Professional Documents
Culture Documents
04/03/2017
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to look at the effects of influenza and hepatitis B vaccinations
on healthcare workers and their patients. Factors such as influenza and hepatitis B backgrounds,
their coinciding vaccination rates, potential patient and healthcare worker benefits, and
healthcare worker vaccination compliance rates were explored. This research was drawn from
ten references ranging from qualitative studies, textbooks, and literature reviews. It was found
that vaccinations can help reduce transmission rates between healthcare workers and their
patients in theory, but despite the strong recommendations for immunizations not all employers
influenza and hepatitis B vaccinations resulting in a higher risk of infection transmission. There
was no definite evidence directly relating rates of vaccinations to transmission rates in the studies
analyzed. There were other benefits shown such as reduced sick days for vaccinated healthcare
workers when compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. Overall, the research showed that
despite the potential beneficial effects of influenza and hepatitis B vaccinations, not all
healthcare workers are immunized and there is risk for potential infections to occur that could be
prevented by vaccinations.
EFFECTS OF INFLUENZA AND HEPATITIS VACCINATIONS 3
Effects of Influenza, Hepatitis B, and Pertussis Vaccinations on Patients and Healthcare Workers
Each year, a portion of the human population acquires preventable diseases caused by
various infectious agents such as viruses or bacteria. Depending on the type of infectious agent,
these diseases can be spread from person to person through various modes of transmission. Such
modes can include direct contact with an infected individual or contaminated source, indirect
contact such as through coughing and sneezing, and some diseases can even be airborne for days
(Hinkle, Cheever, 2013). There are multiple ways to prevent the spread of diseases in the
healthcare setting, which include hand hygiene, the use of personal protective equipment, and
vaccinations. Vaccinations are used to produce immunity in the body (Hinkle, Cheever, 2013).
Healthcare professionals, such as a registered nurse (RN), practice proper hand hygiene and
personal protective equipment usage in all healthcare settings, but vaccines to preventable
diseases are not universally standard. Some studies performed on the vaccination rates of certain
preventable diseases such as influenza and hepatitis B in healthcare settings show potential
beneficial effects on both the patient and healthcare workers. Vaccinations can reduce
transmission rates to and from patients and can also reduce the amount of sick days health care
workers take. Despite these potential beneficial effects, research is conflicting on the extent of
benefits and some healthcare employers do not mandate certain vaccinations while a portion of
healthcare workers abstain from obtaining immunizations altogether. Therefore, the following
research question was addressed: How do the rates of vaccinations of influenza and hepatitis B
Literature Review
Information was acquired via Ohio LINK databases, specifically CINHAL Plus and
MEDLINE. Ten sources were reviewed and analyzed in order to compare and contrast the
effects of vaccinations of influenza and hepatitis B on healthcare workers and their patients.
Backgrounds for influenza and hepatitis B will be discussed along with studies that analyzed
their coinciding vaccination rates, patient benefits, and healthcare worker vaccination
compliance rates along with other miscellaneous factors specific to each disease.
Influenza
Influenza is a viral infection that affects the respiratory system and could lead to other
complications such as pneumonia. “Each year, the influenza virus is responsible for a significant
number of hospitalizations and deaths, especially among the elderly” (Rosati et al., 2016, p.178).
The elderly populations are at an increased risk for contracting influenza due to the decreasing
efficiency of their body systems such as their respiratory and immune systems. It is important
for this demographic and others at increased risk to receive the yearly influenza vaccine in order
to prevent acute symptoms. These influenza vaccines are designed annually to defend against the
Since healthcare settings are made up of a vast populace of employees, these staff
members serve as vehicles for modes of transmission. Nurses are at the front line of preventative
care in many healthcare settings and they typically spend the majority of their days taking care of
patients. If a staff member becomes ill, they could potentially spread the illness before they
show manifestations of the virus or bacterial infection. Vaccinations not only protect the patients
from unnecessary complications, but they also protect the nurses from acquiring the illness as
well. This is a key concept for the use of preventative vaccinations and why mandating or not
EFFECTS OF INFLUENZA AND HEPATITIS VACCINATIONS 5
mandating vaccinations is a nursing issue. This can lead to an epidemic within the hospital or
health care community, depending on what virus or bacteria is spread and if the patients or staff
Unvaccinated nurses may need time off from work to recover from the illness. This could
leave the hospital short staffed for a period of time depending on the depth of the hospital staff.
