Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BIO 203L - Ecology Lab - PER PDF
BIO 203L - Ecology Lab - PER PDF
Topics to be covered:
1. Statistics and Data Management Mann-Whitney
- nonparametric, comparison, unmatched
T-test
2-Group Example: Problem Set D
Z-test
A herpetologist studying the effect of a deadly fungal
Parametric
Comparison
Analysis of disease on frogs wanted to find out if the altitude of the
3,4,5-Group
Variance (ANOVA) frog’s habitat makes a difference in the prevalence of the
Correlation Pearson
disease among resident animals. She delineated two
study sites (A and B) found on different altitudinal areas
Association Chi-Square (A = 20 masl, B = 350 masl), and set up eight traps in each
of the sites (total of 16 traps). She left the traps in the sites
for a few days, and went back to collect the captured
Mann-Whitney frogs and count how many tested positive for the fungal
2-Group disease in each trap, Upon her return, she found out that
Wilcoxon one trap in site B was missing, so the data for this trap was
Non-Parametric
Comparison
not counted. Tabulating her results, she arrived at the
3,4,5-Group Kruskal-Wallis following values:
SITE A 8 12 15 21 25 44 44 60 n= 8
Correlation Spearman SITE B 2 4 5 9 12 17 19 n= 7
Hypotheses:
Association Chi-Square H0: There is no significant difference between the two samples.
H1: There is a significant difference between the two samples.
Parametric Tests - anything you can measure 1. Rank the data. Data items that have equal values are given the
- can be between 2 points average rank of those items.
- comparison of the means 1 2 SITE A rank SITE B rank
e.g. length, time, weight, temperature 2 4 8 4 2 1
3 5 12 6.5 4 2
Non-Parametric Tests - cannot find a value in between
4 8 15 8 5 3
- deals with ranks 5 9 21 11 9 5
- comparison of the medians 6.5 12 25 12 12 6.5
e.g. number of males in the classroom 6.5 12 44 13.5 17 9
8 15 44 13.5 19 10
Comparison Test - used to know whether 2 or more 9 17 60 15
groups are the same or equal, if not 𝑛1 =8 𝑛2 = 7
10 19
which is greater? which is smaller? 11 21 Total of ranks of SITE B 36.5
Correlation Test - used to know the relationship between 12 25
2 or sometimes 3 groups whether they 13.5 44
are directly or inversely related and by 13.5 44
how much? 15 60
NOTICE that your value is either between 1 and 0 or 0 and 1
2. Use the following formulae to solve for 𝑈1 and 𝑈2 :
VALUE: the closer your value to zero, the 𝑛 (𝑛2 +1)
weaker the relationship 𝑈1 = 𝑛1 𝑛2 + 2 − 𝑅2
2
SIGN: positive sign means it is directly related; 𝑈2 = 𝑛1 𝑛2 − 𝑈1
negative means it is inversely related where 𝑛1 = number of observations in first column
0.90-1.00 very weak correlation 𝑛2 = number of observations in second column
0.70-0.89 weak correlation 𝑅2 = sum of the ranks in the second column
7(7 + 1)
0.40-0.69 modest correlation 𝑈1 = (8)(7) +
2
− 36.5
0.20-0.39 strong correlation 𝑼𝟏 = 𝟒𝟕. 𝟓
0.00-0.19 very strong correlation 𝑈2 = (8)(7) − 47.5
Association Test - used to know which group or groups 𝑼𝟐 = 𝟖. 𝟓
show an affinity to a set of conditions 3. Reject H0 if the computed lower U value > critical U value.
𝑛1 =8; 𝑛2 =7; level of confidence = 0.05
Unmatched - uses 2 different population critical U value = 10
computed lower U value = 8.5
Matched - uses the same population 8.5<10
Fail to reject H0.
© 2015 Ellement
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS Reviewer
Ecology LAB page 2
𝑛𝑖 10 𝑔1 10 𝑔2 10 𝑔3 10 𝑔4
𝑋̅𝑗 83.6 146.4 79.4 56.4 78.6 98.4 75.4 154.4
∑ 𝑋̅𝑗
̿ 79.25
𝑿 =
𝐽
𝑆𝑆𝐸 = ∑ 𝑔𝑖
𝑆𝑆𝑇 = 𝑆𝑆𝑇𝑅 + 𝑆𝑆𝐸
where 𝑆𝑆𝑇𝑅 = Treatment Sum of Squares
𝑆𝑆𝐸 = Error Sum of Squares
𝑆𝑆𝑇 = Total Sum of Squares
𝑛𝑖 = sample size
𝑋̅𝑗 = mean
𝑋̿ = grand mean
𝑔𝑖 = mean of the (𝑿𝒋 − 𝑿̅)𝟐
𝑑𝑓𝑡𝑟 = 𝑘 − 1
𝑑𝑓𝑒 = 𝑛 − 𝑘
𝑑𝑓𝑡 = 𝑑𝑓𝑡𝑟 + 𝑑𝑓𝑒
where 𝑘 = number of populations
𝑛 = number of observations
© 2015 Ellement
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS Reviewer
Ecology LAB page 3
81 27.5 81 27.5 80 23.5 80 23.5 2. Using the formula below, get the value of r.
