Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Annexure A-G - 02.05.2018

    Uploaded by

    Charles Cilliers
    2K views24 pages
    Patricia de Lille's reasons for staying on an Cape Town mayor.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Patricia de Lille's reasons for staying on an Cape Town mayor.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2K views24 pages

    Annexure A-G - 02.05.2018

    Uploaded by

    Charles Cilliers
    Patricia de Lille's reasons for staying on an Cape Town mayor.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 24
    MEDIA STATEMENT BY PATRICIA DE LILLE S APRIL 2018 A 1 INTRODUCTION For the last 7 months | have been subjected to a deluge of allegations by the Democratic Alliance, with new accusations surfacing from all quarters on aliost a daily basis. I took the principled decision to deal with these allegations head on in @ bid to clear my name. Considering that my name has been ‘smeared in public, it must be cleared in public. In the spit of transparency, 1 ish to provide clarity regarding the current status of the DA's disciplinary cases and charges against me B. 2 WHERE ARE WE WITH THE PARTY'S DISCIPLINARY PROCESSES? Itis neoessary to briefly recap the background: 21 Tho Party’s FedEx, In a resolution of June 2017, deciced to appoint the Steenhuisen Committee to resolve tensions inthe Farty’s ‘CoGT Caucus. That Committee however went beyond its mandate and deemed it appropriate to investigate me and in effect found me guy of certain things set out in a document which became known <¢ the “Steenhulson Report”. This report was adopted by FedEx on 10 Decomber 2017. | am challenging some of the findings in that report in Case No 797/18, which is pending before the High Cout and now scheduled for hearing on 2 May 2018, 22 After considering my representations regarding the report, FedEx resolved on 14 January 2018: “Not to support any motion of no confidence in the Mayor of Cape Town until the DA and City investigations have been concluded. 23 Despite this the DA Caucus, instructed bye the Faderal Exocutlve, later decided to first support the ANG a motion of no- confidence, which was withdrawn on 31 January 2018 and later t bring their own motion, on 15 February 2018, which felled. In that process took the Party to Court in Case No: 2153/18 to ensure secret vole, The Court found in my favour inthe senso tha ruled that the Speaker should decide the matter and not tho majority of the Councilors (as the Party wanted), The Court went further and ordered te Party fo pay some of my legal costs. Uimatoly the Speaker nied that the vote should be open, but the mation nevertheless failed. 24 In the meantime, FedX had reforred certain aspects of the Steeriuisen Report fo the FLC for disciplinary proceedings against ime. The referral was on 14 January 2018, with the instruction thet be “disposed of within 60 days, However, nothing much happened inthe fist 30 days. The reason for this can only be that the Party, including the FLC, was confident thet the motion of no confidence against me would succeed. Within hours after the mation of no canfdence fled, the disciplinary process was re-booted and the Party's FLC was again In contact with my egal representatives 2.8 The disciplinary process then became super urgent 3, Tis resuted in short notice ofthe fist dscipinary hearing, which is pert ‘ofthe reason why that hearing came unstuck on 22 March 2018. The Party's notice was approximately three workings days short af the five working days that clause 3 9 of the Party's Rules requites. This discipnary is chaired by MrHans-Jurie Moolman, a Councilor for the Paty in the JB Marks Municipality. The short netice was just one of the problems, The Mooknan Disciplinary Committee (DC) unraveled on day tree, when one of the pane! "members, Mr Pogiso Monchusi (Monchusi) “decided o recuse himself, nike ‘hat has been portrayed in the press, Mr Monchusi had no choice to recuse himself as some very damaging information regarding his fnese tobe apanel ‘member emerged during the course ofthe hearing. Basie checks woule have revealed that, given his situation, he should never have been asked to seve on aFLC panel 4. However, during the argument Mr Monchusimilitanlly defended Himself despite the overuhelming case made against him. However, at the end ofthe Breytenbach requested an adjournment for five minutes, which lasted for abcut % hearing, committee assistant [and FLC chaif] Ms Glynn hour. When the hearing recommenced Mr Monchusi suddenly announced that he wanted fo recuse himaai Hix sudden change of mind has never been explained. We stil await 2 response regarding the request forthe recusa of Ms Shella Camerer. 