Letter to Horace
oo
‘My dear Horace,
If what Suetonius tells us about your ining your bed-
room walls with mirrors to enjoy coitus from every angle is
true, you may find this letter a bit dull, On the other hand,
you may be entertained by its coming to you from a part of |
the world whose existence you never suspected, and some
two thousand years after your death, at that: Not bad for a
reflection, is it?
You were
in 8.8.c., though you weren't aware of
‘anew millennium coming. As for myself, Lam fifty-four now;
‘my own millennium, too, has only afew vears to run, What-
‘ever new order of things the future has in store, anticipate
none of it either. So we may talk, I suppose, man to man,
Horace. And I may as well begin with a locker-room kind
of story.
Last night 1 as in bed rereading your Odes, and I
bumped into that one to your fellow poet Rufus Valgius in
which you are trying to convince him not to grieve so much
over the loss of his son (according to some) or his lover
(according to others). You proceed for a couple of stanzas
429 / Letter to Horace
‘with your exempla, telling him that So-and-so lost this per-
son and Such-and-such another, and then you suggest to
Rufus that he, as a kind of self-therapy, get engaged in
praising Augustus’ new triumphs. You mention several re-
cent conquests, among them grabbing some space from the
Seythians
Actually, that must have been the Gelon; butt doesn't
matter. Funny, I hada't noticed this ode belore. My
people—well, in a manner of speaking—aren't mentioned
that often by great poets of Roman antiquity. The Greeks
ae a diferent matter, since they rubbed shoulders with us
‘quite a bit. But even with them we don' fare that well A
few bits in Homer (of which Strabo makes such a meal af-
terward), a dozen lines in Aeschylus, not much more in
Euripides. Passing references, basically; but nomads don't
deserve any better. OF the Romans, I used to think, i was
only poor Ovid who paid us any heed; but then he had no
choice. There is practically nothing about us in Virgil, not
‘to mention Catllus or Propertivs, not to mention Lucretius,
‘And now, lo and behold, erumb from your table.
Perhaps, I said to mysel, 1 sratch him hard enough,
{nay find a reference tothe par of the world I find myself
in now. Who knows, he might have had a fantasy, a
In this line of work that happens.
Bat you never were a visionary. Quiky, unpredictable,
yes—but nota visionary, To advise a griefstricken fellow to
change his tune and sing Caesar's victories—this you could
do; but to imagine another land and another heaven—well,
for that one should turn, I guess, to Ovid. Or wait for another
millennium, On the whol, you Latin poets were bigger on
reflection and rumination than on conjecture. 1 suppose be-
‘ause the empire was lage enough as it was to strain one's
‘on imagination,490 / JOSEPH BRODSKY
So there I was, lying across my unkempt bed, in this un-
imaginable (for you) place, on a cold February night, some
two thousand years later. The only thing I had in common
with you, T thought, was the latitude and, of course, the
litle volume of your Collected, in Russian translations. At
the time you wrote allthis, you see, we didn’t have a lan-
rage, We weren't even we; we were Geloni, Getae, Buin
etc. just bubbles in our own future gene pool. So two thou-
sand years were not for nothing, after all, Now we ean read
you in our own highly inflected language, with its famous
gutta-percha syntax suiting the translation of the likes of you
marvelously
Stil, 1am writing this to you ina language with whose l-
phabet you are more familiar. Alot more, I should add, than I
am. Cyrillic, [am afraid, would only bewilder you even fur-
ther, though you no doubt would recognize the Greek char-
acters. OF course the distance between us is too large to
‘worry about increasing it—or, for that matter, about trying to
shrink it. But the sight of Latin letters may be of some com-
fort to you, no matter how bewildering their use may look
So I was lying atop my bed with the little volume of your
Carmina, The heat was on, but the cold night outside was
winning. It is a small, two-storied wooden affair I ive in
here, and my bedroom is upstaits, As I looked atthe ceiling,
Tould almost see cold seeping through my gambrel roof &
sort of antichaze. No mirrors here. At a certain age one
doesn't care for one’s own reflection, company or no com-
pany; especially if no. That's why I wonder whether Su
tonius tells the truth. Although T imagine you would be
pretty sanguine about that as well. Your famous equipoise!
Besides, for all this latitudinal identity, in Rome it never
ets that cold. A couple of thousand years ago the climate
431 / Letter to Horace
perhaps was different; your lines, though, bear no witness
to that. Anyhow, I was getting sleepy.
‘And I remembered a beauty I once knew in your town.
