Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Define Support
Support comprises everything indispensable for sustenance, dwelling, clothing, medical attendance,
education and transportation, in keeping with the financial capacity of the family. (Article 194 of the
Family Code of the Philippines)
2. What are the factors that are considered in determining support to be awarded?
The law is silent as to the exact amount of support that should be given. The amount of support is
never fixed. Once given, the amount of support shall be reduced or increased proportionally according
to the two factors.
The factors that should be considered when determining the amount of support are
(b) The resources or means of the person obliged to furnish the same.
(c) Parents and their legitimate children and the legitimate and illegitimate children of the latter;
(d) Parents and their illegitimate children and the legitimate and illegitimate children of the latter;
(a) When the recipient is an illegitimate child and the person obliged to give support is legal married
to a woman who is not the mother of the child. (Pascual v, Martinez, C.A. 37 O.G. 2418)
(b) When the father has been shown to have previously maltreated the child severely. (Pascual v.
Martinez, C.A. 37 O.G. 2418)
(c) When the wife is maltreated for refusing to perform unchaste acts with the husband (Goitia v.
Campos Rueda, 35 Phil. 576)
(d) When the father has been criminally guilty of seduction (U.S. v. Alvir, 9 Phil. 576)
(e) When the wife cannot live with the husband and her mother-in-law because of constant quarrels
arising from in-law relationship (Del Rosario v. Del Rosario, C.A. 46 O.G. No. 12, p. 6122)
12. What are the requirements for an illegitimate child to receive support from their
biological parent?
There are two kinds of illegitimate children:
(a) A recognized illegitimate child – where the child can use the surname of his father. The
filiation can be recognized by the father through:
a. The recognition of the father of the child’s paternity through the record of birth appearing in the
civil registrar;
b. When admission is made in a public document;
c. When admission is made in a private hand written document.
(b) An unrecognized illegitimate child – where a child is not acknowledged by his biological
father and thus has to use the surname of his mother.
If the child had been recognized by his father, he is entitled to support. But if he is an unrecognized
child, relationship between the child and the father must first be proved. Once paternity has been
proved, only then the child is entitled to child support from the father.
14. My petition for annulment of my marriage was successful. Am I still required to support
my ex-wife?
No. you are no longer obliged to support your ex-wife. Once the marital bond has been severed, the
obligation to support one’s spouse ceases. This is due to the fact that only those who are husband and
wife are required to render mutual help and support to each other.
15. What if the hearing for the petition of annulment was still ongoing, am I obliged to
support my wife even though we are already separated?
Yes. The right to support is not lost even if the spouse is gainfully employed as long as he or she still
needs support. (Canonizado v. Almeda-Lopez, 109 Phil. 1169)
16. What if, my wife and I are legally separated, how is support determined, considering
we have a child?
When the obligation to give support falls upon two or more persons, the payment of the support shall
be divided between them in proportion with the resources of each.
However, the judge may order only one of them to furnish the support provisionally, without prejudice
to his right to claim from the other obligors the share due from them, in the following instances:
17. My wife filed a case for annulment and support against me. Am I obliged to pay her
support even if the case has not yet been decided by the Court?
Yes, you are obliged to give support to your wife for the benefit of your children with her.
In all cases involving a child, his interest and welfare are always the paramount concerns. There may
be instances where, in view of the poverty of the child, it would be a travesty of justice to refuse him
support until the decision of the trial court attains finality while time continues to slip away. (Gan v.
Reyes, G.R. No. 145527, May 28 2002)
The money and property adjudged for support and education should and must be given presently and
without delay because if it had to wait the final judgment, the children may in the meantime have
suffered because of lack of food or have missed and lost years in school because of lack of funds. One
cannot delay the payment of such funds for support and education for the reason that if paid long
afterwards, however much the accumulated amount, its payment cannot cure the evil and repair the
damage caused. The children with such belated payment for support and education cannot act as
gluttons and eat voraciously and unwisely, afterwards, to make up for the years of hunger and
starvation. Neither may they enrol in several classes and schools and take up numerous subjects all at
once to make up for the years they missed in school, due to non-payment of the funds when
needed. (De Leon v. Soriano, G.R. No. L-7648, September 17, 1954)
18. My wife was convicted of adultery. Am I still obliged to give support to her?
No. you are no longer obliged to give support to your wife. The wife who committed adultery loses the
right to support. (Quintana v. Lerma, 24 Phil. 285)
However, mere allegation that the wife has committed adultery will not bar her from the right to
support pendente lite. The alleged adultery of the wife must be established by competent
evidence. (Reyes v. Ines-Luciano, 88 SCRA 803)
(a) Renounced;
21. My son recently died and there is an on-going demand for support while he was still
alive. What will happen now?
The death of the child extinguishes the right to support. The mother of the child cannot receive the
support of the said child. The death removed the only valid cause for the judgment of support, and the
lower court has rightly held that respondent’s obligation ceased with that eventuality. (Malabana v.
Abeto, 74 Phil. 13)