Professional Documents
Culture Documents
business
email : teleradiology@hiimpact.in
www.teleradiology.hiimpact.in
Introduction
Teleradiology is the process of obtaining radiological images in one location and transmit them
over other for diagnostic and consultative purpose. Imbalance between the demand and availability
of diagnostic services made way for the need of teleradiology. Moreover, in current scenario growth
of the teleradiology market fuels the emergence of widely available mechanisms that quickly
transmit digital data over large distances. Such mechanisms include picture and archiving
communications system (PACS), digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM), and
radiological information system (RIS).
Teleradiology Market
The teleradiology market in India is expected to exhibit the highest CAGR of 24.1% from
2016 to 2023.
Radio imaging market has grown dramatically in the last decade and a half globally. In the United
States the instance of CT scans have increased from 18 million in early 1990 to about 150 million
now. In India the market for Radio imaging equipment and accessories is growing at 16% CAGR.
There are about 50000 institutes that have x-ray machines installed and about 4000 of these have
a CT scan machine. About 60000 x ray machines are operational in the country.
About 100 million X-Ray scan happen in India every year. The Diagnostics imaging market is
valued at 1 billion USD as of today and is expected to grow to 2 Billion USD in next 3-4 years.
Electrodiagnostic equipment’s constitute about 45% of the market.
By Imaging Techniques
X-rays
Computed Tomography (CT)
Ultrasounds
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Nuclear imaging
Fluoroscopy
Mammography
Others
By Technology
Hardware
Software
o Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS)
o Radiology Information System (RIS)
Telecom & Networking
o Web-Based Teleradiology Solutions
o Cloud-Based Teleradiology Solutions
By End User
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Diagnostic Centers
Others
By Region
North America
o U.S.
o Canada
o Mexico
Europe
o Germany
o France
o UK
o Italy
o Spain
o Russia
o Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific
o Japan
o China
o India
o Australia
o South Korea
o Taiwan
o Rest of Asia-Pacific
LAMEA
o Brazil
o Turkey
o Venezuela
o Saudi Arabia
o South Africa
o Rest of LAMEA
Key Players : The key players in the global teleradiology market are Siemens AG, Teleradiology
Solutions (TRS), Global Diagnostics Limited., Mednax, Inc., Onrad, Inc., Telediagnostics Services Pvt.
Ltd., Everlight Radiology, Agfa-Gevaert Group, Radisphere National Radiology Group, Inc., and
Fujifilm Medical Systems, Inc.
The other prominent players in the value chain include Cybernet Medical Corporation, Spectra AB,
Medica Reporting Ltd., Teleradiology Solutions, Inc., Radiology Reporting Online (RRO), NightHawk
Radiology, Inc., Sectra Imtec AB, StatRad, LLC., Ramasift Inc., and Alta Vista Teleradiology.
Overseas Opportunity: As per the estimation of a leading teleradiology company in US, the
teleradiology market during night is approximately $750 million, and when added to the
weekend and holiday calls, the figures can reach $1 billion to $1.4 billion. Moreover, as per the
reports, current market penetration has reached 40% to 50% approximately. Therefore, it's no
science to conclude that teleradiology companies in India have immense scope when it comes to
making use of the time zone advantage in the imaging world.
GAP : According to industry estimates, with a population of 1.2 billion, India only has around
15,000 diagnostic centres, and the number of radiologists working with them is even lower,
around 10,000. In comparison, the US, which claims to be short of radiologists, still has 25,000 of
them for a population of 350 million.
International outsourcing
India has distinct advantages when it comes to teleradiology; for example:
1. Cost: An MRI in India, performed on a state-of-the-art scanner, costs Rs. 6000 (approx. 150
USD). The professional fee component is usually 10-15%, i.e., 15–25 USD. At these rates,
having an Indian radiologist report outsourced scans can offer a significant monetary
advantage.
2. Cheap labor: The salary of an Indian radiologist working in the field of CT and MRI, 5 years
post-MD (Indian board certification), would usually be close to or less than Rs. 2 lakhs per
month (i.e., approximately 5000 USD per month or 60,000 USD per year)[2]; in contrast, a
comparably qualified radiologist in the USA would be earning approximately 350,000 USD
per year.[3]
3. Time difference: The time difference between the USA and India is a distinct advantage,
especially for nighthawk services. When it is night in the USA, it is daytime in India; this
means that it would be possible for an Indian radiologist, working during the daytime, to
interpret images with better quality and a greater accuracy than would the US radiologist in
his night shift hours.
Ideally, these factors should have led to a significant growth of the teleradiology industry in India.
However, the reality is that except for one company, i.e., Teleradiology Solutions, there is no other
company practicing teleradiology to any significant extent in the country. There are some
enterprises doing preliminary ‘ghost reporting’ for facilities in the USA, but this work is either in
ethical grey zones, if not actually illegal, as far as the USA is concerned though not illegal from the
Indian perspective. A couple of companies, including Wipro Technologies and the Manipal Group of
Hospitals, are now providing teleradiology support for 3D reconstructions, thus speeding up the
work for radiologists and technologists in the USA.. This work does not require board-certification
since there is no actual interpretation being done.
National teleradiology
The main issues affecting the growth of teleradiology within the country are the following:
1. Cost: Radiology studies in this country are priced low, and centers can find it difficult to
afford the services of teleradiologists.
2. Quality issues: Many rural and semiurban centers do not have qualified radiologists but they
do not mind the lack of quality reporting and often leave it to the referring clinicians to read
the images themselves.
Currently, the use of teleradiology within the country is confined to practices with multiple centers
transferring images to each other or to a central hub. Rural-urban or generalists-to-specialists
transfers are not yet very popular, mainly due to cost constraints.
Conclusion
Private hospitals and diagnostic centers, especially in smaller towns face challenges of being able to
recruit and retain radiologists, who tend to prefer to live in metros where the opportunities and
reimbursements are superior. Hence for these, teleradiology is an attractive proposition, as one can
outsource low volumes on a per click basis without having high fxed salary costs.
Finally, there is domestic demand, too, for teleradiologists. According to industry estimates, with a
population of 1.2 billion, India only has around 15,000 diagnostic centres, and the number of
radiologists working with them is even lower, around 10,000. In comparison, the US, which claims
to be short of radiologists, still has 25,000 of them for a population of 350 million