Wig pt Abivio: gta» Coto cartons oe : asin fit He Se exec aevicw “Pell Coty ae coro cot Year 2007 ad PERE nd Ye te “Hida of Cas Wine ie, ue gy di 1 oy a INO M. BRONDIAL. i in vidi ws Ae Oth BER, Lean #6 stmt din ead by 0 at bt widiion Chalk bes dl 4 wad eg: Ey. by ladies 4. JURISDICTION Gy of Na ve dg ca Sit Siaicion 16 anthem to pout fo pat id 0 cefixan fin a sk OF {No ‘New in iin, coos, iS quinn, 0 its ob ‘apd Dy sd cml Bo byl of ogeal arcs > Ra lingo Cnt 4 thy poet Wnt tect a in inainid i pan ty tarde C1 and eat CR Cd old one oy Snes Hey 10 ve ae ‘ara Pepenance, “th id i BF “Ge ain it congeted by I te cia ly woineis roi: poe (st Conn Hany ts at td by ‘ae ee te gee ore(gente oy He tat cata ke, FAL Aekiintion Hi. G cai ast coro kt « Compt Iie ler Ae OAR, D. Venue of Aetios (Teanga ‘ipion in corte Cina, by ested 9 Ys of Foci ei ating. fy my i a 1 tebe Pam, den ain wet ES 63 at duct seed 30. cat ie 8 MA, par Sagat ‘ean piston WF A Kindo Pasig 6) aniomatic vith i, "Va do batea oni Se 2: Miedado vs. Heirs of Antonio Consuing, 665 SCRA $34 J + $3x80Avs.Paler, 614 SCI 4. 'Baman vs. Coce-Cola 5. Uyws. CA, 770 SCRA 513 ‘6. Banditlon vs. LPUC, 770 SCRA, 7. People'vs. Arojedo, 774 SCRA 193 Tomes ve PREGER,© Aegon n Pests 8) ‘Reipanle document (07, Rees cay Spans erika agree ve T Posen Medical Emterpices ink MS Weseyan hop ey 2AON "eile fo day fh pate nd eatin oF on aint duc Av. RULES 10413 file DoW ~ ptt, OF on © Ow ‘A. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings (R10) felt, Woe lig a gee YE exe ne age mes oe i 1 eo cy thle i nn te dag Te pe “Toutnd. «Eval «Wed Pticatonky weg Ge FHM ‘hn «gaye ain tig yan Sits) a cn av 2 aon 6 seta 815: ena psa an ove On Copoations pte -13) 7 Moye odes Yo Sipe. Silt, oF mans ‘igh cas > ie onc, octinn> dal coped uth ‘eames eget od peed in he aig doin. Whawte cine: 4 cpt - guts sn “GP ser aia 8 G. Voluntary Appearance (S-2 1. Sunrise Garden Corp. vs. CA~711 SCRA 616 efile 0 Min cei pa A ste we va msisns9 hy eC oi 284 Ae glen pO it Graded A fe tem die ciel for igen is dei 0 tation Compt (out E + Suge 00 te mits 3 Lack of cause of at «hy og Cat Hi eh Wet itin Cefmindl Costs, ie quicditiona - en tee Ty con iv bated by ele ver a dale, anid or contd oF 1ent frodi Conclusiveness o! a Matt, 4 don oh judg Wepre peo “tit an oc Hab hy pang "Yo pling des no Rad cg oo coe FEB of Dim tate avon EAE of Dismissal (S- Tea ay cia fet tte thao ton, wt Rh ‘Actions ee Races eure Prseate(©3) ec on pdt | a ‘Gh ix mreme Court effective: id oon of A pia 127 sn SSE IE total rin ‘onduct of pretrial and use of depo te, fa Ya Wied Hr opel Per jo ron ao. Failure to appear atthe pre-ta ‘mae fe en ho 1 “a” Son @ iegl og barged tae nen Te, a Ht ontain ‘sli nein te a . ww # oft, rane teton 4g win, Woe be pied bg ein of PR ; po Esc’ Hi Wt oe om = peat Pra pitas RA, ak hal. net te cae teed in Cin. Caees, rt ting «. Deposition upon copa 4 Deposition upon writen in (igh Whe Cor toot Nein Baty to 10. Bebe of enor and iregulr pce, pin acted ‘aout 2 Deposition before Actions or Pending Appeal (R24) by “he col interrogatories (S-6) ve request for admission (8-25)tod be ple tt 1993) 199 SCRA 680 dose a chy kd 80 fda q wae gy i 1 al ged ota cite‘it lon for Nad Til 4. orton Ripe og Now ia. haemghe 1S tne aerate onan a ial aha: “\STEIE REMEDIES AGAINST FINAL JUDGMENTS m an ; See * x. Sanne F fa of Swart is. oplitais in fal. a in au, esorsivg awd of damage Hamp i 1 dhiogs ele lock of axgicien eyidene: ‘uk Lik Ong vs. Co, 752 SCRA 42 Rigg 1RDeven ve Sango, 3958cR4 11 IAPNCE Ast 7a] SA Sa a8 2) pie - Eamon Rs pee Ping of C8, cha Bs Hendy opie Fei Spe a enemas acansr Pa Se ibenasers Ye is NP “elon fat gg dua an hw gp ie hae va i aan & *ERUEDS Ppp eet uy Wa, ot: Lin, ai nt log prs i ao Te epssinsa eines Grands + sl ~ Annuineot of dpe in Govern: Groundh, Period $1.23) + Fina Fd eat 4 a gtd Gants (1) “ik din pin ve Balnun esc 22 * ak ues \ 2 Santo ys. Sato, 737 SCRA O37 3..Lasala vs. National Food Authority, 767 SCRA 430 4. Manguba vs. Morga-Seva, 775 SCRA 312 $1 Sibi vs, Buguel, 778 SCRASI7: wc OPE ness rnomanr ose ‘Sige con ely fs ett fa ve oy i ey ue & stay of discretionary exe