“Health care workers in hospitals had the highest uptake (89.6%) of the influenza vaccine
whereas those working in LTC facilities and Home Health Agencies (HHAs) had the lowest
coverage (61%)” (Rosati et al., 2016, p.178). The statistics from this study showed that neither
facility had a 100% compliance rate. It is important to understand why some employees do not
want to receive the recommended vaccinations. Some reasons listed in the study were beliefs of
not being in a high risk group, current health status, not liking injections, and lack of education
(Rosati et al., 2016). In order to increase compliance, employers could pass out pamphlets on the
composition of the vaccine, administration method, and the risks of complications from the
Hospitals also have the option of making certain immunizations mandatory, which would cause
their rates to increase but could also influence workers to seek employment elsewhere.
The participants in the multiple research studies to be discussed were of different health
care facilities. The first study “The Benefits and Challenges of the Influenza Vaccination Among
Home Health Care Workers” focused on a Home Health Care agency in New Jersey (NJ). The
particular agency was chosen because nurses provided direct care to the patients. At the start of
the Influenza season all staff were offered free vaccinations at various locations in NJ. When the
employees were to receive the yearly vaccination it was recorded by the facilities infection
control department whether or not they had received the immunization (Rosati et al., 2016).
EFFECTS OF INFLUENZA AND HEPATITIS VACCINATIONS 6
Employees that did not have proper documentation of the flu shot were contacted monthly to
update their current status. Approaching the end of the flu season, the agency sent out a survey to
all employees who did not receive the immunization or did not have proper documentation
proving they were in compliance. The survey was anonymous, asking questions concerning the
The second study “Examining the role of a decision aid in reducing decisional conflict
amongst hospital healthcare workers towards receiving the influenza vaccine” focused on
participants in two hospital settings. The study was voluntary and posted signs as well as notified
supervisors on units to spread the information by word of mouth. Once the researchers acquired
enough volunteers of various hospital staff 41 to be exact they had the participants sign waivers.
The participants were offered a reward for participating in the study (Seale et al., 2016).
In the first study the results of the research showed an uptake of the influenza vaccine
over the three flu seasons covered. The rate of flu vaccines amongst employees improved from
38% to 74% and then the following year increased to 88% (Rosati et al., 2016). This indicated
that the efforts made to increase staff influenza vaccination rates were successful. Forty Three
percent of the staff members that chose not to receive the flu shot responded to the survey. Out
of the 43%, 59% reported seeing patients daily and typically work full time. (Rosati et al., 2016).
The survey of employees that did not receive the flu vaccine concluded the following
data, when asked on a scale of strongly agree to strongly disagree 27.8% of staff members
believe that they are not in a high risk group. If compared to the other survey taken of the same
employees where they could only choose one option as the most likely reason for noncompliance
the results show, staff members feel the vaccine will make them sick. These are both
misconceptions of the staff members. Healthcare workers are at increased risk of contracting
EFFECTS OF INFLUENZA AND HEPATITIS VACCINATIONS 7
Influenza due to the amount of sick patients with the illness they are around. The number one
reason the home health care workers refused the vaccination is also a misconception. The flu
shot will not infect the recipient with Influenza, people tend to have this view because some flu
like manifestation can come about after receiving the vaccination but they subside within days
In the second study the research was based on a decisional aid tool, this tool helped
workers in both hospitals in choosing to receive or not receive the flu vaccine. The decisional aid
out by asking them a series of questions relating to reasons why they wouldn't or would want to
be immunized (Seale, et al., 2016). After moving on in the aid, they are given general
information about the Influenza vaccine and are asked if they wish to receive the immunization.
The study used qualitative methods to collect data on reasons employees wished not to
vaccinated, some people in the study felt the Influenza vaccine was new to the public. Other
employees were surprised to find out they are at risk of contracting the flu as well as the adults
greater than forty five and children. (Seale et al., 2016). The study ultimately proved the
decisional aid as useful because it showed a decrease in workers that were unsure about
Hepatitis B Virus
The hepatitis B virus can be found in body fluids such as blood, saliva, semen and
vaginal secretions which can permeate through any break in the skin and infect an individual. It
is transmitted primarily through blood (percutaneous and per mucosal routes) (Hinkle, Cheever,
2013, p.1360). Healthcare workers who provide direct care to their patients use standard
precautions to prevent the potential transmission of this virus to themselves and to other patients.
