This document summarizes a court case from 1956 regarding an appeal of an order dismissing a plaintiff's action to recover possession and ownership of several parcels of land and a lot with a house. The order from the Court of First Instance of Manila was set aside, with costs against the appellees. The appellants were directed to amend their complaint to include the executrix of the estate of one of the defendant parties.
This document summarizes a court case from 1956 regarding an appeal of an order dismissing a plaintiff's action to recover possession and ownership of several parcels of land and a lot with a house. The order from the Court of First Instance of Manila was set aside, with costs against the appellees. The appellants were directed to amend their complaint to include the executrix of the estate of one of the defendant parties.
This document summarizes a court case from 1956 regarding an appeal of an order dismissing a plaintiff's action to recover possession and ownership of several parcels of land and a lot with a house. The order from the Court of First Instance of Manila was set aside, with costs against the appellees. The appellants were directed to amend their complaint to include the executrix of the estate of one of the defendant parties.
and appellants, vs. ASUNCION BUNAG VDA. DE MADRIGAL, ET AL., defendants and appellees.
Appeal from an order of the Court of First Instance of
Manila, dismissing plaintiff’s action to recover the possession and ownership of seven parcels of land situated in the province of Camarines Sur, one parcel of land situated in the province of Marinduque, and one lot and a house situated in the City of Manila. Order appealed from is set aside with costs against the appellees. Appellants are directed to amend the complaint so as to include the executrix of the estate of the party defendant. Bautista Angelo, J., ponente.