Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kaytlin Furlong
EDI 685
Winter 2018
Mindfulness as a Means of Reducing Disruptive Behavior
classroom behaviors (Harpin, Kim, Rossi, & Swanson, 2016). Many studies have
been conducted on the use of mindfulness and the positive impact that it has on
students. Upon assessing four categories of classroom behavior, Black and Fernando
participate in class activities, and show respect toward classroom peers, increased
with less disruptive behavior (Pas, Bradshaw, Hershfeldt, & Leaf, 2010). This is all
largely due to the fact that the human brain is most successful when given
downtime and provided with off-task energizers. John and Danielle Almarode
(2008) found that students are less likely to become disengaged and disruptive
when given the chance to relax their brains throughout the school day.
These findings were the inspiration behind this action research project.
conducted whole-class, the results provided are based upon only five students.
These five students were chosen due to their disruptive tendencies. These particular
students have trouble focusing in class; thus, they often talk out of turn, get out of
their seats without permission, and fidget with things at their desks. Additionally,
two of these students are currently being tested for Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder (ADHD). Ratey and Hagerman (2008) found that many students with
Furlong 2
Mindfulness as a Means of Reducing Disruptive Behavior
ADHD or other behavioral disorders are more able to focus and remain engaged
breathing, stretching, and cross-body movements that involve using both sides of
the brain at the same time. All of these activities have proven to positively influence
the brain by increasing blood flow and oxygen levels as well as production of
“happy” hormones such as dopamine (Almarode & Almarode, 2008). Over the
course of ten days, these activities were done twice throughout the day: after the
morning math warm-up, to prepare students for new daily content, and after the
afternoon recess, to prepare students for the remainder of the day. In order to
create a control group, to compare results with, an activity was not done after lunch
The five students were scored on a scale of one to three, with one being low
and three being high. The scores were based upon five categories, three of which
were considered “disruptive behaviors” and two that were “productive behaviors”.
The three disruptive behaviors included talking out of turn, fidgeting with things at
desk, and getting out of seat without permission. The two productive behaviors
included class participation and staying on task. Graphs showing the data for this
research can be found on pages 6-7 of this document. The scores reported are an
The blue line, labeled “Mindfulness”, shows average scores for the students,
for a 20-minute time frame, after the two sessions in which an activity was
conducted (morning and late afternoon). The red line, labeled “No Activity”, shows
Furlong 3
Mindfulness as a Means of Reducing Disruptive Behavior
average scores for the students, for a 20-minute time frame, after the session in
which an activity was not conducted (after lunch recess). As noted above the graphs
on pages 6-7 of this document, low scores were desired for “Disruptive Behaviors”
Conversely, high scores were desired for “Productive Behaviors” because this
The results of this short study are in agreement with the studies summarized
at the beginning of this paper. Upon looking at the data, one can see that the
shows that positive results increased over time. What this means, is that after these
activities became more routine in the students’ daily lives, they began to respond
more positively to them. During the first three days, scores were very similar for
“Mindfulness” and “No Activity”. This is likely because students respond most
during these two parts of the day, was brand new to them. Over time though, they
became more comfortable with this new routine and showed positive responses
toward it. The disruptive behaviors showed more consistent results than the
As with every study, there were various limitations to this project. The first is
that it was only conducted over a ten-day time period, which didn’t allow for a
significant amount of time for the students to consider it part of the daily routine.
Furlong 4
Mindfulness as a Means of Reducing Disruptive Behavior
The second is that the scores were decided upon by only one person, myself, which
undoubtedly creates some inaccuracies in the results. The third is that only five
students were studied for data collection, and during a couple of the days, two or
three of these students were not fully engaged in participation during the
mindfulness activities.
Due to previous research and the results of this action research project, I
if begun on the first day, as a part of the daily routine, students will greatly benefit
from these activities. The third-grade classroom in which this project was conducted
had not previously used mindfulness. In order to make the implementation more
effective, I will institute mindfulness from day one and remain consistent with these
activities every day, for the entirety of the school year. I intend on including other
Additionally, these practices will be done more often throughout the day in order to
Furlong 5
Mindfulness as a Means of Reducing Disruptive Behavior
NOTE: For disruptive behaviors, low (1) is good, while high (3) is bad.
Disruptive Behaviors
3
2.5
AVERAGE SCORES
1.5
Mindfulness
1 No Activity
0.5
0
One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten
DAYS
Disruptive Behaviors
Ten
Nine
Eight
Seven
DAYS
Six
Five No Activity
Four Mindfulness
Three
Two
One
Furlong 6
Mindfulness as a Means of Reducing Disruptive Behavior
NOTE: For productive behaviors, low (1) is bad, while high (3) is good.
Productive Behaviors
2.5
2
AVERAGE SCORES
1.5
Mindfulness
1
No Activity
0.5
0
One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten
DAYS
Productive Behaviors
Ten
Nine
Eight
Seven
Six
DAYS
Five No Activity
Four Mindfulness
Three
Two
One
Furlong 7
Mindfulness as a Means of Reducing Disruptive Behavior
References
Almarode, J., and Almarode, D. (2008). Energizing students: Maximizing student attention
and engagement in the science classroom. The science teacher, 75(9), 32-25.
Retrieved from
http://ezproxy.gvsu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=
true&db=ehh&AN=35725677&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Black, D., and Fernando, R. (2014). Mindfulness training and classroom behavior among
lower-income and ethnic minority elementary school children. Journal of child &
family studies, 23(7), 1242-1246. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-013-9784-4
Harpin, S., Rossi, A., Kim A., & Swanson, L. (2016). Behavioral impacts of a mindfulness pilot
intervention for elementary school students. Education, 137(2), 149-156. Retrieved
from
http://ezproxy.gvsu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=
true&db=ehh&AN=120179274&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Pas, E. T., Bradshaw, C. P., Hershfeldt, P. A., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). A multilevel exploration of
the influence of teacher efficacy and burnout on response to student problem
behavior and school-based service use. School psychology quarterly, 25(1), 13-27.
Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.gvsu.edu/docview/614515484?accountid=394
73
Ratey, J., and E. Hagerman. 2008. SPARK: The revolutionary new science of exercise and the
brain. New York: Little, Brown
Furlong 8