Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Out PDF
Out PDF
Audiology
Audiol Neurotol 2013;18:83–88 Received: May 23, 2012
Neurotology Accepted after revision: September 17, 2012
DOI: 10.1159/000343579
Published online: November 6, 2012
Right posterior Upbeat, counterclockwise torsional nystagmus Downbeat and clockwise torsional nystagmus
Right anterior Downbeat, counterclockwise torsional nystagmus Upbeat and clockwise torsional nystagmus
Left anterior Downbeat, clockwise torsional nystagmus Upbeat and counterclockwise torsional nystagmus
a specific ear-down position with a latency of several sec- comes of CRP among the largest to date prospective case
onds. Nystagmus typically lasts only for a limited time, series with 965 patients treated for BPPV over a period of
its direction reverses on resuming the upright position 16 years in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at
and shows fatigability with a progressive decline of inten- the University of Crete, School of Medicine, Greece.
sity upon repetition of the maneuvers [Dix and Hallpike,
1952]. Among the most widely accepted theories aiming
to explain this phenomenon is the canalithiasis theory, Patients and Methods
which states that otoconial debris are freely floating in This prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled study was
the endolymph of the semicircular canal [Parnes and Mc- based on a previously accepted protocol by the Institutional Re-
Clure, 1992], and the cupulolithiasis theory, in which the view Board for Human Subjects of the University Hospital of
particles are at least partly adhered to the cupula of the Crete. More specifically, 965 patients (481 men and 484 women,
ampullar end of the canal [Schuknecht, 1969]. For the last from 18 to 87 years of age) suffering from BPPV were enrolled in
the study, which was conducted between January 1995 and De-
few years, BPPV treatment has been based on particle- cember 2010. Inclusion criteria were a positive history and a pos-
repositioning maneuvers or canalith repositioning pro- itive provocative maneuver at the time of admission (either Dix-
cedures (CRPs) that aim at removing otoconial debris Hallpike or Roll test). The Dix-Hallpike maneuver was also used
from the semicircular canal and returning them to the for the determination of the involved semicircular canal (table 1).
vestibule [Soto-Varela et al., 2011]. If the patient’s history was suggestive of BPPV but the provoking
maneuver was negative, the subjects were asked to be re-evaluated
Several articles have been published on the utility and when an acute episode of vertigo reoccurred. Patients with un-
the efficacy of various CRPs for the treatment of BPPV. It stable heart disease, significant stenosis of carotid arteries, disor-
is widely accepted that the majority of these CRPs can ders of the spine, suspected central lesion, or Ménière’s attack
result in substantial benefit with extremely low risk for were excluded. A central lesion can be suspected either by the Dix-
harm [Kerber and Helmchen, 2012]. This fact, as well as Hallpike maneuver or the rest clinical examination. More spe-
cifically, neurological consultation and an MRI scan were re-
the existence of several BPPV forms, poses questions re- quested in cases of severe occipital headache, focal neurological
garding the real benefit of CRPs. Short- and long-term signs, vertical or torsional nystagmus or persistent nystagmus (no
outcomes have been published, and several predictors of fatigue) during the Dix-Hallpike maneuver. A variant of Epley’s
persistence or recurrence have been proposed [Lee and 5-position cycle maneuver was performed for posterior and ante-
Kim, 2010]. Moreover, several hypotheses regarding rior canal involvement, whereas a variant of the Barbeque maneu-
ver was used for diagnosing horizontal canal BPPV. An Oster
causes of otolith debris detachment exist. Hormones, cal- handheld vibrator at 80 Hz was used on the ipsilateral mastoid at
cium metabolism, aging, or trauma may have an effect on the second position of CRP in the first 110 cases of posterior or
the pathogenesis [Lee and Kim, 2010]. anterior canal involvement. For all the remaining patients, we
Direct histopathological and molecular studies are manually shook their head or tapped the cranium during CRP
difficult to perform either due to the self-limiting nature [Epley, 1992; Parnes and McClure, 1992]. Another difference from
the originally described maneuvers was that patients were left
of the disease or because BPPV resolves in the majority of in each position for approximately 3 min as they were rotated
patients with conservative treatment [Prokopakis et al., through the maneuver. Although it seems that 3 min is probably
2005]. Epidemiological data, especially in relation to re- long enough to wait, we decided not to modify our initial protocol
currence of BPPV, can provide indirect estimations of regarding this issue. In all cases, CRP was repeated until no fur-
pathogenic factors and assessment of prognostic indices. ther vertigo or nystagmus was provoked. After CRP, patients were
advised not to bend over, move their head up or down, or lie su-
Large prospective studies on short- and long-term out- pine for 2 days. Patients returned for re-evaluation 48 h and 7 days
comes of CRPs offer valuable information in this respect. after the maneuver. If the provocative maneuver was positive on
Herein we report one of the short- and long-term out- follow-up evaluation, the CRP was repeated (fig. 1). No premedi-
Results
Dix-Hallpike test
a total of 965 patients with BPPV. The posterior semicir- Follow-up Dix-Hallpike (other side)
cular canal was involved in 849 (88%) of them, whereas (–) (+)
the horizontal and anterior semicircular canals were in- Consider HSC
Epley maneuver (perform Roll test)
volved in 96 (10%) and 20 (2%) patients, respectively. At
the time of the initial examination, duration of symptoms
varied from a few hours to over a year. Thirteen percent Dix-Hallpike test
of patients experienced vertigo for over 3 years, with the
(+) (–)
majority of them reporting more than 3 episodes per year.
