Professional Documents
Culture Documents
When we talk about quality of work life, we believe that the only thing that is
involved in this term is strictly work, that is, that an environment conducive to kindness,
respect and harmony together with a beautiful workplace is what every employee You want
and that if a company offers this, it is immediately and completely offering quality of
working life, but the reality is different, nowadays this term has been working for a long
time. Although it is not difficult to define, it has been somewhat complex because that is
quality of working life for some people is not quality of working life for others, that is, if
we go to the context of an organization what is quality of working life for the boss is not
quality of working life for employees and this is what usually happens, the organization
offers merely labor incentives with those who believe that the employee will feel
comfortable and satisfied, but the employee is more than an employee, is immerser or in
other spheres apart from his place of work, he is an integral being who probably has family,
friends and interests different to his profession (hobbies). But what is the quality of
working life? The quality of working life can be defined in many ways and from different
approaches, since it is a term that has been working since 1960 and has gone through a
variety of changes and adjustments, the most accurate definition would be:
"The quality of working life, at a given time, corresponds to the condition of an individual
in his or her dynamic pursuit of their hierarchically organized objectives within the
domains of work where the reduction of the gap separating the individual from these
objectives is reflected in a positive result impact on the general quality of life of the
individual, the organizational performance and, consequently, in the general functioning of
Although the discussion on the definition of quality of work life is still unfinished, it
could be said that according to the above it is a fact that when talking about quality of
working life, the person should be considered as an integral human being where quality of
working life will help you achieve your goals inside and outside the company. In a study
(Sojka, 2014), 24 experts focused on different areas were gathered to decide which
characteristics were important in the quality of life at work; it was concluded that there are
primary, secondary and tertiary characteristics; the primary characteristics refer directly to
the workplace, the secondary characteristics refer to the characteristics that are generally
common in all workplaces (posts) and the tertiary characteristics refer to characteristics that
go beyond the organization as for example the image of the organization. Talking about the
characteristics that should include the quality of working life is no less complicated than
talking about the definition, but in the study that I have just mentioned there is a big gap to
interview that I made the quality of work life goes beyond the work place because each
member in an organization is different from the other, therefore, each member has different
needs, objectives and goals to achieve, what I want to say is that as well as there is the
employee who is only interested in the company and does not dislike that the organization
does not worry about their personal interests there is also the type of employee who would
like the organization to care about their family or their future goals. The person I
interviewed said in text words "I like that the company shows me that I am an important
part of the process we are taking, I like that they promote harmony between my colleagues
and me, that they give us a decent treatment, but beyond I like that they care about my
satisfaction and I really am satisfied because it is a company that integrates my family, that
cares about the fulfillment of my personal goals, for example in a couple of months I will
finish paying my apartment with help from a savings I've made since I've been working
Westley (1979) explains that job satisfaction is one of the problems of quality of
work life, explains that dissatisfaction occurs because the remuneration of their work is not
adequate, feeling that the work is damaging personally, among others. This personal harm
that is mentioned could be taken as the organization only worry that the employee is
efficient without them having to worry about their overall well-being, something like
receiving a lot in exchange for practically giving nothing, because although the money It is
one of the biggest rewards in the job, most times it is not enough and the employees expect
more, the person I interviewed said that he left the previous company where he worked
because they did not worry absolutely anything about his assets or inside nor outside the
company, according to Westley, job dissatisfaction is a strong reason for people to leave
their positions in organizations and therefore the company does not last long their
employees and that is why they do not progress. If we see this more detailed, it can be seen
as a chain and as an exchange in which both parties can benefit. When I say that job
satisfaction in quality of life at work can be seen as a chain I mean that if the person feels
good in the work environment and also sees that the organization cares or contributes in the
other areas of work. his life will perform in his labors and he will feel comfortable in the
other spheres in which he is involved, that is, it is a chain and this leads to it also being seen
as an exchange because if the person feels good in the other spheres of his life thanks to his
quality of working life likewise will respond in his work to his superiors being an excellent
employee producing profits in the company and likewise progress. The quality of life in the
workplace is an effective way for both parties since they know how to manage, since one of
the criteria of the quality of life according to (Walton, 1986) is the adequate compensation,
that the incentives must be offered to the employees if they prove they deserve them. In
conclusion, if the organization knows how to manage the quality of life at work as the tool
to reach change in the lives of its workers and for progress, they will achieve a balance
between the needs of all those who make up the company and this balance It is the best way
to success.
References
MARTEL, J. P. – DUPUIS, G., 2006: Quality of work life: Theoretical and methological
Sojka, L. (2014). Specification of the Quality of Work Life Characteristics in the Slovak
Westley, W. (1979). Problems and Solutions in the Quality of Working Life. Human