1. [Feria v.

CA (2000)
2. [Cruz v. CA (2000)]
3. [Tijing v. CA]
4. [Ilusorio v. Bildner (2000)]
5. [Moncupa v. Enrile (1986)]
6. [Caunca v. Salazar]
7. [Olaguer v. Military Commission (1987)]
8. [Harden v. Director (1948)]
9. Galvez v. CA (1994)]
10. Chavez v. CA (1968)
11. Velasco vs. CA, GR 118644, July 7, 1995.
12. Dizon vs. Eduardo, 153 SCRA 470.
13. Elepante vs. Madayag, 196 SCRA 399.
14. A.M. No. 08-1-16-SC January 22, 2008
15. (A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC), on 25 September 2007
16. Castillo vs. Cruz, 605 SCRA 628,
17. Canlas vs. NAPICO Homeowners, 554 SCRA 208
18. Reyes vs. CA, 626 SCRA 580
19. Razo, Jr., vs. Tagitis, GR 182498, June 22, 2010,
20. Rep. Act No. 9048 removed from the ambit of Rule 108 of the Rules of Court the
correction of such errors. Rule 108 now applies only to substantial CHANGES
and corrections in entries in the civil register.
21. Under Rep. Act No. 9048, a correction in the civil registry involving the CHANGE
(not correction) of sex is not a mere clerical or typographical error. It is a
substantial change for which the applicable procedure is Rule 108 of the Rules of
Court.
22. Republic vs. Jennifer Cagandahan, GR 166676, September 12, 2008.
23. Republic v. Valencia (G.R. No. L-32181 March 5, 1986)
24. Republic vs. Lim, [G.R. No. 153883. January 13, 2004]
25. Parco vs. CA
26. Paciente v. Dacuycuy
27. Gachitorena v. Sotelo
28. Yangco vs. CFI of Manila
29. Francisco vs. CA
30. Guerrero v. Teran
31. Araneta v. Perez (1962)
32. Tiangco v. Francisco (Trustee)
33. De Leon v. Molo-Peckson (1962) (Trustee)
34. Palma v. Cristobal (Trustee)
35. Salinas v. Tuazon (Trustee)
36. Hernandez v. San Juan-Santos, G.R. No. 166470, August 7, 2009, 595 SCRA
464. (Guardianship)
37. Francisco v. Court of Appeals, G.R. 57438, January 31, 1984, 127 SCRA 371.
(Guardianship)
38. People v. Watiwat, G.R. No. 139400, September 3, 2003, 410 SCRA 324.
(Guardianship)
39. Gorostiaga v. Sarte, 68 Phil. 4 (1939). (Guardianship)
40. Uy v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 109557, November 29, 2000, 346 SCRA
247(Guardianship)
41. Catalan et. al., v. Basa, G.R. No. 159567, July 31, 2007, 528 SCRA 645.
(Guardianship)
42. Francisco v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 57438, January 3, 1984, 127 SCRA 371
(Guardianship)
43. Vancil v. Belmes, G.R. No. 132233, June 19, 2001, 358 SCRA 707
(Guardianship)
44. Gonzales v. Aguinaldo, G.R. No. 74769, September 28, 1990, 190 SCRA 112
(Guardianship)
45. In the matter of the guardianship of Carmen Padilla Vda. De Bengson v.
Philippine National Bank, G.R. No. 17066, December 28, 1961, 3 SCRA 751.
(Guardianship)
46. Sikat v. Vda. De Villanueva, 57 Phil. 486 (1932). (Statute of Non-Claims)
47. Sanchez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108947, September 29, 1997, 279 SCRA
647 (Inventory)
48. Heirs of Pedro Escanlar v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 119777, October 23, 1997,
281 SCRA 176. (Sale of Estate)
49. Orola v. Pontevedra, G.R. No.158566, September 20, 2005, 470 SCRA 352.
(Mortage of Estate)
50. In the matter of escheat proceedings of the estate of the deceased Anne Fallon
Murphy and Tomas Fallon married to Julia Fallon v. Bezore, et al., G.R. No. L-
14157, October 26, 1960 Escheat
51. Republic of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals and Maximo Wong, G.R. No.
97906, May 21, 1992, 209 SCRA 189. Adoption
52. In the Matter of Adoption of Stephanie Nathy Astorga, G.R. No. 148311, March
31, 2005, 454 SCRA 541. Adoption
53. Lahom v. Sibulo, G.R. No.143989, July 14, 2003, 406 SCRA 135. Adoption
54. Landingin v. Republic, G.R. No. 164948, June 27, 2006, 493 SCRA 415.
Adoption