OUTLINE IN CIVIL LAW REVIEW I SY 2016-2017 Note: All articles references are to the Family Code unless a Civil Code article reference ( NCC ) is indicated, |, INTRODUCTION - CHANGES IN NEW CIVIL CODE PRELIMINARY TITLE Ul, EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS Arts. | to 13, pp. 1-52 of Tolentino NCC 1-18 A. When law takes effect NCC 2 Revised Administrative Code (RAC) Secs, 18-24 Exec. Order 200, Sec. 2 Tafiada v. Tuvera 136 SCRA 27 B. Ignorance of the law NCC 3 ~ KASILAG Vs. RODRIGUEZ, 69 PHIL 217 ~Elegado v. Court of Appeals, 173 SCRA 285 C, Retroactivity of laws NCC 4, cf. NCC 2252 - 2269 Revised Penal Code (RPC) 22 Family Code (FC) 256 David v Agbay, G.R. No. 199113, March 18, 2015 Abad v. Philcomsat, G.R. No. 200620, March 18, 2015 D. Mandatory or Prohibitory Laws NCC Art. 5 with NCC Art. 17 (3) ~Nerwin v PNOC, G.R. No. 167057, April 11, 2012 E. Waiver of rightsNCC Art. 6 NCC Art. 2035 “DM Consunji vs. CA, G.R. No. 137873, April 20, 2001 ~ Dela Cruz v. Dela Cruz, GR. No. 192383, December 4, 2013. ‘Pona Adela v Tidcorp, G.R. No. 201931, February 11, 2015 F. Repeal of laws NCC 7 cf 1987 Constitution, Art. XVIII Sec, 3 FC 254 ~Thornton vs. Thornton, Aug. 16, 2004 Kidav Senate, G.R. No. 196271, February 28, 2012 Yinlu Bicol v Trans-Asia, G.R. No. 207942, Yan 1 2015 G. Judicial Decisions NCC 8 Pesca vs. Pesca, G.R. No. 136921, April 17, 2001 De Castro v IBC, G. R. No. 191002, April 20, 2010 Virtucio v Alegarbes, G.R. No. 187451, August 29, 2012 Republic v Rehman Enterprises, GR 199310, Feb.19, 2014 ~CLT Realty v Hi-Grade Feeds Corporation, G.R. No. 160684, Sept, 2, 2015 H. Duty to render judgment NCC 9, 10 RPC 5 People v. Ritter 194 SCRA 690 1. Presumption and Applicability of Custom NCC 11-12 cf. 1987 Constitution, Art. XII Sec, 5 Rules of Court Rule 129 (2), (3) “Martinez v. Van Buskirk, 18 Phil. 79 Tomawis v Balindong, G.R. No. 182434, March 5, 2010 (en bane) J. Legal periods NCC 13 cf Rules of Court (ROC) Rule 22 EO 292, RAC Sec. 31 ¢Commr. v Primetown, GR 162155, August 28, 2007“Comnr. v. Aichi Forging, G.R. No. 184823, October 6, 2010 11. CONFLICT OF LAWS NCC 14 Art, 2, Revised Penal Code NCC 15 ef. FC 26 par. 2 ~Fenchavez v. Escafio 15 SCRA 355 Lavadia vs. Heirs of Luna, G.R. No. 171914, July 23, 2014— Board of Commissioners vs. de la Rosa, 197 SCRA 853 ATCI Overseas Corp vs. Echin, G.R. No. 178551, Oct. 11, 2010 NCC 16 ~Amos v Bellis, 20 SCRA 358 ~ Tayag v Benguet Consolidated, GR L-23145, Nov. 29, 1968 Del Socorro v Van Wilsem, GR 193707, Dec. 10, 2014 NCC 17 (Kazuhiro Hasegawa vs, Kitamura, G.R. No. 149177, November 23, 2007 “Raytheon v Rouzie, GR 162894, February 26, 2008 NCC 18 ‘Tamano v Ortiz, G.R. No. 126603, June 29, 1998 Llave vs Republic, GR 169766, March 30, 2011 ~Zamoranos v People, G.R. No. 193902, June 1, 2011 IV. HUMAN RELATIONS NCC 19 ~ 22, vis-a-vis Breach of Promise to Marry Wassmer v. Velez 12 SCRA 648 Tanjanco v. CA 18 SCRA 994 Baksh v. CA, 219 SCRA 115 Abanag v Mabute, AM P-11-2922, April 4, 2011 PERSONS V. CAPACITY TO ACT 1. Presumption of capacity GIAT1 __V Catalan vs. Basa, G.R. No. 159567, July 31, 2007 ‘Schizoprenia2. Restrictions on capacity to act NCC 38 - 39, cf. NCC 1327 (a) Minority, R.A. 6809, FC 5; 45 (1); ef. R.A. 6809, NCC 1327, NCC 1390 (par. 1), 1403 (par. 3), NCC 1397, 1399, NCC 1489, NCC 1426-1427, 4 one = ede Y Mercado v. Espiritu 37 Phil 215 Wuder v Atizado vs People, GR No. 173822, October 13, 2010 (b) Insanity, FC 45 (2), NCC 1327 (1), 1328 Cirderelle oe ‘Hernandez vs Santos, G.R. No. 169217, August 7, 2009 \wsomaty & Cri(cap¢) “People v Bulagao, GR 184757, Oct. 5, 2011 Cine butden Art =see@"/ Oropesa v Oropesa, GR 184528, April 25,2012 (My © r) = —Taileh font lin f Gyid» (Cunbiani? ) ~ Gide Or [OFE- Censwlh- port 7 (ec) Deaf-Mutism, NCC 1327 (2), 807 & 820 (d) Prodigality, ROC Rule 92 Sec. 2 i (e) Civil Interdiction, RPC 31, 34, 41 /\o2,\°l , #2) FC (f)_ Family Relations, FC 150-151; cf. FC 87, NCC 1490, NCC 2035, ef. NCC 963-967 | (i) 1225 (g) Alienage, of. Art. IV, Secs. 1-5, 1987 Constitution (h) Absence, NCC 381 — 396, FC 41 (i) Insolvency and Trusteeship, NCC 1381, 1491, 2236 @ Gender, Art. II, Sec. 14, 1987 Constitution; cf. NCC 403 See also: Rule 3 Section 4, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure (k) Physical Incapacity/Disease, FC 45(5), 45(6), 46, NCC 820 Facing. (east A Heirs Of Favis, Sr. v Gonzales, et al., GR. No. 185922, Jan. 15 2014 Cong roma % ‘A. NATURAL PERSONS if fern 4+ 240m A wrorn vee tor He bead inberedt feat) NCC 40 - 41 (we, eFC) lari any af 7 De Jesus v Syquia, G.R. No. L-391 10, Nov. 28, 1933 tepteiiss “/ Geluz v. CA 2 SCRA 801 v Continental Steel vs. Montano, GR 182836, October 13, 2009 Quimiging v Icao, 34 SCRA 134 NCC 42 Weaen Meme Y Limjoco v. Intestate Estate of Pio Fragante 80 Phil 776 yDumlao v. Quality Plastics 70 SCRA 472 Eugenio v. Velez 185 SCRA 425 /Berot v. Siapno, G.R. No. 188944, July 09, 2014 NCC 43, Rule 131, Sec. 33, ROC wEwoJS Joaquin v. Navarro 93 Phil 257 B. Juridical Persons excluded from Bar coverage 1. CITIZENSHIP AND DOMICILE Oe 2, 12 Art, IV, Sec. 1, 1987 Constitution NCC 50 FC 68-69, cf. NCC 110, ef. FC 55, 101, 152 v Romualdez-Marcos vs COMELEC, 248 SCRA 300 ilando v HRET, August 23, 2011 David v Agbay, G.R. No. 199113 March 18, 2015 lary Grace Natividad S. Poe-Llamanzares vs. Commission on Elections, G.R. Nos. 221697 & 221698-700, April 5, 2016 II. SURNAMES NCC 364-380, RA 9255, FC 176 ] VIP ¥ CRANCE ye ANTONIO + “Yasin v. Hon. Judge Shari’a Court G.R. No. 94986 (1995) In the Matter of the Adoption of Stephanie Nathy Astorga Garcia, G.R. No. 148311, March 31, 2005. Remo v DFA, March 5, 2010 /Gonzaludo v People, 2006 (Limson v. Gonzalez, G.R. No. 162205, March 31, 2014 memoe2e BUA US eb —F IV. EMANCIPATION RA 6809 A. Cause of emancipation, FC 234 as amended B. Effect of emancipation, FC 236 as amended ef. FC 15, NCC 2180 V. RULES GOVERNING PERSONS WHO ARE ABSENT. NCC 381-383, 384-389, FC 96, 101, 124, NCC 390-396, FC 41 Reyes v. Alejandro, 141 SCRA 65 Eastem Shipping v. Lucero, 124 SCRA 425 Manuel vs. People, G.R. No. 165842, Nov. 29, 2005 \Pantollano v Korphil, GR 169575, March 30, 2011 cRep. vs Granada, GR 187512, June 13, 2012 “Rep. vs Narceda, GR 182760, April 10, 2013y % Republic v Hon. Estrada, G.R. No.