The original timeline and research that I constructed for this particular case is confidential, and
protected under the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine, and therefore cannot be
disclosed. In lieu of the specific material, I have written a legal narrative below for this case. My
legal narrative will discuss the facts of the case, the sides of the case, and the legal research as
well as work that I have done to help with that particular case.
Facts of the Case:
John Doe is charged with violating Federal anti-bribery and wire fraud statutes. There are a
plethora of recordings that the opposing side claims hints at John Doe performing certain actions
that leads to the suspicion of John Doe committing bribery.
Sides of Case:
Whether John Doe participated in a bribery scheme and solicited funds in violation of his
contract.
Whether John Doe’s actions is a breach of contract.
Legal Research
As for the legal research in this case, I was given the responsibility of reading through transcripts
of the recordings in order to find any significant evidence that can hurt or harm the case. There
were over 100 transcripts I had to read through. So for each transcript that had some significant
information in it, I would write down the transcript number, the line number of the dialogue, and
a synopsis of what the dialogue entailed and why it’s important for the case.
Analysis:
From the findings, I learned that the evidence will require more research and work from the team
to determine a trial and defense strategy. Should intent be a factor, the evidence did not seem to
point to any ill-will or malicious intent on behalf of John Doe which may be a positive factor as
the team works to resolve this matter.