•

•
•
•
•
•
•

2
•
•
•
•

3
4
Bailey, L., et al. (1991, October). Causes, Detection and Prevention. Oilfield Review, 13-26 5
Zoback, M. (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 6
Zoback, M. (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7
Bailey, L., et al. (1991, October). Causes, Detection and Prevention. Oilfield Review, 13-26 8
 •
•

Alkamil, E. H. K., Abbood, H. R., Flori, R. E., & Eckert, A. (2018). Case study of wellbore stability evaluation for the Mishrif Formation, Iraq. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 164, 663–674. 9
𝜎1 = 𝑞𝜎3 + 𝐶0

𝜏𝑜𝑐𝑡 = 𝑘 + 𝑚𝜎𝑜𝑐𝑡

(𝐼1′ )3
′ = 27 + η
𝐼3

10
 𝜎𝑣

Alkamil, E. H. K., Abbood, H. R., Flori, R. E., & Eckert, A. (2018). Case study of wellbore stability evaluation for the Mishrif Formation, Iraq. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 164, 663–674. 11
 𝜎ℎ

Zoback, M. (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 12

 𝜎𝐻 = 3𝜎ℎ − 𝐹𝐵𝑃 + 𝑇0 − 𝑃𝑝

𝜎𝐻 3𝜎ℎ − 𝜎𝐻 − 𝑃𝑝 − 𝑃𝑖 > −𝑇0

1 1 + sen 𝜙
𝜎𝐻 ≥ 𝑈𝐶𝑆 + (𝑃𝑖 − 𝑃𝑝 )
3 1 − sen 𝜙

13
𝜐 = 0,25

14
 𝜙

𝐺𝑅 − 𝐺𝑅𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝐺𝑎𝑚𝑚𝑎 𝑅𝑎𝑦

𝑉𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑒 =
𝐺𝑅𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝐺𝑅𝑚𝑖𝑛 𝑁𝑃𝐻𝐼

𝜙 = 26,5 − 37,4 1 − 𝑁𝑃𝐻𝐼 − 𝑉𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑒 + 62,1(1 − 𝑁𝑃𝐻𝐼 − 𝑉𝑠ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑒 )2

15
𝑈𝐶𝑆 = 143,8 𝑒 −6,95Φ = 2𝑆0 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜙
1−𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜙 Porosidad (Φ)

𝑈𝐶𝑆(1 − 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜙)
𝑆0 =
2 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜙

𝑆0 Cohesión de la roca

16
17
 𝜏0

𝐹𝐵𝑃
𝐹𝐶𝑃

𝜏0 = 𝐹𝐵𝑃 − 𝐹𝐶𝑃 ≈ 𝐹𝐵𝑃 − 𝐼𝑆𝐼𝑃

𝜏0 = 8 𝑀𝑃𝑎

18
 𝜎𝑣

ℎ
𝜎𝑣 = න 𝜌𝑔 𝑑ℎ
0

𝜎𝑣
𝜎𝑣

Alkamil, E. H. K., Abbood, H. R., Flori, R. E., & Eckert, A. (2018). Case study of wellbore stability evaluation for the Mishrif Formation, Iraq. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 164, 663–674. 19
 𝜎ℎ

𝐼𝑆𝐼𝑃

𝜎ℎ 𝜎ℎ
𝐹𝐶𝑃

Zoback, M. (2007). Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 20

 𝜎𝐻

𝜎𝐻 = 3𝜎ℎ − 𝐹𝐵𝑃 + 𝑇0 − 𝑃𝑝

𝜎𝐻 3𝜎ℎ − 𝜎𝐻 − 𝑃𝑝 − 𝑃𝑖 > −𝑇0

1 1 + sen 𝜙
𝜎𝐻 ≥ 𝑈𝐶𝑆 + (𝑃𝑖 − 𝑃𝑝 )
3 1 − sen 𝜙

21
 𝜎𝐻

𝜎𝐻 = 3𝜎ℎ − 𝐹𝐵𝑃 + 𝑇0 − 𝑃𝑝 = 43[MPa]

𝜎𝐻 3𝜎ℎ − 𝜎𝐻 − 𝑃𝑝 − 𝑃𝑖 > −𝑇0
1 1 + sen 𝜙
𝜎𝐻 ≥ 𝑈𝐶𝑆 + (𝑃𝑖 − 𝑃𝑝 )
3 1 − sen 𝜙

22
 𝜎𝐻

𝜎𝐻 = 3𝜎ℎ − 𝐹𝐵𝑃 + 𝑇0 − 𝑃𝑝

𝜎𝐻 3𝜎ℎ − 𝜎𝐻 − 𝑃𝑝 − 𝑃𝑖 > −𝑇0

1 1 + sen 𝜙
𝜎𝐻 > 46 [𝑀𝑃𝑎]
𝜎𝐻 ≥ 𝑈𝐶𝑆 + (𝑃𝑖 − 𝑃𝑝 )
3 1 − sen 𝜙

23
 𝜎𝐻

𝜎𝐻 = 3𝜎ℎ − 𝐹𝐵𝑃 + 𝑇0 − 𝑃𝑝

𝜎𝐻 3𝜎ℎ − 𝜎𝐻 − 𝑃𝑝 − 𝑃𝑖 > −𝑇0

1 1+sen 𝜙
𝜎𝐻 ≥ 𝑈𝐶𝑆 + (𝑃𝑖 − 𝑃𝑝 ) 𝜎𝐻 ≥ 53[𝑀𝑃𝑎]
3 1−sen 𝜙

24
 𝜎𝐻

𝜎𝐻 = 3𝜎ℎ − 𝐹𝐵𝑃 + 𝑇0 − 𝑃𝑝 𝜎𝐻 = 43 [MPa]

𝜎𝐻 3𝜎ℎ − 𝜎𝐻 − 𝑃𝑝 − 𝑃𝑖 > −𝑇0 𝜎𝐻 > 46 [𝑀𝑃𝑎]

1 1 + sen 𝜙
𝜎𝐻 ≥ 𝑈𝐶𝑆 + (𝑃𝑖 − 𝑃𝑝 ) 𝜎𝐻 ≥ 53 [𝑀𝑃𝑎]
3 1 − sen 𝜙

25
 𝜎𝐻

𝜎𝐻 = 3𝜎ℎ − 𝐹𝐵𝑃 + 𝑇0 − 𝑃𝑝 𝜎𝐻 = 43 [MPa]

𝜎𝐻 3𝜎ℎ − 𝜎𝐻 − 𝑃𝑝 − 𝑃𝑖 > −𝑇0 𝜎𝐻 > 46 [𝑀𝑃𝑎]

1 1 + sen 𝜙
𝜎𝐻 ≥ 𝑈𝐶𝑆 + (𝑃𝑖 − 𝑃𝑝 )
3 1 − sen 𝜙 𝜎𝐻 ≥ 53 [𝑀𝑃𝑎]

26
27
𝜎𝐻 𝜎ℎ

28