admitted that it might be so construed.
I 3. I said that his only knowledge of the "Ballou

Case", except what he had read in the papers, came from one
telephone conversation he had with Ins pector I pf the
Montgomery County Police sometime after accounts of the Ballou
shooting had appeared in the press. He said the Inspector called
to thank him for some amplifying equipment the Agency had given
the Police and mentioned that it had probably saved the life of a
policeman. He said that the Inspector explained to him that the
account of the incident appearing in the press was not the whole
story, that with the aid of the equipment the Agency had provided
the Police had been able to intercept a telephone call from Ballou
to a friend in which Ballou had outlined plans to "kill a cop. "
The Police had then staged a raid to forestall Ballou's plan and it
was during this raid that Ballou was shot. I Isaid
that he had had no other conversations with the Montgomery
County Police on that subject. He said he had mentioned it at
the Seminar as an example of the sensitivity involved in the
Agency's dealings with domestic Police Forces. He said he
recalled that there was quite a bit of discussion and argument
by the Seminar members about the propriety of the Agency assist-
ing local police forces and working with the Secret Service· in the .
U. S., but that he did not recall any extensive discus sion about the
Ballou Case and that at no time had he said that the AgenCoas
directly involved. I Isaid he remembered that
reemed particularly concerned about the Agency nvo ve-
---=m=-=e-=n&:t--:l'-n::-::dT:omestic activities and that sometime later, around
January or February 1972, I ~alked to Colonel White about his
concern and Colonel White in turn talked to the Director of Security.
Since that date, he said, he has not had any further direct contact
with the Montgomery County Police, based upon orders of the
Director of Security.
:L • :z • DISIIOP
Inspector
Q06SO
. (
31 May 1913
SUBJECT: Interview with l'- IOffice of Security
1. On 31 May 1913 I questioned I labout what he

had said at the Advanced Intelligence Semmar No. 0 nd the extent
and nature of the relations he had had with the Montgomery County
Police. He said that he and others had been encouraged to discuss
their work and the problems related thereto with other Seminar
members and told that what they said would be "non-attributable."
In this context he had discussed the Office of SecuritY'1i relations
with local Police Forces including the Police Force in Montgomery
County. He said he mentioned the "Ballou Case" as an example
of bow the Montgomery County Police had used equipment provided
by the Agency in their work, but denied that he had said or implied
that the Agency was "involved" in the Ballou ca5e~ He said that he
had also related to the other Seminar members the fact that the
Agency had provided assistance to the Secret Service in connection
with the protection of the Pr-esident and Vice President and that he
and others had been detailed to work with the Secret Service on
counter-audio activities at the 1968 Democratic 1'\ational Convention
in Chicago and the Republican National Convention in Miami. I
askedl rho was on the Chicago detail, if he was
detailed to protect the Vice President. He said that he was detailed
to Torn Kelly, Deputy Chief of the Secret Service and worked in
eHect as a member of the Secret Service under Mr. Kelly.
2. I questioned I rs to whether his relations with

the Montgomery County Police was training oriented, equipment
oriented, or if he had engaged in any operations or activities with
the police. He said his relations with the Police had been entirely
equipment oriented and had been limited to the Chief of Police and
one or two senior Inspectors. The extent of assistance given con-
.bted of the Agency providing the Police with surplus technical
00651
(
equipment which was or no further use to the Agency, and

brleting them as to its use. He said he would not define these
briefings as training, but admitted that it might be so construed.
3.1 Isaid that his only knowledge of the "Ballou

Case", except what he had read in the papers, came trom one
te~ephone conversation he had with Inspector I f! the
Montgomery County Police sometime after accounts of the Ballou
.hooting had appeared in the press. He said the Inspector called
to thank him for some amplifying equipment the Agency had g~ven
the Police and mentioned that it had probably saved the Ufe of a
policeman. He s~id that the Inspector explained to him that the
account of the incident appearing in the press was not the whole
Itory, that with the aid of the equipment the Agency had provided
the Police had been able to intercept a tel~phone call from Ballou
to a. friend in which Ballou had outlined plans to ''kill a cop:."
The Police had then staged a. raid to fo'restall Ballou's plan and it
was duritig this raid that Ballou was shot. I Isaid
that he had had no other conversations with the Montgomery
County Police on that subject. He said he had mentioned it at
the Seminar as an example of the sensitivity involved in the
Agency's dealings with domestic Police Forces. He said he
recalled that there was quite a. bit of discussion and argument
by the Seminar members ,about the propriety of the Agency assist...
ing local police forces and working with the Secret Service in the
U.S., but that he did not recall any extensive discu88ion about the
Ballou Case and that at no time had he said that the Agency was
directly involved. I lsaid he remembered that I I
~eemed parUCUIClrly cdncerned about the Agency~ve...
'---m"""""""'e""'-n-rt-iri"""""'--:a..-Jomestic activities and that sometime later, around
. January or February 1972,1 ltalked to Colonel White about his
concern and Colonel White in turn talked to the Director of Security.
Since that date, he said, he has not had any further direct contact
with the Montgomery County Police, b~LSed upon orders of the
Director of Security.
F. P. Bishop
Inspector
... 2 ... 00652

(
31 May 1973
SUBJECT: Interview Withl IFMSAC
I. r Isaid he recalledl talking I

about the 0 fice of Secunty's liaison with the Police Forces in
the Metropolitan Area and that the Ballou case was mentioned.
He also recalled that I Ihad mentioned that the Agency
had provided assistance to the Secret Service in connection with
surveillance work against radical groups at the 1968 Democratic
National Convention in Chicago.' He said that he could not re-
member exactly what[ Isaid, but he did recall that
there was considerable dlSCUSSlon and debate among the class
members about the propriety of the Agency engaging in such
activities.
_ _ _ _~~2..!...-----'L~ater in January or February 1972, at a time when

Iwas Chairman of the Management Advisory Group
---r(MArT"7r7"'G.,)',----.::hc-::e~s--=a~ld he discussed these matters, and questioned the
extent to which the Agency should become involved in domestic
intelligence activities, with Colonel White and later with Mr.
Colby. The MAG also raised the general problem in a couple of
their papers, but without citing specific detailed-examples. He
said he understood that Colonel White had taken the matter up
with the Director of Security and that some changes had been
made as a result.
I p
..,..J:--:.,-----,Z-.::----,DrTT!"'-:5TlJITlU.-riI
Orig - File w j'---- ~terview
00653
CIA I"IT:: .,~.' ~!
I a cr.( . .
I "._ e,,_1
O'I"
(
29 May 1973
SUBJECT: Possible Agency Involvement in Outside Activities

on BaSiS of InIo~mation Provided b~,---- _
I
On 29 May 1973 I talked to Mr. who
was a clas·smate o f l l a n d at the Advanced
Intelligence Semina~hel on - ep ern er 1971. Mr.1
said that each student was asked to describe and talk about his'--w-o-r--.k;-----J
in the Agency and he recalled that Mr.1 lhad talked about the
Office of Security's liaison with, and ass1stance given to and received
from, the Police Departments in the· Washington Metropolitan area.
He said he could not recall specifically what was said, but to the best of
his memory Mr. I I d e s c r i b e d training given to either the Prince
George's or Mont~CountyPolice concerning surveillance methods
and electronic techniques. He 'said that he did not recall any discussion
of the "Ballou case" and that he had no knowledge of that case other
than what he had read in the newspapers.
00654
....... , ....
~ (
\ .-J..J _
----
30 --~~ 1S:7J
_': .... --""\

-J~
7'::""":,·
-.J ..I _ •
~ t:-l::ed ~'"it:; ~:r. CGb::rne or; :(', :'~ay cl:Ol....t ~:'r •

.--- .1...---,-_ _----'
stQ"ts:',,::nts CCn<~C'~;"'l: r?:~l:s Y":'='c~.e b:," . ~-:.I j.t -::·.e
'-------~
:;:-' ·.. .t 10"7'l

a-·e.,:..... ~. {..:... "
_ -t.- •
hc:d reI: tions 'Ii.t': t:,c locc.l :x'lice f'orces in t::e ::Gtro::,o:titiccn
~·~-h';"'r"\C-+
·,c..'::>o.o..=·u",on _.•.r.,..-.
pro '\n..... ,.~ ~1I0'!"'\
""'""'\n __
'" ,0,=' '.0.... ....+",eo·.l.\.,0 t~-("
. __ -'~T
J,~_ ··r.. ~"'··L·'''''-
l.°n :l.-,.~ _~:.:. _........T~-.~It-
~ •• t. ,,=,
CC;-':,11C'ction ~ lit:·. :.:.. . ::: cc- S8.

