CORDILLERA CAREER DEVELOPMENT COLLEGE COLLEGE OF LAW Buyagan, Poblacion, La Trinidad, Ber CIVIL PROCE Course Outline / Sabus ~ Second Sefhester - SY 2017-2018 but must be for both. "Eleanor Roosevelt WEEK ONE t INTRODUCTION TO Civil PROCEDURE ‘What is Remedial Law? What is Civil Procedure? 1, Ordinary civ’ actions (Rules 1 to 56, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure) 2. Provisional «.medies (Rules 57 to 61) 3. Special civil actions (Rules 62 to 71) ‘What are some of the laws governing Civil Procedure? * The 1997 Rules °f Civil Procedure ~ Rules 01 to 71 of the Rules of Court, as amenc The Rules on Summary Procedure. © Republic Act No. 7691 — An Act Expanding the Jurisdiction of the MTC, MCTC, amending BP No. 129. © The Rule of Procedure for Small Claims Cases (A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC, Effective October 01, 2008). * The Provisions of the 1991 Local Government Code on Katarungang Pambarangay. ‘What is jurisdiction? What is procedure? ‘What is a court? ‘What is the hierarchy of courts? © Four levels of courts: (sc) ©. Supreme Co {CCDC~ COULEGE OF LAW- CVE PROCEDUTu Summary of stages in Ci © Court of Appeals (CA) © Regional Trial Court (RTC) o MTC, MeTC, MTCC, MCTC I Procedure — * Filing of the actic # Issuance of summons and voluntary appearance ~ © Incidents after court acquires jurisdiction over the parties — © Answer + Joinder of issues © Pre-trial Deposition and Discovery © Trial * Incidents after tria| but before judgment + Judgment © After judgment — motion for reconsideration © Appeal and review * Execution and satisfaction of judgment. WEEK TWO JURISDICTION ‘What is jurisdiction? How is jurisdiction acquired? Estoppel — © Under the principle of estoppel in jurisdiction, a party cannot invoke the court's jurisdiction or actively participate in the proceedings before said court anc accept Judgmerst only if favourable, and attack it for lack of jurisdiction when adverse. What is the extent of jurisdiction? ‘What determines jurisdiction of courts over civil cases? BP 129 as amended by R.A. 7691; Rule 2, Sec. 5, 1997 Rules of Court R.A. No. 7691 (took effect April 15, 1994) R.A. No. 7691: “...where the value of x xx in controversy exceeds ic eee en teem nem (CCDC COLLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE OUTLINE ~ SYLLABUS - 2” SEM. = SY 2013-2054 Page?E, Metropolitan Tri! Courts / Municipal Circuit Trial Courts / Municipal Trial Courts / Municipal Trial Courts in Cities Original exclusive jurisdiction Concurrent with RTC: Delegated Special Summary Proce’ none ure Cases ‘What is the doctrine of hierarchy of courts? Some notes on jurisdiction — © Quzttion of jurisdiction over the person must be timely raised in a motion to igh an affirmative defense in an answer, otherwise, this Is © Where a party himself invoked the jurisdiction of the court and then questioned its lack of jurisdiction belatedly after judgmert was rendered against him, principle of laches or estoppel apply. © Question of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any stage of the proceedings since such is conferred by law. © Where the cis not paid in full, the court is not obliged to dismiss the case but cirects the filing party to pay the balance of the filing fee specified pe:iod but within the prescriptive or reglementary period. MM THE 1991 REVISED RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (SP) Scope / Cases covered ~ © Civil Cases © Criminal cases Determination of applicabilivy — The rules on — © Pleadings (NOTE: A’! pleadings must be verified.) © Duty of court © The Rules on Answer ‘CCDC COLLEGE OF LAW- CVI PROCEDURE COUR \ITUIN® SYLLABUS - SEM. SY 2073~ 2014 Page a= Anything that exceeds 300K is RTC jurisdiction, © Partido ng Wianggagawa vs. COMELEC © Racaza vs. Gozum, © Reyes vs. So’ 2mar © MERALCO vs. ERB, 485 SCRA 19). ‘What is residual jurisdiction? What is the jurisdiction of the different level of courts as to subject matter? 1. ORIGINAL jurisdiction © Original Exclusive © Original Concurrent 2. APPELLATE jurisdiction A. Supreme Court Original EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction Original CONCURRENT jurisdiction with the CA Original CONCURRENT jurisdiction with the CA and the RTCs Original CONCURRENT jurisdiction with the RTCs APPELLATE jurisciction B. Court of Appeal © Original EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction © Original CONCURRENT jurisdiction APPELLATE jurisdiction C. Sandiganbayan ‘© Original EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction CONCURRENT with the SC APPELLATE jurisdiction D. Regional Trial Courts (RTCs): Original exclusive jurisdiction (refer to notes on R.A. No. 7691) Original concurrent jurisdiction Appellate jurisdiction Family Courts (RTCs in areas where no Family Court is designated) Exclusive and original jurisdiction {CCDC COLLLEGE OF LAW- VIL PROCEDURE COURS: 1 iE SYLLABUS ~ ?