The experimental group consisted of twenty-eight students at the beginning of all the respective courses

and twenty-five students at the end of all the respective courses. The three students who dropped out
did not do so due to feelings of anxiety. The control group consisted of thirty-three students at the
beginning of all the respective courses and twenty-four students at the end of all the respective courses.
Of the nine control group students who dropped out of the course, four students stated that they did so
due to feelings of anxiety related The experimental group consisted of twenty-eight students at the
beginning of all the respective courses and twenty-five students at the end of all the respective courses.
The three students who dropped out did not do so due to feelings of anxiety. The control group
consisted of thirty-three students at the beginning of all the respective courses and twenty-four
students at the end of all the respective courses. Of the nine control group students who dropped out of
the course, four students stated that they did so due to feelings of anxiety related to the speaking
component of the course. The researcher, therefore, concludes that the drop-out rates for the
experimental groups were lower due to the intervention of humanistic techniques.

The Table 2.1 shows the effect of visualization in the understanding the poem. In terms of text as a
treatment, it computed the value with 18.808 while in drawing as a treatment, it computed the value of
16.75., which is both text and drawing interprets as significant and the decision in both text and drawing
are reject. It means, using visualization is effective in experimental group.

In Table 3.1, it shows the difference in the scores of the control and experimental group. The calculated
probability failed to reject because it calculate with .582 which it exceeds from .500 in the calculated
probability. The test computed the t-value with -0.564 which it interprets as not significant. It means,
there’s a big difference of the test results between experimental and control group. It becomes effective
when we are using visualization in teaching poetry.

The experimental group consisted of twenty-eight students at the beginning of all the respective courses
and twenty-five students at the end of all the respective courses. The three students who dropped out
did not do so due to feelings of anxiety. The control group consisted of thirty-three students at the
beginning of all the respective courses and twenty-four students at the end of all the respective courses.
Of the nine control group students who dropped out of the course, four students stated that they did so
due to feelings of anxiety related to the speaking component of the course. The researcher, therefore,
concludes that the drop-out rates for the experimental groups were lower due to the intervention of
humanistic techniques.

The Table 2.1 shows the effect of visualization in the understanding the poem. In terms of text as a
treatment, it computed the value with 18.808 while in drawing as a treatment, it computed the value of
16.75., which is both text and drawing interprets as significant and the decision in both text and drawing
are reject. It means, using visualization is effective in experimental group.
In Table 3.1, it shows the difference in the scores of the control and experimental group. The calculated
probability failed to reject because it calculate with .582 which it exceeds from .500 in the calculated
probability. The test computed the t-value with -0.564 which it interprets as not significant. It means,
there’s a big difference of the test results between experimental and control group. It becomes effective
when we are using visualization in teaching poetry.

to the speaking component of the course. The researcher, therefore, concludes that the drop-out rates
for the experimental groups were lower due to the intervention of humanistic techniques.

The Table 2.1 shows the effect of visualization in the understanding the poem. In terms of text as a
treatment, it computed the value with 18.808 while in drawing as a treatment, it computed the value of
16.75., which is both text and drawing interprets as significant and the decision in both text and drawing
are reject. It means, using visualization is effective in experimental group.

In Table 3.1, it shows the difference in the scores of the control and experimental group. The calculated
probability failed to reject because it calculate with .582 which it exceeds from .500 in the calculated
probability. The test computed the t-value with -0.564 which it interprets as not significant. It means,
there’s a big difference of the test results between experimental and control group. It becomes effective
when we are using visualization in teaching poetry.

The experimental group consisted of twenty-eight students at the beginning of all the respective courses
and twenty-five students at the end of all the respective courses. The three students who dropped out
did not do so due to feelings of anxiety. The control group consisted of thirty-three students at the
beginning of all the respective courses and twenty-four students at the end of all the respective courses.
Of the nine control group students who dropped out of the course, four students stated that they did so
due to feelings of anxiety related to the speaking component of the course. The researcher, therefore,
concludes that the drop-out rates for the experimental groups were lower due to the intervention of
humanistic techniques.

The Table 2.1 shows the effect of visualization in the understanding the poem. In terms of text as a
treatment, it computed the value with 18.808 while in drawing as a treatment, it computed the value of
16.75., which is both text and drawing interprets as significant and the decision in both text and drawing
are reject. It means, using visualization is effective in experimental group.
In Table 3.1, it shows the difference in the scores of the control and experimental group. The calculated
probability failed to reject because it calculate with .582 which it exceeds from .500 in the calculated
probability. The test computed the t-value with -0.564 which it interprets as not significant. It means,
there’s a big difference of the test results between experimental and control group. It becomes effective
when we are using visualization in teaching poetry.