@14792) March 18, 2015 VI. FUNERALS NCC 305-310, FC 195 VIL. ENTRIES IN THE CIVIL REGISTER NCC 407-413 RA 9048 Rule 108, Rules of Court ¥ Céppre - Antnio ‘Dela Cruz v Gracia, G.R. No. 177728, July 31, 2009 VBraza v Registrar, G.R. No. 181174, December 4, 2009 -Baldos vs. CA, G.R. No. 170645, July 9, 2010 ¥VCorpus v Sto. Tomas, GR 18671, Aug. 11, 2010 ‘epublic v Magpayo, GR 189476, Feb. 2, 2011 Republic v Uy, GR 198010, Aug. 12, 2013 4 “}wasawa vs Gangan, , G.R. No. 204169, SEP 11 2013 “Republic v Olaybar, G.R. No. 189538, February 10, 2014 Onde v. Office of the Local Civil Registrar,G.R. No. 197174, September 10, 2014 = ppy® ‘Republic v. Dela Vega, G.R. No. 195873, Feb. 23, 2015 ERD FAMILY RELATIONS Legarda, Mawis and Vargas, “Family Law in the Philippines.” I. MARRIAGE, A. The concept of and nature of marriage, FC 1 cf. NCC 52, FC 149 Goitia vs Campos-Rueda, 35 Phils 252 Silverio vs Republic, October 22, 2007 People v De La Cruz, G.R. No.187683, February 11, 2010 De Santis v Jalandoni, GR 178221, December 1, 2010 Espinosa v Omana, AC No. 9081, October 12, 2011 Avenido v Avenido, G.R. No. 173540, Jan 22 2014 Cercado-Siga v. Cercado, Jr., G.R. No. 185374, March 11, 2015 Tambuyat v. Tambuyat, G.R. No. 202805, March 23, 2015 Calimag v Heirs of Macapaz, GR No. 191936, June 1, 2016 B. — Requisites, FC 2-3; FC 5; FC 45 cf. NCC 53 1. Essential requisites 2. Formal RequisitesDISCUSSION: A. Difference in Sex — FC 2 (1), 4 (1), 39. Silverio vs Republic, G.R. No. 174689, October 22, 2007 B. Some Form of Ceremony ~ FC 3 (3), 4 (1), 6,8 Martinez v. Tan 12 Phil 731 COMPARE TO: Morigo v People, 422 SCRA C. Legal Capacity — Art. 2(1) 1. Age (Articles 5, 35(1), 39, 45(1), 3701) 2. Relationship (Articles 37, 38 (1-8), 39) 3. Prior Marriage (Articles 35 (4), 35 (6), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 52,53 & 39, NCC 390-391, FC 55 (9), FC 101, ) Republic v Nolasco, 220 SCRA 20 Garcia vs. Recio, 365 SCRA 437 Te vs. Choa, G.R. No. 126746, Nov. 29, 2000 Nollora v People, GR 191425, September 7, 2011 SSS vs Jarque vda. De Bailon, G.R. No. 165545, March 24, 2006 Republic v Tampus, GR 214243, March 16, 2016 Wiegel v. Sempio-Diy, 143 SCRA 499 (1986) Terre v. Terre, 211 SCRA 6 Bobis v Bobis, GR 139509, July 31, 2000 Mercado vs Tan, 337 SCRA 122 Morigo vs Morigo, 422 SCRA Tenebro vs. CA, G.R. No. 150758. February 18, 2004 Montanez vs Cipriano, GR 181089, October 22, 2012 Capili v People, GR 183805, July 3, 2013 See: Abbas vs Abbas, G.R. No. 183896, January 30, 2013 People v Odtuhan, GR 191566, July 17, 2013 Iwasawa vs Gangan, , G.R. No. 204169, Sept. 11 2013 Republic v Cantor, G.R. No. 184621, December 10, 2013[en banc] Lasanas v People, G.R. No. 15903, June 23, 2014 SSS v. Azote, G.R. No. 209741, April 15, 2015 Republic v Hon, Estrada, G.R. No. 214792, March 18, 2015 Republic v. Villanueva, G.R. No. 210929, July 29, 2015 4, Article $3, 525. Crime — FC 38 (9) 6. Physical Incapacity — FC 45 (5), 47 (5) Jimenez v. Cafiizares 109 Phil 27 Alcazar v Alcazar, G.R. No. 174451, October 13, 2009 7. Psychological Incapacity - FC 36, 68-73 Santos v. CA 240 SCRA 20 Chi Ming Tsoi v. CA _G.R. No. 119190, Jan. 16, 1997 Republic v. Olaviano Molina (1997) Antonio vs.Reyes, G.R. No. 155800, Mar. 10,2005 Te vs Te, GR No. 161793, Feb. 13, 2009 Azcueta vs RP, G.R. No. 180668, May 26, 2009 Halili v Halili, GR 165424, June 9, 2009 (Motion for Recon) Najera v Najera, July 3, 2009 Camacho v Reyes, G.R. No. 185286, August 18, 2010 Kalaw v. Fernandez, G.R. NO. 166357, 14 Jan. 2015 Vinas v Vinas, G. R. No. 208790, January 21, 2015 Mallilin v Jamesolamin, G.R. No. 192718, 18 Feb. 2015 D. Consent - FC 45, 35 (5), 39 a. Insanity (Articles 45(2), 47(2)) b. Fraud (Articles 45 (3), 46) Buceat v. Buccat 72 Phil 49 Anaya vs Palaroan, Nov. 26, 1970 Villanueva vs CA, 505 Scra 564 Almelor v RTC, Aug. 26, 2008 c. Duress ~ force, intimidation or undue influence (Articles 45 (4), 47 (4) Villanueva vs CA, 505 Scra 564 d. Mistake as to Identity (Articles 35 (5), 39) e. Disease — FC 45 (6), 47 (5) f. No Consent Republic v Albios, G.R. No. 198780, October 16, 2013E. Authority of the Solemnizing Officer (Articles 3 (1), 4 (1), 7, 10, 31, 32, 35 (2), R.A. 7160 (1991 Local Government Code), Secs. 444(b)(I)(xviii), 445 (b)(1) (xviii) Aranes vs Occiano, 380 SCRA 402 ‘Navarro v. Domagtoy S.C. A.M. MTJ-96-1088, July 19, 1996 Beso v Daguman, 323 SCRA 566 (2000) Ronulo vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 182438, July 2, 2014 F. Marriage License (Articles 3 (2), 4 (1), 4 (3), 35 (3), 9 — 2l[refers to the administrative requirements], 27 — 34) Nifial vs. Bayadog, G.R. 133778, Mar. 14, 2000 De Castro v De Castro, G.R. No. 160172, February 13, 2008 Republic v Dayot, G.R. No. 175581, March 28, 2008 Abbas vs Abbas, G.R. No. 183896, January 30, 2013 Sy vs. CA, G.R. No. 127263, April 12, 2000 Alcantara vs. Alcantara, G.R. No. 167746, Aug. 28, 2007 Kho v Republic, GR No. 187462, June 1, 2016 Il. EFFECT OF DEFECTIVE MARRIAGES ON THE STATUS OF CHILDREN A. If marriage is voidable — FC 164, 178 B. If marriage is terminated ~ FC 143 C. If marriage is void ~ FC 165, 54 (@ Exceptions: FC 36, 53 Ill. MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE (ARTICLES 22 AND 23) IV. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNULMENT OR DECLARATION OF NULLITY FC48, 53 Enrico vs. Medinaceli, G.R. No. 173614, September 28, 2007 Carlos v Sandoval, GR 179922, December 16, 2008 Ablaza v Republic, G.R. No. 158298, August 11, 2010 Aurelio v Aurelio, GR 175367, June 6, 2011 Republic v CA, G.R. No. 159594, November 12, 2012 Mendoza v Republic, GR 157854, November 12, 2012'V. FOREIGN MARRIAGES AND FOREIGN DIVORCES, mee (a) Asto form, NCC 17 (1) and (2) iN (b) As to substantive requirements, NCC 15 & 17 (3) FC 26; FC 21, FC 10, FC 35(1), 35(4), 35(5), 36, 37 & 38 RP vs. Orbecido, G.R.No. 154380, Oct. 5, 2005 Area vs Javier, July 31, 1954 enchavez v. Escafio, 15 SCRA 355 Van Dorn v. Romillo, 139 SCRA 139 Somera v. Pilapil, 174 SCRA 663 Quita vs CA, 300 SCRA 406 Llorente vs CA, 345 SCRA 592 Garcia vs. Recio, 366 SCRA 437 Corpus v Sto Tomas, G.R. No. 186571, August 11, 2010 Llave v Republic, GR 169766, March 30, 2011 Fujiki v Marinay, G.R. No. 196049, June 26, 2013 Lavadia vs. Heirs of Luna, G.R. No. 171914, July 23, 2014 3+Noveras v. Noveras, G.R. No. 188289, August 20, 2014 Edelina T. Ando v DFA, G. R. No. 195432, August. 27, 2014 VI. EFFECTS OF DEFECTIVE MARRIAGE ON PROPERTY RELATIONS merle hep 2 5 tine FC 52, 53, 50, 147, 148, ace] lea \% Ocampo v. Ocampo, G.R. No. 198908, August 03, 2015 VI. RULES ON FORFEITURE OF THE SHARE OF THE GUILTY SPOUSE FC 43 (2), 50 (1), 63 (2), 147, 148 Y Quiao v Quiao, G. R. No. 183622, July 4, 2012 VII. WHEN THERE IS DELIVERY OF PRESUMTPIVE _LEGITIMES FC 102 (5), 43 (2), 50 (2), 51, 102 (5), 63 (2), 102, 129, . spray 135 iF ved rar 2% pring v Dino, GR 178044, January 19,2011 ¥¥u v Reyes-Carpio, GR 189207, June 15, 2011 IX. LEGAL SEPARATION 1. Grounds for legal separation — Art. 55 FC, RA 9262 10Kalaw v Fernandez, GR 166357, September 19, 2011 BBB v AAA, G.R. No. 193225, February 9, 2015 2. Defenses in actions for legal separation — FC 76.60 Lapuz v. Eufemio 43 SCRA 177 Ne Matubis v. Praxedes 109 Phil 789 (2) Consent FC 56(2); NCC 100 Matubis v. Praxedes, supra People v. Sansano 50 Phil 73 People v. Schneckenberger 73 Phil 413 (6) Condonation FC 56(1) Ginez v. Bugayong 100 Phil 616 (©) Recrimination FC 56(4) Brown v. Yambao 102 Phil 168 (4) Collusion/Mutual Consent FC 60 FC 56(3), (5), compare with NCC 101 and 221(3) Brown v. Yambao, supra Ocampo v. Florenciano 107 Phil 35 Mendoza v Republic, GR 157854, November 12, 2012 Republic vs Encelan, G.R. No. 170022, Jan. 9, 2013 3. Court procedure in legal separation FC 58-60; Sec 19, RA 9262 No confession of judgment, FC 48; of, NCC 2035 4. Effect of pendency of the petition (@) cooling-off period, FC 58 u(©) right of consortium, FC 61 par. 1 (c) administration of property, FC 61 par. 2 (a) Support and custody pendente lite 5. Effects of decree of legal separation (a) On personal relations, FC 63 (b) On the custody of children, FC 63(3); FC 213 (©)_On property relations, FC 63(2), FC 64, FC Art. 102 (4), 129 (7) Quiao v Quiao, G. R. No. 183622, July 4, 2012 Noveras v. Noveras, G.R. No. 188289, August 20, 2014 (d) On support, FC 198 (e) On the use of surname, NCC 372 (8) On hereditary rights, FC 63(4) 8. Reconciliation, FC 65-67 9. Effects of reconciliation, FC 65, 66 X. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SPOUSES 1. General rule and exceptions - FC 68 — 71; FC 72, 100; 127; 101, NCC 921 (4) Goitia v. Campos-Rueda, supra Arroyo v. Vasques-Arroyo 42 Phil 54 Ilusorio vs. Bildner, G.R. No. 139789. May 12, 2000. 2. Designation of domicile - FC 69 mano 3. Joint management of family life - FC(70, 94 (last par.), 122, 146 4. Joint Obligation to Support - FC 70,194, 94 (1), 122, 146 5. The right to exercise a profession or calling, FC 73 as amended by RA 10572 (May 24, 2013) 6. Related rights/obligations MEMENIE 912 104 12 7a th Wo2I}r29 + ded Omerbinndt of 1317"Rep. v Molina, G.R. No. 108763 February 13, 1997 XI. PROPERTY RELATIONS OF THE SPOUSES A. Marriage settlements, FC 74, 75, 130 (3); 103 (3) 1. Form & registration requirement, FC 77, NCC 1357, 1358, NCC 709 Valencia v Loquiao, GR 122134, October 3, 2003 2. Donations propter nuptias, FC 81 cf. Art. 86 (1), FC 82 — 87, NCC Arts. 748-749, NCC 761, NCC 765; FC Art. 50; 43 (3), FC 48; 44; 61 Solis vs Solis, 53 Phil 912 [1928] Mateo vs Lagua, 29 SCRA 864 3. Parties to a marriage settlement - FC 78, NCC Art. 38, 39, FC 79, RPC 34, FC 135 (1) 4. Which law governs property relations - FC 80, NCC 16 and 17. 5. Void donations by the spouses, FC 87 Matabuena v. Cervantes 38 SCRA 284 Arcaba vs. Tabancura, G.R. No. 146683. Nov. 22, 2001 B. Absolute community of property (ACP) — FC 88, 91, 92, 93 1. When applicable, FC 75, 103 (3); 130 (3); 92 @) 2. Commencement, FC 88 3. Waiver during marriage, FC 89 4. Waiver after marriage, FC 89 par. 2 ef NCC Art. 168 5. Suppletory rules: Co-ownership, FC 90; of NCC 484-501 6. What constitutes ACP, FC 91 Memorize! 13(a) All property at time of marriage (b) Property acquired subsequently (c) Winnings from gambling, FC as of NCC 164 (€)_ Presumption of ACP, FC 93 of NCC 160 Muller v Muller, G.R. NO. 149615, August 29, 2006 Beumer v Amores, GR 195670, December 3, 2012 7. What is excluded from ACP, FC 92; FC 95 Abrenica v Abrenica, G.R. No. 180572, June 18, 2012 8. Charges upon ACP, FC 94 (a) Family expenses cf. FC 100 (3), FC 121(5) and FC 94 (4), (5) (b) Debts of spouses, Art. 94 (2) and (3) (c) Subsidiary liabilities, Art. 94 (9) Buado vs. CA, G.R. No. 145222, April 24, 2009 (d) Sole obligations of a spouse, Art. 94 (e) Gambling losses, FC 95 (f) Other charges, Art. 94 10. Administration and enjoyment of ACP (a) Joint administration, FC 96; FC 90 Dar v Legasto, G.R. No. 143016, August 30, 2000 Cotoner vs. Revilla, G.R. No. 190901, November 12, 2014 (b) Sole administration (1) incapacity, FC 96 (2) — no court order (2) separation in fact FC 100 (3) — with court order (3) abandonment, FC 101 ~ with court order (5) pendency of legal separation proceeding, FC 61 — with court order (c) Disposition and encumbrance, FC 96-98, Matthews vs. Taylor, GR 164584, June 22, 2009 41411. Effect of separation de facto, FC 100; 101; ef. FC 239 — summary proceedings for court authority to dispose 12. Effect of abandonment, FC 101, FC 72 — damages, rescission/nullity of a contract 13. Dissolution of ACP, FC 99, 102, 43 (2); FC 63(2), 104 (a) Death, FC 103 ef. Rule 73 Sec. 12 ROC Heirs of Go v Servacio, GR 157537, Sept. 7, 2011 (b) Legal separation, FC 63(2); FC 66 (©) Annulment and declaration of nullity, FC 50 in rel. to FC 43 (2) (@) Judicial separation of property, FC 134-138 Ugalde v Ysasi, GR 130623, February 29, 2008 Lavadia vs. Heirs of Luna, G.R. No. 171914, July 23, 2014 Noveras v. Noveras, G.R. No. 188289, August 20, 2014 14. Effects of dissolution (@) Liquidation procedure, FC 102 (cf 106, 129[7]) Quiao v Quiao, G. R. No. 183622, July 4, 2012 (b) For cause other than death, FC 43 (2); FC 63(2); 147; o Termination due to death, FC 104 Dino v Dino, GR 178044, January 19, 2011 Yu v Reyes-Carpio, GR 189207, June 15, 2011 C. Conjugal parmership of gains Quiao v Quiao, G. R. No. 183622, July 4, 2012 Orpiano vs Tomas, G.R. No. 178611, Jan. 14, 2013 1. When CPG commences and applies (a) Marriages under FC, FC 107 cf. FC 88, FC 89 (b) Marriages before FC, FC 105(2) of FC 256(c) Suppletory rules, FC 108 ef. NCC 1767-1768 2. What is included in the CPG, FC Art. 106 a. Presumption of CPG, FC 116 Titan v David, G-R. No. 169548, March 15, 2010 Imani vs. Metrobank, G.R. No. 187023, November 17, 2010. Dewara v Lamela, GR 179010, April 11, 2011 Lim v. Equitable PCI Bank, G.R. No. 183918. January 15, 2014. b. What are included in CPG, FC 106, 117, 115, 118, 119, 120 Villanueva vs CA, 427 SCRA 439 Mendoza v. Reyes 124 SCRA 154 De La Pena v Avila, Feb. 2012 3. What is excluded from CPG, FC 109 Laperal v. Katigbak, 10 SCRA 493 Francisco v CA, 1998 Tan v Andrade, GR 171904, Aug 7, 2013 Veloso v. Martinez, 28 Phil 255 Berciles v. GSIS,128 SCRA 53, cf. FC 115, Plata v. Yatco, 12 SCRA 718 4. Administration of exclusive property (a) By the spouse-owner, FC 110 (b) By the other spouse, FC 110 2nd par; FC 142, 75, 227 Veloso v. Martinez, supra Manotok Realty v. CA, 149 SCRA 372 Ong vs CA, 204 SCRA 297 5. Encumbrance/disposition of exclusive property, FC 111 as amended by RA 10572, FC 112, Wong et al. v. IAC 200 SCRA 792 6. If property bought by installments, FC Art. 118, 119 16Jovellanos v CA, G.R. No. 100728 June 18, 1992 Tarrosa vs. De Leon, GR 185063, July 23, 2009 7. Improvements on CPG property, FC 120 Munoz, Jr. v Ramirez, GR 156125, August 25, 2010 Padilla v Padilla, October 4, 1943 Padilla v Paterno, December 26, 1961 Coungeo v Flores, 82 Phil. 284 8. Charges upon and obligations of CPG, FC 121, 122, 123 Mariano vs CA, 174 SCRA 59 Ayala vs CA, 286 SCRA 272 Ching vs CA, 423 SCRA 356 Homeowners vs. Dailo, G.R. 153802, Mar.11, 2005 Ando v Campo, GR 184007, February 16, 2011 Security Bank vs. Mar Tiera Corp., G.R. No. 143382, Nov. 29, 2006 Ravina v Villa-Abrille, GR No. 160708, Oct. 16, 2009 Hernandez v Mingoa, G.R. No. 146548, Dec. 18, 2009 Fuentes v Roca, GR No. 178902, April 21, 2010 Aguete v PNB, GR 170166, April 6, 2011 Pana vs. Heirs of Juanite, Sr., G.R. No. 164201, December 10, 2012 9. Ownership, administration and enjoyment (a) Joint administration, FC 124 ef. FC 96, 142 Homeowners ys. Dailo, G.R. No. 153802, Mar. 11, 2005 Alinas vs Alinas, GR No. 158040, April 14, 2008 Docena vs. Lapesura, 355 SCRA 658 Aggabao vs. Parulan, G.R. No. 165803, Sept. 1, 2010 (b) Sole administration (1) Incapacity, FC 124, 253 Uy vs. CA, 346 SCRA 246 (2) Separation in fact, FC 100 (3), 127(3), 253 (3) Abandonment, FC 101, 128, 253 (4) Pendency of legal separation proceedings, FC 61 