5. After MrMonchusi recused himself, there followed a diecussion by athe partes regarding some kind of arrangemants for the fuser conduct of proceedings. Itwas infer ala agreed thatthe pari wil endeavour to select a Gate forthe hearing which wil suit al the legal representatives. Iwas futher agreed that some procedural issues, such as socess to the hearing ty the Public / media, could be decided by the Chairperson before a new heating is convened 6. After this, and without mentioning 2 word about it during the hearing the FLC’s manager then handed my alomey a notice to allend «2 separate disciplinary hearing on Tuesday, 3 April 2018 in respect of totally ‘now charges, This was bizarre in ight of the fact that committee assistant Breyienbach had requested sn amendment to the charge sheet befowe the Moolman DG probably less than an hour eater 7. There was (end is) no reason why the new charges could not be added to the charge sheet in the Moolman DC. The Party does not have an appreciable or legitimate interestin running two separate disciplinary processes ‘against me. | have asked the Party to explain why itis doing this but it has refused to do s0. 1am saying that the only reason why the Pary is running ‘multiple processes against me isto harass and financially run me. 8. The second disciplinary process is chaired by Dr Len Joubert t commenced on Api 2018, This process concerns one single charge rlting to the manner in whien posts for area-based directors were advedived by the City, | deal with his below. The second dscipinary process has subsequently been postponed indefinitely because the Joubert Panel must now consider and ‘doce all the same issues which were already argued before the fist one, such 18 whether the hearing must be public ets. The Joubert Panel must also consider my argument thatthe Party is abusing their rights by unaing mute processes against me. WHAT DO | SAY ABOUT THE CHARGES? ) Bowmans 8. These charges are so named besause they relate to matters deing investigated forthe Ciy by Allomeys Bowman & Gillan, The background to these charges is the report compiled by the Executive Director in my office, MrCraig Kesson containing alisgetions ageinst the then City Manager (Mir Achmat Ebrahim) and the Commissioner for Transport, Ms Melissa Whitehead on 1 November 2017. Council authorised attomeys Bowman & Gilfitan to prepare a report on these allegations. 10. In the media it Is offen reported that | stand accused of covering up “corruption” perpetrated by City officials, more paticuarly Ms Whitehead. This is not the case +1, Tre Bowmane investigation, in respect of me, concerns the alagation that I supposedly exerted influence on the former Gty Manager notte refer allegations of misconduct against Whitehead to the Council. | di not do 50, But what ate the “alagatons of misconduct that had tobe referred? 12. The irtissueis thatthe City agreed with the supplier of Volve busses fo payforthe bus chassis before delivery af the busees. The early payment suited both parties. No law was contravened in ding so. No extra money was paid. Nether my lawyers nor me understand why this was wrong nor coud the Bowmans investigators explain this to us. Why i it wrong (not that | was Involved in this at a)? 13. The second issue concems a statement made by Ms Whitehead during the evaluation of bids for the Foreshore Freeway project to the effect that | would not approve the affordable housing to be situated under the foreshore bridges, This statement was made inthe context of a debate on the mest of developrnent options on which members of the committee has strong beliefs and it ended in a deadlock. The matter was resolved, ater receiving advice ‘rom senior counsel, and the evaluation commenced aftesh before @ new committee. Again, nether me nor my lawyers understand what the alogation of ‘misconduct i, 14, The debate about the so-caled Bowmans charges are realy about \hetherany allegation against a senior manager should be referred to Council regardiess of how ridiculous or plainly meritless the allegation is. As my lawyers have told the investigators, it appears tobe suggested that ever ifthe ‘allegation is that M's Whitehead stole the City’s sheep, the City Manager should have refered the charges to Council despite knowing that the City ons no sheep. That cannot be right and | received legal advice which supports ime, The allegations must at least make out a prima faci case of misconduct. 