Symptoms subsided immediately in 819 patients (85%) af- Epley maneuver Dix-Hallpike in
48 h
ter the first CRP. In 88 patients, the CRP had to be per- (–)
formed twice and only 19 patients (2%) required CRP 3
Dix-Hallpike test Follow-up
times or more (table 2).
Regarding immediate adverse events of CRPs, 5.7% of
patients experienced severe nausea and vertigo during the Fig. 1. Flow chart of a patient presenting with BPPV. HSC = Hor-
procedure, postponing the therapeutic maneuvers. CRPs izontal semicircular canal.
were performed after the administration of antiemetic
therapy (mainly dimenhydrinate or metoclopramide).
Eighty-three percent of patients experienced instability or
‘light-headedness’ for approximately 48 h after CRP. A viduals reported no symptoms of vertigo when contacted
canalith jam was observed in 47 (5%) subjects during the by telephone and were considered cured. One hundred
CRP or the Dix-Hallpike maneuver after the CRP. thirty-nine (15.5%) patients reported recurrence of their
At the follow-up visit, 48 h after initial treatment, the symptoms. Older age and history of head trauma or ves-
provoking maneuver was positive in 135 patients (14%). tibular neuropathy (group B) increase the risk of recur-
Sixty-five of them were over 70 years of age, 22 had a his- rence significantly (p ! 0.001) (fig. 2). The estimated risk
tory of vestibular neuropathy, and 5 of them had experi- of symptom recurrence using a Kaplan-Meier analysis is
enced serious head trauma. CRP was repeated on all these 7 and 55% in groups A (younger patients without history
patients. During the third evaluation (i.e., a week after of head trauma or vestibular neuropathy who encoun-
initial treatment), the provoking maneuver was still pos- tered recurrence of symptoms) and B, respectively, by 16
itive in 77 (8% of total) patients. Thirty-six were over 70 years (fig. 2).
years of age, 7 and 2 had a history of vestibular neuropa-
thy and head trauma, respectively (table 3). CRP was per-
formed again on all these patients with a positive provok- Discussion
ing maneuver as during the first admission.
In our group of patients, the mean follow-up was 74 To our knowledge, this is the largest prospective BPPV
months. Seventy people were lost to follow-up or died series study that has been published in English to date. It
from other causes. Seven hundred fifty-six (84%) indi- clearly indicates the importance of older age and history
References
Bhattacharyya N, Baugh RF, Orvidas L, Barrs D, Gacek RR: Pathology of benign paroxysmal po- Lempert T, Tiel-Wilck K: A positional maneuver
Bronston LJ, Cass S, Chalian AA, Desmond sitional vertigo revisited. Ann Otol Rhinol for treatment of horizontal-canal benign
AL, Earll JM, Fife TD, Fuller DC, Judge JO, Laryngol 2003;112:574–582. positional vertigo. Laryngoscope 1996; 106:
Mann NR, Rosenfeld RM, Schuring LT, Gordon CR, Levite R, Joffe V, Gadoth N: Is post- 476–478.