° SEM. SY 20132014 PagesVv vi (CDC COLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE OUT Effect of failure to answer Preliminary Conferen Submission of Affidavits and Position Papers Judgment ited Pleadings THE PROVISIONS OF THE 1991 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE (LGC) (REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7160) ON KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY RA. No. 7160: Sections 399 to 422, Chapter 7, Title One, Book III Sec. 399 — Lupong Tagapamayapa (LT) Sec. 402 ~ Functions of LT Sec. 404 — Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo (PT) Sec. 408 ~ Subject matter for amicable settlement Sec. 409 — Venue Sec. 410 ~ Procedure for Amicable Settlement Sec. 411; Sec. 412 Sec. 413 ~ Arbitration Sec. 415 Sec. 416 ~ Effect of amicable settlement or arbitration award Sec. 417 ~ Execution Sec. 418 — Repuciation: THE RULE OF PROCEDURE FOR SMALL CLAIMS CASES (A.M. No. 08-8-7-5C, Effective October 01, 2008) Sec. 4. Applicabill Sec. 5. Commencement of Small Claims Action — Sections 9 ~1 Sections 17 - 19 Sections 21 ~ 24 REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7691 — AN ACT EXPANDING THE JURISDICTION OF THE METCs, MTCs, MCTCs, MTCCs. Sec. 1. Amends Sec. 19 of BP Blg. 129 (The Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980). SYLIABUS 2 SEAL SY2083- 2004 PopesRTC shall exercise exclusive orig. jurisdiction over what cases? Sec. 3. Amends Sec, 33 of P Blg. 129: Exclusive orig. jurisdiction of MeTC, MTCs, MTCCs, MCTCS in civil cases — 1. FE and UD cases 2. I actions which involve title to or possession of real property or interest therein where the value (assessed) does not exceed P20,000.00 (M-does not exceed P50,000.00), exclusive of interest. © NOTE: For real properties, consider assessed value. Sec. 5 — WEEK FOUR Vil RULE 1 OF THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 1 — Vill VENUE (RULE 4, 1997 RUL!'S OF CIVIL PROCEDURE) ‘What is venue? ‘Where is the venue of real and personal actions (Sections 1 & 2, Rule 4)? * Remember: © Location of pros-sty © Real actions are :hose affecting title to or possession of real property © Personal actions - venue is where the plaintiff resides, OF v.... © in case of 2 non-resident D, venue is where P resides or where D may be found, at the election of P. (© The action is reat if the principal relief affects title to or possession of real property, otherwise, it is personal © Actions or cases =ffecting personal status of plaintiff, venue is place of residence of plaintift. © Actions affectin: property of non-resident D located in the Phil. - venue is location of proper’ ‘© United Overseas Bank v. Rosemoore Mining, March 12, 2007 (CCDC™ COLLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDUR: ~ COURSE OUTLINE SYLLABUS 2 SEM. ~SY 20132044 Pages1x Is venue waivable or subje~’ to stipulations by the parties? When is there improper venue? PARTIES TO CIVIL ACTIONS (RULE 3, 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE) Who are the parties to civil actions/cases? © Generally called plaintiff and defendant. ‘Who have the legal capacity to sue and be sued? Lack of legal capacity to suc v. lack of personality to sue — + Evangelista v. Santiago, 157 SCRA 744 © Domingo v. Carague. 456 SCRA 450 What are juridical persons? Foreign corporations (private) ~ What is the term “Doing business” ~ Foreign Investments Act of 1991 — © phrase includes “soliciting orders, service contracts, opening offices (whether liaison offices or branches), appointing representatives or distributors domiciled in the Philippines or who, in any calendar year stay in the country for a period of 180 days or more, participating in the management, supervision or control of any domestic firm in the Philippines. What is the isolated jurisdiction rule? ‘Who is a real party in interest? Who is a representative party? An indispensable party? A necessary party? What is a class suit? What is the concept of joincier of parties? ‘What is the rule on substitution of parties? Who are the alternative and unknown defendants? What is an indigent party? rn rere senses een ete ‘€cDC-- COLLEGE OF LAW- CIVIL PROCEDUR: COURSE OUTLINE ~ SYLLABUS 2 SEM. SY 2013-2014 Page?What is an impleader? What is the so-called “Ancillary jurisdiction”? © RTC have jurisdiction over 3"-party complaint although amount claimed Is below its jurisdiction amount © Venue of 3"-party complaint has to yield to venue of main action. ‘What is the rule on intervention? Rule 19, Sec. 1, 1997 Rules of CP — ‘What is interpleader? Cases — Domingo v. Scheer, 421 SCRA 468 Uy v. CA, 494 SCRA 535 Alfelor v. Halaso:,, March 31, 2006 Perez v. CA, Jan. 27, 2006 Hinog v. Melicor, 455 SCRA 460 Dela Cruz v. Joaquin, July 28, 2005 Limbanan v. Acosta, June 30, 2008 WEEK FIVE X PLEADINGS (RULE 6 to RULE 13, 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE) Pleadings defined — What are the common requireinents for all pleadings? ‘What is the certificate of non-forum shopping? Who executes certificate of non-F§ for a corporation? Notes on Certificate of Non ~ Forum Shopping ~ +The cert. of non-F$ is required only in a complaint or other initiatory pleading. ‘+ What distinguishes a motion from a petition or other pleading is not its iorm or the title given by the party executing it, but rather its purpose. Cases — © Aoaasv. CA, 49! SCRA 353 © PAL. FASAP, Jan. 2:4, 2006 (© International Cor: "ction v. Feb Leasing, April 22, 2005 Sear TTaEEET == cee ‘CCDC