Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Puppets in Pop Culture
Puppets in Pop Culture
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": "Angel" and the Puppet Paradox
Author(s): Cynthea Masson
Source: Studies in Popular Culture, Vol. 35, No. 2 (SPRING 2013), pp. 43-67
Published by: Popular Culture Association in the South
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23416335
Accessed: 14-03-2018 16:34 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Popular Culture Association in the South is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve
and extend access to Studies in Popular Culture
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
"The search for the essence of puppet theatre is an endless series of paradoxes."
—Margaret Williams ("Aspects of Puppet Theatre" 75)
43
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
45
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
of AngeL both the works of Joss Whedon and the texts of puppet theorists
engage with philosophical quandaries on free will and determinism. Re
garding puppets, Margaret Williams explains, "Since the puppet's apparent
autonomy suggests free will, while its manipulation evokes determinism,
the issue of 'who controls whom' is one of the many recurrent paradoxes
in puppet theory" ("Including" 122). This paradox likewise pervades the
Whedonverses from the designation of a "Chosen One" (as the protagonist
is called in Buffy the Vampire Slayer) onward: is Buffy free to choose, or
is her path predetermined? Numerous Whedon scholars have engaged at
length with the topics of choice and/or destiny and/or determinism, in
cluding (but certainly not limited to) K. Dale Koontz in Faith and Choice
in the Works of Joss Whedon and J. Michael Richardson and J. Douglas
Rabb in The Existential Joss Whedon.8 More recently, in a chapter on An
gel in The Philosophy of Joss Whedon, Susanne Ε. Foster and James B.
South illustrate that "[t]he possibility of genuine human choice—one not
controlled by forces outside the agent—is called into question repeatedly"
(176). Throughout the Whedonverses, this repeated emphasis on choice is
also repeatedly linked to puppetry.
Regarding the third area of puppet theory relevant to an analysis
of Angel, both Team Whedon and certain puppet theorists engage with
the concepts of "demon" and "soul." Notably, Williams explains that the
"pervasive metaphor in puppetry" of a manipulator "pulling the figure's
strings" can be "interpreted as determinism or even inner demons" ("In
cluding" 121). Theoretically, the so-called "inner demon" works as a pup
peteer seeking to control its puppet while, simultaneously, the puppet at
tempts to exercise control over its inner demon or puppeteer. Accordingly,
the "puppet as 'living object'" has also been interpreted by some puppet
theorists, such as Poh Sim Plowright, to represent a "body-soul dualism"
(Williams, "Including" 122). Williams, citing Plowright, explains, "The
'something' that seems to exist within a puppet, even to control its manip
ulator, takes on the quasi-theological terminology of'soul'" ("Including"
122).9 Thus, in puppet theory, the puppeteer is alternately viewed as de
mon and soul. So too do Angel's demon and soul vie for status of figura
tive puppeteer.
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
47
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
49
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
51
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
that. . . sans shoes thingamabob" in the source books. "You know," says
Spike, "the prophecy that says that Angel gets to be a real boy again." It
is during this conversation that Spike suggests that he, not Angel, could
be the vampire with a soul destined to become human. The repeated "real
boy" allusion works to suggest that Spike, like Angel, is also a figurative
puppet. Though, in comparison with Angel, Spike appears to have little
conflict with his inner demon, he is certainly controlled by an external ma
nipulator in that he is both brought to Wolfram & Hart in the first place and
then recorporealized at the manipulator's whim. In Season Five, figurative
puppets are plentiful.
Overall, however, the "real boy" references may have more to
do with Angel than Spike. The renewed interest in the Shanshu Prophecy
prompts Angel, despite his protestations to Wesley that "prophecies are
nonsense," to read the text for himself; thus we see him at the end of "The
Cautionary Tale" utter a request to a source book: "Shanshu Prophecy.
