1|Page

AGENCY COURSE SYLLABUS with List of cases Quiroga vs Parsons Hardware, 38 Phil 501
Gonzalo Puyat & sons vs Arco Amusement Co., 72 Phil 402
I. Introduction Lim v People, 133 scra 333
Pacific Commercial vs Yatco, 68 Phil 398
Rallos vs Felix Go Chan, 81 Scra 251 Ker vs Lingad, 38 scra 524
Orient Air Services vs CA, 197 Scra 645 Hahn vs CA, 266 scra 537
Uy vs CA, 314 Scra 69
Macke vs Camps, 7 Phil. 553 V. What are the classifications of agency contracts
Prudential Bank vs CA, 223 Scra 350 Siasat vs IAC 139 scra 238
Litonjua Jr. vs Eternit Corp. 490 scra 204 Dominion Insurance vs CA, G.R. No. 129919, 6 February 2002
Philippine Realty and Holding Corp. vs. Ley Const. and Dev. Corp./Ley Cons. and PNB vs Sta. Maria 29 scra 303
Dev. Corp. vs. Philippine Realty and Holding Corp., G.R. No. 165548/G.R. No. BPI vs de coster 47 Phil 594
167879. June 13, 2011 (Doctrine of Apparent Authority) Hodges vs Salas 63 Phil 567
Strong vs Gutierrez Rupide 6 Phil 680
II. Form of the Contract of Agency Katigbak vs Tai Hung Co., 52 Phil 622
Angeles vs Phil. National Railways, 500 scra 444 (2006) Chua vs IAC, 229 scra 99
Jimenez vs Rabot, 38 Phil 378 Dungo vs Lopena, 6 scra 1007
City-Lite vs CA, 325 scra 385 Vicente vs Geraldez 52 scra 210
Cosmic Lumber vs CA, 265 scra 168 Insular Drug CO. vs National Bank 58 Phil 684
San Juan Structural Steel vs CA, 296 scra 631 Angeles V. Philippine National Railways August 31, 2006
Delos Reyes vs CA, 313 Scra 632 Megan Sugar Corporation v. Regional Trial Court of Iloilo, Br. 68, Dumangas,
AF Realty vs Dieselman Freight, 373 Scra 385 Iloilo; New Frontier Sugar Corp., et al., G.R. No. 170352. June 1, 2011 (Agency by
Estoppel)
III. Who has the obligation to determine the existence and scope of agency?
VI. What are the obligations and liabilities of agents to their principals?
Keeler Electric Co. vs Rodriguez, 44 Phil 19
Yu Eng Cho vs Pan American, 328 scra 717 Austria vs CA 39 scra 527
PNB vs Manila Surety 14 Scra 776
IV. How is agency distinguished from other contracts/relationships Domingo vs Domingo 42 scra 131
Severino vs Severino 44 Phil 343
Cases: Green Valley Poultry vs IAC, 133 Scra 697
Municipal Council of Iloilo vs Evangelista, 55 Phil 290
Sevilla vs CA, 160 scra 171
Shell vs Firemen’s Insurance Co., 100 Phi 757 VII. Responsibility for acts of substitutes
Dela Cruz vs Northern Theatrical Enterprises, 95 Phil 739
Nielson & Co. vs Lepanto Consolidated, 26 Scra 540 Cases: del Rosario vs La BAdenia, 33 Phil 316
2|Page

International Films vs Lyric Films 63 Phil 778

Barreto vs Sta. Maria 26 Phil 440
Dialosa vs CA, 130 Scra 350
VIII. What are the obligations and liabilities of agents to third parties? New Manila vs Republic, 107 Phil 824
Dy Buncio vs Ong Guan, 60 Phil 606
PNB vs Agudelo, 58 Phil 655 Garcia vs de Manzano, 39 Phil 577
Philippine Products vs Primateria, 15 scra 301 Rallos vs Yangco, 20 Phil 269
NPC vs National Merchandising, 117 scra 789 Compania General de Tobaccos vs Diabu 20 Phil 321
National Bank vs Welch Fairchild 44 Phil 780 Caleongco vs Claparols, 10 scra 577
Tuazon vs Orosco, 5 Phil 596
Cervantes vs CA, 304 Scra 25 B. Withdrawal

Agent acting in his own name Valera vs Velasco, 51 Phil 695

Smith Bell vs Sotelo 44 Phil 784 C. Death

Rural Bank of Bombon vs CA 212 Scra 25
Sy-juco vs Sy-juco 49 Phil 634 Pasno vs Ravina, 54 Phil 378
National Food Authority vs IAC 184 scra 166 Ramon vs Caoibes, 94 Phil 440
Gold Star Mining vs Lim Jimenez 25 scra 597 Herrera vs Luy Kim Guan, 1 scra 406

IX. What are the obligations and liabilities of principals to agents?

Macondray vs Sellner, 33 Phil 370

Danon vs Brim & Co. 42 Phil 133
Rocha vs Prats 43 Phil 397
Inland Realty vs CA 273 csra 70
Infante vs Cunanan 93 Phil 691
Prats vs CA 81 scra 360
Uniland Resources vs DBP 200 scra 75

X. What are the obligations of principals to third parties?

Gonzales vs Haberes 47 Phil 380

XI. How is agency extinguished?

A. Revocation
3|Page

TRUSTS
Course Syllabus

I. A. General – Articles 1440 to 1442

1. Salao vs. Salao, 70 SCRA 65 [1976]

2. De Leon vs. Molo-Peckson, 6 SCRA 978
3. Government vs. Abadilla, 46 Phil. 642
4. Cristobal vs. Gomez, 50 Phil. 810
5. Araneta vs. Perez, 5 SCRA 338
6. Mindanao Development Authority vs. Court of Appeals, 113 SCRA 429
7. Roa, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals, 123 SCRA 3 [1983] under Art. 1456
8. Perez vs. Araneta, 4 SCRA 430

II. Express Trust – Articles 1443 to 1446

1. Cuaycong vs. Cuaycong, 21 SCRA 1192

2. Sinaon vs. Soroñgon, 136 SCRA 407

III. Implied Trust – Articles 1447 to 1457

1. O’Laco vs. Co Cho Chit, 220 SCRA 656

2. Special Services Corporation vs. Centro La Paz, 121 SCRA 748
3. Chiao Liong Tan vs. Court of Appeals, 46 SCAD 435, 228 SCRA 75
4. Homena vs. Casa, 157 SCRA 232
5. Heirs of Candelaria vs. Romero, 109 Phil. 500