Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EY Insurance Industry Challenges Reforms Realignment PDF
EY Insurance Industry Challenges Reforms Realignment PDF
3 Introduction ........................................................... 6
Products ............................................................... 18 6
Distribution ........................................................... 20
Customer servicing ............................................... 22
Products ............................................................... 24
Distribution ........................................................... 26
8 Bibliography ........................................................... 36
Contents
2
3
Foreword 1
After a decade of strong growth, the through constructive engagement and
Indian insurance industry is currently effective consultation with industry,
facing severe headwinds, grappling emphasizing on proper market conduct,
with slowing growth, rising costs, good governance, customer centricity and
deteriorating distribution structure ]^Õ[a]fl\akljaZmlagf&Oal`Y\]fkalqg^
Yf\klYdd]\j]^gjek&>gjl`]Õjkllae]$ US$64 compared to US$118 in developing
since the industry was liberalized and countries and US$3712 in advanced
opened to private and foreign insurers, economies in 2010, the domestic
the life insurance segment witnessed insurance industry still has considerable
a year-on-year decline (around 10%) scope for growth. However, a rethinking of
afl`]Õjklq]Yjhj]eame[gdd][l]\& the approach is required for the industry
The non-life segment is still struggling to achieve its potential. Innovation is the
with underwriting losses, while health Õjkl[YkmYdlqafla_`ldq[gfljgdd]\eYjc]lk
insurance is facing high claims ratio and leading to drying up of incentives for
af]^Õ[a]f[a]kafhgda[qY\eafakljYlagf& product manufacturers and decline in
business activities. However, this is not
However, the picture is not all gloomy,
to say that a free rein is recommended
while in the short run the industry may
]kh][aYddqafÕfYf[aYdk]jna[]kk][lgj&9
be undergoing a catharsis, the long-
certain degree of freedom aligned with
term picture is still compelling and a
the market maturity may be desirable.
stronger and better founded insurance
industry is likely to emerge from this Perhaps after a heady period of growth
challenging situation. The industry and glowing projections of the future,
needs to offer appropriate product it is time for the key stakeholders,
designs, which enable customized i.e., the industry, regulator and the
solutions for evolving customer needs in government to make a concerted
a professional and transparent manner, effort for the orderly development and
build and maintain trust among existing sustained growth of the industry.
and potential customers, effectively
The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII)
\]dan]jl`]hjg\m[lZ]f]Õlklgl`]
and Ernst & Young have co-authored this
customers and adopt a professional
report to outline the current issues and
code of conduct. At the same time, the
challenges faced by the insurance industry
regulator needs to create a favorable
and steps that could be taken to ensure
environment for a competitive market
that the industry achieves its potential.
Introduction
3
Indian economy
India recorded a growth in the gross =mjgrgf]$l`]c]qaf\a[Ylgjk\gfglj]Ö][l
domestic product (GDP) of 6.5% for a very strong picture. Growth forecasts
FY12, which was a sharp decline from for FY13 and FY14 are muted as well.
the 8.5% witnessed in FY10. Faced with Monetary measures seem to have had
Yh]jkakl]fl`a_`afÖYlagfgn]jl`]dYkl dalld]]^^][lgfl`]afÖYlagfafl`]YZk]f[]
two years and consequently, a high g^Õk[Ydla_`l]faf_Zql`]_gn]jfe]fl&
interest rate regime, the economy seems The prevalent high interest rate scenario
to have lost some steam. Although it has led to reduction in corporate
can be primarily attributed to the global activity and shrinking of margins.
economic conditions and problems in the
9.60% 9.30%
8.50%
8.00%
6.80% 6.50%
1,000 908
751 881
794
635 645
498 546
516
500
282
77 151
3 11 31
0
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
ICICI Prudential Life Insurance is the HSBC, Star Union Dai Ichi, IDBI Federal
largest private sector player (based on and India First Life Insurance. These
market share annualized new business insurers capitalize on the Bank’s captive
premium) followed closely by HDFC customer base and existing branch
Standard Life Insurance. The former has networks. Most of these players have a
lost 4% market share over the last three small or negligible agency presence.