_. ..,
~-
~ ~;:;- t f· ct~! CClUr": l'j,'0:l ::il'l, ~:·_:t t:::- t h:; =.1::;0 1:1t ;,::(',~:~
~.r. c=Jl ter :1:U;S21f. ::8 rc,p.r::oc 't.h:.t ::r.I I·.I=:-s C'_ vel:-
;:000 cricfer, :",'...:t i~clincd to be ov,"'r-e;"'??:1sive 2.t tines 2.!:r:; t,lk

to Trmch.
- ..... -~·'5·.:°1)
' ..
25 May 1973
.-'
THROUGH : Mr. William E. Colby
1. On 17 May the nazne oIl }a.

referred to this office as having attempted to contact the Director
concerning "activities outside the Agency." I attempted to contact
Ion 2.1 and 22. May, but he walS on leave. On 23 May
-----.b-e::--""':,.:-ita...,...,t-e--.a'h'e- wa.nted to check a portion of his information and asked
if he could come to my office on 24 May.
2. carne into the A~ency as a JOT

in October an s current y aeigned
to the S ovle tIE ESe cti on. !---=a-:v=e=r=y'--s:::-r::r=o=-=n=-g=-=pe=-:::-:r=-s=-o=-n=n-=-"e til e.
3. r !advised that in August 1911 he attended the

Advanced Intelligence Seminar. On the first evening of the eeminar
the students had a "getting acquainted tl session where each ono
gave a brief description of his duties. One of the students~ I
I 1of the Office of Security, however, carried on
alter the session was over and expanded on the briefing he.had given. L..- _
He claimed that CIA was coo~rating with the Montgomery County

Police, stating that the Office of Security gave electronic and other
support to that organization.
4. He further indicated that the Office of Security had been

Involved in the "Ballou case".J Ide scribed the Ballou case
as follows: The residence o f r . Ballou, an antique gun collector
in Silver Spring, Maryland, was raided on 7 June 1971 by the Mont-
gomery County Police and some Federal law enforcement officers.
Alter the officers, dressed in civilian clothes, had forced their way
into the house Ballou picked up an antique pistol. The officers
immediately opened fire and wounded Ballou seriously. He spent
a long time in the hospital and is partly paralyzed at the present time.
OOGSG
Ht.. cue wa. given much publicity in the Washington ~ at the
time. There was additional publicity in the l~t several months
when Ballou tnaUgated a lawsuit again~t the ra..iding officera •
~denti!ied
.---------""5'-"-1
1
0
L...,.;n"'.e. . . .l1. .....t"""a....-te,..,...--
:
another student,
woo was asatgned t o O as a friend
that
arTI lr
&1. 0 seemed to know the .II peC':nU<Tl=C=s---'o=fr-rthl:"""e~B~il"""'l ou
case.
6. t thankedl ~d told hhn thia was just the type

of inlormation we wanted to receive so that it can be investigated
and appropriate action taken if the information is borne out.
7. Thb oHIce will follow up on this' allegation and advise

tb. Director concerninaour finding ••
WilHam V. Broe
In.pector General
-2-
00657
( INTELLI~ENCE SEol1INAR 'N ... (- ,;
~ :-~¥ ~;vrt ?/
List of Students
. ",
....
. -..
lla:me 'Office Room No. Extension
1/
'-
,..'
00658
-~_._- . . . '7' .-- - ..-;-·

~ .-:t-.~-:- _.- -~
- 0.
- .- -.",,-,. ._. -- - _.. _---....~; ...----
.. _._-;---....-
, ..
(
(
,--
MEMORANiJUM FOR: f\ ve.
o~ \ ~ i ""bl 0 (.- llk.~~

~.:\Q... "'~JLd. "'h~. C ~A~~(~""",
""\ M -t. Gu\ ~1. UJa.. w..~k It-<.

~,' Q..~ ~J \! ~ilr.....J. l~
o~l ~ i"\~'
-tN~ ~~~
b::> l
~--=-e:-o--..--n,..----",,----_----.J
I
\.~ ~G- (1.>

(DATE)
006
fOR ... NO. 10 I R(PL"'C(S 10·101
fOR ... 1471
1 AU G 54 WHICH ...... Y B( US(O.
~
'1'.
:
- '(-' (.
"
5317 Briley Place, N. W.

Washingt~n, D. C. 20016
29 Fcbruary 1972 .
Mr. Lloyd Shcarer

Editor-at- Large
Paradc :M:agazine
140 N. Hamilton Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90211
Dear Mr. Shearer:
Thank you for your lettcr of February 7, 1972, and its

kind words about me. As you can itnaglnc, your chzllcnge sct
me to work to meet it. As a result I can say, under oath if
need be, that CIA has never carried out a polit.ical assassin.?tion,
nor has it induced, cmploycd or suggested one which occurred.
Whether this fully n1.eets your challenge, I cannot t:CiY (it tak.~s
two to tango), but it is a long way from the 'original staten'~~nt in
Mr. Scott1s coluIT.n that CIA "uses politicc;.l assassb2tion as a
weapon." Perhaps 1 am too sensitive, but I would hope y01.1 coulci
set the record straight for your readers. .
Sincercly,
00660
I'
Parade Pilblication.5. Inc. + OL j -207J
. . LLOYD SHEARER
/.60 N.IJamilton Drive
Bet/trlll Hilb, Calif. 90211
Edil.r-d·!Aryc
r,:
;
February 7, 197 2 i:
.-'
, . Mr. W.E. Colby

·',..
f
i
5317 Briley P.l. ·
Washington, D.C. 20016
Dear i1r! Colby\' "
Thank you ror your kind and informative letter,of

January 11 concerning Operation Phoenix.
•
~,
.1 I doni t want to get into a running word- ba tt.Le 1':i th
( ,
you on the subject of political assassination in Indo-China I,
or the role of CIA and other of our agencies in Operation

"
Phoenix.
.I
;
I am just ~ondering of you would care to say flatly
• I that the CIA has never' used political assassination in
Indo-Chin~ or elsewhere and has never induced, employed, or
. ~uggested to others that such tactics or devices be employed •

',
.:
... i
I If you :wil.l make that flat staterr.ent und.er oeth. I ":111
,
.... -- not only apologize. I will tango With Dick He,tms in
..
,",
"
.. I
Garfinckel l s largest ShOl~ vlindo\'l at 14th end F--providing,
of course, Mrs. Helms gives her permission •
."
';
Again, I thank you for your interest and cO~Qend you
0. for the really outstanding service you have rendered the
country. You are indeed one of Helms' finest •
.,
,~
uectf~Y'
, &1J~~(h.~
LLO D SHEARER 00661
( (-
.t·
."
I· S'::NDER WILL CHECK CL·...S 'CATION TOP AND BOTTOM

..··, .........
(;:'\CL:',SS;n:m I I ,-,J~F:DE~TjAL "I S··~
"- r ......... I\ r'#'"
OFFICIAL HOUTI1\'G SL1P
1
TIcT
.~
2
11)'V("J ..- F«r
...
~/,1\
3 V
_A \- T~ Ue. rJ.up. ~ I
•
4 I
~
5
6
L~
ACTION DIRECT REPLY P~EP":l~ llEPLY
APJ>ROY.\l DI5P.\TCH P'~CI)Mr.i~:iD.\ TlON
COH~:!iT FILE RETUR~
COHCUIIREHCE INfORMATION SIG1UTURE
r,.
Remarks:
-I ~A~.J. ure - I
fk . CJZo G~
M ~
~
.
F
-
FROM: t DATE
:E~ccl:~i"l[! LL:"·~·~.Jl· 4 1.!.;Y i:i2

