Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MAINSTREAMING DISABILITY
based on the Social Economy example
I. Foreword...................................................................................................... 3
II. Introduction................................................................................................. 5
3.1. Employment............................................................................................ 7
3.2. Education and training..........................................................................18
3.3. Goods and services............................................................................. 23
3.4. Health care........................................................................................... 27
3.5. Leisure activities................................................................................... 30
3.6. Financial services and funding............................................................. 33
3.7. Housing................................................................................................ 38
3.8. Horizontal issues.................................................................................. 42
IV. Conclusions............................................................................................... 46
For the past few years, the European Standing Conference of Co-operatives, Mutual
Societies, Associations and Foundations ( CEP-CMAF ), through its group on disability issues,
has promoted the inclusion of the disability perspective in Social Economy enterprises and
organisations at all levels of their work.
As a part of this work, and as a small contribution to the 2007 European Year of Equal
Opportunities for All, we have decided to create this guide to share our expertise in the
field. We have tried to develop a practical tool that can be useful for any type of enterprise.
Although the cases selected to illustrate the guidelines provided are from the Social Economy
sector, the proposals included can be followed by any type of enterprise, regardless of the
sector they operate in.
Disability can be horizontalised in any organisation, structure, policy, or activity undertaken
by public or private actors, active or not in the disability field. Often these actors overlook how
simple measures can improve the quality of life of persons with disabilities, or they are just
not aware of the various ways their actions can impact on disabled people. For them, we have
collected illustrative examples and simple guidelines that will help them to easily include a
disability perspective in their work.
With the aim of ensuring maximum accuracy and usefulness of this guide, we have benefited from
the invaluable cooperation of the European Disability Forum (EDF) and have involved a number of
experts from the various Social Economy families .
(Co-operatives, Mutual Societies, Associations and Foundations). All of this cooperation has been
efficiently coordinated by Marta Hernández and Ana Mohedano of the European Foundation
Centre (EFC). I would like to thank them all for their efforts to make this project a reality.
I would also like to thank all the organisations, institutions and individuals that contributed
to this publication after the presentation of its preliminary version at the Seminar on Social
Economy and Equal Opportunities held at the EU Economic and Social Committee (EESC) on
April 17th 2007, which was organised by the CEP-CMAF and the EDF.
Nevertheless, this Guide is not an end in itself, but just one more step forward on the long
road to full integration of persons with disabilities into society, and, we, as CEP-CMAF, are
committed to continuing to promote the active contribution of Social Economy enterprises to
this integration.
This guide, drafted in cooperation with and equal opportunities, with a particular
the European Disability Forum ( EDF ), is focus on disability.
one of several initiatives undertaken by the
With the presentation of the publication
Disability Working Group of the European
at the event a broad consultation process
Standing Conference of Co-operatives,
was launched in which interested parties
Mutual Societies, Associations and
were invited to read the guide carefully and
Foundations ( CEP-CMAF ) aimed at raising
provide their comments and opinion on the
awareness and promoting the integration of
practical tips and ideas outlined as well as
people with disabilities and disability issues
further case study examples that could be
in society as a whole and in Social Economy used to illustrate these practical guidelines.
enterprises and organisations in particular.
Mindful of the complexity of the disability
The guide is published within the framework field and given that people with disabilities
of the 2007 European Year of Equal are not a homogeneous group, we
Opportunities for All ( EYEO ) in order to believe that this consultation of relevant
take full advantage of the opportunities stakeholders, in particular people
that the Year offers to raise awareness and with disabilities and the organisations
give visibility to these issues. However, its representing them, was essential to ensure
relevance and use will extend beyond the the maximum added value of this guide.
European Year.
We are aware that there is still room for
Drafting methodology further development of this publication, of its
contents and examples, in order to make it a
The content of this guide is based on comprehensive tool. This is why we consider
the information and expertise provided this publication to be a first step that we
and gathered by members of the CEP- hope serves to raise awareness on the issue,
CMAF Disability Working Group and the encourage reflection and set up the basis for
EDF through consultation with the CEP- further action.
