You are on page 1of 2

In 1972 Ferdinand Marcos declared Martial Law with Proclamation 1081.

He did it, he said, to save the


Republic and to create what he called a "New Society." A whole generation of Filipinos now exists which
only has the faintest recollection -- if at all -- of the Marcos dictatorship. Kids, this is what you missed.
Perhaps it's what you should pass on when you have kids of your own.

The lies. The biggest lie -- the mother lie -- was that Martial Law was imposed for the good of the people.
It was not. It was imposed for the good of the Marcoses and their cronies, to keep them in wealth and
unassailable power forever and ever amen. Marcos was a congenital liar: he lied about the state of
emergency. He lied about his ill-gotten wealth ("what ill-gotten wealth?", he would ask amusedly."Tell
you what, if you can find it we'll split it". Shows how reliable his word was). He lied about his war
medals (almost all of them were fake), he lied about his father's wartime heroics (it turned out Marcos Sr
was a collaborator executed by the guerrillas), he lied about his health. He lied about holding free
elections and dismantling Martial Law. He lied and lied and lied. This was the man Joseph Estrada
wanted to give a hero's burial.
The fear. Anybody could be picked up at anytime for any reason by the military or the police. You could
wind up a detainee, or you could just vanish, a "salvage" victim. If you protested against the government,
you were labeled a "subversive" or a "communist" or both and you were summarily arrested. People the
government didn't like were tailed by security elements, their telephones tapped. A student who spoke up
to Imee Marcos was murdered. No two words were more invoked and abused for the purposes of
oppression than "national security." People were afraid to speak out. Marcos logic being what it was, the
silence meant the people were happy.
The injustice. Only Marcos and his cronies, who plundered the economy, were protected by the law.
Nobody else was. Arbitrary arrest, detention, salvaging and torture were the standard. The Defense
Minister -- a man named Juan Ponce Enrile -- said in 1982: "We presume that priests and nuns charged
with subversive activities are guilty until the courts decide whether they are guilty or not." On one
occasion the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, someone named Enrique Fernando, servilely held an
umbrella over Imelda Marcos' head.
The censorship. It was only when rebel soldiers finally seized a TV station in the EDSA uprising that
people saw in their sets just how big the crowds were. Up until then the media were strictly controlled.
Journalists who wrote against the regime -- most of them were women -- were routinely "invited" for
questioning by the military. There was no transparency whatever. There were only three national
broadsheets, the Times Journal, the Daily Express and the Bulletin Today, all of them offering the same
pro-administration pap. The chief Marcos mouthpiece was a columnist named Teodoro Valencia. He died
in 1986 and is now considered the "dean" of Philippine journalism. In 1983, when Ninoy Aquino was
buried, at least one million people accompanied the funeral cortege as it wound its way through Manila.
The next day, the Bulletin scarcely mentioned the story, instead playing up a story about a man struck and
killed by lightning at the Luneta Park.(Recently, Joseph Estrada extolled the Bulletin as his idea of a good
newspaper).
The poverty. Poverty increased from 24% in 1974 to 40% in 1980 and why not? Imelda Marcos was
using the Philippine National Bank as her private piggy bank. One of her ideas of dealing with the poor
was to put up whitewashed walls around the squatter areas in Manila. The walls are still there.
The corruption. There were suspicions about the Marcoses dipping into the public till. After EDSA,
dazed investigators realized that the truth far outstripped the suspicions. The Marcoses had been screwing
the public even before Martial Law. As early as 1968 Ferdinand and Imelda had already salted away more
than $900,000 in Zurich accounts under the names "William Saunders" and "Jane Ryan." It was the initial
deposit in what would turn out to be a mountain of loot. After having tracked down Marcos accounts and
properties all over the world, investigators still aren't sure that they've found all the ill-gotten wealth.
The US support for the regime. The US loved their bases in the Philippines and put up with Marcos as
long as they could. When George Bush, who was US vice-president then, visited Manila for a sham
inauguration of Marcos, he proposed a toast to the dictator, saying "we love your adherence to democratic
principles and to the democratic process."

You might also like