years due to the emergence of stronger
distribution ramp ups by other players Non-life insurance
and the new regulatory regime that industry in India
impacted its ULIP-dominated business
According to Swiss Re, India’s non-life
mix. ICICI Prudential Life, HDFC Standard
insurance market was ranked number
Life, SBI Life, Bajaj Allianz and Max Life
19 among 156 countries in terms of
have managed to uphold their position in
premium in FY11; India’s total premium in
the top eight private insurers for the last
fgf%da^]afkmjYf[]_j]oZq0&) afÖYlagf
Õn][gfk][mlan]q]Yjk&O`ad]J]daYf[]
adjusted) while the global total premium
and HDFC have been gaining market
grew by 2.1%. The sector has grown at
share, Bajaj Allianz has lost considerable
a CAGR of 16% over the last 10 years.
share over the last three years. It can
The number of policies issued increased
be observed that most of the top eight
at a rate of 16.52% to 79.3 million in
private life insurers have strong banking
FY11 from 67.5 million in FY10. million
relationships. Further, the industry
in FY11 from 67.5 million in FY10.
has seen the entry of four new bank-
backed insurance players such as Canara
Gross written premium - non-life insurance (in INR billion) Segment-wise gross
300 written premium - FY11
263
CAGR 10 years=16%
250
218
10%
17%
191
190
173
177
200 6%
160
151
150
142
135
128
150
119
113
86
100
26%
53
35
50
23
13
41%
5
0
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
Underlying
growth drivers for
insurance in India
4
Exhibit 4.1. Drivers for the industry
Af[j]Yk]afl`]ogjcaf_hghmdYlagfYf\`a_`]j\akhgkYZd]af[ge] ?jgol`g^ÕfYf[aYd
Af[j]Yk]afYoYj]f]kkg^nYjagmkÕfYf[aYdhjg\m[lkaf[dm\af_afkmjYf[] industry as a whole
Need to invest for a secured future for self and for family Growth of life and
Higher spends on consumer goods, travel, automobiles, facilities which are non-life industry
underlying drivers of various insurance lines
Af[j]Ykaf_^g[mkgfea[jgafkmjYf[]mf\]jÕfYf[aYdaf[dmkagf
?jgol`g^kh][aÕ[
Increase in demand for motor insurance
insurance segments
Af[j]Yk]af[gklkg^`]Ydl`[Yj]Yf\?gnl&k[`]e]kgf`]Ydl`[Yj]
and purchasing Working population assessment and GDP per capita till 2026
Number INR
power 800 120
700 676
The demand for insurance products is 630 100
likely to increase due to the exponential 600 571
100.68
507 69.56 80
growth of household savings, purchasing 500 449
power, the middle class and the country’s 399
400 49.32 60
working population. The working
300 34.56 40
population (25–60 years) is expected 24.08
200 18.28
to increase from 675.8 million in 2006 20
to 795.5 million in 2026. Increased 100
incomes are expected to result in large 0 0
2001 2006 2011 2016 2021 2026
disposable incomes, which can be tapped
Zql`]ÕfYf[aYdk]jna[]kk][lgjaf_]f]jYd 25-60 (in millions) Projected GDP per capita in '000s
and the insurance sector in particular.
Source: CMIE, Census of India, 2001
5
Products therefore, is to develop innovative
products without crossing the boundaries
of insurability.