CMAF and EDF member organisations
and partners, as well as other relevant Aim of the Guide
stakeholders in the field.
This guide has been produced with a
The preliminary version of this publication threefold objective in mind :
was presented at the European Seminar on
Social Economy and Equal Opportunities, • To provide practical guidelines and
which was held on April 17th 2007 at the illustrative case study examples of how
European Economic and Social Committee organisations, regardless of whether
( EESC ) in Brussels ( Belgium ), in order to they work directly in the disability
solicit participant opinion and feedback. field or not, can integrate people with
disabilities and disability issues into their
This one-day event, jointly organised by the
organisations and activities. This action
CEP-CMAF and the EDF, with the support
will hereafter be referred to as ‘disability
of the EESC Social Economy Category,
mainstreaming’ ;
brought together representatives from
Social Economy organisations, European • To present examples of Social Economy
institutions and other key public and private enterprises and organisations, as well as
stakeholders to explore the current and partnerships between these organisations
potential role of Social Economy and its and other stakeholders, which are already
partners in the areas of non-discrimination promoting this approach ; and
are particularly active in the fields of The Social Economy’s efforts against
social protection, social services, health, discrimination
banking, insurance, agriculture, consumer
Social Economy, founded on the principles
organisations, handicrafts, housing, supply,
of solidarity and individual involvement in
neighbourhood services, education and
a process of active citizenship, is already
training, culture, sport, and leisure activities.
contributing to creating a diverse society
Social Economy represents 10 % of all that includes all persons, and in particular
European businesses, a percentage the most vulnerable such as those with
amounting to around two million businesses. disabilities.
They employ more than nine million workers,
It is doing so by developing and supporting
that is to say, they are responsible for
activities that directly address this group,
creating 10 % of all jobs in Europe. For
e.g. through employment and training
example in France, 760,000 Social Economy
opportunities, provision of goods and
businesses employ almost two million
services, legal support, defence of rights,
remunerated employees ; in Spain, they
etc. Nevertheless, it is also contributing
make up 5 % of the GDP ( Gross Domestic
by taking into account the needs and
Product ) and 10 % of employment, which is
requirements of people with disabilities in
about 1.2 million people ; and in Belgium, the
relation to other initiatives it may develop,
sector represents 13.37 % of jobs in more
even if these initiatives do not directly target
than 17,000 businesses, making up 5 % of
people with disabilities e.g. banking, culture,
the GDP.
provision of goods and services.
The European Standing Conference of Co-
It is also important to highlight that given
operatives, Mutual Societies, Associations
that Social Economy organisations are active
and Foundations ( CEP-CMAF ) represents
in all areas of society, they are in a perfect
key Social Economy organisations
position to promote full integration of people
at European level. The CEP-CMAF
with disabilities and disability issues in
represents co-operatives, mutual societies,
society as a whole.
associations, foundations, and various other
forms of enterprises that share the values
defined in the Social Economy Charter.
10
Ë Housing
11
Participation in employment is crucial not only adequate education and training, workplaces
for earning an income, but more importantly not adapted to the needs of people with
because it enables active participation in disabilities, employer and colleagues’
society.For people with disabilities, this is a prejudices and a lack of support and
challenge as they face significant barriers guidance for employers, disabled employees
with regard to both job seeking and and other staff members.
job retention. According to the European
Community Household Panel, a person within Some practical ideas to overcome
the active age range ( 16-64 years ) has a these challenges
66 % probability of finding a job or developing
A growing number of organisations are
a business. For a person with a moderate
realising that there are several ethical,
disability this probability falls to 47 %, and for a
economic, legal and business reasons to
person with a severe disability the probability
address diversity and disability issues in their
is reduced to a mere 25 %. In addition,
activities and are choosing to adopt strategies
employment opportunities are even lower for in the area, in many cases incorporating them
certain groups of disabled people, for example into their global diversity strategies. Benefits
women. The equivalent statistics are 44 % for include an improved corporate image and
females with a moderate disability and 25 % reputation ; enhanced employee recruitment
for those with a severe disability.In addition and retention, through access to a wider pool
to these worrying trends, a high proportion of highly skilled and motivated workers that
of disabled workers also belong to the low- otherwise would not be attracted ; creation
paid jobs category, and disabled workers of environments that promote inclusion and
are discriminated when it comes to gaining respect ; and the promotion of a highly skilled,
promotion and accessing further training. innovative and diverse workforce.
