Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case II Final
Case II Final
(PETITIONER)
v.
(RESPONDENTS)
_________________________________________________________
SUBMITTED BY:-
DHARMVEER LALI
ROLL NO.15/15
LLB 6th Semester.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
B INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
C STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
D STATEMENT OF FACTS
E ISSUE RAISED
F SUMMARY OF PLEADINGS
G PLEADINGS ADVANCED
A. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
The present writ petition has been filed in the shape of Public Interest
Litigation. PIL means a legal action initiated in a Court of law for the
enforcement of public interest or general interest in which the public or
class of the community have pecuniary interest or some interest by
which their legal rights or liabilities area affected. PIL can be filed any
person acting bona fide and who has enough interest in instituting an
action for redressal of public injury or public wrong doing.
D. STATEMENT OF FACTS
3. The Rule of Law doesn’t mean that the protection of the law must
be available only to a fortunate few. The poor too have Civil &
Political Rights and the Rule of Law is meant for them also.
4. In the case of PUCL v. Union of India & Ors. the apex Court has
held that “courts are not meant only for the rich and the well-to-do,
for the landlord and the gentry, for the business magnate and the
industrial tycoon, but they exist also for the poor and the down-
trodden the have-nots and the handicapped and the half-hungry
millions of our countrymen. So far the courts have been used only
for the purpose of vindicating the rights of the wealthy and the
affluent. It is only these privileged classes which have been able to
approach the courts for protecting their vested interests. It is only
the moneyed who have so far had the golden key to unlock the
doors of justice. But, now for the first time the portals of the court
are being thrown open to the poor and the downtrodden, the
ignorant and the illiterate, and their cases are coming before the
courts through public interest litigation.”
5. No doubt, it is the construction workers whose rights have been
violated. But they have no source to approach the Court for
enforcement of their rights.
7. Children working there are minor and their voices are going
unheard. It becomes very difficult for these children to go to court
and fight for their rights. Thus in that case PIL seems to be an
effective weapon to fight for their rights and justice. (David
Feldman, “Public interest litigation and Constitutional theory in
Comparative Perspective.” The Modern Law Review 55 (1), 44
(1992).)
16. Article 39 (e) of the Constitution provides that the State shall
secure that the health and strength of workers, men and women,
and the tender age of children are not abused and that citizens are
not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations unsuited to
their age or strength.
17. In the case of Maneka Gandhi v. UOI it was held that these
Fundamental Rights (here referred to as Article 21) represent the
basic values cherished by the people of this country since the
Vedic times and they are calculated to protect the dignity of the
individual and create conditions in which every human being can
develop his personality to the fullest extent. They weave a "pattern
of guarantees on the basic-structure of human rights" and impose
negative obligations on the State not to encroach on individual
liberty in its various dimensions. page no.23
20. In the case of Delhi Council for Child Welfare v. Sheela Devi
and Another, it was held that the provisions of the Minimum Wages
Act, 1948 are applicable to persons who work in mines or on
construction sites, contract labour, and persons working in
agriculture operations, on daily wages.
21. As the workers are not being paid minimum wages it is clear
violation of Article 21 as enumerated supra. They are also
compelled to work on all days which is also against the principles
of Minimum Wages Act.
26. Article 23 doesn’t only prohibit begar, but it also prohibits any
other similar forms of forced labour. In the case of Menaka Gandhi
v. Union of India it was held that when interpreting the provisions
of the Constitution conferring Fundamental Rights, the attempt of
the Court should be to expand the reach and ambit of the
Fundamental Rights rather than to attenuate their scope. As such
scope of the term "any other similar forms of forced labour" is very
vast.
29. Further, there are children below 14 years of age are working
at the construction site which is against the Article 24 of the Indian
Constitution and Section 3 of the Child Labour (Prohibition &
Regulation) Act, 1986 as amended by Child Labour (Prohibition &
Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016
32. Article 15(3) of the Constitution has provided the State with
the power to make special provisions for women and children
36. Children are the future assets of the nation. They must be
allowed to enjoy their fundamental freedoms in the childhood days,
since childhood comes only once in their lifetime. Unfortunately,
the contractor is exploiting them in so many ways as they are
highly vulnerable and their growth, health; physical and mental
wellbeing is being disturbed. They are deprived of their childhood
rights like education, health, nutrition, privacy and personality
development. Moreover, in such circumstances children may be
subjected to sexual abuse.
40. In Mackinnon Mackenzie & Co. Ltd vs Audrey D'Costa & Anr
it was held that the applicability of this Act does not depend upon
financial ability of the employer to pay equal remuneration. AIR
1987 SC 1281(1289)
41. Article 39 (d) of the DPSP's provides that the State shall
ensure that that there is equal pay for equal work for both men and
women. However, the same is not being paid, though; they are
discharging similar duties carrying equal physical effort and
responsibility.
42. The non compliance of the provisions of the Interstate
Migrant Workmen (Regulations of Employment and Conditions of
Service) Act 1979 is violation of Article 21. It is applicable to any
establishment who hires more than five-inter State migrant
workers. The act provides for equality on the basis of payment of
wages, wage rates, holidays, hours of work, and other conditions
of service (non-discriminatory towards inter-state migrants
workers). Wages paid to the inter-state workmen should comply
with the minimum wages legislation. This act also provides for
displacement allowance and journey allowance. Overall, the
contractor has the primary responsibility for: registering the worker,
issuance of passbooks, regular payment of wages, equal
remuneration to men and women, ensure suitable condition for
work, provide suitable residential arrangement, provide medical
facility, provide clothing, in case of serious injury to the worker
inform the next to kin and the state authorities.
45. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar at the birth of the Indian Constitution said
that by independence we have lost the excuse of blaming the
British for anything going wrong. If hereafter things go wrong, we
will have nobody to blame except ourselves. It implies to put forth
to put forth the goal of building a new India on the lines of the
ideals and goals embodied in the Constitution - created by her own
people and representing the masses; adopted to secure the ideals
of social justice, equality, and equity. Quoted from Granville Austin, The Indian
Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999) at 308
48. It is undisputed that the work for the construction was initially
given by the State Government. As such the Government cannot
run from its liability for observance of the various labour laws as it
is the Government who has entrusted the work of construction to
the contractor.
50. Not only it is the duty of the State Government to ensure the
protection of Fundamental Rights of the people but also it is their
moral and constitutional obligation. However, the State
Government is not taking necessary steps to ensure the same at
the construction site.