I U:--iCLAS51FIED I I CO:'iFlDE~,TL\L 1 SECHJ-:T
(,(0)
Uu previoul editionl
fOUl N!).
1-67 237
d0662
.. _-_.~~ ~- ........
I:i. ~ ... ~
.., . M
r..t:J.
,., ~
1:
C
Q
.f"
-- _.------ . ----_._--------
L-------- .,
.' ...\"'~~J'
~~:~'.·J;\~\+r."·mf::.;':"7'.\":"'.'~'''''
,\,.Y 0.; .l-'~" ,',r\', . . 1' ....
":£Jt"
· ~'-:':' • :',;:,. '::...
, ,,'" !/ ~,·r ../
I. 1i··Y
r...
... ",', ..../:,.:• .,;..:..
,,.t
.• \II'" '\2'r.·•.
:r:=r....eu.-a,.a:DE ..J •
• r. '.' vI
.. . t,. _ --<1 1-'.·.',
,,;'_:J,.L,tL~"'·
"'(i:j,"II.,1;;'-' .t·.' .....I~ •
·r:
~I'l Q
H 0 Nort11 l1amilton DriPO
Bmr/II Hm•• C~Ii/,
t
"'f'
• ,., r ..- ;.
/LV
• •. ' • '<.
••. ' I
'I.....
"....-.
~ ','V'\'
c. _
,"\1
;lo..~." y
.~..
..' ' '
•
..\'~.Io
'.:r
".
'
-.
~"f
, . . . '• •
'c-1~.:: ';::~~:: r. .•• 'Ii;". \ ..,

• ::, ~·:.. ·;":;.j;.:r:~\~
· I .' :/,. ,;.
.. ~, f(P.·>~l\'.'- ~ 1:
.-:
It,' '~'~-', 1='
J\~J
· .. ~" ,.J~'Qi'I\_"
· .: • ~l .J .• :........... > :"'!,;I' I g'
· . . . t- ~', t, ~ ,
K.
.. ··s:::·~;.:;r~·
•• t"~.;'"
.
.1« "i 1/ J.\.'~'" ~. ;·,I",7:i·
I
... " I'~
.j" I .
a'
~.
.
, ••
Mr. W. E. Colby •'--"'-'-"._ :. ._....r ~__L.:....._._

...:....-. ....- .. _• '0'
i ' .. .•..~ .a .•
........l
~ '. COLBY I KOMER & HELl1S .- ~
'
/.... ..... /",( " ....

5317 Briley Place, N.W. "i I-I ..' ~'I'. ~
".t'. f!(,
.";-. . .'ce.,"
,r •
!!' ~::~
I •
' I i.. !....'·

• ", .
\) \. ~;.,,~... .~-
.j'1-'
Washin~ton D.C. 20016 , .,.,. \. ••)ll.,)} \ " ,.,

.........
lD "'f.J;-· If'- • f, .
~ \':\..,,:\
-~~.r.(.~r
""'J (
I· . .-"'.;1'"
'" ...
:
'.
.,
#
Parade Publications. I.u. • OL 3-2013

J ~O N. l/amillo7t Ddre
llOYD SHEARER Bnerlll Hills. Colif. 90211
E4ill1T-al·LaTI11
April 30, 1972
Dear General Col~y:
(1) Thank you for your article, "Should Lesbians Be

To Play Professional Football'}" I found it intrirruintr.
Al1o~'ied
and we plan to run it in a future issue under your by-line, of
course.
(2) Thank you for arranain~ ~ tan~o with me and Dick
Helms of Her Majesty's Tel Aviv Rifles. Even At Williams,
Dick \'laS one of the great tan.cro-irtlsts of our time. Garfinkels,:
Woodrop-Lathrop, even Hechts---in fact, any place and time of
your choosin~ is O.K. with me.
(J) One sad notel Will you tell An~us we cannot use
his ne"l car bumper sticker: LICK DICK in 1172, because it is
,open to misinterpretation. In addition, wa try to remain
politically neutral. ~
(4) As to your willin~ncss to say under oath tha~ the

CIA has never been party to political assassination, I, of
late, have beentravelLln~a good deal. In the course of my
travels r happened to encounter OleO' Penkovsky--not your
01ea:--- but Penkovsky, a bartender, in Cleveland ,··Ohio.
Penkovsky told me tha~ you signe~a secrecy a~~eement, For~
270, lIii tnessed by Victor L. Earchetti. Under the terms of
this as:rree;nent you are pled~ed to eternal silence concerninrr
CIA activities. Unless you have a special Papal dispensation---
the kind S<':i ven Allen Du LIes and Lyman Kirkpatriclr. Jr., it seems
to me you are lip-sealed.
Perhaps this does not apply to hearln~s before
the Senate Forei~n Relations Co~cittee or the prestiaious
Council o,'~ Foreicm Relations. If this is so, please let me
know; and we will take it from there.
(5) ,I will be in Washln~ton
shortly stayinlT at the
.
home of Jack Anderson out in Silver SprinP:'. Perhs.ps '\'~e can
meet there for a. scalI SUI!l!Ili t. I 'Nil1 have l'l1 th me severEd
former Green Beret oembers who want to discuss with you
the subject of CIA ioposters in South Vietnam, who lied to
them and me, too.
Let me hear frvw you. Allnthe best,
~\( ) ~ 00664
.
..... t ..
.. .' ~
5317 Briley Place, N. W.

, . Washington, D. C. Z0016
7..9 February 1972
Mr. Lloyd Shearer'

Editor-at-Large
Parade Magazine
140 N. Hamilton Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90211
Dear Mr. Shearer.
Thank you for your letter of February 7, 1972, and ita

kind words about me. As you can iInagine, your challenge set
me to work to D"lCet it. As a result I can say, under oath if
need be, that CIA has never carried out a political <ls5assin<:'.t~on,
nor has it induced, employed or .suggested one which occurred.
Whether this fully meets your challenge, I cannot say (it tak(:1J
two to tango), but it is a long way from the orieinal statement in
Mr. Scott's column that Cl!\ "uses political assassination ns a
weapon." Perhaps I am too sensitive, but I would hope you could
set the record straight for your reade rB.
Sincerely,
w. E. Colby
00665
( (~
" .. . ...
, "
Parade Publications. Inc. • OL 3-2073

HO N. Hamilton Dri,'e
Be'Dcrl'll Hilb. Calif. SOlll
LLOYD SHEARER
EdiJor-al·1Arge
February 7, 1972
Mr. W.E. Colby

.5317 Briley Pl.
Washington, D.C. 20016
Dear Hr. ColbyY
Thank you for your kind and informative letter of

January 11 concerning Operation Phoenix.
I don t t "'ant to get into a running word-battle 'Ni th,
you on the subject of political assassination in Indo-China
or the role of' CIA and other of our agencies in Operation
Phoenix.
I am just ~onderin5 ~f you would care to say flatly
that the CIA has never used political assassination in
Indo-China or elsewhere and has never induced', employed, or
~uggested to others that such tactics or devices be employed.
If you \>1111 make that flat statement under oath, I will
not only apo'Logize, I will tango with Dick Hel~s in
Garfinckel t s largest show rlindol'l at 14th and F--providing,
of course, l'irs. Helms gives her permission.
Agcin, I thank you for your 1~terest and commend you
for the really outstanding service you have rendered 'the
country. You are indeed one of Helms' finest.
00666
, , . ' -..
.,
( .., .
5317 Briley Place

j 'Vn8hington, D. C. 20016
January 11, 197Z
Mr. Lloyd Shcarer

Editor at Large
Parade Maga2.inc
733 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10017
Dear Mr. Shearert
In your i6Clue of Jan~ry 9th. one oE 'Walter Scott's Person.ality Parade

resp0:lses 6tated that CIA I~es political assa£Gination ao a weapon" and
that Operation Phoonix "run by the CIA cttabliah.3d a new high for U. S.
political as Dll8Dinationc in Vietnam. I: Since I b1:vC beld res ponsible position,
in CIA for many years and was also (during <1et.&lched service from CU.. ) rc-
.ponoible for U. S. GUP?orl to Opcration Phoenix, I beliove I am uniquely'
qualified to teotify (as I h!lve in public Gcssion under oath to Senate and House
Committees) that:
a. CIA does net nnd has not used political as:!:lfisination as a.

wCZlpon.
b. Opel'ation Phoenix was run not by the CIA but by tha Govern-
ment of Victn~m,with the liupport of the CORDS clement of the U. S.
Military Assistance Com..'TInnd in coordination with scveral U. S.
agencies including CIA.' .
c. Qpc,-ation Phoenix 10 not llnd was not a progrnm of aGBilGaiiU-
tion. It countcred the Viet Cong apparatus attempting to overthrow
the Goverruneut of Vietnam by targetttng its leadera. Wherever pos-
sIble, these were apprehended or invited to defe-ct, b\~t a 8ubstantid
number were killed in iirefightn during military operatio:ls or re-
dding capture. There fa a vast difference in kind. not merely in
degree, between thc:le cornbat casualties, (even including the few
abusee which oceun-cd) and the victims of the Viet Gong's sYGtcmatic
camJhlign of terrorism to which Mr. Scott quito accurutely referred.
In order to c..~!"lfy this important quasH,,-.l to the millions of concerned

