Explore

salep pare

Case Processing Summary

salep pare Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

5% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0%

10% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0%

zonahambat 15% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0%

positif 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0%

negatif 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0%

Descriptivesa,b

salep pare Statistic Std. Error

zonahambat Mean 8.5333 .17638

Lower Bound 7.7744

95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Upper Bound 9.2922

5% Trimmed Mean .

Median 8.6000

Variance .093

10% Std. Deviation .30551

Minimum 8.20

Maximum 8.80

Range .60

Interquartile Range .

Skewness -.935 1.225

Kurtosis . .

15% Mean 9.0667 .37118

Lower Bound 7.4696

95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Upper Bound 10.6637

5% Trimmed Mean .

Median 8.8000

Variance .413

Std. Deviation .64291

 Minimum 8.60

Maximum 9.80

Range 1.20

Interquartile Range .

Skewness 1.545 1.225

Kurtosis . .

Mean 29.1667 1.32958

Lower Bound 23.4460

95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Upper Bound 34.8874

5% Trimmed Mean .

Median 28.6000

Variance 5.303

positif Std. Deviation 2.30290

Minimum 27.20

Maximum 31.70

Range 4.50

Interquartile Range .

Skewness 1.040 1.225

Kurtosis . .

a. zonahambat is constant when salep pare = 5%. It has been omitted.

b. zonahambat is constant when salep pare = negatif. It has been omitted.

Tests of Normalitya,c

salep pare Kolmogorov-Smirnovb Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

10% .253 3 . .964 3 .637

zonahambat 15% .328 3 . .871 3 .298

positif .264 3 . .955 3 .590

a. zonahambat is constant when salep pare = 5%. It has been omitted.

b. Lilliefors Significance Correction

c. zonahambat is constant when salep pare = negatif. It has been omitted.

Oneway
 ANOVA

zonahambat

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 1704.877 4 426.219 366.798 .000

Within Groups 11.620 10 1.162

Total 1716.497 14

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons

Dependent Variable: zonahambat

LSD

(I) salep pare (J) salep pare Mean Difference (I-J) Std. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

10% -8.53333* .88015 .000 -10.4944 -6.5722

15% -9.06667* .88015 .000 -11.0278 -7.1056

5%
positif -29.16667* .88015 .000 -31.1278 -27.2056

negatif .00000 .88015 1.000 -1.9611 1.9611

5% 8.53333* .88015 .000 6.5722 10.4944

15% -.53333 .88015 .558 -2.4944 1.4278

10%
positif -20.63333* .88015 .000 -22.5944 -18.6722

negatif 8.53333* .88015 .000 6.5722 10.4944

5% 9.06667* .88015 .000 7.1056 11.0278

10% .53333 .88015 .558 -1.4278 2.4944

15%
positif -20.10000* .88015 .000 -22.0611 -18.1389

negatif 9.06667* .88015 .000 7.1056 11.0278

5% 29.16667* .88015 .000 27.2056 31.1278

10% 20.63333* .88015 .000 18.6722 22.5944

positif
15% 20.10000* .88015 .000 18.1389 22.0611

negatif 29.16667* .88015 .000 27.2056 31.1278

5% .00000 .88015 1.000 -1.9611 1.9611

10% -8.53333* .88015 .000 -10.4944 -6.5722

negatif
15% -9.06667* .88015 .000 -11.0278 -7.1056

positif -29.16667* .88015 .000 -31.1278 -27.2056

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Hasil perhitungan SPSS menunjukkan bahwa pemberian konsentrasi 5% tidak berbeda nyata
dengan pemberian control. Hal ini berarti pemberian salep 5% tidak memberikan aktivitas
antibakteri Pro….
Pemberian salep konst 10% dengan 15% tidak berbeda nyata, sehingga dapat dinyatakan bahwa
pemberian konse 10% memberikan efek optimal dalam penelitian ini, karena tidak berbeda nyata
dengan kons 15%. Namun demikian aktivitas ini masih kurang dibandingkan dengan control
positif.