English translation." A few episodes later, during one of his hallucinatory
dreams in "Soul Purpose" (5.10), Angel watches a celebration for Spike
who, as Wesley recounts in the dream, has "save[d] the universe from
eternal bloodshed, horror and misery" and, therefore, as Fred explains,
"[d]eserves to become a real boy!" The Blue Fairy (as she is named in
the episode's credits)—a major character from Pinocchio—arrives on the
scene, sprinkles some fairy dust, and Spike hears his beating heart for
the first time in over a century.17 "You're human, Spike! You're alive!"
exclaims Fred. Angel watches the scene from the sidelines, his clothing
morphing into that of a shy, geeky Wolfram & Hart mail boy. Though only
in a dream, the Pinocchio allusions bring puppetry to the thematic fore
front with merely a few episodes to go before Angel's literal puppet trans
formation in "Smile Time." Angel is clearly preoccupied with the Shanshu
Prophecy and, at least as his subconscious suggests, with the possibility
of becoming human. This preoccupation would include the alternate pos
sibility of forever remaining a figurative puppet. Given that Angel will
"shanshu" only "once he fulfills his destiny," the freedom Angel may po
tentially gain when he becomes human is inherently linked to determinism
(to whoever or whatever determines the destiny Angel must first fulfill)
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
and thus to his status as figurative puppet. To revoke his puppet status in
relation to the Prophecy, Angel must revoke the possibility of becoming a
real boy.18
All the puppets in "Smile Time," including Angel, can be said to
be both puppets and puppeteers. Though the actual puppets are controlled
by a staff of puppeteers (including, from the Jim Henson Company, Alice
Dinnean-Vernon, Drew Massey, Julianne Buescher, and Victor Yerrid),
within the fiction of the episode, the puppets (including Angel) have con
trol of their own puppet bodies.19 That is, like Pinocchio, they are physi
cally puppets, but they move, think, and speak of their own accord without
external manipulators; by virtue of their puppet nature, they are their own
puppeteers. The episode titled "Smile Time" features within it a children's
television show titled Smile Time. The characters of this children's show
are also puppeteers of their human puppets—both of the fictional viewers
controlled through a "hidden carrier wave" and of the fictional production
staff within their studio. This reversal—puppets puppeteering humans—
is emphasized in the scene featuring Polo (the lead puppet demon) and
Gregor Framkin (the creator of Smile Time). In response to the human
Framkin's plea for death as a means to escape his puppet status, Polo asks
threateningly, "Are you saying you want to talk to the hand?" The close
up of Polo's hand as it thrusts into the gaping puppet hole in Framkin's
back graphically illustrates the potentially abusive relationship between
puppeteer and puppet—one replicated by various figurative puppeteers
throughout the Whedonverses.20
However, the relationship between puppet and puppeteer can be
one of productive unity rather than abuse. "My puppet and I are one,"
claims puppeteer Sirppa Sivori-Asp (3). Within puppet theory, this unity
between the puppet and the puppeteer is repeatedly connected to the
soul—a connection critical to my analysis of the Angel Puppet. In the two
episodes immediately preceding "Smile Time," the status of Angel's soul
is brought into question through two searing accusations. First, in "You're
Welcome" (5.12), Lindsey taunts, "I came to fight the vampire with a soul.
Guess you shouldn't have sold it, huh? Look at you, from champion to pa
thetic corporate puppet in just a few months." Second, in "Why We Fight"
53
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
(5.13), the former World War II sailor Lawson (the only man Angel sired
as a vampire after being ensouled) claims, "You gave me just enough,
didn't you? Enough of your soul to keep me trapped between who I was
and who I should be. I'm nothing because of you." Lawson, whom Angel
used to fight Nazis, insists, "You don't win a war by doing whatever it
takes. You win by doing what's right." To take a stand against corporate
puppetry, to wage war against the figurative puppeteers of his world, Angel
must recognize that he did not sell his soul, indeed that his soul is powerful
enough to guide both himself and his Team to do "what's right." Though
"Smile Time" may not appear at first glance to emphasize Angel's soul,
when viewed from the lens of puppet theory, it does. Sivori-Asp claims,
"I have a visible soul, my puppet" (2). Williams, in discussing Sivori-Asp,
explains that "the 'soul' of the artist is expressed through the medium of
the puppet" ("Aspects" 70). Similarly, in the film Being Elmo, puppeteer
Frank Oz (an associate of Tom Whedon) says, "When a puppet is true
and good and meaningful, it's the soul of a puppeteer you're seeing." Of
course, these people are speaking figuratively of literal puppets and literal
puppeteers. However, similar connections are addressed by various puppet
theorists, including Kenneth Gross who claims, "The story of puppets be
comes the story of embodied souls and ensouled objects" (Puppet 118-19).
