Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • No Unit or Description

    Uploaded by

    ema
    13 views2 pages
    1. The document lists figures reported in an energy management tool for three companies - Knauf, Makstil, and REK Bitola - and identifies figures that need confirmation or clarification when compared to other reports. For Knauf, the reported oil and LPG savings in the tool do not match the annual consumption and savings calculated in the final report. 2. For Makstil, the reported annual energy cost savings and non-energy benefits in the tool need confirmation. 3. For REK Bitola, the reported estimated energy management system implementation costs in the tool differ from costs reported in conversations and the final report during an energy management program with UNIDO.

    Original Description:

    this is trial

    Original Title

    Knauf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1. The document lists figures reported in an energy management tool for three companies - Knauf, Makstil, and REK Bitola - and identifies figures that need confirmation or clarification when compared to other reports. For Knauf, the reported oil and LPG savings in the tool do not match the annual consumption and savings calculated in the final report. 2. For Makstil, the reported annual energy cost savings and non-energy benefits in the tool need confirmation. 3. For REK Bitola, the reported estimated energy management system implementation costs in the tool differ from costs reported in conversations and the final report during an energy management program with UNIDO.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    13 views2 pages

    No Unit or Description

    Uploaded by

    ema
    1. The document lists figures reported in an energy management tool for three companies - Knauf, Makstil, and REK Bitola - and identifies figures that need confirmation or clarification when compared to other reports. For Knauf, the reported oil and LPG savings in the tool do not match the annual consumption and savings calculated in the final report. 2. For Makstil, the reported annual energy cost savings and non-energy benefits in the tool need confirmation. 3. For REK Bitola, the reported estimated energy management system implementation costs in the tool differ from costs reported in conversations and the final report during an energy management program with UNIDO.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    1.

    Knauf
    Почитуван Г-н...

    Confirmation would be needed on


     Oil and LPG savings reported in the Tool for reporting results look incoherent when compared with the
    respective annual consumption and savings calculated through the regression analysis as indicated in
    the final report.
    Annual Savings according to Tool Savings according to
    consumption regression analysis
    (Final report)
    2015 2015 2016 Jan – Aug 2016
    Fuel 2,300,000 kg 2,359,414 2,723,357 12,455 kg
    oil liters liters
    LPG 2,200,000 kg 2,357,378 kg 2,485,130 kg 34,018 kg

     Other figures to be confirmed/clarified


    Source: Tool
    2015 2016
    Annual energy cost savings / 2017 mkd
    Non-energy benefits (No unit or
    65000
    description)
    Non-energy cost savings 2,873,280 mkd

    2. Makstil

    Figures to be confirmed/clarified:
    Source: Final Report
    (During UNIDO EnMS programme)
    Equipment and other capital expenditures for
    EUR 2,748,000
    EnMS implementation
    Actual energy savings and energy cost savings
    /
    achieved

    3. REK Bitola

    Figures to be confirmed/clarified:
    According to Tool According to final
    report/conversations
    2015 2016 (During UNIDO EnMS
    programme)
    Estimated EnMS / EUR 270,000 EUR 0 – 4,000
    Implementation (without
    Costs investment)

    One last question: is that the latest version of the Tool?

    Thank you very much and I am available for any comment/request.

    Best regards,
    Giorgia

    You might also like