10. Disposition and encumbrance, FC 124-125; FC 97, 121, 122Cheeseman v. IAC 193 SCRA 93 Frenzel vs. Catito, G.R. No. 143958, July 11, 2003 Alinas vs. Alinas, G.R. No. 158040, April 14, 2008 Siochi v Gozon, G.R. No. 169900, March 18, 2010 Aguete v PNB, GR 170166, April 6, 2011 Flores v Lindo, GR 183984, April 13, 2011 11. Effect of separation de facto, FC 127, FC 100 ef. FC 239 Noveras v. Noveras, G.R. No. 188289, August 20, 2014 12. Effect of abandonment, FC 128 cf. FC 101 Partosa-Jo v. CA 216 SCRA 693 Noveras v. Noveras, G.R. No. 188289, August 20, 2014 13. Dissolution of CPG, FC 126, 129 Cabreza v Cabreza, GR 171260, September 11, 2009 Heirs of Go v Servacio, GR 157537, Sept. 7, 2011 Ugalde v Ysasi, GR 130623, February 29, 2008 Dino v Dino, GR 178044, January 19, 2011 Yu v Carpio, GR 189207, June 15, 2011 Quiao v Quiao, G. R. No. 183622, July 4, 2012 Barrido v. Nonato, G.R. No. 176492, October 20, 2014 Noveras v. Noveras, G.R. No. 188289, August 20, 2014 D. Regime of separation of property (a) In the marriage settlements, FC 143-146 (b) When mandatory, FC 103 & FC 130 (c) Reconciliation in legal separation, FC 66(2) (4) Judicial separation of property, 134 - 146 Ugalde v Ysasi, GR 130623, February 29, 2008 Noveras v. Noveras, G.R. No. 188289, August 20, 2014 E. Property regime of unions without marriage 1, Unions under FC 147, 6, 35, 36, 53 Valdes v. QC RTC, G.R. No. 122749, July 31, 1996 Carino vs. Carino, GR 132539, February 3, 2001 Gonzales vs Gonzales, 478 SCRA 327 Difio v Difio, GR. 178004, January 19, 2011 Salas, Jr., v Aguila, G.R. No. 202370, SEP 23 2013 Barrido v. Nonato, G.R. No. 176492, October 20, 2014 182. Unions under FC 148, 35, 37, 38 Belcodero v. CA 227 SCRA 303 Agapay vs Agapay, 276 SCRA 340 Tumlos vs. Sps. Fernandez, G.R. No. 137650, Apr 12, 2000 Atienza vs.de Castro,G.R. No. 1695698, Nov. 29, 2006 Signey v SSS, GR No. 173582, Jan. 28, 2008 Borromeo vs Descallar, GR No. 159310, Feb. 24, 2009 Heirs of Maramag vs De Guzman, GR 181132, June 5, 2009 Lacbayan v Samoy, GR 165427, March 21, 2011 Go- Bangayan v Bangayan, G.R. No. 201061, July 3, 2013 Lavadia vs. Heirs of Luna, G.R. No. 171914, July 23, 2014 Tambuyat v. Tambuyat, G.R. No. 202805, March 23, 2015 Fullido v Grilli, G.R. No. 215014, February 29, 2016 XI. THE FAMILY, FC 149-'151, NCC 2035, Tribiana vs.Tribiana, G.R. No. 137359, Sept. 13, 2004 Hiyas Savings vs. Acufia, G.R. NO. 154132, August 31, 2006 Heirs Of Favis, Sr. v Gonzales, et al., GR. No. 185922, Jan. 15 2014 [tonovise 9B By 1 os XII. FAMILY HOME, FC 152-162 [exclude FC 157, 161, 162] xv °F Patricio vs. Dario, G.R. No. 170829, November 20, 2006 |_ 4 Arriola v Arriola, GR 177703, January 28, 2008 Modequillo v. Breva, 185 SCRA 766 Cabang vs Basay, GR No. 180587, March 20, 2009 Ramos v Pangilinan, GR 185920, July 20, 2010 Equitable v OJ Mark, G.R. No. 165950, August 11,2010 De Mesa v Acero, Jan. 16, 2011 Fortaleza v Lapitan, GR 178288, August 15, 2012 f Eulogio v. Bell, G.R. No. 186322, July 08, 2015 XIV. PATERNITY AND FILIATION A. Concept of patemity, filiation and legitimacy, FC 163 B. LEGITIMATE CHILDREN, FC 164, Angeles vs Maglaya, 469 SCRA 363 SSS vs. Aguas, GR. 165546, Feb. 27, 2006 Basbas v Basbas, G.R. No. 188773, September 10, 2014 191. Who are considered legitimate children A. LEGITIMATE PROPER, FC 164 (a) Conceived during marriage ef. ROC Rule 131 Sec. 3(dd) FC Art. 168 Arbolario v CA, G.R. No. 129163, April 22, 2003 1. valid marriage 2. terminated marriage under FC 42 in rel. to FC 43(1) 3. void marriages under FC 53, 36 4. voidable marriages, FC 45 Suntay v Suntay, GR 132524, Dee. 29, 1998 (b) Born during marriage (©) Conceived by artificial insemination cf. NCC 40, FC 164 2. Proof of Filiation Of legitimate children, FC 172-173 (2p mewe Trinidad vs. Court of Appeals, 289 SCRA 188, April 20, 1998 De Jesus vs. Estate of Juan Gamboa Dizon, 366 SCRA 499 Ong vs. Diaz, December 17, 2007 Tison vs. Court of Appeals, 276 SCRA 582, July 31, 1997 Aguilar v Siasat, G.R. No. 200169, Jan. 28 2015 3. Rights of legitimate children, FC 173-174, NCC 364, 374, 376, NCC 888, NCC 979 4, Grounds to impugn legitimacy, FC 166 (a) Physical impossibility of access Andal v. Macaraig, 89 Phil 165 Concepcion vs. CA, G.R. No. 123450, Aug. 31, 2005 (6) Biological or other scientific grounds, FC 170, 171 Estate of Rogelio Ong v. Minor Joanne Diaz, G.R. No. 171713, Dec. 17, 2007 Lucas v Lucas, GR No. 190710, June 6, 2011 B FRE-Matits MARE ACE (Cena Lan) WO LONETK puMsHARLE (woe 28)(c.) FC 166(3) 5. Action to impugn legitimacy Reyes vs. Mauricio, G.R. No. 175080, November 24, 2010 Republic v Magpayo, GR 189476, Feb. 2, 2011 Geronimo v. Santos, G.R. No. 197099, September 28, 2015 6. Effect of a mother’s declaration, FC 167 7. In subsequent marriages, FC 168, 169 People v Quitoriano, January 20, 1997 8. Presumptions, FC 170, 171 4, ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN 1. Who are considered illegitimate, FC 165 Joanie Surposa Uy v Jose Ngo Chua, G.R. No. 183965, September 18, 2009 2. Rights of illegitimate children, FC 173, 172, 175-176 Maramag vs De Guzman, GR 181132, June 5, 2009 De la Cruz vs Gracia, G.R. No. 177728, July 31, 2009 Gotardo v Buling, GR 165166, August 15, 2012 Grande v Antonio, G.R. No. 206248, February 18, 2014 3. Proof of filiation, FC 175 Jison vs. CA, 286 SCRA 495 Rivero v CA, G.R. NO, 141273, May 17, 2005 Heirs of Gabatan vs CA, GR 150206, March 13, 2009 Dela Cruz vs.Gracia, G.R. No. 177728, July 31, 2009 Lucas v Lucas, G.R. No. 190710, June 6, 2011 Gotardo v Buling, GR 165166, August 15, 2012 Perla v Baring, GR 172471, November 12, 2012 4. Compulsory recognition, of. RPC 345 People vs. Magtibay, G.R. No. 142985. Aug. 6, 2002 People v Abella, G.R. No. 177295, January 6, 2010 People v. Gersamio, G.R. No. 207098, July 08, 2015 215. LEGITIMATED CHILDREN 1, Who may be legitimated, FC 177, RA 9858 Abadilla vs Tabiliran, 249 SCRA 447 2. How legitimation takes place, FC 178, FC 180 3. Retroactivity and effects, FC 180-181 4. Action to impugn legitimation, FC 182 5. Rights of legitimated children, FC 179 6. ADOPTED CHILDREN Lazatin v. Campos, 92 SCRA 250 Cervantes v. Fajardo, 169 SCRA 575 R.A. 8552 (Domestic Adoption Law) R.A. 8043 (Inter-Country Adoption Law) Bartolome vs. SSS, G.R. No. 19253, November 12, 2014 Oribello v CA, G.R. No. 163504, Aug. 5 2015 1. Who may adopt ~ Sec. 7, 8552 Michelle Lim, GR 168992, May 21, 2009 Republic v. Toledano, 233 SCRA 9 2. Who may be adopted ~ Sec. 8 3. Need for consent —Sec. 9 Landingin vs. RP, G.R. No. 164948, June 27, 2006 4. Effects of a decree of adoption, Secs. 13, 16, 17 and 18 Tamargo v. CA, 209 SCRA 518 Cervantes v. Fajardo, 169 SCRA 575 Stephanie Garcia, 454 SCRA 541 Bagayas vs Bagayas, G.R. Nos. 187308, Sept. 18, 2013 5. Rescission of adoption, Sec. 19, 20 Lahom vs. Sibulo, G.R. No. 143989, July 14, 2003 22XV. SUPPORT A. What comprises support, FC 194 B. Who are obliged to provide support, FC 195, 196, 199 Pelayo v. Lauron, 12 Phil 453 Sanchez v. Zulueta, 68 Phil 110 De Asis vs. CA, G.R. No. 127578, Feb. 15, 1999 Rondina v People, GR 