Americana who read Pi\r~.de, I should appreciate your publishing thio :lcttcr.
Sinceroly, rl
lsi w. E. Colby
W. E. Colby
WEC:blp
• Distribution: 00667
Orip. - AddTPRRPH t - ~ 1 - ExDiT 1 - Mr. "ThUei'ffie~
1 - William Sullivan (I[ Stafe (via SA VA - 12 Janl 1 - Colonel Farnham !osn /TS:'·
'.
"
5317 Briley Place

Washington, D. C. 20016
January 11, 1972
Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
.' Dear Mr. Shearer:
In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality Parade

rcsponses stated that CIA "uses political assassination as a weapon" and
that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new high for U. S.
political assass ina~ions in Vietnam." Since I haye held rcs ponsible, positions
in CIA for many years and was also (during detached service from CIA) re-
sponsible for U. S. supp,ort to Operation Phoenix, I believc I am uniquely
qualified to testify {as I have in public session under oath to Senate and HOWle
Committees} that:
a. CIA does not and has not used political assassination as a

weapon.
b. Operation Phoenix was run not by the CIA but by the Govcrn-
ment of Vietnam, with the support of the CORDSelcITlcnt of the U. S.
Milit.lry Assistancc Cor,nmand in coordination with several U. s.
agencies including CIA.
c. Operation Phoenix is not and was not a prograITl of assasBina-
tion. It countered the Viet Cong apparatus attempting to overthrow
the Government of VictnaITl by targctting its leaders. Wherever pos-
sible, thee c were apprehended or invited to defect, but a subctantial
number were killed in firefights during military operations or re-
sisting capture. Therc is a vast difference in kind, not merely in
degree, between these combat casualties (even including the few
abuB es which occurred) and the victims of the Viet Cong's systematic
campaign of terrorism to which Mr. Scott quite accurately referred.
In order tv clarify this important question to the millions of concerncQ.

AInericans who read Parade, I should appreciate your publiehing thi,a letter.
Sincercly,
00668
( que~Il'(/. VOlume 01 , /I /"'It:IV~'U 1I"1~l::. PC D I)lI.U ''-'l·.III\.':- 1 ;'. , .,
: " ~ . \ ·ri.~ ~
'.'l~~:""
. I " -:
. I j . .'
.., ,
'\:
, Q, rour yC',1fS ,11:0 .1Crre~s -....----.......... ":". '. { .'.
•\ \
" . I 1\"\ P ;',1· :'., • '
" " , \ /" \.1 i i'i ,'.' j'l ' ..
.'. I Neely L,lm,lff h.ul a m.m 1 " . \ d, r I ·I· t \.! \ "
(!/ j Wf{ {!~,I\ ~~;::(: .
I. , I ii.mwd nOll,l'd Myth jai14'd .... ,.. ! I \l)i ,.
(01 ,1tll'lII}'lC'dI,lpe. lie ..
;
~
fr .\
r·
,p .\1
!i(,,:.!··.· ;
L' l( '1) :I')J"; i~,,': . "
cI.limC'c/ .'1 'Ile ,ime Ih,;tt
." ....
~.
.1
:". ~)l' I rld'l( .i/: , !!:. il~/"'.
_ ,.,.;,'
I troy Iwl ;nvitC'c/ Ilim 10
.~tl\,'t\1
•. J
\
.... ..;........-. 'I' J\
. .r· ., 'II ',I •
SI,.l/(, hl'l /Jeri. \'\'h,11 ~N r . ., .:,' .. 1\ ~I~I \ \ ' . :.1' :
.~ ; .: .',' ..
hJppeoC'd to th.lt c.15el- . . :I .
:~
,--."
\ .~ll·I'\,I,/,.j·I·I:1
,
,. ·t I. J"" . , I)""\;'1"':
I
I., ! 'l/I'! I' '
\r'
I' ~ 'I'. ,. 1
D.!., 1uMJOck, Tex. ~ 1\. \,: :.
,,:;. I ., I,1',.).
i·.'i'
.,' lpairman (or thc los An&dcs
. the ch.u~e .,nd sued Hcdy
., \
;~ '."~. '.~.-::;..?!.~,
:'
I
'i' \')
r .
1/ 1
'/'\ .}J( J'/ i I' ,./I:! i U,. '.( ':
,"
.
.'l' "\, 'j'"I',"",". \. .:\',' \', :

'1.(
.1. \
I',:.' '"
g that she hOld willing!)' ac-

, vcral weeks :Igo Miss lamur I
. ~ '
'..\.~.,
';'
\ ...... 1
/
,~ ~.-
'.!, ..
.... ~., ..
),\I 'JI!.'l/ . ~ II '(' '(; '!',~. '
t - 'J • l
1I
I
\'1
" \ ;i /' .1I '1
\'"
0
I
,
I
· I" '. f'
I"..(jl',ill,.d:U/
f • ,,0 I • ' 0 •
ACTOR mNrST 1l0RGNlNE WITH HIS FOURTH WIFE.

urI 10 answer Blyth's charses,
-de red her to pay him $15,000 Q. How m<lny limes h<ls aclor Ernesl Borgnine been
I t ~.','I . .. "i ',:.;:\,'"
.I, r 1,:\ I
... i, .
:1·:;
;',
J ,:. r.'l:,.. .
;1';1\" :\\I"il/'/~'I" (\~i'I\' 't \:t?\:
Ienouncing him as a rapist mallied, and is h~ a wife·beate/?-f,T.R., Splingfield,
i . ll", '.
aid 01 girls and marriage?-
Mass.
A. Borgnine has been married four limes. His last'
.,I)i\.' .\.' :"F.r. I.:I~I\\"i ",~I,,: ,,{ \: '. .'
0.; ~ l:. . \j'
.. 11,4/ ,,1' ," J'•• ' '
'-, C. wife, Donna, has chillgcd him with beating her, ~s '·rlt: '\ ~ 'J· ... !.d \ \. j ~ . .
Iy 100 engrossed in his work. 11.\ IJ
'1'1' ",., t,0' "·1,:,. i~ i ~~ ,
• •..•• I •
. I' . \.,.
seeking a divorce. ,'H\.1
... ·,
h j
• . . 11:,:.!',.' ,; I,. . i ,... . ~
r
I 'oJ' \ i
t
~
,
~ i')' if' '! Ii;:' "" ! '

'. !-lope and docs he stitl 1001
Chicago, 111. .
' Q. Is there any af,ency 01 the U.s. Govemment whiJh
has bc;cn aulhorized to include political assassinalion •
.- J,I', 'I'\"',, J , '\ \ '.
'r' '11 . \ .. :
:I:!: i "
t·: )) } .
I .t"
I ••
\I " . I" ,I.,.

I, '•. : ," .
n in Eltham, Ensland, on July in its p/aclices?-M. Witso.n, Austin, Tex. - \., 1/ '1'1""1),1',1
"'.~! .ii\,f.;"'I\:,; .. :I'·~.'
"1. \' I . '. ,
It his lesl (or living it up. A:The one U.S. "hcncy ""hich uses political assassi· ..'., 'I 1···. ", 1,:'11,'·1,
'an ;s one w;lh whom you on

".
nation as a we,'pon is the Central Intelligence
Agency. Many of its men 'in Vietnam have assassi-
r }.j. ,1.:,(/"...:[:'·!'.'(·Il::.j:,.~
t
:' (. . 111 :' " I.,' i' I\ i .\ / \ j ,; .
,.
'ke," Who said' thall-Louise n;'lled civilian Communists in an effort to destroy the ·( 11 I
.' II .\:;.'
"'" \.I. i~"
II' • ( I
'1\
I ,,1/,
..! I.:' ' .
\ :.I'I\I'.~ i I:·.i ',;
ji·V ii,
ii, - Vietcong infrastruclure. Operation Phoenix run by
lalery, the CIA established a new high for U.S. political
"'("
1,.I '1·l r"1';.
.{:\ \ \', J
\: \' ,"'i i
,1 I.' \ .
1
I,),!
".,
I
"
assassinations in Vietnam. largely in response to I' : I {: :. I ' ;(,: '. ',: .

enemy terrorist tactics which also include assassina-
.;I., .\\ I I. !,'! ;., ..... •.'\":." I ~.': II'
tion, kidnapping. tcrro;ism of all sort.s.