The situation of those people that become Sometimes, the integration of disability
disabled during their career should also issues into the mainstream processes
be considered. Another target group that will be easy. In other cases, some further
we should take into consideration are the changes and reasonable accommodations
often forgotten family members that are will be needed. For the purpose of this
responsible for taking care of people publication, we understand by reasonable
with disabilities, in particular parents accommodation any change or adjustment
( mostly mothers ) of moderately and severely to a job, the work environment or the way
disabled children, who often have to leave things usually are done that would allow a
the labour market in order to care for their person with a special need / requirement to
children because existing care and support apply for a job, perform job functions, or
services inadequately meet their needs. enjoy equal access to benefits available to
Policies that take into account the specific other individuals in the workplace.
needs of these groups must be put in place.
Social Economy constitutes one of the
most active employment generators in
Challenges
Europe, combining quality employment
In many cases the unemployment or and inclusive employment that includes
inactivity of people with disabilities does the most vulnerable people, such as those
not relate to the impossibility of people with disabilities. Therefore, the provision
with disabilities to work but to other issues of employment for people with disabilities
related to their personal background or to the in Social Economy enterprises and
work environment. These include the lack of organisations is, of course, a major issue.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
• Specific training at the job site provided The project focuses on students and
by a trainer who accompanies the graduates with physical, intellectual and
worker and trains him / her on the sensory disabilities, organisations of
specific tasks of the position ; this people with disabilities, their employers,
support is progressively reduced as well as employers’ organisations,
according to the worker’s needs ; and intermediaries and policymakers. It is
aimed at improving the professional skills
• Long-term follow-up ; the trainer
and abilities of final-year disabled students
periodically monitors the worker’s
as well as providing them with the
accomplishments.
opportunity to gain work experience. As
part of the project, a six-month mentoring
programme is being developed to bring
v Get involved in schemes that help people together these students and employers
with disabilities to get integrated into the interested in working with them.
ordinary work environment. An example
of these mechanisms are the mentoring As a follow-up to this project and given
schemes. Mentoring is the process by the importance of having the mentoring
which a more experienced person ( a process certified, another EU Leonardo
mentor ) provides guidance in the form of Da Vinci project has been launched.
training and support to a less experienced Entitled “Validation of Mentoring”, the
person ( a mentee ). Mentoring has proven main purpose is to create procedures
to be a successful mechanism for achieving and frameworks for validating mentoring
better integration of people with disabilities programmes.
in many fields, and particularly in the labour Contact person : Petya Grudeva, Public
market. Mentoring schemes have a wide Relations ; Marie Curie Association
range of benefits for all parties : ( Bulgaria )
• Mentees with disabilities can obtain E-mail : petia@marie-curie-bg.org
practical skills and knowledge in a Website : www.mentoring-validation.org ;
real working atmosphere. They can www.validation-mentoring.org ; .
www.marie-curie-bg.org / mentoring
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
schemes.and.services.accessible,.focusing.
an.enabling.environment,.enabling.society.
fi.rst.on.the.needs.of.deaf.people.using.
and.enabling.processes.
sign.language,.and.then.the.entire.group.of.
Contact person.:.Cearbhall.E..O’Meadhra.;. people.with.hearing.impairments..To.better.
Representative.of.EIDD.–.Design-for-All. understand.the.needs.of.this.group.and.in.
Europe.at.the.European.Disablity.Forum order.to.make.the.necessary.adaptations,.
Email.:.president@idd.ie a.working.group.composed.of.people.with.
Webpage :.www.design-for-all.org hearing.impairments.and.staff.members.
of.MACIF.was.created..Based.on.the.
recommendations.of.the.working.group,.the.
v. .Develop.strategies.to.help.staff.of.the. following.measures.were.introduced.:
organisation.tackle.the.challenge.of. •. A
. .website.adapted.for.people.
dealing.with.people.with.special.needs.. with.hearing.impairments.(.www..
These.could.include.: macifsourds.com.),.which.is.translated.
. •. T
. raining.and.support.for.staff.to.build. into.sign.language.and.accessible.
awareness.and.skills.needed.to.deal. from.the.organisation’s.main.website..
with.this.group.of.customers.in.a. It.includes.information.on.the.services.
confi.dent,.respectful.and.courteous. offered.by.MACIF.as.well.as.other.
manner,.i.e..in.a.way.that.they.are. interesting.facts.for.deaf.people.;
treated.as.equal.citizens.with.the.same. •. A
. n.identity.image.requested.and.
rights.and.obligations.as.everyone.. designed.by.deaf.people.with.a.special.
Training.can.be.provided.by.external. symbol.;
organisations.or.internally.and.can.
consist.of.stimulating.informal.debate.
on.the.issue.and.how.to.address.it.
. •. R
. aising.awareness.about.the.
organisation’s.commitment.to.
persons.with.disabilities.and.about. •. S
. implifi.cation.of.tools.and.mechanisms.
the.disability-friendly.features.of. used.for.daily.services,.e.g..the.
the.premises.and.the.goods.and./.or. availability.of.a.special.fax.number.
services.offered.among.staff.and. and.e-mail.address.for.daily.activities,.
other.members.and.partners.of.the. adapted.forms,.the.possibility.of.
organisation. discussing.a.particular.issue.via.
. •. I.ncluding.in.the.customer.service. webcam.with.specialised.staff,.and.the.
and.safety.plans.a.section.regarding. setting.up.of.pictograms.and.illustrations.
people.with.disabilities. related.to.the.different.terms.;
•. A
. wareness-raising.and.training.
initiatives.for.staff.members.and.
Since.2004,.the.mutual.society MACIF. partners.on.how.to.deal.with.people.
(.France.).has.devoted.a.lot.of.effort. with.hearing.impairments..These.
to.adapting.their.services.in.order.to. included.training.sessions.and.a.
eliminate.and.avoid.the.current.and. subscription.to.specialised.magazines.
potential.barriers.that.people.with. in.the.sector,.among.other.activities.;
disabilities.face.in.relation.to.insurance. •. T
. raining.of.certain.staff.members.to.be.
schemes.and.services. better.able.to.deal.with.disabled.clients.;
In.the.fi.rst.phase.of.this.work.and.as.a.way. •. S
. etting.up.of.reception.points.for.deaf.
of.gaining.experience,.MACIF.initiated.a. people.where.special.technical.aids,.such.
refl.ection.on.how.to.make.its.insurance. as.induction.loops,.are.made.available.;
33
34
35
The current health care model is primarily children’s health and on the part of
designed for the “average person”, professionals regarding the needs of
and thus presents significant barriers for people with disabilities.
people with disabilities in terms of access to
appropriate services since they do not fully Some practical ideas to overcome
comply with what are considered “normal these challenges
standards”. In addition, although people
These practical suggestions are addressed
with disabilities are not and do not consider
to any individual or organisation active in
themselves unhealthy, in many cases they
the health field, including health policy-
require specific, regular and more intense
makers, health professionals, organisations
health care assistance than other citizens.
supporting or developing health projects, as
The health system does not seem to meet the well as to any other actor in the health field
needs of people with disabilities, which can willing to integrate disability into their work.
vary considerably according to the type of
Key areas of activity that can be taken up to
impairment or severity of disability. In many
overcome these challenges are as follows :
cases, the disability is not even taken into
account because health care professionals v Promotion of research and prevention,
do not know how to deal with it. early detection and early attention. These
actions can lessen, or even remove or
Challenges even prevent the effects of a disability. To
promote this, it is essential to foster and
The following appear to be the greatest
apply research in these areas.
challenges to equal access :
v Implementation of universal accessibility
• Financial : high cost of necessary care.
in health environments, processes, and
• Physical : physical inaccessibility of many procedures. For example :
health services.