179059, June 13, 2012 Gotardo v Buling, GR 165166, August 15, 2012 Perla v Baring, GR 172471, November 12, 2012 Calderon vs Roxas, G.R. No. 185595, Jan. 09, 2013 Lim-Lua v Lua, G.R. Nos. 175279-80, June 05, 2013 Source of support, FC 197-198, cf. FC 49, 70, 94, 121, 122 Lerma v. CA, 61 SCRA 440 Reyes vs Ines-Luciano, 88 SCRA 803 D. Order of support, FC 199, 200, 204 Mangonon vs. CA, G.R. No. 125041, June 30, 2006 Spouses Lim v Lim, G.R. No. 163209, October 30, 2009 E. Manner and time of payment, FC 200-208 F, Renunciation and Termination, NCC 2035; FC 194 G. Support pendente lite, FC 198 XVI PARENTAL AUTHORITY & CUSTODY OF CHILDREN A. Concept of parental authority, FC 209, 211 Medina vs. Makabali, 27 SCRA 502, March 28, 1969 Unson vs. Navarro, 101 SCRA 183, November 17, 1980 In the Matter of the Petition for Habeas Corpus Of Minor Shang Ko Vingson v Cabcaban, UDK No. 14817, January 13, 2014 Caram v Segui, GR 193652, Aug. 5, 2014 [en banc] B. Transfer of PA, FC 210 cf. FC 223-224, FC 234 Eslao vs CA, 266 SCRA 317 23G D. E. F. Gs H, Who exercises PA, FC 211-213 ef. FC 49, 102(6). 129 (9) and 63(2), Art. 176 Unson v. Navarro 101 SCRA 183 Espiritu & Layug v. CA, G.R. No. 115640 (1995) Santos Sr. v. C.A., G.R. No. 113054 (1995) David vs. Court of Appeals, 250 SCRA 82, November 16, 1995 Briones vs. Miguel, G.R. No. 156343, October 18, 2004 Gualberto vs. Gualberto, G.R. No. 154994, June 28, 2005 Salientes vs Salientes, 500 SCRA 128 Grande v Antonio, G.R. No. 206248, February 18, 2014 BBB -versus -AAA, G.R. No. 193225 , February 9, 2015 Bucal v Bueal, G.R. No. 206957, June 17, 2015, Substitute PA, FC 212-214, 216, FC 233 Vancil vs Belmes, 358 SCRA 707 Special PA, FC 218-219, FC 233, cf. FC 221 in rel. to NCC 2180 St. Mary’s vs. Carpitanos, G.R. No. 143363, February 6, 2002 Child Learning Centre vs. Tagario, GR 150920, Nov. 25, 2005 Holy Spirit vs. Taguiam, GR 165565, July 14, 2008 Aquinas School v Inton, GR 184202, January 26, 2011 Effects of PA over the child’s person, FC 220-222, FC 223-224 Cuadra v. Monfort, 35 SCRA 160 Rosales vs. People, G.R. No. 173988, October 8, 2014 Filial privilege, FC 215 Effects of PA over the child’s property, FC 225-227 RA 9231, Secs. 12-B and 12-C Hebron vs. Loyola, G.R. No. 168960, July 5, 2010 Neri v Heirs, GR 194366, October 10, 2012 I. Suspension or termination of PA, FC 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, cf 193 cf. RA 6809 XV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS, FC 356 — 363 24XVI. SUMMARY JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS, FC 238-252 25PROPERTY I. Classification of property, NCC 414 A. Immovable or real, 415 B, Movable, 416, 417 Lopez v Oresa, 103 Phil. 98 Associated Insurance v Iya, 103 SCRA, Tumalad v Vicencio, 41 SCRA 143 Board of Assessments v Meralco, 10 SCRA 68 Berkenkotter c Cu Unjieng, 61 Phil 663 Davao Sawmill v Castillo, 61 Phil. 709 IL. Character of Ownership, NCC 419-425 A. Public domain Government v Cabangis, 53 Phil. 112 MIAA v City of Pasay, April 2, 2009, G.R. No. 163072 MIAA v CA, et al., July 20, 2006, G.R. No. 155650 Republic v Vega, GR 177790, January 17, 2011 Victoria v Republic, G.R. No. 179673, June 8, 2011 Land Bank v Cacayurin, GR No. 191667, April 17, 2013 Dream Village v. BCDA, G.R. No.192896, July 24, 2013 Republic v. Cortez, G.R. No. 186639, February 5, 2014. Fortuna v. Republic, G.R. No. 173423, March 5, 2014 Talayan Holdings, Inc. v Homeowners Association Of Talayan Village, Inc., G.R. NO. 203883, Nov. 10, 2015. B. Patrimonial property of the State Laurel v Garcia, 187 SCRA 797 Rep. v Rizalvo, GR 172011, March 7, 2011 Republic v. Cortez, G.R. No. 186639. February 5, 2014. C. Private ownership, NCC 421 Tan Toco v Muni. Of Iloilo, GR 24950, 25 March 1926 Zamboanga v Zamboanga, G.R. No. L-24440, June 30, 1969 Casimiro v Mateo, GR 175845, July 27, 2011 IIL. Essential Form IV. Designation V. Susceptibility to Substitution 26VI. Aptitude for repeated use, NCC 418 VIL. Susceptibility to Division VII. Existence in Time IX. Dependence Arriola v Arriola, GR 177703, January 28, 2008 BUNDLE OF RIGHTS A. Ownership, NCC 427 - 439 Lunod v Meneses, G.R. No. 4223, August 19, 1908 NAPOCOR ¥y Ibrahim, GR No. 168732, June 29, 2007 Aneco Realty v Landex, 560 SCRA 182 Padilla v Velasco, et al, GR No. 169956, January 19, 2009 Heirs Of Domingo Valientes v Ramas, G.R. No. 157852, December 15,2010 Datu v Lantud, GR 162551, July 18, 2011 Corpuz v Agustin, GR 183822, Jan. 18, 2012 Edralin v PVB, 2011 Ermitano v Paglas, GR 174436, Jan. 2013 Isip v Quintos, G.R. No. 172008, AUG-2012- Villondo v Quijano, C.R No. 173606, December 3, 2012 ‘Top Management v Fajardo, June 15, 2011 Mananquil v Moico, G.R. No. 180076, Nov, 21, 2012 Chung v Mondragon, 179754, Nov. 21, 2012 Paraguya v. Crucillo, G.R. No. 200265, December 2, 2013. Okabe v Saturnino, G.R. No. 196040, August 26, 2014 [en bane] Jose Yulo Agricultural Corporation v. Davis, G.R. No. 197709, August 03, 2015 B. Right of Accession, NCC 440 — 474 Bachrach v Siefert, 87 Phil. 117 Bachrach v Talisay-Silay, 56 Phil. 117 Tuatis v Escol, Oct. 27, 2009, GR No. 175399 ‘Vda, De Roxas v Our Lady’s Foundation, GR 182378, March 2013 Ortiz v Kayanan, 92 SCRA 146 Narvaez v Alciso, July 27, 2009, GR No. 165907 New Regent v Tanjautco, April 16, 2009, GR No. 168800 Fernando v Acuna, Sept. 14, 2011 Galang vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 184746, August 8, 2012. Republic v Santos, November 12, 2012 27Greenacres v Cabral, G.R. No. 175542, June 5, 2013 PNB Vv. Sps. Marafion, G.R.No. 189316, July 1, 2013. Heirs Of Sarili, Et Al y Lagrosa, G.R. No. 193517, Jan. 15 2014 Heirs of Pocido v. Avila, G.R. No. 199146, March 19, 2014. Narvasa v. Imbornal, G.R. No. 182908, August 06, 2014 Spouses Aquino v. Spouses Aguilar, G.R. No. 182754, June 29, 2015 Bliss Development Corp v Diaz, G.R. No. 213233, August 05, 2015 Homeowners v J.M. Tuason, GR 203833, November 10, 2015 C. Quieting of Title. NCC 476-481 Naguiat v Quiazon, G.R. No. 201248, March 11, 2015 De Guzman v Tabangao Realty, G.R. No. 154262, February 11, 2015 D. Co-Ownership, NCC 484 ~ 494 NOTE: Condominium Law, RA 4762 as amended by RA 7899. EXCLUDED Pardell v Bartolome, G.R. No. L-4656, November 18, 1912 Dailisan v CA, 560 SCRA 351 Cruz v Catapang, GR No. 164110, Feb. 12, 2008 Plasabas v CA, March 31, 2009, GR No. 168139 Republic v Heirs, 549 SCRA 58 Monteroso v CA, 533 SCRA 66 (2008) Quimpo v Abad, 545 SCRA 174 (2008) Lacbayan v Samoy, GR 165427, March 21, 2011 Tecson v Francisco, GR 180683, June 1, 2011 Ampil v Manahan, 11 October 2012 Figuracion v Gerilla, February 13, 2013 Ining v Vega, G.R. No. 174727, AUG 1 2 2013 Recio v Altamirano, G.R. No. 182349, July 24, 2013 Teodoro v Espino, et al, G.R. No. 189248, Feb. 5 2014 Arambulo v. Nolasco, G.R. No. 189420, March 26, 2014 Extraordinary Development Corporation v. BICO, G.R. No. 191090, October 13, 2014 Apique v. Apique Fahnenstich, GR. No. 205705, Nov., 2, 2015 E, Possession 1. Possession in the concept of a holder, NCC 525, 554, 561, 952, 1128, 526 Aranda v Republic, GR 172331, August 24, 