.l:l. t,\'•. /-:',I/'! !I.tt!,ll"'··'
! ' : '.' ,", ,'. /.
I' ( '. I ,1/': ,\' i ': ".
1 I",: ~ I .,\
• \: 'Ii \.' 1:." .. ,"" . ,.,: •"
./ Q. Does Richard Nixon ,. I '. ' t "'(":0'

· . I . .1"..1;. \ II '1
;"'1' \ .•
I •. : '
•
"
have his o\;"n plivate golf r:-~" (, ,...I ' t:';1 .!,"..fJ,\
~ ."
(. II l :.
"\1:' I:: ,."
: ,I J '. , . ' ,
I .
I.
.' course at Key Biscayne?- I . ( . '. \ .··r I '. ': I , II j,
",1 .. : 0I / \ j' t l' \ .,/,.\ •• ' • I
Emma R.eynolds, Orlando, \l/n l'~ 'j 'i (/1' il\:::: .
Fla. '. I", ,., ,) I I.' 'j .. , r .
..i,_,-' ... "': '//1
•. "{ I .),.1 I. i'\ ., :,'.
,/ .. \' \. '. ri' \ ..
A. Not at Key Biscayne. He I. ' 't, i '. ~ ~.
I \
.. .....
" 'owns a six-hole pilch-and- ·\l\. I • .;.
i li, ,\. I rII '. I, 't(' \: i ':. .

'j, , '1"'1 ' i I ') '~i'l
,. \ I ; \ I
:. ;:. :
:
pUll coulse on his San IIi I 'i'~'/;

I AND RICHARD BURTON.
Clemente, Calif.. estate.
)I( !\ ,
..\.
J .,1', I"'.'. I .. I'.'I
II \.1'r ••.•
.:. . I;'> \::'1,\ l,t"
tl,./",·
hl!:i!
I ;. ':' •
.. '-' . Q. How long docs it take

I",
, I" ": ' I'";'''
\,• II I .,....
., •• ' ." / ' .
. )1 '.l·t '
In wear lifts in his shoes? And
.1.'/.. ~ /, I I', 1\ !' I \: :,' rI":)1\ ,;"..
;.. ~
\
~ :"....
.~: .'
rth Taylol, rute the roost?- ladioaclive falfoul from . I , 1 i .\ ,"
.,..
I· f,.i .:. : I :
"fe, Atiz. Chinese nuclear lests to ..1\,)

II
j WI'}i't l ):!:::.\.;!:".,.,.
"11 I ' \,; \
f.'(' I ••• " , .
lifts to make him taller. Y<?S, leach tile US.?-M.lIk I ., ! 1'/ '
·I·t
" " .,... •
hots in the (amily. Of ·the two Cheseboro, Balstow, Calif. 1·•'1I " 11'/'/"\11.(,"'\'"
\'(',. f '.. (",.1- . ,..
.' . I ' I JII '.\
I ; jl.1 '\ . • ,.. I '-' .
..••
, I .. I"
, ' Jer and more responsible. It is A. Approximalely three t' I I'I! "J"i ,,,.' [,
~ ::-'. :~,~.... Ildrl,ltl'I~J,::,.lI·Ii'~:·
( 01,\ J 1:) I l
: scripts they do, which may days depending on the f" /iii;":
. ' .~
, S o( recent nops. wind. '\'l}:, ,11'.\''. ('I'\'~;"
'\., J..r:, !:;.,.Ii i...:,
'.' ...
" .. '
,I..',I,.
I .
il,; 11' I" :'," ~ , . \ I :
.,:- ....:.- ''',
., ,.', '"'1 ,f..'. \.,' I ."
,..'. I',/ \:.
, '1
.. ,
I "
I
.
.
.I. Ii ) \"j
:
; Ii;,'
.:: '..::.\:....• ~sldenl, DANIEL D. KINLEY
..• ,. Dr, CAMPBElL GUSLIN
fdilor. JESS GORKIN
s~njot r<lilor, DAVID PALEY
publisher. WARUN J. REYNOLDS .
\. J\\~ \',. i' \'''I~l j.:'\ t·! ~'j. ;:
. " ", I" '.\..; II': I ! .

. "} It '. '. r)'
'.\."i.I~::"j:.;,Ji I'.:.'
,... '/ I ,I
,
,
.'
auoci~le ed'lol'5. LINDA GUTSTDN, HERDERT IWPHRBERG, MARTIN MARGULIES, JOHN C. ROGERS
art ~ssoci3te. At TitOlANI
'. 'Ii 'J: \ III'./I,•'. , /'' ! ,'/"1'\ .:,. . .
, I, ;1'//
'.t ) ., . ,."'..
I'"
-' '.
) f. MILKUHN
I asslsUnts. MARY UOOOROWStI, SUZANNE CURLEY, DORIS SCHOPTMAN
• .,I," . . . , '
:1'J'!\·Ii.Q.O,6~\·/.'
I
~. DEMETRIA TI.nOll f~n, VIRGINIA POPE urtoon c.-dilor. LA\~lt£NCf LAIIAR ,\';.J•i ;,',: .:/,'; ./ : J • I ,. " )
: ( 'I;
I BWMrt,THAL, OP/.l GINN f:' I t·\ ,- .-.'
J: '.
(
.'
..
5317 Briley PIa ce
January 11, 1972
Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at l...arge
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
Dear lvir. Shearer:
In your issue of January 9th, one of Vlalter Scott's Persona~1tv Parade

responses stated that CIA "uses politi~al assassination as a weapon" and
that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA esta blis hed a new high for U. S.
political assassinations in VietnaITl. II Since I have held responsible positions
"
in CIA for many years and \vas also (during detached service frOIn CIA) re- ,
sponsible for U. S. support to Operation Phoenix, I believe I aITl uniquely.
qualified to testify (as I have in public session under oath to Senate and House
Com.rnittees) that:
a. CIA does not and has not used political assassination as a

weapon.
b. Operation Phoenix ·'I,\'as run not by the CIA but by the Govern-
.i
ment of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS element of the U. s.
Military Assistance Conunand in coordination with several U. S.
agencies including CIA.
c. Operation Phoenix is not and was not a prograITlof assassina-

tion. It countered the Viet Cong app,natus attem)2ting to overthrow
"=-:::-,~'_T'='1~ -r (1 r-(1 ~' ) ~I l . t.
/1 ' • Ii
l.J'
the Governn1ent of Vietnam l5\toy n-01!:,i;.chC)'d~. ~_:;Q~ect~~ its leaders. .'l.J'-.L,"t II
tt.A-~.f. -.1"'... . J ~
...sQB:..:....~fre.e.e. were killed in firefights during military operations or

(J . . . .
I
.'
.MV resisting capture. There is a vast difference in kind, not ITlerely in ~

~)
.L
degree, between these cOInbat casualti es (even including the few I
abuses which occurred) and the victims of the Viet Cong1s systematic
~~/ campaign of terrorism to which Mr. Scott quite accurately r~ferred.
Cl....-
:...[J In order to clarify this important questi.n to the millions of conc~rned

Americans who r~ad Parade, I should appreciate your publishing this letter.
Sincerely,
kA
b .fC~~..-----
c- \1 __
.__(() ==
w. :~. Colby
OOG7!}
"
.'
5317 Briley Place
January 10, 1972
Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
Dear Mr. Shearer:
In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's Personality

Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political assassination as a
weapon" and that Operation Phoenix 'lrun by the CIA established a new
high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam. II Since I have held
responsible positions in CIA for many years and was also (during de-
tached service !rOln CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation
Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public
session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that:
a. CIA .does not and has not used political assassination as

a weapon.
b. Operation Phoeni-x was run not by the CIA but by the

Government of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS element
of the U. S. Military Assistance Command in coordination with
several U. ~. agencie's including CIA.
. c. Operation.., Phoenix is not and was not a Pfogram of

as sassination:-but::...rather ~endeavPL~o counte<the Viet Cong
apparatus lea-d-in-g::-t-he attempt;to overthrow the Govcrmnent of
Vietnam by apprehending or defecting its :r1ernbe.rs.. ..'
Some of
these were killed in firefights during military operations or re-
. sisting capture. There .is a vast difference in kind, not merely ~ ........
/) n °,/ldegree, between these comb~t c~sualties (even including °L, .• ~o_:- ,)_"'ou
~~}.occa sionaL.:.:...an.d..ie.w._.:-_-.a.buscs r and the victims of the Viet' \
. Cong's systematic campaign of terrorism......r~~~p~to-by-Mr;·:Sc-otb .
--'r.,.. ".'.-.....-..\- ,\'", .~,.~ (~ .....~.\. . . ~, q . • . "-
In order to clarify this important question to the millions o{ con- I j
cerned Americans who mig-ht-be mi s3 ed....b..y:...M...r.......lic.ott!s.:.c.olulTIl).J I should \ ' f'-' '.
appreciate your publishing this letter. ._ rl --
C?~ (.~~~l ) j ~iDcerely ,
..... _-_.----- W. E. Colby

0067.1
(- . '.
(
.-
.'
- ~.
t.
~ENOER WILL CHECK CLA. 'ICATJON TOP AND BOTTOM
tiNCLASSIFIED I I CONFIDI:::'iTlA•• I SECRET
-.- .... ~,
OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP .

1
Colonel \Vhite
2
"
I
•j
5
l
6 L~
ACTION DIRfCT REPLY PP.EP1.P.E l:EPLY
I.PPROVAL DISPATCH RECOW.iHiDA nON
C(H.~I.1EHT FILE P.HUP.lf
COHCURI\EHCE It:FORMATlOH SIG/;ATUIIE
r
Remarks:
. ,
~.
Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent t

to you for comments. II
-
~"k- tfl-o ~;5f; J ' Lit-
~-/~~~
~cfJ~~
~~~~
tJ.- ~ c.Y:- ~
FOLD HERE TO RETURN Tn

FRO!·1: NAME, A~;:;i'fESS AND PHO~ NO. DATE
O/ExDir I 10 Jan 72
I U;,\CI.AS 'U'I t.lI. t t CO:'iFJDE!'\TJAL I SECIlET
(.to)
loa", flO. Un previous tdilions
1-67 237
00672
,
,
(" (
!
-"5317 Briley Place
10 January 1972
Mr. Lloyd Shcarer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
Dear Mr. Shearer:
i
i
Parade responses stated that CIA "uscs 'political assassination as a
weapon" and that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new
I high for U. S. political as sassinations in Vietnam." Sincc I have held
II
rcsponsible positions in CIA for many years and was also (during de-
tached scrvice from CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Opcration
Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public'
a. CIA does not and has not us ed political as sas sination as

a weapon.
b. Operation Phoe~ix was run not by the CIA but by the

Govermnent of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS clement
of the U. S. Military As sistance Command.
c. Operation Phoenix is not a program of assassination.

Members of the Viet Cong apparatus were killed in the course
of military o'perations or resisting police arrest. There is a
vast difference in kind, not mercly dcgree, betwcen these (even
including occasional -- and few - - abuscs) and the Viet Cong's
conscious campaign of terrorism referred toby Mr. Scott.
In order to clarify·this important question to the millions of con-

cerned Americans who might be mislcd by Mr. Scott's column, I should
appreciate your publishing this lctter.
Sincerely,
W. E. Colby
00673
. ( - '. .....
~.
SENDE" WILL CHECK CL.AS 'CATION TO;- AND BOTTOM

" "
U'iC!..ASSI FI ED i I ,-o!'\FlDEl'iTIAL I SECRET
OFFICIAL ROUTI~G SLIP ..

"",":"-11
TO NAME AND ADDRESS DATE INIT/AI..S
1
Mr. George Carver
2
!
.,
• I
k
..
S
l
6
,
l
ACTION O~P.ECTr.EPLY FREI'Ar.E REPLY
APPROVAL DISPATCH RECGW~EHDI. nON
CO~MEHT FILE RETUr.H
COHCURRENCE INFORMATIOH SIGIlATURE
Remarks: r<
Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent l,

to you [or comments. If possible, we should
\
appreciate receiving your response this after-
noon. .
FOL.D HERE TO f~ETURN TO SENDER

F'ROM: N"'~E. AOORESS AND PHONE NO. DATE
O!Execut;.ve Director1 ~O Jan 72

I
I U;';CLASSIFIED I I CO;';FIDE:-iTIAL I SEcm:T
fOlIC /Ill. 237 Use previDus tdiliDns
(.co,
1-67
00674
I
.
.... ..... :
,
.
'
5317 Briley Place

10 January 1972 ~ ~
Mr. Lloyd Sheare

/ ~ '/~;J'Y
. . - .1, 0 . L
.~~
Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
Dear lvf.r. Shearer: {G 1~~0''\£

In your issue of January 9th, ne of' alter Scott's Personahty I ~~'.
Parade responses stated that CIA " u es politi a1 assassination as a
YJ
,.1\ ,
weaponll'and that Operation Phoenix. 1 un by the CIA established a new

high for U. S. political as sas sination in Vietna ." Since I have held . /
responsible positions in CIA for many ears and s also (during de-
tached service from CIA) responsible - or U. S. sup ort to Operation
Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualif~ed to testify (~ I have in public
session under oath to Senate and House Committees) t
a. CIA does not and has not u ed political as sas ination as

a weapon.
b. Operation Phoenix was run ct by the CIA but by he

Government of Victnam with the su port of t?e CORDS3~len~t . ~
" , _ _ 't1 of the U. ~. Milita,J'Y Assistance
, ~ uS ~ ~ ~ c.lfl ..a....-& 1>-' _~ L,:"~:L
mand.lf::- ~
. '
fO -..-.....
,I ~->JI:. w-SA..·~Operation~hoe~~.:i~p..Je p,logram ~f as~as~ination/l~I-e'h'Lt,!.

~~f.
A
1\irer.n15ers of
.--+ 'l't t"
tAG>~';;.~g~1
l:,~~:ursi\W~~~l11c~l~i·t~fcO\ir~-
("("1\, I ~., I \,\!._~ .:.=-- ~;"::l [L Tl .
j
_~
&v'nll\~P" ml 1 ary opera 10n6 'or l'OS:1EdJi1g71\?~-t..~r lere ly
. vast d~fference ,in kind, not mcrely'-deg'rce" be~~?E~..,!hcs,.c;\{eYcn
includmg occaslOnal -- and few -- abuscs)and thcA Vict Cbhg's
~. ~f~-tl'c-~=-campaignof terrorism refcrred to by Sc {to Mr.
1· In order to clarify this important question toft millions of con-
cerned Americans who might be misled by M ...~ott's column, I should
appreciate you:- publishing this letter.
Sincerely,
w. E. Colby
00675
---r z ""·· ...; .•.•. _. - ._.,~ ... \r· .•.. _-.-.~._. ~--.._-_ ........ ...
-
I) e v( r
tD [Up. 's ..~ "'I "/ t. ,I '\1

o II-~ .,
.
I
;c~e.t'(e 1- ........1 rio e(.rJ, ft~frt}.'" ,'"

i
iC( ; .... 1,) . .., '\')(!rJ.".I,\~t p~ ""'~t I,,) '/ ~ (.o.(~·~"'1
I
~ ,'i-~ ... ,. (I "''1 (..., ...,... )..,'.... vJ ~. tJ -t \fr r
Ie.
I
0 I) ~~ . . ~"'"
I~"'" .. (>ti'·... .0.(. o.,J/.JJ.'.d·'·~ .' P4.""1 ,J
t \" J '" h I f . ,. f--I.I t ! ~ ... OJ C}. • Off ·f r.. ., eJ .J

I1i-~r.':JL
() ""
c.. "'~P\""t .. t $ ~ v'', ~H"')
\).>L,"~ t-~~ ~ 1,., ~"tf,.,·".,,,/
I~ ·C()o,c{.\..,h 1-'.~ (;lt/,'",,'/-,'t) ~~ (;).1/ e>f=
,Ili- J C • ""0 _.. 1-, .. "',·h·t..... p' I.',.. c> "I <-,'v,',.'·,
il'V\,·.,'s ~"'tl - - w~. ~rt ~. >0, ...., oJ..... '" p
I~Jfo"'S"~I"'\"J-t f'f c~r'\"'J W/'ft.. vo.. .. ,\~\,.U {..Cf:~J
~~~ f.&.~ V ,'t1--11 G,""tH (oNMCn\l) f P-.t/-1 J c~",t'\~lJ'\l.
i
I ~f{.H1- 1-.
II() (. ().r ..... s, T \tt ~C:M~trJ <>.p. f ~C (6 ~I.\ 7\'·\/J.
"--::.::.-~\otL Vtt.J- Co \:? - - J
I
;potf.1 ~,,,=,.o.rc~1 ().\t( Q./' p.'tA.t~) ;::'l-,I"J 1- ,'q
:-!
w'
~1-~t G-.v,r,.. "~ ," '<.",r":J>V"'';;' 'f-<, f,·ft,f
Iltld F o.l~OJ -(. t'", Vo ",'ttJ '1 Cf).,,. ~t O: .. ...,J o.'Cf 00676
~ l-~t Nl)".~ !~"'I\" ~~~hVl <z! ,~ I;) 'l usvc. I1 1
(
........;:
~~~fO"tr~~(,t ~tl o."~f/ VVl'''/''J.~·1 ~St~tl- ur

~ ~o.~..,( v.,,1 \).""1'1-. S I''''~ t:>."1 o.f/..t.~ 1,1- 1-0
'o-.r-HSI- po.r-I-t «I~ Pw'\ !trJ (Sf', ffJI f -tl'( V {, rI,/, fQ.f '}
I
; ),' -{ '~b "t ... t,tl

:05fi'tl'lJ..rU o.-h.,u,.£ 11\~'J"~U7' ~~".,'IJ ~O...,t.
,Jl-I'nrl vf' -(I'ft {? ~t.J t\1~~!('''J 0 f. /-~l..