She lived in Subura, in a small apartment bristling with
flowerpots but redolent with the smell ofthe crumbling ps
perbacks the place was stulfed with. They were everywhere,
bbut mostly on shelves reaching the ceiling (the ceiling, admit-
tedly, was low). Most of them were not hers but belonged to
her neighbor across the hall, about whom I heard a lot but
whom I never met. The neighbor was an old woman, a
widow, who was born and spent her entice life in Libya, in
Leptis Magna. She was Italian but of Jewish extraction—or
:maybe it was her husband who was Jewish, At any rate, when
he died and when things began to heat up in Libya, the old
lady sold her house, packed up her stuf, and came to Rome,
Her apartment was apparently even smaller than my tender
‘companion’s, and jammed with a lifetime's accretions. So the
two women, the old and the young, struck a deal whereupon
the latter's bedroom began to resemble a regular second-
hhand-book store. What jarred with this impression wasn't
so much the bed as the large, heavily framed mirror lean-
ing somewhat precariously against a rickety bookshelf right
across from the bed, and at such an angle that whenever I or
‘my tender companion wanted to imitate you, we had to strain
and crane our necks rather desperately. Otherwise the mir-
ror would frame only mote paperbacks. In the early hours it
could give one an eerie feeling of being transparent. '
Al that happened ages ago, though something nudges
ime to mutter, centuries ago. In an emotional sense, that
would be valid. In fact, the distance between that place in
Subura and my present precincts psychologically is larger
than the one between you and me. Which is to say that in
neither case are “millennia” inapplicable. Or to say that, to
‘me, your realty is practically greater than that of my private492 / Josern Bropsxy
memory. Besides, the name of Leptis Magna interferes with
both. I've always wanted to vist there; in fact, it became a
sott of obsession with me once I began to frequent your town
and Mediterranean shores in general. Well, partly because
1 of the floor mosaics in some bath there contains the only
surviving likeness of Virgil, and a likeness done in his life-
time, at that! Orso I was told; but maybe i's in Tunisia, In
Africa, anyway. When one is cold, one remembers Affica,
And when it's hot, also,
Ah, what wouldn't give to know what the four of you looked
like! To put a face to the lyric, not to mention the epic. 1
‘would settle for a mosaic, though Id prefer a fresco. Worse
comes to worse, L would resign myself to the marbles, except
that the marbles are too generio—everybody gets blond in
‘marble—and too questionable. Somehow, you are the least
cof my concerns, e., you are the easiest to picture. If what
Suetonius tells us about your appearance is indeed true—
at least something in his account must be true!—and you
‘were short and portly, then you most likely looked like Eu-
le or Charlie Chaplin in the King in New York
period. The one I cant picture forthe life of me is Ovid
Even Propertis is easier: skinny, sickly, obsessed with his
‘equally skinny and sickly redhead, he is imaginable. Say, a
«ross between William Powell and Zbigniew Cybulski, But
not Ovid, though he lasted longer than all of you. Als, not
in those parts where they carved likenesses. Or lad mosaics
Or bothered with frescoes. And if anything of the sort was
done before your beloved Augustus kicked him out of Rome,
then it was no doubt destroyed, So as not to offend high
sensibilities. And afterward—well, afterward any shb of
‘marble would do, As we used to say in northern Seythia—
Hyperborea to you—paper can endure anything, and in your
day marble was kind of paper.
genio Mon
433 / Letter to Horace
You think Lam rambling, but Iam just trying to reproduce
the train of thought that took me late last ight to an un.
usually graphic destination. It meandered abit, for sure; but
‘not that much, For, one way or another, I've always been
thinking about you four, especially about Ovid. About Pub
lius Ovidius Naso. And not for reasons of some particular af=
finity. No matter how similar my circumstances may now and
then appear to his in the eyes of some beholder, I won't
Produce any Metamorphoses. Besides, twenty-two years in
‘these parts won't rival ten in Sarmatia. Not to mention that I
saw my Terza Roma crumble. Ihave my vanity, but it has its
limits. Now that they are drawn by age, they are more palpa.
Dle than before. But even as a young pup, kicked out of my
hhome to the Polar Circle, I never fancied myself playing his
double. Though then my empire looked indeed eternal, and
‘one could roam on the ice ofour many delta all winter long.
No, I never could conjure Naso’ fice. Sometimes I see
him played by James Mason—a hazel eye soggy with grief
and mischief; at other times, though, it's Paull Newman's
winter-gray stare, But, then, Naso was a very protean fellow,
with Janus no doubt presiding over his lares. Did you two
get long, or was the age diflerence too big to bother?
‘Twenty-two years, after all. You must have known him, at
least through Maecenas. Or did you just think him too ffiv-
lous, saw it coming? Was there bad blood between you? He
must have thought you ridiculously loyal, true blue ina sort
‘of quaint, selE:made man’s kind of way. And to you he, was
just a punk, an aristo, privileged from the eradle, ete. Not
like you and Anthony Perkins's Virgil, practically working.
class boys, only five years’ diference. Or is this too much
Karl Marx reading and moviegoing, Horace? Perhaps. But
wait, there is more. There is Dr. Freud coming into this,
too, for what sort of interpretation of dreams is it, if t's notfiltered through good old Ziggy? For it was my good old
subconscious the tran of thought I just mentioned was taking
‘me to, late lastnight, and at some speed.
Anyhow, Naso was greater than both of you—well, a least
as far as 'm concerned. Metrically, ofcourse, more monot-
30 is Virgil. And so is Propertius, forall his emo-
tional intensity. In any case, my Latin stinks; that’s why I
read you all in Russian. It copes with your asclepiadie verse
ina far more convincing way than the language Iam writing
this in, for all the familiarity of the latter’ alphabet. The
latter just can't handle dactyls. Which were your forte, More
exactly, Latin’s forte. And your Carmina i their
showease, So 1am reduced to judging the stuff by the quality
of imagination. (Here's your defense, if you need one.) And
fn that score Naso beats you all.
All the same, I can't conjure up your fives, his espe