2011 2. Concept of Owner, NCC 540 28Decaleng v Bishop, G.R. No. 171209, June 27, 2012 Abobon v Abobon, GR 155830, August 12, 2012 Locsin v. Hizon, G.R. No. 204369, September 17, 2014 a. Presumption of just title, NCC 541 Casimiro Development v Mateo, GR 175485, July 27, 2011 b. Good Faith, NCC 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 1132, 1134, 552 Cabigas v Limbaco, GR 175291, July 27, 2011 Trazona, et al. v. Cafiada, et al., G.R. No. 175874, December 11, 2013. Vilbar v Opinion, G.R. No. 176043, Jan. 15, 2014 Homeowners Savings v. Felonia, G.R. No. 189477. February 26, 2014. Rotairo v. Alcantara, G.R. No. 173632, September 29, 2014 c. Bad faith, NCC 549, 1132, 1137, 552 d. Applicable presumptions, NCC 541, 527, 559, 1505, 1132, 1518, 528, 529, 554, 561, 542, 426 Luga v Arciaga, GR 175343, July 27, 2011 3. Acquisition and loss of possession, NCC 531, 532, 555, 1125, 1189, 1120-1124 Republic v Aldana, 175578, August 11, 2010 VSD Realty v Uniwide, GR No. 170677, Oct. 24, 2012 Aldover vs. CA, G.R. No. 167174, September 23, 2013 Nenita Quality Foods Corporation vs. Galabo, et al.;G.R. No. 174191. January 30, 2013 Republic v. Remman, G.R. No. 199310. February 19, 2014 Suarez v. Emboy, Jr., G.R. No. 187944, March 12, 2014 Ocampo v. Dionisio, G.R. No. 191101, October 01, 2014 Novecio v Hon. Lim, G.R. No. 193809, March 23, 2015 Fullido v Grilli, GR 215014, February 29, 2016 F. Usufruct 1, Objects of Usufruct 292. Elements in a Usufruct 3. Classes of Usufruct - NCC 563, 563, FC 226, NCC 564, 756, 863, 869, 564, 574, 573, 564, 598-599, 758-759 4, Rights of Usufructuary ~ NCC 566-569, 438, 570, 571-572, 590, 578-579, 594, 580 5. As to the Legal Right of Usufruct Itself - NCC 580, 572 6. Obligations of the Usufructuary — NCC 583, 586, 599, 585, $84, 587, FC 226, NCC 584 7. During the Usufruct - NCC 589, 610, 590, 591, 592, 593,594, 595, 596-597, 610, 602 8. At the Time of the Termination of the Usufruct — NCC 612 9. Special Cases of Usufruet — NCC 570, 582, 591, 575-576, 578, 600, 598, 573, 574 Fabie v David, 75 Phil. 536 Baluran v Navarro, 79 SCRA 309 Gaboya v Cui, 38 SCRA 85 10.Rights of the Naked Owner — NCC 574, 581 11. Extinguishment of the usufruet, NCC 603, 611, 606, 605, 607, 608, 1381, 709 Calingasan v Rivera, GR 171555, April 17, 2013 12.Conditions Not Affecting Usufruct ~ NCC 609, 610, 607, 608 Albar y Carandang, 106 Phil. 855 G. Easements 1. Characteristics, NCC 613, 617, 618 Privatization v Legaspi Towers, July 22, 2009, GR No. 174957 Velasco v Cui, 105 SCRA 616 Valisno v Adriano, 161 SCRA 398 2. Kinds of easements, NCC 613, 615, 616, 619 La Vista v CA, 278 SCRA 498 Liwag v Happy Glen, July 4, 2012 303. Modes of acquiring easements, NCC 623, 624 Andres v. Sta. Lucia, G.R. No. 201405, August 24, 2015 4. Effects of Easement, NCC 625, 641, 626, 627, 628 Valderrama v North Negros, G.R. No. L-23810, December 18, 1925 Goldcrest v Cypress, GR No. 171072, April 7, 2009 NPC v Heirs of Makabangit, GR 165828, August 24, 2011 Cabahug v Napocor, January 30, 2013 5. Legal Easements - Water Code, Arts. 31-52, NCC 640-641, 642-646, 647, 649-657, 658-666, 667-673 Valdez v Tabisula, 560 SCRA 332 92008 St. Michael v Masaito, GR 166301, Feb. 29, 2008 Quintanilla v Abangan, 544 SCRA 494 Obra v Sps Badua, GR 149125, Aug. 9, 2007 Dichoso v Marcos, GR 180282, April 11, 2011 Regala v Carin, GR 188715, April 6, 2011 Fabie v Lichauco, 11 Phil. 15 6, Other easements ~ NCC 674-676, 677-681, 682-683, 667-673 Calma v CA, 176 SCRA 556 Gancayco v QC, GR 177807, October 11,2011 Unisource Commercial v Chung, July 17, 2009, GR No. 73252 Vergara v. Sonkin, G.R. No. 193659, June 15, 2015 7. Extinguishment of Easements — NCC 631, 655 DIFFERENT MODES OF ACQUIRING OWNERSHIP A. In general, NCC 712 Acap v CA, 251 SCRA 30 B. Modes of Acquiring Ownership 1. Intellectual Creation = Now governed by the Intellectual Property Code and the TRIPS Agreement. 2. Occupation, NCC 713-720 31Palero-Tan v Urdaneta, A.M. P-07-2399, June 18, 2008 3. Law, NCC 681, 1434, 1456 4. Tradition, NCC 1496-1501 5. Donation, NCC 725 — 769 a. Features Seventh Day Adventist v. Northeastern Mindanao, 496 SCRA 215 Talayan Holdings, Inc. v Homeowners Association Of Talayan Village, Inc., G.R. NO. 203883, Nov. 10, 2015. b. Classifications Del Rosario v Ferrer, 630 SCRA 683 Meralco v Martonito, GR No. 192893, June 5, 2013 c. Form Pajarillo v IAC, 176 SCRA 340 Echavez v Dozen, GR 192916, October 11, 2010 d, Distinctions between inter vivos and mortis causa Del Rosario v Ferrer, 630 SCRA 683 e. Limitations a, Who may donate, NCC 735, 41, 1390 (1) b. Who may be a donee, NCC 738 ¢. Void donations, 739 (1), 736, 1409, FC 87/ Insular Life v Ebrado, L-44059, Oct. 28, 1977 Republic v AFP, Jan. 16, 2013 d. Others, NCC 740, 1027, 1028, 1027 (ex par. 4), 741 — 744, 1544, 745, 746 6. Reduction and revocation, NCC 760-773 Central Philippines University v CA, 246 SCRA 511 Lazaro v CA, 287 SCRA 18 Imperial v CA, GR 112483, October 8, 1999 327. Prescription NCC 1106-1155 Solis v CA, 176 SCRA 678 Republic v Rizalvo, GR 172011, March 7, 2011 (a) Distinctions between Acquisitive and Extinctive Prescription Rule 9, Sec. 1 (1997) Sunga v De Guzman, June 19, 1979 Overseas Bank v Geraldez, December 28, 1979 Ledesma v CA, 224 SCRA 174 Tanyag v Gabriel, April 11,2012 Mercado v Espenocilla, February 1, 2012 Fudalan v Ocial, G.R. No. 194516, June 17, 2015 (b) Distinctions between Extinctive Prescription and Laches Miguel v Catalino, November 29, 1968 Lola v CA, 145 SCRA 439 Borromeo v. Almazora, G.R. No. 200558, July 01, 2015 (c) Special Cases Espiritu v CFI, October 31, 1972 Solidarios v Alampay, January 28, 1975 Jalandoni v PNB, October 9, 1981 Republic v CFI, January 27, 1983 8. Succession Modes of Extinguishing Ownership SUCCESSION I. GENERAL PROVISIONS, A. Definition and Concept, NCC 774, 776, 712, 1311 Butte v Manuel Uy & Sons, Inc., No. L-15499, 18 February 1962 National Housing Authority v Almeida, 525 SCRA 383 Estate of Hemady v Luzon Surety, , G.R. No. L-8437, November 28, 1956. Limjoco v. Intestate Estate of Pio Fragante 80 Phil 776 Cabalu v Tabu, G.R. No. 188417, September 24, 2012 B. Subjects of Succession, NCC 775, 902, 782, 887, 1003 331. Who are the subjects? - NCC 775, 782 2. Relationship, NCC 963-969 3. Capacity to succeed a. Determination, NCC 1034, 1039, 16 (2) Cayetano v Leonides, 129 SCRA 522 b, Who may succeed? NCC 1024-26, 1029-30 Parish Priest of Victoria v Rigor, 89 SCRA 493 ¢. Who are incapable of succeeding? NCC 1027-28, 1031-33 d. Effect of alicnations by the excluded heir, NCC 1038 e. Prescription of Action, NCC 1040 C. Object of Succession, NCC 776, 781, 1311, 1429, 1178, 1347 Art. 108, RPC Reyes v Dimagiba, L-5620, July 31, 1954 Estate of Hemady v Luzon Surety, G.R. No. L-8437. November 28, 1956. Guinto v Medina, 50 O.G., #1 Nazareno v CA, October 18, 2000 Heirs of Ureta v Ureta, September 14, 2011 Natividad v Natividad, GR 198434, February 29, 2016 D. Opening of Succession and Its Effects NCC 777, 781, 2263, 2253, 533, 1347, 1461, 130, 132, 390, 391, FC 84, 86 Bonilla v Barcena, No. L-41715, 