If the puppet is inherently an ensouled object and Angel is an
ensouled vampire, then Angel Puppet is, once again (and so to speak),
an ensouled vampire squared. That is, the prominence of Angel's soul is
emphasized through his embodiment as Angel Puppet. Indeed, the very
presence of a soul is the distinguishing factor between Angel Puppet and
the other "Smile Time" puppets, as confirmed in one frame of Spike: Shad
ow Puppets: "Soulless demons. Bloodthirsty murderers. Wee little puppet
men." Despite the limitation of having "the proportionate excitability of a
puppet [his] size," Angel's soul is not only intact but emphatically intact.
Additionally, by virtue of Angel's literal puppet body, the once merely
figurative notion of his soul as puppeteer is now literal. Based on the re
lationship, as described in puppet theory, among puppeteer, puppet, and
soul, a notable syllogism emerges: if Angel is both puppet and puppeteer
within and of his physical manifestation as a puppet, and if, moreover,
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
the puppet represents the soul of the puppeteer, then Angel Puppet is an
embodiment of Angel's soul. In his human body Angel has a soul, but in
his puppet body Angel signifies the soul. This signification is crucial as an
emphatic gesture prior to Angel's decision to do "what's right"—to choose
his destiny by revoking the Shanshu Prophecy and "killing every single
member of the Black Thorn," the demonic secret society that plans to con
trol the world ("Not Fade Away"). As Sharon Sutherland and Sarah Swan
argue, the soul provides "an understanding of morality that is superior to .
. . prophetic writings" (142).
Puppet theorists who engage in discussions of the soul in relation
to puppets inevitably consider Heinrich von Kleist's "On the Marionette
Theater."21 This early nineteenth-century philosophical treatise compares
human dancers to puppets, granting superiority to the puppets. Here, 1 offer
a sampling of critical responses to Kleist's work as a means of illustrating
additional connections made by puppet theorists between the puppet and
the soul. Victoria Nelson names Kleist as one of the authors who, through
the use of the puppet trope, "revived the ancient paradox of spiritualized
matter by identifying human simulacra . . . with the soul" (ix).22 Margret
Schaefer contends that Kleist "is arguing essentially that humanity is lia
ble to states of mind-body disunity, states in which the 'soul' and the body
are not a harmonious whole, but a collection of parts warring against one
another" (369-70). She asserts that Kleist "conceptualized the puppeteer
as mystically within the puppet: puppet and puppeteer are one," at which
point "the self sees itself, not the other, as the source of the power and
greatness it feels through merger with the other" (377). The "parts warring
against one another" in Angel are not simply body and soul but demon and
soul; therefore, the "source of power" resulting from a "merger with the
other" can be understood in Angel Puppet as an empowered union of de
mon and soul working together against the threat of an external manipula
tor. Thus, in the final puppet fight of "Smile Time," when Polo says to An
gel, "I'm gonna tear you a new puppet hole, bitch" and, shortly thereafter,
in reaction to Angel Puppet's strength asks, "So, you got a little demon in
you?," Angel, morphing into Vampire Puppet, says, "I got a lot of demon
in me." In the close-up of Vampire Angel Puppet, when viewed through
55
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
in his arms and yells, "Doctor! Is there a Geppetto in the house?" Simi
larly, in "A Hole in the World," Lome embraces the fallen Fred, as Wesley
yells, "Get medical! Someone get medical now!" Second, Angel Puppet
insists, "1 do not have puppet cancer," while Fred, barely able to stand as
lllyria takes over her body, insists, "I'm not going to be cut down by some
monster flu. 1 am better than that." Of course, Angel is cured of his "pup
pet cancer" whereas Fred succumbs, against her will, to the "monster flu."