16. But as | stated above, i was in any event not my joo to refer the allegations against Ms Whitehead tothe Council, The formar City Manager has the legal duty to do so and I could not (and did not) stop him from doing $0, even though | have grave reservations about whether these allegations ajainst her reveal a prima facie case of misconduct. (i) Anthony Eau! 16. have submitted a full press release with annexures about this charge on 7 February 2018, which contains a full response. Basically, what happened is that 16.1 MrFaul and the company Auto Fire Off South Aftica (Pty) Ltd (AFO) held the rights to @ product known as the AFO Fire Bal, which is ‘an automatic fire extinguisher which Mr Faul claimed was ideally suited t0.curb the spread of fires in informal settlements, 16.2 On 14 November 2012, Mr Faul made a presentation to me and others regarting the product, including Alderman Smith JP and other Disaster Risk Management officials, His proposal was that he would raise the funding forthe fre balls but he needed a latter of support / Intent forthe project from the City, 16.3. It is in this context that 1 signed the lettor of intent dated 18 December 2012, which he drafted. The idea was thatthe City would ‘obtain 250 000 Fire Balls for free as Mr Faul would find the funding for the project. 164 Mr Faullater confirmed thatthe letter had been forwarded the funders and that they would decide on the rolLout ofthe programme. 18.5 However, by early January 2013 it transpired that Mr Faul ‘wanted the City to buy 1 000 Fire Balls from his company. 16.6 This made me furious as it seemed that the Cty had beentaken {or a ride and that Mr Faul never seriously intended to carry out the project on the baeis inlay proposed. The latter of endorsemert was. then withdrawn, 16.7 Itis a pty that this wel-ntentoned project was jetisoned. But needless to say, the allegation he makes that | ried lo make hin pay ‘me RS milion is ulfor nonsense, The correspondence shows that this could never have happened. How could | demand payment fom someone who was to fund his awn project? 168 Thore was no tender and AFO was never to be paid ty the ‘ty. The fact ofthe mattor is that | terminated this project when it became clear that hr Faul oid nat want to secure the funding forthe fre balsas initslly promised, but wanted the Cty to pay fr thom, 17. At the time that i made the press statement, I did not know that Mr Faul Js someone who was struck off the roll of attorneys, He has given come ‘muddled explanation for this but he was clearly guilty of misconduct 18, This moming | made enquiries at SAPS. It appears that they are stil \waiting for further information from Mr Fal 19, What is most worrying to me about this charge i that the Party laid @ complaint against me at the police and immeciately thereafter went on @ concerted campaign of disttibuting the details about the allegation © the media. It's an abuse ofthe criminal justice system to do this. twas also done shortly before the motion of no-confidence against me on Thursday, 18 February 2018, (Security measures 20, The second charge ralatoe to security measures at my house, which f have already dealt with on numerous occasions publicly 24. 1 am entied to an oficial residence but since | became Mayor in June 2011, thave refused! to take up this benef and continue to lve in my own house in Pinelands. | did not use City money to “renovale” my house there, After the renovations tha paid for, certain addtional securty upgrades had tobe effected du to the poston hold. These were tobe installed a City expense. They include two windows and two doors and upgrading cameras. | invited the mecia into my house inthe beginning ofthe year o show them what they ae, 22, The Auditor-General eventually found that the security measures should not have been done based on a 2014 SAPS report as it was outdated. Aso, a deviation from procurement procedures was approved to use the same supplier (Treldor) forthe security gates so as to match the existing gates. But none of this was my responsibilty to check. There are no allegations that | benefited Impropetly or anything ike that (jw) Thesms 23. 