• Providing people with disabilities
• Service provision : lack of availability of with all necessary information in
community-based provisions. appropriate formats.
• Barriers to information : lack, or • Full accessibility of all services
inaccessibility, of information about what including emergency services.
is available.
• Provision of services at reasonable
• Attitudinal, communication and social costs.
barriers manifested through, for example,
• Promotion of community-based
attitudes of medical professionals that
provision of information, advice and
may even be discriminatory. For instance,
training.
in many cases, when assisting people
with disabilities, medical personnel talk • Elimination of communication barriers
with their parents or with the persons that currently exist in hospitals and
assisting them rather than with the health care services to ensure that
disabled individuals themselves, who disabled patients can communicate in
as a consequence will find themselves other ways, e.g. sign language or other.
excluded from their own treatment and
• Simplification of paperwork and
unable to express their needs.
ensuring accessibility of administrative
• Knowledge : a lack of knowledge on procedures for gaining access to
the parents’ part of how to protect their health care services.
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
The Carnegie United Kingdom Trust Lloyds TSB Foundation for England and
( United Kingdom ) has a statement of Wales ( United Kingdom ) asks applicants
values underpinning its work, including a to provide, as part of its assessment
commitment to social justice, equality of process, “a copy of your equal
opportunity and anti-discrimination. opportunities policy or if you do not have
one, information about your commitment
The Trust’s entire portfolio of programmes
to equal opportunities”.
and its five-year strategy are informed by
this statement. In support of this, the Trust In the application form, the Foundation
has also introduced external monitoring asks applicants if they have an equal
and evaluation of all programmes. opportunities policy and how it is
implemented. They are also asked to
This is part of a comprehensive approach
give an estimate of the percentage of
to diversity applied to the organisation
service users based on several categories,
itself and to its programmes .
including ethnicity and disability.
Contact person : Charlie McConnell, .
Contact person : Louise Harley, .
Chief Executive ; Carnegie United Kingdom
Contact Person ; Lloyds TSB Foundation
Trust ( United Kingdom )
( United Kingdom )
E-mail : charlie@carnegieuk.org
Email : Louise.Harley@
Website : www.carnegieuktrust.org.uk
lloydstsbfoundations.org.uk
Website : www.lloydstsbfoundations.org.uk
46
This section analyses in detail the various Application and guidance materials
aspects of the funding process. Although
v Ensure that applications and guidance
the proposals concern people with
materials are accessible by providing
disabilities, they will be of direct interest to
a wide range of sources through which
other groups :
materials can be obtained ( Braille,
audio, large print, easy read, etc. ) and
Marketing and raising awareness
making material available through various
about funding opportunities
channels, e.g. via direct mail, websites,
v Make sure that information on different e-mail. When using websites, make sure
types of funding reaches people with that they meet accessibility requirements
disabilities by adopting tailored marketing ( see section 3.8 ).
strategies and targeting specific applicant
v Be clear and simple. For example, provide
groups, where appropriate. Effective
a checklist of all materials required and
methods include the use of local radio
how to access them, have separate
and press, including articles in specialist
application forms and guidance for each
publications, and disseminating
funding stream, and provide examples on
information through community events
and to local, regional and disability how funding has been used before.
organisations. v Be flexible regarding the requirements
v Ensure that accessibility requirements for awarding a grant, and in particular,
are taken into account in marketing and when making specific statements, ensure
promotional strategies and materials that certain groups are not accidentally
( paper or electronic ) ( see section 3.8 ). or carelessly excluded. For example, if
an educational trust only funds young
v Consider positive action to encourage the people up to the age of 21, its criteria
participation of people with disabilities may exclude some people with learning
and their representative organisations difficulties who develop more slowly than
in funded projects ( both as funding the average person does and who would
applicants and as receivers and not be able to take advantage of a course
beneficiaries of project outcomes ) e.g. until over the age limit.
funding projects that actively seek to
recruit and retain people with disabilities v Accept applications in different formats
or that encourage people with disabilities and through different means.
to apply for grants. v Include an evaluation form focusing on the
v There are however some discussions ease of the application process and the
about the relevance of including specific contents of relevant documentation.
statements in marketing strategies.
