(b) Rockshed tunnel is provided at dangerous gullies crosaing the main roads/railway for protecting the important transportation route against rockfall/slope failure. {c) Retaining wall with net fences on its top is provided along. the dangerous slopes which have important properties and/or transportation routes on or nearby the slopes. Shot-creting works are provided on the slope for not only preventing weathering action but also fixing unstable rocks. Though the appurtenant structures will be required for the definite individual plan in each area, it is considered that the structures explained above are reasonable measures at this stage of study. Besides the matters mentioned above, the following matters are considered for structural plan. (A) Availability of materials Materials usually used in the basin and materials available nearby the site are selected. (8) Easiness of construction Special structures which will have difficulties for construction are avoided. As a conclusion, it is judged that all the structural plans are technically viable. 11-3 Bconomic Evaluation The results of EIRR for structural plan of each divided area are obtained as follows: Group Mean BIRR( i). "AY 6.59 Qda of "1 5.98 Spe of "B" 3.89 As a general, the BIRR of Group "A" is more or less than Group "B", though the EIRR of some areas in Group higher than some areas in Group "A". there is no definite criteria of BIRR for the economic viability, as the conditions of evaluation are different by the country, region, kind of project and etc. However, it is generally said that the disaster prevention project should be viable even in case of comparatively small EIRR such as 2 or 3%. X-11-3Though some areas in Group "8" showed comparatively small EIRR values which are less than 2% or 38, it is considered to be not reasonable to remove these areas from the proposed project. due to the following reasons. fa) (b) te) a The most important and beneficial object is to prevent the traffic blockage of main roads and railway. The project will make full function for this object after all the probable danger areas are protected by the structures, The results of BIRR calculation will be easily changed by the method of assumptions for various conditions such as damage rate of each damageable items, economic development rate in the future and etc. The calculation is made for all the areas by assuming that the construction will start from the fiscal year of 1990 for comparing the results on the same condition. However, it will be actually difficult to start the construction at the same time for all the areas of Groups "A" and "B", If the projects will start later, the EIRR values for these areas will be much higher than the case of earlier start. Most serious damage will be injury and death of human. However, such factor is not counted as a economic loss. It is concluded that the structural plans proposed in areas of Groups "A" and "BY are economically viable as a whole. 11.4 Proposed Structural Plan The structural plans for all the areas in Groups "A" and "B' are to be recommended as the proposed project. ‘the proposed project is summarized in Table X-11-1 where the following items are shown. (a) (b) (c) (a) (e) Name of project areas ‘Type of structural plan (for Qda areas) List of proposed main structures in each area Economic project cost EIRR In addition, the following figures are prepared for brief understanding of proposed project for debris flow and slope failure disaster prevention. (a) Classification of ‘Type of Qda Areas + Fig. -1i-1 x-11-4wy te) ‘The fa) (b) () Proposed Structural Plans for Qda Areas (Schematical Features of 5 types of Structural plan in Quebrada and Proposed Structural Plans for Qda Areas) : Big. X-1-2 Proposed Structures for Spe Areas 1 Fig, X-11-3 reason of project viability is summarized as follows: All the structural plans are technically viable. The economic aspects of structural plans for Group "B" as well as Group "A" are viable as a whole. Social impact will be strong on the safety of human life and the acceleration of regional development. Especially, it is usual to consider the priority on the importance of human life in case of disaster prevention project. X-11-5Tables(2) sesiog + tty kaze guamyoaes 0 ourt 399205 9: Galt # tw eopaoee SUT THSSAE! Jo 90D ee 08 exmaeaey D8) oe! one"? 