COLLLECE OF LAW- CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURS! /TLNE = SYLABUS SEM. SY 2013 — 2011, PagesSps. Arquiza vs. CA, ‘Asaphil Cons'n vs /vason 50B SCRA 583 Saludo Jr. vs. Arc. Express Int'l, Inc. Solmayor vs. Ai oyo 486 SCRA 326 Citibank N.A. vs. Sabeniano Yu vs. PCIB Carpio v. Rural Bank, May 4, 2006 Korea Exchange v. Hon. Gonzales, April 15, 2005 Prejudicial question in relation to non-FS — Judicial courtesy in relation to non-FS— ‘© Republic v. Sanciyanbayan, June 26, 2006 Notes on COMPLAINT: * Test of sufficiency of complaint Capacity of plaintiff (P) and defendant (D) must be alleged. Allegations must be in methodical and logical for. 2 oF more causes of actions must be stated separately. Plead actionable document (AD) properly. Allege citcurstonces constituting fraud or mistake with particularity but malice, inte, or other conditions of the mind may be averred generally. © Prayer for ro'ief must be consistent with allegations of cause of action. ooc00 Splitting and joinder of causes of action — Misjoinder of causes of action NOT a ground for dismissal — How do you plead an actionable document? The answer - © Negative defense © Affirmative defense: What can plaintiff do in case of defective answer (REMEDIES): © Judgemen on the pleadings may be filed (Rule 34); © Motion for summary juagment may be filed (Rule 35) The counter-claim and cross-claim ~ The reply — Soma enrtliemnseunestareaneeeateanenanilltiaeerereratiinetereaadtemmeesasaa eaten (CCDC COLLLEGE OF LAW CVI PROCEDURE ~ COURS TLNE~ SYLLABUS 7 SEMC~SY 2013-2034 PagesAmendment of pleaciings / Supplemental pleadings ~ * How to amend When to amend Amendment by Implication Supplemental pleadings — Periods for Pleading The NEYPES rule — Filing and Se of Pleadings ~ © Filing © NOTE: Date of mailing is the date of filing ~ NOTE: Filing of pleading shall be done personally. © NOTE that filing of pleadings includes the payment of docket and other lawful fees. * Service of pleadings — ‘© the act of providing a copy of the pleading upon che party or his unsel, if there is a counsel, unless service upon the party himself is ordered by the court. 3 modes of service of pleadings ~ * Personal service @ Ser ice by registered mail © Substituted service The rule on priorities in modes of service and filing — The rule on service of judgments, orders or resolution — © By personal servic © By registered mail; © By publication of the order or judgment at the expense of the prevailing party, ONLY WHEN summons was served by publication. The rule on completeness of service — © Pevsonal service is complete upon actual delivery: * Service by ordinary mail is complete upon expiration of 10 days after mailing, uniess the court provides otherwise; {€CDC™= COLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE QUT NE~ SYLLABUS - 2 SEM. SY 2013-2034 Page 10+ Service by registered mail is complete upon actual receipt by the ackiressee or after 5 days after he received the first notice of ‘he postmaster, whichever Is earlier. The rule on proof of service WEEK SIX XI OBJECTIONS TO PLEADINGS The objections or attack to the pleading may be in the form of a: «motion to dismiss: motion to suspend proceedings: mo'ion for bill of particular motion to drop/add parties; motion to severe cause of action; motion to strike out: motion for judgment on the pleadings: motion for summary judgement. The instances when the court may, MOTU PROPIO, dismiss a complaint — It has no jurisdiction over the subject matter; + There Is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause; ‘The action is barred by prior judgment or statute of limitations: * The plaintiff fails to appear on the date of the presentation of his evidence in chief. Grounds for dismissal of complaint on motion of defendant — © Lack{of jurisdiction + Improper venue Lack|of legal capacity to sue Litis pendentia Stanuite of Limitations (prescription of actions) Res Judicata — tie binding or “preclusive effect of a judgment”, Sec. 47, Rules 39, 1997 Rules of CP. (CCDC COLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCE SCOURS OUTLINE STLABUS- 2 SEM.~SY 2013-2014 PagerThe requirements for the application of RJ — + The former judgment or order is final: * The judgment or final order Is one which Is rendered on the merits: © The judgment was rendered by a court having jurisdiction to pronounce the same or final order: © Idenity of parties, of subject matter and cause of action, The 2 aspects of res judicata — * “Bar by prior judgment” + “Estoppel by judgment” or “conclusiveness of judgment The principle of “law of the case” as against res judicata — Grounds for dismissal of complaint on motion of defendant (continued): * Insufficient allegations Payment, waiver, abandonment, extinction © Statute of Frauds Non-compliance with condition precedent for filing Lack of ce’ tification against forum-shopping Pleading esserting claims states no cause of action The concept of a judicial compromise — XI SUMMONS (RULE 14) Purpose ~ Definition ~ Contents of summons ~ Extra-territorial service ~ service outside the Philippines ~ allowed only in special cases — + like when the action is against a non-resident D NOT found in the Phil., or i i ee (CCDC COLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE OUTLINE SYLUABUS 7 SEM. ~ SY 2013 2034 Page* when the action is in rem or quasi in rem, cv when the devendant ordinarily resides in the Philippines but is temporarily out of it. To be effective, extra-territorial service of summons MUST be with leave of court and only thru the following means ~ ‘+ Pe'sonal service: * By publication, together with a copy of the summons and order of the court which must be sent by registered mail fo the last known address of D: * Any other manner which the court may deem suffici nts Modes of Service of Summons ~ When Defendant (D) is a Natural Person — Personal service * Substituted Service * Service by publication, sometimes known as Constructive Service Service of summons on entities — Summons on special classe: of persons — Proof and return of service — Voluntary appearance — Cases ~ * Robinson v. Missiles, Dec. 12, 2006 © Miranda v. Tula, March 31, 2006 © Cezar v. Ricafoi,-Bautista, Oct. 31, 2006 a ee ee ‘CCDC -COLLLEGE OF LAW- CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE OUTLINE = SYLLABUS - 2" SEM. SY 2013-2014 PagesWEEK EIGHT XIIL_ MOTIONS (Rule 15) ‘What is a motion — ‘What are the requisites of a valid motion — Form of motions and Hearing of motions ~ Omnibus motion AND omnibus motion rule — Motion to dismiss: Procedure / Grounds (Rule 16) — © When to file ~ © Grounds ~ Court has no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant Court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter Venue is improperly laid Plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue Litis pendentia Res Justicata Prescription ~ Statute of Limitations The claim or demand has been paid, waived, abandoned or otherwise extinguished. Requisites of Lis Pendens / Litis Pendentia ~ Requisites of Res Judicata ~ Failure to state a cause of action vs. Lack of cause of action — Lack of legal capacity to sue vs. Lack of legal personality to sue ~ Motions — (a) To suspend proceedings (b) For bill of particulars (c) To drop / add parties (d) To severe cause of action (e) To strike out re tee (€CDC™ COLLEGE OF LAW- CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURS: OUTLINE ~ SYILABUS - 7° SEM. SY 2013 Page(8) For judgment on the pleadings (g) For summary judgment WEEK NINE XIV DISMISSALS AND DEFAULT: Dismissals + Upon plaintiff's notice = On plaintiff's motion = Due to plainviff's fait Defaults ~ Grounds for declaration of default — Effects / consequences of default cicclaration — Relief from order of default — Summary of remedies against judgment by default — Extent of relief awarded on a default judgment — Actions / cases where default is not allowed — Cases — OB. Jovenit v, \.scaimir Realty, March 28, 2006 Cruz v. CA, Feb. :3. 2008 CAV. Alvarez, Lc. 3, 2006 Pinga v. Santiago, June 30, 2000 Perkin Elmer v. Dakila Trading, Aug. 14, 2007 Gajudo v. Traders Roya! Sank, March 21, 2006 Martinez v. Republic, Cct. 30, 2006 XV MODES OF DISCOVERY Concept and Purpose — © Ong v. Mazo. 431 SCRA 56 ce es ee conan tant steer enaneanet (€CDC™ COLLLECE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURS (21 Ne ~ SYILABUS 2° SEM. —SY 20132014 Page 15= Republic = Marcelo 2». Suneganbovan 204 SERA 212, 200 w Sengonbo one Aug. 28-2007 Determination of application — © Lafiada v, CA, 375 SCRA 543 Modes of Discovery * These © Fortune moces'are cumulative Corp. v. CA. 229 SCRA 355 Deposition: Definition — + Ayala Land v. Tagle, Aug. 11, 2005 + Hyatt | Deposition — * Deposi = Depos (€CDC™ COLLEGE OF LAW- CVI PROCEDUP industrial v. Ley Construction, March 10, 2006 ition pane action (Rule 23) Before MTC and RTC With Leave of Court Without leave of Court Scope of Examination \When and How depositions are conducted Effect df error: and irregularities in depositions Caringa v. CA, June 6, 2001 Vorsn v. CA, 157 SCRA 438 lay v. Dulay, Nov. 11, 2005 fanil Dev. V. CA. July 30, 2001 nerican Airlines v. CA, March 9, 2000 ales v. Sabino Dec. 9, 2005 jembo v. CA, 250 SCRA 404 ‘athay “acific v. Spouses Fuentebella, Dec. 15, 2005 = of Pedro Pasag v. Spouses Parocha, April 27, 2007 ion before action or pending appeal testimony of a witness for use in the future Who may file the petition Formalland jurisdictional requisites Contents of the petition Notice ana service Depositions pending appeal are taken with the view to their being used in the event of further proceedings in the court of origin or the appellate court. ‘Sine Of testimony — objective is to perpetuate the emcees ee UTLIN SYLLABUS 2° SEM.~ SY20%3—20%4 Pages Cour2 ocsinv.Sandiganbayan, Aug. 9, 2007 (ern Dep. of try, Api 5, 2005 Dual Function of Deposition ~ interrogatories to parties — + Purpose anc dature * Service and fajlure to serve * Distinction be een deposition (Rule 23 and written interrogatories (Rule 25) Admission by adverse party (Rule 26) .equest for admission — + Purpose and sfope © Procedure | © Implied admission — © Effect and Remedy riboneria v. CA, 216 SCRA 607 Duque v. CA, July 2, 2002 Po v. CA, 164 SCKA 668 DBP v. CA, Sept. 20, 2005 Bay View v. Ker & Cou 116 SCRA 327 Production and inspection #f documents or things (Rule 27) — As distinguished with subpoena duces tecum '¢ Solidbank (Metrobank) v. Gateway, April 30, 2008 © Security Bank v. CA, Jan. 25, 2000 Physical and mental examination of a party (Rule 28) — When applicable © Order of examination Consequences of refusal to {nake discovery (Rule 29) — Sanctions Lafiada v. CA, GiR. No. 102390, Feb. 1, 2002 Nestle Phil. V. CA, G.R. No. 102404, Feb. 1, 2002XVI PRE- TRIAL Nature and purpose — + Anson Ttacle Center v. Pacific Banking, March 17, 2009 } ‘When conducted - Procedure — The pre-trial order - SC Admin. Circular No. 3-99 (Jan. 17, 1999) on pre-trial — Cases on Pre—Trial ~ ‘+ Teresita Monzon v. Spouses James and Maria, Sept. 17, 2008 Frisco F. San Juan v. The Sandiganbayan, August 6, 2008 RN Developmen v. Auli. System, June 26, 2008 J-R. Daan v. The Hon. Sandiganbayan March 28, 2008 Estanislao v. Alviola v. Judge Henry, Feb. 29, 2008 LCK Industries v. Planters, 538 SCRA 634 ‘Mercury Drug v. Rep. Surety and insur. Co., 538 SCRA 464 Republic v. tldefonso Oleta. 530 SCRA 534 Dr. Emmanuel Vera v. Ernesto F. Rigor, 529 SCRA 729 Vivian ¥! Locsin v. The Hon. Sandiganbayan, 529 SCRA 572 Heirs of Vicente Reyes v. The Hon. CA 519 SCRA 250 People v. Nicola: Guzman, 513 SCRA 156 ‘Malayan insur. V. Ipil International 500 SCRA 371 Crisostomo Alcaraz v. CA, 497 SCRA 75 Advance ‘extile v. Willy C. Tan, 464 SCRA 431 Eleuterio Olave v. Teodulo Mistas, 444 SCRA 625 Jonathan Landoil v. Spouses Suharto Mangudadatu, 436 SCkA 559 United Coconut v. Miguel Magpayo. 429 SCRA 669 Procopio Villanucva v. CA, 427 SCRA 439 Sixto m, Bayas v. The Sandiganbayan 391 SCRA 415 Spouses Mondedo v. CA, January 18, 1996 Silvestre Tiu v. Daniel Middleton, July 19, 1999 Air Philippines v. International Bus. Aviation, Sept. 9, 2004 XVI TRIAL Order of Trial — Trial Incidents ~ a ‘CCDC COLLLEGE OF LAW- CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE OUTLINE ~ SYLLABUS 2° SEM. - SY 2013-2014 Page 8Subpoena — Demurrer to Evidence — Cases — ¢ In Republic us. Tuvere * In Manila Banking Corp. vs. Univ. of Baguio + Swagman Hotels v. CA, April 8, 2005 © Republic v. Tuvera, "5. 16, 2007 The Manila Banking “orp. v. UB, Feb. 21, 2007 ELEVEN XVIIL_ JUDGMENTS Requirements for valid judgements ~ Three parts of judgment © The body or the opinion, ©. the disposit've portion, and ©. the signature of the judge Judgments on the Merits — Judgment on the pleadings + Meneses v, Seretary of Agratian Reform, Oct. 23, 2006 Summary Judgment — * Ontimare v. Ele, Jan. 20, 2006 * Asian Construction v. PCIB, April 25, 2006 © Pineda v. Guevara, Feb. 14, 2007 Judgment by Compromise or Upon Con‘ession — Nunc Pro Tune Judgments Judgments for Costs ~ Declaratory Judgments: Declaratory relief actions ~ Foreign Judgments - ee rece eee (CCDC™= COLLLEGE OF LAW GVIL PROCEDURE COUN: OUTLINE SYLLABUS - SEM, SY 20132014 PageWEEK TWELVE XIX MODES OF REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF TRIAL COURT ERROKS Motion for new trial or reconsideration — Petition for relief — Direct attack and collateral sttack — Review and correction by another court on appeal — Modes of appeal ~ Differences among 3 modes of appeal — Procedure on appeal ~ Effects of appeal ~ Remedies in the court which rendered the judgment — * Before finality of judgment: * Motion for Re-onsideration (Rule 37) = Motion for New Trial (Rule 37) based on NDE and FAME © After finality of judgment: * (Petition for relief from judgment (Rule 38) based on FAME Remedies in Higher Courts to which a Judgment is Elevated for Review — Ordinary appeal uncer Rules 40 and 41; Petitions for review under Rules 42 and 43; Petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45: ‘On Ordinary Appeals — Rules 40 and 41 ~ Where and When — How — Instances where ordinary appeal is not allowed ~ Instances when an ordinary appeal maybe dismissed outright by the CA — E sosaapssesensie oe erarsiepenesaecaiereraseiiitierenrerremareereeeeeeemeeme ra (CDC COLLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE "NE = SYLABUS 7° SEM. SY 20132014 Pagez0On Petition for Review ~ Rule 42 + Where and When - = AM.07~7=12 5c, Dee. 4, 2007 Subject — A verified petition Requirements — RTC and the adverse party to be furnished copies of the pe CA may set oral arguments or memoranda Filing of petition stays execution of judgment or final order of RTC unless the CA provides ot!\>rwise, and in civil cases decided under Rules on Summary Procedure ion On Petition for Review Under Rule 43 ~ Quasi-Judicial Agencies — © Where and When © Subject ~ © Averified petition — + Period to file - Grounds for the outrisht dismissal of a Petition for Review — Effect of Absence of or Improper verification — The petition may involve questions of fact, or law, or both. Appeals from decisions of the Ombudsman in administrative disciplinary cases is to the CA via a petition for review «Absence of verification may be a cause for dismissal. = RA. No. 7902 - transferred exclusive jurisdiction of the SC to eview decisions and final orde’s o' the CSC to the CA » Fabian v. Desierto, Sept. 16, 1998 * Perez v. Ombudsman, May 27, 2004 + Section 12, RA. No. 9282 (March 30, 2004) ~ decisions of the CTA reviewable only by the SC via a petition for review on Certiorari