b. Judgments not stayed by “ty fe dot cn oat in Pedi ‘0 RES mss +e " Execution ana gad toni 2 Ba : kom, o— uit o¢ exon “we valid wot hd, heer yas aera tg fenton tw all. be 4 dar wa 6 Ne ee a win kt “ubdament 1% Gay.vy Eseton 4 ated Yo he alge we mi an § 2000 Faby of tn "umuaasiess “Phsmissal of Appeal (R-50) .. epunds ($1; "Material ata” ue 6 a veton ee — din x9 — Ih test of “re aw et a Winn Filing 4 ein an Bini dh ate a)HE Get cp oF Spey Til fat (CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Stott, fates fwd adicton over eiminal cases 2) by petition for eview b) by notice of appeal ition ition: a) by notice of appeal b) by petition for review Fuitdidion ote the He it omit ANogh agave aad gaal adele cipal oicanes ‘Alloffenses punishable with imprisonsient of not more thaa 6 years \Sndfiebaions of trafic rules and regulations te “Violations of the Bouncing Check Law °5- Drange to property wit ine of not more than P10,00.00 tein (A 14 ame by 88) bye | 3 ah pti cos = Allperosaa, amily and property relations cases between uslins residing jn dhe autonomous region of mula mindsnso 1H. What are military cours? Only service-oriented cases why! Note: Read the Cybercrime Prevention d Read Ds rv Serctay of ais Feb 18, 20 Pie, Comglanant onder im on tt tl cy elt Flag > fh. pay lag ig ut ft te, ey noi ticle ibjudl SY ottenses hedig, Ay Stn ond 4 day ond the nat jail -®-2asition of Criminal Actions Ses 1) Sit commit wo, mide, Neo MupLa. Si igi pod wy iannsacjet a Oe t Bey iatmmaton dois Catt vile Read Vimenes vs. Sorongon, 687 SCRA 151 =, secon Oe he ingsmaton B. Sufficiency of Complaint or Information (See. 6) dion, i tt te hat “ame of nde pay ene ee “hme of offense ue of acnin: uniing tnd aggravating circumstances «place of comamission ws, Valder, 663 SCRA 272 yet a ad a only te wthboon we peal vs, Sandiganbayan, 675 SCRA S60" al ot Soria, 685 SCRA 483 Pee i eae of cout onion > fe cout sho. iiss he eign prs acon ob inst (Se. 15- ini up fig of 9 in ciminal cases fon Bas, People, 667 scx 113 “RS the offended party (Sec. 16) oxmepamsat rile 19 eine' institution (WaRP) ) ary complaint >} om bled (uy Reeds People we. Valencia 214 SCRA 89 ‘BiQopniam of Evidence \pubeblacaie ve. prima facie §PRPIIGiv daarvo-Guierr, 775 SCRA 2 De Lima ve, Reyes 779 SCRA¥e yo oS RI 483 rest “yeeRefintion: ~how made; when; ime, method oe -who may arrest B. Wares Ane Se 2 ot egies a obligation of reso entered ints befor see duly authorized to take it, with the condition to do some Freie particularly the appearance ofthe accused for tri Batiiera0 Be bl RIC; MIC exercising special jurisdiction1 Aggie 7. Brrilevs. Sandiganbayan, August 18, 2015 BBDE 115 —Righis ofthe Accused ~ ‘Distinguish the constitutional from statutory tights ofthe accused RULE 116 - Arignment and Plew A. What is arraignment How; When, Where, Why guilty to capital offense vs, non-capital offense requirements ‘BuPrcemaitiononinepection of evidence in prosecution's possesion “nameden ofanseey Gils 23-29) =naon'spome oY Relimpension olegrignmen: " ultting from unsound mental condition eer @abnence of judicial personnel Reds 2. People we, Rstomaca ~ 256 SCRA 421 2 People ve. Pangilinan 518 SCRA 359 3. Daan vs. Sandiganbyan - 360 SCRA 233 4 People vs. Janjalani 539 SCRA 157 $-ABS-CEN Corp. va. Gozon, 753 SCRA 1F.Bill of Particulars ‘Read: Enrile s. People 766 SCRA 1, (8711/15) RNR 137- Motion to Quash fein ica. Msn Diss: rats \Abeien on Howto move to quash “Ctl motion is granted deniedBS Aalto: Pept, de “sp , ZPeple 8 Tan 82 e Fre Sandiganboyon ~ 645 SCRA 726 PSG Rangaion Jr ve. Bangayan — 659 SCRA petite es Z fe. Pepino, 779 BXix > |. Neire of judgment in criminal cases vs. civil cases 2. Judgment of conviction vs. judgment of apquitial 3, Juogment for two or more o Renses; accused 4 Promulgation, modification and entry of judgmentema Rule 126~ SEARCH AND SEIZURE |. The constitutional provision on searcnes and seizures 2. Search Warrant vs. Warrant of Arrest 3. When searches and seizures allowed without warrants ‘4, Motion to Quash rest” ~ 610 SCRA 670 127.— PROVISIONAL REMEDIES 0 Rules 57-61 alremedies are not applicable in criminal eases