1am charged with sending an sms in 2016 asking a member of the panel responsible for evaluation candidates forthe postion of City Manager to score Mr Achmat Ebrahim high 24, I cannot find such a sms on my phone. My lauyers have repeatedly ‘asked the Party to produce the sms but nothing has been forthcoming, ” intent of Lit 25, 1 am charged with exerting Infuence regarding the appointment of Ms Essop to the Board ofthe Cape Town Stadium Municipal Ent, while being friends with her father 28, 1 was indeed in school with her father. Others involved in the appointment process also knows him, The fact of the matter is that | did not influence her appointment she was given @ chance, along with others to be interviewed. Others involved inthe process also added names of candidates that they wanted to be interviewed. At the interviews Ms Essop fared well enough to justify her appointment but was then removed ftom the lst of recommended candidates. With the coneurrence offegal, the ED: Finanoe and the Mayco member, she was then put back on the recommended list. w 6 5 area e 10 27, The single charge before the Joubert Pane! relates to the appointrent of area-based ditectors. It is suggested that | failed to ensure thet the ‘advertisement included a requirement that a minimum number of years! ‘experience is required for the job. Needless to say I have nothing to db with the compilation of advertisement for jobs. (In an independent investigation by the City of Cape Town Council, ithas since been found that therols no ‘evidence that | sought to influence the recruitment process). D. OPENHEARING 28. The Mooiman DC has already prepared a ruling on access tothe heating bythe public. A copy ofthat ruting is annexed hereto, On the issue of access to the hearing by the medis, no ruling has been prepared. On this ssve, Mediaz4 has made certain submissions for access contained in a leer tothe Moolman Panel 29, The same issue must also be considered by the Joubert Fane, 30, {relly fear a situation where these rings are being withheld or delayed unl shortly before the hearings are to recommence, which will make it impossible for me to review them in cour. This was conveyed to the two panels, 31. 1 read the ruling ofthe Moolman Panel on access to the hearings by the Public. My lawyers do not believe that any meaningful distinction can be érawn between the publ and the media when it comes to access to the heating. They say this because: 31.4 Inthe context of criminal trials, access by the public was always ‘a given but access by the media and television in particular remained a controversial unt the Oscar Pistorius trial and the adoption of “open Justice” as the default postion in such trials. 31.2 Nowadays it can never be contended that public or the media can totaly prohibited ftom access to criminal tals. Reasonable Conditions may however be imposed as is clear from the Van ‘Breda judgment by the Supreme Court of Appeal 31.3. The principles developed for criminal trials should also apply in dlscipinary hearings, 31.4 Inthe present instance, one can imagine tha the Panel may be Cconcemed about my supporters or opponents disrupting the proceedings. Such a situation can however easily be avoided by way ofthe imposition of conditions to prevent same, such as limiting the ‘number af supporters that may be present. 31.5 The bottom line is that a member ofthe pubic is entitled to see {or him- or herself whether the proceedings are fairand should not have toely on images or impressions by members of the media who attend 31.6 also need certain people to attend who have knowledge of the ‘matters raised in the cherges in order to assist me and my legal representatives to cross-examine witnesses or present my version of the everts. 