Strategy and design
Retirement planning is assuming
At a time when the highest NAV importance in India considering the
guaranteed ULIP were selling shift to nuclear families, increase in life
aggressively in the market, the IRDA expectancy, rise in health care costs,
banned the product in order to keep a and the need for reasonable income
tab on life insurers resorting to riskier post retirement; pension schemes
fund management to conform to their are designed keeping in mind these
commitment of guaranteed returns. objectives. IRDA forecasted that the
Not only did these products attract demand for pension schemes is likely
an increased premium, but they also to increase with the rise in the working
offer little protection to policyholders. population and therefore required a
9[[gj\af_lgAJ<9g^Õ[aYdk$Éafegklg^ guaranteed return of 4.5% to protect
these products, customers are being policy holders. However, it later withdrew
lured with the promise of a decent the requirement for new products but
eYlmjalqZ]f]Õl$Zmlaf[Yk]g^[dYaek af mandated upfront disclosures at the time
l`]]n]flg^\]Yl`!$l`]Z]f]Õlkgjl`] g^kYd]oal`j]kh][llgYkkmj]\Z]f]Õlk&
amounts are sometimes lower than the While, longevity and interest rate risks
premiums. The basic underlying principle continued to overhaul the pension
of a life insurance policy is it should have schemes, the additional requirements
km^Õ[a]flda^]jakc[gn]jÊ&L`]j]_mdYlgjak made the products too risky for insurers.
keen to oversee the product design more 9kafkmj]jk\a\fglÕf\l`]_ma\]daf]k
closely to better protect policyholders feasible, most of them withdrew their
^Yddaf_hj]qlgÉdgoÊgjÉafka_faÕ[YflÊda^] pension products from the market and
risk covers. The challenge for insurers, at present only a few insurers including
There is a gap between the management’s Cap on ULIP charges & increase in ;gehmdkgjqhmj[`Yk]g^Yffmalqaf
perception of customer expectation and dg[cafh]jag\ h]fkagfhdYfk
the actual customer expectation. Life Restriction on high distribution partner Even in case the policy is surrendered,
insurers need to adequately understand payouts 2/3 of accumulated funds will be used
what the customer really expects from his Reduction in overall contribution of to purchase an annuity
life insurance policy by obtaining regular ULIPs to new business premium Exit option being constrained may
feedback, conducting key client studies :]f]Õl\]jan]\Zqafkmj]jkgfY[[gmfl `Yn]ka_faÕ[Yflf]_Ylan]aehda[Ylagfk
and tracking customer complaints to of high lapses and hence more for the product segment
develop a product according to customer kmjj]f\]jh]fYdlqoaddZ]ka_faÕ[Yfldq
expectations. Next, insurers need to impacted due to the cap on surrender
adequately empower their sales force charges
to deliver an unforgettable customer Afkmj]jkk`goaf_hjgÕlk\m]lg
experience. release of lapse reserves will not
be able to sustain the same in the
Customer grievance includes any future unless long
dissatisfaction expressed by customers term operational
regarding service delivery, product ]^Õ[a]f[a]kYj]
expectations or any other aspect of developed Regulatory changes
business. The Grievances Cell of the impacting growth
Authority was set up by the regulator There have been a of the industry Persistency norms:
to receive grievances from the slew of regulations The regulation
policyholders. In FY11, a total of 9,656 around turnover stipulates a minimum
criteria to be a level of persistency to
complaints were received; 27% from LIC
referral partner and cap on referral be achieved by each licensed agent.
and balance from private insurers.
fee income as well as share of income This is expected to reduce the
Insurers should lay down a detailed through referral business agency force in the industry
customer grievance handling process, Training of tele-callers has been made Da[]fk]j]f]oYd2 IRDA has
o`a[`af[dm\]k]^Õ[a]flljY[caf_$imYdalq mandatory mandated a minimum business
of resolution, timely tracking and Cost of compliance expected to requirement norm for licensing
accurate reporting. Complaints received increase and some referral partners agent. This is expected to reduce
should be analyzed to check adherence who may have to apply for Broking part-time agents thus improve
license which could delay insurance customer service
and effectiveness of the process laid
distribution operations
down. Further, they need to be analyzed
with the intention to bring about
eg\aÕ[Ylagfklg]paklaf_hjg[]kk]k& J]_akljYlagfg^j]^]jjYdY_]flk ?ma\]daf]kYjgmf\Y_]flk
Non-life Insurance:
issues and challenges
6
Products price could not be varied, leading to a
uniform trend in pricing devoid of any
The non-life insurance industry has YeZa_malq&Oal`\]%lYja^Õ[Ylagf$l`]
been growing at a rate of more than regulator expected the “pricing” to
20% over the last two years. However, be determined by competitive forces.