80 23.5 82 30.5 78 17 75 6.5 𝑁 ∑ 𝑥𝑦 − ∑ 𝑥 ∑ 𝑦
80 23.5 76 10 83 33.5 76 10 𝑟 =
89 40 76 10 84 36 75 6.5 √[𝑁 ∑ 𝑥 2 − (∑ 𝑥)2 ][𝑁 ∑ 𝑦 2 − (∑ 𝑦)2 ]
TOTAL 309.5 TOTAL 217.5 TOTAL 190 TOTAL 106 10(16367.4) − (91.9)(1654)
𝑟 =
2. Complete the ANOVA Table: √[10(881.99) − (91.9)2 ][10(329626) − (1654)2 ]
𝑘 𝑟 = 0.8058
12 𝑅𝑖 2
𝐻 = (∑ ) − 3(𝑁 + 1) 3. Based from the following, determine the correlation between
𝑁(𝑁 + 1) 𝑛𝑖 the two groups.
𝑖=1
VALUE: the closer your value to zero, the weaker the
𝑑𝑓 = 𝑘 − 1 relationship
where 𝐻 = Kruskal-Wallis value
SIGN: positive sign means it is directly related;
𝑁 = number of total scores
𝑘 = sample size negative means it is inversely related
𝑅𝑖 = ranked total per sample Since 𝑟 = 0.8058, the relationship between the horn length
𝑛𝑖 = number of scores per sample and mass shows a strong positive correlation.
12 309.52 217.52 1902 1062
𝐻 = {( )( + + + )}
40(40 + 1) 10 10 10 10
− 3(𝑁 + 1)
𝐻 = 𝟏𝟔. 𝟑𝟒
𝑑𝑓 = 4 − 1
𝑑𝑓 = 3
3. Reject H0 if the computed H value > critical X2 value.
𝑑𝑓 =3; level of confidence = 0.05
critical X2 value = 7.8147
computed H value = 16.34
16.34>7.8147
Reject H0.
© 2015 Ellement
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS Reviewer
Ecology LAB page 4
Chi-Square
- non/parametric, association
𝑋 2 =60.6923
𝑑𝑓 = (𝑟 − 1)(𝑐 − 1)
𝑑𝑓 = (3 − 1)(4 − 1)
𝑑𝑓 = 6
4. Reject H0 if the computed X2 value > critical X2 value.
𝑑𝑓 =6; level of confidence = 0.05
critical X2 value = 12.592
computed X2 value =60.6923
60.6923>.592
Reject H0.
© 2015 Ellement
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS Reviewer
Ecology LAB page 5
© 2015 Ellement
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATIONS Reviewer
Ecology LAB page 6
Abundance/Species Richness (𝑆) When only one species is present, the value of H is 0.
When all species are present in equal numbers, the maximum
- count of number of species occurring within the community
values of index, 𝐻𝑚𝑎𝑥 = ln 𝑆, where 𝑆 = total number of species
Relative Abundance/Species Evenness
𝑛𝑖 *Relative Dominance
𝑅𝐷𝑖 = - absolute dominance of species i divided by the sum of
𝑁 dominance for all species
where 𝑅𝐷𝑖 = abundance of species 𝑖 - usually done with trees
𝑛𝑖 = number of individuals of species 𝑖
**Rank Dominance
𝑁 = total number of individuals of all species
Rank-Abundance Frequency
Whittaker plot/Rank-Abundance Curve # 𝑜𝑓 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑖
- species ranking based on relative abundance, ranked from
𝐹𝑖 =
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 # 𝑜𝑓 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑠 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑑
most to least abundant ) x-axis and relative abundance (y- Relative Frequency
axis) expressed on a log10 axis.
- a 2D chart with relative abundance on the Y-axis and the
𝐹𝑖
𝑅𝐹𝑖 =
abundance rank on the X-axis 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦
on Species Richness
- reflected by the greater length of the curve
on Species Evenness
- equitable distribution of individuals among species
- indicated by the more gradual slope of the curve
e.g.
Density
𝐴𝑖
𝐷𝑖 =
𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎
where 𝐴𝑖 = total number of individuals of species 𝑖
Relative Density
𝐷𝑖
𝑅𝐷𝑖 =
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦
Diversity&Dominance
Simpson’s Index
𝑛𝑖 2
𝐷 = ∑( )
𝑁
Simpson’s Index of Diversity = 1 − 𝐷
1
Simpson’s Diversity Index =
𝐷
where 𝐷 = Simpson’s index
𝑛𝑖 = number of individuals of species 𝑖
𝑁 = total number of individuals of all species
The greater the value of D, the lower the diversity
The greater the Simpson’s Index of Diversity, the greater the
diversity
A D value of 1 represents complete dominance meaning only
one species is present in the community.
Shannon-Weiner’s Index
𝑛𝑖
𝑝𝑖 =
𝑁
𝐻′ = ∑(𝑝𝑖 )(ln 𝑝𝑖 )
where 𝑝𝑖 = proportion of individuals found in species 𝑖
𝑛𝑖 = number of individuals in species 𝑖
𝑁 = total number of individuals of all species
© 2015 Ellement