32, Wis further difleult to understand why the Party wants to keep the proceedings secret. Others have agreed with me. See, in this regard, the Cditorial opinion expressed in the Cape Argus entitled “What's the DA hiding?” hitos:Jww ioLco zaleapearquslopiniontwhat.does-the-de-nave-to- 2 hide-by-making deiles-hearing-prvate-13926411, The Party's argument thatit ‘wants to prevent “grandstanding by the accused and witnesses alike is called ‘a lame excuse’, The editor corectly questions why the DA sees fit to conduct its business inthe dark 33. Similar views have been expressed by other _ leading commentators. Martin Welz of Nasewook stated the folowing ina tweet dated 18 March 2018: "DA Federal cher James Sole says clscplinary hearing of C Town Mayor Patcia de Lille for ‘misconduct’ — contravening the Party's onsitution — fs quite clearly an intemal matter. of no interes othe general public. Surely he has to know how absurd thet statement ist 34. Dario Mile, a leading media lawyer, responded: “/ agree ~ there is a strong case in view for hoaring to be open to media: fis, elegaions ae in the public domain; second, De Lille (who has the privacy interest here) wants the hearing in publi; tied, pubis intrest.” 35. Itean never be contended that this particular hearing conoems purely internal Party matters, as Mr Selfe seems to suggest. | face possible expulsion anc may accordingly lose my position as the Executive Mayor of Cape Town. It is accordingly undoubtedly in the public intrest for the hearing to be open because: 35.1 Firstly, those people who voted for the DA because | was the ‘mayoral candidate have a right to know why the Party now wants to remove her as Mayor. 352. Secondly, | have every right to insist on a public hearing in an attempt f restore the damage to my reputation and to ensure that the process is not only fair but that itis also seen to be fair by the a public. The Party does not have the privacy interest here, as Nr Milo pointed out. its me who is being accused of misconduct and itis my Interests that should weigh and not te ilkdefined interests ofthe Party to secrecy. 35.3 Thirdly, Mr Selfe, who appears to be the spokesperson of the Party on my matter, has not accurately reported to the medie what happens in the OC proceedings. The situation is best addressed regarding the recusal pplication of Me Sheila Camerer. tt was contended on my behalf atthe hearing that Ms Camerer and me have been lifelong political opponents. This is so in the first instance because Ms Camerer was the Deputy Minister of Justioe during pariheis times whist | was a leader inthe iberation movement. But Mr Selfe. has over and over ‘vied to misrepresent the position by claiming that Ms Camerer vias appointed 2s Depuly Minister of Justice by former President Mandela, even suggestingthat | have a problem wituhe uth. This is dospite the fact thet al the websites indicate that Ms Camerer was @ Deputy Minister of Justice inthe aparteld tira, At the hearing, Ms Gamerer indeed immediately conceded that she was @ Deputy Minister of Justice during Apartheid and indeed added something tothe effet that ‘everyone knows this’ Its clear thatthe public cannot rely on the Party to convey what is happening atthe hearing. This makes imperative that the hearing be open tothe pubic ‘and the media so that the proceedings can be accurately reported, 35.4 Fourthly, the allegations are in any event in the public demain and any confidentially which may have existed has long disappeared, primarily because my poitical opponents enthusiastically lak dotals of any charges, however ridiculous they may be. 36. For these reasons, | will continue to fight for an open hesring ever if this ‘means that | have to return to the Courts. Cily Successes 1. Four consecutive clean audits - no other City in SA has achieved this 2, Fist Green bond in SA . 21+ globally for foreign direct investment strategy by FD! Intelligence - Financtal Times |. Women for Change programme 5. Women at Work (TCT) - all women road repair teams . Cling retrofitting project ~ redress - 8 000 homes completed 7. Redress: Road upgrades (Macassar etc) Inclusive City: Extensive sheet renaming (Biko, Sobukwe, Jakes Gerwel ‘and seven footbridges 9. Small scale embedded generation (fist City in $A) 10.Land restitution - Constantia, Simons Town, Lotus River, Somerset West, Richmond and many others 11.100 Strategic Framework to reverse apartheid spatial planning- Won Intemational award in Canada in 2016 12.World Design Capital 2014 13. Mayoral Awards -to recognise staff and show recognition 14.Substance Abuse Campaign ~ fo address scourge of drug and alcohol ebuse 15.Inner