One issue is that including such a list Project selection
can be perceived as a catalogue for
v Ensure that applicant organisations are
the disadvantaged elite and therefore
committed to equal opportunities and
anyone not on the list should not apply.
the projects selected contribute to the
At the same time, groups that are often
promotion of non-discrimination and
discriminated against say they prefer
equal opportunities and do not create
to be specifically mentioned because
new barriers. You can do so by asking
their life experience is one of exclusion
applicant organisations during the
unless otherwise positively invited.
application process questions that require
An intermediate option would be to
them to prove their commitment and show
state that “all disadvantaged groups
how they will implement it in practice.
are encouraged to apply” and then, if
considered necessary, mention some of v When disability projects fail, analyse the
them. reasons in order to strengthen guidance
47
48
49
In spite of the legislative measures and communities if their needs were taken into
practices implemented in recent years, account in mainstream accommodation and,
people with disabilities still face many where necessary, special housing or special
barriers preventing them from having access support schemes were set up. Although
to housing or adapting their houses to meet the priority should be given to mainstream
their needs. housing, special housing may be needed in
certain cases and for certain groups, such
This situation has a direct effect on both
as for people with severe disabilities or with
people with disabilities and their families.
complex dependency needs.
On the one hand, people with disabilities find
it difficult to live independently both because Social Economy organisations and in
they cannot find suitable accommodation particular housing associations and co-
or because they are obliged to live in operatives as well as foundations and
accommodation that effectively imprisons mutual societies, in partnership with public
them at home and makes them dependent and private partners, are developing many
on others in their daily activities. This can innovative ways to break down these
also increase the impact of their impairment barriers.
and even induce further disability. On the The solutions listed below are addressed
other hand, families of the disabled find it to any person or organisation involved in
extremely difficult to find suitable housing, the design, construction or management
in many cases due to a shortage of suitably of housing. They include architects, interior
sized accommodation, whether flats or designers, housing decision-makers, public
houses, which can be adapted to meet administrations, organisations developing
the requirements of a disabled person. or providing financial support for housing
Improving this situation would also be projects, persons with disabilities and their
directly beneficial for elderly people, an families.
important consideration given today’s ageing
population. In general, solutions should all aim to follow
four main objectives in this regard :
Challenges • To respect first and foremost a disabled
Key barriers include : person’s own choices – he / she should
have the opportunity to try different
• Architectural barriers. alternatives ;
• Financial barriers, in particular because • To take into account the perspective of
of the extra costs of acquiring an adapted the family, in cases where a disabled
house or adapting inaccessible dwellings. person needs support in decision-
• Communication barriers and negative making ;
attitudes or prejudices within the • To give greater independence to disabled
community, which make it difficult for people ; and
people with disabilities to integrate into
their environment. • To help them to stay and / or integrate into
the wider community.
Some practical ideas to overcome In line with these objectives, the following
these challenges should be observed :
It is proven that many people with disabilities • Unless they decide otherwise, people
could live independently and / or stay in their with mild disabilities should be given the
50
• For those who cannot manage to live in · Level or gently sloping approach to
mainstream housing, specific schemes the house ;
should be promoted to allow them to · Accessible threshold that is covered
maintain and develop a strong level and well lit ;
of independence. They include small
· Lifts fully wheelchair accessible in
housing schemes in the community, flats. Stairs in flats should provide
where they receive the required support, easy access ;
or, for those who prefer this option,
· Width of door and hall that allow
specific residential centres with close
wheelchair access ;
links to the community ;
· Turning circle for wheelchair in
• For people with severe disabilities
ground-floor living room ;
requiring 24-hour support, special
residential centres may be needed, but · Living room or family room at
efforts should be made to develop strong entrance level ;
links with surrounding communities and to · Identified space for temporary bed at
promote the person’s independence and entrance level ;
empowerment ; and
· Accessible entrance-level WC, plus
• People with disabilities should only be opportunity for the installation of a
placed in residential centres if they so shower later ;
desire or when there is no other option · Walls that can be adapted ;
( e.g. persons with complex dependency
· Provision for a future stair lift ;
needs, etc. ). These institutions should
provide housing and living facilities that · Easy route for a hoist from bedroom
aim to promote disabled persons’ self- to bathroom ;
determination and equal participation · Bathroom planned to give side
in the community. Institutions that do access to bath and WC ;
not respect these principles should be
· Low window sills ; and
replaced by community-based services
that pursue the goals mentioned above. · Sockets, controls, etc. at a
convenient height.