18 June 1976 Salvador v Sta. Maria, No. L-25952, 30 June 1967 Puno v Puno , G.R. No. 177066, 11 September 2009 Reyes v RTC, G.R. No. 165744, 11 August 2008 De Borja v Vda. de Borja, No. L-28040, 18 August 1972 Lee v. RTC, G. R. No. 146006, 23 February 2004 Sandejas v Lina, G.R. No. 141634, 5 February 2001 Santos v Lumbao, G.R. No. 169129, 28 March 2007 Requisites for the transmission of successional rights 1, Express will of the testator or provision of law 342. Death of the person whose property is the subject of succession 3. Acceptance of the inheritance — NCC 1041-1057 Uson v del Rosario, No. L-4693, 29 January 1953 Pacio v Billon, No. L-15088, 31 January 1961 Reganon v Imperial, No. L-24434, 17 January 1968 Ramirez v Baltazar, No. L-25049, 30 August 1968 Go Ong v Court of Appeals, No. L-75884, 24 September 1987 E, Kinds of succession, NCC 778 1. Testamentary, NCC 779 2. Legal or intestate, NCC 960 3. Mixed, NCC 780 4. Contractual, NCC 130, 1347, 752, FC 84 TESTAMENTARY SUCCESSION IL. WILLS A. Definition, NCC 783 Vitug v CA, G.R. No. 82027 March 29, 1990 B. Characteristics, NCC 783, 839 (3) and (4), 828, 796-798, 777, 818, 784 - 787. Seangio v Reyes, G.R. No. 140372-72, 27 November 2006 Baltazar v Laxa, G.R. No. 174489, April 11, 2012 Pascual v de la Cruz, 28 SCRA 421 Ozaeta v Cuartero, No. L-5597, 31 May 1956 Coso v Fernandez Deza, No. 16763, 22 December 1921 Ortega v Valmonte, G.R. No. 157451, 16 December 2005 De Guzman v. Intestate Estate Of Francisco Benitez, G.R. Nos. 61167-68, 20 January 1989 Vda. De Perez v. Tolete, G.R. No. 76714, 2 June 1994 Dela Cerna v Potot, 12 SCRA 576 C. Interpretation of Wills, NCC 788, 789, 790-794, 930 De Roma v CA, 152 SCRA 205 Dizon-Rivera v Dizon, No. L-24561, 30 June 1970 Vda. De Villaflor v Juico, No. L-15737, 28 February 1962 Solla v Ascueta, 49 Phil. 333 Balanay v Martinez, 64 SCRA 452 D. Law governing form 351. Time of execution, NCC 795 2. Place of execution, NCC 17, 810, 815-819 In re Will of Rev. Abadia, 50 O.G. #9, p. 4185 Fleumer v Hix, 54 Phil 610 Estate of Giberson, 48 O.G. #7, 2657 Dela Cerna v Potot, 12 SCRA 576 Bellis v. Bellis, No. L-23678, 6 June 1967 E. Law governing content 1. Time — NC 2263 2. Successional rights, ete - NCC 16 Estate of Christensen, 61 O.G. #46, p. 7302 Bellis v. Bellis, No. L-23678, 6 June 1967 Cayetano v Leonides, 129 SCRA 524 Il. TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY AND INTENT A. Who may make a will? - NCC 796-803 B. Supervening incapacity — NCC 801 Torres v Lopez, 48 Phil., 77 Baltazar v Laxa, G.R. No. 174489, April 11,2012 See also: Heirs Of Favis, Sr. v Gonzales, et al., GR. No. 185922, Jan. 15 2014 IV SOLEMNITIES OF WILLS A. Kinds of Wills — NCC 804, 810 B. Notarial Wills 1. General requirements — NCC 804 Suroza v Honrado, 110 SCRA 388 Reyes v Vda. De Vidal, No. L-2867, 21 April 1952 Abangan v Abangan, G.R. No. L-13431, November 12, 1919 Lopez v Liboro, No. L-1787, 27 August 1948, 2. Specific requirements ~ NCC 805, 806 Echavez v Dozen, G.R. No. 192916, October 11, 2010 Taboada v Rosal, 118 SCRA 195 36Payad v Tolentino, G.R. No. L-42258, January 15, 1936 Matias v Salud, GR L-10907, Jan. 29, 1957 Balonan v Abellana, 109 Phil. 358 Icasiano v Icasiano, 11 SCRA 422 Nera v Rimando, 18 Phil. 450 Lopez v Liboro, No. L-1787, 27 August 1948 Samaniego v Abena, G. R. No. 145545, 30 June 2008 Lopez v Lopez, G.R. No. 189984, Nov. 12, 2012 Estate Of Abada v Abaja, G.R. No. 147145, 31 January 2005 Garcia v Lacuesta, 90 Phil. 489 Cagro v Cagro, G.R. No, L-5826, April 29, 1953 Azuela v CA, G.R. No. 122880, 12 April 2006 Vda. De Ramos v CA, No. L-40804, 31 January 1978 Garcia v Gatchalian, No. L-20357, 25 November 1967 Guerrero v. Bihis, G.R. No. 174144, 17 April 2007 Cruz v Villasor, 54 SCRA 31 Barut v Cabacungan, G.R. No. L-6285, February 15, 1912 Lee v Tambago, A.C. No. 5281, 12 February 2008 Fernandez v Vergel de Dios, G.R. No. L-2115, February 25, 1924 Villaflor v Tobias, G.R. No. L-27440, December 24, 1927 Javellana v Ledesma, 97 Phil. 258 Gabucan v Manta, 95 SCRA 752 a, Witnesses to a will (i) Who are competent? ~ NCC 820, 821, 824 Gonzales v CA, 90 SCRA 183 (ii) Supervening incompeteney — NCC 822 Gii) Competency of interested witnesses — 823 3. Special requirements for deaf, ete. - NCC 807-808 Garcia v Vasquez, 32 SCRA 489 Alvarado v Gaviola, G.R. No. 74695 September 14, 1993 4. Substantial compliance — NCC 809 Gil v Murciano, No. L-3362, 1 March 1951 Caneda v CA, G.R. No. 103554, 28 May 1993 C. Holographic Wills 1. General requirements — NCC 804 2. Specific requirements — NCC 810, 812, 813 37Roxas v De Jesus, 134 SCRA 245 Labrador v CA, L-83843, April 15, 1990 3. Probate — NCC 811, 814 Azaola v Singson, G.R. No. L-14003, August 5, 1960 Codoy v Calugay, G.R. No. 123486. August 12, 1999 Rivera v IAC, No. L-75005-06, 15 February 1990 Gan v Yap, 104 Phil 509 Rodelas v Aranza, 119 SCRA 16 Kalaw v Relova, 132 SCRA 237 Ajero v CA, No. 106720, 15 September 1994 V. INCORPORATION OF DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE — NCC 827 VI. CODICILS A, Definition - NCC 825 B. Solemnities - NCC 826 VII. REVOCATION OF WILLS AND TESTAMENTARY DISPOSITIONS A, Definition of revocation B. When may revocation be effected, NCC 828 C. Law governing revocation, NCC 829 D. Modes of revocation, NCC 830 E, Doctrine of Dependent Relative Revocation Molo v Molo, 90 Phil. 37 Maloto v. CA, No. L-76464, 29 February 1988 Gago v Mamuyac, 49 Phil. 902 Diaz v de Leon, GR 17714, May 31, 1922 F, Effect of revocation, NCC 831-834 VIII. REPUBLICATION AND REVIVAL OF WILLS — NCC 835-837 IX. ALLOWANCE OF WILLS ~ NCC 838 A. Concept of probate Guevara v Guevara, December 29, 1943 De La Cerna v Potot, December 23, 1964 38Gallonosa v Arcangel, 83 SCRA 676 Nepomuceno v CA, 139 SCRA 206 Rodriguez v Rodriguez, G.R. No. 175720, 11 September 2007 Heirs Lasam v Umengan, G.R. No. 168156, 6 December 2006 Dorotheo v CA, G.R. No. 108581, 8 December 1999 Pastor, Jr. v CA, No. L-56340, 24 June 1983 Jimenez v IAC, G.R. No. L-75773, 17 April 1990 Agtarap v Agtarap, G.R. No. 177099, June 8, 2011 ‘Maninang v CA, No. L-57848, 19 June 1982 B, Necessity of probate De Borja v De Borja, 46 SCRA $77 Roberts v Leonides, 129 SCRA 33 Guevara v Guevara, December 29, 1943 Palaganas v Palaganas, GR No. 169144, January 26, 2011 C. Modes of probate Gan v Yap, 104 Phil 509 Rodelas v Aranza, 119 SCRA 16 D. Requirements for probate of a holographic will — NCC 811 Azaola v Singson, 109 Phil 102 Codoy v Calugay, 312 SCRA 333 E, Effect of allowance of wills Gallonosa v Arcangel, 83 SCRA 676 X. DISALLOWANCE OF WILLS — NCC 839, 1335, 1337, 1338 Baltazar v Laxa, GR. No. 174489, April 11,2012 Pascual v de la Cruz, 28 SCRA 421 ‘Ozaeta v Cuartero, No. L-5597, 31 May 1956 Coso v Fernandez Deza, No. 16763, 22 December 1921 Ortega v Valmonte, G.R. No. 157451, 16 December 2005 XL. LEGITIME A. Concept - NCC 886 Francisco vs Francisco-Alfonso, G.R. No. 138774, March 8, 2001 Spouses Joaquin v CA, G.R. No. 126376. November 20, 2003 Maononsong v Estimo, G. R. No. 136773. June 25, 2003 39B, Who are entitled