under Rule 45 * Section 7 [5], R.A. No. 9282 ~ decisions of the Central Board of Assessment Appeals = AM. No, 049-0 7-5C. Sept. 14, 2004 On Petition for Review on Certiorati uncer Rule 45 — © Where and When ~ * Subject On Petition for Certiorari uncer Rule 65 — © Where © Subject * Nature ee (CCDC COLLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE CUTLINE ~ SYLABUS ~ 2° SEM, - SY 2013-2034 Page>DISTINCTIONS between Rule 45 and Rule 65 — Supreme Court Issuances on Appellate Review ~ AM, No. 00-2-10-5C, May 1, 2000 - Amend. to Sec. 4, Rule 7 & Sec. 13, Rule 41 AM. No. 04-3-15-5C, March 23, 2004 SC Cireular No. 35-98, Aug. 19, 1998 AM, No. 07-7-.2-SC. Dec. 4, 2007 On Annulment of Judgment - + Grande vs. UP ‘= People vs. Bitange (On Verification: + "A pleading is verifies by an affidavit that the affiant has read the pleading and that the allegations thevcin are true and correct of his PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OR BASED ON AUTHENTIC RECORDS.” “In actions filed under Rule 65, the petition shall further indicate the material dates showing = whe» notice of the judgment or final order or resolution subject thereof was received, * when a motion for new trial or reconsideration, if any. was filed, and, = when the r of denial thereof was received.” © Santander Cons'n vs. Villanueva, Nov. 30, 2004 What is the Effect of App | on the Execution of Judgment? Instances when execution is stayed ~ * Ordinary appeals * Generally, in petitions for review * Gen~vally, in appeal by certiorari Instances when execution i: ot stayed ~ + RTC decisions in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction in cases falling under the Rules on Summary Procedure. = RTC decisions in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction when so declared by the CA, ‘CCDC = COULEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDUR® COURSE /TLINE = 5WEEK_T. (RTEEN XIXA CASES ON APPELLATE REVIEW (continuation of topic XIX) — Pilipinas Shell v. Gobonseng, July 21, 2006 ‘Tagabi v. Tangue, ju', 27, 2006 Villanueva v. CA, July 20, 2006 Jaramillo v. CA, G.R, No. 122317uly 14, 2005 Madriaga v. CA, G.R. No. 142001 Santander Construction v. Villanueva, Nov. 20, 2004 Remulla v. Manlongat, Nev. 11, 2004 LR Frults v. WSR Fruits, Nov. 23, 2007 ‘Cucueco v. CA, Oct. 25, 2004 Neypes v. CA, Sept. 1) 2005 Santos v. People, At... 26, 2008 Fil-Estate Properties. Hon. Homena-Valencia, Oct. 15, 2007 Jabaluyas vs. Japson. 142 SCRA 2008 Tolentino vs. Natanauan, Nov. 20, 2003 Republic vs. Asian Consiruction vs, Tulabo: In Provost vs. CA anc Encaiacion vs. Amigo Ross Rica vs. Ong, Avg. 16, 2005 Escueta vs. Lim, Jan... 2007 Provost v. CA, June 26, 2006 Encarnacion v. Amigo. Sept. 15, 2006 Serrano v. Gutierrez, November 10, 2006 XX ENFORCEMENT / EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS / FINAL ORDERS Kinds of execution — Proper time to enforce/execute judgments/final orders — Manner of implementation of wri: of execution ~ Satisfaction of judgment — 2 ways of securing executio': of final judgments — Rules on execution ~ © Balajonda vs. COMELEC © DBP vs. Spouses Gatal © Dagooc vs. F rt ee (CDC™ COLLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE OUTUNE ~ SYLLABUS 2° SEM. ~SY 2013-2014 Page 23XXt PROVISIONAL REMEDIES Common rules regarding provisional remedies — Basic characteristics of provi:'onal remedies — Notice of Ils pendens — Preliminary attachment - © When issued Instances when it may be issued ~ ‘* Requirements for its issuance -— ¢ Discharge and qusshal of writ - Preliminary injunction ~ ‘When issued: Instances when it may be issued — Requirements for its issuance © Discharge and quashal of writ ~ © Remedies against \/ronghifty issued Injunction Receivership — © When issued: Grounds for appointment of receiver ~ * Requirements for its issuance ~ Replevin — © When issued; Insiances when it may be issued — * Requirements for its issuance Alimony pendent lite ~ Differences among provisions! remedies ~ Differences of bonds in provisional remedies ~ Page 24WEEK FIFTEEN XXIL_ SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS Interpleader (Rule 62) Declaratory relief (Rule 63) ~ Certiorari, Prohibition and /viandamus (Rule 65) — Differences ‘Springfield Dev. Corp. vs. Presiding RTC Judge + Holy Spirit Homeowners Assoc. vs. Defensor + Henares Jr. Vs. LTFRE Quo warranto (Rule 66) — * Calleja vs. Panday Expropriation (Rule 67) Foreclosure of real esiate mortgage (Rule 68) — Partition (Rule 69) Forcible entry and Unlawfu! -iciainer (Rule 70) — Contempt (Rule 71) — Differences between direct and indirect contempt — On Expropriation — * Republic us. Guingoy © Masikip vs. City of Posig On Foreclosure of Mortgage + PNB vs. Sanec #Selegna Management vs. UCPS # ps. Arquiza vs. CA On Forcible Entry and Unlav/f| Detainer ~ © Dumo vs. Espinas, |. 25, 2006 © Roberts v, Papio, Fer. 9, 2007 Kinds of Actions to Recover Possession of Real Property — © Accion interdictal (FE and UD) nm Som enero onan (CCDC COLLEGE OF LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE COURS: JTLINE~ SYLLABUS - 1 SEM. = SY 2013 ~2034 Pages+ Accion publicians * Accion reivindicatoria Cases — Atuel vs. Vaiclez, July 10, 2003 Aliabo vs. Carampatan, March 16, 2001 Hilario vs. Salvador, April 29, 2005 Barangay Piapi vs. Talip. 