Other practical ideas include :
v When getting involved in the design or The concept of Lifetime Homes was
construction of new mainstream public developed by the Joseph Rowntree
and private housing projects : Foundation ( JRF ) ( United Kingdom ) in
the early 1990s as a result of its concern
• Make sure that the housing is designed
about the bad quality and in particular the
according to inclusive standards such inaccessibility and inconvenience of many
as the barrier-free or Lifetime Homes British houses for large segments of the
standards, using the ‘design for all’ population.
approach. Lifetime Homes include
Lifetime Homes have 16 accessibility
accessibility and design features that
and design features that make the home
make them flexible enough to meet
flexible enough to meet the changing
every type of need. Features include :
needs of most people at all stages of
· Sufficiently wide parking space for a life, including older people, people with
wheelchair user ;
51
52
53
v When dealing with the provision of v Set up advice, information, and support
financial support, provide financial aid services to help people with disabilities to
for adaptations and acquisition of homes gain access to grants and loans relating to
for disabled homeowners and people with housing.
disabilities living in private rented housing. v Always work closely with social actors
to identify the needs of people with
disabilities.
Created in 2006, the Fondation Leroy
Merlin ( France ) is committed to the v Pay special attention to the situation of
improvement of housing for disabled and families with disabled children, many of
elderly people. The foundation supports whom live in inadequate and overcrowded
projects related to : conditions. More and larger specially
designed houses should be built to satisfy
• Overall considerations regarding their needs.
the evolution of housing ( both on a
practical and an aesthetic level ) ;
• Research into new housing for disabled
and elderly populations ;
• The creation of services related to the
needs and problems encountered in
the improvement of housing by people
54
This section gathers some tips and the responsibility for ensuring accessibility.
recommendations on transversal issues Design-for-All aims to achieve the recognition
that can be applied to any of the already of the Enabling Interface that a person uses
mentioned areas, or they can be used in to function within life. This enabling interface
other fields of daily life. It is addressed to calls for an enabling environment, enabling
any person willing to include a disability society and enabling processes. Design-
dimension in his / her work. for-All breaks the process of such decision-
making into :
Access and accessibility • Awareness
Accessibility is not just about ramps, • Consultation
automatic doors and other physical features,
but refers to any features that make an • Impact assessment
environment accessible. In addition, it not The traditional view of “disability” is the
only benefits people with disabilities ; it medically defined loss of a bodily function.
also makes participation easier and more The Design-for-All methodology defines
effective for other users who are excluded, “disability” as the disablement that such
including young and old alike, people who a person encounters in his / her workplace
speak different languages, etc. Despite this due to the fact that the interface that he / she
thinking, there is a current lack of awareness uses is not enabled by the environment in
and information on the need for accessibility which the person is operating. Therefore, this
among stakeholders, and the lack of methodology focuses on the interfaces and
appropriate technical knowledge. what environmental factors will enable the
For example, large print and audio person with disabilities to function in society.
tapes benefit not only people with visual
impairments but people for whom English is E-Accessibility
not their first language. Likewise, accessible Access to information has become an
environments are convenient for elderly essential need in today’s knowledge society.
people and parents with little children. Overcoming the technical barriers and
Therefore, it is important that you ensure difficulties that people with disabilities and
from the beginning that there are no physical, others experience when trying to participate
attitudinal, or other barriers preventing on equal terms in the Information Society ( IS )
persons with disabilities from having access is known as “eAccessibility.”
to your organisation and the initiatives it This is part of the broader eInclusion
carries and / or supports. This has proven to concept, which also addresses other types
be most effective and avoids costly changes of barriers, such as financial, geographical,
to initiatives, programmes, and venues. or educational.