the penetration was as low as 0.7% of @go]n]j$hgkl\]%lYja^Õ[Ylagf$afkmj]jk
the GDP in FY10. The robust growth have been operating at extremely low
seen over the last couple of years is prices, with certain players invariably
YlljaZmlYZd]lgaf[j]Ykaf_Y^Öm]f[]g^l`] depending on investment income to
Indian middle class, expansion of Indian offset operational losses, thus increasing
corporations and consistent efforts of the l`]dgkkjYlagk^gjl`]\]%lYja^Õ]\daf]k&
regulator to develop the market. The key Such price wars could prove fatal and
factors for growth are discussed below: eventually lead to quality taking a back
seat. The key challenge for non-life
insurance companies is balancing growth
Pricing
oal`hjgÕlYZadalq$oal`hja[af_hdYqaf_Yf
Pricing in the insurance business is a important role.
meticulous task. One, various risk factors
Price needs to be determined with a focus
need to be assessed to arrive at the
on long-tem sustainability. According
“right price” — a price that considers
to some players in the industry, this is
underwriting premium, withstands
only possible when “price” is tagged to
competition, generates operating
“return on equity”. Further, a risk-based
surplus and performs in the highly
pricing approach based on statistical
volatile economic market. Two, the
models needs to be applied where the
chief component of total cost, i.e., the
key focus is on solvency. This is only
cost of claims incurred is known only at
possible with a strong and proactive
Y^mlmj]\Yl]&Hjagjlg\]%lYja^Õ[Ylagf$
L`]YZadalqlgh]f]ljYl]l`]eYjc]l\m]lg^YeadaYjalqoal`kg[aYdYf\ Alkm^^]jk^jge[gfkljYaflkg^dgoqa]d\$lqha[Ydg^l`]
cultural norms makes it the primary channel, especially in B and C retail market.
category towns.
Direct channel The in-house sales force understands the features of product and Alkm^^]jk^jgel`]afYZadalqlgh]f]ljYl]afjmjYd
philosophy and the company, which give it an edge. areas where there is a need to push the product by
understanding the social and cultural norms.
Broking ;gehd]phjg\m[lg^^]jaf_koadd`]dhZjgc]jklgd]n]jY_]l`]aj]ph]jlak] >gjl`]Zjgc]jk$h]f]ljYlagfakdYj_]dqj]klja[l]\lg
further and their role is expected to evolve (in the retail space) from commercial products, which is limited by the slow
selling to client support and servicing. growth of the commercial segments.
Oal`\]%lYja^Õf_Yf\[gehd]phjg\m[lg^^]jaf_k$egj]Zjgc]jkYj] >gjl`]Zjgc]jkjak]afnajlmYdk]ddaf_[`Yff]dkakY
expected to enter the space, and niche areas are expected to emerge ka_faÕ[Yfll`j]Yl&
among broking.
Al]fbgqkl`]Y\nYflY_]g^fglj]imajaf_Yda[]fk]Yf\l`]f]]\lg
share databases.
L`][gj]hjghgkalagfakafj]f\]jaf_eYjc]laf_Yf\Y\eafakljYlan]
support to the insurance companies.
L`][`Yff]dakdac]dqlgZ]kgm_`lY^l]jYkl`]af\mkljqZ][ge]kegj]
developed and specialized.
Compensation Commission paid in sourcing business (at 0.1%) but stood at 7% for public
in FY11 stood at INR27 billion of which players in FY11. This is because of ceding
Since controlling expenses has become a the private sector paid INR8 billion. The commission being paid out by reinsurers,
challenge in the insurance business and commission translates to 4.6% of total o`a[`akkm^Õ[a]fllg[gn]j[geeakkagfk
most of these expenses are incurred on premium for private players and 7.7% paid by private players; however, this is
\akljaZmlagf$l`]akkm]g^]^Õ[a]fl[gkl of total premium for public players. The not true for public players due to higher
management is strongly attached to commission paid ratio was 6.43% for retention and commission paid to source
effective distribution. With the new IRDA non-life insurance in FY11, down from commercial business through brokers.
imposing restrictions on commission 7.23% in FY10. The net commission paid
structure and mandating additional ratio is close to zero for private players
disclosures, distributors will earn lower
commissions, going forward, and will
have to adjust their business models
accordingly.
