You are on page 1of 5

Customer: TOYO ENGINEERING

Project: Chambal fertilisers and chemicals limited


Doc. Name: Comment response Sheet
Job No.: pv-501 (top platform)

S. PAGE
No. NO. (REPORT) comments received

1 1 one load is missing in calculation , please refer comments on drawing VD-M-A06-STA-DWG-AYDA002-130D


2 1 reaction of top platform & load applied on circular platform is not matching &needs to update after applic
3 1 in current staad file reaction of top platform is applied on circular platform in a single load case , it is advisa
4 1 load combinations:- pipe operation load shall be combine with wind load and seismic load. Currently this c
5 1 separate parameter & load factor for serviceability &strength design shall be apply as per is 800 2007 LSD
6 1 in circular platform staad file load combinations are missing
7 1 calculation sheet, analysis method is shown as LRFD but actual analysis done by ASD method. It is requeste
8 1 knee bracing work point needs to be updated in staad file as per shown in vendor drawings 1)18 deg 2)135
AEPL REPLY

comment is incorporated
comment will be incorporated on circular platform report
in current stadd file maximum load reaction of top platform is applied on circular platform which is more conservative ,but ap
no such case is given in IS 800 2007 LSD
comment is incorporated
comment will be incorporated on circular platform report
comment is incorporated
both the work point in staad file matches as shown in drawing,but in report all the views are shown in isometric so both degre
ore conservative ,but appling reaction as per your comments will consider only one load case of top platform at one time which is not safe

isometric so both degrees shown here seems to be reversed.


orm at one time which is not safe . i.e. when live load case is applied in circular platform,load reaction of pipe load which are actually acti
f pipe load which are actually acting in top platform cannot be applied

You might also like