I
"V}\,\ ." (0 "',S

V ~ rj) p.. (.. /.lJ.)
_~ ~,,(. Jed v ,'Olj) 'y ,}
j
l"t~~ \t..,'\h~ .'", t-~t ~()UiJe of- rv-."/l'f.'''J
i
~r(!"'~'''''''~ 0" w~,'r't,.. t-tJ,'Jtl'-v ft>f"te ~t·~rJJ.
I
; ~~t~ ,'I J -e.t \:J ~J 1= . c.tt- ~t vJt v"'J 0.... VtlJ I-
:4,'/ft,.tM t .'", k,\.. ,) ., .. ,.. r\'ItV't.ty 4tl rre.) L\tWH,
!h ~ t CO-J v ~ \ ,. \'p .t1 ~,. ,''I ,'+.J f, •~ Q..,. """ t tl c ~ t'>11 ct t
;C,vt~ . r\d\lc('\"J 0 ((~JI'o~cd ,- o.,t{ {.lw" CQvr"t1~hl;'
! o...~tl J\J) . <'1'-~ ht V,\ I- (0 ~!J c~ '1J c ,I" v~
:~'()J-tw.,t,\v- C~~/~U.'J~ or 'f-~""Of''.J"" ~cu'flJf
0'\ ~"f.J\t(( f\~~ .. co.t-A!~no.uJ.) I'tl-~,t'fl ;..~ (I
fr1 r .. !: t <> It
00677
,-
....
.
.' .
,-----_. ---.-- . -- ..... __ ... ------~---"--------~--~----,
I ~::::NDEl': WILL CHECK CL,6.!' ICATION TOP AND BOTTOM

UNCLASSJFlED I I ~ONFIDE..YnAL I SECIlET
JFFICIAL ROUTI~G SLIP

TO ,NAME AND ADDRESS DATE
1 D~/I btP JAN 1972 /0 9~J

v
2 !l
3
\AL.~ , (~{~tn
.. )
s l - "- ---.
.
I
•
I
6
ACTIOlt
AFPRO\,Al
COt!.MEHT
CONCIJRP.ENCE
DIRECT REPLY
DISPATCH
FILE
INFORMATION
PP.EPARE I\EPLY
r.ECOHMENUAlIOK
RETlIRK
SIGI:UURE
l
Remarks:
Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent r

to you for comments. If possible, 'we should
appreciate your response this aftern00n. r
-
~"""""""''r''''''''''.~;~rT~~~.
."".o.......-~.....a......:io.,;~~·<I-t .. ru ..-
. • "'Cl&
-. 1
!
FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENC!::R

FROM: NAME. ADDRESS AND PHONE: NO. DATE:
O/Executive Directorl I 110 Jan 72

I UNCLASSIFIED I ~v. '." "'L""" L I SECRET
roaN NO. Un plevious edilions
1-61 237
I
006?8
I
I 4 ...... \ .... (
( I ~~~,. r '/'.:;"J/.J.:..,.~
.. 5317 Brilc'y Place- - - - -

10 January 1972
Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
New York. New York 10011
Dear Mr. Shearer:

Parade responses stated that CIA "uses political assassination as a
weapon" and that Operation .Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new
··• high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnaln." Since I have held
. "
·l
I
tached service from crAJ responsible for U. S. support to Operation
Phoenix, I believe I amlYniquel0qualifi~d to testify (as I have in public'
I session under oath to Senate and House Committees) that:
a. CIA does not and has not used political assassination as

-1 a weapon.
b. Operation Phoenix was run not by the CIA but by t
Ii
Govermnent of Vietnam with the support of the ,----...
of the l!. S. Military As sistance Cornm.and.
CORDS '-
el--
""""-- .
!
I c. Operation Phoenix is not a program of as sas sination.
I
Members of the Viet Gong apparatus wcre killed in the course
..i
f of military operations or resisting police arrest. There_is
. a ___ ,,-- \ I
vast difference in kind, not merely degree, between~hcsjl(even
including occasional -- arid few -- abuses) and theViet-Cong's
oonscious campaign of terrorism referred to by Mr. Scott•
•
In order to clarify this important question to the millions of con-
cerned Axnericans who might be misled by Mr. Scott's colwnn, I should
appreciate your publishing this letter.
Sincerely,
w. E. Colby
-
I' 00679
.-
( ~
·.-. ~J
Mr. Houston
. Mr. Warner
j
s
L.
'00680
.I
I ••
( ...'
.' T
.
.'
I
:::ENDER WILL CHECK CL~ ICATION TOP AND BOTTOM
UNCJ.ASSIFll::D I I ,--ONFJDE:-iTUL I SEcnET
OFFICIAL ROUTIXG SLIP

//
1 Gene/aI/OUDs el
2
1./
w .
.
" . -.~. -~
l
6
ACTION O:r.ECT REPLY PR~!'I.J;E REPLY

lFPilOVAl DISPI.TCH REC01r:MHiDATlON
COII.t;1EHT mE RETURN
-- .. CONcur-fiErCE IliFOr-MATIOH SIGl\ATURE
Hemnrks:
r.:
,r
Mr. Colby asked fhat the attached be sent
to you for conunents. If possib1e.....-.Yl.c sholllii..:
appreciate your response this afternoon.
, - I
:
FOLD Ht:.RE TO RETURN TO SENDER

FROM: NAME. AOOr-ESS AND PHONE NO. DATE
O/ExDir~ 10 Jan 72
I Ul"CLASSIFIEP I I CO:-iFInE:-iTUL I SECHET
(.cO)
fOl~ "0. Uu previous editions
1-67 237
, 00681
I
JIf .. '." • !'" .....
,
..:
5317 Briley Place
10 January 1972
Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
·733 Third Avenue
New York. New York 10017
Dear Mr. Shearer:

iI Parade responses stated that CIA. "uses political assassination as a
! weapon" an~ that Operation Phoenix "run by the CIA established a new
high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam." Since I have held
tached service from CIA) responsible for U. S. support to Operation
I 'Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public
i
I·
session under oath to Senate and HOl,lse Committees) that:
I
a. CIA does not and has not us ed political as sas sination as
.j a weapon.
b. Operation Phoe be ,-vas run not by the CIA but by the

Goverrunent of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS eleme.,rt
.. Llt of the U. S. Military Assistance Conunand,,·l.-. <:-o-o-rJ.. ,'lA.o_\ ,'~
~ C(/7 ~ c~ U.s O-o~
c •. Operation Phoenix is not a program of assassination.
of military operations or resisting police arrest. There is a
vast differenc'e in kind, not merely degree, between these (even
including occasional -- and few -- abusesfand the Viet Cong's
conscious campaign of terrorism referred to by Mr. Scott .
•
In order to clarify this iInportant question to the millions of c on-
cerned Americans who might be misled by Mr. Scott's column, 1 should
Sincerely,
w. E. Colby
00682
( (
"'f"
- SENDER WILL CHECK CL FICATION TOP .l.ND BOTTOM

Ul\CLASSIFI ED I I CO:'\FlDE:'iTIAL I SEcnET
OFFICIAL. ROUTING SLIP

./
/
TO NAME AND' ADDRESS DATE INITIALS
1 Mr. Angq,hhuermer lOJAf'«

.. 1 !l7Z
S
(~/[C~Ev
4 I
5
- I
I
6 I
ACTlOl4 DIRECT REPLY Pr.EFARE REPLY t
I.PPROVAL
COMP.lENT
COHCURREHCE
DISfATCH
FILE
INFORMATION
RtCGI~mHOATIOIi
nETl':llt
SIGSAlUP,£
- L
Remarks:
Mr. Colby asked that the attached be sent

r
to you for conlm~ .1tS. If possible, we should
appreciate receiving your response this after-
noon. .
,f
I
I
.. " .,
" .

FROM: NAME. ADDRESS Ar~D PHONE NO. DATE
a/Executive Director/ 10 Jan 72

I U:,\CLASSIFIED I I CO:'it 1J1e•• ' llA L I SECHET
(40)
fORM 110. Use p'evi~us editions
1-67 237
I
00683
.I
i (
~ -_ .....
The noted phrases :ihould, in my opi:don..:>