Expense ratios
40%
35% 32.02% 33.79% 32.02% 31.37%
29.53% 29.56% 31.47%
30%
25%
20% 23.94% 24.85% 24.26% 24.24% 24.94%
21.23% 21.87%
15%
10%
5% 8.08% 8.94% 8.30% 7.69% 7.75% 7.23% 6.43%
0%
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
65.57% 70%
6,000
3099 60%
5,000
50%
4,000
40%
3,000 30%
1266.5
2,000 3933.8 20%
1,000 1931.4 10%
0 0%
FY10 FY11
Gross written premium Gross incurred claims Gross incurred claims ratio
Regulatory changes in the non-life insurance industry are primarily aimed at reducing
af]^Õ[a]f[qYf\af[j]Ykaf_[geh]lalan]f]kkoal`l`]a\]Yg^Zjaf_af_YZgmlhjg\m[l
innovation. The regulator now needs to focus on increasing the penetration of the non-
life insurance segment in the country.
F
gf%klYf\Yj\jYl]kg^lj]Yle]fl\m] Source: IRDA Annual Report, 2010-11
Frequent frauds In case of group health cover, claims ratio varied from state to state and was in the
decreased in FY11 mainly on account of rage of 60% to 120%. IRDA is expected
revision of prices in the overall industry to implement standardized rates for
(16%–20%), reducing losses to around certain procedures and modify the
100% from 120%. In case of individual claims management process for health
cover, the loss ratio was around 80% insurance. This will help reduce the claims
in FY11 due to some revision in prices. ratio further.
For government schemes, the loss ratio
Way forward
7
Ka_faÕ[YfldYl]fl The industry
eYjc]l Afe]]laf_l`]ka_faÕ[Yflhgl]flaYd$
the industry has an increased role
The Indian insurance market, though and responsibility. Three areas of
facing challenging times, is poised focus could be — a) product innovation
for strong growth in the long run. eYl[`af_l`]jakchjgÕd]g^l`]
The insurance density declined from policy holders b) reengineering the
US$64.4 in 2010 to US$60.6 in FY11 \akljaZmlagfYf\egj]ka_faÕ[Yfldq
and is expected to decline further in c) making sales and marketing more
FY12. However the insurance market responsible and answerable.
has a considerable amount of latent
potential, given the fact that the Indian
economy is expected to do well in the
Distribution
coming decades leading to increase in Distribution channels evolved in
per capita incomes and awareness. response to market dynamics and
changing consumer preferences. The
alignment of economic incentives with
distribution dynamics should be driven
by market forces rather than regulatory
intervention. Therefore, the questions
that arise are – Is there a model that
directly links incentives to investor
interests? And what steps, if any, should
@q\]jYZY\
GnYdG^Õ[]
18, iLabs Centre,
Hitech City, Madhapur,
Hyderabad - 500081
Tel: +91 40 6736 2000
Fax: +91 40 6736 2200
Our services
Assurance, Tax, Transactions, Advisory
A comprehensive range of high-quality services to
help you navigate your next phase of growth
Sector focus
Centers of excellence for key sectors
Our sector practices ensure our work with you is
tuned in to the realities of your industry
Stay connected
Easy access to our Webcasts and podcasts
knowledge publications. http://webcast.ey.com/thoughtcenter/
Any time.
www.ey.com/subscription-form
39
Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd.
Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory
9Zgml=jfklQgmf_
Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd. is one of the Indian client serving member firms of
EYGM Limited. For more information about our organization, please visit.
www.ey.com/in
Ernst & Young Pvt. Ltd. is a company registered under the Companies Act,
1956 having its registered office at 22 Camac Street, 3rd Floor, Block C,
Kolkata - 700016
ED 0414