Steiner RW, Whitney SL, Haidari J: Clinical traumatic benign paroxysmal positional ver- Nunez RA, Cass SP, Furman JM: Short- and
practice guideline: benign paroxysmal posi- tigo different from the idiopathic form? Arch long-term outcomes of canalith reposition-
tional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Neurol 2004;61:1590–1593. ing for benign paroxysmal positional verti-
2008;139:S47–S81. Hain TC, Helminski JO, Reis IL, Uddin MK: Vi- go. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 122:
Brandt T, Daroff RB: Physical therapy for benign bration does not improve results of the cana- 647–652.
paroxysmal positional vertigo. Arch Otolar- lith repositioning procedure. Arch Otolar- Parnes LS, McClure JA: Free-floating endo-
yngol 1980;106:484–485. yngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:617–622. lymph particles: a new operative finding
Brandt T, Huppert D, Hecht J, Karch C, Strupp Hall SF, Ruby RR, McClure JA: The mechanics during posterior semicircular canal occlu-
M: Benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo: a of benign paroxysmal vertigo. J Otolaryngol sion. Laryngoscope 1992;102:988–992.
long-term follow-up (6–17 years) of 125 pa- 1979;8:151–158. Prokopakis EP, Chimona T, Tsagournisakis M,
tients. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:160–163. Hornibrook J: Benign paroxysmal positional Christodoulou P, Hirsch BE, Lachanas VA,
Del Rio M, Arriaga MA: Benign positional ver- vertigo (BPPV): history, pathophysiology, Helidonis ES, Plaitakis A, Velegrakis GA:
tigo: prognostic factors. Otolaryngol Head office treatment and future directions. Int J Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: 10-
Neck Surg 2004;130:426–429. Otolaryngol 2011;2011:835671. year experience in treating 592 patients with
Dix MR, Hallpike CS: The pathology, symptom- Imai T, Takeda N, Ito M, Nakamae K, Sakae H, canalith repositioning procedure. Laryngo-
atology and diagnosis of certain common Fujioka H, Matsunaga T, Kubo T: Benign scope 2005;115:1667–1671.
disorders of the vestibular system. Ann Otol paroxysmal positional vertigo due to a si- Sakaida M, Takeuchi K, Ishinaga H, Adachi M,
Rhinol Laryngol 1952;61:987–1016. multaneous involvement of both horizontal Majima Y: Long-term outcome of benign
Epley JM: The canalith repositioning procedure: and posterior semicircular canals. Audiol paroxysmal positional vertigo. Neurology
for treatment of benign paroxysmal posi- Neurootol 2006;11:198–205. 2003;60:1532–1534.
tional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Jang YS, Hwang CH, Shin JY, Bae WY, Kim LS: Schuknecht HF: Cupulolithiasis. Arch Otolar-
1992;107:399–404. Age-related changes on the morphology of yngol 1969;90:765–778.
Epley JM: Human experience with canalith re- the otoconia. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 996– Semont A, Freyss G, Vitte E: Curing the BPPV
positioning maneuvers. Ann NY Acad Sci 1001. with a liberatory maneuver. Adv Otorhino-
2001;942:179–191. Katsarkas A: Benign paroxysmal positional ver- laryngol 1988;42:290–293.
Froehling DA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Beatty tigo (BPPV): idiopathic versus post-traumat- Soto-Varela A, Rossi-Izquierdo M, Santos-Perez
CW, Offord KP, Ballard DJ: Benign position- ic. Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119:745–749. S: Can we predict the efficacy of the semont
al vertigo: incidence and prognosis in a pop- Kerber KA, Helmchen C: Benign paroxysmal maneuver in the treatment of benign parox-
ulation-based study in Olmsted County, positional vertigo: new opportunities but ysmal positional vertigo of the posterior
Minnesota. Mayo Clin Proc 1991; 66: 596– still old challenges. Neurology 2012; 17:154– semicircular canal? Otol Neurotol 2011; 32:
601. 156. 1008–1011.
Furman JM, Cass SP: Benign paroxysmal posi- Lee SH, Kim JS: Benign paroxysmal positional Welling DB, Barnes DE: Particle repositioning
tional vertigo. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1590– vertigo. J Clin Neurol 2010;6:51–63. maneuver for benign paroxysmal positional
1596. vertigo. Laryngoscope 1994;104:946–949.