Illyria's puppet is the "shell" of Fred—initially exhibiting what Bronwen
Calvert refers to as "puppetlike movements" ("Shells" 5.16; 203).23 The
irony here is that metamorphosis to literal puppet is far less threatening
than metamorphosis into a figurative puppet. Whereas Angel's metamor
phosis emphasizes a productive unity between puppet and puppeteer and
the importance of the soul in maintaining a unified balance, Fred's meta
morphosis to a figurative puppet emphasizes an opposite extreme: that of
the puppeteer taking absolute control of the body, a process that necessi
tates destroying the soul, in this case through "the fires of resurrection"
("Shells").24 In the Angelverse, and by extension in the Whedonverses,
metaphorically speaking, in order not to lose your soul you must be your
own puppet master.
By "Not Fade Away," the final episode of Angel, Spike and Angel
exchange one last puppet reference. Spike asks, "What do you think all
this means for that Shanshu bugaboo? We make it through this, does one
of us get to be a real boy?" Angel responds, "Are you kidding? We're not
gonna make it through." "Well," says Spike, "long as it's not you." In
other words, by the end of the television series, becoming a "real boy" is
no longer at issue other than as a joke between battle comrades. With this
final "real boy" reference, we recognize that Angel has taken an alternate
path to that of Pinocchio—as in many a Whedon show, a traditional story
is turned on its head. "How ridiculous I was when I was a puppet!" de
clares Pinocchio at the end of Collodi's story. "And how happy I am to
have become a real boy!" (Collodi 262). Pinocchio's happiness may be
short lived if, as argued by both Harold Segel and Nicolas Perella, his "real
boy" status entails simultaneous transformation into a figurative puppet.
57
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
59
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
Notes
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
61
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
Works Cited
63
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
"Hey Kids, It's Smile Time!" Angel. Season 5. Disc 1. Featurette. Twentieth
Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2009. DVD.
"A Hole in the World." Angel. Season 5. Episode 15. Writ, and
dir. Joss Whedon. 2004. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment,
2009. DVD.
"Inside Out." Angel. Season 4. Episode 17. Writ, and dir. Steven S. DeKni
2003. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2009. DVD.
Jowett, Lorna. "Biting Humor: Harmony, Parody, and the Female Vampir
The Literary Angel: Essays on Influences and Traditions Reflected
in the Joss Whedon Series. Ed. AmiJo Comeford and Tamy Burnet
Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2010. 17-29. Print.
"Judgement." Angel. Season 2. Episode 1. Writ. David Greenwalt and Jo
Whedon. Dir. Michael Lange. 2000. Twentieth Century Fox Home
Entertainment, 2009. DVD.
"Just Rewards." Angel. Season 5. Episode 2. Writ. David Fury and Ben E
Dir. James A. Contner. 2003. Twentieth Century Fox Home
Entertainment, 2009. DVD.
Kerns, Dan. "Angel By the Numbers." Five Seasons of Angel: Science Fic
and Fantasy Writers Discuss Their Favorite Vampire. Ed. Glenn
Yeffeth. Dallas: Benbella, 2004: 23-31. Print.
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
"Not Fade Away." Angel. Season 5. Episode 22. Writ. Jeffrey Bell and Joss
Whedon. Dir. Jeffrey Bell. 2004. Twentieth Century Fox Home
Entertainment, 2006. DVD.
"Once More, with Feeling." Bufjy the Vampire Slayer. Season 6. Episode 7.
Writ, and dir. Joss Whedon. 2001. Twentieth Century
Fox Home Entertainment, 2009. DVD.
"Orpheus." Angel. Season 4. Episode 15. Writ. Mere Smith. Dir. Terrence
O'Hara. 2003. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2009.