469 SCRA 409 Laresman vs. Abellana, 442 SCRA 156 Vaidez vs. CA, May 4, 2006: Santos vs. Sps. Ayon, May 6, 2005: Racaza vs. Gorin, June 8, 2006: Benedicto vs. CA, Oct. 19, 2005: 000000000 WEEK SIXTEEN XXII REVIEW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE XXIV_ FINAL EXAMINATION “There iso sigher court then courts of fstice and that is the court of conscience. It supersedes all other courts.” ‘Mahatma Gandhi RUFUS G. MALECDAN JR. Instructor a tet "CCDC COLLLEGE OF LAW- CVIL PROCEDURE ~ COURSE 0. TINE ~ SYLLABUS = 2° SEN. ~ SY 20152014 Pages: —____ = Ono1q s1 vouse OUT YOIYA od Suiundui 20 xgap au Sunsequoo uf press us9q Sey OM Ayed w jsue6e uoHE Le UI “p ‘vosiad pazuoyine ve vo weaydde aun | axes 20 penoy Buraq sy waxed 0} 10 pasod I Panowes “pajeeoudo usaq sey joas0 { : | | | yoare4p 2ouewuoyad ay w 20 | i | ued fue 40 “Kuadoud ayy. ay ‘payienuoa 40 POUIEISp “aye Aquainpney so Apsnlun Ayodo: Aued osionpe ayy #9 ucjssassod ay} 1aA0901 0} uoRse ue uj “2 | jsuIeBe Aued Bulyre {np jo uone|OIA (rym B 40} 0 “AyDedeD | ay) Aq UoRoe pies & Us wosiad sowie Aur fq Jo ‘yons | wy pasnons 9q yeh | i Se. quowAojda siy jo sino ay) UL "ya;9 40 | juowBpnf juaBe “sey019 2 Jo Jo0yo ul ‘asuenpe 34), oid 10-Ausadoud ode pal 8q 0} Supusd s) ve a10ym unos ayy jo sopic_vodn pans: Apawas jeuoisinosd NOLINISSG i SHIGSW3Y TVNOISIAONd SNOWY SSONANSS510 -atavi SHIGAWAY TVNOISIAOUd 40 SNOSINWdWOD amnpanog waijwawBpnf ay spuas 0} Gupta; pul 30 woe St 40 ‘op 0} Sundwane 3} uosiad @ 10 fou ypelgns oy Sungedsay yueondde | ‘uy JO UoHe|O:A UL AIgeqoxd syoe | UL (8: 0 40 ‘'sauIdUii 24) UI PUNO} YOU s} pI you ssop oym Aped © jsueGe uoyse ue u; !svoypau0 Siy pnesjap 0} 143} “0s op 0} ynoge SI 40 ‘Ayadoid siy Jo pasodsip 10 panouwas sey om Aued e jsueBe UoNDe Ue UI “2 sannows } = Jj salipnr yng feu 10) yooquausa4 fessaaid sore w 30 pajedissip 40 Ayadoid ay 123 1 28e6 0u 12 ‘Buipaaooid 40 uo} nm puny 30 Aodoud @ | 309)0 o1u uawsEpnl au Aueo 0} asinsauyo J0 vonedissip 20 abeisen ue uoy Bumasuoo pue asodind ou) ue 0} somied au He Jo ji249q | Issod vara: ur Auadoud aut or) Bunvasaid ‘conse i dussonaaoy *y | i revorday ‘seaddy jo yn09 ‘nog awesdng pue anes __woraid (0x) 29010 umreason | Keiodwat “e | INYO NYO HOINM, 4unoo | 380uund anpanoid INO. NOWINIZ30Ruadond aij (0 Sriea tawiew jane oy Pp :Apoysno 40 ainzias lyons woy ydwaxa st yeyj ‘pazias Os #110 ‘s)Bay epoysno sepun paseyd as: hi 10 sunog aye} 10 paulensip uaaq jou sey Auadoud ayy “2 ‘9u jo Aouapuad revs uno $jrjaq pue wonewojun | ow 6 iy Aq paureias redowuny seo ‘Bpajmoux siy jo 1899 ay 01 Butpron.e joasayy | 94 0} ep Pue ‘fedounyy | a 0 Aovapued| uonuaiap jo asnes ayy e "hued asianpe | aq 0) pue uosiad soyjoue “vewodonay | su Suunp yo] aur Aq pauieyep AinjBuoum si Auodosd oy, “q | £q pauieiep 40 vane ‘uno | pasedsip 6us09 wor ‘joasaus uotssossod | AypaBae aie Aquses V905 | Kyatod — polars} a nave so “| Buquosap Auaimoued | © Aq pawie Ieuy revowsar: | uj ywanard 0,.| ‘powers Ayadoud au jo Jauo auy idy “2 | jo amnzies ayy _siopi0 3 au 0} 1Da!gS | ue wiBUD jo unoo | yaniavas @ jo | “N09 pies jo i 24 01 parwodde sanisoas 40 yuowiBpnf | siy Aide 0} sasr Paysiiesun pauunjas uaag si i yes ut ca | wwowBpn! au 40 09K8 au) uaa 140 asodsip 0} 10 ‘jeadde ue jo Aouepuad oy ___] Buunp éuadord ot ansasaud 0} ‘iuawSpni soyy “9 | | INS Nvo HOW | —-as0aund "SNnOXS 1409 | : Laseoau/ | fouspuad ay) Bun “009 Anus z uw s2gsnf pue fynbo vouny NYO HOMME Bsowind | ~ SaNn0¥D | iunoo | ae a a binpacong af ‘uDqaIUNG. @ SoH | om pue souns Kew oy s2 sofew | ¥ons 29) payesuadwios Aynj 29 ueD qweoydde aun amy pauictua vossed 20 fyed ay; 0} abewep ojgeredain neo inom joasey 2ouenunUoD 40 souenssi au “sapio Buluressas 10 uuonouniur su) 0} pannus st wesydde | noo aun 29010 j au uGnouie yeu Suey Jaye} Aq paysend.0 pabveyosip uy 30 juawSpn! | ieee | apt ogea ome | Mtr nepiye uodn noo ou jo J9pN0 Ag | aun jo SourDuad atg Sung | _ pie uonow vod Around“ 1500 Jo anisnjxe ‘ywowypeye yo 19910 9 ws un0> 24; Aq paxy rea Owe Ue U apeW s) UD aaa un09 jo. ae Ou | i tay Aued Buwyoene au; 01 papoax | xyaqunes ® 5aij 20 fq paysend”s0 pab. eo ssaun_asea | Bulseay pue uoow ouad aug Bung | _ toda so/eped-xz 3 OuvHOSIO/aATOSSIG NOH | Auauoasa3 | O3INYuO MOH | STevivAY Na) S3IGAW3Y TWNOISIAOUd SO SOLLSIMALOVYVHDO JISvE. calavi saBpnp unog jeu 40} x00qy9U9q{ 3sKe 226u0] OU sana0al e Jo Aysseoou ‘ayy jeyy ouMID}ap feYs uoyoUr uo 10 oudoud njow noo ayy 2 ‘esneo juarauins nau paure}go | sem sanisoas @ yo juauquodde | au yeu umoys sy a | ‘puowayunoa | 2 j0 Aved asvenpe ow Aq Guns “2 noo au _fa_pabeyosip mun suawSpnt iy -aye vane spasdosd ‘uj Jo a6e35 fue 1 soyed-so;u) ‘se oBewep yans 10} payesuadisoo °q ued quenidde Povolua fed ay oy 94 uedn Wm a4) 70 soyves WOH, poued fep-oz ou p uopesdxe [eq 10 uonounian A 10 Wm e J0} oRONdde oy unos ayy Aq uounjosas uody e ‘BUOGTARNIOD @ 30 Bull} | squenndde 94) uodn myns Kew ay | pauiolue aq 0} 1y6nos uosied oy) uodn sovuas woy SKep 02 ueui 20W JON, aued 2g = now 21 30) aBpnr Aq paiue® O¥L — :uondsox3 ‘Gubeay fsewwng) ‘sayed-sejuy ‘amy res8u89 = | { j | | LoszouvHosiciasnqessia MoH ‘amnpadoig tind) ALIALO3S53 OBLNVYD