Physics Forums [Iwamonsoue fons scisnos woREs EsNeNS since = Forums > Mathematics > Topology and Analysis > = Man * (Euler's Formula - Moving Particle Argument (Needham) = ones ro — Poe | | am reading Wstan Needham’ Dook “Visual Complex Analysts" and am cuventty focussed on Chapt = ain particular | em trying to follow Needham's heurstic argument in support of, oF justfying, Euler’s form — SM="siNm—. pving pees cat Seton (Nena are moving ong a a= Saute Neodnam then argues that each new vee Instant by Instr, wl be tht anles tos new peson vero ( 27? presumably because theuncion i cause rotation of 0 depres that gh?) We then anes tht tis leo” that he pti wil rave around # ui cee. BUT. why ema i this he case? inden how do we rlgorousy prove tat is sth case G2 Physics Forums “enone Foun beinseine bees rive Nene sane Te relevant part of Needham ets as follows: 1 Euler's Formula ce pn mn wb ma ae et te [7 coe + ! «@ ‘Teens cry Lashes Ea A ant il ey Prsion arse ei tn ny eo meng viet wom Cory. ap ar ach we mae Ok ‘ine atin then thy ag a boty Se Alife hemes on (ne) (ee) waren, Pty sity ming esa nay tet Farr ea ee ae eb ge i eo Sig ty her ne eae Prot en ana cp gry rea 12 Moveg Porte Argument Fel te a et at town dt: et = oT aly inept bf) = fs aa Fw een fer) Pia lene an 2 mayb et ee G2 Physics Forums “enone Town ScTsbine Vibes PMEEE MEWS stan i WY lini gant cere geninitial velocity = é d initial position = 1 Figure [8] Since we now know that [Z(0)] remains equal fo I throughout the motion it follows that the particle's speed |V()| also remains equal to 1. Thus after time 1 = 6 the particle will have vavelleda distance @ round the unit eirle, and so the angle of Z(0) = e® will be2. This s the geometric statement of Euler's formula, Now oust further question based on 2 claim inthe last parzgraph above. GePhysics Forums Semone YouNS WSTSBL0s VDEOS PMBESMES SEARCH “Thus ater tne t= @ the particle wil have traveled! a distance Ovound the nit cl, and so the ange of Z(0) =e willbe @. ‘This the geometric ststemet of Euler's forms. Hy questions... what way . at Showy Ins the geomet Statement of Euler ormula ep wi be appreciates. iTS B06 DERE BHNSKSNEWS SEARCH {ene pte i tween sine BUT nove tn cee Pc eBay ove ‘Zicrstaticow 1) you believe the ‘tight angles’ you have no tangential acceleration, so constant i, Since = 42, it must be tht |2| tsalso 2 Fe onstane Crete moter [(0)| = so unt cra a a : gens ‘lah orales = Iner products zeros constant It youre loolang friar then Needham’ bookclenet what youre loki for Don. get me wrong, an excellent work But from igoous and not tay ey to supply the gor yousetMath Amateur 5 Physics Forums [osmonsctie ins tunsnos ves masses asuce 2 ae roeangar > merpraictinaee +P ean Trans moet elf. ft. lam sl punted egpding how Nesanom® sequent sipporeproves Euler formula Thanks aa eter Math Amateur or ‘rye ong gr en Reams oe awe DANG ME mors, SEEN WE AS PM) pre any 9 Eg peee erate GE Physics Forums oe Peter agree with ym but somtines i good not wry about the foundations too mach to become faa wth a lage suctre. You cn slays return tothe basement ng ste stage « Ea 7a ron mecransrpnen eons ees oe oyu nave [i constant, rane tm repeating Meecha Pie [|= 1 & Am argz) 9 2 = costs 4 sind) Zeon + Lain onus NSCS LOG VIDEOS HSICSNEWS QSAR HIENU.. Tonks for both your new poss. YER thous pol. geting an des of the bla pcre er a basic understanding of haw things work In generals 3 important. You ave caused me thik yet again = thik i sti worth doing Needham, Needham contains so much infomation and cool background hat you wen fn ia any other book n compte neta, Sure, the book's not rigorous a ll Antik mony ofthe arguments in Neco an even be mde ‘igeroue But Needham ic lz an amazing read and Gives you much itn. Really worth.€/at(cos() + isin(@)) = —sin( 0) + ico9(8) ane tis cual i(cos(0) + iain() 20ers rm e by a constant But they ore so they are equal forall teva) + sin(0) cess uniform ceca motion so geometrical Evlers formula says the e eserves utr cule motion 3 well G2 Physics Forums “omonsone es eee unity (1) allow dec trom te Talo expansion tel and ight side. So why ae all nee wip explanations needed? anya ey ote ya eis he ane gh aes Sy te a hese ern Mee? Because gves lot of rest muon about the Euler formule you thik atin Is not necessary then Needham st the book fr you shape it woul be insuctvethough very wimp @@) to workout the salon to the diferent equation dy/AB = iy vis complex so y= w+ iv where wand var el valued functions of G2Physics Forums oemon sue Fons eeinseine Woces pie Nes sane Perm Tne slutn off yy For =Ou=iande fs prey iaginary 20 ud + = Doc? +? = C fr same cnctantC. oC =tandul + oa. Since tne rel part of dy/yis eo the equation becomes f ud — du = Jd since v= Tas tude = —u T= wean du = (1 — 02) T= waste te nan ital s f—//T= wich ‘etagrates oth inverse asin ‘cen nat = co) te eterna equation gies aim) am eg san Neoen ok Ye Canpe ays UPR Sen CR SEN WES. 8 (peta! an gow Netanya oppo sting ema Aenea? eS Beeesne Fieeteme ——mcnpr Sewn 2. Neeman consis pace meng ag zane mo -e iene © Physics Forums _penorsat FORRS — WBGITS Re _YBEEEPMSKSNEWE — QSURON ve Zio therefore perpendesar to Z een sere 5 tepals NCC BUT. yy 5 Dae”. ne Po owe ges noe mans cae? ‘One way 0 think oft sha he vlecy vec has no component pling ana or towards the agin then theastance of the cuve ees Tenis so uch Lavinio «. aporeciate your help.= “eo9qee eaten deculon wh tere oF Have someting to add? Ww © Physics Forums PRE we wera rem) veces cas Physics Forums oemon sue Fons WBeinseine Wokes PEE NEMS sane > Ie Mawseconspast lantineDenesIs Aloeayemacane=—MenSpanine Tr Samay tacan le Dosen omaa rin Soe vera Deer cnmrest on non panera? ones Devers cssernge sine ymca rs wae pr te sug 205 Forums > Matwonacs > Topooay ad Anis > a connsct MeL ABOUT TOP Ae GW HO (emer 2o.e pieones Termana ies cay