City Affordable Housing: Salt River and Woodstock 16. Air Access leam ~ established two years ago —led to To new direct routes and 111 route expansions. More than 700 000 inbound seats to Cape Town. 17.Mayor’s one stop shop & Invest Cape Town 18.Credit rating - highest for a metro 19. Atlantis incentives to encourage business fo revive areas and crecte Jobs 20.Languyna business file deeds and more than 12.009 tile deeds isssed so fer 21.MyCiT free rides for job s¢ 22.Electric buses 23,N2 Express ~ MYC fo Khayelisha and Mitchells Plain 24, Business aining al UCT for former taxi owners now running the Veticle Operating Companies (R4Omilion invested in fraining) 25. Wit and broadband roll out (more than 300 will spots and more than £800km of fibre installed) 26.Inclusive City campaign - don't let ractsts speak for you 27. Expansion and success of CTICC 28. Astro turfs ~ developing facilis in poorer communities 29.Four got academies 30.Home based care for senior citizens 31. Fist Thursdays and Emerging Artists Programme 32. Janitorial programme - only Cy in Aiea fo have one 33. Freedom of the Cily: Kothrada, Ndungane 34.Fist Agreements with Afican cies and other global cities 36.Beach campaign - beach safety and keeping beaches clean 36. Youthstart - platform for young entropy the next level. 37.Blikkiesdorp resident's skils training at FET college, they will be employed of build their own houses. urs fo fake thelr businesses to bssecen Mother’s Day Home | ausiness, | srexr, Poimics’ | BRICS community | ures-vie tog IN REGISTER SCENT MAY 4, 2008 | NDIA AND CHINA HOW NOTTO ACHIEVE eae, ‘PUL walk away’ once name cleared: De Lille Fro Patricia de Lille '5Y DONWALD PRESSLY APRIL 20, Patricia de Lille says that she will walk away from the Democratic Alliance - but only once she has. cleared her name, At the weekend national leader Mmusi Maimane sald the matter of Brit 7 removing De Lille as Mayor of Cape Town had dragged on for too long and the DA had taken charge of the process now the The De Lille matter appears to be headed to court, ie har but if she wins the legal oattle she has promised that rop saane "wa nay one rane ca Ds eT Messgee she will be walking away from the DA. De Lille has told a national radio station that “t is not about hanging on. | am serving there at the behest of the DA, The DA has gone through a process... am representing the DA. Where we differ is the journey and the process.” De Lille has been charged by the DA itself of bringing, the party into disrepute, Last Wednesday, the Democratic Alliance city of Cape Town caucus passed ‘a motion of no confidence against her. This was an internal vote, carried by 97 votes to 41 She told the radio station that once she had cleared her name: “| will walk away." This implied that she recognised that the vote of no confidence stripped away the DA's requirement for administrative and natural justice tests. But she still insisted that she wanted to test the party's allegations against her. It implied too that she would not step down before a hearing was held by the Democratic Alliance. ‘Asked why she was continuing to fight her removal, De Lille said that although she was tired, she valued the flood of support she had got both nationally and internationally ll she wanted to dowas clearer sop aa ax name. De Lille - who confirmed she was still mayor - has Mas until Wednesday, May 2, to submit representations sma as to why she should nct be removed as Mayor of Fito Cape Town. DA Federal Executive chairperson James ue Selfe said she had notyatmaderepresentatons.De «= MASSMART fe Lille said DA leader Mmusi Maimane had stated that Wat she was running away from accountability. "| am not mar running away from acccuntability,” she told 2 local retreat : newspaper Weave ust celebrated Freedom Dey Seay 21g yet ‘Walmart, the world's Instead she accused the party of avoiding largest retailer by sales, s accountability procedures ~by passing vote of no infull. confidence while she wes facing a disciplinary aww ‘Ya eon ae clae Ds ale Th Marg hearing. "They have to wait for the disciplinary hearing to unfold before the motion of no confidence." Selfe said that the “recall clause” recently passed by the party's federal congress - allowed the party to hold office bearers to account. He was reported as saying that the clause tad been used already