EFFECTS OF INFLUENZA AND HEPATITIS VACCINATIONS 8
“The risk of acquired hepatitis B infection, after a single exposure to hepatitis B virus-infected
blood or body fluid, ranges from six percent to 30 percent with increased risk attributed to
repeated exposure”(Garcell et al., 2016). Proper hand hygiene along with personal protective
equipment use can reduce the rates of transmission of any communicable disease including HBV
but obtaining the HBV vaccination is also strongly recommended to reduce these rates (Hinkle,
taking into account the high risk of exposure they have to blood, secretions or body fluids or
for healthcare workers worldwide (Garcell et al., 2016).Despite the beneficial immunity effect
the HBV vaccination has, many healthcare employers do not mandate their workers to obtain it
upon employment. A study performed on the staff of a 75 bed community hospital based in
Dukhan, Qatar showed that HBV vaccination compliance of healthcare professionals varied
(Garcell et al., 2016). Of 705 HCWs studied, 595 (84.4%) workers received a full hepatitis B
vaccination schedule; 110 (15.6%) received a single dose out of whom, 85 (77.3%) had
incomplete vaccination schedule, while 25 (22.7%) received booster doses. The full schedule
was reported with significantly (p<0.001) higher frequency by nurses (90.2%) compared with
Abstaining from receiving the HBV vaccine for a healthcare worker may put one at risk for
infection despite proper personal protective equipment usage and hand hygiene. Accidents do
occur (needle sticks or other sharps injuries) and “Occupational exposures to hepatitis B virus
have historically accounted for as many as four and a half percent of the acute hepatitis B cases
EFFECTS OF INFLUENZA AND HEPATITIS VACCINATIONS 9
reported in the USA” (Garcell et al., 2016, p.235). Some reasoning’s surveyed healthcare
workers used for not obtaining vaccinations included the belief that one was not at risk for
infection, misinformation about the vaccine’s probability of instilling illness, and even the
avoidance of being stuck with a needle (Rosati et al., 2016). Other studies even question the
extent of benefits from employer mandated vaccination on patients themselves (De Serres et al.,
2017). Despite these potential reasons for not getting vaccinated, immunizations are strongly
Conclusion
Studies have shown that influenza and hepatitis B vaccination rates can affect the
transmission rates between healthcare workers and their patients. Healthcare workers benefit
hazards. They also minimize the possibility of transferring these infectious agents to their
patients. Despite the benefits, not all employers mandate influenza and hepatitis B vaccines upon
vaccinations may alert healthcare workers to possible dangers of not being vaccinated and
vaccinations, some studies claim that the effects of healthcare worker immunization on patient
care are exaggerated. There is little data directly correlating rates of infection with vaccination
rates in public healthcare settings. The data available concentrates mostly on rates of
vaccinations and does not factor in the effects on transmission rates of nosocomial infections
such influenza or hepatitis B inoculation. This may be because it is difficult to determine the
References
De Serres, G., Skowronski, D., Ward, B., Gardam, M., Lemieux, C., Yassi, A., Patrick, D.,
Krajden, M., Loeb, M., Collignon. P., Carat, F. (2017) Influenza vaccination of
healthcare workers: Critical analysis of the evidence for patient benefit underpinning
Evirgen, O., Savas, N., Motor, V. K., Onlen, Y., Yengil, E. (2014). An evaluation of knowledge,
Garcell, G., Arias, V., García, G., Serrano, A. (2016). Seroprotection against vaccine-preventable
diseases amongst health care workers in a community hospital, Qatar. Int J Occup
Hinkle, J. L., & Cheever, K. H. (2013). Brunner & Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical
Hinkle, J. L., & Cheever, K. H. (2013). Brunner & Suddarth's Textbook of Medical-Surgical
Joukar, F., Mansour-Ghanaei, F., Naghipour, M., & Asgharnezhad, M. (2016). Immune
not responding to the primary vaccine series: A randomized clinical trial. Hepatitis
EFFECTS OF INFLUENZA AND HEPATITIS VACCINATIONS 11
Lindley, M. C., Bridges, C. B., Strikas, R. A., Kalayil, E. J., Woods, L. O., Pollock, D.,
Sievert, D. (2014). Influenza vaccination performance measurement among acute care hospital-
based health care personnel -United States, 2013-14 influenza season. Morbidity and
Modak, R. M., Parris, S. M., Dilisi, J. P., Premkumar, A. (2012). Increasing influenza
Rosati, R. J., Zales, M., & Landers, S. (2016). The Benefits and challenges of the influenza
vaccination among home health care workers. Home Health Care Management &
Seale, H., Kaur, R., Lajoie, K., Dixon, J., & Gallard, J. (2016). Examining the role of a decision
aid in reducing decisional conflict amongst hospital healthcare workers towards receiving
1339-0