DVD.
Partney, Matthew. "The Puppet Summit." Angel: The Official 2004 Angel
Yearbook. Titan Magazines, 2004: 60-66. Print.
Pateman, Matthew. The Aesthetics of Culture in Bufify the Vampire Slayer.
Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2006. Print.
"Peace Out." Angel. Season 4. Episode 21. Writ. David Fury. Dir. Jefferson
Kibbee. 2003. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2009.
DVD.
65
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cynthea Masson
"Redefinition." Angel. Season 2. Episode 11. Writ. Mere Smith. Dir. Michael
Grossman. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2006. DVD.
Richardson, J. Michael, and J. Douglas Rabb. The Existential Joss Whedon:
Evil and Human Freedom in Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel,
Firefly and Serenity. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2007. Print.
Rilke, Rainer Maria. Duino Elegies and The Sonnets to Orpheus. Ed. and trans.
Stephen Mitchell. New York: Vintage International, 2009. Print.
Schaefer, Margret. "Kleist's 'About the Puppet Theater' and the Narcissism
of the Artist." American Imago 32.4 (1975): 366-88. Print.
Segel, Harold B. Pinocchio's Progeny: Puppets. Marionettes, Automatons, and
Robots in Modernist and Avant-Garde Drama. Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins UP, 1995. Print.
Sivori-Asp, Sirppa. "The Presence of the Gods." The Language of the Puppet.
Ed. Laurence R. Kominz and Mark Levenson. Vancouver, WA:
Pacific Puppetry Center Press, 1990. 2-4. Print.
Sharp, Corona. "Pirandello's Use of Puppetry as Metaphor and Technique."
English Studies in Canada 14.1 (1988): 26-38. Print.
"Shells." Angel. Season 5. Episode 16. Writ, and dir. Stephen S. DeKnight.
2004. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2009. DVD.
Shershow, Scott Cutler. Puppets and "Popular" Culture. Ithaca and London:
Cornell UP, 1995. Print.
"Smile Time." Angel. Season 5. Episode 14. Writ, and dir. Ben Edlund. 2004.
Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2009. DVD.
"Soul Purpose." Angel. Season 5. Episode 10. Writ. Brent Fletcher. Dir.
David Boreanaz. 2004. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment,
2009. DVD.
Spike: Shadow Puppets. Writ. Brian Lynch. Illus. Franco Urru. In Spike
Omnibus. San Diego, CA: IDW, 2010. Chapters 1-4. Print.
Stuller, Jennifer K. "The Ink-Stained Amazon Presents: A Brief History of
the Best, Worst, Known, and Not-So-Known. Pop-Culture Influenc
on the Whedonverse Buffy verse. Mostly." Originally presented
at SCW4: Slayage Conference on the Whedonverses, Flagler College
Florida, June 2010. Web. 14 May 2012.
<www.ink-stainedamazon.com/pdf/JKStuller_Slayage2010_lite.pdf
Sutherland, Sharon, and Sarah Swan. "The Rule of Prophecy: Source of La
in the City of Angel." Reading Angel: The TV Spin-Off with a
Soul. Ed. Stacey Abbot. New York: I.B. Tauris, 2005. 132-45. Print.
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
"Break Out the Champagne, Pinocchio": Angel and the Puppet Paradox
"The Thin Dead Line." Angel. Season 2. Episode 14. Writ. Shawn Ryan and
Jim Kouf. Dir. Scott McGinnis. 2001. Twentieth Century Fox Home
Entertainment, 2009. DVD.
"Through the Looking Glass." Angel. Season 2. Episode 21. Writ, and dir. Tim
Minear. 2001. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment,
2009. DVD.
"To Shanshu in L. A." Angel. Season 1. Episode 22. Writ, and dir. David
Greenwalt. 2000. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2006.
DVD.
"Who Are you?" Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Season 4. Episode 16. Dir. And
Writ. Joss Whedon. 2000. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment,
2009. DVD.
67
This content downloaded from 205.208.116.24 on Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:34:48 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms