You are on page 1of 1

Analytical Exposition

Should smoking be banned in public area? Why?

Introduction (thesis argument) : smoking is can activity that is very dangerous for both the smoker and
the the people around him. In my opinion smokingis also habit that is wrong and not suitable to do.
Although smoking is not banned by our country, smoking is very havinful, because with smoking will
lead to heart attacks, cancer, ahortness of breath, felal disordes, bronchitis, cough, etc.

Conclusion : Based on the above discussion we can conclude that smoking is very dangerous for
smoker and people around it. So it is not wrong if smoking bans in public places made in an attempt
to create clean air as well as a from of homage for thise who are not smokers.

Argument 1 + elaboration : First of all, I could lake to point out that smoking very dangerous for both
the smoker and the people around him. I want to show that smoking is very dangerous for smoker
and people around it. Besides smoking is also very dangerous for survival, because it will lead to death.
Therefore we avoid smoking as much as possible, because cigarettes there are 4000 dangerous toxins
in it.

1. Acrolein (contains alcohol)


2. Carbon monoxide (shortness of breath)
3. Nicotin, dll.

The greates can make people become addiction. The effect is caused by nicotine substance.

Argument 2 : Cigarettes proved to damage the healt of people who suck it other than that also the
person who accidentally inhale the smoke

You might also like