MOH | SIevvay N3HM |#4 Se SoBewep Yons yuepuajep 0} ed Of “q ue ‘patpnipe aq yons y Aued as:aape oy, 01 anja S110 {yadoud ata jo umnjarauy J04 “2 {249 J0 anren 944 aiqnog aigeayade Ayadosd somber ON | paunboy | wnordoy ‘95n29 juan no\M waUNUIOdTE ‘ons paunso:d anew us jueoydde aty aseo 49n384 8 jo juaunuuodde aug yo uosea a weisns feu Ayed asienpe ou caBewep fed of noo ou yw Areuonas081q Paunboy | | __diystonaaay “yt jdce up jew aproap Ayeuy yetys ysn00 ‘vonouniul at jo uoseay Aq Uejsns Aeus Aved asienpe aul uoium saBewep ye ked 01 713784) Yeu api99p Ayeuy nfur Btn yo vosRas Aq | ‘ja; PanHuA jou s ue :Aued assoape 2 29 Kew yoiye s}s00 | Aevonasosip ‘pasnbai | ynoo aug nos eu) YM A:euonas9siq, yno3 at {euonans%¢) ing pounbary juowyoene Aeuuia. “5 ‘GNOYSINTOO 3HLUBGNN SONDVLUBQNA ANNOWY O34INOSY HSHISHM | Acsnss miorsnow ss S3IG3W3Y TWNOISIAONd NI SGNO 30 S3ONANS44I¢C ea1avi ‘s0Bpnr yno9 jews 104 ¥ooqyouag‘aiaeaICae ON aigeandae ON oN, {UeBU}AD B19 TSUIEBe san03 Fe eid ow uaa sabewen vans fed 91 "9 4 Imepuie sJunuIe|d 019 w payers Se Auadoid aun JO anjen ety ajanog 504 z _ inaiday « nos Buy wiv euoRasDSIQ ue Aeuonero9 | om e5r00pe ay a paty si ___un09 oun ym Aewonas961q 50, ome au) Ueno heus ues WoUHDeRe Jo pio Saba 2 Leu Wau ve jo woureg | ou. u wneD ou Aq pany Ith tery $04 _ st oNoawaLNnoo ANnoWw GSTS SBAVALIEBHIBHM | AaaMEEUTYNOISIMOUG | SHLNSONNSONDINSONN | patil : SAIGAW3Y TWNOISIAONd NI SGNOSY3LNNOOD JO S3ONSY3SI0 inpeaoig a palavl‘ipod asians — wapucdsay |____Suyeadde Ae ~ sauonniag Tued Ssianpe ~ wopa0dsey | Suyeodde Aued — sauonned ‘Kued Ssionpe ~ aajeday Buyeadde fed — juetiaddy 01 pouajas ae seed mors “zy L ‘2130 vonsand hug | 7] ue 1 uoasanb : ‘mej PU 15e} Jo uoNseND pus” me} jo uonsanb "yoe} jo uonsanip, Basie ‘uw suonsonb oF sy soped no au; Aq jeadte of aun a4) Jo 1 on unog auasdng oxy Samed sow ayy fq jeadde yt 40 uojesioxa oxy wn anp ui pay swaade syeadéy jo uneo ow, a pannbes vay epueowarl — sopied Jeijo Buy j6 jeadde uoqenidxa aig pue fe uo spicoes aug jo, ade uo p0y04 kq feo naped od — jeadde jo eonou ka reodde ut -c | an 9 jusjodee. wonasag “6 neo ayeyacde au 1s pay 8a 0) wauin20p 9182) (Ag _pasnbas vaya wnpueioway sunbenen | SRR, paxnbos ion. ‘S929 Jaujo pue sBuparcaid jepads uw}| Ried ssiaape — jupuedsay |___sueodde hued sovomag Wp hued asienpe = ywapuodsoy, Buyeodde Ayed — sovomad ~ Tid Sarai ~ aaiooTG _-Suypadde Ayed — sajued jo owen “9 i8VEOLNIO AB W3ddY | tuned areaddy ain yo une sASIARY NO NOLLILS4 eodde Jo vondeped 10} wowaunbas y vo pied jou 4 jessuusip. teadde jo Uon2ayod Jo} aysinbo1 e JON, yeaede jo wowasnbas InyMe| JOUo pue 102 Jo wowAed °S pied al porodde ae suing au ring se tae 9p ecb OS Fo HeND ey ie Saga yo _sesedse jo "imen| sansa ome oie ___ tu mew noida pane t snag | | | Teedde uo pi0s91 nou Aq jeadde A1euIp30, 40 jeadde jo RéEOLLUIO AB WAddY BIARY HOS NOLL ‘WaddV 4O SAGOW (£) SSYHL 3H.L ONOWV SAONSYSISIG | Wadd AuvNIaNO $a1evl s0fnr nog jeu 10} yooqusuaeAynp je6a)2 op 0} vossad e Buipuewuios Apawas Kiojoauig avop q 0} IN SIE 0 suaja1 pue Apawal @njuaraig payewunsucs Apeasje sje 0) suajeu pue Apawias an}99109, Apausas uj jo aunien “y ‘Anp y269) Burney suosiag suojour uw pue jerapnt -jsenb “jepoipn! Burstovex9 suosiag Suonoun} jejipn/-ssenb 20 jetoIpnf Busrasaxe suosiog, qwopuodsey “¢ 92 20 aouewioqsad ayy jadwog | suonouny evojseaus | Ainp ye6a7 Jo jetoipni-ysenb ‘jersipne | | ae Lo eanSnos ow 7 passop | pe 04, po Buse swopuodses hq pawioyod | nea JO VOISSINLOD WAAC OL yoe ue Ayipow Jo jnuue oy | jo asoding “| | snnwanii tl a“ = SNWYGN YW ON NOLLIGIHOd TYVYOILUFO NISML3G SAONAYNSSAIC g93a1avl raveIolLys9 seBpnr nog, yoogysuss‘838384 0} puewap wos Agua aiqiouoy 1 poled | seah- (1) 80 24 SI yUIOd jeu wo “py | 118030 0} gnUTeid 10 Klessaoau jon : WaAoad (sn WUBI UoIssaSsOd 40114 j5 }001g “| peau e 5 aly, met (paau oN ‘SIBDA 0} pueiag “Z| Inpejun Sewooeg y uaW Ine} Kiet —__BuuurBeq ou wow inywejun | vorssassod Sjuepuajap jo ainien €BNIV130 TNMWINN | AULNA T18I04OI YANIVLAG INSMVINN ONY AYLNA a1gI9NOs NFSM139 S3ON3N3S4I0 8a1avL DaWwas ayy J0 a: “pauonsan’ 11 6 vvonaip: Suoyouny 9018x8 Uosied 46 {21 2oIps Layountu 40} uonde ue uy Aye. NOWONNENi NOWLIIHORe NOLLONACNI GNV NOILIGIHONd NSSMLag SHON3YFS4I0 Za7avi ainpanag Yaro ~~ jusuaosidia ue @uy wiod > | uunog awascng pue sjeaddy yo unos "unod reuoifoy aut oo neg owerdng pue sieeddy yo uno “ne3 | voix at sap fo) unt upasso ee | xis Bupsexxa cIOIUNYY | SLC JeUL UNWIN edoWNyy PUe UenodoneY) ‘ec q| eu UL Kop (4) suo Bupssoxe jou juawuosudus, ynog unog ausaicng pue sieaddy jo ‘uno9 jeu euoi69y 943 ut QO'000'0E dug Buipaaaxe | juno ‘unod UL JeUOIBedj ay UI 00°000'Z dud BuIpaaaxa ue sino jeu naa jediowunyy pue UEwiodonay JOU PUB 13NOD jeL1| ynD.I9 jediolUNWy ue LEWodo.1ay) oun 84 U! OO'000'S dye BuIpseoxa jou aul “e | “ediouny au ui 00'00z dud Eurpavoxa jou aug ‘e i suonows “¢ eso | 40) votad e ut pabuapeUD aq Keus ng ~ algereadde jon uaubpni Aauigereadsy -y | wWapuodsay ou vodh ojoues & asodus! Alvewuuns ued unos au) —paau oN Asessanau jons © 10 Ayssa0aN 2 | spa@doud 1dnssons »0 yonsqo | 128U 0S 19 0 au. Wut LAW AdNBINOO 1038i0 | | - _ | idW4LNOD LOAYIGNI GNV Ld WSLNOO LOSyuIG NSaMLaa S3ON3YSS5AI0 6 adv Se6pap unoD Jeuy 10} yooq4>DuAg