Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 UTRAN-RRM ws11 PDF
10 UTRAN-RRM ws11 PDF
Introduction
Handover Control
Soft/Softer Handover
BTS 3 Inter Frequency Handover
Power Control
Closed Loop Power Control
Open Loop Power Control
Interference Management
UE BTS 2
Load Control
Call Admission Control
BTS 1 Congestion Control
Packet Data Transmission
Packet Data Control
Dynamic Scheduling
References
H. Holma, A. Toskala (Ed.), “WCDMA for UMTS”, Wiley, 5th edition, Wiley, 2010
Walke, Althoff, Seidenberg: UMTS – Ein Kurs. J. Schlembach Fachverlag, 2002
H. Kaaranen, et.al., “UMTS Networks: Architecture, Mobility and Services”,
Wiley, 2001. (see chapter 4)
A. Viterbi: “CDMA: Principles of Spread Spectrum Communications,” Addison
Wesley, 1995.
J. Laiho, A. Wacker, T. Novosad (ed.): “Radio Network Planning and
Optimisation for UMTS,“ Wiley, 2001
T. Ojanperä, R. Prasad, “Wideband CDMA for Third Generation Mobile
Communication”, Artech House, 1998.
R. Prasad, W. Mohr, W. Konhäuser, “Third Generation Mobile Communications
Systems”, Artech House, March 2000.
3GPP standards:
TS 25.214: “Physical Layer Procedures“ (esp. power control)
TR 25.922: “Radio Resource Management Strategies“
TR 25.942: “RF System Scenarios“
typically in
Handover Load Packet Data RNC
Control Control Control
Medium
Power
Control Access typically in
Control NodeB
Physical layer
Handover in UMTS:
UE may have active radio links to more than one Node B
Mobile-assisted & network-based handover in UMTS:
UE reports measurements to UTRAN if reporting criteria (which are set by
the UTRAN) are met
UTRAN then decides to dynamically add or delete radio links depending
on the measurement results
Types of Handover:
Soft/Softer Handover (dedicated channels)
Hard Handover (shared channels)
Inter Frequency (Hard) Handover
Inter System Handover (e.g. UMTS-GSM)
Cell selection/re-selection (inactive or idle)
All handover types require heavy support from the UMTS network infrastructure!
NodeB 2
NodeB 1
UE
In soft/softer handover the UE maintains active radio links to more than one
Node B
Combination of the signals from multiple active radio links is necessary
Soft Handover
The mobile is connected to (at least) two cells belonging to different NodeBs
In uplink, the signals are combined in the RNC,
e.g. by means of selection combining using CRC
Softer Handover
The mobile is connected to two sectors within one NodeB
More efficient combining in the uplink is possible like
maximum ratio combining (MRC) in the NodeB instead of RNC
Note:
In uplink no additional signal is transmitted, while in downlink each new link
causes interference to other users, therefore:
Uplink: HO general increase performance
Downlink: Trade-off
soft handover
area
NodeB 1 UE NodeB 2
25%
20%
(Blocking and Dropping)
Outage Probability
1 link
15%
max 2 SHO links
max 4 SHO links
10%
max 6 SHO links
5%
0%
5 15 25 35 45 55
Offered Traffic [Erlang per site]
2
Mean Number of Active Links
1,5
0,5
0
1 2 4 6
Max . Active Set Size
Near-Far Problem:
• Spreading sequences are not orthogonal
(multi-user interference)
• Near mobile dominate
UE 1 • Signal to interference ratio is lower for far
mobiles and performance degrades
AND/OR
Inner Loop
Outer Loop
(1500 Hz)
( 100Hz)
UE
RNC
control command: Up/Down NodeB
Example: Uplink Closed Loop Power Control
6
Eb/N0 [dB]
5
2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
6
4
power/ fading [dB]
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
time [sec]
Example: UMTS Closed Loop Power Control in the slow fading channel
7.5
6.5
5.5
PedA
VehA
5
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Velocity [km/h]
Open loop power control is used on channels that cannot apply closed
loop power control, e.g. RACH, FACH
The transmitter power is determined on the basis of a path loss estimate
from the received power measure of the opposite direction
To avoid excessive interference, probes with incremental power steps
until a response is obtained: “power ramping”
UE
NodeB
Open Loop Power Control on RACH
Interference Problem
Inter-Symbolinterferenz (ISI) Delayed components from the
same user signal interfere due to
multipath propagation
Multiple Acces Interference – MAI Different user signals interfere
dependent on the access scheme
Intra-Cell Interference Interference caused by the users
belonging to same cell
Inter-Cell Interferenz Interference caused by the users
belonging to neighbor cells.
2.5
Maximum cell radius (km)
1.5
Downlink
0.5
Uplink
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Erlangs (2% GOS)
• Service/BLER-dependent
resource consumption
• Uplink example:
– Service I: Voice
Rb = 12.2kbps, Eb/Nt = 5dB
I = 0.99%
– Service II: Data
Rb = 144kbps, Eb/Nt = 3.1dB
II = 7.11%
Basic algorithm
• Admission control is triggered
when load thr_CAC
– New users are blocked
– Existing users are not
affected as long as load <
thr_ConC
• Congestion Control is
triggered when load
thr_ConC
– Reduce consumption of one
or several users
– Simple action: drop the user
– Repeat until load <
thr_ConC
50% 20%
thr_CAC = 50% thr_CAC = 50%
45% thr_CAC = 75% 18% thr_CAC = 75%
thr_CAC = 90% thr_CAC = 90%
40% 16%
35% 14%
Dropping Probability
Blocking Probability
30% 12%
25% 10%
20% 8%
15% 6%
10% 4%
5% 2%
0% 0%
5 15 25 35 45 55 5 15 25 35 45 55
90%
80%
70%
60%
Cell Loading
50%
40%
30%
20% thr_CAC = 50%
10% thr_CAC = 75%
thr_CAC = 90%
0%
5 15 25 35 45 55
Offered Tra ffic [Erla ng per site ]
Power Control:
– Balances user received quality (BLER, SIR)
– Users at cell center get less share of BTS
transmit power assigned than at cell edge
– Occurrence of power overload
UE 1 Rate Adaptation:
– Transmit power ~ data rate
– Users at cell edge get lower data rate assigned
than at cell center
– Reduces also power overload
NodeB On DCH combination of power control and
rate adaptation
high data rate – Rate assignment at begin of a transmission
area based on load and user location
low data rate – Rate adaptation when ongoing transmission
area UE 2 according to power consumption and overload
– Based on RRC-signaling (time horizon:
100msec … 10sec)
64k
20% 4
15% 3
10% 2
5% 1
0% 0
200 300 400 500 600 200 300 400 500 600
Ce ll Throughput [k Bit/s e c] Ce ll Throughput [kBit/s e c]
UE 3
With HSPA scope of resource allocation has been changed esp. for packet data
Dynamic scheduling in NodeB to quickly (re)allocate radio resources
Distribution of RRM between NodeB and RNC