37309 ° sci 6005, wepunp pt cet’ 00") berm s0' ‘00% cemnzseyon casi 00'9t doen 606" o0E'8 sooy eae ou‘ 005", wrembuess ° oye o00'se coors oe core 000° owen, ogs'z 608: Sarre ce corte seed ose: ooze exes cotta ost ocetet reed oot? oxmnqene) oot!) (erreneseera) sage oes ‘SkemaneD ons" omy 0'3 oowesred Dott ‘c0'8 00's 06's cet 08's ces ¢ a a t 8 daa SB aR 88 13388 ARGS RESRSERRSRERRRERG: 888888 tO = wunnsed soramagse jo omy “OH, & cay t C/) sraee xevuneras dorvm 30 RIMIVEE Waroumya ex oTaELSRRBSRESRRR S8SRR8R88R858 eegsonbey “D ofeysenure) °) a be (c/2) Svaer RWVINETEL YOrH Jo RUMLYEE TaIONTNZ T-e- x OTE, ‘sopreangrn 30 ae on weRS S89 9888 B88R8 RES) Rg ae 288 agaa SRS Geengsn 89 ors6r + sem a ==) 38pg wabeoy : sits aSazeny (©) werasioty aders tazy Seong Tle Ole Ge o we Se ete ca w (en) smmey 201s so panna eto eE~ x TNLgee 88 $8888 8888 ose oor ore 80 03 eds 003 ous f ee 07" 0c 0808 0708 (@) voaea ofors 30 oom & is ES u (2/2) SvREY BeOTS 30 FURIES TWETOMTUE THE x OTEBLTable X-4-1 Galssification of Group A, B or G for Qda Area (1/4) _ We Bistecive Object [Danger] Overall Romans ___| House [Transportation [Public Stusture [Overall Level |(Grovo] = A A 8 c A |B | 8 (cH) (RW) Re % B e xs [6 (cs) ca x c t ALS 6 Ra x 5 c a] 8 | 8 (cH) AB 5 5 5 B [A] 8 [Bisaster (RW.) (club) in March 1987 {MB} Re * 6 € K [AT ®_ [Disaster (CH) lin March 1987 RF x 8 c x | A [A Disaster CH) in March_1987 Fe x 8 € [A] 4_foisaster (cH) in March_ 1987, #S x 3 c a | A | A [Disaster (cH) in March_ 1987, Rio | 8 3 a) a] 8 (RW) (Schoo!) (MB Ait E 8 c Bae (RW. (CH) wise c a es |e R13 c 8 8 6 pay 8. (cH) (Schoo!) (RW) aa | c € (a a Ris [ec B c 8 | A | 8 [Possible secondary (C.H.) disaster due to damm- (RW.) a ling in the main river Rie |e 5 5 B |B |B [Outer of Gdais sot (cH) (Mine) Jctear as a mine is a (RW) located thera m7 [6 3 € BA [8 [Under construction (cH) for relocation of CH. 1 w.) Note; C.H.: Garretora Central (Major National Road) MLR. Main Road RW.: RailwayTable X-4-1 Glassiiication of Group A. 8 or C for Qda Area (2/4) _ No. Protective _ Object Danger|Overall Remarks: House [Transportation [Public Structure [Overalll Level_|(Group) Rie c c B | A | B [dito oor Rid Cc } B A A [Qda runs on tunnel (C.H.-(t)) R.W Station (M.R.) (RW. -(1)2,(b) _L R20 Cc Cc Cc Cc B C {Relocation of C.H. was completed Ret c c c CA of ditto — R22 c c c B +8 ‘C_|ditto— rat Reo a B Cc 8 B B (M.R.~(b)) (R.W.-(b)) 4 R24 B B Cc B B B (M.R.-(b)) (R.W.-(b}) R26 A B B A B B (R.W.-(b)) | (Government Office, School) R26 Cc B Cc Cc R27 c oc TA [Relocation of road is completed and the eee lbridge is high enough | R28 Cc Cc A [New main road crosse: JQda but the bridge is fhigh enough RS c C(B) C © [S| CS |New relocated road is (C-H.-(b)) lunder construction on ithe opposit bank of river R30 B c B Cc c R31 B c B B B [New road is under (C.H.-(b)). I Jconstruction on the (B.W.-(b)) Jopposit bank of. ver | Note; Bridge : Tunnel {c): CulvertTable_X-4-1 Classification of Group A, B or C for Gda Area (3/4) No. Protective Object Bangor} Overali Romarks Tiouse_| Transportation | Public Structure [OveralllLevel_|(Grou Rae a B B A | A | A [Possibiity of dammin Matucanal (CH) (Government in the main river is Otice, School) high. Ras € B 3 > 8 | 8 ) (Mino) Raa c € B [| 8 | 8 |Possibiity of damming in the main river is high R35 5 8 3s | 8 | 6 Station) R36 c c Bol ¢ Ra7 c (By B | 8 | 8 [Railway crosses on (R.W.-(c)) | Intake of Electro} Jembankment with Lima) loulvert channel for JQda, Spoil bank at the confluence, RaE € 5 c By oy} ¢ (C,H) R39 ¢ 8 8 B | CS | © |Mine facilities at the (C.H.-(c)) (Mine) outlet of Qda. Run-off through culvert Rao. Cc € c c Rat B 8 B B (C.H.) (Schoo!) (B.W.-(c)) Raz 5 (B) c B | © | C [Large scale spot bank (C.H.) Jat Qda Outlot. Run-off through culvert Rag cy 5 c 8 c (ditto = 4{C.H.) 7 Raa € B B B | C | ©” [Railway crosses on (R.W.-(c)) | (Substation) Jembankment with lculvert_channe! Ras x B c A, of] ¢ (M.W.). Ras c B € c¢yctT<¢ (C.H.) (R.W.) Ray c c ¢ cj ets Rae c 8 c B | Cc | C” [Railway crosses on (R.W.-(c)) Jembankment with lculvert_ channel