~
be cut out. ~ They are the kind.. that lead to the t
italticiz~d "Editor's Not!!'! ~t the end of the letter l
which rebuts ~e whole ~oi~~ ~eing nade by
the letter writer.
r
"R~3isting po :_ce arrest " 'Hill gC't r
you, with thl' prec;s, nothing but sni~.c illicldng
cracks ••• and as we're really not going to Jl win
too much in :-uch a short letter anyway, ~'Jhy not sldp
~he occassional abuses bit.
Them's my thots.
ANT
rGr
.W
00684
.I
( ,--
.. ~
~:dl7 n riley Ph·: e
Washington, D. C. '.' I)" S
lO Janua ry 1912
Mr. Lloyd Shearer

Editor at Large
Parade Magazine
733 Third Avenue
New York, New York l0017
Dear l\.1r. Shearer:
In your issue of January 9th, one of Walter Scott's _Pe!."~ona1i.!Y

Para~(' responses stated that CIA " uses political asc;assination as a
weapon" and that Operation Phoenix " run by the CIA established a new
high for U. S. political assassinations in Vietnam. II Since I have held
tached s erVi ce from CIA) res pon sible for U. S. support to Operati on
Phoenix, I believe I am uniquely qualified to testify (as I have in public'
a. CIA does not and has not used political assassination as

a weapon.
b. Operation Phoen.ix "..as run not by the CIA but by the

Goverrunent of Vietnam with the support of the CORDS element
of the U. S. Military Assistance Conunand.
"
c. Operation Phoenix is not a program of assassination.
of military operations b..E::-1=-esisting~police~arr_<;:.~~~There is a
vast difference in kind, not rnerely degree, between these L~",c.t1u
..inG-l\1ding..:>oc.cal>iona,1~--"""'and.fewA-=:"'.;.auuse~
aud the Viet Cong I s
conscious campaign of terrorism referred to by Mr. Scott.
In order to clarify this important question to the mi~ons of con-

cerned Alnericans who might be n.isled by Mr. Scott's colurr~ I shoulci
Sincerely,
W. E. Colby
00685
. ....
. .,1 "'"
~ t/r< ,.
'.<RJ (;)~
!~ .1 F 0- 7I fer L- ~t j
tG;; ~ ~ .~J- ~ ,
!~~~ ~ ~J I
o:~. ~.)~~
~ ~ £- 7;;-- A-~
1 r ~. ~;J.~
I$- .bJU E
?uD~t~£d!/;
. G~· ~ o-St "'~

, . ,.
, .. ,(
. -. ....
~. - -. ~_ ... - .~ -' ,__ ., ~.~-.,_....._ . .., '._v_ - .. -'- .- -.' . ,--" - ... , - -. ," " .. - .._.' -.
.".. '
00687
. _,1_., . __..
.I
, . ~ I..: \
,
J'
r'-- ~".'--- -.-_.- - ~ ~ - " " ~ - - ..;;.1", .... --:-- .. - .. _r --,.

· - .. '<w;""~ _ . • - . . . . . _ ..... ~ .,._. ~- • • _ . . . . . . ~ ' __,' __ • _.,. • . ~ "-~r-'. _P"
. : I.. ; .
(
r-' - ...• - .
00689
.. ..... :.
. . ..
II .
I
.- . . . . . ..
~ l1c.u ~ ~.
~-----.~. / ~ .' ~
" .
~.u-y ~I
-tt:; v~ ~ J=
~ ~ ~~~ R~.~<,- . . ~~~
~;blf{?lJ). / ~ Cl-- r-1 1

/ 00690
I~
t
,
\ .
a..
I ..•
I
, .
\
t'
...... ... .
\
.'
L~: I ~ -d:;- ~ ~ l~
~¢r= 1"CJb-c:e ~ ~
, ..-f+-
~~
.' . . .00'69:1'"
. ..
. '
..
..
~ ~
. f \j
\ .-'
-... _ - -"-
r'-~-""''''''-'''''''':-'- ~ . _.,-_ .:., · . r·7'W-_·~-, ·.~·,,- - _ 6- ..
'
.. !
--
o
0069Z
-~ .. _.. - .... _. - ~. -_.. .. -- ... -_.
\ . .." . '. --,,
, . .' . ("'"
. 00693

Family Jewels

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Family Jewels

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

,· .

( Di rec tor 0 f SC cur it} > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -...- - -

i J - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - . - . ------ -----.--- . - . - . - ...._ ..-

7. APPROVED FOR RELEASE

'\ 15. L VL\.- I'

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary,

1. The purpose of this memorandum is to

2. Johnny Roselli -- The use of a member of the

a conscious decision was made by the Agency to

SUBJECT: Johnny Roselli

In August 1960, Mr. Richard M. Bissell

15. In May 1962, Mr. William Harvey took over

16. It was subsequently learned from the FBI

17. On 2 December 1968, Roselli, along with

18. Mr. Harvey reported to the Office of Security

19. On 17 November 1970, Maheu called James

20. On 18 November 1970, Mr. Helms was briefed

complete agreement with our stand. He further advised

.*1m ::nnrmr7t'n *'1 ,

Project Mockingbird, a telepl10ne intercept activity, was conducted

Telephone intercept connections were installed at the newmen's

The intercept activity was particularly productive in identifying con-

Since the termination of Project Mockingbird, those materials related

SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko

Yuriy Ivanovich NosenkQ, an officer of the KGB,

valuable and economical defector this Agency has ever

the periods 6-9 October, 27 October-lO December 1971

Gas Mask M-9 200

Gas Mask ]\1-17 196

Steel Helmet and Liners 231

Vest and Groin Protector 96

Vest, Flak M-52 34

Vest, Grenade 105

Emergency Flashing Red Light 22

*Searchlight, Tear Gas 36

*Chemical Baton 6 1/2" 36

*Chemical Baton 12" 24

·*Chemical Baton 26" 24

'~Searchlight with Shoulder Strap 36

*NOTE: Various quantities and types of replacement chemical

On 25 July 1968, and at the specific request

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Hm",rard Osborn

1. In responding on 7 May by memorandum to the DDO's

2. Although this completely innocent--although sub-

}1E'J10RANDUM FOR THE RECORD

SUBJECT I IEquipment Test, Hiami, Florida,

The following details concerning

,- ~ ~~rL~,_~~~r~e~t~i=,red, formerly assigned to

Iwas reluctant- to calli lat home

ROUTlNG ftJ~D r~ECOr~D SHEET

Ex. Dir. -Compt.

MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Direetor-Cornptroller

SUBJECT ROSELLI, John

1. This menlorandmTI is for your inforrnation only.

2. Reference is made to our recent conversation regarding

3. Roselli is presently serving a prison sentence for con-

4. This Agency was aware that Roselli intended to expose

5. Individuals who were aware of this project were: Messrs.

William Harvey, and Jar-nes P. O'Connell. Also included were

6. On 26 February 1971 arrangements were nlade with

M.EMORANDUM FOR: Executive Director-Con,ptroller

SUBJECT HOSELLI, John

1. Tbis :r..Jcrnorandum is for your _i_nJc:.~rrlation only.

Z. Reference is made to our recent conversation regarding

.1m ::nnrmr7t'n '1 ,

1. In D.:o<..:ember 1970 R.obert Ingersoll, head of the Bureau of ~Jar