In addition, the Design-for-All methodology Accessible websites and accessible adapted
gives a new approach, overcoming ICT equipment are essential to ensure equal
accessibility policies. It shifts the focus of opportunities for people with disabilities.
disability from the person to the environment
Some practical ideas to overcome these
in which this person lives and works.
challenges :
Design-for-All is a methodology dealing
Built environment
with the process of decision-making within
an organisation and not just at the level of v For the purpose of this publication, the
the specific operative department that has built environment covers all internal
55
56
v It is also important to provide terms, do not use elaborated and closely
accessible and affordable equipment spaced fonts.
to workers / members of organisations, v Size : Whenever possible, use font size
adapted to their capacities and needs. 12 as a minimum standard and font
v Access to adapted equipment is as size 14-16 ( large print ) when producing
important as adapted software. For this, documents for visually impaired readers
social prices for ICT-adapted equipment Do not use more than 18-20 points.
should be established in order to v Capitals : Avoid using capital letters for
guarantee accessibility. blocks of text, e.g. more than one or two
Website words They are too similar in size and
shape for readers to be able to easily
v Make sure that your website complies distinguish letters.
with accessibility and usability criteria.
Some features commonly used in v Italics : Avoid italics, they are harder to
websites cause problems for people read.
with disabilities. Some alternatives are v Colour and paper : Be careful before
available to resolve these barriers. For choosing colours so that there is a
example : significant contrast between them.
• Always provide a text-only format as v Graphics and images : The use of
an alternative for people using screen graphics and images can facilitate reading
readers, which “read” text and then for people with intellectual disabilities.
convert it to speech output for people However, ensure that these images can be
with visual impairments. read by the programmes used by people
with visual impairments. In this sense,
• Pay attention to the use of colour
consider including an explanation next to
contrasts so that people with colour
the image.
blindness can easily use the site.
v Whenever possible, develop easy-to-
• Avoid the use of small areas for links
read documents so that people with an
which make it difficult for people with
intellectual disability can have access to
restricted manual dexterity to navigate.
the information.
• Provide mouse-free navigation.
v Avoid splitting up words at the end of a
• Therefore, ensure that your line.
organisation’s or enterprise’s website
v Lighten your pages ( about 150 words per
is accessible, taking into consideration
page A4 ).
the Guidelines included in the Web
Accessibility Initiative ( WAI ), which can v Whenever possible, before publishing the
be downloaded at www.w3.org / WAI / . information, test it with your audience.
v Make printed material legible and v Images can facilitate reading for people
accessible for people with visual with intellectual disabilities. However,
impairments by considering issues such some screen readers used by people with
as print size, weight, font, contrast, case, visual impairments cannot read graphic
colour, etc. This implies no extra cost and information. Therefore, a text description
also makes documents more readable for should be included next to the picture.
other citizens. Oral communication ( in formal
conversations, speeches, etc )
v Font : Use large and clear fonts. Visually
impaired readers may find it easier to read v Keep language simple by avoiding jargon
“sans serif” fonts, such as Arial. In general and using simple words ; explain complex
57
58
59
60
61
62
List of resources
63
64
The CEP-CMAF is the EU-level representative organisation for the Social Economy.
Social Economy represents 10% of all European businesses, which equals two million
businesses employing more than nine million workers, or in other words, 10% of
all jobs. The CEP-CMAF aims to give Social Economy organisations better visibility
on issues which are common to them at a European level with a view to gaining
recognition for the Social Economy as a sector that produces both economic and
social wealth; promoting the role and values of the social economy actors throughout
Europe; and reinforcing their political and legal recognition at European level. For
further information, please visit www.cepcmaf.org