Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Response Spectrum
February 2012
Surface Waves
Amplitude
P PP S
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time (s)
0.3
PGA=0.32g
0.2
0.1
Accn. (g)
0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Time (seconds)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (sec)
Fault
Time, sec
T=2 sec,
Damping =2%
a(t)/g
Time, sec
Ground motion time history
Sudhir K. Jain February 2012 Slide 11
Response Spectrum (contd…)
d(t)
Time, sec
T=2 sec,
Time History of Deformation (relative displacement
of mass with respect to base) response Damping =2%
a(t)/g
Time, sec
Ground motion time history
ag(t)/g Displacement
Response
Spectrum for
Time, sec
T=0.5 sec the above time
=2% history
d(t)/g
T=1.0 sec
=2% d(t)/g
dmax
T=2.0 sec
=2% d(t)/g
Time, sec
Figure After Chopra, 2001 T, sec
Acceleration, g
Mass = 10,000kg
Natural Period T=1 sec
Damping =5% of critical
3m
Time (sec)
Ground Acceleration Time History
Maximum Acceleration, g
From Response Spectrum:
Spectral Acceleration (for T=1sec) = 0.48 g
Max. Base Shear = Mass x Spectral Accln.
=(10,000kg) x (0.48x9.81m/sec2)
= 47,000 N = 47 kN
Max. Base Moment Undamped Natural Period T (sec)
=(47kN) x (3m) = 141 kN-m Acceleration Response Spectrum for the
above accelerogram for 5% damping
(Fig. from Seed and Idriss, 1982)
Sudhir K. Jain February 2012 Slide 17
Response Spectrum (contd…)
Note that the two response spectra above show very different frequency content. Ground
motion B has more energy at low periods. An expert may be able to make out from these
spectra that B is recorded at a short distance (say 15km) from a small earthquake, while A
is recorded from a large earthquake at a large distance (say 100km) (Fig. edited from
Housner, 1970)
1.60
1.40
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.00
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
Period (sec)
Spectral Acceleration, g
Fig. from
Geotechnical
Earthquake
Engineering, by
Kramer, 1996
Period (sec)
Sudhir K. Jain February 2012 Slide 39
Soil Effect (contd…)
Fig. from
IS:1893-2002
Period(s)
Sudhir K. Jain February 2012 Slide 40
Shape of Design Spectrum
The three curves in Fig. 2 have been drawn
based on general trends of average response
spectra shapes.
In recent years, the US codes (UBC, NEHRP and
IBC) have provided more sophistication wherein
the shape of design spectrum varies from area
to area depending on the ground motion
characteristics expected.
Spectral acceleration
up the ascending part
of the graph.
Codes tend to
disallow the reduction
in force in the period
range of T < 0.1sec
T(seconds)