against the mayor of Matzikamma municipality. When it was suggested to De Lille that the vote of no confidence was a done deal - and effectively she was at the end of the political road with the DA now, she said she was stil determined to test her rights. "My feelings should not cloud the right of any person to natural justice,” When the example of former President Jacob Zuma having the right to fire former Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan was cited as similar to the action the DA was taking against her, she insisted her case would Provide “a good test case .. especially if you say all of those laws (administrative and natural justice) could ‘not come to my rescue. She continued: “If there are different Intepretations of the law, you go to the court and determine the right interpretation. That is the risk | am prepared to take.” Pressed on what her future would be when she walked away, De Lille said: "I must plan my future.” However, she laughed at speculation that she would join the Economic Freedom Fighters or the African "National Congress, She joked that when she had greeted President Cyril Ramaphosa a few weeks ago, this had fueled speculaton that she would cross over to the ANC. "Whether Igo into civil society... | can‘t go with this cloud over my head (ifshe does not clear her name first)” DA leader Mmusi Maimane told EWN that the matter hhad dragged on for too long. He said the party's leadership had informed the DA caucus in Cape Town that itis taking control of the De Lille issue. “The pstmentemscansgkt20'804N0Wmsrcecan.chd s upset April 27, 2018 Seven municipal by- elections were held last Wednesday. Apart from yj DA cus vote sDe ue - 25, 2018 ‘The Democratic Alliance City of Cape Town 154- member caucus has.. Ram aph osa ds to ste Pic ™ rot ‘April 30, 2018 Client confidentiality is the convenient excuse which the African National. Dare South Africans dream again? April 26, 2018 ‘twas just four and a half ‘months ago that. matter has dragged or for too long. We are taking complete control of the situation.” wae, Lee 8 ange He said that De Lille’s edmission that she would walk away made it clear “they never wanted to cooperate with the organisation’. She was simply evading accountability. RANDOM a Become allN Health Jewish residents told: Gran Coach Stay away Sant ENERS suSINE POLITIC BUSINE rounc gy ay ay | ep io mun i oe sy AD AD cuMo. NATAS.PRESSL PRESSL UR mY * om 7 AZO Ris TL On NF all walk Death Go, fake, away’, Nom-Nom Restaurant Britishimperialism —Ihit? go’ says’ once. where ‘wants Cyr hhané Koko. Iqbal name is thy Ramaphosa' says... repo ddoure sting? d: De 1 emo ena one tile n Ger Bsns ev € Previous post Next post > (ON “TLL WALK AWAY’ ONCE NAME CLEARED: DE LILLE" Neonat tao TUK “s DA's Mazzone blames De Lille for Cape Town water crisis Te Ot asa ane ft rain cued Pan de Ubtatngnbat FAL GOVERAGE ‘tino Cape one mar Po oats Page ay nape a | ‘Ie sua papas JOMAREVESOURG ~The DAS Wess Marna hn acemed Pati de Le ot —— intngin or tes a Cape Twn mye zone sys the Mater iy under de Lis deep, ws nauceae in “ Cetra ath err ras rp tte Th pry he previous nas herasonlopverment one dss, | READ: Ir not a sangoma De Lill on fsture with DA, emcee ‘Sx om neal roman et cme uty nly bape preva te nae backp rt was eqaedby Cape Tom, bt Fh) ss ack dey te ly Fa cone ating sly nachna ste ave Been Soe The Tue Psa ‘ert posnble dear azrona at, “Wat m say thatthe OA goverment under th lagers of Pata dee cara alo exec ha dates propar mane when Sain wth waar ett ‘isnt ty of Cap towns aos comments snencom © Losin Oecamen + Beste sey tweet pen anccimiou alse arene saptowrae = Michael Waters oad ains « Cape Town, Western Cape « @ LUTE a UT Breach of 64240 ofthe MELA over the management of revenue from the My Citi bas reach of section 120 ofthe Municipal Systems Act, De Lille di not ble financial miscondoet of senior manager, Contravention of Regulation 27(2¥a) of the Municipal Supply Chain Management Regulations. De Lille Bi rated bid specifications fora teraer[MyCiti Bus] in a biased De Lille did not exersise oversight responsibility by ensuring the procurement prowess flows the Cy va and eae, Kind Regan K. Thembekile Makywetw a TENDERS FOR FRIENDS} Auditor-General South Aiea WATCH: DA gets another shot at De Lille no-confidence vote <8 yw eo ree

    You might also like