to legitimes: Compulsory heirs — NCC 782, 887, 902 Rosales v Rosales, 148 SCRA 69 Ining v Vega, G.R. No. 174727, August 12 2013 Uson v del Rosario, No. L-4693, 29 January 1953 Castro v CA, G.R. Nos. 50974-75, 31 May 1989 Tayag v CA, G.R. No. 95229, 9 June 1992 C. Concurrence of compulsory heirs and their corresponding legitimes. NCC 888-890, 892-901, 903, Article 39, P.D. 603, Sec. 18, Rep. Act 8552, FC 189-190 Sayson v CA, G.R. Nos. 89224-25 January 23, 1992 In the Matter of the Adoption of Stephanie Garcia, 148311, March 31, 2005 Reyes v Sotero, GR. No. 167405, February 16, 2006 In re Petition for Adoption of Michelle Lim, 1689921, May 21, 2009 In the Matter of the Intestate Estate of Suntay, 183053, June 16, 2010 Suntay vs. Suntay, GR 183053, October 10, 2012 Bartolome vs. SSS, G.R. No. 19253, November 12, 2014 D. Restrictions regarding the legitime ~ NCC 904, 872, 905-907, 1347 E, Determination or computation — NCC 908-913 Vda. De Tupas v RTC, 144 SCRA 622 Mateo vs Lagua, 29 SCRA 864 Natcher v. CA, G.R. No. 133000, 2 October 2001 COLLATION ~ NCC 1061-1077 De Roma v CA, 152 SCRA 205 Vizconde v CA, 118449, Feb. 11, 1998 Imperial v CA, GR 112483, October 8, 1999 Arellano v Pascual, 189776, Dec. 15, 2010 F. Freedom to dispose free portion — NCC 914 40Principles Affecting Legitime XII. PRETERITION — NCC 854, 906, 855, 918 Seangio v Reyes, G.R. No. 140372-72, 27 November 2006 Ureta v Ureta, Sept. 14, 2011 Reyes v Barreto-Datu, 19 SCRA 85 Aznar v Duncan, 17 SCRA 590 Balanay v Martinez, 64 SCRA 452 Acain v CA, 155 SCRA 100 Nuguid v Nuguid, 17 SCRA 449 Cayetano v Leonides, 129 SCRA 522 Escuin v Escuin, 11 Phil 332 XIIL RESERVA TRONCAL — NCC 891 4 Mendoza v De los Santos, GR 176422, March 20, 2013 Chua v CFI, 78 SCRA 406 Solivio v CA, G.R. No. 83484 February 12, 1990 Laserna v Vda de Corsino, L-14603, 29 April 1961 Edroso v Sablan, 25 Phil 295 Sienes v Esparcia, | SCRA 750 Florentino v Florentino, 40 Phil 480 Nieva vs. Alcala, No. 13386, 27 October 1920 De Papa v Camacho, 144 SCRA 281 Padura v Baldovino, 104 Phil 1065 Gonzales v CFI, 104 SCRA 161 Carillo v De Paz, No. L-22601, 28 October 1966 XIV, DISINHERITANCE ~ NCC 915-923 Ching v Hon. Rodriguez, Nov. 28, 2011 Principles Affeeting the Freely Disposable Portion XV. INSTITUTION OF HEIRS A. In General Definition, NCC 840 Requisites for valid institution of heirs. See NCC 785, 787 . Effect if will institutes no heir, NCC 841 . Freedom of disposition, NCC 842 Bebe Ureta v Ureta, Sept. 14, 2011 415. Manner of designating an heir, NCC 843-844 in rel to 789 6. Disposition in favor of an unknown person, NCC 845 7. Disposition in favor of a definite class, NCC 845 in rel to 786 8. Equality of heirs, NCC 846, 848 Dizon-Rivera v Dizon, No. L-24561, 30 June 1970 9. Individuality of institution, NCC 847 10. Simultaneity of institution, NCC 849 11. Institution based on a false cause, NCC 850 Austria v Reyes, 31 SCRA 754 12, Shares in the institution, NCC 851-853 13. Predecease of heirs, NCC 856 B. Kinds of Institution 1. Simple or Pure, NCC 777 2. Conditional, NCC 871 a. Kinds Vda de Kilayko v Tengco, 207 SCRA 600 b. Inoperative Conditions, NCC 872-874, rel to 1183 c. Disposition Captatoria, NCC 875 d. Compliance, NCC 876-877, 2™ par. e. Effect, NCC 1034 3% par., 879, 880, 881, 884 3. Institution with a Term a. Kinds - NCC 885 1* par. b. Effect - NCC 878, 885 2™ par. in rel 880 4, Modal Institution, NCC 882-883 XVI. SUBSTITUTION OF HEIRS A. Concept — NCC 857 B. Kinds — NCC 858 1. Simple or common ~ 859 2. Brief or compendious — 860 3. Reciprocal — 860 4. Fideicommisary — 863-869 42‘Vda. De Mapa v. CA, No. L-38972, 28 September 1987 Palacios v Ramirez, 111 SCRA 704 Crisologo v Singson, 49 SCRA 491 Rodriguez v. CA, No. L-287334, 28 March 1969 PCB ve Eewlin C. Time-limitation on inalienability - NCC 870 XVI. LEGACIES AND DEVISES — NCC 924-959 Fernandez v Dimagiba, 21 SCRA 428 Det @59 Belen v BPI, L-14474, Oct. 31, 1960 Villanueva v Branoco, GR 172804, January 24, 2011 LEGAL OR INTESTATE SUCCESSION XVII. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. In general I. When does it take place? NCC 960 2. Who are the intestate heirs? NCC 961 Rodriguez et al. v. Borja, et al., No. L-21993, 21 June 1966 De Los Santos v. De La Cruz, No. L-29192, 22 February 1971 Bagunu v. Piedad, G.R. No. 140975, 8 December 2000 Heirs Of Pascasio Uriarte v. CA, G.R. No 116775, 22 January 1998 Calimag v Heirs of Macapaz, GR No. 191936, June 1, 2016 3. Order and share in the intestate succession — 962 B. Right of representation — 970-977, 982, 902, 992, 1005-8 Abellana v Ferraris-Borromeo, 14 SCRA 986 Diaz v IAC, 150 SCRA 645 De La Puerta v. CA, G.R. No. 77867, 6 February 1990 Teotico vs. Del Val, G.R. No. L-18753, March 26, 1965 Sayson v. CA, G.R. Nos. 89224-25, 23 January 1992 Delgado v Rustia, 480 SCRA 334 Ang v. Pacunio, G.R. No. 208928, July 08, 2015 XIX. ORDER OF INTESTATE SUCCESSION A. Descending Direct Line, Arts. 978-984 Bolanos v Bernarte, G.R. No. 180997, Nov. 17, 2010 43B. Ascending Direct Ling, Arts. 985-987 C, Illegitimate Children, Arts, 988-994 Del Prado v. SantoS, No. L-20946, 23 September 1966 Vda. De Crisologe V. CA, No. L-44051, 27 June 1985 Cacho v, Udan, No. L-19996, 30 April 1965 Corpus v. Corpus, No. L-22469, 23 October 1978 Manuel v. Ferrer, G.R. No. 117246, 21 August 1995 Leonardo v CA, 120 SCRA 890 Diaz v IAC, No. L-66574, 17 June 1987 and G.R. No. 66574, 21 February 1990 Suntay v Cojuangco, 621 SCRA 142 D. Surviving Spouse, Arts. 995-1002 Santillon v Miranda, 14 SCRA 563 E. Collateral line, Arts. 1003-1010 Bicomong v Almanza, 80 SCRA 421 Abellana v Borromeo, 14 SCRA 986 F. The State, Arts. 1011-1014 PROVISIONS COMMON TO TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSION XX. Right of Accretion A. Concept - 1015-1017, 1019-1020 Heirs of Soliva v Cenon, G.R. No. 159611, April 22, 2015 B. In legal succession — 1018 C. Testamentary - 1022-1023 XXI1. PARTITION AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ESTATE A. Partition — 1078-1090 [exclude NCC 1058-1060] * Quasha v. Len Construction, G.R. No. 174873, 26 August 2008 Dimayuga v. Court Of Appeals, L-48433, 30 April 1984 Raquel Chavez v IAC, L-68282, Nov. 8, 1990 Fajardov Fajardo, G.R. No. L-32195, August 19, 1930 44Legasto v Verzosa, G.R, No. L-32344, March 31, 1930 Tuason v Tuason, GR L-3404, April 2, 1951 Alonzo v IAC, 150 SCRA $17 Doromal v CA, L-36083, Sept. 2, 1975 Bautista v. Bautista, G.R. No. 160556. 3 August 2007 @ Non v. Ca, G.R. No. 137287, 15 February 2000 Bautista v Grifio-Aquing, 166 SCRA 760 De los Santos v De la Cruz, 37 SCRA 555 Alsua Betts v CA, 92 SCRA 332 Ureta v Ureta, Sept. 14, 2011 @Notarte v Notarte, G.R. No. 180614, Aug. 9, 2012 @Casilang v Casilang-Dizon, GR 180269, Feb. 20, 2013 Marcos v. Heirs Of Isidro Bangi, G.R. No. 185745, October 15, 2014 Marcelo v Marcelo, GR 209651, Nov. 26, 2014 Spouses Villafria v. Plazo, G.R. No. 187524, August 05, 2015 Oribello v CA, G.R. No. 163504, Aug. 5 2015 ‘Exclude: Executors and administrators (Arts. 1058-1060, Civil Code), which will be covered under Remedial Law 45